The New York Herald Newspaper, November 17, 1855, Page 1

THE NEW YORK HERALD. WHOLE NO. 7020. a MORNING EDITION—SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 117, 1855, OFFICIAL CORRUPTION. ‘Whe People vs, Sydney H. Stuart, City Judge. COURT OF OXBR AND TERMINBE. Before Judge Roosevelt. YIFTH DAY'S PROCEEDINGS, Fuuwax, Nov. 16,—Protracted aa the trial of this cage (has become, it has rather increased than diminished in ‘interest. The court room yesterday was, as usual, closely pecked—the portion allotted to the members of the bar being crowded justas much a3 the outside auditorium. A number of old and eminent lawyers dropped in throughout the dey, and listeved with evident gusto to ‘the cross-examivation of a luly who has ‘oceupied such position in the community as bas the principal witness. Margaret M. Connolly recaiied to the staad, and her di- Mr. . We lett of yesterday where ack to Philadelphia. “Now, din yon Marwordiccoms on to the city of New York, and if so, when? A. We lefc there the last of April, and forwarded our furniture to Boston, and came.on here to New Yok ourselves; [mean my husband and eldest sister. @ in New York did you see Judge Stuart A, In May, at his office in Chambers street, next to Bur- theatre; they were repairing the room at the time going to court, and that 1 must go to him that afterneon about 4 o’ckock, ‘w his office; I went there in the afternoon; | saw him in His amall room, out of the office. Q. Mate now to the jury what occurred at that inter- view! A. He told me that we would hyve to wait awhile the matter; that Smith (meaning the Recorder) gene- rally weut to the county , and we bape anh Bie for an opportanity when ‘he war aut of town to have m! husband's ‘trial come on; ke ssid Mr. Smith , ‘went to the country in warm weather; he did not state what month. Q. State what else occurred at that interview? A. He staked me if could not come intv cuurt at the ofJune; I told him my intentions were to leave Q. Did you state to him whore you were gcing?. stated that I was goiog in the couatry. Q. What answer did you make him when he asked you to come into town in June? A. I told him if! thought an} could be done in the matter I wonld. . What did he say to thaty A. He told me he did not know as he could at that time; that it was better to leave ‘the matter rest as long a4 it could, und that he would in- form me of the first opportunity that offered. a Hi Re ue, else occur between you on that occa- slop? A. No. Q. Where did you then go’ A. I then went to Lispe- vard street, where 1 was stopping, and from thence I went to Boston. r inning ie city. ‘at ou next come to the city? A. Not till uly. . did you ext seo Judge Stuart? A. I came he 18th, and I saw him on Thursday at bere street. Q. State to the jury what occurred on that occasion? A. He toid me he had peut « mensage to my sister to tele. or write to me to come to the city immediately; hat Mr. Smith was going to leave town, nud that Ne thought he would be goue two months, and that now “would be an opportunity to have this come to trial in his absence, as Mr, Smith Bad asked him to attend to all the business, if be thought thst his health would permit him to; and if not, that Mr. Smith had given him his address and that he was to telegraph or write to“fim, and that he wanted to have the case of my husband trie{ the first ‘week of the term, if possible; he suid that Mr. Smith not left town yet, but expected to on the following ; he alao atatod that he sent for me as soon as he t information that Mr. Smith was to leave town, #0 it I around and see it] could find out any- of these witnesses against my husband. ‘Mr. Stoughton denounced as miserable and disgustin; this attempt to show that the Recorder could havo tried ‘Connolly—a man whose counsel he had eon on this very indictment—or that avy bat Stuart could have tried him. led Mr. Cutting waited for the “spism”—as he called it to pass, and the witac. continued—exoaption, however, Yeing ‘ken, He then toll me again that Monnot was livir’ o! Point Gloucester, ani that ho was dolng bual- ‘ity; that be did not know where his place of was, but thought would be most likely to find wething about hou at the New York Hotel; T then man to make inquiries for him at the New York Q. Tid you relate to Sudge Sinart what passed between ourself and others at the New York Hotel? A. I made quiries for the wituesse-; after I rade these inquiries, I again «aw. Judge Stuart, and told him what I had learned about them. Q. State what you told Judge Stuart you had learned. A.T told him that I had been iaformed that Moanot e into tcwn every morning at 8 o'clock, and loft at 4 o'clock, and that he left his horses and carriage at tho New York Hotel stable; he then told me to go up to his house in the afternoon, and that he would bring tho afli 4avite against my husband to his house; he said for mo to be there between 6 and 6 o’clock; I went there that arternoon, . State to the jury what pawed then? A. T was -waiting for him when ‘ie came ia; he then said he had brought the papers to show me what evidence there -*was; he sat down on the sofn, and I took a seat by the side’of him on the sofa; he commenced reading the affi- davita, @. Took at these affidavits (showing them to witness) of John B, Monnot, and George N. Woitman, and Alex- ander Johngon, and John W. Tiusdale, and toll mo whether thebe are the afli‘aviis be then had and read to yout Witness (after examiaicg them)—I think they are ‘the same ones. Mr, Cutting notified the Court that these were the same affidavits which Mr. Vanderbilt swore Judge Stuart had taken off the file and brought away, Q. State what next pas: A. He said that Monnot's evidence nothing iu the case—that it would not be injurious at all; he asked me if 1 knew where this Joha- son was; [ told‘him I did not; he asked me if [ bad made inqoiries, or if I could not make inquiries; I told him “the last Thad heard of Mr. Johnson he had gone to Bu- rope; he then told me that George N. Whitman was in cal and had been there elected an alderman, or to some public office; I told him then that Michael Kecr was not out of the city, and thit Vairick Garvin was also in California; Patrick Garvin was » witness in the case <f my husband, inst him; then he said that J must ananage to see this Kerr in some way, or he would send Eider; I then left that night, and saw him again next mol , at his office. Q. t passed next morning? A. He spoke of Scott and Ninsdale, the officers who had arrested my husband; ‘he told me the ward that Mr. Tinsdale wns in; 1 do not re- collect it now; he told me he would send for these officers and have a conversation with them, and see what they knew or recollected of the case, und what their testimo- ny would be against my husband, I then told him that amy husband said that Mr. Scott and Tinsdale were both very fine men; Mr. Elder was to nS the Gramercy House and see if he could find this Me. Kerr; I left, ant was to see him again the next day. Q. Did yout A. Yes. Cou: te to the Jury what occurred. 