The New York Herald Newspaper, March 30, 1871, Page 5

THE BRIE RAILWAY LITIGATION THE ENGLISH STOCKHOLDERS. Injunction Sought For to Restrain «the Issue of More Stock. Yester@ay the farther noarlng of the case of {Heath and others against the Erie Railway Com- ‘any and others was resumed in the United States ‘Circuit Court, before Judge Blatchford. The case, @s already stated, came ap on demurrer by the de- fendants to the bill of complaint. Lengthy argu- meat on the merits of the case proand con. was ‘heard on Tuesday on the part of plaintiffs and de- fendants by the representative counsel on either ide whose turn it was to address the Courh Yes- ‘terday fresh counsel came to the front and con- ‘inued the fusillade of legal oratory. The opening ‘gun was fired by Mr. Evarts on behalf of the com- plainants. ARGUMENT OF MR. EVARTS. Mr, William M. Evarts opened the argument yes- ‘erday in favor of the plaintiffs. He contended that Shere was no such infirmity in the position of Mr, Bart as plaintiff as would prevent him from obtain. ‘tng legal redress as against parties who interfered ‘witn his ownership of the stock. That was setued 4m the reperts. How could a party maintain an action of trover against the company that had not asduutted him on its books by a trausfer to a com- Pleted title or for a refusal to recognize his rignt to ‘‘ranafer the stock unless he was the legal owner? Did aman maintain trover on an equitable title to the thing convertea? Never. Who did own the stock? The company did not own it, The man who sold it to the plaintiffs did mot own it, and if the plaintim did mot own it then nobody owned if As the plaintifs had not formed thelr Dill to follow the receiver, innocent or accomplice aa the case might be, or to burden themselves with Utigation in that respect as against him, they had Undertaken to say that the defendants bad been stewards of this property, in its revenue, manage- ment, expenditure and contracts; and they had fouad instances in which the defendants had played the part of the unjust steward. Now the master ‘calls upon the unjust steward to account to him for his stewardship. Was it necessary that the steward should bring in gil the servants to whom he had shown favor and demand explanation from them as to the payment of money more than was due to bis lord’s servants? No. There was no demand that Fiske, Gourd and Lane should account for the $1,000,000. given to Vanderbilt, or the $429,000 given Bcheli for the benefits gained in the contract with the Narragansett company. It was not asked that Vanderbilt should answer for them nor the Boston, Hartford and Ene Railroad Company. That was mot pretended. If they made them parties the bill ‘would be objected to as multifarious. The tearned gentleman then proceeded to refer to ‘the eleetion of the directors of the Erie Railroad, and tn this connection he said he only asked for an interlocutory order to those people to hold an elec- tion. That might not be relief that could be granted on this showing, ag it had relation to an election mow passed; but if his learned opponents would show any demand to oust any of the directors, not defendants, from office, ora demand for relief in a ‘@ecree based on this subject thus introduced as col- lateral and historical in the progress of the suit, he rephed that there was time to demur to the bill, be- cause no such relief could be had. If the plaintifts had put them in they could have demurred ag the relief sought on much better grounds, because it could not fran! ted, and the plaitifs should have to submit to it. Judge ferd—There is no such relief sought for in the pill, Mr. Evarts—Not in the prayer. Mr, D. D, Field—There is @ distinct averment in the body of the bill that there should be such relief. Mr. Evarts—It is a question of the interpretation of the act which was passed in 1868 The following @lection was in 1869. There was no classttication made prior to thatelection, but the classification ‘was made prior to the ejection of 1870. It 1s a ques- tion of interpretation. ‘The learned gentleman then proceeded to de- nounce the management of the Erie Company and to expiae What he termed the cunning and daring that had been exnibited in the case of the Erle manage- ment. He said that in the risk that was being run between the vile, the injurious, the violent and the fraudulent m every community against the courage, truti and justice of the good, and coping with every institution, Whether it were executive, legislative or judicial, to see whether it could not Snails, put its neck on just goverument, governments that maintained civilization were as steady, 28 courageous, and as persistent In bel! one step ahead of them in therace, Whenever it appeared, upon actual experiment, that justice had been two strong for one means of fraud, then the ‘attempt of {he iraudulent contrivers and actors was to mcet and oVerddine this cundition of judicial in- terference. Under the advice of their own cupidity, and onder a Gites or rae Jaw pepe, ry Sie no matter which, they sousht to present themselyey when they Bhd Hot combat tn justice With Weapons gud armor that were proof against the powers of the court, but they find an elastic system that was ex- ressed in the priuciple that fraud shail not become justice; that the armory of truth and justice has ‘Weapons that had not yet been drawn, and that there are judges who can wield them with same courage and with the same ex- ecution which the long. precedents of the courts and the power of justice demanded should be put in force against that wickedness that sometimes succeeded and heretofore had been ‘submitted to, Counsel went on to refer to the favored managers of this Erie concern; to alleged pirates bearing. down on the shareholders and pong their booty inthe lap of this court; and vo what he termed the vast scheme of fraud de- veloped iu this Erie litigation, After adverting to wome legal aspects of the case, Mr, Evarts observed that this corporation was s0 much infected and in fested With tlc disease of which he had complained that it might be necessary for the. protection of ‘the rights of the shareholders, of which the direc- tors were considered to be the pro’ to ap- Pointa receiver; and he concluded an eloquent argument by observing that if this Erie manage- ment couid by holding elections which it controlied @eteat the ents of justice and the claims of the shareholders, then they might say that justice was ‘outwitted and bound, as Sampson was with his ves. ARGUMENT OF JUDGE