The New York Herald Newspaper, November 20, 1855, Page 1

THE NEW YORK HERALD. WHOLE NO. 1023, MORNING EDITION—TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1856. OFFICIAL CORRUPTION. Whe People vs. Syducy H. Staart, City Judge. COURT OF OYER AND TERMINER. Bofore Judge Roorevelt, SIXTH DAY'S PROCREDINGS, Mornax, Noy. 19.—The public interest that has been manifested to such an unusual degree in the progress of this extraordinary case was again exhibited this morning, in the crowded condition of the court room, and in the ‘expression of Ceep interest \hat is legible in the counte- napces of the Court, counsel, jurors and spectators. It was understood, that for the purpose of getting through the caso, the Court should sit till 6 or 634 ‘o'clock, taking @ recess of hulf an hour, Masguzet M. Connolly recailod to the stand, and her cross-examination continue! from Friday, Mr. Brady, (10 witness)—I think you told me you dit not know billen Cox’ A. No, sir; I ld you I did know ‘her Q. That is Mrs. Burtis, is tt not? A. Yes, sir, Q. Low Jong have you known her? A, I cannot state the exiet time how’ long 1 have been acquaiated with Tr. Q. Five or six vents? A, I would not like to say, because Lom not certain of the time; it is over two years, and I canrot say that it {8 as mony as five. Q THd you rst know her by the name of Ellen (ox ? A When’! first knew hor she went by the nawe of Mra, ‘ox; {did not know ber hushand; I knew her by the name of Mrs. Burtis about a year or six months after I first’ knew her; she visited me as Mrs. Burtis, and called to see nie ss Mrs. Cox. Qe Vid you know what kind of life Mrs, Burtis ted? A, 1 do.not—not to my recollection. Q. Do you know what is called © pagel thet? Al don'{ imsw as { do—you had better explain the mutter to me; tomy recollection I don’t know what it is, @ You have heard of a kiad of stealing, have you not, where a woman goes out ana brings home a man, ud a thief enters into the room by means of « panel the wall and robs him? A. [don’t recollect as Le’ heard of it; I did not know Mrs. Burtis as a pauol thi I do not know that I know a person of the mame of Daniel Wilton, und called Nutch Men; [do not know a woman of the name of Julia Wilson; there were 40 many boarders that J cannot charge my recollection; I do not recollect that this Dutch Dan ever paid her board; 1t might have ‘happened. and slipt from my recollection; I doa’t know this Dutch Dan, whether he was a hotel thief. Q. Do you recollect a man who came from Troy and ‘a your house? A. That is something [never tried to recdlleet, who called at my house. Mr. Brady—You will probably recollect the fact, when you are told that the man who came from Troy made you ‘a prevent? A.--No, sir. Q—Did you know John Hawkins? A —No, ste, I did not; I knew him not by that name, but by ths name of Johnny Williams; I do not know what his’ business was; { had very short acquaintance with him; officer Hopkins brought im tomy house; hy odcaped from the officer in wy house; I do not know howfhe got out; I saw them both in the ball; I recollect of Jobony Williams starting to go down to the front basement, and the officer go with him; that la the last I saw of him. . —Did not Johnyy Williams start down the basement and did not the officer start after him, and did it not n by accident that you were on the stairs be- tween the officer and Jobuny Williams, and tha! the offi- cer thus lost his prisoner? A.—I haye no recollection of that; I raw them both go dowa stairs; I never saw Jobu- ny Williams afterwards; the officer came back and ar- Tested me; he was angry because he lost his prisoner, and he tried to te me for his own negligence; | ; don’t know whether he ia living or dead; I never knew him to be in any business excep’ as @ clerk in a steamboat office; I cannot state where that steamboat was; it was not the Qunard s'eam line; I think it was the Fall River route; he visited my house occasionally; I do not remember of his being arrested and convicted for breaking open a trunk on one -of the Canard steamers; I reco/lect the police searching ‘may housetor Me. Burtis; that was in 1848, at the corner Grand and Laurens; they dia not find Bartis; the name of one of the office's who made the search was Norris. Q. Tom Jackson was drowned, was he not? A. Tam ‘not personally acquainted with that; I dou’t recollect now of bis going to sea—to Kingston, Jamaica, in a sail- ing vesecl, with Fish; that the vessel was wrecked, and ‘Tom Jackson drowned and Fish saved; 1 cannot place my eeollection with that fact. Q, Did he wot live with you up to the time he left for ea) Witners—i declice answering that question, Q. And you ray you d> not recollect hearing what was ‘his fate? “A. I might have heard it, but I do not recollect 2 Q. Did you not go into mourning for Jackson’s death? Witness—-I decline answering that question. Q. Did you vot tell persons afer Jackson’s death tha ou werd in mourning on account of the death of your usband? A. I Jo not recollect; I do not know that Con- ‘nolly wos in State prison that time, Q. Did you ever that Jackson was dead at all’ A. Yes, I heard of his death. Q. How long after you heard of his death did you se» ‘Connolly fir A, Tcaunot state the exact time. Q. Waa Connolly living with you at the time yor ‘ought that house in Broome atreet’ A. He was; Lem loyed Mr. Smith tosearch that title; I do not recollee fiat Connolly went with me to a me Smith to searcs ‘the title; 1 iad to sue the tenant for the rent; I do not remember who was the lawyer; it wis not Mr, Smith, it waa Mr. Ccuy, a gentlerau in the same office with Mr. Smith. Q. When Connolly was arrested, did Mr. Smith propose ‘to become his bail? A. No, sir. Q. Did he propose to procure bail for him’ A. Not to my recoliection. @. Did be ever = that he would procure bail for ‘Connolly if you would assign to him the title to that house? A. I do not recollect of bis making any such pro position to me. @. Did he ever make any «uch proposi'ion as, that he would in any way aid in procuring some person to go bail for Connollyr A, Not to ny knowledge, sir. Q. Who Was the first person to whom you ever said ‘that you hed given money to Stuact im connexion with your busband's case’ A, Mrs, Edgar, sir; I showed her my bark book. Q. Who was the next? A. My husband. Q. Who was the next’ A. Mrs, Edgar’s husband. Q. Who was the next’ A. I donot recollect any far- thor until I told it to Mr. Hall; at least 1 did not tell it Hail till | went before the Grand Jury, thea I told H ight have told Mr. Hail the night that I came from Boston and saw him at his house; I do not recollect it, bat I think I did. . Q. Since you were here on Saturday (meaning Friday), sid anybody show you the evidence you gave bofore the Grand Jury’ A. Nobody showed {t to me; I read it my- self; 1 thought I would be particular, because you asked me whether i had read Mr. Cutling’s speech. Q. Since you were here on Friday, did t evidence you gave before the Grand Jury? Witness—Yes, I cead it in the papers (witness correcting herself), No, sir; L thought ycu referred to the evidence I gave here; nobody has shown me the evidence | gave belore the Grand Jury; nobody read it to me; TI have uot since talked with anybody whatever about it—peither wish Mr. Hall, Mr. Cutting, Mr. Smith, nor anybody else in the world; I nave not written anything down about not heard arything writte Brady) are the lest person I have e it. & I want to see whether [ made « mistak ‘estimony ia one point: you stated that Judy turned you $100; that he sail he woull give yon the whole $500, and promised to give you $100 a month; this you said on your direct examination; and afterwards you said he gave it to you to operaic oa ‘Kerr—how is that ¢ A He cave me that money, aud told ine, “You will ha to give this Kerr something.”’ he mentioned no particu- fine et; but afer | hac seen Kerr I told bin the alert mace nels J jteld Fou on my Gross-examination that be said that he gave tt to me to operate on kerr: I reid over the evidence so as to be able to give youn dis thoet answer, } @. Did you in what you read find any question which you then Geciived to answer, which you now wish to an ever’ A. No, sir. . Js there anything you stated which you now wish to a read the alter! A. No, sir ; 1 read the statements of the case io ail the Sunday papers, and on Saturcay I read the report of my evidenge In the Himmat» and daily Times, Do you want to correct one word of the report in either of those papers, and ifso, doit now? A. I don’t inink | want to correct anything in 1t now. Mr. Biady—Then that navs a gcod deal for the cxrreet ness of the report. Did Judge Stuart assign eny other reason for returning that first $100 than it you have stated to the jury! A. He did not then stave it; it was the weond $100 that be gave me when he prom(sed to turn ft al! back to me. wea. With reference to either of the $100, did he ray any- thing else which you wih to state to the jury? A. 1 40 tly recollect whether he did or not. Q..tid you ever say to snrbody tha! Judge Stuart handed you $100, saying that Mr. Hall did not want to be too herd on you?’ A. I don’t remember ; | do not re- coleet that {said so before the Grand Jury’; I do recol that Judge Stuart said that Me. dmith was embittered against him that Mr. Hall could not do as be ‘would jike to, and tat whet hhaé been dane for me should owe a» an act of charity. *f Tid you swear in the Grand Jury room that when Stuart gave you $100, or any other sum, he told you that Mr. fisil did not want to be too hardon you’ A. Ido not recollect it; I would not have stated it except It was trae, I might Lave sald something Ike it, but not ex- «ed in that manner. Pre Did stuart ever say so to you? A. Ido not recollect ao. 008. tell A. Ouke that when Stuart a Ti pono Oa Ba at, east the house, corner of Watts and Varick; Me. Burtia came after March that was; {t was di not true, however, that I hved wit then at 152 Greenwich street, with a Mr. and Mrs. at that rune I said I would never live rgain, and never keep a jeotl ? houre jin; and I tended to do 40; 1 do not recollect that I said 1 or ous life, you give out, at that time, to Stuart or others, at Jou setended to reform? hE eo quai’ would never eoping ia, Dut Ihave no recollection that f told Stuart exprowty 10; as long a8 I conducted myself propeely, and lived re- spectably, I did not consider but that i was doing tho same as all other people do. Q. Did you make any distinctionin oe mind between not keeping a boarding house and leading a respecta sle life, and did you tell Stuart soY A. I might have told him to, but 1 do not remember it; Thave seen a man of the name of Edgerton; Teanno: state where he lives; 1 think he lived in Providence, R. I, when T inst knew him; Ido not recollect the exact time that I was last in Pro- viderce. Q, About when? A. I never waa there but once and thet is in the vicinity of two-and-a-bulf years; ff am certain Thave vot been in Philadelphia within the last year; I have passed through inthe cars different timos, but never to stop, I co not know whether Edgerton was married or not; I'do not know whether he has wuy busi- nias or not; T do not recollect who introduced him to me; {agerton never boarded at my honse. G. Did you ever stay at his nouse? lead a A. T called on him when in Providence, @. Did you ever stay in his house a wook at a time? A. 1 did not; I stayed in his house two nigrta; there was a weman in the house. Q, Was there another woman beside you ¢ A leng paure und no answer. Q. Have you seen her within « month? A. Not to my Knowledge; T never heard anybody say that ho was & thie Q. Have you and Connolly, or has either of you, been stopping at Fgerton’s plase within two months? A. No, rir; Tao not know where Fgerton is now. @. When you went to Recorder Smith's office, from whose house did you go; was it from Mr. Moore's? A. 1 was not stoppingat Br. Moore's; I went there on busl- ness; never stopped over night in the house; that was after me, ond fouvd me on the stoop, and fcom there he went to the Recorder's office; Bartis had gone to my sis- fer’s, and my sister divected him there; Yio av rioed- lect whether I was then stoppiog im Harrison street or Lisperard street. (After a pause.) Yen, I was stopping in Harrison street. tag Where did you reside ia Boston? A. That T cannot jel. Mr. Brady—But you must tell. Witness—But I will not tell. (To the Judge.) Tean- not expose where [live in Boston, to have my neighbors Jook upon me with contempt when I veturn; 1 cannot do it. me By what name did you go in Boston? A. I decline ing. Mr. Brady (to the Court)—I insist upon her answering both questions—where she lived in Boston, and by what name she went, Mr. Cutting denounced the way in which the dofence were acting in thix examinati He had even, he said, borne with exemplary patience the impertiaence of per- sons sitting round the counsel—some of them official and suggesting questions. But, said he, I may call upon one of there officia's and find out what he knows. Mr. Brady denied that any person around him had mece suggestions. Mr. Cutting—You have not heard them? Mr. ee the person. Mr. Cutting declined. Mr. Brady—hen | say that the statement ts<—ut- terly without foundation—that not a single official, high or low, bas suggested a single question to me in t care. The only official near him was Alderman Drake, and be certainly made no su in, Mr. Cuttirg insisted that Court should iaterfore with the cross-examination, and tthe witness from. being sompel'ed to answer questions having ne bearing on the case but which would tend to her