The New York Herald Newspaper, January 25, 1852, Page 1

THE NEW YORK HERALD. —— —. * -_—————. - —---————— —— 5 "WHOLE NO. 1030. SUNDAY MORNING, JANUARY 25, 1852. PRICE TWO CENTS. — = ey , 1 ? think about , ‘The Chief Justice sald the course was quite plain. wife ogainst the husband, aud there is only a alngla ole- THE FORREST DIVORCE CASE. | sfcientiy questioned He was most perfeatly ques- Busipesch, spd all be leble ee a ee unis know: | Br. Ven Buren sald, that no doust the counsel coald | cumstence for ioquitys bot here for Gaoenee eodies orto procere from bits 2 direct doula! of the charges ledge ofthe crue cf Mie, Forest fiend hat berdes | underetand that aftr ibe lenath of time conrumed by | manner in which thy matter a yromnted adh pay Rr the frelon oper put iba in every vay in which vee pays not cera canton; os might pare ieee oan: pes pel A Berey belo ft beatied, Fes aeree chores peer we {bis ctence. hom. the least » ; ot be al id 70" both Cece ok tae Ee a | Sees etgeee aina cee teee | Seater ee meee fee | nL ater Fmeiaeeenrunre cu harebe’ | geen is nane ONY mntay nln | fa en dnp oar none Part of the Plaintiff. es, Kemtensed, Che ee 7k te tne Gone Howard, tales the iy charge, and Bougherty ‘snd Flowers on the stand with far more proat | ‘The Chief Justice said it waa not necessary for counsel | tery. the law will leave them whore it fiads thom, branch of Rents case ‘would outweigh a thousand of such grees to pay six months’ board for the child. paid | tothe defendent; and I submit to you, gentlemen, that | to make apy observation on that. Neither party is entitled to @ divoron as not the ‘three mont format! Mr. Van Buren.—Another point is, that Mr. O’Conor | other—the law er granta divorces to gality peoy THE JUDGE’S CHARGE. fob epee pcre eyed papery brn 9 oe aio peepee tay ee eee Pe Prep eer states that Mr. Forrest's visite to Mrs. Ingerecil’s house | Mr. Forrest puta In bio siiegation for the purproc'et me, testimony of aDy DaLLre Hot this period the most tact, | complete end te all pretence of having that act of ex- | the manner in which it waa connected with their em: | were continued for fouryears and a half. Airs, Ingersoll | ting up the ehinrge of adultery as a ream, that oven Mf The Jury Stillin Deliberation. srate reletions aubsisted between Mrs Cornelia Grinnell | treme oharity on the part of Mrs. Forrest and Miss Bin- | ployer, aud with another individual connected with that | stated, and he mentioned it, an some of the jurors be bas been gulily of adultery, ehe Is not entitled to « atroc! th ti ts in | not have paid attention to that fact, thatshe was inthose | verdict. aa she failed in theeame thing, If Mra. Forrent ee ane Loree cusriad om after theoe | part of tw Forrast! Whea Annealed on hes Forrest | vicw, mot only amps this, witness as utterly une | Roureefobr yearn and abalf, and ween couneel under: | rhenld ruceeed in nuslaicing her allectioun wesios her made “ sixpence, or , worthy of credit, as a member of a confederacy engaged | took to state that Mr. Forrest was visiting there for four | hushand, she would be entitled to ask for a divorce, and Sesnes inter deoies Onktes: Charen aAA, hese: mee. flat a re au. ee sae care be feeee eer mcs be’ | fntive boss alatsonest plore, hut arasnpe the wholecavewith | pears and a haf, there was no testimony spproaching tt an allowance of imony. Gentlemen, this ease in a THARINE W. FORREST VB. EDWIN FORAKST, onstal 4 I may | tele us to be sure, that when she said to Mrs Forrest that | the character which you Sind impressed on it throughout. » Va ren) before 1 is au zs aK E 2 iar one ‘Teepe pe i 2 SOTHANIPY HIRTY-SECOND. DAY. sien treatin which avoeimtnive Loner & that rare, | e:mccld tell Mr; Forrest, how Capt. Howard hed treat- | Shere s another matter which ‘must. be coveide cn | UD, bad arked the ccuneel to olte an authority that pol | yolves the trial of nevaral diatiact causes of action. he alone to a suspicious honse was evidence to authorize the him with adultery on several diff-rent occasions, conviction of the party of adultery. No authority nwt {ferent persons—bis allegation chergen her with been given him at the outeet; but he was afterwards re edultery witheix differcnt Individuals, each of them tn ferred to 2d Hogzurd’s Consistory Reports, 4 i viving the necessity of inquiry, You. gentlemen, wite astical Rev. (Keads it.) What be (Mr, Van Buren) | the most perfect apd most exemplary patience have Jan, 24.—The Court was this morning crowded at an woman, You havo per- | €4 ber, Airs, Forrest enid, ‘Oh, don't.” Now, Mrs. Forrest | somewhat different topic, but whioh Is atronyiy ill early hour and the pes'ages leading from the park to | Cq>g And epee SF The stand, but you may | Was ‘re vife ofm wealthy husband, and, of course, had | tive of this case, and then you will have terin'nstrit the was so thronged that it was with <iiftoulty | have judied her by her constaut and daily attendauce | pin wongy, yet she gave her nothing to silenceker. Bho, | much of your labors as consists in the investixceti> , those whose duty called them thera could guin access. | gt this piace, Here in presented the entire andabsolute | Anna, mot Mir, Forrest in the etreot, and he didn’t tell | this cffoir. The counsel has stated thar the oo Mrs. Forrest. Mrs.N.P. Willis. Miss Virgin's Sluclait, | conviction of the innoosnce of her husband and of the | bim, as rhe says he turned her off. Claiming thatthe | defence for partiescharged with offences isto #iy th warned id was that there was no care where an individusl | paid wp attention to this ears whieh will enable you . Richards, bout adi zen other ladies wore ia . it be oredit- | evidence of Anna Flowers does not offer a shadow of pre- | ® conspiracy was formed against them, and he med |, Se “ Aap aad ae pele a Be ‘ae rede vill eae) . bes Deters eno sioak Ma wuseear, was alee Pritt tiymeapecci serie ae ped tence for the charge of a conspiracy aguinet her (Anua), | you, inadysnce, tuat I would probabl ox. | Roing alone to a ho we: fe thas Recipe tee fun | cee me Hide pi evade tgnony — early at bis post aitended by bis friends ing on ber character, which have been exhibited before | I leave that branch of the case. 1 have cailed your ate | ittence of a very wicked conspiracy. Now td» not orise @ conviction, 8 coun. ony! vate resul «not meses which depends upon a mi- reat surpected his wife from May 48 toJanuccy 4). | nute examination of the the testimony, but on the when be fouxd the letter, What he (Mr. Van jucen) | credibility ore bad said, wae, that it was two weoks after Me Bootes. ehowld, for in ~ | found her in that position with Jainivson, in Uincinnati, | proo's are union thut the letter was banded to her by him. Whater Himony of Avie b 1 to bo relied om. the proof are oLUS) CONOR’S ARGUMENT onception which | tention to the intrinsic falsehoods of her testimony. I | meanto assert anyeuch thing [ have not sown an Aiced tan Grn ain @iloatererucbs aterecmulee, ltteer ae anseeT es it de credited: that | will vow call your attention to tho other couteadictions evidence of (his conspiracy, or of what the law Up Of the evidence adduced on tie par of the plaintil. | after boing warned by anonymous letters, after secingthe | init. On key cross examination she adimitted tat Cae Sean mh on ae eee Pong cad Hie sald :--f am pereusded, gentlemen, that your patiense | testimony of Garvin and Underwood pabiished, and after | bed stolen some property, but then she eiterward WT" Mitsui tresicin? ae eb ce ieoseaa the thie must bave been affected by the great lengib of time | heermg everything which has transpired, that sho comes | that she wasbut the ianocont reoviver. When (put the noe toe aa Akane ae Was that occurred that disocncerted Br forrest ti Ma | ggnieet Mre, Forrest agdoctledly guilty of adultery. AM eccupied in thir case nnd L wan particulary aotortunscs | into Court, day by day, and expresses herssif happy | qveetion she took along time ty consider, and pave me, | Of werking rome unjust damage te weother fede pe pepe tha meaeta