The New York Herald Newspaper, January 21, 1852, Page 1

THE NEW YORK HERALD. WHOLE NO. 7026. MORNING EDITION-~---WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1852. PRICE TWO CENTS. FORRE! vo ‘ASE, | silowed to be read in evidence, but by showing it to him | other incidental questions azising, in the progress world to laugh at you for doing so."’ Again, when ho | filingof thishis libel, pra: ir honors that a subpoas m: fame ge in which this denin! is couched-—in euch THE ST DIVORCE CASE. | firrcclected that subsequently to this comaunieation | Ofte, ,tueldentat, questions raing, in the ysoxreat | Comastompest inteepoct tober abit ofetiendiag ohurob, | ius tornmmon th nad Catharine Yorrast ve Appeur i | w-denial she abandoned (hell and paid tin east fae RADARS to Mr. O’Cenor, be had another interview with Mrs. For- | oy, and I find, when they come to be submitted to me, | 820 of Jeng whom she goes to preach, plains. Joa great fact inthe case. I now call your attention te CONCLUSION OF THE EVIDENCE. Tost in regard to this subject, and that she thenassentedto | that 1 decm them material, 1 ok | He speaks of the Rev. Dr. wud says :— Perhaps ‘Then the fact whetbor he resided there a year or not, | the only testimony introduced. I think you will agree naeee the divorce. All he recollects in regard to the matter | tions in respect to them, bur, a T vie x gars ire: | 2 be exoused because these letters are hastily | ways fact to which his attention was likely abe eat with me that, not, thatapding the higt pounding manne ERODES hesena that, was, that she desired ‘he allowance should | arg but these three mati wi written to you, and your letters seem to reflect fully the in which the ch: against the Samming up on Part of the Defend 1 inquiries here:—First, was Decause it was necessary to reside there a year before he ee ured to her. On the 9th of February, character of the Doctor.” He speaks also in reapect to made, they are of meat gross, snd I might also theB, with the full Knowledge of all theno fac's, with the | tnit a tegen of tho meee cf Pec aerator this | Giteuding churob, and bearing Dr. Dewey—1 am | could obtain a divorce, Now, in August be repeate this | oP ts mort eourrilous. mature, dnd thet the perform conviction that » divorce was to be obtained in Peno- | has ‘he committed the adultery as charged inthe com, | Tightglad you went to bear the Dootor preach. He 4s | there at that tine. Well! taking that teati- | ance, in the way of temtimony, has been exceedingly syivania, that it was to be obtained by charging her with | piging? ‘Third, has the plaiati@ committed the adultery | Undoubtedly aman of very superior endowments.” &c. | ony, “there war nothing "atone io the ‘case | Feanty. I think 1 may ark you whether thoy have “great indiscretion of conduct not amounting to oriml- | which he charges againat her? And, gontlemen, inthe | This letter was read yreterday by counsel for tho plain | yor question, whetker on the November after this | shown any diepcrition to put any cless of our citizens nality.”” she assented, under the advice of as prudent | Geoision of this mus, and before you do proceed to con. | HM: partially in the hearing of tue jury, but this portion | August he was rerident in Pennaylvenie, How, { ray, | 0 the etard Has there arisen any unwillingness to TWENTY: RIGHTH DAY. and bonert a man as ever gave advice, that she would | pider it Ihepe you will not think that, there t im. | if ecaped attention I give you mere giimosos of | can there be a doubt thet he was euch resident? And 1 | celleven prostituter’ Certainly not. They have been Jan; —-Mr. Forrest was early in uttendance. Mrs. | make mo opposition to this course, provided auatlowance | Propriety om iny part, in acki Print thete Ietters—gilmpses of the testimony which they | canthers be doubt thet he wassuah resident? And t | ore ea" on the stand in profasion. You tecollect the Forrest and Mrs. N. P. Willis were also in Court, but | for her eu properly secured to her. Again,on | Py sari) or you Lon do, of there prerudicns whink bat | furnish in reapest te the charocier and conduct of the | Weritle that he war a reoldent in the Stateot Pens, | Deimes of the various witueares, and that they all swore ‘oft beforeMr. Van Buren commenced his summing up. | the 14th, Br. Bryant writes to us, but we aro not allowed | long to human nature Tatated to-yeu inchs outeot of | cefendant, and in rapect ta hia fesiings throughout this | \yivania ‘at tke time of commencing this suit. ‘The | they knew nothing about Mr. Forrest. They were pat ‘The Chief Justice asked if there was anything to offer | ( produce the letter; but up totbat time. there was no ‘with | *ptite Ome; the Kinanos of his heart and the nnaffected | Lye inquiry ie whether the defondent. in gailty ofthe | UP experimentally, to see what could be obtained fro on the subject of alimony. Gtthoulty, till be begen to remember that there was some | ‘vif Cate, that we were engaged in controvers: love ond admiration, not only to his wife, bat to evecy | f * 4g them. It has not arisen, therefore, from the disposition Mr. O'0omor sald he was confirmed in the opinion he | ther difficulty besides securing the amount ofallowanoe; | S,women. Eatated Cdtately or all nae taal feeling, st | ore contected with’ his houeshold-—aniinala, servants | ther charges anti ls necsioaee, to caltyortatination | togive w color to theen charges? It has not arisen from had a€vensed yesterds bot what that difficulty was does not appear in this | of a3} civilized men, in in favor of the female portion of | Sh4 #il: bis love cf the couatry; his love of the simplest | to the complaint in the case, In calling your attention | “drrire tocall any class of our fellow citizens before y Mr. Van Buren simply objrcted to the introduction of | case. so far an Mr Bryant's testimony is concerved; but A emurrmente which could be imagined Lspeakto you of | 4, ” ou? Nor apy kind of testimony which could command Q on the 15th of Febrosry when the interview took pleoe satin seh sek or CS eaeean Bane fs ert the plearure he expressed ia healing her admired; and 1 ss the plat suite bute woth HE aE hes Hegel an wiicitation of thet rath, or to sustain the case whiok The Chief Justice said it was desirable toavoid the | petween Mr, Sedgwick, Mr. O'Conor, and Mr. Bryant, a provexty-cane bode who las been 60 7 fortwnatsacto bo | Will read @ single extract, giving you the nameof che he ssid plaintiff, iy informed and bolioves | the plaintiff seeks to hold. Now, the vataral inquiry Decessity of going over the proceedings again. This | jetter was written to vs, which we got in the afternoon, placed i that position, knows that there figs peaiadiee evileman of whom he speaks (iteada ® portion of the charges, that eiace the marriage of hor, the | would be, if rhe kad all thisiaformation that she swears matter was formerly referred tos proper officer, and his | sn no one attended on the part of ars, Forrest, neither | ‘the part of courta and juries in behalt of the guntier yreterriog Lo the complimentary manner in which she ineift, with hin, the said Bdwin Forrest, and since | to, at the time she filed the complaint; If she bad informa- decision was under the supervision of the Chancellor. poken of by od Mr. Mackey.) Throu lotwer 7 deod and | tion that the defendant was in the babit of committing Mr. Brysnt, por Mr. O’Conor, This was on the 15th. d a " f of But were now constantly gettieg into difficulty, re and mere dependent tex, which nearly deprives a man ‘ hte ny tho #o~ i Pears of it? they ye zs Y: | On the léth. Dir, O'Conor writes a letter to us or to | of all favor, if not of the justice to which his case entitles Sob cnipor hes, bavecciwac canta ee Ok MArHaKe rhe. Jchiumen comnicted | SFO prostilution--what is become of it? I shail have