The New York Herald Newspaper, April 4, 1868, Page 10

10 “TMPBACHMENT. CONTINUED FROM THIRD PAGE. + t sy one? A. It was. ba Ware be wont am the President bandying Mr. ‘Evanre—The question is not what was said, } Mr. Boruen—I -do not adopt the of the ‘eounsel. 1 will repeat my question, whether epi- theta were thrown back and forth between the Presi- Gent and the crowd? ‘ars—We object’to the question. The ques- erie was sand.” Every one does not know what bandying epithets ts. Mr. BoTeR ie ™ Yyftners)—Do you know what lying e i = sane suppose our objection will be first , BUTLER—T your pardon; however, I will withdraw the‘question. My pro ition is this—— ‘sql meaear tay cupatigne 1 oe " ear Wi Bor.er—I 01 Ww question as to gpeaning of a word which one of the counsel did jot anderstand. (Laughter,) In Lord reotee Gor- ‘Won’s case the cries of the crowd were allowed to be ice; bubthat question preci is not ‘vecause” Pam on the [os of 8} what said there by way of interruptions, was ‘gsked-ywhether there were interruptions, and whether @here -was a crowd, and if the President stopped to hack epithets at the crowd. . EVARTS—The questions which we object to were those about the bandying of epithets back and forth between the President and the crowd. put.it in another form. Q. ‘What was said by the crowd to the President, and by President to the crowd? A. The President was juently interrupted by cheers and hisses and cries those op} to him. » BUTLER—You have a right to refresh your memory by any memorandum or copy ofa memoran- em made by you at the time. ,, Mr. Evarrs—Not by any copy of a memorandum, ', BUTLER—Yes; any copy of memorandum ‘Which you know to bea copy made-at that time. Mr. Evarts—We do net regard anewspaper as a Memorandum, . Mr. BuTLeR—Well, we may ag well have that ‘Settled, because, when.a man says “I wrote it down as best I could, and put itin type four hours from that time, and I know .1t to be correct,” Finsist that a3 a rule of law that is a memorandum from which the witness may refresh his recollection Mr. Evarts—This witness is to speak from his recollection ifhe cau. If he cannot he is allowed accordingly to refresh his memory by the memoran- dum which he made at the time, Mr. BurLeR—I deny that to be the rule of law. He ay refresh his memory by any memorandum which he knows to be correct. re The Carer Justice required Mr. Butler to reduce is question to writing. Mr. BUTLER having reduced the question to writ- ing, put it to the witness in this form:—‘I desire you to refresh your-recollection from any memorandum made by you at or near the time, and then to state ‘what was said by the crowd to the President and by the President to the crowd," _ Mr. Evanrs—That question we have objected to. The CuIFF JUSTICE askeg the witness Whether that ‘Was a memorandum made by him at the time? Witness—It is-a-copy of a memorandum made at the time. The O#IEF JusTIcE—The witness has a right to look ata paper which. he knows to be a true copy of a memorandum made at the time. Mr. BUTLER (to witness)—Go on. Witness commenced reading from the paper. Mr. Evarts. (interrupting)—We understand the con Sead the Chair to be that the witness ts allowed to rel jh his memory by looking at a memorandum Made up at the time, or what is equiv mereepan to state from his memory, thus refreshed, cwhat facts are—that he migit state it from his eee bug not read from the memoranduin, Mr. BurLeR (to witness)—Read tt. “Witness Urge a oma first interruption to the “President occu when he referred to the name of General Grant, and said he knew (hata large num- ber of the crowd dcsired to see General Grant aud to hear what he .had to say, whereupon there were “cheers for General Grant, and the President went on. The-next interraption oceurred when he spoke of the object of his visit, and alluded to the Haine of Stephen A. Douglas; then there were cheers. The next cases of interruption occurred at the time the President used the language, “I Pre on the ticket Copeuing the ticket for the dency) with the distinguished cilizen, now no anore,”” Wi ian, there were cries of “It’s a pity,” “Too bad," “Unfortunate.” The President pro- ,,, es, [know there are some to say wulor- tunat y at was thon said by the crowd? A. The President went on to a, that it was unfortunate for ‘wome that God rules on high. Mr. Evanrs, intcrrapting, sald the point made by ‘the learned Manager was this—that in following the examination of Uiis witness he could show that there were interruptions for spaces. That is the Whole guestion as 1 understand, Now the witness is ing the President's speech, which Is not yet in evidence. Mr. BUTLER—And,.as I understand tt, he ia not reading the l'resident's speech, but giving such por- Yon of it only as io show where the interruptions come ip. Now, when we comers the interruptions ‘with the porUons of the speech where you took ac- curate notes you will see why there Was (ime to take Portions of tt verbatim. The Ontky Jissiee (to witness)—Look at the } no paige aud then testify from memory at Winess—The next iaterruption that occurred was when the President remarked that uf lis predecessor hw lived — Mr. Evanre—The ques! Woe of the interrup- tions, thelr duration a: el Cause, Mr. BuTLER—I be, your pardon; I put the ques- tion, aud there was be objec ton to lt, What did the Presideat soy ¢ crowd aud What did the crowd ut’ Now Fwant (fat. (Laughter.) (VO witness)—Co ou and answer. Witness--When this remark was made the crowd respouded r! never!” and gave three cheers for Congres ¢ Vresitent went on to say:—"1 came here 1 was passing along, and being called on for the purpose of exchanging Views” — The Cie Justice (Interrupiing)—Mr. Manager, do you understand that the witness is to read the speech Mr. BUTLER—No, sir; he 18 skipping whole para- ges ud he is only reading where the interrup- us COMC4n. (LO Wilness)—Just use the latter words of the President, Witness—When the President remarked that he came here for the purpose of ascertaining what was wrong there were cries OP“You are,” and long continned cries. The President inquired, later in, his speech, “Who could pat his Qnger of any act of the, President deviating from the Tight?’ Whereupon there were cheers and counter cries of “New Orleans!" long continued. That cry Was repeated after, breecking the sentences of tre TPresideut into Paphe, gto Shen there were cries of = wat not nt Davis?” The President respond- ed, * ste § not i Jef Davis!’ Then there were sheuts 01 “Down with him!" and other cries of Hang Wendell Philips! The President seid, Why mot you hang im?’ The answers were, Give us an opportunity! The President then went ‘on 4 ask, “Haye you not a court and an Attorney Gencralt Who is the Chief Justice, and WhoJs to sit on his trial?” (Laughter in court.) ‘There then interruptions by groans and cheers. He then caid—“Call upou your Congress, that is try- ing “aye up our own government.” Tien there were offs of “Lies” among the crowd. Then there ‘Was & volce—"Don't get so mad.” The President faid— ‘i am not mad.’ Then there were hisses and two er (hy more cheers for Congress. After an- ote & nce of lis a volee cried oul—“What about Moses?’ when there was laugiter in the crowd. The hextdatervaption I recollect was when the Presi- dent dequicd, “Will you bear me?" Then We oty was taken tp and continued for wome juipiites. All this time there was great confugien. cle 8 by the friends of the President, and caunte ers, by Lose apparently opposed to President repeated his question, ask- ing the stewd to hear him for his canse and for the constitation of his country. ‘There were then cries of “Yos, yes.’ “Go ou.” In the next sentence he inquired “When, under any circumstance: violated tt) constitution of his country there were cries in response of “Never, never,”’ and counter cheers, The next interference was’ when Mr. Sewands namie was mentioned, and there were cheers for Mr. Seward. The President said he would bring Mr. Seward before pie. He asked yho was here were cries of Thad Stevens.” Th asked, “Why con't you bang Thad Stevens aud Wendell Phillipe?’ Then there were cheers and towhich hisses. The Hasident proceeded to say that, hay- | ing fought traitors at the South, he would fight them atthe North, Then there were cheers and hisses, ‘There were aleo cries when the President said he would do this vy the help of ox There were cries of “We won't give it.” ¢ interruption con- tinned i the sh of cheers, hisses and cries of the sale sort Uiroughout tbe speech, Mr. BuTLER— whether these cheers and Disses would be caatinued so as to make interruption Just for some time! A. Yes; frequently for several Minutes, Q. In that time would you be ablé to getup your fPqport? A, Twas able to make during the most of om & verbetirn repert of what the President said. Ahe-cross examination by Mr. EVARTS :~ You made # memorandum of the time of these ruptions® A. 1 did. these cries and hisses? A. 1 did. . SVille you were that i= could catch ap could your (Laughter) With pie President's g) A. YQ v, have not, i# each stetement you have a aie of these ii ih read from the newepa- pers befpe you? A | have read from the newspa- pers; link that every one of them was in the Ow epaper. not aware of it? A. I am not positive, ’ that new! ir do you recollect any of uptions’ A. J do, af of them. I shoud iable to give them without the aid of the sactnoranaom, Q. You inake a report of these interruptions on your n@es’ A, es, of all that the crowd said, Q. Notot a why notofall? A. I made notes of all Chat (was abi Q. You tgece «) catch, of ail that you were alle to 1 yet you say you were atig A. I gave my first the President, and interruption W “@) pat t Le * te o th epocily q H desir, 8, he had | u whic NeW YORK HERALD, SATURDAY, APRIL 4, 1868—TRIPLE SHEET. — ioaiaiemmattee seinen rticular part of the report as published ‘was supp! by the reporter Johnson.”” Witness—It is impossible for me to do that at this re time. Mr, BuTLER—State whether any ial part of it was sireres by_him, or whether {t was only con- nected out from my notes and connected by 1can not say whether there were any ether sentences | and rt was made hnsOh’s notes. A. Th ao r, Johnson’s; e Te) on Mr. Johnson's aotes or not. enable a persom by lot accural About four port dential party of the monument in honor of Mr. ‘Where T continued until it torn. ad I at Cleveland frot ness you in reporting would to make out a sub- te Tepo whether this witness can do it. Witness—I ‘have had considerable practice in re- that way, and can make out a substan- ally accurate TESTIMONY OF D. C, M’EWEN. Daniel C. McEwen sworn and examined by Mr. Q. What is your profession? A, A shorthand re- Q. How long. has that been your profession? A. ‘or five years, empioreg 2 September, 1866, in re- paper! was. paper? A. The New York World, Did you accompany Mr. Johnson and the Presl- when ‘went to lay the is stone A. I did. A. At West w long ou continue tA. ete ie areiv at on its re- Did.you go professionally as a reporter? A. I Had you accommodations as snch? A, Thad. & ied Fou the entrés of the Presidential car? A. Were you atCleveland? A. Iwas. ¢ bid on make a report of ue a argue speech State whether lot ractice Q. ng PI . Were you sing for any did you join the party with the ci ym the balcony? Q. How? A. Stenogra} A Q. Have you your notes here? A. I have. (Wit- | nee them.) ve you at my request copied them out since have been here? A. I have, Is this (handing a paper to the witness) a copy Q Q ofthem? <A. itis, can of ¢ tongue dd occasion, speech: fore he closed, 1 do not know how long betore the close of bis speech. whole spec Q. Is it an accurate copy from your notes? A. It Q. How Me se warcgs Posh your notes a representation of the speech? A. My notes are, I consider, very accurate, so far as I took them. Some few sentences in the were left out by confusion in the crowd; but I haye in those cases in my transcript, enclosed in brackets, the parts about which I am un Q. When they are not enclosed in brackets how are they? A, They ai correct. Sas. your report published? A. I cannot say; I took notes of the , and knowlng the lateness of the hour—eleven o’clock or after—that it was Impossible for me to write out a report of the oe and send ittothe paper I represented, therefore I went to the telegraph office after the speech was given and dictated some of my notes to other re- porters and correspondents, and we made a report which was given to the agent of the Associated Press, Mr. Gobright. Q. Did the agent of the Associated Press accom- pany the Presidential party for the purposer A. Yes. Q. Was it his business and daty to forward reports of the speeches? A. 1 suppose it to be. Q. Did youso deal with him? A, I did. Q. Have you put down the cheers and interrup- tions of the crowd, or any portion of them? A. [ have put down @ portion of them; it was impossible to get all, ‘¢ Was there not a great deal of confusion and noise there? A, A great deal. Q. Were there expressions of ill feeling and tem- eI A. I think there were. Q. On the part of the crowd? A. Yes, sir. «. How on the part of the President? A. I con- sidered that he was a little excited, Q. Was anything sald there to him by the crowd about lis keeping his dignity? A. L have not my notes, Q. Do you recollect it? A. I do not. Q. Was there anything said about his not getitng mad? A. Yes, sir, Q. Did the crowd caution him about not getting miadt A, The woids used were, “Don't get mad, Andy.” Q. Did he appear considerably excited at that mo- ment when they told him not to get mad? oer eee Said that that was nota part of the present inquir: Mr, BUTLER temarked, I want to get as much as T can from the memory of this witness and as much as I can from his notes, that, with both together, we may have a perfect transcript of the proceedings. The allegation denies that there was a scan- daious "nid disgraceful scene, the conditions being that the counse! for the President claim free- dom of speech, and we claim deceney of speech. We are now trying to show the indecency of the Mr, Evants—I understand froedom of speech in this couniry to mean liberty