cal eran mang Ube pepe etm cp trmmar sg Ok Spl eles 9! in cecupying your attention on evidence of an inxtgn'- | to appear in m ccurt of justice, as s ima. | irom time to timo, deadly looks; and was so icug before | do wot think that ® conspiracy. in vhst sense, exis Piomacl, 1S ad Cwoyecks. aster: chat! chat t yo) ge pinch Ema: Ge Ghamaetae eke ticki cotk ie eer fleant character (Mr O'Couor referred to Mr. Willy’ | tual “ohampion of herrelf aud Mra. Forrast, ir the eplled thas’ the eoust was obliged to tell bat Bin one, or CREE alates, | Uidoubtedy more than one | ended Tustion asked Me. Van Barn to.nolihtn | Heved ao. sestopehio dante maalit be lat Ge meee PO o" Horrest, Mu % * a i i 1 Oo abawer, an phe ans al ohe did, oN 81 uns ee j ee 4 > ' “ “ pes 2 * 3 other. vo an a ures io ai So eet ie races nce weid earn waueledluve ttt tke tna ys Sue | che added abe was the innocent recviver. Why dtd ens | this cure, it ie most apparent there hag besa bat | the evidence, for hisimprestion was that it wasother- | charges are nuroaily supp nrtad. against. both partiaa, sid to nooonnt forall this aking pince on the auppost- | when abe lay on a nick bed, effering as women in ach | forget the nunio of the doctor with whom she ied? | exe piivetpal and but cue employers for Taccamies | Wee a te dantttons of Mfr 8, B. | egeeinhy, Marine, m umention cf orvalbity of the tion of the entire tanccence azu eutire honor on the pats | conditions riffer, her traitor lord was employet in | Becauro rhe know cust if she admicted ibebe ould by | through the whole of this caso » similarity im the get | | Mr Pe do, Ss tonababe to\ you: eartalns rolas be wisn et Mrs. Verret. New, if all that ig alleged inignt | drawing into her house the wifs of a neighbor, to fhe | contradicted in slithe ead. Sho waa not able to ra- | jue up end the fabrieation of tertimony, whic ahowmit | Smitm state, to! sou: ee be whieh ra have happenod,even between the parties whom they | dulge in lasciviousners, and in the violation of her honor, | Member the name of Do Lee; che wasabletoremem- | ali te be the work of one raster fast cottavin tune the lettes tee peedths Re hee ie | Hate rsteypet le mention, can it be anti pated that anyching improp-t | andin destroying his own morality? Gentlemen, I pro- | ber that che #as the incocent receiver of atolea goo. this core ® forgery—a counterf: aba wane toitiieanaiin Gus thar ahe Mins tule na mchibe ‘aie ahince “ee whatever, took place? The apparent resting of the ara | tent to you the tostimony of Mrs. Willis upon tha, | with which ehe war detectsd at the moment; and wha hod ’ ee ee ee B) “4 y Mores, jou oneee te Chen aaaeerutin, eae aoe on the sboulder might Fave been # resting of the vem | head, and in the whole course of action presented to | €0 Kood @ memory that eho was able to rewember ‘av A we a eh aa adh pansy tenon ot Pee trey the depositions of | Mra Fortret’s quill, which is to be proved; audit the | somewhere wed upon rcmetbing else. mot fur from the | yon; and T further ask if it be vorsiole that the moral }, the otter FAD ts oon Whe Alka SepelTB ALIA BIGAAMAD | UPC Une ee eons Gasateetiocions aes wottaced | Mz Sulth, and eald the ergument put tatemy mouth | tertimony leaves Ie in revernable, gouke yen cee te pevsen. a is state of tbe ease malght be wapp ead. avin proof of the Inmook ace ot Ms. OA oon Le re Heer a rate oh alah dkeraatirtas rectus home te bumrell, Now Linvbe attention ton tew prow | ty that Mx, Forrast euspeoted hin wite from that tine tid | whether the thet contained in the charges ave proved. Ue He ean oe: te SRD ARE gre, Ue Lome ba ecrrAabe ds BY Any: Beg ta.-8 comet, at Jpabioat |” Reus ol emameol ted Teavittes stout the teatiniany le this r | he found tbe letter That is notao Lwould ark the | Tn ite next piace, refer exes must be had to the Renerad crerything.snd dota not excinde: the tnferenos ofen. | At estublishen the sbiolute eonvistion of plive. 6 we tofiud bi’ | pore of ecmy Fae ter | Court torwstract the jury how far they were to regacd | nature of the cee, ard to some accompanying oroum hae neeenee; for wall POU ae SB J oe yt ange ‘ane Pes ey teatvatitnn acai ta wriiten by Jom m Sivolair, in May, | theee parts of Mra, Forrest's afiidavit which we have uot | erences It fa a moat extraocdinory caw, Here are SEE MaRS I forge rc one vce eal Ere er ne DRE ARERR | 2840. wid your Eran ine | ceansisenaen meaner a to the charaster of | two porters living together up to, certatn petiod, tm aworn that he never rested bis arm ageiost nome- | trating you will see that there ie not @ saodow of | ard the doctor erms xx he was about to id | John Vi S08 hoodie pyaest ddan oF Meir a NE arigeet night bo we exiraat i thelhckinsrtie’ ceent olan thing. Hut. gentlawen. a circamatance should wot | jround to eeovse him; and alleg-d evidence reaning | £0 deliver a eure of Teniuien ja Boston T asked | 363¢. Neither ef thew Letters was weittem by de, | Kinted (lat in no evidente to. that ef. Y SF silks Watt: aibameaboae | be overlovked in relation to that testimony-— | uly in respect to (he particular imputation of Mrs For- | her i she rememered Livag wiih a Mir. Joha Diskiusoa | korrest, bur. under the evideuce Mr Korcent is reapon- | 180s Agsin: Auna Flowers has not enla that | spalust each other ora to be taken aa proved, it comune the great facilities of obeervation in the family, which | rest, upon which I sballcomment. And now withregard | and bhe eutd sbe did nut She comombered chat mole for both of thea They were wri ten by his pa rhe paid ail herexpenacabere She said ebe came on at | thnt both of these Be Ebinia: anterion to! the sing, he sppeare to bave hed in reeprot to the preal. | to Captain Howard. Bot before going to this part of the | sent to the boarding-soberi, sssbe called the Bouse of | Ceulac friends. end written with bia approval and | (1° Tht Sor ny busband, andthat Mr. Forrest peld her | (ica ween ware abandoned maurer—Mr Kor ses of Mr Forrest, and the grest facilities in respsct | evicence, I thick it not improper thal I should say afew | Refuge She remesubered that sue was eherged with this | content. end beth of the most deadly end perni- expenees. She has not enid thot she waa afraid to sloop | quenting houres of a certein derecinion kage ne to the particular ‘rocm—-the library; yet it seems | words in relation to one witners—the original witness in | thelt; yet she dio tut recolicet rigoing au iadentttre 39 | €e0s influence on his oure, Dow presented to you for As to brs Underwood, the connsel states that | Caroline Ingerecll travelling wboot, th tos Gite that mone of them ever saw the sister of Mra, Forres, | this matter—whore testimony iinpeanher uo person | Mr Dickinson, thongh sho lived wita big tome time. | concideration. Lminedistcly atver the ioiter was written | tone Ae t conveyed the ida Chat Mrs. Perrest bad | wemab.apbarentiy wat ovcm taking the caine tr oret who whenever Mr Forrest was absent, was there with | in partioulur, but may be said to overlie this whole | and atexnerds perariee fo) Could cf bel ccna thy aaa | ee eee apeiron ier of eae ree ‘A reference to it will show thut Me, arrest bad | cesl thele tetoroourees while mee Pocvest ieee iwaleee Mrs. Forrest; apd when Mr Forrest was absent, Mrs, For- cane—1 mina Pus Hekimony of: Daman Viaaerwonay || Mantes So rune mite mer geen ace Uamet Co aoe fo that he ie Juss aa much charpoabie with thy | Muke.np hone before, and theze i no Adew conrayed | of adulterous eennerticn wich vatiow pacront Aud form’ yeu that not only did. they never eee ths slstor of | » nioule moment to” the relations betwenn Mra, For, | ceal the fact of living with Mr. Dicbioson,” ot New Sit ie Hee seen he CCIE | neaGabe. | the ocunsel sary that { unieripck: toipiire | Cans eter tan Hoe nate ee eee ee Mrs. Forrest, but that they never had any oocasion to | rest and Mra. Underwood, and ask you whether | naan—rhort sightedly conceiving that ws could wot a he came to make his affiday’ LI turred Barney MoCabe out ot my office, whilst he | Now. ie it not thereforen