CURTIS. Ex-Judgo Curtis, of Massachusetts, followed for “the defendants. inthe course of his brief address he said be eae it immaterial with respect to any westion arising in the qase how the defendants ob- ined their offices, The question ts, what is al- Jeged in the bill to have been dene by the defendants an theirofice. It wiil befound that what is charged 4 the-bill as having been done by these defendants in their respective ofices amounts, when general- ized. to this—that these three delendants availed themselves of the power which was entrusted to them to commit breaches of trust for their own profit; that thece three defendants, holding the ‘offices, one of president, another of director and the ‘third ofsolicitor of the company, usurped a power not granted to them by the corporation and used that ower to commiya breach of trust for thelr own profit. is exhausts the legal substance of every charge in the bill filed against these defendants. ‘Tne case has been treated by counsel for the complainants us ® case involving corporate action within the corporate powers, ora corporate act without corpo- powers. Whereas in truth and in fact there is tin any one of the allegations contained in the ‘bill und on which they ask for relief, in any legal Sense, a corporate act done, within or without cor- | ete powers. They show no resolution of any vard of directors authorizing any of the acts cha |. They show no vote of any corporate meet- ing directing any of these thit to be done, They Bay that these three trustees of the corporation have secretly misued their powers, but they do not say that these acts were known to or sanctioned by the board of directors or the managing body. Itisa case, as they say, where the corporate power hag been misused and Where power has been usurped by the defendants beyoud the corporate power. ‘he other side cannot produce a case where a com- piaint has ever succeeded in a court of equity to charge @ corporation with illegal cept an application to the board of directors or managing body, in some form or mode, was made for redress. Tbe complainants made no representa- tion of these allegations to the board. The question then arises, have they shown any excuse or sutll- cient reason for net making such application? They must show, in addition, that the board was in such ® condition that the majority of them were in favor of these alleged commissions of breach of trust, to enable them to bring this bill. They say, indeed, that a majority of the board, too easy and confiding and somewhat in neglect of thetr own duty in the premises, suffered these three direetors to carry on the business of the company, knowing nothing of their want of fidelity, aud that wher those commu- nications come to be tnade to them they would con- tinue the same line of duty. That 14 not a legal conclusion, That is mot the principle on which business 13 transacted, nor is it the policy Whfch directs the government uf the United States. They charge tiat the poy of these directors had signed a paper by whicit. they bound themselves to support the policy of Gould or resign. Was the understanding to be that by tla? word “policy” they Meant to support the defendants in the commission of the frauds charged in the bill, of anything like them; any frauds of the same natgre or any Irauds Atal, The word “policy” is signiicant enough— poles. fa to the mode of management, As to leasing his Or that. road; policy as to the kind of equip. ment, quality of ratla, or any of the detans with re- Sdoct to the conduct and management of the voad in NEW YORK HERALD, THURSDAY, MARCH 30, .1871.—TRIPLE SHEET. a regular and proper mariner. Are those gentlemen to be convicted by your Honor, a8 a matter of tegal tnference, of Bay jesign to abandon their du toward the road by means of a paper of that kind? hig is an tnierence the Court cannot draw from this per. The presumption is that these men would fave done thelr duty, aud inasmuch as the complain. ants have not shown that these men would havo violated the trust reposed in them your Honor must believe that bad they been requested to take avy action in the matter, right and proper and for the general interest, that they wouid have done chelr whole duty in the premises. ‘The complainants can- notapply to have the remedial process taken out of the hands of the board of directors, for the reason that they made no application for relief to the board. Had this been done, and the poard’s refusal to interfere aniounted to a breach of trust, then the present action would be legal. And, therefore, they are Dot entitled (o come here and ask for. preventive remedy against these three defendants against the ration and its servants, because they have laid 10 foundation for their tttle of reilef from this Court on the refuse] of the board on appilcation made to them to prosecute. Counsel concluded that the whole board of directors should have ocen made party detendants to the charge of breach of trust Qud an opportunity given them to defend them- selves, That it was the right of the de fendant to answer under oath or not at all— that it ts not the right of the complain. it to ui) efendant any answer at an answer under oath; that this 1s what bas Tequired in this case, and when the defendant comes here by demurrer on that account he comes with an appropriate mode of pleading to raise that objection. If a complainant waives an answer he waives the only answer he is bound to make, and the defendant may come into court and say the only answer Fam bound to make 1s waived and [ am not bound 0 make any other answer to this bill, MOTION FOR AN INJUNCTION, Mr, Evarts said he now made a motion for an in- Junction to restrain the defendants, Fisk, Gould and the Erie Railway Company, from making any fur- ther issue of stock. ‘This motion 13 based upon an aMdavit of Mr. John Swan, of London, agent of Heath & Raphael, who has arrived in New York, and-who aeposes upon in- formation and belief that Fiske and Gould and those acting with them propose to issue anoiher large amount of Erie stock, aud that if this be done it will result in great jury to the company, as he esti- mates that such issue of shares must be sold at twenty per cent belew their value. Mr. Stuughton replied that the law was that the demurrer should bo first decided before the injunc- ton could be granted. Judge Blatchiord intimated that he would hear the motion. Mr, Stoughton said that Mr. Lane, of counsel for the Eric Company, was ready to stipulate in open court that