7 objected to and exception taken. Witness—The next morning I «nw Judge Stuart and of- ficer Elder; Mr. Elder «aid he had been to the (iramercy House; Stuart was present at the time, and aske! him the question; he said he weut there with the intention of specking toa Mr. Wright, who is interested in the hotel; net «peak to him (meaning Kerr) on the subject, said he had come to the conclusion that it would do; that he would be criminating himself; Mr. Stuart me then to get an interview with this Kerr, if [ |, aa it would not be injarions to me; it could not be y against me. Bray demanded to know what this testimony hat Judge Stuart, that he re- uring airy of a nolle prosequi, Evidence declare admissible ani exception taken. Wilrees—I then got an acquaiatance of mine to go to the New York Si and make jaqairies aboat Kerr from his sister; how to get an int not know, (witness corree! herself) I got an acquatat- ance to go to the Gramercy Hotel to see M. Kerr. Q After you had cawied inyuiries to be made about ‘him did you again see J Stuart? A. Yos, sir. Q. State what you told Judge Stuart you had done? A. J told him it was an impossibility to get an interview With this Kerr; that I had tried every way and that I could not ft; he told mo not to be discouraged or disheartened but go myself personally; 1 did go myselt; 1 Leonard stroet fio a New ‘an introduction at ttle Teleh a named Ellen; took me to the York Hotel Michael sgezer rEtere i 35 3 A Es Tcould get Kerr to go away , when the trial was to take . — objected to the introduction of evidence a went had a An Judge @taart’s com, ity in matter of the new indictmen: agatast Connolly. Se a a the evidence, and exception wee Witnews—I told Stuart 1 had made a proposition to give Kerr $50 to keop away that term of court; he told tue | mart continue my calls on Kerr and his «ister both y;” there was nothing elses to the jary when you again saw Judge Stuart? EST hy te ea , Isaw him almost every day, with © twioe, in the morn- sick in Angust I afternoon bifore he Feces $2 i et og i | egat eee s at} 2. came to the city? or 8th of August, y husband and have bin se 8 g = <a 4 = 2 xb i 2 g =. = i : F Atti he FESS zit e315. qi i 3 street. A. T saw him i i 28 Hi i view with this Kerr I did | come here the first of #eptemixr; that there was to be a double term of the court that mvath, and that Mr. Smith would not be in the court whi re he was, arf that he could do a well as he couli, if Mr. Smith was out of town, meaning that-he was not ir evurt with him. Q. Did you come back in har? A. Yes, sie. ). Did you then see Ji jaart? A. Yes, sir, Q. State to the jury wi occured? A. He told then that it was almost the sam was in the ramo court with bim; that the rooms were together, and that he me; but that if 1 came October, the matter should 5 thas is, hat my busband should be trivd; in the month of Avguat—t forgot that-—Mr. Stuart told me to a the: iriet Attorney’s office; he tolt? me thst Mr. HhWs private office was on the corner of Park place and way, over the Broadway Bank; he « spoken to Mr. Hall about the case of my that Mr. Hall had told him that he wns ready to try Mr. Connoily, or Co. ove, or whatever hi» name was, whea the Fhiladelpbia Mr. Jobnzon—had returned; he (Judg. uart) said he oi? not know what to make of it, unless it was Mr. Johnson had re turned; he told me to be sure and go-inere about half part 9in the morningr thet Mr. Hall always went to his rivate office before coming into court; J went there the lowing morning; I saw him, and had » conversation with him. Q. When did you sce Judge Stuart after that? A. I went directly from Mr. Hall's office to Mr, Stuart's; Stuart was waiting for me to come from there; he asked me if I had een Mr. Hal; T told him thot I had; he asked me what he said; {told him that be said be was willing and ready to try the caro of my huadund at av; time, ard that he would convict hit if ke coult, a that’ he believed he had evidence to do it; that Mr. Jobnson, the Philadelphia gentleman; as he called him, had returned, and if {t was not an utter impowmbility to convict him Le would do so. Q. State what else passed between you on that occa- Mon? A. Mr. Stuart was in » hurry to go into court, vad Ewent away;, 1'was to se9 bln that aiferaoon again at Lis office; I aid eo him that afternoon; | told him there must be #01 dene in the case, that we could not stand it any longer, and that my husband was deter- mined to come to the city—that this had been » thing of long standing, amd that what means we had were all gone—that I had to pledge my jewelry and sell some part of it, and that we were poor and could not live #0 no longer, and that I had made use of some of my beothor’s money to live on; he then told me to. come back t> his office again that afternoon; T went, and he gave me five pieces; 1 was sitting in bis office, and he naked me to wait about five minutes; he went down the stair and he came back and gave me this money, and sald thai he had borrowed it from Mr, Phillips; 1 objectod in taking it; 1 told him I ¢id not like to tuke it; that he has been very kind to me, and that I was afraid something was wrong when he wanted to return me. the movey; he speke to me this way—aays he, ‘My God, Margaret, jon don’t doubt me;” Tsaid, no, T placed all confidence in him: 60 1 aecepted of the $100; he told me then I should have every dollar of what I'had paid him back, and that he would give me $100 every month till it was paid; there was nothing more on that occasion in the month of August. Q. When did you see Judge Stuart again? A. Jn Sep- tember; I called upon him two or three different timea, sag had convercations with him about Tinsdale aad others. Q. Did he give you after this any more money? A. He gave me a $100 now in September, Q. What did he sey on that occasion? A. He told me he could not do much for me that month; that they were to Lave double sessions, but to be sure to come at the first ot tne next month and that the matter would be brought to a close, be it good, bad or mdifforent, but that he would not have Mr. Connolly come into court and be conyie'ed for the world. @. Did you see him after that! A. Yes, I stayed in town thrée or four days, and then left again for Boston. Q. When did you come to this city again? A. I eame, cn ‘the 24 of Getober, in company with Mr. and Mra rurtins @. Did. you, after your arrival, have a meetiog with the District Attorney, and If so, where! A. I went first to Mr, Stuarts office; Twas twice there that day, in the morning, and afternoon about balépast 2o’choek; I did co the Judge; I went direct from there to Harrison , and from that I went to calbon aa scquaintance of mine; Mr. Burtis came for me and I went with him to Reoorder Smith’s office, fa Chacaberd street. Q. Who was present therey A, Mr, Burtis, Mr. Hall, Mr. Smith and royrelf. Q. And there a conversation ensued between you and them? A. Yes, sir. Ge Bid ou aerwards go betore the Grand Jury? A. - : , air. Cors-examined