mostextraordinary once, whew [é see the plaintiff; at the same time, whilst there ie fall | there are not circumstances in the cage which throw aa | track bim. What were her motives, and what was her , ; pu tue mation Of Mit.) Rueceab in'\/t -e canon) shoesved Miikasi Ele baa SAS HAGE EA | ater pubject to observation npd scrutiny? Thies what testimony chat thess two nisters were oonstantly thera, | entire discredit upon her evidence, She tails you that | testimony, but downright perjary ? Aud wuenw jacy | the Penreyivaria Leg sinture ewears that thie Ivteor | (ME O's dercouk to Metamora without the dress, | you are called upon to try. We have found here, arm notwithstanding, evidence bus been given of theitenjry- | she never had any quurtel or difficulty with Mra Forrest, | find that a witness uaa eworn absolutely fates ia | vine orilten and eat without the convent or kuowlalge | [ERED uiccttork 6 play Meiminore withous, the dreaa, temen, during this ¢risl, that there bas been orested ing the cvening in compavy with gentlemen. Now, | cf uny dercription, in ber life, She tells you that she | Ove partic Hie maria, oC tha law: 1 tHae He: Ot Mx Mote And: lenree! yon bare 8 tHe dacke: mAtil | Ee memelva charsater eda toe, chiA Had, 6uMoWGAe || cece te rite eee en cree Mrs. Voorbies, without adverting to the evidence onngece needy.wod destitute, Abetelin youthat abehad | if not eatitied to be credited in waythiag thas | by cther means it was established ws a fact tant M Sokbepeaeik, Wiha good tesaulnation Rew at LORRUADIE:| ablie: atenosninteks me coeline nda erin nee bearing on the question wheher it is reputable or | cal ulated upon epending the residue of her lifeintha | be bas ewo to in @ court of jartiow—" Fuisus | Forrest at least bud reea a y of it, New, Teall at ‘ Peltectd wately eny that {hi ue not made I! ort dere ma tn len effegia. tt aa nandahe kad beater not. was a young and attractive lady, it will ba | hiusebold of Mc. Forrest, at tat time (January, 1849); | i his”) false fa one theag, d of offensive observetion towards hia. Te was | administintion of the lawa ‘To this roe rose hi . admitted young. and recently married t> a young | thatthe bonreheld was about to de given up; and tuat | false in wli—isa maxim of the law. 1 do got believe ore entirely urjuet and zfor Mr. U'Vouor to | great degree contributed, by epreading all the dotatla ba man; and if the slander that is uttered agniast | eho then said to Mca Forrert—* What shall do? You | there isthat man in this Court who coud 9 to that | AW Shy Parallel between him and myse create Lida thar peli, ie hed ne yb pote dp her Be true, thet she and ber husband anticipated | willbe taken care of; but what shall Lan?” Mrs Forrest, | tend and not, either trom mirconception or Hume Ov ter 1d to Mr, Willis, the fact that there was ons present | every tavern or bar-roonn, barier'sehtpeceeey enh we & public ceremony in regard to ber marriage, by anim- | not exactly knowing what her own movements might | cavre be lish]? coerr, But when wa come Coa motive rtecd in un intimate porihou to him, is utiicieat | fact, where newspaper citeulete, tbls matte hue Beem proper act between them,--if that be true,even that cir- | be, did not give her any answer, and she deter. | tor couceslmeat, wo seo the ater distegard co che solem. 7 Y she oo have kaiew woredibility of the witnesea If you » believe the testimony of Doty, the 'y exeinst Mr Forrest. If the tea or, Was perfectly “op foe did not kao # Chie 6 for the purpore of bulp fention to Che (etimony furaiched by Mr. Forney at | Of public rpeahing. t the (ime this suit wus commenced and you will remem- tbat Mr. Forney gave eucn testimony—that tt was with the grestest difloulty we got that letter in, as the Jour ned ccuusel Cppored 1 Intrednetion siroagly, on the grounds that Mr Keruey did not preve that tt was tow aoikee Mitn with the cousert aod aptroval of Me. Forrest, | Teases why f did not preas hii closely made # cubjeot of cmstant trial People have taken cumstunce would conduce to contirm the evidence of a | mired to go to Mr Forrest; she went to him--a | bity of an cath, end upon that oath ove a dodac | wrhon © 7 er a ‘4 Me O'Goaor eotd that none of this could surely be | sides upon it, and ly ed thei inte tl pereon who thus tock o freedom in the Ubrary | bumble supplicant aud eaye: “Ihave looked uson bav- | Of & man’s property Ahonid be allowed to daocad, | How did he sweer om that subject? It waa true ho wa! rive i! lhe Adda ag Uae oh aad (eg Wong obliged to enewer the direct question—was it written | C utd ction, Tavecunsel says that Anon | jt w-uld be singular indeed, if you, who have beew with the apjrovalef Mr Forrest? Aod be replies toit | Hewett admite that Mr Forrest paid ber expenses, No | obliged to live in the midat of thia dironssion, for thirty exectly in the very eawe manner as Mr Lewson | OCubtehs cid admitit; butmy argument is, vint she | deye, were not in some degree affected by it, Well, you with a Isoy, by placing his hand upon her porson. | irga bore here for life; allow me ta goto Fonthill, and | mnch les the wl that is dear to an individual, With regard to the evidence of Mr N. PB Willis, what | uke charge of your houre for your benetit, and without Teaoa tan) igoepertagerlcehing hase orrilieg are bh heer dh eubject, ts) my opiaion alfecting the credit of i Pb iar tab lida : prick i heregarded beonuoe it is the testimony of « party de. | cistey.” T stall not linen to yrurengiteation, "You | rener, but the credit of tbe whole ofthe “iemesios | tad tent walbiul the prerious Kawiedge of Me TEL Ay oy wonscvio) ald bw umdoratood | fremeent mn, <tPetduey om one ido cr the oter, that hiring toexcuipate himself. although he has not set | have been a tole bearer; you have carried tales out of the | fer the deendent Lanean that most vilsuous traas | Fotrest. vod without bis sesing it Them yom discover | A duior (¥ Megsa D Muniatiin) sald he understond | J bave ever before withe that the evil. weleeincets forth the dogmas:of hie genteel morality, He seems to | house.”” Mr. Forrest, gentlemen. hase religious regard | action which orourrrd on cr about the 16th of Suge, | easchy the identity of the sweating of these two | Tire \aeetolt 19 say that olen Mr Foret wa: intowa | tbe ber. Let me here ray, that the evil whiok mus ind have thrown out the idea that x msn of honor who | fur tho truth sometimes. and he gan mo farvaer answer, | 79:0. epdim eich Mr Forrest Mr bougherty, ome, friends iu riference te cts Idontically alike, | be Plated her liouae once or t \ ae {ulb obaERGHEE lag veg. great. ONG, aod taoee (olURloneae does commit a dis oaorable cc’ by invading the Acnor | she then teiie you that Mrs Forr/atsatd to her: “Astong | bray eite whom wokews to us, and tlic Auma nw of eeaummplishieg pra ME O'Go2 OF Uid not pay pact cular eiteution tothat | the public meals, I chhope the Leglalature of this Beate of bie neighbor--by viclatiny the chastity of his wife— | ne L haven here. I will reeotve and austain you; remain | iowers, were partivigniors Now, what ghotip icipor by untae a of tke evidenoe, but he thought abe swore to ones | willsegerd lt ag thale duty to paares set orobititinn the has a biter principle of houor than thet enjoia- | wib me.” Now. then this in the woman who stared | Accoiding 10 the tertimony of Anew Kloweis, with | et eaets! a m-uth.andee thet was suffictent tor him, he cation of tials of ‘hs kimd ull they arefally tried apa ed by say laws of Heaven or earth, end which | ibst rhe baa known Mre Dorvest. from her in. | (be edditiomsl evidence of Ellen Lewlcds, a youug armor ee ardor nucle: besa! cain Geciied by tbe oousts, feban siwayne tendonse te would lvad him to commit a perjury and excuse himswif | fercy.and was acquainted with ber parents. aat who | gitl who was a t in the hose in Marcer surest, three other (Mr. erie) remecked that ehe said once or ate, und often doer creat im roe all ov: af from shame in courequence (f that act. There may be | wea under otligatious to her, und behaved thas to one | We fird