Lo speak properly and | discreetly. Mr. BUTLER—I regard freedom of speech tn this country as the freedom of (he private citizen to say anything in a decent manner. ir. EVARTS—Yes, it is the same thing; and who is to jucige of the decency ? Mr. BurLer—The court, before which a man is tried for breaking the laws, Mr. Evarts—Did you ever hear of a man being Wied for freedom of speech ? MR. BUTLER—No; but | saw two or three who ought to have been—(laughterj—in the court. To the witness—I was asking you Whether there was con- Siderable excitement in the manner of the President at the time he was cautioned by the crowd not to get mad? ° Witness—I was not standing where I could see the President; Lcould vot Kuow his manner; | only heard. the tone of his voice. Pa Q. Judging from what you heard? A, He seemed excited: tdo not know What his manner is, from per- sonal svquaintanee, when he is angry. Cross-examined by Mr. EVARTs— Q. Did you report the whole of the President's A. The hour was late, and I left shortly be- . So that your report does not purport to give the | t A. No, sir, Q. From the time that he commenced until this int AL Witch you Teft did you report the whole of his speeck ? No, sir. Certain sentences were broken om Sy nterruptions of the crowd, But aside from the interruptions did you con- tinue through the whole of the speech to ihe point at which you left? A. Tdid, Q. Did you make a report of it, word for word, as you supposed? A, Yes, sir, as | understood ti, Q. And dic word for word, the interrnp- tious of the aasembiy? A. T did no prinetpal exelamations; { could not he Q. And tis copy or manuseript whi dnced, when did you make tt + 1 took the iL of them. you pro- A. | made that about e or as confident in the a the lapse of two years as it id been mace when the speech was delivered? A. I oben f find that when a Speech 4s fresh in my mind 1 write iny notes with more readiness than when they become old; but as to the correctness of the report, [ think I cau make 8S accurate u Lranscript of the notes now as Lcould have done then, Q. You have nothing to help you when yon transcribe after the lapse of ttme but Lhe mores beiore your A. That is all. > And are you not aware that in phonographic writing there is often obscurity from the haste and brevity of the notations? A. There sometimes is. Redirect examination by Mv. BuTLen:— Q The counse! on the other side asked the politics of the Cleveland Leader, May { ask the polities ot the New York World ? stood them to be democrati SESTIMONY OF FE. B. STARK. Edwin B. Stark sworn and examined by Mr. Bor- LY taken afte: What is your profession? . What was your profession in 1866 A. 1 was itor in Cleveland. J was formeriy a shorthand UU report the speech of Andrew Johnson, f the United States, from the baicony of nd Hotel, hat paper? A, The Cleveland Heratd. Did you lake shorthand notes of it? A. Ye: out by you and published? A, shed as written out by you? A. It A. I have r aid. Was it writ was. A Have you your shorthand notes? or, Q. Are they in existence? 1 ne attention to them, “ih in the Waste basket, Q. Dit you ever compare the speech printed in the Heravl either with your notes or wih the manu- script? A. I did with the Manuscript that might; I compared the printed slips with the copy taken from my original pores, 4. How did it compare? A. It was the same, Q. Was it of the paper that was published nextday? A, y were just the same, with such ‘ypoqraphical corrections as were made then, Q. Have you a copy of the (Witness produced it.) ai Can you now state A. I suppose not. 1 but | suppose they were paper? A. 7 have. Whether this is a substan- tially accurate report in this paper of what ‘andrew Johnson said? A. Yes, sir, tis Menerally; there are some portions of it cut down, and t can point out Just ¥ “a? aoe places are, Q. By being cut down you mean the eu EY of the words? A. Yes, sire mentee . Does it appear in the report wi), r - stantially reported and what Dart is Verbaeln ot ) fs person but myself, i it. BUTLER—Point out what part is a RA Ly Me acenrate in the & bprtaniges Iness—Do you wish me to go over tly speech for that purpose? steht ons Mr. BUTLER ii for the present to such portions as are in the article. If my learned friends wish you to go over the rest they will ask you. Witness (commencing)—A little he specification commences im the ment. Twill read just what Mr. that point. Mr. Br7LRR—Do so, Wiiness—Ho said: Wh the woman in the co wronged? Or where piace the anger have violated, he constitution ef _iny ivat | 8 ke What reiucion docs he pro. | him come forwanl and put hie Anger upon | piedee | jointed.” ‘There were severat in. | confine myself fore where the ticle of impeach. Johnson said on is the mau living or whom | have unity the ones is Who ‘e on or one tha e ha A. 1 have always under- | A. 1 practice taw | n the night of the 3d of Sep- | ions and various remarks were made, of T have noted one, because it was the only Johnson » ay attention to; voice, “4 Je Davis!” The Jeff Davis! hang Jeff Davis! jplause terry; whic! one that Mr. Fiat ad at 5 “Why don’t your? There were then some ap| and interruptions, and he “Why don’t you?” There was again applause and interruptions, the President went on, “Have you not the courta, have you not the Attorney General? Who is your Chief J. who has refused to sit at the bg -t then age e Soierrep- tions and appla' am_ not ating: pneenl Tam not the jury; but I will you what I did do—I called on your Congress, which is trying to break up the government.” At that point there were interruptions and confusion, and there may have been words uttered there by the Presideat which 1 did not hear, but I think not. Then the President went on to say, “But let the Prejudices pass. ir. Bi to the conclusion where you re- that accurately. A. Commencing a little be- where the specification commences he says:— “In bidding you farewel here to-night I would ask 7% with 1. eg MP pated that Congress has taken calumni malign what has Con- done? Has it done anyin to restore Union of the States? on contrary, has it not done ‘everything to prevent it? And because I stand now as I did when the Febeilion commenced, I have been denounctd as a traitor, My countrymen, here to-night, who has suffered more thau'I? Who has ran greater risks than I? Who borne more thani? But Con- jous, domineering, tyrannical—Congress Undertaker, to poison the minds of the American people and create a feeling So far rentengs nee inthis fislon, “in coneequenee of the sentence here in in us manner in which I have’ distripu the public ronage.” Those were not Mr. Johnson's words, ta condensation in a summary way of the reasons which he gave just at that point for the maligning. Mr. Evarrs (to Mr. Ipeer—So You propose to put them all in? Mr. BurLER—We do. I observe in the answer of the President that objection is made that we did not put in all he said, and I mean to give all. Mr. EVARTS cross-examined the witness as fol- lows:— Q. What is the date of that newspaper you haye? A. September 4, 1866, Q. Did you make a ated