growing out of this new system = Asthe admission of the | vr Sedgwick. bighly honorable to him, beyond all doubt, ji r hy ap oppertonity of showing the mysteri de in whieh I 5 i $ aier 3 : ‘ 4 Z Niet eh i exe | pperionity of showing the mysterious mode in wi testimony could have no ‘fect oa tho verdict, he would | jayirg that if there 1s the slightest intimation ou | bit, pt gern err deste to tnt a sary | Butea read and’ briefly commented on some ovher lot Ey} ond Om incor atln Od bello’ ste ears (ie eee | they mot sider the teatimeny, the mysterious moae im let itim. the honor of Mrs. Forrest in the measures taken to | who were imbued witb there sentiments—it is one so | ©?) Throughout tuis eutirs correspondence, sprowd ousard eight hundred and forty hidoarnai connes- | which the witnesses who should have been bere are Mr. Whitiey was then recalled fot the fourth timeand. | procure a divorce, she utterly and unqaaltiedly | universal, one in which nlmort all auiuala participace-— | Ove? che length ef time to which Ihave adverted, you | tivm wish, ne Josephine Clifton, | mincing. Witnerera whom we hed reason to expeet ud carnal know! examined by Mr Conor, depored.--I am acquainted | refnees to acquiesce in it- no matter how abundant ri Will find the same kindve: heort, the sume simplicny | 28 hb BEW GOCORED: aso in the olty of | would bave been put on the stund have not boon bro 7 3 habie 3 same 7 ort, Ube y , pul je stone he r ugh. With Me. Forrest; Cave a general knowledge of his real | might’ be the allowance made to het, or how apy | teh ity! not hiahly erediiebls to, man, because it 18 89 | Oy congue the mane adimiration ot his wife, Hue eased ve | No® dork ia which nid Josephine dined ain | before you, What can Mave beooms of all thia eatate. i he provided for ber support, That ‘waa very natural | him butit is just, it ic preyer that il ehould be ao-cit i | Of tM binds of ehople amveements, the ‘seine simp'e | One usrigchurdeos and forty, at noma otaor placs | information which this pleintif! swears to at the time Q —What is the reasonable value of those six houses | conduct on his Fart. Tdo not venture to make any | the protection which beion ge to the weaker and mors | t@*te which choracterize bis entiry life, and vo: a | or placer in thes! y of « York, @pd carnal connec- | she filed the bill? What can have become of tha porot | tion with, and esroal knowledge of, the td Jerophine; aad | injormunte? It is an inference from the fact that or | sho tuat the mid Kd win Forres, tn tho yearons thousand | they gid not p and lots in Twenty-second street? 4 —I should sappose | sungestion that this was not in the highest degree | 4 Gight hundred end forty-one, hed oxtaal ooauection with, roduce such testimony, Chas sie So cle ae eC eee ae comm, that they were word | ere itable tohim; but I desire to imprees on your uainds i 000; 1s ppore the lot oocupted by | that over and over, aud over again, Mrs. Forrest had | taaneny in thie rere bey: eat erulows expreasion of disappotoumeat or of harsh foel- A hundred snd for sraal 00 never had any ‘such information ax eho states om himself to be worth from $15.00 to $20.000; the fair | jutivand unreservedly acqatesced in Mr. V '« applying | ve nim tis cane be Asahi Ae o ee ate an ing Dow gen Iemen ifaman’sletters chus written, and | fitted Rawr etde GE tae, wald Yogephing age hours in | Gath abe bad-—on the grouud of which sho mede Teagonable valuo of the Fonthiii property, would be from | to the Penuaylvanis Lesisiature praying @ divorce, on | fo ita justice, then we ebull expect that. the aizople oie, | be¥e Produced are fair Craneeript of his ouaraccer-—asit | and ale that he, the wild Fuwin Porrooy, in the asme yeat | these chargen nuninet the defendact But, gentlemen, $50,000 to $60,060; I occupied part of Mr. Forrest's Co- | the ground of misconduct, provided that provision was cumatance that the issue is between @ man aud woman, | S¢¢ms (0 me they rhould be— then you have, wicnn « one trousand eight hundred and forty-one, at domo other | let us present the cher.es in reference to which teatl vington property in Ohio; that property has two kinds of « fol t. Now, thi icles . wr ( ic f i nia | Diner OF places in the wuid city of New York, Lad oseualooa- liuded to, and see value; Rabenld mppo Se te ree eed akan ery mad for her support low, the articles of agreement, | «ball not deprive us of a verdict at your hands it is | tXeeption, we stated, a picture of a men as simple in his | Pine: oF Bitecwaeceheatat ay oh te weld ectestion: fe has beer alinded to, and see how far there ts @ Yheath, throughout the whole of bia cosresp y of his famiy—not a compli pendent fex, end ove which we expect to bo . extended to them in this case; but if the tes | centruriety te were embodied by the evidence, stow that tnere : 4 a na slacere in his teelinas, as devoted avd cra ia bie on , 4 nee to KUpport the churges, and [ think that bad bargain if be were to well it for $25,000; Ble. Forrest | Lever was any understanding that a divoren shontd be | Maint lacomecrnod abe: apace Tene se eat ws this Aer, HA ever wae presented im a court Ol jus ahd loo, that the sia Edwin Forveat, ip the gear ono thou: | av yee ii ty aatiaty you. 1 eaonot believe that you owns some lots in the Main street of Cincinnati—some six | <btaimedon any other grounds; and you will tind that | f) s adventage which beton, “ih hes bax. but veel thw | The ouly eingle contrant to thts conourrone twsiimony, | with, aud ceraalkucwledge of, the aad Josephine, ata house | cen be so decieved in regard to effective testimony, oF Seven ote; my Tecollection of it as it is four years | « is only provided that the divorce rhould be obtained | incidertel advantages whicn ate so important in court, | MUR every point and everything, stands tho singe de- | ia we eity of New York in which asia doaephing thea I when it is sought to bold * party reeponsible for the ago since I was there, is very imperfect; 1 should ayy it | + making no uncecesrary charges against ber, and this | st justice she ines No tack of meaua sntice Cheat, | Cldraiion Of Nathaniel P. Walle Sir, Willis mone, or ait | snd slo thas be, (ho said Kdwin Forress, in the eae yoar, | ont eriminal acts Ido not believe that you will be@> is worth fecm $15 0C0 to $20,000 ; I am not acsuainted | j.'the deoument introduced by them, the number of | tepduore ef witmmaen tvaseve Meet of OR Hiss fi humsn Leings. ever hoard or eww any rudeueasonthe | ope thousand eight bundred and forty two, ataome other | deeteyed, in regard to the testimony, as to be wrong im with bis Michigan property, nor with his personal pro- | «hich Ldo not, at this moment, recollect, Mr. Van big OL ae ee reef Mr Forrent to his wite, De sid be could not | Pace or olaces in the gid civy of Now York, had carasicon- | oy ocnciusions, The testimony, in this care, furnishes froma reveral of the other States of the Union, to tet inresprot Lo the moet trivial—the mont ivrignibcant ¢ otien with, ot d osruslknow oot the said Josephine, and bis treatment of | thee thavthoend Rowin Barret’ nthe yourous'thanand | HOgroUEA, wot only to convict the defendant, but it neete hita in the sireet, eicht Lundred anc fory-rhree, had carnal connostion with, does not resemble a grourd of suspicion when we re coincides with Mr Forrest’ own estimate of his property | some mutual friend that he would give uo publicity to | Sy at the corner of diuray or Barclay w’ceet, he apeatain | od cerned knew! ‘he faid Jovephing, atatousein | tleet vpon the entire notoriety of Lia pereon~when we P y distant Btate, contd shed a ray of light apon the matter, | ee cen een emo orhawite Me. Wille ia | cheelty of New Vorb: in which anid Josophing then reflect upon the fact that there fs ov a living man lo Crose-examined—I_ know nothiog about his income | the charges, Ror permit them to be puolished — Thiswas " ne , be bad : ) qj end ‘ nd sold kavia Fe yo namo yon : " from Fonthill Q What was the income of the Uo. | 1: chat wus requited by her, though kuowing very wall | theve wiluessen nud precicing thea on the aeead So, | the cnly haman being who ever heard euch w thing ax | pd Aio,thet sheotid Ruin Forreuh in aboname Year, 008 | the gity or New Vork better kuown than iv the dotends ington property while youltved there? A.