that this women was becaght fem Now togetien, | Me Bort ck, wLenin town, and that tho vieita would | community, fayoiable or unfavorable to either of th something in that argument; but if there be, there is | who war alrays prominent in miwistering to thedis. | Oreaus. sud bad been examined here aga it wae | VF ie Sven Ape Bio wees, rd ether. on nth 4 ee involved. As e peo’ of eie end exanse tae hare very little ia it We bave not been able to persuade | trenveof others, Mrr. Underwood attached hers-if to | evppesed dint ber testimony did pot substantiate tha | that ehe woud bear cf something to her « ae by iiierron ' Seek: Seuleel Yok, CORMENES SotcC ee re ne Captain Howord to bandon his bu-iness. and come upoo | the fertunts oi Mre Forrest; she remaived with her, aad | critvival charges against firs Rorrest After that | ea! st Ube chen of that pypec; and sgein ha adver uations Oakley: ini Gentionen of the | Uhl Cot corre tee | the etand It Mr. Forrest has bren eucoeesfutin keep- | inthe absence of the husband of Mre Longstrest, «he | \esuaony wan given, with the povity and consens through He asrocistes and (cs ¢ Iinot tke peloegtorcbats thintewiceon | Cities cenie meee oe ing awsy Jamieson, be has not advanced bis testimony | yompinid until she married out of the bouse. Mra. | of Mr Forrest, wao told her“himselt got to go ty Sit hore OF Steen rest to this most daagecot POUGUE BD It lle Sie TIEBG bake Re Src Stoaea? ce aupenuarlos on dies ppechation Siem |. Foret aside an sxgument of this description. Chere io | Forrest. aticr Airs, U.'s matriaga, allowed her aon | teevth street, sud ree Mrs Korest, ao arremge ane wae rtory of the house in Murcer stvout mn gecrect fo I es very pininly bee me" Ba- | ary yotuted oF enuntie remark has teen made by the ttle in that argument. if there were some fouadation | io resin and in some degies @ charge on the | mede through Mr. Douutierty, (hat a piaos atronit be | (hus! yuu t tt auvet cannot be Leace apetruiiihe heweicecoman the leainaedacdge, to call socket ce ee aoe for the dogma that morality of that kind existe among | bovnty cf Mrs Vorrest, and she remainnd attached | fcund where ap iaterview might be hat with “es Foc | fo enyhody. Ty the eaue formate y cue In teint terete Widnaee Th, reletion edt ee some mew, ws much by the word a wan uttersas by his | co ber untii be fell into the bands of Me Lawson, | Tet. and that a person should eacort hee to it Now, sand @odiag something to jeaplasteniligohae € he the Giat place, tetas’ aoe Lite ei eae whole presence The whole tenor and scope of hisevi- | who at tha! time. was engaged tn facilitating. as far as | What is the place which js found for the pucpora! A Bbage crap peat aera de gpy Len cd PPAR ma eta a rlelai ht adler Mia elas foe tote te Kind! of toetimony. whist dence tbow the direction of his speech when in the | le could. the chtsinment of adivorce: ani, from tha, | house im Mexcer street, which they ray mt c endeavered to dew i apeck (0 Fe tilbl. OF eased of divteen Ab thuconet: | ie ecm mee eying tine irene stend A comparison of what he sera aud what he does— | reried, she beonm un instrument of deatraction to the | respectable because the Rey Mr Cox rea ro amindelys tp Redeniite, . Wonand Sistormeni || aioe uf lav addreve: ecuneet Tor the Guiicdenb nage nao | (Hello ie tea eae ee eee 2 ro miniater te ’ on find Stereusnnt | % «addres CCU he ; ¥ ! A. { amt made nae | better in eome cases than positive root, Positive proof, of hisscts ond movements—with the acts, and move- | jnireris of Sire Forrest, and withdrew her acquaintungn | Well now. the vame of Cox is pretty numerous ; aud : ee ‘ which t by i ae Sina | ment, end soyings of others, is the means by which wa | trom her. end heron from her bouss, Now gentlemen | ¥Lo tte Rey. Mr Cox ix vedo not know, but it a Itey, ! Be eT a OY Pr Ba elerbaar eep tnt Kaede genirnrynenag DET Rees give By a Bttsst Wittens 1s eu srely eeeimnes are enebird Co ascertain the trath of his testimony; and | nilcw we to cail your attention to another fact stated by | MF Cox Gid aeside therm, it ia very a tr niske cut tbat I tried to Pastdacsca Ghd tree, | amagi: coy tra chivex womas, R4OEMeg ob RIMINI OC Gen otee T UIRS te mittee cee ce ee one near Dame A therein, geot.omen, ites the peculiar excelience of the | thislady. &he says that about that time, Mr Forreat | thet iliwue a rerpecteble howe—cr. Guivs andyae y, they put in eviderse that he re b teoin tik pide daee-or so? Gh ec vb Mie Mee gp ‘ pe! detection seems eee . Aig heat nidpipoh aborts! tasks cohen IU oan ie, fuviting hiau to wome com | Putise in thie case, Tne quite satified that the coun: | early than by ov ve the guilt of Fel vid not iy y and the advantage of having the withess | called upon her, aud that he then told her that, durin: + op the wa Now, gentlemen, Mr. Willie has been | the ast three months that Mrs. Porrest avd himse 1 Produced before you, aod ‘ogainet Mr. Willie there certaivly was spparent, from the onteet of ‘ 5 —bul ther Hee ond that be would Lear of some hing to hia nd to ure the words he did nse, in that party by circ piintew a! Se ORLY many HO Fen ieee eevarends aol ve. Youcen thus trace the very pad handwriting | sure. becnuse ic would be a very gress iwpropristy, and | «msn foray chat a paety ztly poironed hin mind agatust hor Tfne did no | who, like Kev. C. & Lester, don’t kaow what a mininier | {itcvgh those nefarious projects, up to chat of striving | UM have beom known by the counsel tobe beyond the | time Now. that is culled positive evidence, and this caso, what might berealled & very, “dead eet” y 80, the statement was an inference on thepart ofth | of the gorpel means, You have no certain kao sledge, | te iueuce Mre Forrest tom place whwre the deepest sas | Ieeitimate line of bisduty. Lunderstand thst there | it io extremely diffevit for ® man to and againet all the frleuds ard acquaintances of Mr. | witners; endif be did, wasthestatroentteasoa ntepart | genthmen, of the character of this house, though | Fclon micht be made to attach to her, by the perform. | Hark vee intended to intimate n belief ou bis part coat | tvuleet. ‘The. evidence in tbis™ come with eee snd Mrs Willis. for no other reason out to remove them | ‘he leerned connsel then proceeded to examine into | #m kot impuguing it, I am not prepared to throw | Hnce ole little drama in the Mercer sizvet house, where | the Court bad an unfavorable impremion with respect | or two exer ptions. te circumstantial ‘The teati- from the ride of Mra Forrest; and they have assailed | the probabity of this part of the evidence, at som» | auptbing eguinet at But, gentiemea, I atat | min witzrsnes would be conewal.d, who, by their testi | t the ese ct his cliect, and that tho remark was | toeny ef Duty with respect to the wet of adultery be- every human being who was shown to have any connec- | length, aud then proceeded to read the following ex- | to yeu the fwets im evidence. ab Fiowers bicny, Would cast odium on Min Forrest. Now, in poe gba the _purpore of instructing the jary of | twren Mr Forrestand Miss Clitton, and the testimony tion with the tumily, whatever, uniess.it be Frank Voor. | tract from Mrs Underwood's deposition :— Sey Pet ald Aa rn po aes peo nal ee Sd cbt ae in centre gk pps | re gh de Habel saith gla peecoremite phar nacre Tole de eal tna Lua bie, and. perhaps, two gentlemen connected with the | Eometime in tee course of the month of November, 1849, T | mece urrangeaseuts to bire a bedroom in Ube thir stury, | T next onli atreution to Gnthverable impression, if it wee isid Usfeee them band Cpptals loward, 3) believed, would leerone public prow---namely, Mr. Parke Godwin and Mr. Bryant | ¥# in Hrs. Forrest's bedroom, and Mrs forrest wan'in det. | in the trar patt of thie house. She weut checs | prot to the mot of emsiarien. & etn Progrem ot SOHN Grit 1) he mind of anybody im relation to the =-whom it would not be very convenient fora man to | 2* v2" about twelve c’clock at night, when allots atdden | pnd devoted one whole dey, with the nesistanse