by Mr. Brady~Q. Your recollection of dates is ratuer remarkablet A. It is when 1 transect business oa thove dates. . Have you mace memoranda of those dates’ A. No, sir, I never made ® memoranda of the dotes of thore transactions; | bave esteted them entirely from my me- mory, without any ald ur assistance from papers, oF from conversations with other persons—entirely trom my own memory; Thaye readl the reports. in the payers; Ut read parts of the reports of the trial; read Lider’s t mony; I did not read the first day’s report at all not reed Mr. Cutting’s speeeb—no part of it; I think I bud seen him before he made that apeech; Thad not the least curiosity d that speech; J did read testimony besides that cf E read Mr. Smith’s; I believe that inal; 1 dic ny winter's; T did not have the time this morn lait evening’ paper, but did not see her testimony in it; it was the second edition of the Bening Express; 1 do not know that her evidenco was in it. Q. Did anybody ever write down hing that you ever told that person about these transactions?” A. Not that I know of, except it might have been before the Grand Jury; Mr. Hall was inthe Grand Jury room; he did not exemine me; Ido not know that ke wrote down apy evidence; he handed ine those papers, (the eertil- cates,) and asked me how he came in possession of them, and I told him; if Hal} did write down anything [ never saw it; my sister and I bave talked about the matter since he trial came on; not before; I had asked her be- fore if rhe remembered Judge Stuart; that is all that pasred between me and ber about it; Lam certain I never raid aword to her about Stuart with the exception of that; I saw her occasionally since September last. Q. When you came to the city with Mr. and Mre. Bur Lis, id you see your sister? A. Yes; I went to. see her that day; cid not stop in the city that night; I did not teil ber anything about what was going on; I did not seo her after I had had the interview with the Recorder and Mr. Hall; feaw her next week; Thave no recollection of speaking’ to her about what passed between me aud the Recorder, and Mr. Hall and Mr. Purtis; J recollect my telling her rhe would have to gut ready to go befvre the Gran Jury; she asked for whet purpose; [ eaid, “it ix not for me to tell you that—you will know it ali when you go there;’? singe this transaction with the Recorder uné Mr. Hall, I baye spoke to her about it; my maiden name was Margaret M. Murphy; I kept that mame till 1848—at least, that was my right name, Q. When did you first go by any other namo? A. I think in 1887 I went by the name of Duval. Q. How old are you? A. I am thirty-six years I was born in 1819; I was thirty-rix Inst August. Q. And in the year 1837 you took the nare of Duval? A. Yes: my father died in 1835; I came to New York two yenes after that, and went by the name of Duval. oi Were dd’ you go to live when you caine to New york ¥ Witnens---Mast I answer that question Mr. Cuttirg stated that a witness is not bound to an- aver any question whatever which directly tends to de ade or throw obloqay on her, or indirectly teads to criminate her. That was bis view of the lw Mr. Brady spoke to the question. ‘The rule stated by Mr. Cutting was undoubtedly true as a general rule, but there was this very important distinction that the rule dives not spply if the question is relevant to any import ant fesue in the case. He reterred to Greenleal, 460. Judge Roosevelt was aware of the difficulty in'this ¢ still he thought the witness's testimony might be di of without conflirting with the rule. The witne: raid, is not bound to give any testimony against her which ins eriminal prosecution could be used for the pur. pore of convietis er, or which would even direetly tend io degrade her; Uut still it may be that such ques- tions may be put to the witness which may not go to the récixe issue involved, but to some materivl collateral sue; and there the witnows t+ obliged to testify. It ts within the right of the defeuce here to show such clr- cumstances as may go to qualify the intknacy existi Between the witness and accused, or to affeat bi eredi- pility. Mz. Cuttin preferred that where there was a doubt as to the rat 1 constraction of the rule the witness should be compelled to answer. Judge Roosevelt advined the witress that, as to any matter which may be prejudicial to her. reputation, it was one of those things whizh cannot be avoided in this case. Mr. Brady—Where did you go to live when you came to this elty? Witness—I do not ke to answer that question. Judge Roosevelt—¥ ou cannot very avoid it Mra. Connolly, This te « case of that character that this can not well be avoided, Question repested. Witness—Weil, I could not state where 1 went, for i have forgotten it) it has slipped my “memory; that is not Intended ae a joke; it iva trath; it pa ny Ge o Ihave forgotten it.I should have felt « rg Jelling it if] had known. UB Ft hae Fd ‘the name of Daval? A. I did go by the name of Duval. q. Where did you get that name? A. I gave it to myself. Q, Butit was not your namein fact? A. No, sir. aha ‘were never married to anybody of that name . No, rir. A. You never married anybody till you married the man Ascensiot A. No, rir. Q. Madame, do you recollect what you swore to in the Grand Jury room?” A. I believe I do. Q Did you tell the Grand Jury that yeur first married name was Duval? A. No, sir, 1 did not, % told them { went by that name. @. And you did not say anything of that kind? A. ‘They asked me why { went by the name of Duval; I said I had gone by that name; they asked me if | was married; 1 said Thad been; they did not ask me my husband’ name, and I did not tell them. @. bia you testify to this-—“Tam wife of Wm. B. Connolly, who is also known as Wm. Cosgrove; I married him about the time he was Indicted ve been twice married?’ A. I stated that. Mr. anne A ame was Witness —T t name. Q. Can you fix with the same accuracy a# you have done other things;lyonr marriage with Ascensio” A. it was in the «pring of 1848, in the month of April, my xis- ter then boa at 220 Hudson street; 1 general rile to see her every day or two; li rhe came to New York, sad i put ber of age; (continuing to read)—' My first married ret M: Daval.’” not state that; I said did business by trade sud yald her expenses ani clothed lapeed without my seoing’ her, talons w my rr, city; 1d0 not zeeullect ever telling asked me where I lived, and if she me, and | told ber tt was come ; } learned taal I never worked at wy trace here, Q Waere did this mverringy take 4. ‘At 47 Lonard vow; my wister made ees, and rhe was a¢ timp weddi @. Who eit a knew where Ni: i z i Q bid you hnow of ‘Re marriage to | know secording to the rites cf what eburch you were marwd? 