—The rent | \ pat the cham e 0 ving y a h i he fi th A . é i barges were which were necessary for the ob- | too, inn t 5 . >. to | this, end is the only human being who ever knew and | ricco or places in the wcid oityef Now Vork,hadosraal | out in ths cuit, and the facilities thus afforded I puid wan my services on the estate; I brought him ta anishe being fally apprised of the manuor in | fe upplica wish counsel, Leable saree core hope stated ruch w fact in coe trst to nis picture oflite which | Lonuection wth, ond ovepal kaowlodge of the oaid toao- | for testimony dn regard to his whereabouts, during the debt to me; 1 left because Mr. Forrest failed co complete | ‘upich the object was to be secured. This negotiation 3 ; there letters afford. He ia the solitary porson, of all the | phine; and eiso, that thosaid Rdwin Forrest, in the yoar | whole course of bis life. I begin with the testimony of perty. Soren reed some extracta from the document, one of : ; urto sce them topather, heesuns hief Jeatice “I would montion thet this testimony | which was, that Mr. Forrest ehould pledge himsclt to | ouinstences, Where one two, orthnee’ mice oon his wife; and when Mr Sorreet his contract; he paid me $500; the contract was ean: lds BEE Seta stan pentane eh t iu | (roseded by none who praction at the bar of our sdus ti n'y o ono thoursrd eight hundyved and corty four. had oarnal con A0H; it ivin refe eati i : ” 5 anportant that you should bear this im | State, or of any ol sate hs others produced on (he stand -uud they certatn!y caa i‘ y h Mrs, Ingorroll; axd it isin reference to her testiaomy selled by mutual agreement: Mr. Forrest commenced | j.jnd.' because it reflects much Light on. portions | netlone Sng dyer ee eng e Bas hat on ott | etlord to bring persour on the stand t very re- | Noting with, and carnal knowledge of tho waid Jorgohing. 8 | that he wan ouce, or twice, or three timer, as the ose legal proceedings agsinst me, aod the contract wascan- | _ ; 4 erywhere, instant. rarnest, gealous ue : 1 a houre mtbe rity of New York, ta which anid Jom re oe eee em teak iaen vt the tertimony. Mr. #., finding that rhe | geaistance trom bin and from rach auxili ashe | mark that the oefendant ms we priest, | then Lived; and sles Lint hs, tho «sid Bdwin Fovrout, mey be, in that house. ‘That, perhaps, is an inefrence celled by mutual agreement; T have not been pretty ac: | withdrew irom negotiation, "and neglected the | jelghedesits ter lin hece Coerefore, with, | BOF Prostiluce, Nor police: heard a word to give | saweyearione thoustaa ol dred aad for:y- fot fought to be drewn against him. And then I shail call tive in this case; 1 wm an Englishoiaa, sdvice. which she once followed. of Mr. Bryant, Ty fortification | OOUIA be: thiewacan ecuntennnce © color tortimony introduced by | scme other piseo or places in tl city of New York your attention to the testimony in regard to Miss (le Mr. Longstreet recalied— Duposed, that as near as | and put herselfon her legal rights, by her counsel, re and with th Labs olen auee Mr. Willis, in Cae conduct of Me, Forteat to his wits, | Genel com ectiom mith, and carnal knowledge of them ion. -theae being{the only two pezsone. so far ag ny pre- he could como at the time he found that the painters | turned to bia residence, ia Philadelphia; returned to the by! it Pit : af all o} 4h eathat heroon | v1, gentlemen, +n authorised todraw the ephive; aud alao, that ho, the bald Bdwin Forrest sent recollection extends, in reference to whether any were at work for nearly throe weeks Alter Birs, Forrest | home at hte tees oa ee ee aaphla: return e m wantef i Trane Pe iuucnce, Ceemamend | nferecce whica T have drawn, that throngh the « nat conncation, with. and carnal kno windgo of she*aid | ‘astimony at all has been adduced, I ushed the counsel went in the bouse in Sixteenth street. family of bis mother and of his sisters, ar 1 | (hisirsue, which ia necessary to estauiish our gudtand | COUrse of Life, Op to the time of saparation, he has thousa cod nnd forty. | ov the other ride, yesterday, to furnish me with any The evidence here closed before the Penusylvania Legislature, as « | heripnocence. She has two gentlemra conoseed with | Utitormly Kind—haa been unitormly constderats—tas ty fiat day ot April, im tho year oae | vuthority he had on’ the snbject, upon a question of MR. VAN REN’S SPERCH. clored, to prosecu'c his application for her im thiy ccurt. ard @ large ruwher of inflaential | D¢R BOL Ormly ateDtive? Kad is, therefore, Eoauding ba pucred ona foriy two, pal oe hese jaw that might arice in thia case, he etated that eect he bad no authorities, except such as were pro at conneatioa | bably quite usual and kuown, I do sot thinic it Jouophine, be: | Becersary to proceed wich wny remarks} but if he should d eight hun. hereafter cite auy authorities requir @ remark, of ptember, pree the Court will grant me the privilege of replying £ Lundved aud fuety tour’ | to them, 1 wish to say this-~that there is a suggestion eee ee tb de | in one of our el tary books, shat ifm married woman fe y ip seen to vivit # bawdy house, Uhet fact is a strong proof ho, the raid Kawi M : ties or time, of: of prostitution—a strong proof of adultery; and also = ft V iran he, the eatd Biwin F carnal kvowled: t day ots rtyefour. ond th ear one thousand Mr. Van Buren, on the part of the defendant, proceeded | cisely in the way be had intended to de tosumup the evidence about}1 o'clock. He said:— | srrangement between the parties That If the court please, gentlemen of the jury, [congratulate | resisted, 60 far as appears, and fuiled, a | wen im ceveral vifferent departments. Sho had men | Pf fore peu as ons verte whom cornected with the pre moonbdoted with ths pub. |- Neamy cause of compising on thas Keds) aud hands Deon lic medes cf transportution—me r J Hebi: LL edasasbe:senSLS oe ih het let madre gou on the clere of the evidence in this very protracted | \urning the case over to the courts. auth» public amusements, city pede teh chines pon Supra Refemtng te t ton of domiou, the It trial, Iem sure that the counsel on the other side will | Whobad lived » year in Penvsylvania, to pros various ramitications of seciety which they pervade, to | ‘1d that Sir Forieotreriged bere before gotag t agree with methat you have manifested the most com. | cou.ts ofthat Slate for a divorce, shortening cha tecm | en)ist wot only the largest influence inher behalf, bucta | ''2Yeate, and in another city turee and tive years Hedid |) Ai 1 or house i mendable patience in Mstening to teetimony.a very large | of residence betore reqnired to prosecute a divorce. The | bring to her support testimony—teatimony hs respect to | Mt lose his reeidenee here by that cireamsiance , woe | Te Sw htch hotel Portion of which might seem to be entirely irrelevant to | instant that applicntion was made,and wh-u Mr For | which it will be my duty > eommunt most freely in | “Cee the fact of my being proved to be present bere,ta | jcdccd or bourded; an the care, but you will remember gentlemen, in respeotto | 1M veturned here, (I ought incidentally to etate, | ihe course of my temarka-showing you that where tracivt the fact of my residence fu the Btaue thirtieth day both aldee, that wereprorent parcics who are deeply inte. | ‘hat when the proceedings were taken before the | fact aeuld taveli ion Oy