of tate | / case which he thinks celis for it, bas undeubtediy # rT tarty There are three tests with regard attack who was anxious to have the publis prese on his | Mr. Voor giame fa. and with her Profesor Usakley, oC | men Devgherty, who brought her there. to ths puspnse | Focus: wud next 0 the ket proximate to criminality, | Mihi to ay to the jury, in plainer terma than the. | Hog Of evidence—firat, the probsbility of rice, | Dir Willis was the fist person to whom Mr. For- | sud Mr. Hackley nmsined in tho entey. Cwontunty vet | of (rg Mra Forcctt ‘There wors in this room two | Iatermed iu the litrury. and proved by Mr Deming azd | 0: ubtel in thineave baa vised, that the Court hasan im- | ihe fact sworn to; scoond, the gennral chstacter of the reat, in January, 1860, had received any evidence of sus | und Profever Hnckiay went into Sie, Forrente batenom, | lede-at leat there were two windows giving iicht to | the ladies, who were oa'led in to-cociorm him; and thicd | Dretrion wzeicat ore of the ‘partion, aod that 4¢ ts ths | wituees—aud third. evidence euutaiuing eontectiotione picion of wny mirconduct on his part; tor, remember | rnd Ning aed talking for s tong time. Pro- | the recm—one of there Mrs Fiowers, by some mwvans, | in this grcup. J eail atiention to the evidence of Aona | duty Cf Jury to dieregard this impression, and to Cetion te the probubility of testimony, the Judge that, from the Ist of January, 1860, Mr. Forresthas av | feseor Hecklcy had been in the habit of comiag to thehouss | prepared by hervelf, aurea to be curtained—probably | Flewers in zerpect to another ant of criainaiity tes'itiea | 1 M their own ov nviotions ant views of the terti- | suid, that evidence eurrounded by tinprobabla cireum » salted him. -fren that time to the present he has made | {% £)4\(Mth sirees, in the arost familiar [Feigarik | the ove that was mort convenient for the o | toby her—thatof Capt Howard with Mrs Porreat; and | BOY ef the ouse, Tt is imposaihle, gentlemen, for a | tances. should alwaye require strong proof to lead the charges against Mr. Willie. You will remember, at | Mr Forrest cslieds and he war therecha (ileetioy)neniact | jrcte sbe bad in view; I had some idea that provahly | @K you to notice the eimilurity between’ each | bdcr, in procceding on the trial of auch @ caco,ns it | mind tobeleve In it truth. The character of w wite en early stage of this case, what tremendous antisip eecing him, and was lotout ofthe basement ina private way. | It Wikbt be owing to the warmth of the wea'ber thac | ¢f there three cir pees. I want you now to look | 3s impe Leet hy fi ry. and impossible for a bystander, i on the mere epinion or tions we had thrown out. by the learned counsel on the Weil. now, poor Mr. Buckley dropped hom» to his | the curtrins were put ur—one of these windows oom. | st them gronped together imorder that you may ae | te beer the evi othe ease without forming an | bh and should not be considered affested other ride, as to the trials our witnesses would be sub. | houre with that amiable young lady, Margaret Voor | muricated with » enumli dark bedroom, Thess curtains | theteach of there erories comes from the same hand, | Of !nion upon it, ty it must be to; and I pre. | t We w!] kuow. he coutinued, that when @ maa jected to it we allowed the- question to be introduced | hies, and he called, at the request of Mrs Hackley, to | were, at L suid, put up by the agency ot Mes, | aticugh testified to by different peraens, (Vouorel dl ont haviog atthe | i+ sviliv. there grows up, in @ little while, a general ira into the case, whether the exact position of the witness | crquire after Mrs. Forrest, asa pieca of politaness, and | Flowers, ard ake recs to be reasouanly ecoaomt. | then reviewed portions of the testinony of these (hres clove cf ito decidid imprersion as to tue bearing of the Imnivesien ex to Lis conduct, ard’ it is that was to be looked into for the purpose of determining | he went with Mrs. Voorhies (her sister) to her room for | ex); becaure, when Mrs Forrest did not hooor har | ¥itnerses. which eermed to him, even by their vary im- evidences, (div tt the. 6 of any remarks from the | which gives the jury @ proper opportunity of judg- the credibility of that witness You must have heard | the purpose. He was a minister of the gospel. That is | withe visit, ehe tookthem down and carried them | ErChHbiitive to partake of the same general charaster ) | dee. it Spprar that euch sropression does exist, ttisthe | ing hie cheracter aod meng how fur they may that often. “I heard "ic till my eat was tired. IC | the ptory wbioh tbat old women made upagainether | evey” New, ‘centiewen task’ wher was the otmect | Leuttait tis vrouying st taste as ‘an addiveudl oon, | Wey ard friect tight ct hig Jury, fo Ct Cane ls | piace: Sebeces Sno Lee, GLtany,, Rome. Meee fhere is anything that I despise, gentlemen, it | friend and benefactor. whom she had known from her in- | of getting Mix Forrest to thie room? Why was thece no | *ideration, lending strength to particular considerations | “piviors end directions seem Co be iuflurnced tw some howe sparen of Mer Doty, manifestiy frome mere Iss threat Ithapk the man, so far as I am con- | fancy. (Mr. 0'Coxor commented on this, and oontinued:) | much solicitude to get her there? Thin lady, (Mra, | tvebcw that this whole matter, wn presented against | “rater by this impression of the Court; but L rertonal hrowledge they bave had cf bim in some tram: cerned, who strikes first and opposes afterwards. But | “ wre Forrest left Mr, Forrest in the month of May, 1849, | Flewere,) not only writes one, but two Isttersto Mrs, | Mrs Forrest, is not only unfounded in fact, bot that the | Ch fay with great con: * that [ have never sube sactiong. and state that they would not believe him on the theeat we heard, and have heard often—what did the | or thereabouts went travelling four months or there | Forrest, and the most strenuous efforts were made to gt | petty Boe ne conthlevce whatever and had noconfidence, | Mitiedia care toe jury involving any matter of jaterest, oath. It is only, therefore, when a witnes comes before threat mean? Was it mot for the purpose of attacking | abouts, and them she took ‘a hease. No. 102 Sixteenth | her there, and a deep plan of operation was resorted to ibe troch of his charges. I bave thns, gentlemen, | Without distivetly sppiristng then oi this fact;and (now | you. and ehows that be is acquainted wih ea man and Mr. N. P Willis upon his cross-examination, as to his | street, where she now resides”? Good God! says the | for the purpose of inducing her to come there. Here in | Teviewed the various fecte and elrcumatencenof thia | fy 0 5cu, gentlemen, io the mest explicit manmor. that bie general standing in the community, and says he entire morals and obaracter. Fer my own part I cau put | lesrned counerl, there is not a suggestion in the aM@davit | snotice in the morning Hexato of that day. thatif ara, | Core,as far nel waa justified by necessity. probably | Whetever my ovn views may be in zepeet to the effect of | wevld not believe him, that you ars bound to place any no other construction upon it; for see what the witnoss | of this woman that Mra Forrest bad run about the ooun- | Aupa Flowers, of New Orleans, formerly Miss Derapsey, | More fuliy than you thought exactly agreeable, and [ evidence on the ove ride or en the other, yor yourselves credit in the evidence of that witness, us affecting the f was enquired of—bis chastity and morals, Was auy | try and then comes baok, I nu berelt of my nonset 1? | would call or ceed werd wlicre she mighs Le aoe te ts | aball ranke no further observations om farce Thay estab. | are te determine what the effe t to be.according to truth or credibility of the parson agafoat whom he tee fuch question put to Mr. Richard Willis, and was any | that affidavit contains sny other suggestion. Itis not | oftce of Mr, Sedgwick, (Mr Forrest's counsel ) eho | lh mest olearly, in my views and consiqeration, | }CUrOWn covviction. of the