2. It was somet 1 was unacquainted with to grt man ied, and | knew ni ‘abont it. Q. Wao this Mr. Kellog s yousgror an sged'man? a. T could aot muy; I could Ao pes whether be bad red or whire ov black bair. or whether he stood up ereet or aot; Lwould'not know him if I had seem him the next dh: silor the wedding; T saw him win tbe came in, bat Loké nee ee aa oars en you cannot give one arydescription of him— nbout bima trom top to toet A. Pe ait ono abont him; he was dressed in etieonts dress; tnero-wan nothing peauller about bia dress; 1<o mot know whether he made a mem in any book; he gave ao 2 cer- tiftcate of marriage, but I rever cexd Hh; the secoad atter the took place my bustend beat a4 I threw the: te in the fire. Q. how eee you knewn Asoonsio? A. Abouta your and w helt; he caine to my hose and used to tulle me, Q. Were you ani he as intimate se man and wife to- getbor? 4. No, sir, never; I lived im West Broadway || wre first knew him, and in Churely street when I map- |] ried him, Q. Was be jealous of you when bo boat yout A. Nos. he 4 EY with me for speaking to.s female; he was u- clic, he said he was an officer in the army; he spoke Spanish and a little +h; [ was told he was dead by a tard of the name of Borevia, 1 sxw him (Borevia) in ie year 1862, im Woomer street, at my house; J do not knew where he can be found now; it is every hard mat- ter to Keep track of Spaniards; the inarciage with Con- nolly wus in Philadelphia. } Dir. (hendicg witness the marr! certificate) — You say this paper hina never been altered since it cane inve your possession? A. Yes, sir; timt alteration was monde fn it when I got it; I saw Mr. Montgomery writs it 1 am sure of the date; it was on the 29th of April, and on Friday—a very remarkable day too. a Loge a moa ek or fog ed a remarkable | ley for marrying; jeve it is for ; Wwinene— Ai the wiiting on that og made by Mr. Mentgomery; be wrote it on the table in the middle or ibe room; J did not see any inkstand, for 1 did not look for it. @, You say Connolly propored to you to marry bin; that you did not care inuch about it, but that you’ afver- wards convented to marry him. WI you not care mueb sbout it? A. It was not that | dh not care enongh for the men, but I thought of the dimieulties ta which he was, and wheu I saw him dejected et my not cariog to marry bim | thought #: any rete 1 would marry him, no matter what the consequences might be. Q. Had sot you and Connolly Hred as man and wife before thaty A. 1 do not like to answer that question. a utee Roosevelt (to witness)—You had better answer Witness We bad, sir. 4 An attarnc for 1863 was hero brought into court to test the xecuracy of the certisicate, the date of which van sup med to be altered, by substituting April for May. ‘the day of the week is given aa Priday, and it ap- peste ‘hut the 29th of April’ fi) on & Friday, and ¢ oth «f Moy on a Sunday. Q. Do you know a man named Tom Jackson? Witness —I decline answering that question, sie, Mr. Brady— Why do you deoline? Witner+—1 decline an» waring that prsetion, Mr. Brady —Did yoa ever dive with him as bis wifer Witnere—I decline anawortog that question. Q. What was his burinase? A, Ido not know what it was. Q, Had be any busines? A, [de not know, Q. Did you know be was a thief? A. I did not, efe Q. Lid"you ever lawar he wast A. [never recollect of anybody telling m@any such thing Q. And you ncvec Beard it in any way? A. Not to my recolleg ioe Q. Lid you know that be and Fish were ever arrested for stealing? A. J mever kenew it to be so, Q. Lid you ever bear that Tom Jackson was arrested for sesliig? A. Lam not to anewer what 1 heard bus what 1 know. in you know Fish? 2. u ever hear that Fish and Jackson, or either of toem, were in a State prison? A. T never cid. Q What was Burtis’ occupation’ — A. 1 knew him to keep » livery stable anda porter house; I never w. persernlly acquainted with the fact of his being ac- rested for stealing. Q. Pid you ever viet Fish or Tom Jackson at Burtis’, or wih elther of them when be in prison? A. Well 1 cecline answering that question whether I did or did not. Q. You knew that James M. Suith was their counsel ? A. Linew he was J “x counsel; Jackson lived here in the city; be was not married. Q. Did be tive with any womant Witness—{ decline Roe werirg that question, Q. Lid you know that Mr. Smith was Burtis’ co A. [never was known to that fact; 1 might hav it, but ido not recollect’ it; I heard Fisher's wife say that ¢mith wee counsel for bich in a civil suit, but any thing further I do not know @. Did you hear in 1845 that Fish was charged with robbing # man in Tammany fall’ Witness—This is the first Lever heard of it Q. Did you ever hear that he was charged with rob- hery at Delmenico’s Hotel’ Witoess—1 might have beard tuch a thing, but } don’t recollect it; my cuciosity never leads me to make inquiries about other people's alfaics; am a little ceaf in ove ear, and have been for years. Q Lid you bear that Fish was also concerned in the robbery of rome hotel in Brondway, and that $4,000 was traced to bir possesion’ A. I never did. Q. bid you know that he was at Aspinwall ? don’t know that be was, er but what he was. Q. Do you recollect bis be'ng brought back fcom that urder arrest? A. 1 do not. Q Vo you recotect that Fish and Jackson were ar- rested at Ballston’ A. 1 heard they were arrested at that time; {de not know whether it was for a criminal offence; Lsaw Jackson there in privon; I went there for the purpose of seeing him; I employed a lawyer; when I returned Mr. Jackwon gave me a le ter to carry to Mr. Fmith, which | done «>; what was inthe note T do not know; Mr. Smith eale Twas to give him $200, and I did; J do net know whether be attended to the cae; the money Was not mine; it was Jackson's; he gave me £50 the fret day | went to Woos er atreet to top for him; I never heard that Burtis stole « pia. Q. I want you to state whether at the tine you knew ond oxsocistec with Jackson. Fish and Burts you did not understand they were cnch of them a thiet? ‘A. Ido not recollect that snybody ever wid me they were cach o thief, Q. You wore asked about the first time you saw Mr Stuart, and you there waa rome girl (hat was arrest ¢d in 47 Leovard street. What kind of a house was that? Witnesr—I decline answering that question. 