The New York Herald Newspaper, January 31, 1854, Page 8

‘This ordinance was fa of the constitution in 1760, when the Southern States I therefore do not ity (ete ge a Bie gs mage Sonne Tate ies ws soquired. by an Fem vrees 0a Poa Fe a dh Ege they Revs | were contrmed by the Necthorn ond wae nad =e d that te low ° territory known as Louisiane, which em- North | Powers that held as slave Btates: thet advise them and affords a new, ani therefore easy soll to cultivate, braced all the territory now the subject ries eh, sereeamee eehermenmtinseaten: Cappianee) pane bak at my with extensive prairies. There can be no doubt but that, | ¢ 0) and in relation to we have mot this | the North, and the North had taken sway 20 I do nos stand bere as an abolitionist; en the ‘but you shall to some extent, tlaves will be immediately introduced, | (ning, ‘All that territory lay weet of the Misvlasippl, ‘the South”—nelther had surrendered aay oe cate. ‘I stomd here te raise my voloe to guarantee and confirm says the law is not Combertinc eee So Src tine tertinry ahould deal | north of Texes, bounded om one side by Missouri; He goes on further, and apenkesivestiy of those somspro: | 10 the Southern States every principle and every right tnd we fy lect to become a free Stace,” tn ihia criss ho exo | nine Coareee of laittade forms the boundary lie, and the | suises.” Mr. Senator Douglas, i Dia great seal for the {nati runraatood by th orginal compromise of the eon ey ave recived rome & @. ‘ three or four A . great. requisites ca the part of the North aremoderation | ‘2*7!tory taal Hed aay eg haere = oo con cea ter "Guion, with elt | tbe. South Tecelved i a i —_ ond firmnerh; for although this attempt to vivlate the | 0° 40 was to cganize The prevent tats | mnt stand ae eee Sil | Gritish amecstors, and’ when the compact, of pay aa Missonri ¢: mpromise fa clearly » gros breschof public | {? [ot gma Tt wus the southern portion of it, and | we en a ‘ail ite pom the constitution ' was formed the slave States Daryain, made rey and party faith, end is intended a» an insultiog Genanee the most thickly settled fo attempt was | mises, or we must abolish it, and resolve each State nto | were admitted and their Fights were guaranteed forever. ‘representatives of to free America as well as Europe, still fairness and 6004 | nigag tg aboligh slavery in Tonieen-ah oer vet tal its native elements.” Ave we therefore, to re- | Thenext territory that was acquired was Floride, and, as constitutional, and Posy tapas ime ne Siena a a parcel of theie aysiom. Louisiana was admitted as the compact that our fathers have prepared for us? os ‘terri eee about pelt sate tet ‘meals st admi ti of Provi with fe a. ting slave h ‘was no are but ‘the Isborious slaves of the virtues, and conso. | Duhks SAMS MATE M da gress, by virtue of the owes {apples Wh ae ee ee ad ae elded the whale of it to, ‘The next oom. mea—but the quently the meditated outrage is sure to be prevented, OF | Wath they bad for purpose, imposed certain condi. ape by the tution. I, and territory was that called Louisiana, acquired | same States by bresk, in else In cue tine, to be fally and effectually reversed: ona upoa this Btate of Loulslans, in reference to this | ont ponent cae , they ooartivation with all 4m 1608 from Franoe, by purchase, and there wae the | Tso, the barpaie that they bore made tp 1870. Its, : very rubject of slavery. It is shown that Co " dusts clorious memories promise known Missourt therefore, Congress LETISE POM EDWIN B. MORGAN, M, 0. See eeh wot cal ts redte tactic: wiowe fase tiie Oe, oe ee tet the cenzomnin of 130 | mee What was itt "Why, iat Mlssoarl, afiee'e they abotld rather tiuow thle bands in the fire Hoo Union except it ls done upon certain conditions, but alto | should be most sacredly kept. (Applause.) Let us see | Sght and battle of two years, might be adaitted as a raise to pass asa law. Now, what they mean Wasi ‘te impose such upon every State—provided’ it be reasom- | what excuses are offered for folsting in’o this bill what | #Ave State on the express condition—it was solemnly 2: y ing that the com of 1860 superseded that Gerpan—I b able snd py ‘they have the right to impore such rea- | vir ‘mally defeats the compromise of 1820, It is.said that | Slared by the South and the North—thast slavery and = 18: ‘that a clause in the constitution of the United tion to be present sonable conditions as they may think proper. The pre- | theTerritery of Nebraska jetains the same relation to | Voluntary Tce a ann yer oy ee States says that all States shall reserve all the powers York, to protest agaivst tte repeal or violation of the Mis- | sept State of M'ssour! oon: titated part of that territory— | slavery as did the territory acquired from Mexico pricr to | crime, Fe a deiae tine borth Iati- | that are not expetanly Galegated to. Congrens, Tass souri compromise, | would gladly join im any suchdemon- | the ps:t that laygiveasest to the south line above | 1950. This may be true in fot does this furnish a | tude be ited forever. Arkansas be. | means that the Stat which formed the otration, and {1 lord me unbounded satisfaction to | where Louisiana was, ard west of the Misslesippl good reason for rej came & = was s portion of the | federal Union should retain all the powers that unite, not only wih the merchants, mechanics and others | In 1818 the Tvrritory of Mississippi applied for admission | Mnise was de the nam; of Lonislene, and the they dia not thea part with; and sc they are reserr of the city of Kew York, but with the people of our whcle | asa State, This was thefirst attempt: The application | slavery the and the free territory of ote | edtothem. But does that toush the question that Con- State, Infresisting this wicked breach of faith. Slavery, | was wade in the Houne ot Representatives. The applica- | Amersa. was also formed out of it, There is the compromise in tu iegard to territory subsequently aire, not content with imprisoning the free citizens of the | tioh was mace to admit her withont reference to slavery, power of this immense tract of land is yet to come. For three and Cah ieee pe Mis- | ghoula not fix the terms on w! the States from North when they peaceably enter » Southero harbor—not | which would have Jeft her free to have admitted slavery | was in view of this that the compromise was made. Th souri compromise was maintained unq: every | it should be admitted into the Union? If you anil are satisfied with consigning tos frlon’s cell women guilty of | into the State, if abe had been admitted ia ths form in say that the virtual repeal of cess: section of the country. It was held to be an ob! in ‘rabip, and conclude to take in another asa teaching children to read the Bibls, but fushed with the | which the application was made, Members of Congress | ry to gire effect to the com, constitutional enforcement, and of emphatic, ji ‘partoer, surely we may take him in on terms dif. trumph of having exacted