there should be no issue of shares until the demurrer was decided. Mr. Evarts—Why not consent to an injunction ‘until the demurrer is décided? Mr. Lane—No, no, Mr. Evarts—Hecause if the stipulation is violated ‘we cannot punish the party violating it for con- tempt. Mr, Stoughton—The afidavits have been sent to me, but as I nave been so much engemed in this case Lhave not had time to examine. if Mr. Evarts in- sists On an injunction I shall be prepared to argue the case in the morning. The matter was then adjourned, it being stated that Mr. Lane, on behalf of the Erie Company, wonld submit this morning to the Court some stipulation 1m respect to the point above discussed. THE RECEIVERSHIP OF THE ENGLISH STOCK. The Engitsh reference in the case of Heath and Raphae: and the Erie Ratlway Company, for the pur- pose of ascertaining what has become of the 60,000 shares of Erie stock, claimed to be the property of Heath and Raphael, the English shareholders, and now alleged to be in the custody or unaer the con- trol of Mr. James H. Coleman, the receiver appointed by virtue of an order of the State Court, was com- menced yesterday before Kenneth G. White, the master named by Judge Blatchford in the United States Circutt Court. TESTIMONY OF MR, JAMES H. COLEMAN, THE RE- CEIVER, Mr. Coleman was examined. He testified as fol- lows:—I am the receiver appointed by Judge Bar- nard of the Erie stock claimed by Heath and Raphael; I have not in my possession a copy of the original order of the Supreme Court appointing me receiver; I received notice of that appointment on ‘the 27th of June, 1870, but was not -present at the Making of the order; 1t was served upon me at m; office by Mr. Morgan, of the firm of Lowe, Clarke Morgan; my first action as receiver was to qualify by executing the bond, which was approved by the Court, and filed im the County Clerk’s office; prior to the filing of that bond I did not receive anythi referred to in the order; on the same day I receive it I called at the ofice of the Erie Rallway Com- any and made @ demand for the certificaves of he stock referred to; I am quite confident that I made the demand , to Fisk; one of my assistants accompanied me; no one else was present, to my knowledge, on the part of the Erie Railway Compfiny; L had with me a cer- tified ef of the order op making the deman Fisk said he couid not comply with it, as the certifi- cates were in the charge of Wiliam D. Harris; I called on Harris, and found he had gone up town; this was ou Saturday; I called again on Monday and made the demand on Harns at the ofiice of the com- pany. Q. What passed between you and Harris at what tume? A. Harris delivered to me, 1n pursuance of my demand, ten bundies of ceriticates of stock of the Erie Kauway Company—common and preferred stock; there were twenty-seven shares of preferred stock, and these shares were represented by a sin- gle certificate, separate from the ten bundies; the gertificates were ted in buuijes and counted over 16 me by Harris and another Hae, whose name 1 do not remember; the paper eyewear is & NU Ran the oeselet I gaye on hat dceaslo#, and the Inilfals J. Hl. 0. where tiey appear on this aper agaltist th énumerition, are in oy hand Wri ings the certificates so received by me were deposited in the Safe Deposit Compan) of New York, and remained there until the 6th of December tollowing: on that day 1 caused the stock represented by these cerlifitates to be tranferred to me at the office of the Company, and these bundles were again counted; 1 was present when they were counted, on the 27th of June, in the directors’ room in the office of the Erie Aaniny Company, and I do not think Fisk was there; the bundles were untied, but no certificates wére removed to my Knowledge; Ttook these bundies personally with me when left and deposited tem in the Sate Deposit Company; it was stated at the time that the bundles were left for registry and transfer; Harns and myself counted over the whole of these bundles and were so engaged for three or four hours; I do not think Fisk entered whe room during the time, and I left nothing when I wentaway but the receipt; during the time these bundies were 1n the Safe De- sit Company I had the key and toes, and in at interval 1am not aware that { periormed an} act a8 Pecelver under the order of the Court; I tool no steps to have the stock registered or transferred prior the 6th of September; my reason for not aoing 80 Was because I was ansent at Long Branch and Saratoga; on the 6th of September I transierred this stock, uuder my name, to the books of the company at thelr office, and two certificates were issued to me which I here produce, e certifcatcs, which were issued by J. Gould and the Secretary of tne company, were then read and received in evidence.) Q. What took place on the occasion when you made the transfer? A, I went there, taking with me the bundles as they Jay in the Safe Deposit Com- anys the bundles were again counted; I went with us, the secretary, Harris and another man,whosigns himself W. J. H.: Iam quite positive Gould was not in the reom; I had preeiously notified them of my 1n- tenuon to make tue transfer; 1 think the notice was sent to Gould that I intended to have the stock transferred to me; the stock as then counted cor- responded with the stock when placed ia the Safe Deposit Company; at the same mterview when I carried the ten bundies to the office of the company I received the two certiticates which I produced; Otis countea over the whole again and took charge ofthem; I signed my name to the transfer book, and transierred my own as recetver of the stock in ques- tion; I don’t remember the manner of the transfer; T signed transfer tor each of these certillcates produced to-day; I presume Ous had charge of the transfer books; while the inter- view lasted nothing was done with the original cer- tifleates; they remained on the table and when I le(t they were being tied up again in one large bundle; the bundle was never untied except for the purpose of being counted; there was nothing written on an of these certificates, for we were Very careful in aeak with them, Who was in the room when you left, leavin ne vows bundles on the table? A. I think Otis an aris. eee you seen them since or any one of them? 10. Q. And, therefore, had not possession of these ten bundles or any one of them since? A. No, I never saw or heard o! them; I would not kuow Harris if I saw him in the street, and 1 have no acquaintance watts st the fu hearin; stage the further