phic report of the whole of the President’s speech? A. 1 did, with one Spee Q. What exception was that? A. It was a@ part of the speech in which he Gree about the Freedmen’s Bureau. It was in the latter part of the speech; somewhat into the details of figures which I omitted to take down. Q. Did you write down your notes in full? A. No, sir. i Q. And you have not now either the notes or any transcript of them? A. Only this and a newspaper. Q. Did you prepare for the newspapers the report that was published? A. I did. Q. And you prepared it on the plan of some part verbatim and some part condensed? A. Yes, sir. Q. What was your rule of condensation and the motive? A. [had nodefinite rule; but I can give the reason why I leftouta part of what was said about the Freedmen’s Bureau. Mr. Evants—That is not condensed at all? A. Yes, sir; @ part of it was not taken, and what | did take of {t 1 did somewhat condense. Q. What was your.rule in relation to what you pat verbatim into the report aud what you condensed? How did you determine what part you would give one way aud what part another? A. Perhaps | was influenced somewhat by what I considered would be a jittle more spicy or entertaining to the public. Q. In which interest? I the interest of tue Presi- dent or his opponeyts? A. I do not know that. Q. On which side were you? A. 1 was opposed to the President, Q. But you do not know where you thought the iné terest was when you selegted the spicy party A. was very careful in all those paris where there was considerable excitement and interest in the crowd to take down carefully what the President said. Q. The part In wiich the crowd was most in- terested Pats took down carefully. A. Yes, Q. And the part in which the crowd seemed to have the most interest was the part in which they made the most outery? A. Yes, sir. Q. Are you able to say that there is a single ex- |, Pression in that part of your report given substan- tially which was used by the President, so that they are the words that fell from his lips’ A. No, sir; T think .# is not the case in those. particular parts which I condensed; I did so by the use in soine parts of my own words, $4 Q. Was nol your rule of condensation partly when you got tired of writing out? A. No, sir; as it was citing between three aud four o’clock in the worn- ing, 1 was directed to cut down, and towards the last [did so, Q. More towards the last than in the early part of the speech, soas to be ready to go to press? A. Yes, sir, Mr. EVARTs—We object to this report as no report of the President's speceh. The witness avas directed to mark the paper with his initials. Mr. BuTLER—What were the politics of the Cleve- land Herald at that time? A, it was called Johnson republican; some called it Post Ofice republican; the editor of the Herald tad the Post Ofice at the time, Mr. BUTLER sald he proposed to offer the Leaders report of Mr, Johnson's speech as sworn to by Mr. Henderson, Mr, Evarts—That we objectto. The grounds of the objection are made manifest, doubtiess, to the observation of the Chief Justice and of the Senators, and are greatly enhanced wien we find that the Managers are in possession of the original notes of the shorthand writer of the whole speech and of his transcript Ynade — thereon, wnd sworn to by him, Wesubmit that the subst ton for that evidence of the whole speech thus au- thenticated the statement of Mr. Headerson, as tes- Ued to by him, is egainst the fret principtes of jus- tice er of evidence, “He has not testitied how much of the report is his and how much of tt ts Johnson's, Lesides tt ts for the great part a coudemed statement directed by circumstances. The same objection may he made to tis second HERALD report. Mr. BUTLER said—{ do not propose to argue the question, Batif we wsre trying any other case for Substantive words would not this be suilictent proot t lo Not propose to withtraw the other report of Mr. McEwen. | propose to put it im subject to be read and commented upon by the gentlemen on the other side, propose t@® put the other report in also, so that we can have all the reports, The Vost oflice report, the republican report, and the democratic report. My natural leaning woutd lead me to this pare Y report ay the one on which | mean ty rely, because it 1s ewoPh to by the party as ‘ing been w: 4 down by hiinself, publisned by Kimscif and corrected by himself, aud [ am surprised atth s—Nothing can better manifest the soundness of the ovection than the statement of the Managers. He selected by preference a report made by and through the agency of political hostiiity, aud on 4 plan of conden-ation & method of condensing Another man's notes instead of a sworn report by a Phonographer who took every word, who brings his original notes and @ transcript of them, and swears to their accuracy; and here delverately the face of this testimony as to wiry Was Said then, authentically taken, and authent: cally proved, and brought into court ‘to be verigest, the honorable Manager proposes to present us a speech hotes made and published on the motive, and With the feelings, and uuder tie induence, and inthe method which has heen stated. We object to it as evidence of the words spoken. Mr. BOTLER—L, My, President and Senator not lived too long to be astonisiied at should be surprised at the tonc in w iL a | Proposition is pat. Do L keep t | Wiese gentlemen = onybody’s — repor not give them alt the | report—ey can lay ny hands ont Am 1 obti enemy's camp? Shalt iuot use th friends and not those of my on them the reports of tay cuemies to my friene is ail virtue and p ity coutined to | democratic reports? Can they 1 ebe wrome? At one thne T tink Prestdent Johnson, if 1 recollect } aright, would not tked me very well to have looked in the Wort port for him, and when the change took pts exactly T do not know; therefore 1 have this rn Whyt Hecause it ts the fullest and compietest report. The reason why I did fot rely upon Mr. McEwen's report ts that he tosti- ed on the stand that he got Uredand went away, and did not geport ihe whole specel. ‘This that L otter ts the repiri af the whole speech, and the only oue that is, Mr. Stark swears that he lef ont. pot- tion of the speech, and Mr. McEwen swears he left © reports of m: s wien t give Frect those of out a portion of it. Leould not, ti » put these in, ML did d might be met wilh the objection that 4€ was not the whole report. [| do put in @ re port which the witness swears {s correct ‘Teport of te speech, except as to some synopsis: and then, so f § the other reports are ecncerned, A will pat them dn also, that the Preside no detriment. Here are three re; three degrees of opinion on the su ae al! to counsel, Ke EVAUTS—Diseredt is now thrown on th t authentic report, first, by the observation ‘that it Oinlis a part ofthe speech, and, second, by a sugees- tion tat itis but democra r nt can take ports, representing Diect, and we offer son's first original note: h @ condensation from these ngtes into the sp whieh the newspe Would give, aod confessediy” on the: prince of selection