from ‘the North the enact- | saw the necessity before any portion should be admitted, | 3h they not repeal it? That, even Senator Douglas hes | binding. The other compromise was that of vd and | ferent entirely from those of our exiginal artnership. ment of the in’amous Fugitive Slave law, now, | to begin the work of prohibiting slavery and tocheck it | not the nerve to propose. say that this compro. | that is called the compromise in to New Mexico fore, whea Congress has that States and when interest prompts, serke to break down the only bar: | atevery step. It was introduced into the House ef Rep- | mise has become inoperati be that if it has become | nd Uteh, The South has received at various times | territories aball mot come in exeapt ‘under certain Fier that has prevented its balefal extension orer nearly | recentatives ard passed by © large and overwhelmtog | inoperative it has been virtually repealed—that to all | other large portions of territory that have been devoted | terms, they have violated neither the letter nor the nite, i Bh ci there on be neither | majority. The conditioo that beta Sey v3 ede intents and it ie repealed. This compromise S pare A and nes en nem wevayrte Pred spirit of the 0 none *) I the rights sm meeres Teason nor pretext for the North to slumber longer over | ed in 1818 was entirsly successfal as far as it went. ey ter a braska. But thes 7 iy ; their socumutated wrongs. The slave power seeks tore- | was not taken up in ‘the Senate, and the bill was not eget 4 facie oy rere is no violation | s voice not coming from the South—I do not lay the tnd thre ihn onl diureneetbg ad Bai Teerved rt) ye ry oe ccoaly entered inte, and for many yesrs | taker up in that year. It was aot until 1820, ireaped of the Missouricompremise. On this subject I shall say | blame upon the South—a voice comes from ‘len jues' inviolability. The free States, oa the | that the bill finally passed. That epoch develoy nothing. The compromise and the measure are | Politician of » free State, as an after ht, other hand, without beas'ing of their honor or chivalry, | the ivtellectua rice of the Gresteut tsa ta this | Pon eS. you, amd shall have apres Whether | which he had reported to Congress hanced bevioas have faithfully abided by {ta terms. It is right, then, for ‘admission of Missoari Jras 1'dose's viola. | 14a, that the eighth section of the act preparatory to | tinction of terms. (Applause.) ‘The constitutional us, 60 far as the constitution will allow, to lay theaxe at | asa State ended in her being received without the pro- then with s view of asving | the admission of Missouri into the Union Lana iy Pr of Congress to regis ia the root of this ever-eneroaching power, and prohibit tt# | hibition of slavery, but upon the conditioa that slavery | the honor of the Sonth—yon will raise your voices | by the compromise measures of 1850, Hore is - pede seven years. ope in the ordinance of 1 g f i zi ! F : Hi j es i Fs 3 i 3 extension now and forever, Thanking you for your invi | should be forsver prohibited in every other part of the i pithy rotedt so loudly that it may | 6UAge—- w ceded jorth western Territory, and tation, I am comp’ lied to decline ita acceptance by more | territory which Bea been acquired. by eeasion from teense. tt aceasta Rother Staten (Oneering = rz at the constivasion and laws of the United States which | that territory was declared to be free of slavery for- Me AOE Pea See iam MURGA | oct’ ultiutattunmnttiniae earands i etree | Bpplatme) hare trowpaned tao much upos your wns | S502 wits th wile fruity. o Mtrany a i 7 ‘en ai the 1 salsa weint DAWINL 5. JOMNB, Ms. 6: tha: Yerritory, eclely ama exclusively, snd not to any | My pets yay eee te foci prciigs rh Freperstory'g the sadiiion of porate Ua r tog that wh pariy Wassinatos, D 0, Friday, Jao. 2 Ht rican ‘ — at — pt ge peers yng We intend to bring forward this evening, I shall now | rroved Mareh G18), whieh » sone End Fairty third Congresses, by. & ouusti‘dsasy | Violating that compromise, it, certainly refers to that and no other. Ithss been said that has no | tian ef tte fad bas a eee mae pielase 9a ter meee: right to ea eoe any Rewer img morepd poet CE aoe el eighte f =~ Slate it’ © nall ead yold;” but Lo ‘nes the gentle the rea a pf meg cpr tared ee mit State bad t oganiae & Teritory The rovers" ‘ot | And sulla. emily denoted tothe tranquility, welfare, Bond ‘tnoparatire—a, Night gentle word for _tullieat on. ore tok Pine. No saa then Soe doable fre” tha Nevvante Bits sine») tins an | 10" har power pone can soak al ‘edi rales | Bt Sibel Ceca ganar ina ater tga Fag are le | terme foro and Sates sal bo eae. micfitemtenion frm ngs ooncny. in | Rute Ts epee Mean at are to | Sauer ey Rae CEN ccc | mata act. cae Murvasicmetzace: | Soi a nat Sot bomad sed urloyed wa tho mgt fue | te) tue omit ail acdeanan ast of oomuame | [AM Gamael anions tae aren aa at | Ney Menlo and Unb, with be eeuantet ot | te, tea eg 6u) York, from tho forma- | Promise moseures and i ausisuet vigiea wy friend Ju?ge Emmet of the country and their re- | Mid be listened to wi " reree of the peopl a le, and especially by the Senators of 1820, and the compromise of 18! ote thts phd petdnly A Ry Getrag cept that slavery should forever pro- | and Repree: Katives in ¢ jongress sagem bied from the South eee oe fey Fs < ‘si eo first time, how the constitution ought wive from the pages of our statutes all the laws in favor | bitlted except, for, the commission of rime, from | CRSA 4 ous in out opinion, euch an oooasion has | so diforect rahjest matters. that of 1600 copiion 10 the Fagan aby anon th ery fe ee erp of freedom which have been paved for the last fifty | territory which had been acquired by cession from | + Be *: ; ve received large bens om, France. I ask whether Congress had not a right to do » from the presertation in both houses of Congress of | French territory ; the compromise of 1860 applied to the There is no principle better established bn ip Bele gh pli phe a ee _ sro this | tui? Misvowl was edzaltten withoutany RE a Feah vaettOe OF Rhee ae ero eemoand declare inoperative, | territory acquired from Mexico by the peace conclading | usage of a onl ‘ora legislative body, under # constitu. wil be the commenoemert of @ serie, whigh shall proe | bad « right to have nlaves there; but in regard tothe | thedlisourl Gompremise, in these worder Soo. & “het | the war, There was no connection between them-—they | tion, te the best evidence of its construction. Therefore, Jaim the voice of the North to. ve united in fecling aud | ther portions of the territory, here is = simple enact- | further onactod, That in all the territory ooded by France to | Were distinctand independent Ihave De balance | 88 Congress has fer six:y-Ave years exercised the power Sction as one man, ia this atiompted outrage upsa the | Mert, (be result of long deliberation, which stands upon | the United States, under the name of Louisiana, which lice | with