hearing of the matter w: adjourned to Friday next, bag THE SEVENTH AVENUE BURGLARY, In connection with the attempted burglary on the grocery store of Hunter & Co., Captain Killabe, of the Twenty-sccond precinct, has now arrested three persons, named respectively David Martin, Ailen and Thomas Judge, Yue latter's guilt ng matter is, however, rather @ matter of doubt, and he is for the present held only to enable the police to examine into his character. The others have been committed for trial at the Yorkville Court in defauit of $1,000 bail each. ICE ON THE LAKES, BUFFALO, March 29, 1871. The propeller Praxes, from Toledo, laden with corn, hag been outside the harbor since eleven A. M., unable to get in because of the fee, whieh ex- tendg in an unbroken mass for a ulstance of six or seven miles. —<—$—— COURT OF APPEALS CALENDAR, ALBANY, March 29, 1871, Tho following is the Court of Appeals calendar ee st i 80, 1871: NOR, 168, M4, 172, 27, 42, 75, THE COURTS. ACase in Bankruptcy—The Bishop Matrimonial Difficulty—A Real Estato Purchase in Litigation—Purchasing an As sessment—Decisions, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. Extra Allowances to Portmnaters at Military Poste—Fraudulent Removal of Bonded Li- quors. Wasninaron, March 29, 1871. No. 121. Gideon B, Wright et al. vs, The United States,—Error to the Circuit for the Middle district of Tennessee.—This was an action against the prin- cipal and sureties on @ postmaster's bond. At the trial the defendants claimed by way of set off under the fifth section of the act of March 8, 1863, certain allowances which would sccrue to the postmaster in consequence of a military post bemg near the post office, whose mail passed through it, But it appeared that the Department had refused to allow the claim, The court, how- ever, instructed the jury that if they found that by reason of the extra duties of the ofiice, occasioned by the military post, the postmaster was entitled to the additional pay provided by the act, their verdict should be for the defendants, ‘The jury so found, and the verdict was accordingly. ‘rhe government pings the case here, insisting that the court erred in referring to the jury a matter which, under the law, rested wholly in the discretion of the Post- master General, whose decision was final, and which was against the claim for extra pay. No. 124, Harrington vs. The United States, and No. 125, Boyden vs, The United States.—Error to the Circuit Court for the Distrivt of Massachusetts.— This was an information filed by the gevernment against 270 barrels of distilled spirits, claimed by Harrington in vehalf of bimself and Boyden & Co, The charge was that these spirits were found else- where than in @ bonded warehouse, and that they had never paid the tax imposed oy the law thereon; Also that they were in the custody of Harrington, doing business under the name of Boyd & Co., for the ee of Betray sold and removed in fraud of the Internal revenue laws and with the design of avoiding the tax. At the trial it appeared that im April, 1867, a quantity of spirits was withdrawn from bonded warehonses in Boaten on prover (application, for }rahaportation to Eastport, Me., and for exportation from that point and upon bond which afterwards Proved io be false and fraudulent, These spirits ‘Were not transported, but were removed, as alleged, to the place where the seized spirits were found. ‘The verdict was for the goremmens, except in re- apect to seventy-four barrels. In ‘support of the writ oferror it is insisted that the spirits having passed through the rectifiers, when they became maixed with other spirits, no portion of the rectitied Spirits was liable to forieiture, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT—IN BANKAUPTCY. The Metropolitan Hotel. In the suit of George 8, Trimm and Edward Sum- Der, in involuntary bankruptcy against Simeon Le- Jand & Co., of the Metropolitan Hotel, the Marshal as taken possession of the hotel unwl the further order of the Court. UNITED STATES COMMISSIONERS’ COURT. The Lottery Ruids. The cases in which David Lindo, proprietor of several lottery offices, and a number of other lot- tery dealers are charged before United States Com- mussioners with non-payment of special tax, will in all probability be settled by the accused parties being allowed to pay the tax and the costs of prosecution. TH Probably will put an extinguisher on the lottery rai “7% SUPREME COURT--TRIAL TERM—PART 2. Trials and Tribulations of a Sub-Tenant. Before Judge Van Brunt McMillen vs, Knoz.—This is an action to recover $20,000 damages for an alleged forcible ejection of the plaintim by the defendant from No. 340 Broad- way. The defendant was the lessee of the building and let the same to James Eustace, with a clause im the lease that the latter should not relet without his written consent, Eustace did sublet the basement to the plainuff without obtaining the written consent, but, as he claims, with the verbal permission of the de- fendant to do so. On July 1, 1867, the plaintim at that time having paid to Eustace the rent in ad- vance up to the Istof August, was snneogpeniy, cailed upon by Knox, meantime Eustace having surrendered his lease of the entire premises, ex- ce} ting this basement. Knox, it is claimed, said he would — settle ‘with McMillen or see to him, Soon after, as alleged, he called on the Plaintit and told him to leave, and the latter in- sisted on remaining, goats ing that he had paid “hid rent, and had a righ tu do so, Open thy refug it is sald that Knox said if he did nob leave bi would smoke him out as they do the Kilkenny Tats, He then commenced to tear down the building. McMillen attempted to drive the men away. There was alively skirmish kept up for about two weeks, when McMillen was arrested, taken before Judge Dowling and discharged. Upon this the defendant instituted proceedings for disposses- sion, and succeeded. This suit 1s brought by reason of the alleged attempted forcible entry by Knox be- | fore obtaming the right by law to take possession, The case ig sill on, =" y 2oN nat mi SUPREME Coun T=GiRSUIT—PART Bk mo oS. Decisions. +f By Judge Ingraham, | The National Mechantes’ Banking Assoctation vs, The Mariposa Company.—Setued %8th March. SUPERIOR COURT—SPECIAL TERM. Another Chapter in the Bishop Divorce Case. Before Juage Jones. Eleanor F. Bishop vs. David P. Bishop.