among ber neighbors. Mr. dy would be the last person to do anything which would hinder a woman from returning to the Han! of virtue, but he was not to be imposed upon by bypocriny and the pretext for reform. He wanted to show by Ler civulging her name and place of reacence that she is leading a fe in Boston quite the opposite of a virtuous one. Witnes:—When we went there we did not dare to go by wy husband’s name, for fear of arrest; we do not now go by that name, and as many ladies have called upon me, I do not want to be thought little of by co Q. What name did you go in — AI gave the name of Conway to my buthe made » mistake and got my right name. Q. What is the name of your landlord in Boston? A, I do not recellect, sir; it was not I who hired the house; it was my husband; that tenement was kept by my eldest sister; I believe there is a written agreement for two ‘ears abi ut the house; I did not read it, and cannot tell ‘he meme of the landlord. Q. Did not your husband hire those premises in his own name? A. He said not, sie. Mr. Brady could not conser t to have his questions as to witners’s name and residence in Bostom remain unan- swered, if be had a legal right to have them anawered. Witness (to Mr. Brady)—1 do not know the Chicf of Po- lice i Boston. Judge Roosevelt considered that as the witness had gone go far in her anawers, she might with propriety go further, but, neverthéless, he could not say that she was legally bound to answer ‘Sh Brasy promixed to prove that the house where the witness lives in Boston is the house of a panel thief. Judge Roosevelt considered that where so much is Ynown of the character of the house, it must be known where that house is. Mr. Brady—Oh, we know all about it; but we want to contradict all that this witness says or intimates about her course of life in Boston. Judge Roosevelt—Then [ think it is unnecessary to in- sist on this witness answering questions which she thinks may be cerogatory to her character, Mr. Cutting suggested that there waa nothing in the threat of coupsei on that print, as all these collateral matters, where answers are given, are conclusive. Judge Roosevel. would recommend the witness to an- swer both questions, but would not insist upon her doing #0, for the reasons she stated. Exception taken to the Judge's ig. AJuror—Will the witness answer as to the street or Josality of the place? Witnese—Well, Boston is a different city from New York, and if I were to tell the street everybody would know me, particularly as being a stranger; it is near the State House where I am living. Q. In October last were you ia company in thiy city with Mrs. Burtis aud Lydia Van Tassel? A, I called upon Mrs, Bortis, Mr. Brady—Yes or no ? Wi ness—I cannot answer in that way. Judge Roosevelt—Certainly the witness has a right to ouswer how she was in company with her. Mr. Brady—Certainly she has not. Judge Roceevelt—Certainly the counsel and Court do not agree. Q Did you see Lydia Van Tassel in the month of Cetoder let’ A. L think I did, at her house: I went oat on business, and when | returned Mrs. Burtis was there by appointment. Q. Were you present when either Mra. Burtis or Lydia Van Tosse}, in October last, was arrested for stealing / A. [do not know what they were arrested tor; they not inform me what they were arrested for. | (Wit going on to tell a story$of Mrs, Burtis, and her baving met and made an appointment to meet at Mrs. Van Tassell’s. Mr. Brady, (interruptiog)—tI would like very mach to have a long conversation with you somewhere else Witness—Well, I don’t know that [ would bare any long converswtion with you ©. Where was that honse? +A. The house was at the corser of Dominick and Varick j 1 do notk what officer made the arrest. There were other there belonging to the Van Tassel family. Mrr. Von Tavsel; they did not take ber out of t * ther otlkcers and myself into one room, ai pt Mrs another room: both the office officers went away and left Barth an Tas and this woman out together; then one ot those officers atepped np aud eked me my name, and I stated to the oiicer that my naxoe was Margaret M. Asceosio; that I eame on from Boston on & visit; that my hasband and brother had gone to the Mint in lbiladeiphia; | walked away and WR [ycia Van Tossel in the house, I did ave the city tll about two weeks atter; I went to 47 Lispenard treet and slept there that night; Mr. Edgar lived there they mcved from Greenwich street there. A Juror.—What does Mrs. Edgar do? nished rooms to gentlemen, Q Lid you Tate aman named Launcelot lendieton’ A. 1 did not know such a man, to my knowledge; I work ed out at cervice im Albany after I left my native place: I did not to my knowledge keep house there; I do uot know that Pendleton kept house there. Q. Did you live inany house there, the keeper of which was indicted? Witness—I decline to answer A. She lets fur Q. Did you tell Stuart you were Hving in Boston’ A. | did not tell Stuart that I was living in or in Philo Celphia, [teld him I was staying part of the time with my brother in the country. Mrect examination resumed. Q And you have stated the reson of that was that you did not ike —— hia——— place of residence to be known’ A. Yes, siz. ‘ @. Have you seon Jas. Clark in court’ A. You, sir. Q. Isbe in court now! A. Yes; there he is—pointing him out—he was in court at the time the question was asked; he first told me that pow omey aed —— and E E 5 you ‘was in compeny with Cou: olly, in the New York Hotel, at the time the bur- glary was committed? A. Yea, sir; he told me he was, pnd that be bad made his escape; he told me that he ‘aud Judge Stuart were intimate. Q. You have been into & long story of the re- cent arrest of Lydia Van and you were going to ex in whet brought row te bar Bows om, now, and tell the gjury’ . Burtis had left a day or two that for Boston, snd Mrs. Burtis expected o Jetter from him, I went down to see whether she had got Tm ising! ifecrl a ESE ieee i atthat Marke vas prompting anrt’ A Teww Mim passing papers at the time ‘ may be capes ghigpe e oe If you are to bacriflco enough to state what street lived in Boston, 1 ish mn woud o,t0. me Vitness—It f were to tell you the atreet, we being rtlculgsiy jm the, Pepadtablorsacte of tie 8 FO particul mm the res ts Iivelnear the State Hose, — recommendation to the Mr. Brady objec'ed to the recommendation. Mr. Cutting (wiih warmth)—May my tongue be palsie! before 1 ask her to damn herself; rather may those whom | believe to be guilty escape the ‘punishment due to thelr crimes, *ban that T should ask this woman to damn hope: and intentions chat are pure and holy, Mr. Brady did not want to see thove dramatic outbursts ina case like this. He intimated that though Rachel’s engagement had cloeed here, he did not want to see his learned friend take her piace ; Mr. Cutting (to witness)—Have you not stated, and Ix it not a fact, that no minntes of evidence were taken in the Grand Jury room? A. sir; I have not signed my to any evidence there; I do not recolleet of their bei ng read to ine; T have not spoken to you (Me. Cutting) or t trict Attorney, since Friday fast. ‘This olosed the testimony of Mrs. Connotty, ‘and on her teaving the stand, Mr. Cutting told the witneas to give her aan ere ehe could found tn Gann wanted, as he presumed the Jim Gallagliers, tain Greens and others were to be put on the stand. Mr. Brady utterly objected to all these dramatic repre- sentutions, which were got up for effect. ‘The next witness called for the prosecution was Rey. Beury E. Montgomery, (the clergyman who married Mr. and Mrs, Connolly, in Philadelphia).