fairoperution of the testimony — tifies. Thur it is, that whenever an aitempt is made te euch inquiry addrested to Mr. Raymond?) Wasany such | usual for an uffidavit to contain an argument—although | would hear of something to her advavtaga, Now. that | that Dre. Forrest has et all times oondusted ner- | befcre yeu, broaure the vercict you render ia not mine, Impeach awitners. the counsel of the party against whom inquiry addressed to any other witness ’—or t» any of | the affidavit rotroduced does not contain ao atgument— | xctice was sent to Mra, Forrest, and this was after Aona | ftlf chartely, modestly, and upright!y—(hat she never Pe Jeu are recpensible for it’ It is very dif | he tertifes bas w right to enter into the question aa to all the witnesses who came here to remove theimputation | but I ark you, what other conatraction could. by any | Ficwers hud been at the office of Mr. dedgwick and had | bas been guilty of any censurable impurity what fitantion cf the jary to testimony ing the cheracter of euch witness, by producing others om as fares might be, from themselves—as far as their, | possibility. be put upon it (The learned oounsel re-read | heard of everything to her advantage, which ho was ante | @PO that rie newr has commitied apy act to whi n cesion existe astorhe the stand, ard, by this meanr. show the jury to what ex- own authorities were proofs. Was any such question ad- | the extract. and commented upon its meaning and oon- | toccnmunicate, and after Mr Forrest and Me. Sedgwicg | CCUG attech any worse Dame thar an ast of tneaution, Senos, west thes ia ould {ent they can place reliance uocn what he swears te. Sretsed to aay one previously to the examination of Mr.N. | struction st some length.) He now proceeded totie last | had heardeverything to their advantegs. which Anua | Which is the strongest evidence of » woman's innd T tay to yeu, gentle sod | Then. gentirmen, with respect to contradictions, 1 is P. Willis? Why, Fentlanen, such questions were not | chapter in the bistory of this drama—the ocvasion of | Flowers wes eble to communicare, What was tha | Phe way not have been cautious to sores hi jnotly you mre pot to regard wlvayr impertant to lock at the whole evideace Whem nensy thing for 4 him a certain thing at one lived together In Twenty-second street, Mrs. Forr if pny inferenee addressed to any single one of the whole number. Why | Captain Howard sleeping in the house. He alludadtocir- | object of thet advertieement? It wasa portion of | Jmpulaticn as ia the ease of omitting to deetroy that = S BaaY Grew of the evidence. or any infe | a man ccmes upcn the stand, and says, “I saw atrane- Were such questions addressed to Captain Caloraft? The | cumstanove,toshow the intimacy which existed betwaon | the elaborate preparations which cateed the hanz- | lester: but geotlemen w matron whohasalwayawnjoyed | TeECe yeu ines Craw of my opinions in this care, w actin when bo persen was present, thee is ne learned counsel has told us, with what frankness, gontle- | him and Mr Forrest. ‘There was not the slightest evi. | ing of the curtains It was to be used as a moda | the ene confidence of her husband and every Vagina pede heeded thant hag fkihatll hy t, means cf contradicting bim ; for the party against A core fieqvertiy cccurs . | the part of the Court, to 7 LieD. T leave you to judge, that it was purely accidental, | dence that he elept in the house in Twenty sacond | oF inducing und wheediing Mra, Forrest to visit | (le—who has never beard the b which it beeemes a duty,on Khe and that he stumbled upon Coptain Calcraft’s difioulties | street on the Int September, 1844. There was evidence | thot room, It had of course another and diferent Tespeet to her--in not ex in early life. We were as far concerned as well as he, in | that he had reen ber at the house in Great Jones street, | chject th of ausp be gives thir evidence cannot reply. But fore the jury, inextenvo, if the jury be sati-fed he hes made w false aires tt, statement, be is unwerthy of credence, In thie She knows herrelt to be pure at Mt the evidence {a the ea It justices % connection with something to ; i Big He ike f ‘ the wey and the manner of the accident, when he was putsing through the olty of New York Hs | afler she bad viekted that room, You will reme herds ro suspicion. Whe bare idea ; FTN tO ae He ne, aaeea, | Sate, theretore, gemtlimen, you must apply the test: L Mr. Van Boren dissented, paid @ specific visit to Mra. Forrest, and there was nosus- | gevtlemen, that Anna, on the stand, denied writing her | Suspected never approscher her, nud th 9 do is, He hn al- ead y spoken of, nemoly--the geurral character of Mr. O'Conor—The learned counsel said that the allne | picion ; he treated ber asa la’y occupying @ position of | second let sion to Ceptain Galoraft’s wife was accidental, Taat is | the highest reapectability. and ho might have called @ | ber was ber hand writive; but, on ’ sbyruch thought arising J true; and when Mr Celoraft disclosed the painfuleharae- | second time. Henext proceeded to the testimony of | rbe admitted it the mext dny. Not only did th The eflvct of this entire and perfect puricy ter of the inquiry, but a very email portion of the acci- | Anna Flowers, in relation to this part of tha case; and | address to Mrs Torrest the lecter in tha moraine, bat | Jady 3ou all know, is to divest her of cantte » | and purity of her life F jury the evidence, ji rows jad Wh tor produced rere in the community ; and where yon finde at, treinot circumstances sil lead yeub og tow coriaia result, so contradicted of others? The ert ir € ade im relation to Mr. N. P. Willis. Well, | to New York. she told her bis appearance on tie stead, and he was rigidly | for on explanation, stated that the had boon strictly | for ber by Mr. Pervert, ber bieband, by the a crcesexawined How far were bie private morals mad+ ped by her family not to give evidensa in any a rubject ot inquiry? Why, the learned counsel asks a ex relating to Min Forrest, W | question which he would not have considered # faic one | who was reprerented to have come here out of a pure | of that conieder. vho have bean, sod are, en iit hea been addressed to himeif, and would have found | lows of justtoe, for the parpors of testifying tothe trath, | greed in of chasing her down)—whoss ebont ail imporsibiiity of en it very trooblesome to anewer, probably. (A laugh.) | avd to deetroy the reputation of a lady who had | wicie object is the attainment of that verdict at | Whe is over nice eboay For insta Are you 8 member ef a church?” “OF | bera # friend to her? He contrasted her a your hangs which should bisst and destroy this Indy, | (on't pretend that Mis what ohuroh ? Now, we know what strisé requi- | with thet of her mother, who appeared on ths stand, | Her object she tells you was to deceive bits, Borcest. | tetven, T think I have me fed ia question t to dentr and whea arked | incusing be trap, which had been set He then proeceded bts in iseue t, he took up urro between Mr. For- f as testified to by Doty. He ory to attribute to Doty wilful isstoteuwent; and reviewed that poriion of It ch there won a contradiction of dates in relation to ‘foriminality on board the stenmboat Al- he pieaer ency of this woman, who had come, through her love of j ant at various metanoces in stive, that the woman | from New Orleans (and with the other mombery y. dent bad happened, and the learned counsel deteriained | the jury would recollect how that evidence was obtained, | a recond letter, with an appropriate menace of th te sure, te of eanti mony of Mrs Underwood, that all the rest of the accident stoald happen on pur- | which was by means of an advercsement, stating ,in the | jcet; aud what waa the rex) od) would lexd to o' pt ies, It sting of what Mra. pose==(& laugh)—after be had told you of it by acc'dsat, | cena) way. that upon applying at certain piacs she | honrsily ex in well and tre ' fi teld and wh from others It is but, geptimen, the learved counsel says he coatned | would“ bear of ething