te q : toresids ‘This weupbatically true. We ctionwith, Aud cayaMl kao wlad, reme1k that the same ipference should by drawn from rested im the question which you were called om to try, | 2 ania Legislature, a ‘commiesion iusued to | ft herbern done; ard showtrg pore T foes thar mere | Nave what ts tiue, Uhe daniel and origin of bra Mr tween tho! iat dev of March in martied man visiting sich a house, Now, | beliove and who are, very naturally. eevsitive not only as to | ibis place to take testimony and evidence of Mrs. | faleehocd wax required, a witness could be procured to | *eireat wes born jo Ebilmselphis, You will remember | fl Cee) Ugke puncrod at @ tinty, aud the, the authorities will be tunad to custaia the peopositio at if @ married womau Viell What is called ia Bog a bowdy bonse--a heuee cf iil: fumv--it furnishes strong ground of adultery which must be repelled by proot; that if & married man, iu company wiih » women, visit sucha house, under each cireumstances ax would authorize a suspicion that he gees thece tor tie purpone what may be precisely in issue, but ransitive as to the | Underwood, Garvin and 50 on,) notice was givon to Mrs sttendant circumstances by which their character hers, |}. and hereaiter, is to stand in the public judgment, and they, therefore, desired that we should present not oaly | there tacts, to call the eae : matters strictly relevant to the cece vm trial, but which | (ther side lo this statement, that if [ min recollect or | utier and alecluce faleity ot W tbe t that after he separ might, even 31 not properly relevant £9 the’ igsue co lw | mit-eiute anything, be may correct me, an 1 should also | to soucae it meet have hen ee the tee nae val Sam@ there and a tedtify to it #0 that Ea could : > | (het be lived there uuinterruptedly Gil the time ot his | 2/5 \ilarhe thes marek of this application, and of the taking of this teatitaony, | jhucent whic the lay providee ioe uber omaha ct arzege, You will roolleet that his nother resided | ne carnal Leno wae derired 10 attend = (L here desire, in atating | (bink I ebnil be able to sniofy you, that, in the progress | ‘Nete for many years, in a teuse belonging to bim—that ere taote, to call tho atieution of the counsel on the | cf the cae,testimony has been adduced to matters, tha |!" “milly was inade up of his mocher and sist ren a trom his wile, in J d=‘ Nee is my home-T have no 3 conagetion with, botween the | tried, throw nome light on the cuse, and afford some ex h to do when be comes to speak in relation tothe tes | en‘thestand Bu ul icipate oie” Phat would necks Lim 4, That was in which she, the suid —— | Of being there with her, that 4 n bus to be ox- planation and vindicatinn, if nee-esary, ot circumsiences | ‘imory. We heve no opportunity to be heard in reply | ray, if 1 at Gulgeomemnnt ry coal » prpronition of law hardy to be disputed 1 ce | then hved, 5 Loiy ot Sew Yor plained) But, gentlemen, the sug.eetion wislen L wish which are wade the subject of present remark, though | ‘0 bit; and in a case of this magnitude. I shoaid notfeet | (cn or this testimovy. There are ether suggestions con- r [he eounel to 1 Kent's © pages nod | tl stiie, the ead dow twaon the said kaa * | tomake in regard to that houre it, in the first place, the being wot properly subjects tor your decision on the fied in permittivg any stat rected with the case that it may wot be improper toreter | 77 OR this question ; the seoond of | ened two dates, hag saad estual | testimony does not tead to show chat the house of Mra. trial, Ido not think you will fiad that this extraordi. | incorreet to go without correc! te. The plaintiff is not apaiive of our country, sho iw Vink Lege! Obsermey. 340, 19 end 1s igs re Ingersoll wan of that description of houses ealled, by eit anan wel of personal Kindness, that if (should ba | «ay Frost vs. Bevin. Now, the care frou tay Le inglish authcrities, “bawdy houses,’ and that, ta the nary testimony is entirely unvecersury. You wiil fiad ; %& € . e " uso towhich euch great controversy has arisen,and that | (ide would coreet me) This notice was given to Mra. | Ovi chcice, io male this her sesidenca. Testimony hea songret evidence of residences =the declaratiogs of id Eawia | sion induced Mr. Vorrest to vieit tue Louse, Usat ho never there ia pot very much of ibe testigony introdnoed | “orrert cf (aking cut tostimony in this city, and shed» | teen introduced to show that ehe endeavored. at all erty Luneelt, off-eting this, are the only evidence |}. | Knowle | gid #0 in company with WODAD, BOE Wat eTuy poem which dees not bear, in some degre, upon the issues oa rned touttend; and the reply read to you on her part. | events, to become a citizen of our own country, and it 1 is iv hte power to tu His sta'rs whace his | ? rty-Sree day of Maron ia tha scar | Mm the company of avy wonwn cither living oc singe trial. reare certain uxco-troveried facts in this | 'a the Pennsylvania Lexislavure, shows you the ground | would be most unkind, mos! unjuat, moat fliiberal. i aay is; be states where io is living; if tbsee atatements | “yy! cit brndsedaedorty-seven: and alas, thas | Oed, When vietting the howtee, except aia, Logersoll, 1 t vom tiace or ime, in the | Tegard to whom there is no charge of ndultery—avout en made durieg the trial, and not pretended Lo impute thas , and yOu beliove then tury arein | rc, evivence upon the queniva ot how the case #tauds in that I think. yeu will be pleased to reflect upon, | (a which she refused ( attend the examipation of these | yr judice should be permitted to exiat against her by | te weer in good £ tend eight bu because. if in the progress of the case you dnd much con. | Witkerses. She eaid, that whenever suimmoned to» | the chcumatance that she is what is commoniy cailod a | (emseives, eouclu tradiction. much Which leads your minds to ® state of | ecurt of justice, she a9 ready to respond to tas charges, | « tcreigner.”” wand the defenduat an Ameriean cilizop, | Te ence Now, let and thirt ra cer. | whem Lo sucgestion has b eon i uity ot New ¥ sowa As numvee | with whom, | preauime. it i Grid aug kev ary: our Broome street, trea ovenpied | yyy crianiz ul co uncertainty. it will bea relief to Jook back on theng facts, | ! Ut recused to attend the exaininaticn of witnessas before vice, She is entitied to the ieeye t place, you will beer in mind that ; Z ntook place. such being my im- In relation (o which there in no dispute at all, aud 1 | the lepiststive comuiitee, or todo anything except protes Gal the cou cle Ca cee cn fun by Sr. iu ppo Baztioc aid tel | jrecion an to the Iw, T supposo the Court will charge the therefore desice to call your attention, in the first in- | ©#aimst the interference of the Penasylvania Legisia- 11d L shou'd be the last person in the world to at- ttatement made by Mr siebans layot May, one thousand | Jury that thvy are net ot liberty to infer any evidence in stance, tothem That there partive were married in | (ure in their conjugnl relations, A suit was then com- ot ter any enmity any aukindowss, or il! feeliog, vu pill bear in mind that nothing coil pe more na yseven aud toa ewe day of May, oa9 | ib écore, wt Chat time and place, in the house of Mrs. 1887 or 1884; thot they came to this countiy; that they | Wenced im Peouryivania, where Mr. Ferrest hadloag | on the part cf the jury or the public, trom thy eirourm. | ite® Gan thes be ehould,on breaking ap lis home Se ee ced ry five in Greeas fet ane cone sheretore thel views will be osmened ed together in uniaterrapte} piness for some | Tesided, anda notice of this suit was served on Mya. | tbat she stands in the relation f have deserived © when his Lousehold was ence dissolved, return to eek te thekitn Comoe Money te whten ol Obes irely Lo the testimony in regard to Miss Clifton, upom eleven or twelve years; that