which the learned Manayers have dopted ja tee What they consider a ir ndly re- 01 Now, Mr. Chief Justice and senators, have — read neither of these reports: Idid not know before that the q theaticity of a stenographiec rep: stion of the mit- pended upon tue political opinion of the sienoy r We sub. mit that there is no sich evidence, no living wiles who from memory can report the Prodde: speech. ‘There ig no sich anthen bai Mr. MeBwen's whi evidence. Mr. BUTLEA—T stall not debate th than simply to fay that f hay proposition. Ithitik thiv is an ae ar as Wwe ave pub it into Tt is an accurate report—a roport—and ms riet and do trust, as accurate, perha We simply } tion of notes ny case makes tic speech T farther i tha of a him t) hot prive and when erybody here WhO Madea re} 6 authority. Noy you have it, fairly and squarely. It ts not on the ac: curacy of the = phonographers nor on the honesty of the — transcripts bat oon the | color ef th mind through ‘which tie Pres dent’s speech is to be run and by egera! condensation reproduced to the tone and temper of party. They select a condensation of Mr. tender: | civeulatea, rt, and when we offer all the reports, then he aye “You must take a given one.” To that we answer, we take the one w! has the full speech. And now, to test the suqstion,. if the gentlemen will agree not to object to Mr. McBwen's report, itis not a report of the whole speech, I will take bar Evarrs—We will not make that objection. ir. Eval 'e will not Mr, BUTLER—We want it fully understood that pred it in Mr. McElben’s report of the 5) as Ftandard and we put in the other two, 80 that if the t comes with witnesses Ra Pend the accuracy of the report, then we shall additional authentication of the other two rey ote Mr. Evarts—The learned Manager is wcatiine enough with the course of trials to know that itis time enough for him to bring in additional contradict proof of ours when we make it. a by eS you se oe report to be made’ fou make any objection’ Mr, Bvairs—-We ‘object to the two copies from newspapers, Mr, BUTLER—Very well. Tasked that that question “snouid be decided T want al! to go in, and I offer the whole three at once. see ecy a higegs said he c@tld not put the ques- ion on all three at once. Mr. BUTLER—Then ‘will firet offer the Leader's report, Tae Cuter Justicg—The Managers offer the report made in the Leader nemenepes ‘as evidence in this case. It from tl tement of the witness that the report was not made by him, but was made by him with the assistance of another person, ylose notes are not produced, and who is not produced himself as 4 pie ee Chief Justice that that r is Inadm! 2 yea demanded upon the aues- The yeas and nays were tion as to the admissibility of the report in. the Cleve- land Leader, ‘The vote was taken and resulted yeas 35; nays 11, as follows:— + nee YE. Anthony, Cameron, Cattell, Chandler, Cole, Conkling Guna. Corbet, Cragin, Brass Haman, Ferry, Fesseaden, Frelinghuysen, Menderson, J 4 Norgat Nora ior ter, Mog of Vi, Morton, Nye, Patter: son of K. omeroy, Blewart , Sumer, Thayer, Tipish, Van Winkle, Willey snd iamp—B5, Nays-—Senators Buckalew, Davis, Dixon, Doolittle, Fowler, Hendricks, Howe, MoCreery, Patterson of Tenn., Trumt and Vickers—I1, So the report was admitted as evidence. Mr. BUTLER—I now offer the report prepared by Mr. McEwen, Mr. Evarts—We make additional objection. Mr. BuTLER—We how offer the report in the Cleve- land Herald, Is there objection to that? Mr. Evarrs—It is on the same principle. Mr. BUTLER was Cains with the reports, when it ihe agreed that they should all be considered as re . . On motion of Senator Epunps the Senate, sitting as a Court of Impeachment, adjourned till to-morrow at twelve o'clock. The Senate in Legislative Session. The chair was vacated by the Chief Justice, and was immediately resumed by the President pro tem. Mr. ANTHONY moved to take up the resolution offered by him several days ago, namely, that the presiding officer be authorized to admit to a seat on the floor the reporter for the New York Associated Press during the trial of the impeachment, Mr. FERRY moved that tie Senate adjourn, but the motion was lost on a division by a large majority. Mr. Ferry—I moved to adjourn because [ am ex- ceedingly opposed to the order proposed to be adopted, Ido not think the Senate ought to grant the permission to the reporter of the Associated Press, The Associated Press>is represented by re- poets in other legislative and deliberative bodies esides Congress, and the reports of the Associated Press from uany other deliberative bodies have been and are aystamatically libels upon the principles, the olicy and the conduct of the friends of the majority in this body, ‘The avants of the Associated Press. ve- porting the deliberations of tie Constitutional Con- ventions now sitting, and heretofore sitting, {11 many of the States have systematically libelled those con: yentions and thelr members, and unless viuxe = who have the control. of that institution can prevent or will prevent such reports as have emanated from those agents, | think we ought not, in justice to ourselves gud the principles and policy we profess, to permit a reporter of the press on the floor of the Senate, Mr. CONKLING sald he was somewhat surprised at the statement, Lut was still more sufprised by their applications. This was not a question of favoritism to the Associated Press. His constituents were compelled to rely upon its reports, whether better or worse, for information from day to day touching this trial, It appeared that it was impossibie for the reporter to heat accu- rately in his present position in the gallery the testi- mony of witnesses, and now it was prop to per- mit him to draw near them, in order to give the eight hundred and forty newspapers supplied, aa he’ was informed, bythe Assoclated Press, a faithful re- port. The question was raised whether some other repovter connected with this association in some other place had or had not given @ fair siatement of the proceedings that took place there. Some Senator Suggested that it would be favoritism to accord the privilege. Mr. Conkling would say to the Senator that if it were favorjtisin it was to the entire peodie of the State of New York, as well as to the people of other State where newspapers are aud where an intense interest is felt in this trial, He would like to know upon what system of reasoning they were to exclude from the xaileries the public at large and admit certain per- Sons selected for the purpose by tickets, and yet re- fuse to @ single person such privileges as would ena- ble that assosiation to make an accurate report of the proceedings: All that he v. Conkling) knew of the reporter was that ° he repre- sented, as he had been informed, an association including some ei; hundred and forty newspapers in all parts of the coun, read by a multitude that no man can Dumber, The favoritism was to allow a single chatr within the limits of the Chamber for their benefit, Mr. ANTHONY woult, if possibie, give ali the re- porters of the press a place