great care. The act of 1820 declares that th balance tela ner toe inte for any mae 6 0k et aon Sogdian Fights of the Nerth, so long noteren questioned, burfuily | WF statute book, and disconnect it entirely trom the | Horth of thirty six egress and thirty m'nutos of north Tati: | of the Louisiana territory north of 36 20, forever be | (applanse.). But that is begging the whole ques- admission of Missouri, It stands there as a law by itself, tuds, now enclosed witt in the limits of she State contemplated | free from slevery ; the acts of 1850 only declare that the tion. We are not asking to have anythi done; “Sith great ro-peck, Tau, gesti:men, your ob'tavare | Tein not necenary to inquire what. the motive was in | Laat ieytmnentar snusn a Wwhiok ass paneshant | trHlery acqulredytrom Mexieo may or may act be slave, | Si", ti ie'not to ‘andor We ask for bo lghlation ey Kh ~~ DANIEL 'T. JONES. passing that law—it is sufficient to say that that | have beonduly convioved, shall be forovor prohibited.” as the} people declare, There is no connection be, | a54 on the otheralde, donet wish to see a solemn com| boreansaedtninn evactmen: stands there as the law of the land 8. Resolved, That it is'an indisputable matter of history, | tweem them. I can well understand why this move ied or turn sslde. Will you allow me to teil you LETTER FROM RUSSELL SA4GB, M. 0. But in either view this very proposition came from the | fresh in the memories of our older citizens, recorded 6 | is made, and why an aspiring young candidate for Hovss or RePResENTATIVES, South itself. It was uot the measure of the North. als of our eountey, and fami tarly known to the 7: the Presidency young » Who may wish to \e Wasuraotox, Friday, Jam. 27, 1854. } They said, ‘we will rot admit Missouri except with slave: | §°BeFAtion, that the original settled policy of this natio Cwsar, clutch the crown—may be blinded by his ambition. Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Hamilton, Jay, ‘Sierea WHE higies ) Toner al eee, GextizMaN—I am in receipt of your letter of the 2ist in- ume :? by South on? 4 (Applause, is! ) can stant, inviting me to aitend e spre amas At Gav ee | Th nas tee ek Gen ne ee ee the framers’ of the coasiitution generally, was - | It has been said that the Missouri mise oviginated t the extonsion of slavery beyond the States wherein is | #tand that (more hisses and spplause). I make no sens of New York, without distisction of party, tobe held | gt the North, [a vole ia the crowde Who respered | efuina son. pad she caer war ME Douglancd as mit hie Potitieal toe. “t alr tated, was to the eight ively, 4 equal a a Steen Stoperty took oe sot 3 clap and a Lite Eateroct in the other dren, 8a to thove seven-sigh the, ‘| feo, Tt will thus be seen shat fully On the 80th instant, to protest against the repeal or vio. | fri]” Ie poved by Thomas, of Llinvie. ae Cis wurehased from Franc have the honor of bis personal scquain'ance; but I ean Istion of the Missouri act, whieh forever protisite slave. | igs vcore te G tmay be entitled to | mle 6 Union im 1818, with a constivubi well uxderstnud 0.5, ta the puriait or ap heasrable or. dattwored by Mz. Justice Béwards nto Ta territories north of £630, When I left home, | it, bicause he nursed it and fostered it—and it was | Severy, the North, speaking b relen doce berrentnts dition, he may seek to get political capttal. — aod pleadings, and ry @ Lat of December last, to enter for the drat time on my | through his influence tha: it was carried through. (Ap- | thavin New York the opposition. wi ‘and de | Spplause.) But, gentlemen, let us reason to . They @ Feel points ubite duties bere, I hoped, aad thaa believed, the agita- pluses) Thave traced the history with phe cidedy and was oxhioited at mecting of more than 2,0N cist nay heen eee 1850 eu; the compro- I varied the aspeok of she nate m of the question of slavery, or the violation of solemn | gtterticn, and I find in the reeords that the very first | sens at tho City Hotel, os 0 16th of November, 1819. prosi- | mise of 1820. Then I ask this question—why was it not ‘the * appear sefeosly al end aod, ty aon, coms acts, would not be intro inced into the present Con- | move was made by Mr. Thomas, of Illinois, from which | ded ‘by General Matthew Clark: at wares. it was re- | so declared? Why did not some clause in one of those nu- ‘the a bor » were gress, In this, ism sorry to say, 1 am greatly cisap. | State Senator Douglas cow bai’ pire ere abn Missouri omld not aa very int? | merous bills of 1850 so brvaouneet iy Se ee oa { te tc yunty, wt aah the andatmittedte | Soutvern man, in his pointed. Ibad hoved that afer the protracted agitation, | have bren ac mitted without aoe ptance of this pro- to the spirit ene) wore am excitement and bad fecliog that had arisen between the | portion It ras & A ae ‘by the South, aad ivution, amé injurious to th SCORES Se ee nog Beard eWenenetia? aed pose a ay were Lett, perl? gad be T ouncsive akan Afferent Feo: icns of the Union, in tue ciseussion and pss- | Erged upon the North, The votes vill’ show th at ft ssesion of Supereeded the comprom: and CuY | Why, this is aa if I should assault s man and accuse him | Honally, in she power, ona fiancee’ eatorvestas peak tage of the series of meseurre commonly called the oom | whcever examines the Zvening Post of this day, in which consroversy shat (cheers) take that ground—the father of the com- | of sfitation and disturbing the public if he should hough in the result, state’ Unforeseam, Promise measures of 1860 in wnish ihe North in asquies. | is a letter on this point, will see the truth. Lat every | Clay of Kontuoky,, himselt a Promise of 1820 and also of that of 1860? (AP | cry ont for help, (Goud epplacte} runheaitatingly Jay | tins, bus turneé ous w ho mons onforseaste toy, the cling folt abe wes t-shing & genecoxs and patriotic coucee- | man lock at it. Now, as to the omer of Congress to ADIN, Wak noeeiad GARY eeVRa na tanaen tee, peu) pa aa Se dee cee are ioe ed the agitation to ths committees in Congress. protation af frst blnah seem involv contradietlea: id sresi stad : i" Be from from " aay enw iarge Be ling and popestelg’ by tae Conn treat or tne, | sezene this condition: on Sane fe etltetina ity ad ahee peahtlrien Wonetike | apd from the South—did any Southera men take the | °F Douglas, you agitate. Gentlemen of the South, we J" whon to be 1 time. onstitation sity of shat th ask you to stand by your honor and faith plighted to (860,000, be suffisient to prevent any agitaion of this question | King, of thir Siate— (apple time submitted by P: Monroe to mand that the compromise of 1860 pushed sside that of | S057, ‘nave ne tlntan meet Pin Hoa ~ 3 uiian’, for the present, if not for ail time te come, on the psrtof | fo fisiose logical reasonivg, be oxselles, as | Jchm Qaincy adams, Joba C. Celt 8201 Never, never. It never entered their brain—the | seain, this is « settled thi hat we call in legal the South, cr its