—This case, which for several years past bas been brought seml-perlodically before the courts, was up again yesterday morning on a motion on behalf of the platnuff for $1,000 counsel fees and $370 allowances to defend counter charges of adultery. The case was argued at length by Mr. Peck, counsel for the laintiff, and Mr. Dyott, counsel for the defendant. ‘he Court reserved its decision, Decisions. John Tedroneui vs. Arthur S, Woodward.—Refer- ence ordered. Henry J. Stmon vs, The Stonewall Ol Company.— Order granted, The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Ratl- road Company vs. Henry E. Bowns.—Motion granted,’ and reference to Delano ©, Calvin to hear and determine ordered. Herman Stein vs. The Great Western Insurance Company.—Order granted, Fred Brodte vs. Clark a McDonough.—Reference ordered, Farley vs. Risley.—Order granted. Hattie Leland vs. Edward Gilmore.—Rezerence ordered, Fredertck R. Scheltter vs, Smith.—Order granted. Jacob B, Tallinan vs. George Wilkes.—Same. * COMMON PLEAS—TRIAL TERM—PART I. Repudiating n Renal Estate Purchase. Before Judge Loew, Jonn Meeks et al. vs, Edward J. King.—This was an action brought by the executors of the estate of the Jate Joseph Meeks against the defendont, an extensive real estate owner in this city, to recover $6,984 under the following circumstances:—The executors of Mr. Meeks, being vested in all his real estate, put it up at public auction at the Merchants’ Exchange Salesrooms, in Broadway, on the 9th of February, 1869, Among the property sold were two buildings, 52 Broad street and New street, which were knocked down to the highest bidder, Mr. King, the defendant, for sixty-four thousand and odd dol- lars, The1ith of March was appointed as the day on which Mr. King was to receive the title deeds of the property, but on that day he failed to ut inan appearance, and after formal notice to fim. ‘the property was resold at a loss of about $6,250, for which loss, together with the purchase money of the first sale, plaintiffs now seek to hold him responsible. The defence set up was that the buildings did not correspond with the map and terms of sale, and that Mr. King, on ascet ng this it, immediately after the sale, went in haste to the office of Mr. Ludlow, the auctioneer, and withdrew his bid before it had been recorded in the auctioneer's book, The jury remaining out for several hours. The Court ordered a sealed verdict for this morning. Buying Up a United States Government Assexement. August Oppenheimer vs. Charles Hayman.—This was an action brought to recover $10,000 under the following state of facts:—In February, 1867, there having been some time previously a government tax of some $25,000 assessed against one Zachariah Oppenheimer, the*defendant appliea to him and stated he could procure asettlement of the claim with the United States government for $10,000, Sub- sequently defendant applied to the plaintiff and re- peatet the same statement. The plaintit said he would give him the $10,000, and he gave him a check the next day,-the defendant stating that if the clalm was not compromised tm three weeks the money would be returned. At the expiration of the three weeks, the mat- ter not having been compromised, plaintiff! made application jor the money but could not get it, and the present suit was brought for its recovery. Ex- Judge Barrett, on behalf of the defendant, moved yor a nonsuit, on the ground that @ demurrer should have been put inthe compiaint. As the complaint was at present framed the plaintti!’ could not go to trial in this action. Plaingia’s counsel asked the Lawrence Shursta was granted, and the case was allowed to stand over unul the May term, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS—SENERAL TEAM. Decisions. By Judge Loew. The National Mechantes' Banking Assoctation of rive York vs. Usher.—Complaint dismissed, with costs, By Judge Robinson. “ Slern vs. De Brackelen,—Motion dented, dismissed, Provost vs. Wiliains,—Proceedings with $10 costs, , Ran et al, vs. Schielle.—Motion granted on terms. COURT CALENDARS—THIS DAY. SvrreMe Court—Crrcurr—Part 1—Held by Judge Sutherland,—Nos, 1, 2, 99, 33, 145, 167, 67, 203, 181, 188, 185, 191, 81, 141, 193, 19944, 209, 213, 154, 167. Part 2—Held’ by Judgo Van Brunt.—Nos. 244, 246, 1888, 202, 62234, 126, 192, 200, 186, 36, 14434, 208, 228, 268, 646, 1992, 244, 68, 76, 266. CoMMON PLEAS—TRIAL TERM—Part 1—Held by Judge Loew.—Nos, 129, 71334, 123, 220, 458, 843, B44, 649, 184, 620, 834, 782, 638. FINANCIAL AND COMMERCIAL, WALL STREET, } Wepnespay, March 20—6 P, M. On ’Change to-day wheat continued firm, but dull. The cotten market was steady and without special feature, STOCK BXCHANGE Gossir. In a few weeks workmen will begin an important alteration Of the Stock Exchange building. Com- plait is made that the portion of the Long Reom occupied by the brokers between the formal sessions of the board is unhealthy, owing to bad ventilation and the lowness of the ceiling. The alveration con- templated is the opening up of the Long Room within the railings so as to take in the “up staira’? apartment, thus giving a large, dome-like altitude to the space occupied by the brokers. There will be, consequently, no “up stairs’? room except for the government board, which will be unmolested. ‘The regular calls and the open market will thence- forward be held on the ground floor. Pending the improvements referred to the Stock Exchange will occupy the adjoining hall of the late open board of brokers, MONEY THREE TO FIVE PER CENT. Money was easy at four to five per cent, with ex- ceptions at three per cent to the leading govern- ment dealers. FOREIGN FXOHANGE WEAK. Foreign exchange was weak and prime bankers’ sixty-days sterling bills sold freely at 109%. Good Dillgof the same duration drawn by the Pennsyl- vania Kallroad Vompany on London were marketed at 10955. 