—Witneas—1 am minister of the Gospel of the Protestant Episcopal Chiro! in Apnl, 1883, } resided at the corner of Tenth and Fits” weter strects, Philadelphia, then known as Moyay ; my parish was that of All Saints, Moyamensing; 1 duce the parieh register of that chureh: in April, Bs, the 29th, I married Wm. Peter Connolly to Margaret Mary Murphy; this is the original entry; Ihave « private ac account book, where his name is entered; the date ear- responds with that in the parish registry; (certificate bonded to witness) ; the endorsement on that is mine; the signature is mine; the word Apnl ia written over the word Muy; the alteration ix a correct one; 1 am almost certain it ls not inmy handwriting; I'have nov the slightest recollection of the transaction. Dross-«xagpined by Mr. Brady—It is obvious that the ink veed in the alteration ix of a different color from the other; Lhave not the slightest recollestion of the altera- tton in date deing made by me; I have no recollection of correcting a marriage certificate after the night that I gave it, nor have I avy specific resollection of duing it at the time; Ihave not, tomy knowledge, eon, eithor of there parties since; 1 have scon the witness in Court, but being a little near sighted, Lam unable to say whether that is he person. Mr. Brady would wish witness to be allowed to look at ber lonely, to seo whether she is the xarne person he hat married. Witzexs to the Court—The endorsement was mide by me, 1 beliéve, at the time, To Mr. Cutting—What impression does the difference of color in the ink make on your mindy A. It is barely possible vhat I may have aipped my pen in anothor iakaitand and written the word “April” withit. The letter P on the en- Coreement is a shade darker than the other two words, “ Willlean”” and ‘ Connolly.’? Q. Is there a greater or difference of shade between the letter P,” and * William’ and “Connolly” than there is between the words ‘April’? and “Muy?” A. The difference in shade between the letter ‘ P” and the other words is, I think, greater than tho difference be- tween the word“ April” and the word © M Mr. Cutting—Be good enough to look at the words “Margaret M. Murphy’? on the endorsement and ‘20 April, 1863,”” in your register, and say what difference of shade there is between them’ A. The shade in the parish register is slightly darker than the other. Mr. Montgomery #as then conducted into the office of the District Attorney to seo Mrs. Connolly and decide whether she is the same whom he married on 29th April, 1853. Mi » Coneely had, however, left the office, and he did not see ner, Witness (on dee ox f to the coe — “tet ar by my register that any marriage took place before Tre on the 20th of May, 1853. Doctor Joseph B. Sabine next took the stand, and was examined by Mr. Cutting 1 aim the aya of the New York pital; keep a Seetocsslourest table of the weather. (Mr. Brady suggested that the pro- secutor should have called Meriam.) 1 take a note of the barometer, the thermomevr, aud the wind three times a day, between nine in the morning ond Sand 9 in the evening; on the Mth of Fedr 4 1855, there was rain; I cannot tell you tho state of ths streets; I have no snow stated since the 9th; on the th there war now; 10th it was clear; on the 11th it was clear; on the 1201 sas mow part ofthe da ; and it was clear part of the day; on ths 18th it was part clear and art snow; on the 141 was rain all the day and, | lieve, all the ri on the 15th the wird was north- cast; it was on a Thurséay, Cross-examined by Mr. Brady—Was not in the habit of riding down in the Wall street omnibuses at that ard do not know whether the streets were so with encw and ice ou that day that rs had 8 t out at Naseau street ard walk down; on the 15th there was fog an¢ mirt all the day; I do not know wheth ex the streots were impeded by ice on that day. Mr, Cutting offered to prove by the Clerk of the Supe. rior Court a record of judgments, as follows:—One by Joseph L. White for” $914 64,’ domages and costs —sum mons ond cemplaint 20th, November, 1854—fled on the 224 December, 1*64, on which an execution irsued and was returned by the Sheriff on the 2id February, 1865, with a return endorsed on it—satisfled 224 Februa 1y, 1856; anda record of a judgment, at suit of Mchard W. Horn and others, eguiast Sidcey H. Stuart, toc $147 87 domages and costs, Olea 20th March, 1855, ‘There evidence Counsel said he would fotlow up by proof pots which strangers, it would be Thin asm city; of assignment of salary in advance, to Judge Stoart owed. ‘Mr. Brady inti Jed that if the prosecution wanted to prcve poverty against Judge Stuart, he supposed they might prove it; he was not aware, however, of the cou nexiog between poverty aud crime, and he eupposed that any and ull proof intended to show that Jadge Stuart was ip a state of pecuniary necessity was altogether in admissible. Mr. Cutting informed the Court that he offered this tes Umony so asto cutoff an argumeht which might be made to the jury, #« tothe improbability of the story that aman with a large salary, and not in necessitous cireumstances, would have reesived #500 to procure a notle prosequi in his own Court againxt a criminal, He propored to chow that Judge Stuart was then so greatly Karnrred, that he had the Sheriff at hie heels with execu tions for the paltry sum of $14 and $141. He wanted to meet and rebut any argament that might be mae as te the iwprobability of Judge stuart being actuated by any such motive as the sum of $600. Mir. Brady recognised that it was not altogether new but it was Improper to introduce evidence to meet auy poreible argument ; still be would assure the Court that bo such ergument woold be put forward. Judge Koorevelt—-Thi case depends fe for | ite leading | fact on the testimony of one witness, who is not, or cer nly he Ever: * not been, e, therefore to} cf entirely anspotted charactor hich ean purened by credit ething like # probability that the testimony of | quires to be to @ great extent, or pe intent with