professing friends. Yet, im tais the | gli men loned who were competent to judge of bis thought never struck them; it was reserved uatil Jan brase res adjudicaia; when @ is settled by courts Neith Onde hersell radly disappointed, and instead of je demonstraved that ‘Congress nad-power to | compromise, cflered and ard, has] S87), JbOR, Nie. Balirigises So eke Mise Sinnresy (Ap: Prine i becumen & heed festa settled thing, Tob has her generous ard patriotic acquiessence in these moat conditions on a State. I: was also demonstrated | over since been regerded by the American people aa s irm, pause) Inarmuch, then, as no member of Sosevens in | heen settled three and thirty yéars ago, and the Union res teing appreciated by thove woo were the resipients ace Binney of Pennsylvania, one of the ablest law- | inviolable compact, couseorating forever and without recall | 1850 ever took that Ley and caer gel ee ae setae | has been rolling on over it ever since. Of their benefits, we ara met at the very threshold of the | yer known 10 this or apy other ocouatry. It was also | all se sath senzltony pect ot acy yc aha an | in any of the acts of 1860 ever hin! at exolarion | tion to their saying the com of 1850 swallows up Commenorment of the first reesion of Corgress, under® | demonstrated by Jobn Sargent of Phisdelphis, acd by | identity "*iroling and intoromt with the free States. = | of the Missourl compromise, advocates of the repeal | the ocmapromise of 1820. If that is 40 decided let it be we; | possltiiity. The oni zew administration, that owes its existence to its pro- | Cesar Rodney, of Delaware. it was alvo iliustrated aad | iota ‘aud quit claimed to the feo Stats iors consideration | Dave been Griven to anol a ; i but I think that few will bp found to soqaiesce in that | sent plaintift, were to feesiops of and fidelity to the compromises of 1850, and | enforo d by Daniel Webster, who was on the comucitee | sprreveu rarcivec and aekeow ty the slave holding | S7@ued well Now, let us reason and argue with them, | Socuion, (A plans.) The South do ot know what a | Limitihcn sie ih all the previous guaran'¢es wad o-mpaote entered nto in | cf meeting of citizens in the city of Boston. (Gre bi j Leys also before their T have no 0>js0- Es i teh roof oar Ni becanse in this covntry every man is entitled to bis | irieng they West. They bave not sent any gran Telation to thy subject of slavery, brinving ure took to doubt that sane pow: + sbretoning from wees to east, shrough more than el opinicr, and all men rhonld be heard, here and erery- Py Foe scarlt ih coda, very shadowy inverest, was nob entirely unprotected, for measare to abrogate or suyernede. coe of the hitherto ae chin Wi caxameciente by the common voise of the | CoK«rcse el lengstade apd froin south vo Doz where, when they believe they are right, and then go | ‘end to Congress to repeal. that foepearcyernt bem agin sould ‘aly be out off by the unanimous oonsont of sight pas: bnowledged compacts of the Unton, aud I may sey, orgar country. Ii appeared at that tia tants nie — chomp spit gre orn Bays ae ad | ead. Douglas gives the true ground. It is said by others of the North have been by the introduction of this bil. | could YY Wish rae Nope ip ny Keyed fo laws of the ovuntty, for s perios vt over thirty years,im | Congres bad the right to impose oondi far than sil the exicting fre» States, excluding California, | tbAtitis umcopstitutional—that it violates the faxdamen- ‘he power to change, there 1s bething the of the Missouri ast, That this mention other men, now gone to thelr g tua more than ten and S ball times bs aroatas New Terk, | tal principle ‘hat binds the whole Un'on together. Now, ingly coulredictory ia granune i uppewe oe traordipary end startling measure none wil Tallmau.e ond Johan W Tsyior—who made on able argu- ‘to be saatched from | mark me: the amendment ef Mr. Douglas gives the rea- & specific focignated grande! 3Ws CuBerquence rill be most alerraing, if pot destrueti: natrete anc prove this very pewar. Ageia, jor | sopa why :he Missouri compromise is void, and, iY. ould there be soning = ‘to the peace, bappinsas, and prosperity uf tue cuus ‘moc them, have tere beea so musa establishment ‘thercin of slavery, it would inevitably | not because it was uncorstitutional; not a word of tha’ ape Ne Bary ee sanemeg ting ‘thet ‘the the event of its pavsage, is equally certain For if it bs vepoe and power of mind displayed, as | itt rf ue prosrene of one yestern, ype a of | sind was hinted at, but because it was enperseded by the forth, grand at or oe ee Sretan 8 right and Proper to epeal the Missouri rot of oom- tw the Miseourl compromise, It was mot | (ue fee states an gee com prom ise of 1850. Now, Mr, Donglas is an infeltigent rg ret ay promise of 1*20 lark inall candor, if it would not be ‘truggled in; amd the (orce of thougat 5 Resolved, That in regard to the pretence set forth in the er, ® man with es discriminating mind, and if a Ld 8 proposed to the bill now pending before tho | be ht thet the act of 1820 was unconstitutional he ‘To orgenize the Territ-ry of Nobrasks,”” tat the | would have given that as the ressom why the Missouri of the act preparstory to the ‘admission of Mistouri, | compromise was no longer bindizg upon the country. applied to the subject carried conviction to | amendm 3as of 1645, and the compromise measures minds of the whole people You are, all the people of 1860. Task the S»ata to consider th» matter candidly | ae, to judge of the pature of this cor past, It was one; genet Senet teiberox ae and deliberately, before she pute herself in» position to | ard lei us view it in that light, The slavebolding por: | Ni%s for meres was suspended by the principles of the | (ApPiause.) But the only reason he gives—the reason of invite retaliation, for whe may res: assured that but very | tion of the S'ates were desircus to have Miasoari as © | legislation of .S00' Comumoriy called the compromise mes. | oaeons—is that the compromise of 1850 in its pria- few, ifany of the Northern or Wee Sate; the non slaveholding States resisted it, It | sures, and is thorofore and thereby to be dociared imporative, | ‘iples superseded that of 1840. I have read the aga equally right and proper to repwel the joint resolations Fi ¢} 4 f becondly, That it was never intimated nor supposed in | Up the argumentof the ucconstitationality of that act. ‘thas the act then passed would at ail disturb cho Mis- | My firet reply is, that Mr. Douglas nor no Southern mae s that vote for this oticus and a: j ended as a compromise. It was acknowledged ax s com. | we reply: meats cm the other side, and in the Bxaatpct yesterday comet them by swal- ann, oe edagsin to Cor grove. For wile the North will contious | pact ot the sethe force ano trent rete eee | WEE? Thasan axprose compact, made tn 122, co | there isan admirable argument, and there have beea | {imines etided wlll the North aS yen om Mon true to the ccmstirniion, aod