itey agreed to sepa- | Forresc. On that being done, the whole urtiliery of tho men, heving thus call tt ome Ceiphta wi ere here wan uj family which te could See ted ti gene ane Sig ich 'T shall proceed to comment. But, let me ask, rate in January, 1640,and eatiie? tis: Sarxement ints | Jew wes exploded un Mz. Forrest's head the iastent be ef the prej ileateined tear Ue exereed ayaloet the {9 Cm Gms with: whem Reale ranide. Me Kar. Pir te aw! | iy tho teetimony in regard to Mrs, 1 va execation io May, 1849 are favo, im reapect t ceme to this city Two suits were commenced ageing | pisistil in this caee, ard having desired to present to t hes not beew so fortunate ea to te Dlesccd with obil | one ah | hevse 1 do not propose to go over it in detail, but Ide which there is little or mo diepule. at they never had | bim.ss aman who bud, is the language of the counsa | you the testimony in the cvae, etripped of all prepos. | oreo unfortunate, in @ certain re , AA the ens be ty ¢ peered of Geptarsner, ce ou prepece to call attention @ little co it, in order to see any differ: nce, so fir as the kicduer of this defendent | i upenivg this case. * attempted to transport hie wife | scsion, 20 fares I have been able to Go ao, let mo ask | T*Y be: bis fimily. therefore, cowsietrt Chis wife ant | #31 cielit hucered end ify, at a cortala house kuown a” | jo 1 stands, apd the character of that house proved is concerned—that his entire life was cneof uninterrupt- | dryond the seas, to be tried for pretended offences—u | of you whether you have entered on the consideration | Dv-rcll, When they separated of c he nought bi« ; Sioh sue Caroline svg eaull 'Y the Platntif! by the teetimony introduced by her ed kindpess to the plaintiff in (i+ suit, there is buta t for divorce, in the Supreme Court, on the ground o i this eore, and are now puasing to hear the summing | { 7/7) azd the only place he eould go to Would be Phi somo wouon or women; r tbe purpose! Now, what is established’? Buppose single particle of testimony too: utcudict. Thecencurrent wtery, ancl a suit for limited divorce, in the Supreme | uy of the tertimeny im reepect to it without any pre | 'eClebia, where log essiersromded, aud bis mocher bat Porrest, in tho oummer of | tohe the testimony of Mrs. Ingersoll alone, Sbe testimony iu the whole cate, with "he + xseption of that to t. seeking alimony, while she was receiving the | j: cice or prepostvarien egainst the defendant. Whetaer | Mv ourly remded, where he wae Lorn, where he owoed jtundred and taiety eight, ina ve che kept ® boarding howe; mea and which I advert, goes to eetabiish (is fact:—that, (with undapt allowance to which I have referred, and seek- | ycu mey not have heard and believed that heisa mano! | oUult, snd where alone was the family he eoul ‘iar anstcity of New Yorm didcom. | Weeen bearded there. Bhe tells you that Gay are the exception of that to which [advert ) he did admire |" to rest 3 a 4 testimony of Mira Foriest, whic s | sey in tno city of New York, didcom= ay ibe habit of steying different leugths of nthe sult in Peunsylvania, charging him | Yioleri vimper; whether and love hie wife; and thatit was not an admiration of | With am intention to make away wil an ordioary character—that it wes not an attention even | Perty, wed enjoining him trom psrti ofthe usual kind—that it wasan evenners of temper iging bim with am attempt to ra ry her away by force, and e ou may uct have heard thath. | C#t bir own & mun Who has conducted himseif ragely towards his | * ed ress si" it; fe. whether you way not have read of the varicue afi | ft: thet yhem & h her, and | vevits made in this care, and the statements in the oews- w I have bo of joiuing hic feom it wee com that time to this. lis Theu re > Ww LT ts this ia my hows’ aad | view cays, a few weeks, or a few months. ho tells you thet ecme ons visited there, She does net uow whether they were married or not, Mrs. Roseell explains to youthat #he ved ja vas howe extracrdivary in eay man, I think, cuder all cireum. | ° | popers, of bin tow associations, vile hadite, bia igmoranee | (2! stancee—I think you wil! be prepared to concede. Buch | coming to her house, or any place where she was; | nud went of cuitivetion; end whether there may not be | W#ited there for 1 weeks. sod lived there iaa kept by Mre, Tagersoll and proves that sie tied eighteem being bis conduct—suen being the lation cf the par. | “#0 proceeding against bim in the shape of a ne erat to | jnrors in that box at this moment proceeding to the cou. | (((™ provided wed made comiortable for him} bat months in that beuer; that she exw uo unpropriety committed fy the house, aud the naies Lo3ou the per sens Who visited there, aud, awongat the reat, two giela by the name of Chavles, but novy falivd, and ing a large pecperty he fad bare, he was always ties, be put his wife away. In respect to that there iano | prevent him from leaving thy State at ali; and all those | Sideration of this ¢: ed to visit Mere, apd took alter it, but never dispate. Sho assented to belng put away. Inrespect | Yaricus procerdirgs brought down upon bim in the | and remembering on » end the evidence adduced on tt; | 1* seme of their suspicions and pre- to that, I think you will admit, trom the evideuce, there | trimmer of 1800, of the authority of the Courts | juaiccs If such ix the ease gentiemen--if you have | & r up the residence iu Philadephia, Now. in oppo- ean be no reasonable dispute That be never hadany | of !hie Siste. Now, what was the bistory of this case as | these prejudices eguinet the defendant, lot my call your | *lento that they show @ vietting bere; there is no was subsequently abaodo ates that she difference with a human being, excep you regard the have shown it to you. Why. she suit brought for | attention fora macment to a port f the testimony | Court avout rbot; t showniathe pro heard :cmarks outside of t ch have not professional coptest between Mr. Macready and Mr. For | ‘'voree, on the ground of adultery, on the coming on of | yn this ces, w! goes to show to you~ not what I say ial, made i him to be he trevepired Now it was u ery eaily in tue day, amd rest as soch @ difference--thet he never had any differ- | the answer, was abandoned by the plaintiff, as you will | of the detendant or what avy body ya ef him—but a bere d to stay here attceted ber attention to the plan ence with abuman being except this woman, to whom | ‘*collect.and the costs paid ‘his was the disBosition | which goes to show you bis heart itecit tas much as if togethsr.and he gation for the 2 that upen one occasion a pe he was so fond and devoted, I believe the testimony in | vf the suitin the Supreme Cour, The writ of ne ereat | jt were laid ofen Ketore you, and you bad nothing to do | Is! tighteem moniba, whieh they adnuu Everyt pee a howe, in the afiernoon » womaa eames ty of Mew York aid tbe perron was taken cut. This is tr arother cocasion two young men had xone to the houre, and smoked in che bail, wud hed deem remowed. It in true, aa Mr. Weic tentifies, tnat he went into (he house, that he raw respectable men amd wemen going {nto the houre, Le went there, and hed seme d.Moulty in getting inside; he taiked. and orspk some wine, and rot m sicgle knproper remark, bet an tmproper act, took place there, to bis know. indge That is his testimoay im regard to the a Louse. After all this tvstimony has been introduced cee iike alter we have spent weeks and weeks in investigating id Rdaia the character of thia house-—aiter calling all the persona } who virtted thereafter cslilng ihe phydician who visit end who undertook to describe what his pre i the character of the ia- ion iu reg wonounts tor 1, go deed=a om “ thia case most aatistuctorily shows He put her away-— | *eainst him was set aside by the Court; the Injunction | but inepect