itselt chnowledged the rece cd= f the hers is true, or it might, at all events, be weighed aya | nce with all the reat. It atrikes me, therefore, | that the evidence tx admissible. Testimony of the kind | given by this Mrs, Covnelly of necessity requires to bo | | fortified, andr k but excepted te tting--Am 4 ight, had nover on ness transactions him, 1 did hold an ws signment of bis ralary io aavance, 1 was paid to me, and I returned the to the Comptrotier of toxes, the man who paid Ji aart’s salary, this wos the Ist of July, 185% f his salary for a counted with bia name on it: J got the ige Lothrop, the former police magistrate. | { Judge Stuart's; that order was given to Judge Lo counted that order. stimony. Judge Lothrop ew all the facts, and might be called. ge Roo he would whole testimony, exeept that the witness had an order for $876 and received Witness recalled— throp. Q Did you at any time, and when. obtaln any money frow the Comptroller, ax and for the salery of Judge Stuart? | Objected to, admitted. and exception ta'cen. Witnere—I received from the Comptrotier #875, which emount ladvanced to Jaége Lothrop; | 4) net kno bat object; it was on the let of Jaly, 1856; I delivere itten order for sueh to the Comptrolier; that written yer was bought by me of Judge Lothrop, on the 6th o/ Mareh. Milton Arrowsmith, examined by Mr. Cutting. Text mony objected to aa wholly irrelevant. Witners—i am teller of the Seamen's Ban fer Savings of the ‘York; have been such since September, 1848; named Margaret M. Duval he! and pow has an i with our band; | cannot rate ‘Account; this pass-book (handed t) original entries; om the one side the reerived a paper from Judge Is ‘A, Juror—De the original of her name on the the or! Mr tame ae wow u raved. To another Juror—That account benk. there is lores tn the all the oy 6 drawn out the book vot mm done, but —as j Thnow of no other account which Jackson was «hotel thief, his associates were | of Mag Duval; tht was ber common name; I have been ‘and Uknew dtin igerton, he was | at hew house repes ‘edly—1 suppose a dugen the woman should now chang) her upoase do not know hape nwre; Twas oct an aancciate of tite persons | Aare on geownnt in bam che bueow Capt. Green, & hotel thief, I d ‘went there; I knew « “ne that went there; T from the Let of st; | that T know ie T don't koow a man ofthe | ray of them im partion r; I don’t know that be oounte”afivotiag’ ta: Pome of Mor saw any of thee persons in | ( alin in Greene; 1 do not of the money. ‘Mra. Duvnl's Hy thle over knew go in there | particular any thief that.’ telked with in Prevent his or her pac | wae Win, Moo thief; he is in Bowtom now, | | cannot mention the name o.{ any that] new evidence to us; but in care | believe; he wns fi prism in Jersey Cty n year ago, wud | been tthe bate of goin for 2 comple of years to 49 Woon ph hep cag ng 1 have not seen him sine: E never know much of this | ter street. that was the cW) no of her's b wow found that on the 16th of | wowan's houses than us Ivresen of prostitution and | ever in. 1 was x dutailed oficer, serving warrants ; . Duval cailed, personally, aud diew | resorts of thiever; they Were fe, kaoun Se ev peter, I think it was in the Gaull of 1802 that | heard Tom Jack Teer wets low houses, nome third or fourth 1 | son was dvowned; Mage Duval, av girl that oe 4 ‘et here took a recess for half an hour, and re- ‘hey tind the repatation of being resorte of hotet Schoharie, oad another girl they celled Iriel Moll, were thieves und xewt thieves; I knew Dan Wilson, called | present at tie time, | iwars! that .'acksom wae Mag Du- Jawes Tun, 40d, examined by Mr. Cut the Au- Deutoh Bon; 5 a little girl named Julia Wilson that | val’ man; T aid not iww bim a» der husband, or by itor of the Gy “ptroller’s dey it; 0% Y retar hod bearced with Mis. Duval; Dutch Dan was» hotel thief sight, ax being Jackson; | dit pot knows he was ber hus witness, rame 9, When of by Mr. Spires; this ix by | and shoplifter; I went owe to her house with Coptain tall, Ui) che told me of it | bower seen him there, 8. H. Stuart; it wet presested to the ‘a de Carpenter and officer Keefe to search for Al. Burtis, wh> the deseription gives of him, de must be the partment ano paid oer about the first of July; it was larceny; we di Mrs, j the descrigtion Dhave cot of him Bee boon since paid, 1 think, to Mr, Sy%res, Duval said he not been there: Ihave nat heard of | this trial: Han ‘arke, for one, Tave mes deseription of The order bears date «th April, 1854, and directs the h or Bartix ee ee hotel thibves; f heard of Fish | him; Peannot my, exactly, wtio ve describes ism tome payment to James Lothro, of the sum of $875, the - | being engaged in burt in Duene vb, 0 Mr. Brady—Aln marries hage been for the last Vex’s walary of Judge Stuart, due on the lst of ‘suly, 4880, Crosm examined by Mr. Culting—Mrw, Duval resided on | twhnryaia y ont hove rested wrth my faowy; bown Witnens~I paid the previous quarter's salary to James | the corner of Grand and Laurens street about years | property in the city, real and persoval, I never went te Lothrop, on or about the first of April The paper fone Heb iter lean grt iy ahe resided there: thiy | the howse except on bowiness: | vweet Oba a productd to witness) was left-at the Comptroller's ales | wan about the only time Lhsve ever been ln’ ber house; } Wok at them, and knew them te ber thi ‘00 by Harvey Hurt, ond paid about the fret of Octoner, | that wasin thowight; I think I raw Pill Moore’s woman, | them about the strowts still 6; (oud by Mr. Cushtug—being another order for the fre per! she was ibe ouly panes thiol {saw there: To Mr. Culting—1 baw neon thensgol mg oat and im aud quarter's ralary of Judge Stuart.) 1 had no business with Mra. 1 in Wooster street: [ | know them to be thieves: Loften vont there with war ‘The care for the proseeution here rested. CASE FOR THR DEVENCH. Mr, James 1. Brady stated that it wus not the iateation of the Counsel for the defence to make an opening to the nsliering the course of proceeding, the rendy occupied in the trial, and the im material collateral matters introduced by the prosecution, they ‘were not disposed to prolong the investiga ' nov did they deom it necessary to do no. But hqeulmitted to ihe Ce 86 matier of law, that the indictment against Judge rt has not boen in any view sustained by the evidence. He had mentioned to the Court at an iy, stage of these proceedings what the indictment wos in its frame; and he thought then, and thovgbé wtill, that xo fur from’ the indictinent being sus- tained a matter of law in its theory and frame, it is, on the contrary, entirely disproved #4 matter of lag. The low of 186 dees not, he eald, go no fur as to way that the mere understanding of an nceused that he could he approeched for the purpose of