on the floor; but that being entirely out of the qi tion, he had Proposed to give it to a pr pe er represent. ing very much the larger number of the press, Which generally take the Senate report from the Associated Preas, The question was whether they shoutd have those reports as full and as accurate a8 possibie, He (Anthony) had himself tested the gal- and was satisfied that pos- to hear the testimony of witnesses, result was that ihe reports are imperfect, which was the very ground of the objec. tion made aguinsi the Associated Press. He had had more experience in this business than most of his associates, and would say that papers all over the country of boti parties are represented in this asso- ciation, and tf any unfair political bias were shown it would be broken up at once, as it ought to be, Mv. EvMUNps asked whether 2!i newspapers conid come into the association, or whether it was a close corporation that prevented ethers from coming in except on certain conditions, Mr. Perky sald the Associated Press was com- Posed merely of seven papers in the city of New York. Mr. ANTHONY thougnt perhaps he could answer the question better than the Senator, having had some experience in such matters. The Associated Press comprises ali the principal daily papers in New York, and taking the news from all parts of the World sold {¢ to the newepapers im every part of the country. Mr. CONRLING asked how it was sold, Mr. ANTHONY did not know, but said he thought no paper in the country that destred to take the news of the Associated Pres*, was refused. Mr. Jounson—They pay for it. Mr. Fexey inquired of the Senator did not know that they had refused some daily papers ? Mt. ANTHONY believed they ‘had thought it very wrong, but did not desire to go into questions of that Kind, He catied attention to the fact that there are focal associations in the country that have the game restrictions as the New York Associated Press had—namely, that-mo papers shall come into the As- sociated Press withont the consent of those already in; but that association sola its news to the press of the whole country. Mr. RAMSEY suggested postponing the further con- sideration of the matter for the purpose of taking up the resolution in regard to the ticket system, Mr. Haxvnicks thought there should be no diter- ence of opinion about such a question, When every nator kuew that the whole cou report of this trial upon t He heard the objection raised vy i Commecticut (Mr. Ferry) that the democrats Wad con- | trol of this association jor ihe frst time. He had sup- | Posed that it was controlled by the opposite party to a xreatextent, He knew that he had been made to | appear very stupid in some of his remarks at one | tune, That, however, he cared borg about. The great New York Journals were giving full reporte of this trial, and they were not confined to New York, but were clreulated all over the country, and these reports were real by the mass of the Péople, either from those papers of from others that copied from them, He therefore thought it was a very import- ant matter to have these reports correct, and he would vote for the resolution, Mr. DoowtTr.e satd his sense of dignity was not more offended by the reporter's sitting on the floor than by his sitting in the gallery, and he was per- fect'y willing to give the reporter a seat on the floor. M NESS moved tu adjourn. Criev of “No, No.” motion was lost in a diviston by 17 to 16, Mr. Cony#ss called the yeas and nays, | 4 THAYER raised the point of order that the yeas and nays could not be demanded after the de- w had been rendered. ‘The CHAIR, however, directed the call, which re- sulted yeas 19, nays 20, 6 Epwunns had no fault to find with the aseo- ciated press, Tt haddone him more justice, donbt- Joas, than he Was entitled to. He would yote against, the resolution, however, aa prononns, to grant a privilege to one imstituden which was denied to tts equatly worthy neighbors, other business Mr. TRUMBULL siigges'ed that some be taken up, it being manifest th, ie Senator from Connecti¢nt and others were strenuously oppoged bo ft. Mr. SUMNER—No, no, My, SHERMAN moved that to-norraw, at eleven o's yeas 2%, nays 1% } Senate adjourn untit look, Which was agreed to— Near Harrodsburg, Moaroe county, tnd., on Sanur day, @ farmer nay wnined Strain was nd dead. He went the day the house of a neighbor, Jaures Mune, | # ule from his pix ywed at tite, st MISCELLANEOUS WASHINGTON NEWS, © WASHINGTON, April 3, 1868. The House of Representatives. The House met at twelve o'clock. There were very few members present and several others ob- tained leave of absence. The Speaker laid before th@House a communication from the Secretary of the Treasury relative to the New York Post Office, which was referred to the Post Omce Committee, Also a communication from teneral Schofield relative to the expenses of elections in the First ‘Military Dictrict, which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, The House then resolved itself into Committee of the Whole, Mr. Washburne (Llinois), chairman, and proceeded in the usual order to the Senate Chamber to attend the impeachment trial, with the understanding that no business would be one on reassembling, Report on the New Pest Office and Court House in New York. In answer to a resolution introduced in the House of Representatives March 6 by Mr. Van Wyck, the Secretary of the Treasury forwarded the report of Mr. Mullet, supervising architect of the Treasury Department, as to the estimated cost, plans and material of the proposed post office and court house in New York city, which was presented to-day. Mr. Mullet doubts the prapriety of occupying the whole lot with the building, as the city might im the rear cut off all egress; that the building is proposed larger even than the prospective wants of the city, giving 188 superficial feet to each employé, whereas the most now used is in the Chicago ofice, 75 feet each. Second, the driveway is objectionable for the receiving and delivering of mails, losing much Toom at a great expense, excluding light and air from the rear of the building. Third, that there is an excessive use of iron; carpenter work and lumber will be only three per cent of the estimated cost. The interior finish of iron, while three times the ex- pense of wood, is not so beautiful, with no possible advantage. Fourth, the mode of ventilation is de- fective. The commissioners’ estimate of the cost is $8,542,930, Mr. Mullet says, with proper alterations in the plan and built of marble, the cost should be $2,495,212; while the same plan in granite would cost about $2,000,000, Escape of a State Prisoner. Private intelligence from Fort Jefferson, Dry Tortugas, stated that the notorious Colonel Green- feldt has escaped from bis prison, and left in com- pany with some soldiers for unknown parts.) It will be ‘remembered that Greenfeldt, who was formerly au officer in the British army, participated in the late war as a colonét in the Confederate ser- vice, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life, on conviction