1} do nut krow whether it was @ brick house or a frame house, 1 suppose that wax what you meant when you acked what hind cf « house it was, Q. Wes ita house of prostitution? ewering that question, Q. How old was the girl whom you wanted to get 1 leased’ A. I don’t know her age and never did; she lived with me in my house. Q. Was that a boording house? A. Yes, air. Q. how many bourders had you’ A. I caunot say ; | don’t reco! Q. Laek you whether you bad two boarders in that house Ide not know, there might have been more have been less ; t Witness decline answering AT A. 1 decline an | ue for It ere not twelve bw A Ide ether they bad thelr frienés to, call ; ‘there were entiomen #ho called to see them. ‘A Juror—What did you do there? A. I kept the howe . Q. They paid you beard’ A. Yes. @. Lia your boarders attend to any business in the house? A, | 60 not know. Q. Lid they attend to any out of the howe? A. I do not know whether they did or : i Q. fou cannot tell the appearance of that girl? A. No. rir. Q. Can you tell the ages of the A. 1 Could not tate. Q. Were they young girls or old women’ A. I couli not aay were pot old wemen, I do not remember what the was charged with: | was out of the town and when | come home { was told she had teen arrested she was discharged, acd the came back there, I don» hnow where the is; [do not know her name; I knew a ‘woman of the nome of Ellen Melvor, and a woman by ‘he pore | Ellen Doogan, I donot know whether they were mari ied. Q. How long ¢id you keep « boarding house of that de , On an averager scription since you came to the elly? A. I commence! | in 1846, Q And crntir it) 18647 A. J cannot state pov tively; I might. :+« J uiglit not. Q. Did you kuow a worman called EMaabeth Van Tasve! otherwise called Cherry? A. | do know euch a woman Q. Lid you know Jack Cherry? A. No sir, Q Did you know Jack Van Tassel? A. 1 bave roen bie at my house; I never lived with him sor he with me never war intimate with kim, I ¢o not know whether I bnow Joreyhine Stephens, who was practhing *hop vitiog: Ihnow nothing about her; 1 do not know Mim beth Cox, J know Anne Yan Nostrand otherwle Aunt Egerton? @ She wos know ass panel thief! A. Ido not kovwo Did you know Jemes Fgerton ! A. I eaw him. Q. Lid you known Rebecea Cherry’ A. I knew her | cannot (ny where; I knew Jim (alagher aa Capt. Green Q Iid you know Moll Hodges? A. 1 saw her at my howe. @ Did you know a man of the name of Mory’ A! ow bin. Q. hid you know that Fish was abeen! from New York because cfs complaint t hel Al4 Q. War Fieh arrested In Boston within two eooks for theit) A. [decline snewering that question. Q. What id Stumrt say oe went to tatk with bia ule git! A. lhade with bia about it Q You tol¢ um that in the fall of 1647 Judge Stusrt eo to see you wf 213 Church street? A. He conzinvet i» calls on m¢ from the first time I vaw him at the potice UIE T made the linge aginst the Spaniard. Q Whom did ke see there? A He saw me there; 1 do Bet know that he «aw body else. Whea did you rat become acywainted with Con vol- ly? Ay Peannot state, Q. About when A, Leould not give yeu thet auswer. Q. Can you not teD us how ou hed known hia at the fine you wore merried to him? A. TL eannot tol, @. At the’ time you married him did you know witat hia business was? A. Hetold me he was @ butcher; [ neve) bnew thet be carited on business of ny pet Q. Had you heard of kim being a hotel thiet? A. I bread rie og of the kind; 1 do not recolivet ever having 1d i. Q When aid you frst ive with Connolly? A. I deeline wmewering Utut ques.ion. ocwvell—it appease there is no invpropriety in tint question I; 1 Con’t like toanswer it; I dow’t remem- Whoes—W der exactly !hetime; I never placed my mind with that date partioul sly, Q At avy time after he commenced to live with you did ho leave ov, or did you sepseate in any wayt 1 have 2 the least recollection of w at present. Q Wa: be net absent from you for a year? A. Be came to New York in Jely, 1864, from Ningara; he wae not ab- sent for more than two or three days at a time after ha Q. He Bed been at the State prisomat that tlme had he not? 4. 1 never kuew such a fret; he might have been, and’be might aot, Q. Ind you or cid yor not know that while he was liv- ing with 3, he was sonvicted and sent to State prison, and that ho stayed there aa lovg usa year? A. I don’t know that; he had lives with me betore he went to Nie- gare; (know I received lertors from hiny that year from cifferent places, from Louinville, from Vicksburg, and from St. Luis; I might hove heard that be was in State prise BD, Aud I might not; Lbave no recollection of sucha in 2 ‘The Court here took o recom for twenty minutes. Atter the recess the witnos» again came on the staad, and ‘be cross.examination was continued. Q. You said that Judge Stuart's visite wore friendly visits; that be took an interest in you, and said he wished you to leud a different sort of life; did he explain to you why he took that interost ip yon't A. I don’t recollect; Thad not toid him anything oulonlated to exette hie in- terest. he »nid I ought to be an ornament of society, in- stead of being as 1 was, and that he would like to se me living diffecent from what was, [ told hi would be very happy to do #0 if my clreumptances would permit me to that converration took ptace sometime, perheps, in 1949 or 1850. Q. Wes it not repeated after’ A. At the te { saw bins iy Jefferson Market, and tokd him that I was married to Convolly, and also in'the conversation I had with hin in Harvison street; be said I was very fohiish to marry 8 man Ike him; | cannot stats the month he «poke to me that way In Harrison street, but Ivaw him in the months 4} of May, June and July. G. When he first saw you im Harrison street did you tell him that you lived there + A. T told him my oister lived there, but did not tes! him the name; I told bin I livet there, but I di¢ not; but } made appolatinents to meet him there; he tald we afterwards that he found out I did not live there, and T said it would be very incon- venient for my sister, baving gentlemen boarders who night know me, to live there, Q bid you tell him cc had given up that business for ever? A. I told hm bad: rented my house furnished, ond that I would nevergo back there again ; that L was Obgusted with housekeeping, and would’ not go. to houeeheeping again. Q Before that, did you toll Judge Stuart that Connolly wanted to come back to Uke city, and to reform, and to ge into the market? A T told him be would not cone to the city to go imte business where ao weny knew Lim, but that he wished to have his cage sottled, and to commence business in some #mall place whece ho would be respected, and his family also, . I think not; he did Q. Was any place apectiled ¢ not rsine any place ; do not know whether that winall lace was to be in New York, in Massuchuestts, or in . not the only object you had in gotting this nelle prosegui entered that he cout! come ore to this chy? A, We wanted to could not be arrested, rs vue here? A, Not to remain here; he, of coe here if there was nothing againat Q Pid_you ever tell anybody that rome man had pro- mised to furnich the capital to enable him to commence business in the market’ A, Idid not say that; I said there was «wan of the name of Burnet!, with whom he served bis time, who would help him tu business, and that ‘here was a man of wy acquaintance who wo@l as niet ip If bo woud reform, Q. Tid you say that yor had an sequaintance in the market? “A. | do not recollect, Q. Well, was that the fact? wertng. @. Did you fell Stuart that it was a man in the market who was bo arrist Connolly {f he wont Into business? A 1 do not reeolleet if 1 told him tt wae » ian in the mar nd of ours; this person does not live in the # business here. et the matter setiled, so that he vat he did not wand to come to A. That 1 decline an- ado bosiness in the t tolling Judge Stuart that ja the market his business in the market at any tine ¢ ove not anKwer. . he in the butter and egy business’ A. No str. Q What ae you waiting for’ A. 1 do not like to an ewer the question. Juege Roosevelt to witness.