de thing in fteolf corsuyt, is of fixelf sufficient to convier him; and ax thin biibery statute is intended to reach persons in office, the sccured ix tried merely for an abuse of his offical ollice, and for an abuse from corrupt motives, This act of 1853 ‘was framed to meet, and only meeta, cases of official cor- ruption; but there can be no couvietion on an indict- mcnt for an act not committed, but only intended to be consummavéd and perfected. Counsel challenged the preduction of any statute which authorizes the couvic- tien of & man on an indictment for having perfected an act by proof of an intention to pi ‘the ment, he continued, wen that th ree! ‘a bribe to have a nolle prosequi enter case of a man bamtd Wm, Cosgrove. Now the prosecu tion have endeavored to prove, and have proved that there was no such man connected with the case, of the name of Wm. Cosgrove. But he would let tha! pass for the present, Mr. Brady then read the indictmont, He would not say that it is skillfully and artistically pre pared, for it is not. But i it meant avything, 1 was, that Juege Stuart received a bride of $500, on the condi tion that in his juatetat capacity, he would procure to be entercd, and did enter, a notle prosequi in tho case of 4 person indicted for an offence; and it was uecexsary on this indictment to prove that the act was consummated. It is proved conclusively, he that there nover was a nolle prosequi entered in the case of Mr, Cowgrove; thnt Indictuzent is still pouting; and the second Indictment inst Mr. Con oolly iy absolutely # nullity. If the evi cence of the principal witness could be searched and some little glimmer of truth found in it, still there would be nothing in it to show that a nolle prosequi wns ever entered by Judge Stuart in his Judicial capmelty. But he would submit. ant cad witnesses for 1) purpose of proving that this woran, Connolly, was not entitled to the slightest credit whatever. « Brady however, as- sumed that the Court would not—as it might do—here ipeharge the prosecution, om the ground that it cannot maloteined, Mr. Cutting insisted that Ifa Jucge of # court ef re- cord should sgree to receive, or should receive, a bribe from @ person, for the purpose of doing any! oor. rvupily, and should afterwards violate bls Pro: » he would still be Hable tobe indicted and convicted. ‘But suppore, enid he, that the law were «o absurd as to pro vide that no person should be convisted who did not ful- fil ida promise and give full consideration for the weibe received, then even #o he would insist in this case that the consideration for the bribe was given in this case. contended that there wax legally a nolle prospui enwertd, Judge Rovsevelt did not think it necosmary for counset to mabe an argument on that point, The offence, he id, is in the fance of the money, with the under- standing. Whether the subsequent proceeding was vulid or not, he did not deem it beceteary now to consider, Mr. Brady with Mr. Cutting ta the full th and breadth of his argument. But he did argue 1 where a statute makes it a State prison offence for Judge to receive a bulbe, and also makes it a State prison offence for a Judge to agree to recelve a bribe, the ac ewed who fs indicted for & bribe, cannot be convicted on evidemes of an {i a eens ee iac, YW P. peodue: Se ae ah? taken in the ind Jury room, r. Cutting denied that any minutes of Mrs. Connolly's evidence had been taken. Prady intormed Mr. Cutting that he (Mr, B.) fad eppiied for, and received a memorandum feom Me Vall of the evidence given by Mra. Connolly. Mr. ¢ sting explained that that peper was a inere meino- randum by Mr- Hall, redueing to writing his recollection of the evidence given by Mrs. Connolly in the Grand Jury 100m, and this, of course, could not he per e evidence in this case, Mr: Hall was in the vickaity of uw court, that if counsel wished to examine him ax to what évt "ence Mra. Connolly really did give, be would have an op: portunity of doing #0. Mr Brady (deliperately and resolutely)—There ia not one solitary particle of truth in the statemeot that Sr Ball, ly or indirestly, told me, or hinted to me. thet that memorandum was anything bat the regular minutes of evidence, taken by Mr. Hall in the Grand Jury room. And he (Mr. Brady) thought that where a Dis- trict Attorney privately and steaithily, in conjunction with another Judge, procured an indictment to be found » glocin snd in the dark, against a fellow officer, tt was not loo much to expect that he would laform counsel, for the scensed,of the steps taken by bin toetlect the object Wir. Hall said that he told him (Mr. Brady) that this minute was ¢ memorandum, written {rom tmomory, he (ity. Ba boring under ® very grows deinston Mr. Cutting argued, at al! events, that uiautes ot evi dence not read to or signed by the witness, could not be uscd for the purpose of convicting auch witness of p ry or false swearing. yen if tt bad been taken (ort the lips of the witness, it eould not be prov neve ix evidence, where it was not read to and subse by her Judge Roosevelt—It is quite obviows, oting as to facts, that there ix cu and Mr. Brady ing Votoce the Brady—If Mr. Hall says that this raemoray (token at the time the ey an) woman, 8 ne ¥ y is the laud, ond he woald ny to be perverted or attacked in Mr. Hall here came inte court, but Mr, Bendy in «4 that be would not examine him as « witne jet for the defen bu Me. Brady « t hed not been u teod that t snd \he witnesse of the officers, he Onrke examined by Mr. Br by Mr. Outting to-day . ein my sent and offered bim a pieoe of 1 Stuart about ten days ogo oe at fr night, | never apoke with hin before. Exemined by Mr. Cutting—I was sitting alongride of hit (Judge Stuart), and taking an interest in the prc ediogs, Tem the ‘same person im ha vig veen in company with Connelly in the New York Hot cope; ifyen want to know whether I have since been indicted, yon can search the records, (witness upon be ered )—! have since been lodicted fir a © ft waa cslled a burglary ry: 1 pleaded guilt y ventence om the Zid Lecember last t General 2enwions for the city and county of rk lo Mr. Prady—I have}veen part of the time sipee then in Judge Fdmond’s o + gl ry the time in Mr. Mulligen’s offee, and now 1 an in an agency George W. Novriy (examined by Mr. Beady)—Am cap tain of police of the Tenth ward; hare been captain ce November, ih; have been eomuectéd with the podce for nearly eleven years; have been connected with ‘he Chiet’s office some ‘pine ‘years of (hat time; knew fargaret Connolly since 1846 of 1846, knew her a Mar Murphy, the vext time | heard of ber she had as ed the name of Daval, | never heard of ber Wing enlled ony other name: | never knew her by the came of Ascensle or of Connolly. Mr. Brady—What is her general character ’ Mr. Cutting objected to