5 COMMERCIAL PAPER, There were no important changes in the rates or volume of business in commerelal paper, whieh was quoted 6 a 7 per cent fer prime names, THE NEW LOAM. Considerable satisfaction was felt at the with- drawal of the agencies of the Messrs, Rothschilds and Baring Brothers for the receipt of subscriptions to the new loan in Europe, and the domestic bankers exhibit a more hearty interest in aiding Mr. Boutwell since he has thus determined to let all foreign houses have an equal chanee in receiving subscriptions, The time for subscribing to the first instalment of $20,000,000 five per cents has veen indefinitely extended, and the national banks show more disposition to exchange their five-twenties for the new bonds, especially since they may do so ‘with the guarantee that they will not be subject to further changes in the collaterals which they hypothecate in Washington against their circula- tion. The subscriptions to-day reached $3,268,500, Making the total thus far $44,518,000, THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASE OF FIVE-TWENTIES, At tne usual weckly purchase to-day of five-twen- tles the amount offered at the Sub-Treasury, in re- sponse to the call for two millions, was only $2,529,000, at 103.80 to 109,39, ex intere: The pur- chased bonds Cost 108.80 a 109.30, or an average of about 109.05, when gold was selling at 110.25. GOVERNMENTS HIGHER, The small offerings at the Sub-Treasury, coupled With the reaction in gold and a further advance in London, where the 62's were strong at an adyance to 9254, rendered whe government list firm, and occasioned @ slight improvement 4n prices. The ht fmouut offered 4t tho Suo-Treasury 1s regarded 4n indication that popular sentiment is getting accustomed to the idea of the success of the new loan, and that holders of five-twenties ex- pect to receive par in gold for their bonds at no very distant day, especially ca the Afsekebancy between the currency Valley or five-twenties and bid rt) Tapfdly diminishing. The currency sixes vere actively strong, and advanced to 11434, GOLD STRONG—110%% a 1103, The gold market was strong and steady at 1101, @ 11074, subsequent to @ few sales early in the day at 11034. It remains to be seen, however, whether this streagth was not the result of a continuous demand to cover the very extensive short interest which underlies the market and prevents a more rapid fall. The “bulls” are encouraged to hold on by the fact that the margin with which they buy, if as large as that usually employed in stock specula- tion, will limit the extent of their possible losses, while, with the prevalence of a large short interest, they may have their gold carried free of charge, if, inaeed, they do not most of the time receive a con- sideration for its use. The “bears,” on whe other hand, are persistent in staying ‘“‘short,””* for the reason that they have the prospect of neavy gold sales throughout the month of April by the govern- ment, to be supplemented by the payment (possibi y the prepayment) of the $18,000,000 of May interest on the public dept, STOCKS HEAVY AND LOWER. The stock market was raided by the “ bull’? cliques, who took advantage of each lull in business to break prices by the rapid sale of a few hundred shares, leaving the “ bears,” whose hopes they had thus excited, to keep the market depressed by speculative sales at the reduced scale of prices. Whenever the “bulls” turned around to buy again the market ran up suddenly. The result of this strategy was a feverish and unsettled tone to the day’s business and a gradual lowering of prices, which declined one to one and a half per cent, The exceptions, however, were the North- west stocks, Union Pacific, Pacific Mall, Western Union and Wabash, which were firm, HIGHEST AND LOWEST PRICES OF STOCKS, The foliowing table shows the highest and lowest prices of the leading speculative stocks during the day:— if Highest. Lowest. New York Central consolidated. 967 9536 New York Central scrip 9346 9236 Harlem. 1293 29 Erie. 21% 20; Reading. 108% =—-103 Lake Shore 103 10134 Wabash... 58 56 57% Pittsburg. 118% 113 Northwestern 88% 87% Northwestern preferrs 967% 96% Rock Island......... 1164 14g Milwaukee and St. Pau 625 60% Milwaukee and St. Paul preferred... 80, 1936 Ohio and Mississippl...........+6 at 463% Col, Chicago, and Indian# Central. 23% 22% Union Pacitic...........+ 26 26% Western Union Telegraph. 6794 Pacific Mail. ee 4356 Adams Express. Ths THE COURSE OF THE GOLD MARKET. The following table shows the fluctuations of the geld market:i——. *v . To A.M. -110, 11036 10:26 A. i 110% 10:59 A. 110: ll A. +110: . @ 110% In the gold loan market the rates a from 1 per cent for carrying to 8 per cent for borrowing, The operations of the Gold Exchange Bank were ag follows:— Gold cleared... Gold balances. 800, | Currency balances, 2,008,524 ‘The engagement of specie for to-morrow’s stéam- ers is already about $300,000, but some may be with- drawn should exchange continue weak. . , LATEST PRICES OF GOVERNMENTS, The following were the closing street prices for the government list:—United States currency fixes, 114% @ 114%; do. s1xes, 1881, regia. tered, 115% a 115%; do. do, coupon, 116% a 1157; do. five-twentlos, registered, May and November, 111% a111%; do. do., 1862, coupon, do, 12 a 112%; do, do., 1864, do, do, 111% 111%; do. do, 1805, do, do., 11154 @ 111%; do. do., registered, January and July, 1103¢ @ 110%; do. do., 1895, COUDOD, do. 11036 @ 11036; do. Ao, 1867, do, $50,758,000 do, ten-forties, registered, 1.7% & 118; do. AO, coupon, 108 a 10834 THE CITY BANK STIARRS, The following were the bids for the city bank shares:—New York, 136; Manhattan, 153; Merchants’, 115; Mechanics’, 137; Unlon, 140; America, 145; City, 230; Phenix, 108; North River, 86; Trad men’s, 16314; Fulton, 160; Greenwich, 210; Butchers aud Breve 1 5 \Wechitnles and Traders’, 137; 48; National, 126; Merchants’ Exchange, 102; Seventh Ward, 108; State ef New York, 113; Commerce, 119; Mechanica’ Banking Association, 115; Broad- Way, 200; Ocoan, 02; Mercantile, 126; American Exchange, 117; Chatham, 166; Bank of the Republio, 118; Bank of North America, 105; Hanover, 103; Irving, 125; Motropolitan, 18634; People’s, 142; Grocers’, 116; Hast Kiver 112; Nassan, 10044; Conti- nental, 95; St. Nicholas, 115; Commonwealth, 88; New York County, 220; Park, 159; Manufacturers and Merchants’, 100; Central National, 108; Second National, 166; Fourth National, 110; Ninth National, 110; Oriental, 169; Gold Exchange, 70. THE RAILWAY MORTGAGES. ‘The following were the bids for the railway mort- gage bonds:— New York Cen 6's, 1888.. 