—If your answer will not criminate you, you are bound to answer it. Wiiners.—I cannot answer fc. Q When you talked about the intention of Connolly to retorm, did you t it? was it true or falsey A. T believed he was sincere in ut, @. When did you cume to that conclusion ¢ state the time. Q. Lwant to know at what time it was yon began ty be Neve that Connolly was rincere in his intention to referm? A. Tcanpot remember the time. Q. Were you stneere yourself in your intention to re- form, whe you raid you was disgusted with housekee. A. LT eannot ing? A. That was eo, and [ never will keep honse aguin. T told Judge Stuart 0. I have avoided my ol arsosiates vince 1847, T tcld Lim so, Q. Down to the time that Judge Stwart spoke to you about money, I wish you to state to the jury what rea ‘ons be had to wish to .¢e you in a different sort of Iifer A. He told me that he was very sorry tuat I )iad married that man; and that if he had known he was my hasband —(witners interrupted.) Q. When Connelly was arrested by the name of Cox grove, who first told you the fact of his arrest? Witness ire answering who told me. y—Well, you must answer, except the Court hall not. Judge Rovsevelt—I seo no objection to your answering this question. Witners—I do not think it fy necessary been arked that question on the other #ide. Jodge Roovevelt—It by a proper question. Witness—A man by the name of James Clark came and informed me; Ido not know what his occupation «as; | never beard to my knowled Q. Who preeured Mr. Frink to beeomo the ball for Con- nally? A, Not me, ele, [never eae Mr. Frink till T met him’ at Mr. Smith's office, to give him a mortgage on my property; ! think [heard Mr, Connolly say thas he had seen Mr. Frinkjbefore, but had forgot who he was till be saw hin. he $1,000 wax gave on the 2d of April; herent me a note ar’a ean; | sued Mr. Frink on tt; that paper is In the Court Common Pleas or in the Superior Court; the «uit bus ver been tried of determined; Mr. Stuart told me t 1 pued bim in the name ofa next friend; I cao not state precisely how the paper reads; I think it ix x0 * Received $1,000 from Margaret M. Duval asa joan, 244 April, 1854, J.B. Frink;” that money was mine, [hod one and lot on 12th January, 1855. 1 do not wn it now, circumstances compelled me to sell it I have not @. And you owm no real estate? A. Nothing, exo»pt was left to me by my gi in the 41 gave it for the support of my inether m which never has been divided; I do not « value of it; 1 ¢o not know what Mr. Frink ef with the mortgage or the furniture: tt cost me rear 61,000; 1 bonght most of it in 1860; Frink sald he would not charge anything for going>all, bat only the use of the money; Mr, Frink understond at the ‘ime that he gave trial; Mr. allerwarda. ho employed Mr. fmith to attend to that eas hat Connolly was not Frink talked with me aout the agree id anybody give him @ fee to your knowledge A. 1 do not like to ray. Judge Koopevelt—J nee no objection to your answering Witnes—Yoo, sir, be got hix foe, the Welnesda: ursday following bis arrest 1 brougit him down #)00; er his bail, we went down to Mr. Sinith says he, ‘Con , You owe me $65, and Mrs. Duval will bring it to me, I promined to it the following Tharelay, 1 did eo, but | did not see bi leew Mr. Gray, paid him the mo ond took his receipt for tt. le there anything more due him’ A. | do not koow him @ dollar; be applied to mo to fee him in ink case, but T did not give It to him; he wanted me to give his $160 for attention to the bail ouse in the month of August or September following, but I dit not give it to bis. ©. When was it that Stuart told yoo that he bet a« rob infinence as Jim Smith with Mr. Hall? A. He wld me that before he was elected, and afier be w elected; T thought from the eymversstion that the wee a kind of antipathy tetween them | f wily satisfied thet if Mr. Smith knew where Connolly was, he would inform on him of his where abouts; be waa acting ax counsel then for Mr. Fri ond | aid pot feel willing to place any confi sence in hem titer Mr. Connolly waa tailed out, {remember Mr. * that they wanted me to fee for his being employ Mr ¥ripk, 1 never told any boly that I war w bring Mr. Comnolly into the eity, as My. mith w on acectnt of his fee aot being paid. In November | wee veal ing in Philadelphia: Mr ean oly was away | wae business there, | hired « emall place aud lived that I ¢ o pet {2 om by myvelf; there were no other persons in the house | ov U pied the whole house myretf; it was amall; I hired | in the latter part of December or January, the name of the perron from whom 1 hired that house is Hanbert, | hed ro vieiiers there: & lady acquaintance care ty #0 me bere and that wae all; «lady who keope a email hread ond needle store and works at drememaking | cama rio'e where Judge Btuart fret told me he woult procure ard my oo ©. You fixed « date yerterévy on the 10h of Februwry. when Joe tw Mr. #tuart, ard be tid you be would se Mr fiell, emt see whak cowl be dime, tx there any mirishe shout thet? Af think at To clock I went to Dis house the lith of F the matter for that was not ¢ es: a ge J e's day, and you can come T nat so long was not the t fay that poy in the-ofice, lentine’* day waa gigs in the courts; thet is the the night of the 14th we him the five hundred dottars; ight that he wanted wwe to lowing morning, at the ‘hoe that E started in Lirpenard street and Brosdway, to 4 bad walking under fost, and 'it raked; - tment at one time to meet him aa curly as 8 o'olbck, ut it was long before that—I menn aoume days; 1 believe that was the onl appointment 1 ever had with him so carly; it was at his hours, and about thin aifalr. Q. IMd yonever say that you made an-appainiment to Febraary? that following morning wan "the ategoat the corosr of wa) meet him in the office at # o'clock on tho $ T do not; I do not recoBect Jury. Q, Dit you ever swear that on the Uth Febru: Stuart told you he had seem Mr, Hall, and that the Prosqui would cost $500" A. Not to my rooollection, ate; it was before that ho told me no; the monoy was drawn. on the 1th of February, aad T handed it to Judge Stuart about 11 o'clock, Q Did you ever swear that you appointed to meet him at bis office at 8 o’clook on ‘the morning, of the 16th: February f that Pte did meet him? that then and there told you hed veom Mr. Hall? that he eoukd manage the matter for $500, and then that yeu went to the bank and drew the money’ A, Not to my knowledge: there must bea mistake somewhere; | met hin before at 8 o'e! , but not on the morning of the 15th. want to correct any part of your sintement esterday; thaton the Lith of Febraary you weat down stage from the corver of Mapenatd street aad Brond- that you drew $500 eat of bank, came back to Stuart's ofice and paid bin the money’ A. That isso, what I stated. Q. Did you ever swear that instead of that being the care you met him in his offiee at 8 o'clock on the morol: of