it You will understand me, of course, | Mis Yen the first drought her to the house where she desired to go, to the | to restrain bim from alienating bis property was set | gs reterring to the letcers produced by the plaintiff in | mu", Mud this, ef cou house of Mrs Gocwin, she was invited to Mra Godwin’s, | #tide by the Court; the injunction to restrain him from | this case; andiet me say a word to you to remind you | (r*sity Of bis being bere, Ag asa gentieman swears, by her, she wastaken there.as | ‘oming to any place where his wife was, was set acide by | bow there letters were introduced “Phey were not de- | "seus iutrcauced which showed tha the testimony shows, at her own requeet, by Mr. Forrest, | th Court. “This first vexatious suit, thersfore, was | cluraticns made for the public eye; they were not atate- | | 1840, eome rorivener drew ® morte, After having dons so, @ few montus before, he was en- | sbandoned, and the costs paid. These proceedings to | wents made to te hereaiter produced; thay were not im, es of New York? avd w tirely silent as to the caure which had led to the separa. | Teetiwin his Siborty. and control him in the disposition | statements made by a third person. When e man writes | °\ , cx whether his attention wan called to z: at ull. tion; and that silence is now used as anargumentagaiast | 0 bis property and personal movemente, all of which | » letter to his wife. Le, ip law and in fact, Is writing to | Ybichit probably never wes re 18 no wvidence that bim—with what propriety, we shail prerently consider | *ere o.tained ubout the same time were all set ase by | bimself—to part ef bimaei(—and it there ever is w time | '¢ Wes When he execoted the mortgege deed | be ToLed ‘With akindaess and liberality which. 1 think, you can | the Court, and the only remaining injunction, the res- | when a man ia entirely natural and sincere, ifeverthere | / November, 1649, after he bad Ieit Phiticelpaia; that sppreciate, when this separation took piase. he allowed | (aint upcn his precerdinge in Penprylvunia, wasretain~ | je atime when be spesks truly, and justly, aod unre- | “tress im the testimony ; he unquestionably hal po his wife the iiberal sum of fifteen hundred dollars a year; | ed by the judge who isoued it; (and, almost in every ine | ccrvedly, what he feels, it is when he site down with wn- eht to vots there; snd if a mau could estsolteh a re and itis argued that this wae an evidence that he had | -tence. there procesges were set aside by the very judges | restricted friendsbip, and the legally protected secracy | MUrnce, by a seto, ik wae a very ensy Batter ty Ha the no faith in the charges mate against her, Gentlemen | wroiesued them) Thst oniy was retained, and an ap- | of the conjugal reiations to write, familtariy and friend | triderce of the parry; they mada # mitane in ailow of the jury, you will not fail to remember that, | peal was taken to the Bnpreme Contt which has | jy. akind letter to bis wife. Youwillremember too.gen- | ing him (o yete on the ground of holiting property up to this moment, he Is doing precisey the sume | Zt yet been argued This present suit was the third | tlemen, tbat these letters are eprend over @ surface of | #1 without refeirnce to reridence without Sau itat ees thing—tbat voluntarily, and Without any 0! | and fipal proceeding againac Mr. Forrest groving out of | ten or eleven years; that they began asearly aa 1899,and | uvettincd, and withoul having Ms att ities or siewsmstances of hoy agin of adultery rt u ticn of law, or any ‘specitio contract, from May, | ‘be transactions to which [ have wiverted—seuit takiog | continued till December, 1945; that they spread over a | (0 ii; be, therefore voted wbeo be had mo riakl | oi oice other ip rerpoct to the women with whom Ub » to have no cecupation toluwed ao illicit intersoarse 1849, to the moment I am repeating, he has been | ibe piace, to some extent, which was originally provided yerfod, T should say, of nine years; that they are written | 0 do so. That ia the otresn tines on which | yrs cru mitted, oF the time tho plaso wi ¢ for #livelihood—notrbat he saw auything of the kiad paying her at the rate of $1.500 a year, quarterly in ad- | for a diverce—complaining of his adnitery, chargiag him | uncer the most unteeerved circumstances. They are fami- | ‘ey rey. We deny that he removed from Poilae | ene vee cvmaitied, tt tein alove elated in this houre, bathe judged trom circumstances—-what 20, did, a repute, in conpied in wh or, il Vy and particular ony to the umber six, in real oonrest en beng ed the ous RequAIntence Wilh, xm tatys Were, ard who thought that sucd as were supposed. vanoe—tbat now, at all events, and if you please. ia ad | With the commission of a creat nomber ot offences of this | jier notes, written sometimes on a slip of wr, to say, “I iphia da June. 1b Bul gontiermen of the jury. 1 beg you torecliet, that while it specifies certain Wee the reeult of the testimony ing this house? mitted. And there is no question of it, wae body will | deroription, to the particulars of which I shall call your | will net i home to dinner.” A tewot thes are swaitten eeuquiry in this case is had Mr Forrest returned | jirces certain times, abd certain persous tt generally | The learned couuecl remarked upou the evidence relet~ concede, if the evidence authorized you x2d ine tocome | atientioninafew moments. To this suit we putinan | ar tke box cilice of the theatre, stating reasons why be |!" Peousyivania at the time when he 90 voted in this | po elodes withastalement b web such andsuchtuaes = ing to thie house ab gre n There was 00 vie to this cenclusion on the fnbject “And while we h ld sverin which we deny this charge andin which ¥e | did not return, all under the most unreserved circum. | f!s(e. when be beceme such wsident; was bem resideut |p 0 ¢ nt had sonoexicn #ttaaperven by nace —— Ornee of Mr Forrest baying extved ic, except the evi- euch beliet that he voluntarily makes this lineral alios- | voeriminate, as we Yer right todo, upon the plaistiff, | etences, axdin the mort confident relations. You will | '© Pemnnyivania in November. i8hu’ Well, now ia rete- “me conrpiaint best beew mede as to the wuerot the dence of Mrs Ingersoll, wove tesumuny was in iteedf wil | sonflict you eby int s He commented upon tov improbability of shit : ree or four and | tedce to thet, Iam reali at n loss to see bow (hove ona that there are acme three of id onree baving takex piace between Mr, Forrest ance to his wife. it is an vues vpoa the testimony mm this cass. In Fab. | th, eare, Nor had this suppor: allowed to her, as think [ | Bi stralicted fact in this | {be original charge inetitated against her in Pennaylva. | remember t nd euch additienal matter as subsequent evidence | tventy of them selected by the plaintiff, Nobody doubts |! ¢¥o opini: they treat with hima at euch a residene: a}. Which we inteaded (o be a fuli denial ‘ger contarned in th vo plaint, 1 will r “al, explicit ard Mis Clifton, and the ahence of any evidence n ehall show you, been an avowal of there being noiaten- | «rabled ua to eupply. The iaeue growing out | the acutences of the plaintiff; nobody doubts the acute. | )ver¥, 10! : 3 tact from that dewful. h is een tion on bie part to apply fore dircree Hw remowd to | of the pleading (o. which I have last wiverted, | weve of ber satneely ‘and you will bear tm mica that | ‘ty acrevge with him that he rball Laake adhe plete Now, the Gemeal tn the wnswer, imsteat of | to prove it, and siluded to ike necessary habite Philadelphia, and after liv had so cemoved he tound that | ou sre called ppon to try And. gentlemen of the jury, | smong the thournnd letters. written under all coneviv. | ©: Pevrsyivania and cbtein the civorce, In Bebrasry. | cing over ench cf the charges aud uaaing the specile Cf the