94 Manib'l & Naplee let m. 88! a to eat New York Cen 6's, 1887. Gt West lat Y.CenGs, sub, 1876 Gt West Lat in; 180 ¥ Cen 7's, com, 187 Gt Weat id Tey wo Bost, Hart & E, atd Tol & W cons cony, iq Cedar Fee Min lat SOUTHERN SROURITIES IRREGULAR, The Southern list was generally dull, the only activity ocourring in the new South Carolina July bonds, which were weak and declined to6l. The Virginias were strong and higher on the passage of the bill at Richmond to fund two-thirds of the maaldenintadiaceliiietiitieaiteesivensaieonndectehcectaliaan Court for permission to amend hts complaint, which | d0,, 11034 a 110%); do. do., 1808, do, do., 1109% a 110%; debt into new interest-paying bonds to be issued January 1,1872. The fennessees and Missouris were firm at a fractional advance. The North Carolina spe- cial tax bonds declined to 1834. The following were the final street prices:—Tennessee, ex coupon, 6444 & 64%; do., new, 6446 a 64%; Virginia, ex coupon, 68 a 69; do. new, 71 a 7134; do. registered stock, Old, 5534 @ 654; Georgia sixes, 81 a 82; do, sevens, 89 & 91; do. do., old, 91 @ 92; North Carolina, ex coupon, 47 @ 473g; do. funding, 1806, 36a 39; do, do., 1868, 28 a 30; do. new, 24 @ 25; do. special tax, 185¢ a 19; Missourl sixes, 92% a 92%; do. Han- nibal and St. Joseph, 91 @ 92; Louisiana sixes, 68 a 10; do., new, 63 & 65; do. levee sixes, 72 a 75; do. do., eights, 88 a 90; do. Penitentiary sevens, 72a 74; do. railroad eights, 70 a 82; Alabama fives, 68 a 70;.do. elghts, 10234 @ 103; do. ratlroad eights, 94 a 99; South Carolina sixes, 72 a 78; do. new, January and July, 61a 613;; do, do., April and October, 62 a 63; do, registered stock, old, 65 @ 70; Arkansas’ sixes, 57 a 60; do, sevens, 55 a 62, SALES AT THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, Wednesday, March 29—10:15 A. M. "Bl, r. bo 115% 90sheLS&M 8 Ri 6, 568.... 119 BY PSsssae-* 3 eae gs ast ia ec 7EBSES f Pao KR Ist im. bow) U Pac 7's, land 20 Alt Ter H.24 pt. 2000 0 & KI &P RR Ts 10000 Gt West lat, "8... 884g 6000 T & W Int, 8 La. cor 2000 Mil & SUP Intm 8's 104% 200 4000 StL & Iron M ist.. B95 3000 Tol & Wab oq bds. Big 200 10000 Great West 24 m. 2500 S'uth Pa of Mo 1 100 she Md ¢ ELAEE. & é 100 400 800 500 200 10 4 60 di b 10) Bos,H & LrieRR. 150 A 200 Chic & Alton RR, U0 10 de Pr is 100 Odi 200 100 ChickAi RR 300 100 Ohio & Miss 600 4 a7 1209 100 Ohio & Miss 7%} 2000 200 St L & IM Bi “4 toon ¥ ae Me i 10000 ve 17 NS Centr 118 10000 do 98 ¥9 10000 do. 922 8975 BOO do. 82! oy 50030 do. 93° 100 Han & 89 200000 316 4 80, 8 c Big 400 Erie Ri, Ms 10 Alb &Sus RK 8155 400 Harlem ‘iit, 12935 do. 87 Wag 87 NY AN WRE:.¢b'e 147 25 Reading Ri 1 12:15 and 2115 o'Clock P.M. 100000 US: . “67 03 110: pn ep SE is 10000, UB 6's, "Bl, r. [0000 U 85-20, 0, "64. 2000 UB 6-20, 0, "66. 20000 do ya7000 Tenn os, 0, 'a 6's, reg, ol 15000 do! ie 5y00 do. 1000 Mor& Ea const bs. 5000 Mil & St P's, Ist.. 400 shs Opn. Coal of Md lo. Bgaaagys Ses Ee8e Ex NYC&HR ER ‘Eeeaaegeaye STREET QUOTATIONS. Half-past Five o’Clock P. M. Mage ty eae Mga ay 61% a 416 1 te os Bs 3S COMMERCIAL REPORT, Wepnrspay, March 29—6 P; M. Asnes.—Receipts, 31 packages. The market for pot was steady, with @ fair demand, at $6 75 a @7 25, Pearl was neglected at $8 50 a 89 25, CorrE®.—There was no demand for Rio from first hands, and, aside from a small trade with jobbers, there eeear er anes as od dow 18o. a gets peace do. 190 WTS lots, lve. ger ‘Ail gold, in bonds tava ke ae tek M4 Ke. 5 srotintio: er's Lawor, t inarrow limits, ' 1 ti ‘Change was one line bales, sold by South street house, and frraing the largest tansaction in cotton for Immo ery, for over ten year, The aa fully ny under were dilicult to move. Tho sales werej— pe Li mes total, . at Boening. 4 For export ....csseseeee 87 FAT 4a For nome consumption, 50 4 For epecwlatic 13 5 8 In transi 6 id Total bales. 04 3, 6.368 =Included in ¢ 900 bales to arrive. The market for forward deiiveries was fairly active and prices were without noticeabl The trai y corn ac.» SUD ae 'y Ce Apri ; r at 1A tb Abe, Hdv., 200 “at “13: at" 13 1s-i6e; 103 April, at L-l6e. 100 at 1840, together, 100 April, at 1e.; 100 May and 100 June, at £3 15-[e.. tor other; 100 April, May and June, at 13. 15-18e., together ; May, at 18760. 5 Jue: 090 at H., GM) at 13 60 Soo at 13 18-160. 5 July, 108° at 14e., TW at 14 L-lée. ; August, 100 at 14s¢c., 400 ab HAG, | Exchanges -916c. paid to exchange 200, “April = ly; c. to exchange pri or March?) ‘oveh” terme, “400 Marth ‘tor “Ind Auguste close of ‘Change, 1,200 bales, as fol- ‘May, 300 at 13 18-16c., 300 at'134e. 5 tations of yesterday's fu } April, 13.080; May, Alabama, WN. Oreann Teast, 3 ry Re 134 Me i Good middiini 1654 } a 184, v7 FREIGHTS.--The marked was firm, Dut quiet, ‘The engaze- meuits were :—To London, 5,50) bushels wheat by steam at 800 bbis, four at ae. 4," For Liverpool, by steam, abo bales cotton, mortly at bléd. a 464.7 18 hinds, tobacco by, ateain at 2s. Gd.; 90 bales cotton by sail at 2324, a M824, To Giaszow, by steam, 23,00) busbeln wheat at 734d, ‘and 2,000 bbls. four at is. Two I heat were taken by Sail for Liverpool late yesterday at 42. and about 200 pack ages provisi at 4 TOUR AND CALS. -Recsipty, 2,900 bbls. flour, 2000 wekages cora meal, 13,797 bushels wheat, 101,C}1 do. corn, Brits tio. oate and 891d do, barley. The Gour market ruled quiet but steady. The business was moderate, both for con- fumption and aliipment, comprising about 10,000 bbls. at our Hour was quiet. Bouthern four was steady #526 oo a Ea Sida 6H 6%e 110 bbe 6¢0 660 6*o tee 10 Round hoop Ohi Round boop Obio, trade brands... 7Wa 760 Fanily.. 70 su St. Louis low extrs | to 12 Bt. Louie straight extra. 7 » 1% St Louis cholce double e: 1750 Bi Bt. Louis choice family 8 bea 1050 flor biba 660 bbe 60) miperting aie Saya Go0 extra and famil a . CHa 1D Suwa ll 50 6W) —_ iy" 450 460 —Wheat was quiet but tirm ior choice sampies t spring. The sales were about 55,(00 bushels at $1.55 for ordiaary No. An store, BI £8 tor yood da, delivered, #1 69 for No. 1'do. in sore, $1'69 for amber winter in store und afloat, $i 65 for "common Iifuols winter attoat. Corn was in demand and firmer The salen were about. o,000 bushels at Bic. a B4c. for mixed, Bde m Hic for yellow. were steady, with sales of udout 45,00 bushels within of 673g. a Bic. for inferior to Wesera afloat. 69}e. alc. for Uhio, in store and afloat. Rye was quiet aud nominal at $t 05 a #118 for Western and State. Barley was steady at #1 10a 1 22-the nominal range of common to choice Canasta. GUNNIES.—The market was steady, but quiet at 16. 0 @ 1636c. for bags and 19. a We. for cloth, without sales. Hore wore moderately active. 4 were firm, partiou- larly for prime grades. We quote :-State, dc. a 120, per Its 5 fern, We. nlc ; Western, Be. nd old, Bc, = Te HAY was in good aemand ft Prices, with sales at 91160 81 20 for North ‘river shipplug, $146.0 $1 43 for re- tail qualities, 120 a Bt 80 for long rye, 90c. a1 for short Fre and Ths. 