io her advantega.” (1 | deceive Mr | 7 Bo dear to heavy: your be reperate that ebe seys from Limrelf to the delinquencies of Mr. Culceafe’s wife, and | slighest reliance bys placed upon her statemen’ | theetjeet cf itese two w | That when a £0, ber own D rhe has obtained that he futended other purposea=to inquire wbout | came bere fr w Osleans ta eonseq | that ebe had not sven the pa sasioun 19 Atb my confersions of Mra. Mrs. Robireen, Do you believe that? Nothing ean | yortircunent; eo Mrs Forrest berove she saw them they wore | 0 res f the vegotintions about @ be clearer (ham that the object of wil there threats | written fer t ceiving Mrs Kor not | fray Bivene © psrmitted to have any ! ¢ of @ partic! ‘vat varloty of other riptions of tims tire satisten- but in titer are enjoined upon parsons before they are admitted | and Jury would percetve the diffsrance in the | Now, why ali thie elaboration? Was it thet Mrs. Anny | ten that Mr. Porrest never had w fault to find wits his (Hage rie ee ee cticns were of such a nature that no to the priviiiger of being a member of achurch =f am | ninvrer in which the evidence had been givea, With | Ficwers merely might have the eatisfaction of telling | Wife Leyond this ttle matter of giving him the lie—that | 88 Produced. Chess SS ee rely upon the tertimony. The Jud; airaid that but a very email proportion of individuals | reference to her etatement. of having tl-pt with Mea, | Mre Forrest that rhe hed come hereand told the truta | Detuned her out of Lis house without the leva: mrepicion | Wie Waterial Forrest, Mr, Fors videxce of Andrew Jackson Allen, Who have the most perfect fait ia Unristianity, of good | Feorest, the facta were that Aron Flowers usuelly | reepeeting ber conduct to ber busbond, and that it was | 1p her part— ¢ commenced proceedings for | tet, cn hie part, puts in an anewer to this com. relnticn to the conrection be had observed to exist be- mm tele acd very good Chrietians, aa far as thelr belief | elepcin an upper story of the hou and general observation are considered fall short of the | rest, amd the letter required. one o @xret requirites (o entitle them to he considered as | to clon of her guilt, and not for the | plaint,ond, after denyi cations. sts Up against tween Mies Viifiop aud Mr. Forrert, at Norfolk, Va, when ber counter char y with six men, naming they were on a thestrical tour of the country. If such newer, denies these charges; Prate of things etopped there, (ha continued) the jury # bofcre you. A good deal of Would have to conskick, could they be reasomabiy ae nto Mes, Roerest, who had | # civ ; at she wiched to foform | Purp of vindicaticg his oharacter—tbat he commenc- pid ever anybody go through | (4 them proceedinge without evidenca—that he pro- | aberate process of lyiug aud deception for | Cured eviderce or desire | over Mrv, Vor | (hrcugh her love and offre ning, a witness | bien siweys to kiud to be execotion of a deed, and nooording!y the told | her of it? Ir that true? members ef the Churoh Mr Willie stands before you, | Anna that rhe must mot sleepy up etaire, but muss | cuch @ © the neoersity for it, even as far as the conftssions of the opposite party are | come cewn and elrep with her. The learnad cou veb ® purpose, and that, too, with the a of | for it, #rore in bis his mind—that he procured it by a ed, 09 to the effect and character of | counted for, consietent with innocence of the parties? concerned—implied confersivns—he stands before yous | sei described the jooslity of the rooms with minute. | ctber seeple for she did not ‘pat that edve: ant in | Upfeix Deans. and sought throughout to make the most oUsocewers it ie said that he denied the alle- diort people would consider that it could; while others man perfectly untainted. Now, ss to his visite to Mes. | ness, acdcontinued. When the servents were all retin the lixeaip? Did anybody go through such process | ©»! ir Use of it—schunning on all occasions, a fair trial made b ‘nf, but rimply denied that ba would bold that it could not, Passing on, then, but kaep- Ferrers, Eis expisine to jou the wanaetOr fastens | Teeth ree ee cote ir inereresuesuned | th ea seals any tody fo eis ussomiiieny (8 the subject in his own country audinherown country | ¥** guilty of tho adaitery charged at the time and ing in mind still the facts testified to, you come toe explains to you the reason of them. ‘Those vise ware | certain facilities for indulging in criminal note; bit | of remo mort infamous plot? And what war thie plot? Ming to try her by « foreign legislature and a foreign | }!oce indicnted In the complaint, leaving it thereby to trenrac'ion whieh, perbepe, is not the next in order of moderate, aid quite reseonable, wad, in the manner, jus- | what opportunity was afforded on (hit ocoasion, when a | Lark the cuttelne te wheer Why war that curtain | court Lconceivs, gentlemen, that I bave made quite be inferred that ke did not monn to deny the broad fact time Here the Jucve rterred to the testimony ot Dr. tilable—owing to the Kind of relation which existed | girl of sixteen was brought down stnirs und slept in the | placed over the datk bed room? L dask, What | eiperent thatthe whole bevy of evidence brought be- | itvelf Tt is necessary you should understand what is Lewkes. dereribing the railroad oars, and Letween the families. And, geutiemen, when £ soms | rocei with Mra Forrest? Mr. O'Conor then referted to | «flice was it to per(orm in the drama? Not to ieep the * you, Jamarked with such ciseumstanses rhowiag ature of pie et Under the code under which wo giving the oplulea uf the wituaed upon the eause of M Lae to thera things, which sre the sabjest of 50 | the alleged violation raid to have been committed on | eon out, certainly. Bot the learned couasel says | 1*brication and « contrivance in getting itup,and as it- | 0? now proceeving. His aliegation on one side, and her — Ciitcn’s illpers en that occusion. This opinion had beem much complaint—of sitting up in the house | Anna Fiowors by Captain Howard, an detailed the re. | it ir utterly imporrthle for you to constler this any | S!/ ehows, to be so intcimsically unworthy of oredit, | treatin cn the other, ore cf no importance at contredioted by the opinion cf other medical witnesses, @ll_ the night—es for the persons who eat up late 16 of her crora-exawination on the’sabject,andexpored | iniquitous scheme cf deception, beoaure, sald he, it oid | that sringle minate’s reflection oan scarcely be re- | The bn! stands, therefore, on these grounds—Mra, For- rnd should have no weight with the jury. But leaving at pight, we find Mr. N. P. Willis was present, when | ber prevarications in regard to this charue. Ho then re- | not succeed, as Sr#. Korrent did not go, end, therefore, | i¥'¢d to enable you to arrive at the conslusion which | Feet charges him with advleery; be denies it, and cliar these coutradictions sride, (wid the Jalge) the fact re bis good tacy was also pferont, and his brother, when | ‘ered to the conduct of Rarnoy Mo Jabe in reference | the matter ameunted to nothing. Aud then he went on to | Will telieve from the ramemfrom the fame of this lady, | hit vith adultery; she deolan it—and tha torms the moinethat there was adegres ol tetimacy existing betweom Chey came to stay ail might. Ther is no pretenos that | to her. and his ultimate diemiseal from service. | recount, apd did recount, that she ought to have gone; | the only thing which, under presant circumstances, aha | isete In this oxce ;' and mo effet isto be given to either them. that may orrtaluly be regarded us extraordinary. Mr. Willis ever committed any acts of eriminality—any | When Mr and Mre Forrest went to Karops tha house | that if she bad gone it would have buen a grent benatic being obitged to tay ehe feels to be n stigma— | Pet"y, on one side or the cthor. ae to the trath or falsity between a ingle Indy aud a married man. In this con- acts of an indelioate or fmmoral nature—any acts to | wan left in the poreension of Mra Marcaret Voorhles, | to her cause Row, let us