the 16th, that he then told you hehad peon Mr. Hell; that he would manage the maiter fr $600, and that you then went to the bank and dow the money? A. [tI did ewear to that, it was a mistake; I do not recollec a not go to Judge Stuart's office at $ o’slock that morning; I cid not ask Judge Staart (or a receipt when | handed saying #0 before the Grand Lim the money; I suppose be would not give me pt Thad the best of contidenee in him at that thao; Thad po idea that ho was goog to play a trick apon ma; [ never swore so; I did say tat on the night be kept me wailing so long 1 thought the: Gid not at the time 1 paid him the money entertain any nurpicton that he was going to play me false, ©. Did you swear thiem—He took the money and gave me ‘no receipt, and I suspected wi that thme I iaigit bo deceived—did yon wwear that? A, You Aid not ask ime that question; I did aweat to that before the Grant Jury, Thad bern bailied about 60 much, that I trusted no per hy confidence in him a in an; every ono, and thoaght he to give me » receipt; but then again I looked af it in light: “he may be sfrwid to give mo a reeatyt, ba will do what is right,” on the evening he kept me wait ing he tok? he wason Uke Molies Committes, sat «ait be would tell the police not to seroxt him; he waid the Police Committee mot onfa Friday, and that he was on ‘the emmmitice, amd that he would’ tell the police there Was ancl prot entered against Congreve, wud that (the came tothe city, {mould keep rome of thore who did not k might arrest him, ny night, after } paid him the mor 1 did not go there, I think on Frid night, not on if); | was there was something wrong; | y night Me. Brady—(re the delivery of th ing miuutos from Grand rifivate) Is that «tatemen ~ was that paper written on Saturday night? A. Yo, «lr, wear (hat, and that envelope was given with it. Q. Did you swear expressly befure the Gea you received this paper y, bears think vot, sir; Ttold them could not ray exactly what duce, but that it was the same week [gave hin the reduce both the papers—meanicg both certificates—in the Gra A. Mr. Hall prode them) the paper that Mr. he nol prot was there alec I got these papers from Judge Stuart rs Sonight por—moaning the one written udge Stuart got on the 17th Yon swore yesterday that the let re inVhiladelpbia wns tuggla tnd that Mtowrt asked y fa had and he said he was glad y in hi b ing, nor in that of Eider you swear before the Grand’ Jury that that lotter Stunet’s wriling? A. Lthink | tated it was not bis writing; [ then that it was not; but that letter in your hand ing the cortificate—1 swore was In Stuart's hand wilting, Q. Did you ewear before the Grand Jury that your husband dest tletter? A. He did destroy It in nme day we received it; | wanted to but he sald No, we will destroy it ax re « af knew just ax much about tt then as Ido now, but my mind might have been confused ant | no’ recollect it; Itold Mr. stuart | eupposed we w to give this may Kerr something | and (twas e that be gave me $100 to operate on kerr: | was not given the cpportunity to tell that before; he told me he would re turn me the whole, and if | thonght proper to make him a present of a nice watch and chain I night do ao, Q. You fixe! that $50 as the price of the tricky Irieh man’ A. 1 old not tix it; I maid he did not wheb top ente my bustand, and J raid that if at any thine $60 would bean object for him to ke ay and pay his exposes, I would let him have it; he declined to take it; Jadge Steart was not, to my Neowleson, oat of town 0 lon apa week between the 18 ‘aly till he was taken ole in August, there was a day in that period when | made an apotntinent to see him, and dit not see him, I do not think there were more than two days | did not «ee him— there was pot s week [ know, ©, Who exiled on you in Beaten to eome on with Con polly to ree the Dintrict Attorney? A. I decline answe ing that question Y. Ob! anewer, was it got Mr. Bartiy A Mr. Burtls i! call on me, and nd hie wife and me came on to York Q. Petore Rurtia ype ke to you Mid anybody ask you to comeon? A. Ob! Ub emnised to Mr. Stuart tr come on; noone in Boston, to my knowledge ome on, Q. Did you recetve any letter, asking me om to the efty of New Yor testify? &. Sot to my know ledge; } do not re 1 do not know that Con nolly received 4 letter, I know that we reselve? letters from our relatives ail the while @. Did you see any letter in Mr. Connolly's place wale ing you to come on, received from anybody in the elty of New York, except Mra. ish? A. 1 do not reeolinet, 1 came on first sloue to New York; L war sent for t go bo Mr. Smith's office: Mr. Dartle spoke to me on the stoop at the corner of Watt and Varick streets, @ house oo a family of the name of Mowatt; Burtis asket me 4 the Recorder's office, anit said I wonld hen the slightert Mes of what was wanted with me Burtie eaid I might go and hear oom vermstion be. tween Mr. Hail and the Heeorder, and | might not my yeelf, and | ald that under there cireun: would go. ou not receive a letter from Mre. Fish, saying ioe oh nil teatided against Stu Veh rts would be relieved from pro ition io A. No. for I never saw much a letter or tnetlos aekel me to om WO oe what bappeoet whem Hall vent to my wither t that thine you stated you were 1 sald, “You, | did wave thet r Whe was that gentiens and i declined telings he tlt me then, if | anewer wuch questions as showk! be aske! me ant no 6 Gren Jury, am tal tre th, my bustand whoa 1 thst tnterviow sll heard & hour Mr. Br might bave beem there fifteen or twen te, brut | patdiy think it coger than that Purtis did not go on with tne to Bowion Sreturned to the city sent oven. tog: wy hate: th me tothe ety Me. Barty wet we at the I three weet t Mr. Ha” > togther jt was now three © Vek and the yoeetion of MA) varn , senane = ender? yer repiere’ it anpeneant tor 4 sether wae & gen mnan of the Jewish persuasion, shove Fabbeth shoult on uerar se vardey— the one 4 aot wieh to remale ant the fonteth, sad oo ther bed eetuplen about violating Fay the conrt, at 8 o'clock P.M SAlorurr nt ty Monday, ot 10 AM otersianding Weiag Oat it the benlin of the wad permit he neratep wi candle tight. vom 4 nowy eventing tet! week would be oom enhewrat to close tt on PRICE TWO CENTS: THE GREAT WAR EXCITEMENT. The United States the Battle Ground of European Parties. THE GREAT CELTO-AMERICAM INVASION PROJECT. - THE RUSSO-AMERICAN PRIVATEBRS. The Angle-Amertcan Enmtist- ment Scheme. Historical Sketch of All these Curious and Remarkable Movements. Their Astounding Affect ou Public Opinion Abroad, THE INCREASE OF THE BRITISH WEST INDIA FLEET, &., &., &. The great excitement created in Engind in regard te the threatened wav with the United States and the at- leged causes for tae incroase of the Kngiluh fect om the American coast, Deing #0 extraordinary and peculiar, that we have felt # » duty to group together all the fate and reports on the subject. Our compilation forms» vory curious and very remarkable historionl sketch, I should Le carefully saad. The