of conspiring with others to burn the cities of Chicago and Buffalo? and effect the release of the rebel prisoners confined at Camp Douglas, Chicago. Greenfeldt is connected with an influential family in England, and Lord Stanley in 1864-5 ex- erted himself to secure his release, but the guilt of Greenfeldt was 80 apparent that his efforts were un- availing. Nominations by the President. The President to-day sent the following nomina- tions to the Senate:— Hedgeman Slack, to be Marshal of the District of West Virginia. William 8. Willis, of New Jersey, to be Assistant Surgeon in the ei John Ayers and Nicholas Quintard to be Agents of Indians in New Mexico. A. K. Osborne to be Collector of Internal Revenue for the Fifth district of Wisconsin. William Murphy to be Collector of Internal Re- venue for the Sixth district of Kentucky. The Public Debt Statement. The public debt statement wil be issued to-mor- row, and as was stated in these despatches a few days since, will show a slight increase of the public debt. The Department Clerks and the Connectffut Election. A large number of leaves of absence are being granted in the several departments to clerks who claim a residence in Connecticut, to allow them to go home and vote. It is thought that almost all of the government employés from that State will en- deavor to cast their votes in the coming election. Reduction of the Clerical Force of the Trea- sury. The process of reducing the clerical force of the Treasury Department is now going on, About a dozen femaie clerks and copyists were discharged a day or two ago, and many more have beea nottied that they will be discharged. The report that other female clerks are being appointed is a mistake. No appointments of any kind are being made. Seyeral days ago Samuel Strong, a civilian, wa> arrested under @ warrant issued by Ohief Jusiwe Cartter, in pursuance of a requisition of Maj « eral Schofield, the latter asserting that it appeared that Strong stood charged with crime committed in Richmond. It will be recollected that Judge Fisher discharged Strong a short time ago, not recognizing Governor Pierpoint as the Executive of Virginia, nor Virginia as a State in the Union. Chict Juatice Cartter to-day, in delivering a lengthy opinion in the case, confited himseif to the question as to whether Strong was a refugee from the jurisdiction of Virginia, and spoke of the requisition of Major Gen- eral Schofield as being from the executive authority of that State. He concluaed by discharging Strong, on the ground that the evidence furnished did not clearly and suMiciently show that Strong was a fugi- lve from justice in the sense of the constitution of the United States, The District Attorney said Vhat he desired to have this important question tho- roughly examined, and therefore gave notice that he should procure new requisitions for Mr. Strong, with @ copy of the indictment found against him in Virginia, and afidavits from persons in that State, to show that the accnsed is a fugitive from justice. ‘The counsel for Strong said that he would be pre- pared to mee? the case, Dissolution of the Philadetplia Internal Rev. enue Board, ‘ The Philadelphia Internal Revenue Board, com- posed of the District Attorney, Surveyor of te Port, Postmaster, Director of the Mint and Assistant Treasurer of the Unjted States, has been dissolved at the request of its members, and the duties which have been performed by them have been remitted to the collectors and assessors of the various districts. Decisions in Cases of Soldiers’ Bounty and Ar- reare of Pay. The folowing decisions on eases where bounty and arrears of pay were claimed have just been made by the Second Comptroller of the Treasury :— In the case of certain foreigners who came to the United States leaving wives in Europe not heard from for years, remarried here, entered the army and were kilied, their American families alone are recognized as entitled to receive the “ars of pay and bounty; since It wonld be impossible to investi- te every foreign case presented, as it must be in the first instance, on ex parte evidence, so as ty make sure that sraud fad not been practiced, where the facilities for fraud were so numerous and dimenit of detection, A colored soldier died in the military service of the United States, leaving no wife, child, mother, or brother, but a sister, who was the claimant for additional bounty under the law of July 28, 1860. The mother had never been Married, and had been a slave. The Second Comp- trofier held that the rule of the common law does not appiy 3 that, as the statute providing for the descent of bounty makes no discrimination between the whole and the half biood or the legitimate and tilegt- timate, the ce ofmicers are precinded from discriminating against the right of the fliegitimate children to be regarded as heirs of one another in respect of bounty, EUROPEAN MARKETS. LONDON MONEY MARKET.—LONDON, April 3-5 P, M.—Consols closed at 93 a 9345 for money and ae- count. United States fivetwentles, 72); itnois Central, 1%; Brie Railway shares, 40\. FRANK PORT ROURSE.—PHANKFORT, April 3—Even- .— United States bonds closed ATM at 75%. ETROLEUM MARKEC.-—~ANPWERP, April 4.—Petro- Jeum wane Weaker at 49 francs 75 centimes for stan- dard white. Lrverroor, Corrox MAnRKET.—LIVERPOOL, P21 3—5 P. M.—The cotton market has been very active thronghout the day ahd closed strong and buoyant at a decided advan The following are the author- wed quotations:—Mitdliug uptands, tn port, 12d. 12)qd.; middling upiands, to arrive, 12d. a aad; middling Orleans, 1244, a 12% 4. The sa of the Way foot up 30,000 hates. The market has been vi active and the sales during the week just closed have reached the almost wnprecedeited figure of 165,000 bales, The advance in prices has been marked, and te quotations are at Teast 1d. per Ih Neher on American descriptions than at the close of | ‘There has been an'active demand fo yd of the above sales 49,000 8 * this purpose, against oaly 11,000 nonnt taken for speculation was Nt about 100,000 for jocal consanp- y heavy sales have materially redteed hot only of American, but of all ding to the best estimates the | re total amount in port and on shipboard at present, gp pared with ast Week, is as Tohows:— ; This Week, Last Week. Back “i 313,000 832,000 "the total stock of cot 15 | Mar sea destined for this at sea destined for this beradng nee At 382,009 bates, of which amount tng United States. a Way from different ports in RADE REPORT.—Liverroor, April 3—5 P. M.— Savion roms eee. ‘aro favorable, The mar- advancing tendency, Og ant prions tiste ee ApS 5B MeoThe Marker MAMET LIVERPOOL, ‘+ Bh t lar, te geueraliy dull, There has been a farther sieatne in corn, which closed at 408. 9d. per quarter for new mixed Western. Wheat—1és. for white California and 14s, 3d. for No. 2 Milwaukee red. Other articles Se 1M ECYISIONG Marker.—Liy: VER! el April 3-5 P. M.—Pork is active and buoyant at pret vious prices. Lard is firmer, but ‘in pee Bacon has advanced to 46s. per cwt. for berland. cut. Cheese is dull, and has declined 64., and is now anotad. 