the question. The question should be, what was her general character for truth and vernetty ? N—The iatest authority on the subject Reoveve! that the question is admiraibie very bad. @ Wenld you believe her under oath ' never was in ber house there, and heve no-personal kucwiedge of the ind of persons who went there, [ don’t }now that Jucge Stuart vinited there; I mmay have bean twice in her bourse in West Broxdway; Twas in the Chier’s office at the time; 1 nover made’ any compinint against her for keeping a disorderly house, 1 never know c ut made agsinet her at the police office for eying a disorderly house; 1 have very little personal nowledge of her; {have newer been in her house over three or tour timen in ten yeara; I lave ao personal Lnowleoge of who were her axsoclaten, Q. State the time when you heard her character for truth and veracity diseased? A, hove heard it talked of by Captain Carpenter, Joseph Keofe and Captain Leonard; nt the time we searched her house. about 180, we discussed the matter: it was a general impression, and the reports of thieves who resort there and report #0 outside; it iM princtrally because her house was the revort of thieves that I thought her characver, for truth and vernelty, to be bad; Mre. Duval was never, tomy knowledge, taken up as a thief, L have hoard the ober ny, from lawyer Spencer, that #he could be charged “with grand larceny; I never, before this triel, beard of her being charged | with theft; the present maine of Lizzy Cox \4 Mrs. Burtix; 1 have kxown her sixor seven years; I don't Mary atlall, and Mol! Hoges only by reputation ; I know w “model artist! in the city of the name of Mins Colew, she resides in Mott rivet [don't know whether she koepe & houve of naaig- pation, Q. 1 want to know wh ou yourself cohabited with Miles Coles, a “model Witnom—I would be very flat to teli you or anybody else whetner I did or not Haye been a james Leonard examined by Mr tain of police about seven year been ten or even years connected with the police; was in the Chief's office three or four years; baw no personal know ledge of Mrs. Connolly; kuew her houre at the corner of Grond and Laurens streets; 1 hea of going there in vearch of persons; I know the gen tot ebaracter of Mra. Connolly by report: aa to the house the kept, itwas bad, {t was the resort of men and wo men of bad practices—thieves; had never been in her hone; nowledge I gained of her and her | derived from conversation; 1k sharacters you spoke of; a a for stealing, I have arr jreen once and Gorge Fish once; Fish w Hlladelphia and dikcbarged shortly sfterwaris ; prevent reputation cf him and Buriis 14 the ame, tough Ur. Burtis has been in business here ax a livery etable keeper, und the keeper of « public house; Rgerton, T be Neve, liver in Providence, KL; the reputation of Hilly Moore fe the same, thief; the reputation of Tom Jack #on is the same. Crosm-examined by Mr, Cutting—I saw Burtie ia Broad. way within avery few days; | think slnce the trial came on; i eral reputation of the howe Mra. Coonoll ad; that ix wil Lapoke about; | not mean to spook of her general charwcter for truth and veracity; 1 Lever heard that called in quesiiin tll the prevent tral, Decaute I knew pot); er Jomes A. P. opking, examined by Mr captain of police; have been so bout tour years and a half, have not been connected with the Chief's office have known this woman about five years and a half; her Bealy—Am geveral character is reported as bed, if +he was personally loterested 1 do not think that { would helieve Ler under oath; { saw Joluny Taw king or Williams once; | arrested him ona charge of having stolen property from an Eastern boat his escape in her house, and arrest she got between him amd me on the front basement and locked the door open, bat belore 1 got in he had got out of the window; 1 know Captain Green, Fish avd Burti«; her house hal the reputation of being the resurt of hotel thieves; | know Tam es Fpleton; hie bs reported to be in Be and to be a ponel thlet; Billy Musee tealso unierstood to be » panel thief, Crommexamined by Mr. Cutting—1 did not know Mra. Duval at the the she kept house in West Hroadway, or io Chureh street: the time } wont into ber lmase was in Wooster street: I de not reeolicct that | way ever in her honae at t er of Grand ard Lawrence sbreete; 1} went twle p that in Wooster «treet it wes on have uo reeolieetion of ever bein, other thaw all my personal derived fromm that visit: 1 en-not tal you how I felt when Haw way trom me; | cannot ray that I wae tert yu't think ‘it was bungling on my part. for aiding him t 1 think she wee indict wat 1 think = ab not Teapnot tell you why abe was not tried; this see was about three years ago; 1 do not know th made inquiries abe fterwards; if l wer « very Mkely that that mortific recollest whom I sived complaint befcre; 1 do not think tt waa be Stuait, the house was not im my district of Ler Louse begng complained int that [ ever heard against h I do not know what her elv } veracity Is among those with w 1 lave heard it #poken of good de among the police, merchants. re Judge | never heard « roceatly mechanics aad others, | think phe denied the offence with whieh | charged hur she talked a good deal,‘objected to be arrested, and I bave oo doubt that ehe asserted her innocence, {mean to way arenort of thieves aart about houses amd l Mr. i ork. ay~ tne knew repute ined by polter ner this woman by the name Kon of keeping bad plows ven, and thele frle meny of the r char # reputed thieves, I ated her house, but her naiwe I think 1 wax ere with au no her heue in Wew tray i Meer, + Chore brought of aa Lothrop tunit gave m nd recond ralary an order on the ¢ a whieh I got! 1 aenignment bh inded to witnos t givem, and f got Ue that aud pald kim part of the bw emething about 6100. which ! hed } 4 it te him of my own wo Cromexamined by Mr. Cuttlog—The » Jucge for that ‘seme these in Vebruary, 1865, pro- ly sy the 10th my note ogninet foige Stuart 9 8210; it wee past due for a few days | spplied wo him for payment; he raid it was net convenient for him at that time to pay me, or that he had not the money: then | ogsewted that euch an orfer would yretmbly be nied at ibe Mecbaniee’ bank, where {had got imi lar orders dlaewunted, fur mysell: | apulied, but OM not tit done, and Mr Spires dicounted it for me | think retelned cone where about HOG In my kwnds for tw) or three weeks [got an order for the sect quarter . lary on the 4th of April; my lnpresdton ix thet 1 Judge called we in the Other foonnfand asked me KT thorght | coul4 get bie salary from the mane perem that 1 got the Gret from? | sett | hed mo doubt | ovabd 1 re ceived the money etl paid Wt over Us bien J dit Chat oe & friend of Jucge Stuarts’, to oblige him Jodge Mtuart Dullcing a bouee wt thle time ced | ead’ ng