all of its guarantees aad | the pa ties to it were as muci bound to vaserve its coa- | te certsin territory acquired from Fra wed thisiy | cthere om other days, I bave not come to this | they have sanctioned itfor the South. The North found is, atrongly com! she will also be found trae to herselt ia op- | disiore an parties to a treaty pe ng ga se coher serris ry | question blindfolded; 1 have endeavored to obtain | S™,lavoir in the comromiss of 1850, bar try Bone @ 908 7a se time, whatever Poming alt mesures for the rort-otioa of froe'om and | Voice in the exund-Str, do you cay that asa lawyer | Qoqused from mesic ail the light upon the subject that could. Let us take | 1, swallowed it. (Great appla alla Simon are bonne saat sneer Se iberty where the In va of the country resognise aud guar | thai Congress bad power’ to make that compact? (11a PE ane clghih only of 860.600, and shad agnin oe antes them. Iam happy in being able to state ia this | merse uproar. Crie: of or. er.) by the numter i : and [ read there among them to each grandohild, to be redi connection, that I know of some law abiding and petri Mr. E.—I will answer the gentisman It was virtaall; ever thought fo, or thinks so now. The committee who then as to each gran: juced by the dee- Otic Representatives from slayeholding States that intend | « compact—though capree may rot have the duty of ae mane Tak the mrovialtn ta ee sone ary (bill of | reported that amendment did not think so, desause they ‘Nisclog) seebeaah tnee we ebee ins Conary inten = Voting agaicst this outrage of plihted honor. Bat, gen- | makizg compacts. and like ali arrengements =here one | joy cl Virginia, distinctly roaireed ben coBeeccntel ty | did not sey so; and if they could plant themselves on One of shose parte—¥1,000—was limited to the widew ze Uemen io defest the passage of this measure, agaicat | party conerd:s to aucther, and a messuce is accepted be- | principle of che prohibition of slavery north of thi that ground, and if they could go to the North, the . | She remainder to Henry Lynch, her son, in fee; but if he: the —— = me * inistration of ~ mn awe tween them, it is necessarily a compact; and I have yet grees and Sburty minutes, which hee boun tnesrpecases i 10 fg seed Lan bob Ati cibstng the oe that the ne pow Lo aged mother, then to his daughter, Mrs. Soltea, the position of the delegation of oar own Stee. res | to jearn that a compact under auch circumstances is ings | the joint resolution ter anuex mg Texas to tho Unite act roken the constitution, then would stand > the Bolted e flirts of every good citizen throughout the | bincirg thane treaty made by a ,ower specifically ast- | Pasted in 1845; and that tor these reasons tho proposed re on s firm ends strong ground. But they did not say #0, peng * Lig pe bo We hea agnosie af Jeng'h and breadth of she coan ry, without dis:inotion of | ing for such anexd. (immense applause ) The voice in | of ‘he Missousi -cipr mise, in order to extend slavery OvOF | because they did not thivk #0, Now, let us see the prac. to 0 to oO ‘thern terrissry, from which it is now excluded chloroform to keep him asleep. (Great applause. riy If, however, ibe elegstion ia Congress from our | thi ¢, amié much confusion, interrapted Cries of of tical character of the argument I observed a question party @ ie ¢ crowe, amié much o «i 2 o ompact eo far frow be ena pur by a gonth in tt { ihe i the lion slept sonodly, and saldambers, anal wil, own Siate—thirty three io number—couild, ss I think | orer) F orice +aa ceded by Spain. The question ae to 08s of 1800, would b: e 4 power sleeping, they should, rire above all party considerations, and pre- Fa arose with respeot to er oll Kee ctuaiieabos to°| vetoentnenan inte and iu tont, ‘ag for general dis’ | right, which my iriend Juage hams, T think did not try ped, of the'Usion sett than ie r sent for once—and I believe it would be the first timseea | the Union, In 1846 the joint resolutions for the annexe, | cussion the merite and dsmeri: rary; sncial, polideal, | hear. I think it was this: ‘Has not Congress a right to | Sais forever. But 1 say to the South, you cre playing united vote agaivet this messare, it would, beyond all | vou of Texas were passed. I do not mean to advert co in tenfold intensity tho very aaita- | repeal a ee! legislation it may evrr bave warning and low and re Feascnable doubt, cefeat it, That there ta adispesition | the excited fvelings which prevailed on that tepic at | Hon that the fr ove Com romive measures professed: | mp dep? I will answer it Toere are two | With sdgrd tocle, and, ine voloe of = = 5g i i 3 om the part of most of cur delegation to vous in accord: | that time. c. Rerolved, thas whatever other results might follow the | kites of legislation; and one is in the nature | Shih [May at long, ard Wot tt ae forte the pineal ance with the feelings of their constituents I verily be- Here the :praker cited the resolution commencing:— | repeal «{ the Missouri Compromise, it would imovitabiy im- | Of @ geneal law, to govern all men as the | to the south—if compromises can be tified with, what Keve, and nothing will tend core to the accomplishment | “New States: f convenient siz,” &o. Pair the confidence of thi J and honor | rule of thelr conduct. There is another legisation. | becomes of the compromine of 1860? (Load and long Of this result than the course you have so wisely taken. | 1 must beg you to bear in mind the third section of | of the Suuth; shat it would destroy ali ith in the pormanea- | im the vature of m contract which is bin.iog on os that are easily to be m promises havin, bear applause.) If they are trifi erg, and tue untecialy Weaken our Mavional | MAD bncing on their bovor, blading on thelr conseieace, | brcken, whet beocmes ofall the compromises of the con. stitatien—what becomes of the compromise of 1800? on tho Logislature of this | 0D the Missouri compromise, sotass matter of g-neral (Renewed spplause.) It is a Representatives in » | legisiation, but asa matter of solemn compact between and fl ch manner ss they shail | the North and the South. (Applause) I concede to | upon this subject Southern aecirer iuarter, to repeal, | that gentlemen that, in the general principle, he is cor- | > politicians triffing with your principles and w Go om, then, gentlemen in your praiseworthy aud patrl- | these resoluticns, and you rill bierve that they contain | °Y of pas or Otic Iabora of love of country, fidelity to its constitution, | this prohibition—pet only providing for the maxing of and all of the ccmpacts under {: treating those who dif’ | new States, ct exceeding fourin pur ber, but it aleo oa- fer with you with xiudness, but with afirmuess and fixed | teins the express prohibition against Reaagt purpose that eanset be mistaken or mivunder | ner:h o” 86 80, whioa fs the Missouri ‘sapking you for your kicd invitation, sui re- | In 1860 the famous compromise measures cams u>, which | deem m te, ADE upon cur