'a We, for oat mM —The demand was light and no sales were effeeted. Fe Care ge 3e 4c. * l0e., gold; oad _ fort c. 8 "in bond; anid Sunn, 6e., Golds Gresded ‘American, $275 and $380 per ton; undressed do, $175 a R185 per, ton. currency; Jute, 54a. a 6e,, gold; juse MOLASSig was firmiy held and, with a, small inquiry, no sp were iwade,, AbUY 480 "bbias New Upeans butts, 34s. a #4, currency, sales of foreign wi made old at from fcc a 80c. We quote :— fe. age: TES for all descriptiu strong, with an upward tendency. Spirits turpent! in fair'demand, and with small offerings a fu ni established. The sales comprise 00) bbia, (partly last ales were reported . for low tn mer- jemand for rosin wus ices were firm; 200 bia. jch price the murket closed strong; 100 bbl. extra pale sold at $7. Wilmington tar was held trinly at m2 70 a $475, in view of the recent advance ew tabliahed fn Wilmington. We heard of no sales, market was quiet and weak for crude in bulk at 1336 without wales, Kefined was on'y moderately active and prices were easier; #,3W0 bbls. wer fold late yesterday evening on private terms, The price for March delivery was about 23%c. We heard of no sales for bls. sold for June at 2c. and 1,500 bbls. fur Jn Philadelphia, the market was quiet and weal 1,009 pbis, March at 28',¢. ; 4,000 bbls. April, with return, af 2344, and 2,00) bbis, each month for May, June and July at se. PRovisions.—Receipts, 8 bbls. beef, 170 do. pork, 874 BAgKAgea cut mente and 417 do, lard; ‘The pork market wat lull, Reavy and lower, closing at 321 25 a 321 37} for mess on the spot and for April and May." The sales were contined to 1,00 bbls mess tor May, at $21 50 and 21 29 for April. i was quiet but nominally unc and cut meats were dull, and only small ie al Une haages prices, Lard was dull an without PETROLEOM. 8. —Recelj ady, with a fair demand at full 300 bi Rangoon, in !ocs, at from t from Bie. to BiGe., tha 7c, w Thies, and 3b tlerces latter price an extreme. stock of Rangoon embraces bags, and of Carolina about 400 tlerces, without decilea change, was at 124c. , nominal, SUGAR.—Tho market was firm with a fair demand, & The transactions were on tie basia of fully 9c. a Sige. for fair'ta good refining Cuba, and com) ioin at 934c., 610 0 at 9 f nd 4 ds. The market steady at 124,¢, for soft white red aud granolated. V ue Mg. ® Bige.; lair refine to good grocery, 9c 9%o. ; centriti at 9h sales closed strong. and Lec. for crushe!, pow. asker, Logsle oxes Dutch xem, 734. a Kise. ; hel dard, Nos. 10 9, 8 74@. 5 do. 10 to 12, 9 3 to'lb, 97ae ato, ‘ a 1» 9756 J0.. 18 to 18, Ic. « % to 30, 1aige.’ a 1240, 4c. m 12%) Porto Rico— amet tee eet des, 9>4¢. @ 104c. futol standard, Nos. 8t012, Be. w 940, ) 248 bags. The market (or Caleutta waa steady, without further sales. Other kinds were quiet but it evious prices. way cow wan quick ont steady, with sales of about 30,000 Ths. at 87,0: a 9e.. the later price for prime. Wuis) Receipts, 1! ‘The market was steady, ales of 20) bbls. at 9340. a 912¢c., mostly at the inside REAL ESTATE MATTER3, Yesterday’s dealings in the real estate market Were on a restricted scale. At the Exchange Sales- room the offerings were light and the attendance small, Asale of Brooklyn property, which was held on ‘Tuesday, illustrates in its results what has been said here in regard to property in that suburb. The fall- ing of in rents there, as well as in this city, makes improved property undesirable for investment. ‘rhe recent decision of the Court of Appeals in the mat- ter of the Prospect Park property east of latbush avenue 19 not likely to help it or umimprovea pro- perty in this respect. We copy the following report of the sale from a local source:— Several hundred persons were present and a good deal of interest was manifested, though the actual bidding was confined to a few sons, and the prices offered only moderate aud jew than the usually esilmated value, The first piece of property offered was a house and two lots, ou the coruer of Grand avenue and Paciiic street, sold under an execution of mortgage. lt soid for $5,700 to Mr. William Sweeny, subject to a mort- age of $700; terms cash. The next sale was or ot houses and lots on Fulton avenue, adjoiuwg Gallatin place, Nos, 91, 92, 93 and 94, sold res ively for $15,700 and $16,900 to Mr. H. N. CH $15,900 and $20,000 to BG. Smith. ‘Tne terms of sale were seventy per cent on bond and mortgage. This property was considered to have brought a good price. Qn private account, two lots, one a cornei, on Bushwick avenue, Were sold for $605 and $575 respectively. The foregoing were sold prelimi. nary to the offer of 100 vacant lots and five houses, which offered the chief attraction of the sale. They were located on Myrtle, Lewis, Flushing and Knick. erbocker avenues, ‘Garden, Winfield, Duryea, Shaffer and Witherspoon streets, Bushwick Boulevard aud roadway, The fine lots offered were situated on Broadway and Duryea street, 25x100 feet. The corner !ot was sold to Mr. Englehart for $1,500. Four adjoining lots, on Broadway, sold to the same party for $1,200, $1,175 and $1,160 respectively. Six lots on Duryea street, were percent by Mr, Falken at an average ip i ly Lana | lots, same size, corner of cl miley: and puryea street, sold for $700 each to Mr. Enright, A house and Wo lots, corner of Shaffer etrect and Knicker- ocker avenue, sold to Mr. John McFarland tor $2,000, ‘Three brick houses on Myrtle avenue, near Broadway, sold for $4,225 each to Mr. Bokern, Four lots on Bushwick avenue and Garden street sold respectively for $975, $560, $600 and $3,500 to Mr. Bennett, Ten lots, bounded by Myrtle avenue, Lewis avenue and Witherspoon street, with a large mansion and outbuildings, late the “eat es a Tt was next oifered, and started at $10, was ran py to $19,000 and then withdrawn. ' A large frame house and five lots of and on Myrtle ave nue wore sold for $8,500 to Mr. Boker, after which the sale was closed. to be resumed at some future day, of which due notico will be given. Out of the large number of persons present there were not to exceed eight ot ten purchasers, The prices brought for the property were regarded as only modcra.e, "The total amount of the sale was $100,725, ‘The following are the particulars of the transa@ tions at the New York Exenange yesterday;— NEW YORK PROPERTY—BY ROBERTS AND M'GUIRE. No. 139 Delan ry ani brick front house, with ad story. and cellar frame extension bg,ania med; 1ot 20473, to Rathmertheus..-... story frame house, with bri ment, D. 8. 0 st, 410 ft. west of av. A, lot $5x100, to Owen Mirrpiy. .5,0C0 House and Lot, p. s. of 48th at, 300 fh. w. of 2d ay, fot 123100, to Raymond De Lamier.. PASBAIO PROCRETY—BY A, J. BLESEKER, b House and lot corner of Peanington ait Pawieson avi lot 100x100; house @ story {rame French rou! ; woderd iuaprovements,, al 31,200