en yar me mber, 6 that it x barely pomeithe he may have cme bing out of That To Mr. Braty—The tiene | received the Bret mw we ln Febroary, end i part of it three or four a. To Mr Covting—! pert Bnew that s! that time there the bande of the Seerill aquinet Judge wart. ‘Widiam B Duly, examined by Mr Brad garet Dont, at ek hy the” paso of seen Tom Jackwm che told me he was drowned was then an offeer attached to the Heennd Dhatriet ‘n mowrniog and Wold me about ber teva ot dochoom, bow had gre to sme and was = bind at prevent, I reste Sy ned Lexington avense, I bave { suited the poles, | oan do better I live ofl my means si tetwely. Chave cocastom te employ my atts esaeaton ally on bey lng ood selling Whatever Iran make « dofler 4 [hove been apeoulating im protmety, bat | do wat te tore rants against girls in the invoe for aoe oflt and battery jE went there afler thieves, without warmnts; | omanot sey that I found thoxe | was in search Tourence Austin exarnined by Mr. Brodya-Am a poltes officer, and have heen rinse Idd : Thave: lnawn thin wo- ines 286, by the came of Morgane Duval, have heard har ex ag and Margaret, and on the door plate there was Mrs. Duval: Iwas sergeant of tint diatriet lor some time; the girls used to get in front: ot the deor and stand thers, aud wo would have to drive them away, the character of the Louse was that fl wees house of bad repate: that is all I knew about i talid not know any of thene thieves To Mr, Catting-—Her houre was within my bent'fin éwe years, my beat wae bounded from ome gide of Soring to ‘one side of Oxnad, and from Broadway to the rivert It wae yp attend to there houres, nter examined by Mr. Mmdy—Have teen a f police nearly ei ht years 2 heve knows this an since Teame into fopartmont a Mag Demet; wT first beeame acquaiated with her, she kepp a bowe at 21) Chureh street; ehe moved trom there n after T came iv as captain, | knew her whem kept hovse at the corner of Grant and Lawreme streets; my hnprowsion ie that her house was the rovort Of thieves of the worm kind; I had lowt aight <a within the pastt olw navel, Jack Ohi ‘on New trond, Jim Fay ¥ 1 ee tis and Billy Moore od [de not know |New York om Priday mined by Mr, Cutting wuw bin Crone «: val when she kept s house in Church street in 1848, knew her to be there lows than wix months; 1 think | A fret knew Mra. fe in that howe twice it wee within my beat, 1 dow't know where she moved to [ there. I did not knew of her up to the time abe went to the corner of Grand and Laurens wt t, Lwas once i that house that way net within ny beat, Ido mot know where there; I heard che next kept » house never bad to go the e @ Who wi the charnetor of the persons of» house best er within whose beat {1 is, or the officer with neal ii is wot? A. The officer withia whose b s should know best, A Jurcr—Some of Ohese perrons whom 1 identiiied as uted thiever beve been orrasied and committed for theft Al. Bartle was, Jack Cherry was, Moll Hodges is now in prison at Blackwell's Inand; Lydia Von Tans has been arrested; Jock Vam Jaseel was convicted £ cannot answer porltively ny Cos of Anne Yams Nortrand invicted | | newer saw these persons at her (Mrs, Duval’s) house, Capt. Green, I heard, was arrested , Losmnot auawer for George Fish. re called for the defence, amd en. Mr Hrady, therefore, ab pied to have the case adjourne® pplication was granied, and the case accordlaghy stands adjourned Hil Taewiay morning, at 10 'clook Pollee Intelligence. HRAVY VINANCIERING OFEKATION—A 6TOCK SRORIR IN TROUDLE—SEVEN THOUSAND DOLLARS UM VOLYED. Yesterday morning officer Mactio, of the Third Datetet ted a stock broker named Willian A. charged with obtaining money to tbe amount of orn Thowus H. Wood, dry goods merchant, of BAT Fulton street, Brooklyn, by false pretences aad treed ulent representations. The aceused, who keeps an office 1N Hanover wivest, aud revides at 101 Homey street, succeeded, it ix » ob'sining the abewe amount of money fre Yetween the month of March, 18 1854. In a lengthy affidavit made before Justice Hreenan, the complelnast allegew that the acoused, inorder to obtain thee loaws, reprevented that worth shout $300,000 ant that his wife bad a fortune of at least 8100, that he was a cousin of the Key, Henry Ward Heesher, the eminent preacher. aud was, altogether, ome of the mort respocmble parties in § ; that believing th ty be trae, the com: y ook ta security few { sock in the Warwick Walon pl the Comy ted nomewhere in Vermont), 125 sharee in the ona! OD Company, 60 do. of the Ameriona Candle (npany, 560 In the Keystone Mining Company, 1,066 do in the Pale Grove Gold and Copper Mining Com 1.000 40. ip the Lake & ne Sliver Company, 200 mypany of Me 1,000 in the Vor. ¢ inion ¢ mont Copper Com: Samuel Fowler Mort J wid.) The wbove stock was by Keecher to be by the * gr one, and theteiore these for the purpte of Sefrsading him vut of ble property Me further nileges thet the scoured Is mot worth $500,000. a» tated by him previews to the borrow ing pers The whe denied the charge preferred sgainet him fn a most streewres manner, was held to ballin the sum of 610,000 by Jus Hee Brennan to « of No. (0 Jebn at tat or the charge in Cle city © som, whereup Mr Dmpiel Rargene, ne the seouaed’s ated w great d tock b termes, ool « concen. bbe pro 1 the charge pre ol bin oom (qulte w and mu Mbay, « Wookbinder by trad yee | Knew this woes Wp tar Grae 1th ward poles with intent rot Jammer T Denber complainant at be celles tn Vandewater eteset, ond that ¢ parsing through Frankfort strmt, ate ate bowr on Honday night he wae attached: Wy the prisoner, who exdanvored t rob complainagt of hie wate ve Drumbar's cries for help, wens ( prix ner in the meet scien! Ge immner, prostirated him fo the ground A roe cat amide da tots Hose tween the two colored mem end Bhay, w w! the latter eventually came out tecond best. The roe Of the ceourrenee witracting the tm of sm officer, hay wae with aan trouble ae care! aed lodged tn the eAgtion house (9 he /emnader om charge « F of the wight. ¥ Jertion Welch compet tod the neruned Wo the Tombs on charge of sitempt of cobbery CHARGE OF ODARD LARCENY Anes Dalton was arrevted by Weer Henchel, of the Fight ward police charge! with menling « lve? cloak, vehurd ot 040, frou the bust of Abel Whestes, No, lay Weamtar rtreet. artiele of eAhing fount teaich shout her parson by the tiers Justi Dngtowm before whem the wes conveyed ommsed Oo for trial, in defen it A CAO tat THR PATENT #470 GAME Onin, A Foutherner wax tenced wut of 900) yerterday by ten pharpers, whe indoor d (he etranger Wo seeumpany Nagmn ne tar an Vorty Chir) treet “oear the Oryate! Pelaes, and bere, efth the okt of the patent ale the Southerner orem viet, 1 mer F saghe wr ewer Bie © pate ot to got ae tmardet he merney tact brut they cot we omelly. 0x they retreated ee