Son! }, to resist urfiicehine: 0%, all abtem pla, fr : - abrogste, “r render inope: d rectly or » D8 ts - Ee bere, I rema‘n, very truly, your obedient servant was wilh reference to the a@mtasion of California with | 5 bill by Ccngress, to recur teat compaee trem vidlation by | Same. Power Which makes legislation inthe nature of & | South $e yolticiass pra ecebiag wo initio bern RUSSELL Sauk ber free constiiution, She took the matter in her own vito. ant ean break that contract any more than they trap They are casting forth a bait by which to catch ‘The Tabernacle was now well filled. bands—retaer tregalarly, perbsps, like meny other f these resolutions eae car a treaty, (Applause) Congress, a8 & gene- | their votes; apd let them see that the bait te not poison, ral rule, can repes! all matters of general law; I toll the Bouth we are theltfrleada; we do sot thivetee. ntarives of the State of | but my epinion as a lowyer, is, that Congrons caan.t aad Ropronan : . tell ‘hem beware—and then if the Emmet, who will address you. pitted withont It It was the will of Galifvemia, and | thea verior of enh Sinks crete Unies, thane jbodlon, to repeal any | matter of tion in the natare | Sur'volce, we bave dove our duty, We will bere ee o Hon. Ronxer Famer was then introduced, and ad ‘ressed | everything ceemed to bend to it. The second was for Utah. | dent oi the United states. contract, either between man sod msn, oy Congress by to murrow’s mail, w tev Gelieae et fellows. The thiro for the tercilory and goverument «f New Mexi Mr. Exomr coutioned—I might have said one thing | 3t® ¢ and State, or section of one country with » section tence if mney tobe an louse thak tae aemcatoacioc ot co. The four bythe disputed boundary of Texas. Fifth,tae | wore: I wight bave referred co he adunission of slavery | Of nother. Applause.) I mow, str, sooede to that | jevo is upcmetitutionsl, Ma. Pasapast anp Fetiow Cinizexs—When I say toatl | measure with reepeot to the Diatrist of Columbia. Sixth,and | {gre thi: tetrivory But we are uot here te argue thia, | #¢ptieman that be may be right {do ‘not prstend to be feel sincere regret that the task, or rather ths duty, of | lsat, the Fogitive Slave law. It will be observed that ome | Thin is ota quevtion of faction between sboliliogtats and | ‘fellble. It may be that Congress to- sorrow may opening this meetiog—not to expleia the objects of it, | refers to Uiah—« ne to Mexico. I: is importan: 10 | thoee in favor of slavery--it Is not» question betwen | Oreak whet taey Save made. What then? Let us see . things Gove by Osliforms. (Laughter) At an early ing officer « The Cuare.—I will now introduce to you Judge Rovert | Wie, Cecides not to bave slavery; and ahe was ad fore aud to the Senators ja orach of onr 8 Mlarried, Saturday, Jam. 28, T.J. Souourr, tom dealer, to Mie tl J. Brooklyn. because there you are fully acquainted with, an they ne remewber that these aoqaired by a treaty with be ad Ii fan * the practical nature of this nullification. Conoede, there | [p4<; here I am oi like ‘Th ‘Jan. 19, the Rev. Patrick McKenna, at already been explajrad by uc worihy Presideat—but t@ | Mexico. They did not ome under the territorial pratt | Spdvot ite biiguuions uprn the contrastiog. partion, 7 | f0F8 thet the South and the Nocth, if you pleave, or any | nuch ter before T will support. ff ane Bbetltzainer y | Ot domes Church, Lataane, Mesamsn; ar wamronapiine Prec inject in some measnre in its coteil—while! | dition ar did the Louisiane territory. The privc pler of mich’, Idesd, show yeu the ffec'n of slave Jabor, and | tber sections of the country, by their votes délere my party broken into ten thousand fragmeas, | Mise Faances Kererum Caughter of Mariue Extephe, fq., 1 reg et that tois cvty bas f= | beg | the biil which bas deem offered by Senator Voagins, s# it | prove to you that while Vuio ana New York are going | ‘2 PaTchment that the Miteour! compromise stends no said we are free soil—we are all for free sll No | of Plainfield, N ill give mee .ditfor speaking with honesty, stmoer- | ix said sre to supersede the principles of lagtuls. ahead Virginia is yoiog back. i couk show you that | Mere What then? It is -hie: The compromise was be en ee slavery north of the line prescribed b; ity, and truth. Iam aware of my own imperfections and whioh are to or et of blnve labor is : . | mace thirty three years ago, and uncer that oom lew, [say #0 now. I bave not come here th isability to perform, worth'ly, a duty of this ii 1 | could suyersede those prinoyples? It can ve wothiog but vahovaunuaaes But, ta conclerion, Tekall cain it, | the freemen of tbe North allowed that large Siate of Mis: | Wa. 8 fn cminn T have seen that some sf to da; have not Dec in the [habit of being present | this—that inasmuch as :wo of these earures related, | the words of ore of out greatest and’ mort dietiogwigned | FOU, worth of 26 30, to be received into the Unien with at Publio meetings, acd I have had exceed | one to Utah and ore to New Mextoo, to be regulated by | statcnmen, ‘Wherever the lebor of m country is per | “Avery smong her institutions. In consideration of that ingly little time or opportunity to care aay | themslies, and no provision was made on the subject, | formed by slayer, Inbor dishonors the hands of freemen,” | S€mission, aud ss ® compromise between us, we watural defects. I will endeavor, as well as I possibly | that thereiore that principle, with respect to adopting " ¢ sf wade ® contract that for ever, so long as the een, to perform the duty whica has bewn assigned toms. | prokihitory measures, 1# a general one, which ts te apply The speroh of Mr, Emmet aud the readiog of the reso | sun should shine north of 86 90, all the Louisiane terri- tion of 1850, What are the prinsip! Sunday morning J.» 49, sudéenly, of spoplexy, sey that+I sm the tool of free soilers | Tuomas M, O: Weavertown, near West Hoboxea,N.J., abolitionists, If I am «@ tool, I am then | aged 60 years. Tis telents ané exyuntotencne are respectfally invited to attend bis from his late reeldence, thia = chants of New York 0 tools, bat afiernoon, at t Hu ait * T hold ia my hand & Congress oopy of the bi'l iatrodaced | Lereafter to all territcries to be admitted, and toll terri- | lutious occupied an hour apd a quarter, and he took his | tery should never be received wiih slavery. (Applanse } ond Sedepemdonce, ‘This 4 land tt apnea borteos interment t Be Five Corners, N 7 biaphobeseshaad by Senator Douglas for the purpose of organ zing @ large | tories, whethe acquired from Mexico or any Other sours, | seat amid considerable applause Now, I appeal to the chivalry of the Jouth—it is aere I | ang reason together, and as Congrers decides, let n8 sub Sanday morning, Jon. 20, -anvm Duseuss, aged TO Yerritory obtaized by tresty from France—sod bnown as | previously, or atthat time, It is tine that Ja the oom The Ox. Waldo & ; stand, ang Teall up n the spiriva of the Patrick Henrys, | rit. Now, my frlenca, 