mort alarming movement, mccording te the Landes Times, in the threatened tuvasion of (roland. We therefore begin with what wotimnow of— THE IRISH FUIBUSTERING MOVEMENT. The histery of theyrest Celto-American organisation by which it i# propos to invade Ireland and emanctpate her from the British yoke, tm spite of her protests to the contrary, forms an eeveedingly curious end inatructive narrative, It showmthat politically speaking races, ithe animals, can occastonally cast their skins. The fate whioks haw attended all simYar combinations of our Hibernian fellow citizena in this country had led unreflecting aa@ prejudiced people to wappowe that the new movement would ond, like its predecersoes, In a fiasco, The Lomdom Times and others of our Koglinb contemporaries havo, hew- ever, discovered that it ip progmant with}anger, and amag poneibly come tom head, Under this now view of the cage we think it useful at the prosent moment to place before our readers all the fot and documents connected with the origin and progress of thia orgunizstion. It wilt assist them in forming « jadgment as to the (mminesoe of the catastrophe whiol in now frightening the Heitiae inlew from their prop riety, The first evidence which we had of the existence of thie new Irish movement was preneated to us (n the Cullowing magoiloquent avnouncemeat published in the New York Weekly Citizen and Irish organ, on the 26th ol August last — GREAT STATE CONVENTION OF IRISHMEN IN MABBA- CHUERTTA. On the 14th inst. 8 most important convention todie lace in Moston, It is, we believe, the firrt convention af rishmen ever helé in Mamachusetta, and the test ever held in the United States, fur the particular object fee wich It was called. It ke’ the firwt great yractionl rea: ponsd in any State, to the letter of “One Who Would Go," recently published in the Citien, The soclety has beom in existence for rome the, but of late the ortantsstles as epread with so great a rapidity, that the Hoard of Liccctors deeued it accomary to hold a convention of the delegate frv 0 difterent parts of the State where brenches of the aacelation had been planted, in order to take measures for S18 permanent government, and the atvancement of the great object for which It was called into existence. Each branch sookety had the privilege of Leng reprerented by two delegates; the number of gates in attendance waa Mighty seven; number of towns besides twenty five delegates fren credentials were dieputed, aud to egularity there was not tune, in view proving matters; the number of names enrotled books of the parent society, about four thoumad. Th were twelve invited guewts, repreentiog seven States. There have been admitted since the convention one thousand menibers, representing twenty villages aud towns, and lotters were every day pouring into the secre tai adinialon. Money wes also seut im freely, snd 4 at tho dixposnl of the directory, tar which they gave bunds to ye urn it to the partes gab it be ot reribing, alter the lapse of’ a given perlod, 10 used fer the purpose for which it was lov ignad. If succes attend the movement im Ireland, then the bonds will be redeomed with taterest and with honor. Much of the suceess of the movement is due to the character of the men ap ted to govern lt, partioular- Ty the energetic Hecrotary, whose praction as a physicles exceeds that of any other’ wedieal gentleman ta Boat and who, berlder, la potse-ned of real estate worth $100,000, The names of all the Directory are « guaran- tee to the communtty that the funds in Veer hands wilt be taken core of, ones will guide thele movements, They « property, respectable vition, and well known We are happy to haveit in our power to annwunre that a ¢maller aoclety, extabr Hirhed In the #tate with the same vbject, amalgamated with the ‘ Irich Emigrant Ald Soclety,”’ and that mow there is but one bedy, and that working harmoniously their native land from the opprea- slavery of centuries. Toere had been some dif- ference of cpinlon Yetween the two orpenizatic that Sy now removed, the volew of fwethon te alle everything Initeates success. Irishmen have begun ve find out that union is etrength, and that eystematle plans of action are w 1y necmomary for the overthrow of Bistieh deminton in Ireland The delegates assembled at the (mene hall of the k and after the tranaee National Varieties at 10 o'eh the following resolu tome Ving of preliminary bue were unanimously adopt rte rar In view of the entangling alliances betweem of kurope, we believe that the good tine ae wed har arrives, when Vnglaus's diffeulty hme ty. We the Directors of the specdient and must effy ing and directing the © on in & course of netlon parieotly ty and obligations fo Amertos, Lat tending to cause of liberty (a our natlve tly «wel that the that opportantty for ved and wanting whieh they «nf. whrated + us martyrdom That we cordially inv y, order, of company Whee object aid alin er that being bound im the strong in the falth uf w righta @ the coopers tion oh f eo) bre we earnestly rer onpend Ute genered wm of the friends of Leeland, fr mm the pei held lyae ie the city of hew York, tor the purge aye of action Uhroughout the Ube colonies, aa to adeyt an addres Wy coe beethren im Leland, exhorting them w ve of good cuners, for thate friends in America are wp and doing, ond Qhet hey eiald net te let alone in the wiregele. The following spirtled ailrens was the. ree and amend mmously edoy! el LOK OF THE ACRORITS (a UEANT 6D ROCmRE i Prnscw Cov rey wae —The thee hae ag. action, Every rteamer that creme the shores bringy intelligence of frech Aimmaters, hetress aA difheni'y our old inveterate fre Lakus, Urerefure, unite ins bend of brotherhood to ald the cause of Mberty low Ireland. The moment \s propithus—the meagre are in our bande, It as oom (hem —one them wibh prafence, «ith caution, bot with devited el the Petormination d men, wheee birthright Le Gesttaa ot venge fam vies of w of replee, of Yyrammy, (ae aammale uf the w Remember Limerick Shell ant Mhibter- teen) Ant oh. remember Che long, bitter years of exile, an think A thet beswtifal inn’ the hows of your ehilde howd and your alle clam, where reyeae the sabes of four fathers snd the wartyre of your rece oo" effort be wonde wo wrest the teland from ¥ pirate whe hae oo beng belt ber im the gripe @ tyrenmy, de. eored the energies of ber poopie sad dam) then of heir tnbverttence Tt te for her exiled chilliren Vo omy, shall this conse, am Ireland be free, or shall the tyrant Genet « perpetual tenant right of the country they wait only the ax the The wep tn lrelent are reaty rurance of oor sympathy emt ab) wily experience of (ht past ‘hey have ovseed or The mind of the eowutey le broting over the vartnees of the opportanity presented wo it It ress bier (he calee of « Veet magecine, waiting bul © a we siectrieity Wo towel 4, to Gare fark in a twerthle ea~ jieton Fngiien sergeant sets reereite la vain, tor the spares the © Milling, and Wares write vi heart to ctap the herve with whigh « braate