ptage profession, wid evutinued:—In respect the facts of the separation bet«een himself and his wife | in dcing #0, the material inquiry for you, the first | hie circumstrnces, end with ail the irritation which | J*-, he wakes epplication to the begisiature of Penosyl- | tin 4 or places, or persope ina yeuerai aenial,in these to the tetunoay of Doty, you will reoolivot, gentle inquiry for you, will be. what are the prectee issues | these circumstances must excite, those which would be | ‘9/8 for ® divorce, and in that appiieation— being Uoen nen, that this pceiut bas been clenched for some bad been the subject of remark. and that it was ateri- buted to misconduct on his part. He entered into eor- respondence with his wife in December, 1849 to whie roil, has Ivanio—be there upon @ in resident im coe Stat Werks Areal many wits <8 had been culled to paow the intimacy that hi Jexisted between Mr. Forrest aud nted to you? And, in relation to | mest unfavorable to Mr Forreat--thore which would | 14 the Ftate of I whieb are to be pre far as the issue ia im respect to | Peyvencocdefiect for the plaintiil in the minds of the teapoly swears that th 1 will say. that wisdelphaw, d seita that t OU Will please to give attentios, rtating toherthat their | simony, I donot propose at present,and probably not | jury—thote which would most fojure his reputa- | tecnco since sbeut December, hay. shall read now sand What had they proved! AL, Forrest cipesation bad arenas the subjest of complaint inn at all, to trouble yo h any remarks, There are | ii a und moet benefit the plaintil—have unques- | £‘™ 8 printed book, page7, of tne petition of Mr. Forrest. | purpose of by Jifton were bowb weil huown, aud celebrated epeot to him and that thet was unjus’ to him,ae she por- | ciher std more important ireues in the cuae on which | {jonably been selected, Krom this vast mass of ma- | Téve i a mistake im the petition ia rr to the cre Ok | througheut the United Stu, Mr. Preemaa, of Albeny, ait, as | War called to prove toat on af tk Lule Ceeasiog Le an ve the faet. 50 culled to Bo far sa ¥. 0 wuet pars, ard on which it will be your duty to de- | teijal w!ich his correspondence would furnish, | °# e ofthe change of r je, Ido not thick there willbe any substantial dif- | (he letters to which J refer have been eelected ¢ memorial of the nn renee between the counsel e other tide and my- | by ihe plaintiff and her counsel, with a view 4 oft dey jectly weil knew and desiri shy hind of suthority to there con which made their separation a mat Know whethor she gave tions and rumors, of asonsation devee It 4 mm on Lost but be could not cuileet thal Mr Wench was butt i nowt) t aad every ooarge of i0tY Srove ihe 1 ‘a4, 06 Al titos and ia ait breve th ainat di He received to thit an usquelified denial; | *if in respect to what the issues are on which you ate | to throwing light om the character and conduct of hed hime: p bd bot sbeeils uecreame into po: raien of avidenne hich » pass. I propose to read them from this printed | the defendant. You will remember, too, that somo of : hore he hag retded tt ied with the ‘grtiona besesumed nag UAT Rreewaa nnd c. Sre cuuce: Di ‘A the Gate eould not fail to bring conviction t> him that she had k of preeeedisgs, nt page 276 for tbe purpose of | there letters were written under circumstances of irrita- | stoot the fret day of mbor, IN, when be reau @ coon, up We the per imony astoMr For aod Mis Ciittoo being em publ to see wha’ quee recidence in the city of Philadelphia. And your mem raliot comeanion, du: together baa fi enabling you to whet are the questions pr further shows, that Leia nowa resigeatof Philadelphis, ia the onat ¢ exoited, ifyou please, by travel, by ili- abrence of the comforts of home, by dis olor tun, such ae <8 the evidence in this cute di done oo Teeny eset depute and whioh proves | tented to you for trial The first inquiry is, whether | health, by th Deetor Hawke: Sy teatimony which they cannot dispa - State ¢ y ab he nas nob residod one idieulous, The caro was v2 eu moat fatlafactorily This satisfied him ayto | [he deferdent in this action. since hie marriage with | sppointmentin respect to what he supposed had been within thee eee Se tori app sation, Halon pus, The oxo wan thircl (98 jue i Mrs. Forrest's divorce, and a correapon- | ‘he pleinci im this ection, has committed adul- — sent with him, by professional rivalry, by the struggles atin London. My the oid of hated co he © . Jury to pou 2 parties io January and feb sin the complaint in this tion charged. | growing up between men in the same profession, by poy- | yyue,e married Ca v4 thay have live ao bed _ belie ~~ ate va ; Uo i ¥. 1860. whioh it wilt be necersary for you to reflrat vondly, whether the soid plaintiff and the satd do- | sicel ond intellectual excitement, by ill-health, whic Eowehees Feb vgee suse oe emeniiee beet i denial js not made plain enor pp vie hath = Ueme bee bad hens . rears i partculatly. My Forrest was then. aa we ace,a resi. | Se.dent were both inhabitants ot this Btate atthe time | his lator bad anfertunately brought upon bim, desorih. | 1) jciveve cfthe sald marriage; (ot > pz wemore iat dasie | Lt INE Uae the defendant you facket—when Uonuesticut bad | skal nem of the Biate of Pennsylrania, Be became sntis- | °F le commiccion of such aduttery by the said defend | ing the rushing of blood to his head, and the regret wit . ndvct of his wife hae to far violates that coutenst av to | will cbrerve th fe charges thare is no Inck of BA ibad Nidan hay, aren Ue slightest a’ Ubirdly. whe her such adultery was committed by | vw} ich be ferle himself forced to pursue a profession whic the defendant. They have no Allarity between Mr. borrons i te ted test @ divorce from his wife ‘must be obtained; ain him to appesi toy curtonoratie body for adivace. | q'syorition to " elf that this divorce | °* ! (:tendan’ withiv this State. Fourthly, whether. at | jecds to such physical exbaustion and illness, Under @ € makes this appen! averring an enti@iacomparibility | y\cnheid any chary has there been & want of de Hiain M. Doty prevented hureseit oes ie valle ~ * Spetyy obtained, aadkbat the feasons | the time of the commision of such adultery by th: | there chreometances, you will bear in mind that the tomper avd feeling, and thie utter impossibitisy of heppl: meee Makeic ve talenation: & bring it against him, %y? He faye thet im July, 1 loca why this ore should be cbtainod ae far ag | seid ovvendent within this State, and nleo at the | lotiors were written—-and now, is there in the wholemia | 1.1 to cisher patty i the continuance | of tie mati aon hey charge Lies with intercourre with a wambsr of per NCE know he was on U¢ te 4 ary to the object of obtaining the di- | tlvs «f the commencement of this gotion, the said | the whole, taking them from ‘first to last—evidence of | (C7 Ncthiek ANAS bis wife has committed cri nee | ponehened; f Wh che Cliaten- going to hie mother's, in . i 1 got Teroe and without avy unnreveenry injury to ber feel- Vlupptitl was an sctual inbsbitant of this Btate, | anything but the most refinea and delicate, andenitivated |‘ -\'the eviacmeo wut eeribined’ shees aud. oth Foe me ecilese tus bad clemeateoa With: Hs ¢ aa Chis ath Of Tals, ound he reaiaiabors tase siceam Jere wonts ba epread. before the publis. Mx, Forrest | 1 donot ruy that the Iast question becomes partion | feelings’ 1 speak not now of the simplicity of | \! levetsin the application of yous men ‘rot appear in avidonce t tee be wae born on tie dhol Juiy, te got then e ved Mr. Sedgwick, snd the frat we Know of | importan® on the trial of thia case 1# plaintif, | fis raiural disposition—how the minutest trifles | bicre yous henoratte bodies, dur notie Mtr 7 et Clintor e dons not tes es wh. ed tay intevtoccuee is the matter, is an tuterview