ece how Mrs, Forrest was to | ‘het name, which rhe will be at liberty to abandon when | Of these charges These are the issues framed by these rection the Judge sivo alluded to the evidence of Mr. galse Inthe mind of any man a prejadice against Me. | and during that thue Anna Flowers did not do that | go--ibe learned conusel thought aud argued cast she | (0 Texder the verdict whioh law and jnatice requires in | Pleadings, Now, the court before whom motions in tho For'er, who testified to having geen Mr Vorrent come Willis It appara to be the fact, that during wort of the | which she afterwarda did--threaten Captain Howard | cught to have gone, and no map is more ingenious or | (bis cate, Mr. O'Gonor addressed some further observa. | case were made, thought proper to direct certain fesues ove of Mies Clir ‘¢h’s rocm One morning, in the Fagie Pinca: constant, attendance a ti eg casey he wat ia | thet the stery mizht get into the papers. and reach the | capable of furnieking the pecpar mode of going—he | {1 "\*WiLh Fespect to tho question of alimony, which ho | sFOwing out of thev» allegations to be {owned for this Hotsl In Albany. Tn chia case there was also the fact simics’ constant attendance at the bed aldo of his bo- | vye of the dcmincering Lord of Fonthill. But she af | rermed to think she ought to hare gone in gomowny with ‘d them to pare on. Mr. Forrest's real estate in have arranged them, geutlemen, somewhat in» testified to, indenendent of the attending olroumstances; loved wife, mir istering to her wants in every sbapo ia hit | terwards mahes this charge, and Mr. Samuel Mareden | a gentlemen, | fetdown by bimeelf at $160 (60, and his persowsl pro- ent order from what they appear on the faoe of the end ifthe jury were to. ask themeelves, cowld this inth mi would she ask? Ob. gaya he she | * ;@ ower, ond inking Gue means to seoure her care ni a “I he matter f ’ ? of okley; but then Pro- | erty i* estimated at $4000 a your, besides the princely | proceedings. The first question is, whether Mr Forrest ioacy exist, yet be reconetleable with the innocence of Piten om, ‘and fleeds foe her tonetie men a4 mond enys, “I'll take the matter im hand, Tit eee it | was ecquainted with Professor Hackley; but then Pr P iy 7 The vieiis of Mx. Forrest to the house of 1 pdfe pon me.”” And he shows hor thavif | fessor Lnckley w with Visiting her improper! verue Which be could derive from's moderate practice | J8 guilty of the adultery charged agelast him; for the , Br, Forre last hour of the night, whenever wakefulaess im- | che sttampts te. mabe soraglaint, thero wee ample evi- | Why. t aay yes yoy beter ony my baokroo Hea this profeesion ; and he (counsel) suggested that at | p.aintifi’s allegation ngninat the defeudant must first ve Garcline Ipgervoll was next spoken of by the Judge. It tived that he could do | dence to put her down; she takes $26, acd goos of to | three pair stairs In Mercer aurvet, the windows covered ot one. third should be apprepriatod for the alimony of | dispored of, and oertein inoidental inquiries with respet | wus sirc {cr the jury to rey, in relation to this matter, 60 wi bout injury to the reporeof het who was the ob- | New Orleans, the money being paid her to put an | with curtains—Mr. Dougherty and somebody elte being +. Forrest. We donotnsk you (he continued) to be | to the rest. The beet way for conaidoration will Lhe a | of which he bad offered no explanation, could he Lai Jeet of his tender solleituue, he indulged in expressions | end to the sbame and scandal of the matter. | concenled os witnoseea—two boda iu the toon, attwo or | 0venced by fnehion, hut by the oonsideration of not | up there quertions in the order I bave vom be m. | done what he is charged with, and be parfectly Innoce of Kindners, and such as wholly becomes a father. Goa. | Nir. Raymond then arks Miss Margaret, bad sho | jnieec'clock inthe day, in an obsoare strect of some. | *JCWiNg A gUllty husband—rs he must be pronogased, | Ibe first question is—Has or has not Edwin Fc rrest nines We now come to the ease against Mrs, Forrest, on his tiemen, let us take the man as he is up to the preset | been corresponding with this jade Auna’ Why. “ ” | whet a rather suspicious characterthough my frieud | (heuld your werdiot be againet him—to give his wife « | his marriage with Cathorine N. Forrert, commicted adul- | ony Muck hs been raid to indionte two things—firat, Hinze, and as he eppesrs upon thy evidence We shall | raid pho: “Then,” aid he, “you compromit your- | suid be intended to vindicate tts reputation, aa he lived | If provision than the law of the land seoares to hor, | t/xy. as is charged in this action? Now, praceens, it 18. Poiteet's pripety les om the eubject of accial rela judge then, not by the rncers of particn, which may be | self, and I'l get them back;” and he does #0, Fro the | there bimeelf—it would have been anything bat agree. | \f instead of plunging into guilt, he had been called to | {s conceded that there perties wore pe - gland ; | tions and moral ciroumstances, indicating « desire om uttered in ® oourt of justion-—nob by the bay age ‘ime Mrs, Forrest went to Europe to the present hour, | bie on thiv trisl, (Mr. O'Conor went on toshowtnhe | thexrave, + thet they came to this country, aud retided here @ num: | her part to disrecaid the ordiuary rates of aociety, and preased his child, and he pe: ments of contemporaries, who woy bs bis rivalvin any | she never exchan ‘a letter with Ai Flowers, an hjections there were to her going there with the othr MR. VAN BUREN’S EXPLANATIONS. ber of years together in apparent harmony and peace ; | giving rite to presi pions that she would be in dangs® lar ocoupation—I'sey gruisuien, I prasent Mr. | never spoke te her a. t, except ia New Orleans, penteines enumerated by couual WE, B. ¥, Yooehion The Court took @ recess for # few minutes. On re- | tat dl aehion axons metwecs the Toda Apter age tary ) | Of felling i) expor d te temptation, Thia rested priaei- lis before you. and cal! upon you to Judge him tn | ne Anon Flowers saya; and of that there inno proof but | xt the time happened to bo in California—Capiaia | aeembling, tomreparation Ont of that bes grown this sult. And this | pally on n certain lotier writt»» by her, whloa expe way. There he siood, & wi ners fa & cours Of | what che awears herve . no ringle | ©) an incladed fn the ohai inet her, Mr. OWonor, in relation to Mr. Van Burep’s question which is put to you, Is the question of (he plain- | genoral views of hers, that might not exactly meet the bg and I fave him, in fuil confidence, | sixpence wa ever para. Re aad oe seoeaeet ap ecrte: | coche wus te ceubee cumavtdtn ver hes neem im | tien to corteet rome of bie (Me O'Uonor's) reatertnrs, | tif, prerentig Mtr Forest bfore this oourt for the par. fens of ony cf us; but whether it contains suything tm to a jury. Now, gentlemen, you hare—the | pondexee took plave during that time, batween Mra. For- © with him; and as to Mr. O'Gonor himself, di said that he underrrood that the counsel hada right to | bere of obtaining from ee The cate ceatiomen, | the care ar to her genersl dis ositios, aud the pr counsel faid not—but I say you have—the testimony of | rst end Anwa-—betweon Mien Margaret Sinciaie and An- se him to eay auyiling on that pont) W! oso noveithetanding his repeated interruptions, but he | !* a pee my pie oe trials with respect to | of berl:fe. for you to oonside”, Tt woul! bea Me Willis mort direot cm aitthese potnia, Lean't oon- | nw-be'woen Mr Ravtond end Aamo Now init parks ject of this interview? Could it have beep wn, Ent to disoura the questions. He can merely | @ivores thers is but oue side cf the question to be looked One matter to I a eae ose shout teeataa nvonaees Ovive what (he oounsel meant by saying chat be was aot | bie that Mev Horvest pays for thls obild, in order to | thing ee (han come Wuexpiajmedsand most adwninadie Olale (Lulche testimony was po end #0, st-—elther the husband proceeds againat the wife, orthe who entertaine ae aetioms oboe: anaes