05 Oke, per cwt. for the best grades of Ameri- can fine, LIVERPOOL PRODUCE MARKET.—LIVERPOOL, Apes 3—6 P. M.—Sugar, 26s, 6d. per cwt. for No, 12 standard. Rosin, 6s. 9d-per cwt. for common North Carolina, and 12s. for medium. Tul 838. 6d. percwt. Tallow, 448. 9d. per cwt. per ton. Refined petroleum, 18. 3d. persone: 1s, pee selon. inseed mn for thin oblong, for feeding. Eos ACRE A Nees RESTORER OF A DERANGED. STOMACH TO ITS HEALTHY FUNCTIONS 18 HOFF’S MALT EXTRACT. IT GIVES A HEALTHY APPETITE AND REGULAR DIGESTION, NEUTRALIZES ALL UNDUE ACIDITY GF THE STOMACH, CURES NAUSEA AND MORBID TASTE, AND FITS THE STOMACH FOR THE DIGESTION OF THE HEARTIEST DIET. THE FOLLOWING LETTER, RECEIVED LATELY WITH MANY OTHERS, WILL. PROVE IT: | w YORK, March 31, 1868. DEAR Mn. Horr: : Please send one dozen of your Malt Extract, with bill. It: is for my son, who is something of a consumptive. Your Malt Extract has rendered excellent service to one of our friends in his trouble of the stomach, Mrs, BERNHARD, 613 Sixth street, New York. HOFF'S Depot, 542 Broadway. MEDICAL WONDER-HYATI’S LIFE BALSAM. Rheumatism, neuralgia and gout, in thelr worst stages; Acrofula, king’s evil, erysipelas, old ulcers, and the worst Cases GF fiseases of the biood, great debility, liver c talnt, Kidneys, waltrheum, Sc, &e., are most certalaly cured by (his nratr 2 ESAM gured Mr. Joseph MeLanglitn: aft i wy he hiya ll | z «Tres HYAITS LIFE Ba. eS of mercurial scrofula after it ut destroyed @ parvor tl those and eaten holes entirely: through tne FOS of Yoowoutn : He was then (1867) reeiding in Philipsburg, be phys cian had abandoned the case and his friends thougus Bint! Siding state, when hia brother advised him to try the Balsam, one'bottle of which enabled him to leave his ba and corte to thiscity, In one month he was entirely cured. Inguire at street, YATT'S LIFE BALSAM perfectly cured Mr. William Springer, 188 Broome street, of inflammatory rheumatism of 50 severe a character that he became deraiged. He could Bot ft his Sani bis head, and was conined to his bed 1 aiine Lite Balsame has been tested by the public durin; cigiteen years, and these are two cases olit of an buadred thousand which it has cured. iis 4 certain curative for Fistula'in all curable cases. Principal depot 240.Grn or six for $6, a MERICAN PO! FURNISHING AND Hat Establishment, now opened at the old stand of VAIL, THE HATTER, M41 Fulton street, where “a new or- der of things” in the Hat and Men's Furnishing Trade can be n and feltin such an unmistakable ‘man AVE LO doubt “Wamsutta,” £240; “Lonsdale,” $2 thing Ike them ever seen at the r ‘ n 10; excellent Linen Collars, $1 per dezen; Gray's mou aper Collars, 25 cents. Novelties in Scarfs, Bows, Glove ‘&c.; an immense variety at prices which-can be seen no- where clse. Hats in endless tis Ae than anywhere ‘The cheapest best Hats and the bestcheap Hats, VAIL'S valled Silk and Gossamer Hats juced. HOUSEHOLD WORD. Now fs the time to purchase Refrigerators, Ware, Cutlery and Kitchen Utensils, and th thein ‘best aud cheapest Ie at KE. D. BASSFO! stores, Cooper Institute, New York. TTENTION, SOUTHERN, WESTERN MILLINERS AND others.—Peckhain'’s Hair Bazaar, 251 Grand street, near Bowery, N.¥. The cheapest house in the city for Human Hair or Mohair Goods. Bratds 44 % per dozen; Chignons 86 60 per dozen. STHMA-SPECIFIC.—DATURA TATULA GIVES IX- stant relief. Tina, 2s, 6d., 6s. and 10s, md © aretter, boxes, $s. 8s. and 5s. SAVORY x MOORE, Chemist to the Queen,’ New Bond street, London. A WOPRCULARS AND INFORMATION FURNISHED IS + all legulized lotteries, J. CLUTE, Broker, 176 Broadway and 153 Fuiton, BSOLUTE DIVORCES LEGALLY OBTAINED IN NEW ‘York und States where denertion, drankenneas, dc. are Suificleut cause; no publicity; no charge until divorce ob- tained; advice free, M. HUWES, attorney, &¢., 78 Nassau sb. preva - water: cate tt on enuess or desert suificlent cause. No Ja advance; advice free, . Counsellor dackh Lottery of Kent BIL, ApEn, 8 1888, vata Bh My ly 10. Avait 3 18087 3, Td boy 6 25, 4H. OUv, COLTON & GO., Managers. For cireulars, &c., fn the above Lotteries address MUKKAY, EDDY & CO. Covi Beers WaRRanri jar because re.iabi Plant them always, Almanac tor Isis ‘at mailed free, We deliver ali orders in New York freight paid. Aduress Robert Bulat, Jr., Seed citower, Philadelphia, n 4 for Boist’s Garden Madual and Gardeners’ Price Current of Seeds, RDI ARE “POP' Piaut them once and you wi EAUTIFUL GILT GRANT CAMPAIGN BADGES, 1A which for teeny go eres cannot be omen ents make from day; cent, Send us conta for satpics unt elrculat to BLOOD & CO. 335 Wharton street, Philaleiphia, Pa. YORNS, BUNIONS, ENLARGE JOINTS AND ALL ) diseases of the feet cured by Dr. ZACHARIL, 760 Broad- way (OR SALE—A SODA AND MINERAL WATER MAR- ble Fountain, ail cornplete; will be sold eheap. Apply. At drug store, 24 Chambers street, corner of Centre. REAT BARGAINS ARE OFFERED DAILY IN Coffees, Mackerel, Mol and all kinds of Groceries and Provisious al 260 and $82 Crbenwiel Street, corner Murray, New York, THOMAS B, AGNEW. NoRtons WORUESTERSHIRE JOCKEY “CLUB SAUOR. A delicious condiment for meats, fish, gnine, salads, Ac. Sold by eyocers.. Hotels supptied by the xallon. ORTON & ANDKEWS, Proprivtors, 648 Greenwich st. ONS TO INDISPOSITION MISS BARTON WILL NOT J speak foway Mail tsi ing, a8 advertised. DECKHAM'S HAIR BAZAARS. GREAT DEPOTS FOR sale of Human Hair Goods. Beantifnl Hratds $3: eto- Gent Chignony 45. Call and see. Grand street, near uwery, New York, and corner Fourth aad South Nioth, Wilhamsburg. ‘THB RELIOIO’S PRESS mers of HELMBOLD'S FLUID EXTRACT BUCHU. Remarks from— CHRISTIAN INTELLIGENC Elbert 8 Porter, editor; PATIATING ON THE ies V'an Wyck, publisher. Jesue dated New York, February 27, 1868, What a bieesing tt may prove to the reailers of the “ Acrial Tale,” the Lost Image. The moral and physical manti- nese, whieh ts lost through pop jax vices, can easily be foutKd by the use of this Panacea, taken in connection with Rose ‘Wash, THE EVANUELIMiy, J. G. Craighead and H. M. Field, editors. March 30, 1968, Observing an editorial In the Intelligencer of above date, tt Saye :—Take no more balsam, mercury, oF unpleasaet tn Cines for unpleasant and dangerous diseases, the rev viee grown wenk through execes, &e. THE AMERICAN AGRICULTURALIST. Orange Judd & Co., Proprietors, See April number, They baving seen my adveriisemen with ite uses and merite, HELMBOLD'S EXTRACT BUCHU. A full description of ite marvellous powers, and carerad diagnosis of the state of thore who are supposed to need ity finds ite best supporters in the puiiishers of the CHRISTIAN INTELLIOE Ni THE EVANGELIST and THE AMERICAN AGRICULTCRALIOF. The editorials tn the abovey sot | | }) are fully acquaintes L| ve papers were entirely unsli- cited by mey in fret, 1 ih ¢ No personal acquaintance with any of thelr put il eufTerers wiil do well to call on them before purchasing in order to obtain falter information. Hi. T. AULMBOLD, 604 Broadway. Dernggitte upwards of and mannfartirare of Heimboja’s Genuine Prevasa 7