between | Urdoudtedly, war on cf this State at the | had a power to plesre him. I peak not now of | tv." cotpeuite party. And tliat your imemor : Rae RN ge after ‘ho 42a ot July, Mr. Bedgwic' ond Mr OGenor vo have the testimony | filing her bill; she © inhabitante? this State | insiove of fine secnery—bis love of the fresh bracing | f: UP the Logialagure form dkecrce ftom the bond ot mstr choad vet ‘aad placus: 6 ik wae no: Hie omye Ne wad the ‘4 , » | by exprees provision of the statute, to waich refe- —hiv desire to be walking with bis wife in their y Wiese prehe iee cy oe le there wa, thitty yeare of age, and of Mr. Beés wiek that he wrote to Mr @'Jonor@in Jua- | apree oft a sir— ht re to be walking n bony. And hewilbever pray, &c. PORRKSL, at fi a enee lope Loemtee pene 4 wary, 14iv, proposing an interview to talk over there | I" may bem ‘The second revised statutes=page | jnunts at Nortolk--bis longing to have her ecjoy the to ot New Fork, City and € never eu : i‘ cata cal gabjects, Mr. O'Conor stated to mr. Bedawick, in his | 14b—provides that whatever may be the re nee Of Lh | pre day with bim—parsing Font billon the river re # With dey of F in the wtit baving pe saying that be w Be we, 6 rd reply. at au early data, (what precisely the cate was | 1 in acare of sdultery. the wile basa tight to flea | mings ther—of his love of animals, and the ser. | relly aprosred n Forrest Tucsday, (laughte twenty-nine, He. re he bout was tne A Wr, Bedavion dovs not recollect.) that he could no* a Where the offence has bean comimit | yante cf the esteblicbment. and the uniform result of |) 1/0 E12 me ou ¢ D these tany, avd that vow iu Cali atmiay fow Bry divores toe obtained on fhe g of Mer where Une injaved porvy ie ectoaily | thie effection in his messages; but, Task you, whether Tense derek Vad thet thle semeie rene rihae are ts 5 , 4 commanded it. H divs OL Forrest's wisoonduct= he could not allow it--and after » pbabitant of this State. Iden't think tb in the whoie of Uhis correspondence, from first to last EDWIN FORREST there being an aan 4 . “ terw ined up an cove : that tae Mr. Bryant wee calied into consultatto ry dfionlty or dispute between ur in respe | there is apy want or love or affection in regurd to his worn hefore me, 16th February, 1é&,, viol Gray, Commi names even t Tn & ‘to Mage athrwnhety 5 - amutual {rleod of Mc. and Mrs, Forrut—eortatny 9 | 1) P! eobility of the statute to this exes, that t Wife? Is there anything in them except evidences of | #,veyorTeeds. | i ny fat } hen spol ‘tom, and she bold man whose stand in theermmunity woald an , ot this Btate bave ation in thie offence the most devoted admiration and extreme kindness’ bat be within naitied wall t a dh 5 “4 bin » ' Taresh vets tay, Ro, etl 4 one to believe = ents acvirer, } (bat the plaintiff dition to invoke that | Do you find, anywhere, any impatient remark in reepect xe of thY Ebete ti bectri toate, situs aniseces; Hod) thay ter Fare j) thea relations of !)'e and pre emir me of the commencement of | to disappointment growing out of ber fallure to serd huredgy twonty-fites of Funrasry } scacee in a ioe pie prese and private if) He was c wae resident ia the State | whathe bad immeuicte need of? For instance, peg- February, 1°60. r ‘ at Mu C ; ’ " t Bred i Forrest fp evidence ee early Jer N Yorke fe a question, t 1 | eting to send him the manuscript of Metamera—the Ve have never been able t tee Ar 3 taeed aye te was Inic tefure him of ’ fome materiality im this case, and | shield, end wegicoting to sumd some portions of his | a) frevoua date, instead of , wt andi of ° 5 bons 2 ef tho i vey probably #h Je importance to boh ‘parties, whetlee | cress. Did be write to her, “L regret this ehould | this isnot all the testimony | ( ‘ ge - Mrs, Urderwoe®, Mr, Garvin, and rx i be { sement of thit ac | te cone; souhsve put me to great inconvenience te simple affidavit ’--end you sil b Lives x nek nl ; : 1 ae er Way aeked te advice Mre rest wh a ehould do tin the Btateof New | pot a word of this What ts the euggestion? | t Hot # particle of tes <n thats pores, bad ov that boas And | now aitention for snr nts tow letiar | ou what T suppose to be | Ir te, “Why, I might have steyed another ri cod apd conduvet neces yin i > ‘ ue a sustained & god introduce em. A }. Cth Fobeuary, show | juertion on Which yeu are to pass. and inreeepect | with you, instead of leaving and coming to Bosto: the en Ix there a doubt | nee . he one g Di ing what Dre We ling to domwhat was | © © te cfer to you such suggestions om | for ali the good 1 did; I might have comeon at the eame 1 of Pewnsytvania in Febvuaty, 18 bares ives : ‘ ead roth frown by her at (het ff jocg before the letter intro @ as rerm to me to be app Int tmewith wy things” Bat again, what ic there’ Gentle- | i arity wea & reriden’ i fu I r : ecet hy counaes on the other eide and while actually | fret plece, then, did the plaintiff reside in Pennayly ren, in there letters also, there is the most pleasing ad- | 1 1 nod hating «hoa ; | ; ne Ae “accel for her Cwo wnaided judgment, except far as a friend the commencement of thiaevit? It was come iration expressed uninterruptedip to bis wile, and for | #7 ature -.of the fact whether ha re- | 40) | t 1 Hie Me Jiryant would udvieo her, a8 a husband and | te time im September, 1860—on the 10h. 1 be nilw ¢ bis wife. No late as the fall of i818, he no until Mave | *. ; } kwh Gr hor io postension of there proofs, what was best to be | J it an leme which we present to you, and the dechs veri it. £o-and-a0 spoke to me of you, and expresad y nostic” « done in this case, ‘This letter dates Gih February, from | cf which fa regarded with so much moment by Hiede> | the bighwt admiration of you, end, of course, he wea my 0 accoun the declarativn i pr ¢ * Bir Bryant to Mr, O'Conor, and you will observe aa Tread | ('ndert. The next ingniry (wnd I mention ther to yor | y hole boat, Ido love to hear you praised by the enw enyihing to prove that. « . t : & (cinee] connot state its comtente as briefly asT oun read | ' the crdet in which 1 purpose pursuing them) will | oid andj He dove not desire the praises of tt tube declaration then made : ; pote "thet ii speaks of the Which Mrs. Forrest | Le, bes the defecdant committed the aduitery charged | cars of pertone who bed praired gud admired bis wite Kut again=this does a wee the eed to take, and you Will see how remarkably th ngainat him? And the third inquiry will be, bas the | without his knowledge; but Beeays, “Ido love to hear | i880, he egaio testified op this » eb ke aseme me yone 2 id eeny a oeeraed ¥ Mr. Bryant's tertimony of cbs subs plaintif, Mre. Forrest, commit'nd the adultery charged | you praised by the cundid and just A when | rylranie Iwill read fi the & euiled, fer 4 “ 4 i y Interview. (Gouna! Toad the letter referred to, comment. | ogainst her, There ers tke three main inquiries, | cheepeaks to het having attended ch ad | that petition which he thon presented, Fino meray One OF hatte te sencta 16% uttere ¥ vd Anger ecstala povtions of I). Daz, that wa wu the Cie | Hue be Brovered, ‘60, celcot' the: sardasony, | chaseks hesiatt fon tines, por paras Eas fo | “Wheretererqoue libelinns farther dhowing, thas be tae | TicUs Bovece, We costed eee ie ne ee wan decked | hia tradh.” We call pier. and ‘ otebruary. you must beat In'mind. On the oth of Fob, | Th ‘a ieee { i serson in the | eitieen 48% Common rea of Pennsylvanie ana bas re | PUpreme as teen Semegnetn sieies tho circumstances oomrected with hereelf. I asked thip Fuary Br, Beyant again writes to us, Bs loiter waa not with @ view to thelt decision I there are | yourcweot prayer Lahowd be the last porson im the Gied Wer, ‘or ogo shan ee Woowe vent peeriens We at by us,08 in the ABdavit of dre, Yorrost—in preciedly the | waa, whe Wece 0m the best, bathe does net know.