1 am not far sighted—I do not years, the Tearitory of Louislans--into two teiritorias, to be | promise weusuree of 1860 the territories were bo adoy: | The Ovens renew et T will introdess, te.you Ochs arti betas cert cattoen at hone pr pill to se into futurity—but I think I oem look | _ The friends of the famtiy, and thos of his sons, Joba, cal enna obras fore I go into apsr- | such course as they saw ft. That ie of prohid:. | James rard, Exq., who will address you. spirite of the South; now upon the: * bat will be f illiam K., James. soa deory W, tioular examinaticn of this bill, and the measure | ting or uot probibliing slavery was ccalined ant tateate! le pg dp tedie rae pe opi la Be uoral from his tat so. ited to attend his fnueral from his late residenos, No. 101 Hester sireet, on Wednseday mosning, st tea o'aloeh, mane stom of Congress will ot pass by without having a voice | without further ‘invitation. tter of law, and so it will be “ ort the Monday morning, Jao. 30, Epwim, youngest child of ance ‘the United, Shataeipt see ores Mticians will take a bint, and withdrew the amend- | Jobu and Sabra W Niles, aged 1 year sad 9 months, great applanse. He spoke as follows:— reach that tribunal. But let it be that Mr. Moaroe sna | ™ent®- (Loud applause.) Let us fre off our gan ‘The friepeés of the family are invited to attend the fe- to- Yi to morro: ing, at 100% Wi It ln the beauty of our free tnatitations that men of all | bis eabinet, composed of men from both the North and tbe | wifiny D&T suenal cor tattle, but that we, are apos ir and Sa eee ee strips—they will floatfalways proadly over ua does Sanday, Jan. 29, Thomas Vaw Bronan, aged 32 years, pot lay in the power of all the polltiolans in the land to | son of Prier B Van Beurea, Ueocesed, break our Union asancer. It isnot im the natare of the | The friends cf the famty are invited to ettend the fe aD ‘A gentleman oame forward anc handed the Chair a re- | tBelt boror to carry out the sompromise even if they 6m | gm not alarmed—-let us all argue and reason together; reference to it, which is cow before Congress, 1 | to be confined to those two teriitoriee, The object of this |! break it im the law. (Applause) That is my appeal. q Sy go beck and endeavor to detail as well as 1 osm | bul sem ite ‘an vuage it, that we must yoy be | slotion, which he said be desired to have offered daring | My opinion is that the Mis-ourl compromise stance as | wn nn a. esd 2 By Longe cause we conceded ro much to Uteh and New Mexico the evening | re uch move so than this on country upem the subject of exciuuiag or | violate the Misscuri compact. We must go back and un Gmnanp avery lato the. Gifleront Serrivecias an. | risks the Misno Micah tik ap Lian as Mr, Garazp then came forward and was recsived with with » riow of showing what the compromise was | did in the case of Utah and New Mexico. That is p: ia and to speak about the cause of our meeting to | cisely the measure. With regsrd to the b night. After providing in the usual way for the neces. | Texas, Mr. Emmet etted a portion of the act passe! | par:ier, of all political complexions, can meet on nea- | South, were allwrong; let it be shat for thirty-three years measures of the organisation of the?Tecritory of | & ptember 19, 1860, and ceid:—Now, yor will recoliec’ | tralground whenever any event may occur that threat- | the whole nation has erred, at all events the Sou:h have Binoe my time is limited, I will confine | that I have read the third section, which contains this stability of our Union. (Applanze ) Emphati | got their part of the myself to that territory—it goes on to provide that{the rohibition It wasnot a part of that compromise which jas it been so with the city of New York: and it is } call upon it to execute mong ihemeel break | eral, thir afternoon, a: Yelock, from his mother's sation and ail the laws of the United States shall | it is gow attempted to violate The third clanes of the set forth ip your first resolution that the Em Pact todo, they say pe pean tare “a in a hear, hear) Lat a go to | sesivence, 11s Greeawi-b avenue have the same force and effect im the raid territory of | second rection in perfectly elesr with respect to the pro ell that regards the Union and ita preserva’ out in your favor, though it bas been in ours ;” that # | the South ard say Woloeas tea brothers, bejat. Donot Seturaey, Jo. 28, AUBmT SrKeL son of Pierse V, and ion. The werds with reference to “other States or | has ever been conservative. If you carry your minds | the practical argument. (Applanse.) Gentlsmen, the i Z Bor th an Bot neard thet s Southern t. wise”? are ol cast away your ‘or, abd thea the thirsty ome stare | Ktzabeth Du Flon, aged 4 years and # montha Nobraska, ‘the sigh th section of the act which was fepeniat v7 we Meeilaticn of 1850, commonly caliet , What could it refer to ualess to | back to 1860—it was then when danger threatened the not say so. I have ya hine il times Suncay, Jan. 29, Mra. Ax Dore, widow of the late " measures. You are ‘sll awaro that the prenibition of ‘slavery’ In that section {t was | South from the principlas of the eompromise | man will say a man from a free State has auld 80. | [xrcne prightand glorious eustelletion {tent apalacee’s | Those boy etaaoe: tetra | Trai im epticn of ibe great men of this countiy—th+ | agreed, as pert of established by Corgrees—you will recollect t it | When J hear the Southern States esy so. then willl bow The (nam The question is r@# on the resaln Hin friends and scquaintances of the family are respect test men bat the eoustry has ever produced—the | was prok uid be dene in coatraven'ion | vas in the city of New York, at Castle Garden, | my head in moriidoation for my country. (Applause.) | yon who are in faver of the resolations will say ‘ aye.”? | fully invited 10 sttend her funeral, from ar ( .. tro late men of the Revolution, from efi parts of ihe coun iry— to ite plain import nid that the compromise of | thatthe Grat gunwas fied. (Appians®) Oa shat oo | I want to bear that principle proclaimed irom some other | There were afew Daya, and several volses cried “ted. | curser of Prinee aud El sabech oom this ten ~ a 5 by process of | me and by gredasl meaca to bring abou | 19¢0 i at war with that of 1820. Tuisvery provision | easton it waa tbat men of ail parries met to- | lips iba those of a Western politician. I waet tose s joer,” and the meeting then (half-past tec) dissolved. | ten o’ciock. — shall I ase the w the abolition of slavery in this | to break that prohibition of slavery waa offered oy | gether to do full and ample jartioe to the | Southern m Congress—sna ‘here are brave, and good, i fvacay evening, Jan 99, Raxnaap MONALLY, « netiveot Y couniry. (Hinres and spplause ) What mean is that | \ir. Mason, of Virginis—a Southern man. woe, thers, | Sou’h:and I bet the booor of firiag off, ax it were, that | and shivalrove spiri's among the Southern men—I want to TELEGRAPRIC the Parish aud County of Monaghan, Ireland, aged 28. slavery wae ‘o be Fo hemaed in, and such measures and | { re, fellow citizens, that the attempt now made to eff ct | firstgun (Laughter acd bi: ) Lhave ever claimed | ree thore spirits rive up im Congress, and proclaim that . 4 wil at prohibitions placed upen its extension, Ret it would dis- | the prsenge of this Mil, orgarising these new territories, | the merit of it; and to the last ay of ay life, imendon- | ‘ter the North for thirty-three yrarv bad given them | MEATING AT CLEVRLAMD AGAINST THR NeDRasma | {iis foneval will take. place thls atterngom, at three im time without viclent means, or producing any | wich this elaure repudiwting the M voring to enforce the sets of the compromins of 1850, [do | their part of the compromise that they will hesitate to BILL, Bonth Second ai Third streets, Willeaabarg, Ll. % acverbity Of fe ling. Tt waa futemded that it should die | mise, is but @ shallow presence I but justios to the South and I (rust over shall do jastice | give us onre, I think they will never do it. (Ap Curvmanp Jaa. 30, 1856. Dublin Nation and ham Standard plesse copy. natural death. (Langh‘er and hisses.) That was the | son. ' It ix impossible to point outany substaatialgrouad | to it, (Applause) When I was asked to address this | plaure.) Tnerefore it isthat I come here as the advo. | Om Satordsy pight the National Hall was crowded by Bunéay evening, , afters Youg eed patetel Jon purpose of (ha meno ebo formed our glorious oonstis on which it would be rigut or proper to disregard the | meeting to right—‘o give my sentiments on this ques | cate of ihe South, and to turn aside the Hbel thst would | our citizens, to protest against Dougias’s Nebraska bili. ones Fi ‘of ‘nged) 8 Hom. I need not refer to the apevohan that were mace at | shin ccmpach of 1890. “This vou brought forward by | tiou=i'teck tre to tedect. “I waater trrawiereiced ahe | be put upon thers. Tcome here as thelr representative, | Speceben were, mace by, Movers. fl. Griawolte t. C. in o harege hbuows, 2’ native: of Lowes, phat early day—epeeches made by the leadiog mon of the | Mi. Donglas Senator D, took an active part in thatcom- | subject. Iam no politician; (am an active man neither | to fay that they never will dishanor theraselvos by tating | Vanghen, Senator Foote, J: Brians, ke. 4 remonatranoe | "Tt rrjende amd thous of the faunily ee respostfaliy me Bouthers States, Mem from the South—suoh mea as | promie of 1850. When he returned to his native State | in one party, mor have I an hostility against sao | the grovnd of unoors itationality. They may ot {8 to be sent to Washington. Vited to attend bis funeral, from bi late resideass. 47 Vimekney and Randolph. who were the shising lights in | he met with strong opposition. The Common Counsil of | ther. I, therefore, with all the calmness of a jadge, and | grounds and we come: they may argue on the fact —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—— Dominick street, to morrow aftersoou, at two o/sinak, the public view at that. tms— all of thai, with | Chicsgodincunced the ocurse which they sopposed he | with the avalytic eye of my pretension, mariectoed to | tue compromice of 1880 di) supersede that of 1320 eunonl Sadie one unasimons voles, declared that slavery wa: | tcok in faror of rlavery. He edied leave to be heard, | my books in orcer to uncerstand the subject, took up | i#sfsir, deoatenble, manly ground, and there we will Hows teem Valpareiee, _ Jen, 60, Mra Carmamnak Wwe wite of an evil, and that it by Hest ought to oe abo | end promived if the people woull give him s hearing, | andj have act jupen the pee of old | meet them har or he gh tongue, and pen to We bave rece:ved Our files of papers from Valparaiso | Robert " ‘ Mahed, provided done with a proper | that be woul! enceavorto jsstity himself. Hadid speak, | Davia Crockett, “de sure that | was right, and then go | pen. The South sbi have a free ‘and fair | to the 16h alt. The friends of the family, and those of her brother, observance of the acquired rights of thore parsons whe | end with bis accustomed abi ity. 1 say this to show | abead’’ (Applause) | told the committee that if I jay, ard as Copgress aghall having Political news prerenta no feature of iuterest whatever. | witiam § Wilhelm, are invited to atteod the faaerdl, iB. In 1784 aaine the Jeffer | you wha’ opinices the mses entertained im reference to | spcke, cy porition should be most cleatly defined, and | heard both rides, a0 let it be. But remember | The wheat crop in tht north of Ohilt was seid to pro- | (um aftersoum, at ome o'clok, from her late rexiawase, nee territory that | Zbvervirg the ocmprocleen of the corstitation. Ia that | the eame seutiments that I uiterel at Castle in | now that the argument is on the unconstitutionality | mise but poorly; but st the routh, owing to the uousual | (y Cumute a reat Fer mires by contre tone traiake, ona | baliore rpecch Mr. Dongiss rays that ‘Congress, after a pro- | 1850 wherein I maintsived ail the rights of the South, I | of the law—-a0 argument which is like the | breadth sown. and the favorable reason there, the crop | monday, Jan. 90, Wi.114M, on'y som of Hana and Maria from ‘* York and Vamashasetts, known | tracted reasion of ten months, succeeded ia passing a | weuld here ia the Tabernacle repeat and cundrm with | esty of » peclar, of tre especial ploncing of a pettyfog- | would be more then abundant enough to make p for the the rgb ror 1 month and 24 days. rv) west Territ Toe United States soquired | system of measures which ought to be satisfactory to the | all the power that I was master of, Sir, | come mot here | girg attorney (Laughter and applause ) phe Urea ge one Begone . “Hine (rods sequainiances of the family are re that cession, ani that proviso acd the subsequent or peo The Scuth hes not triumphed over ihe North, | ssthe at ot app aetiins of our country—I come here |, if they take that ground, the common hhonora- Without some untoward scetdent, (t was generally npectfally invited te attend his faseral, to morrow after- Ginance of 2:87, which rar pause by the old ers, | or the North over the South. Beek hee proverved its tb ena ot mpbatically [ come here to sight a¢ | di¢ entiment of all mankind will rise against them. In beleved thet the whole orop of Chill would be greatet | .con si one © sivck, from No. 99 James s'est, without Teference to the future destiny of the nd of t! uth——to bid them take care of those * i 4 Territory. By rote _ Large quantities of sliver are to have been Wondey, Jan. 30, Mra Lrxon, wife of Andrew Lynem, rence to this taken trom the stiver mines of and Tres nt Bey Oi, ey of ge, better: north. Soi even! am. 29. at 11 0’ TLuAM The government had ordered a commission to tespest | siccut mca vl Thomas naa Elion Hotlnns one Sim: (vhs are sescmng nosy temeuees es, tae. coast of ————— oa ‘Urging them po reaewed dilgenes in preserving the ¥ 4a The Saip News will be tound on the fifth: