The New York Herald Newspaper, June 8, 1848, Page 4

‘ Wasniyevon, Tune 6, 1844. The Treaty—Rolitice Mayor Tochman's Caw, No doett ts any longer entertained os to the ratification of the treaty by the Mexican govern- ment, although the actual intelligence as yet re- | vives no other assurance than that it has netion of a majority of the deputies. have met little opposition in the evived dd the ree It will doubil other chambe The rumor of the success of the treaty created | a momentary but no more, It is regarded with perfect indifference, except by those int-rested in stocks. Mr. Sevier is expected to arnve here before the end of the week with the copy of the treaty signed by, the Mexican author- uw Congress will be apprised of its ratifieatron in # trashy and inflated message, by the President, and thas will end the Mexican war. The interest of politics is now supreme. | onything else there is no concern. ‘The Mexicans might all throw themselves into the erater of Ori- zaba, and the multitudinous suicide would cause litle emotion in the minds of whigs and demo- crats at present, so much are they absorbed in trying to solve the question who is to be next President. The people are really ured of Mexico, and they tan to the Presidency as to a fresher ex- citement. Mr. Polk wiil endeavor to make as much capital as possible out ot the ratification of this treaty, and the public will be again nauseated with tedious laudations of him in tis organ ; but the public mind will be too mach pre-oceupied, and Mr. Polk might better spare his editor the labor of constrained flutery, as it will be more advantageously employed in nove hus fealty to the vew divinity which he is called upon to worship. : The opmion preveils here, of yreseat, that Gen Svou’s prospeets forthe whig womi 2 stronger thai those of anybody els: of Taylor and Clay will have to cone tse coupromi It is “an opinion by »p® means ce fined to a few, that Scott will raa better thia Tay- lor, and those in favor of his nomination say, that in case lie obtain it, Taylor will not retire from the contest, and if either of them be elected it will be a triumph tor the whigs. But unless the election be thrown into the House of Representatives, the whigs can gain nothing by dividing. their strength, and, therefore, it may be more politic to take Taylor, even although he will still decline to give any pledges. Clay’s chances of the nomina- ton are not such they were when he passed through this city. ane The case of Major Tochman, and the minister of Russia, M. Bodisco, was brought before the House of Representatives yesterday, by means of a bill to prevent interference with the rights of naturalized citizens of the United States by any foreign power, or its agents. If Major Tochman has been deprived of his rights as anjAmerican citi- zen, by the influence of M. Bodisco, and because of his political offences against the Emperor of Russia, and of this there appears to be no doubt—certainly some means should, be de- vised to guard against such occurrences in future, and to restore to Major Tochman those nghts which belong to him, not the less that he has fought against Russia in defence of his native land. M. Bodisco 1s, probably, not aware that an adopt- ed citizen is equally entitled with him who_ has been born in the country to the protection of the laws. The only question at issue is, could M. Bo- disco have acted towards a native born citizen as he has acted towards Major Tochman? He could not, and he would not. ‘This government would not permit it, in the first place; and he, having no cause of complaint against such native born ci zen, on the part of his master, would have no rea- son for interference. But the laws make no dis- tinction between the native born and naturalized citizen ; and, therefore, Major Tochman has as strong a claim on the protection of our govern- ment as if he had drawn his first breath in this country. Mr. Levin, with that malignancy that 1s charac- teristic of such minds as his, endeavored, not in vain, to prejudice Major Toc. case, by_ad- vocating it with a great show of warmth. It is to be hoped that it will be adjudged not by the cha- racter of its advo. but on its own merits. Every body was, of course, aware that Mr. Levin spoke in vindication of Major Tochman, for the purpose of doing his case an injury, Every man of prinei- ple and decency looks suscibiously on a case hav- ing such an advocate. Gatyr 1 » June 6, 1848. The Barnburners are Coming—Elopement in High Lafe, §c. §c. B. F. Butler will be present at the great mass meeting which the barnburners intend to hold at the capitol on Thursday evening next. In the meantime, the leaders of this section are very con- fident, that Mr. Dix will write such@a letter to the meeting, as will quiet all doubts which may be en- tertained in regard to his hostility to the extension of the “peculiar institution” of the South. 1 shall transmit copies of the letters of, srs. Van Buren and Dix, as soon as I ean obtain them. Mathew Gregory, a lieutenant in the war the revolution, and one of the last of the ori members of the Society of the Cincinnati, expired at his reside on Sunday i ee rder of the President of are nds nate, a s: the Senate, at was always reserved for the old soldier within the bar of the Now his seat will be vacant we him. He was a true patriot, and, as the Argus observe Washington. His fun nded by an immense con- vulsed by an cotemporary of Geor, this afternoon was att course of citizens. The world of tashion and fun is e event which has just tak his event is depply interesting to the ¢ ry, because it several of their number who ele c spicuous positions in the social world. 1 will giv some of the leading mecid nected with thi suppre the actors. I give it th is not, nor will not pi orfaree Itappears that eighteen mont e elder son of a promiueat cit y became ardently attached to an accomplished young woman; she was beautiful, and apparently of stroug mind. She isthe eldest da tleman who resides in the interior of the State, and whe has filled many important public offices with ability. These young persons, with the enure sanction of their pareuts, were pledged to each other in marriage. he engagement which the young lady eatered into voluntarily, has beea kept, apparently, in good faith. The bridegroom elect is a young gentleman of intelligence and fine feelings ; ‘he is frank, jovial and courteous; he ha= travelled over a part of Europe, and resisted the fascinations of Lola Mont he has kissed royal hands in England and broken royal hearts in Ger- many ; he danced a pirouette with John Van Buren Baden Baden, isd partook of a collation with an lish poet in’ one of the crannies of the Coli- seum at Rome. He is a diamond of remarkable brilliancy and purity; he understands the use of the rapier, and he is a good shot. He is travelled, accomplished, and rich, and he is, withal,a gentle- man. Still he was weak enough to love a woman. The frequency with which he was thrown into ‘the society of this young woman, only in- creased his attachment for her. This teeling’ was upparently reciprocal ; he loved her and she pro- fessed to love him. ext Thursday was the day fixed upon for the marriage, cards of invitation to the wedding were issued in great numbei the arations were grand, and even magnificent sunday the bride elect, being on her way to ans chureh, with her mother, feigned sudden indispo- sition and retarned home alone. Jn an hour after she eloped with a young man, between whom and herself, there had apparently never been the slight- They were married : y evening they passed through this city on their way fo New York. This event has caused a terrible explosion among the aristoc and the cards of invitation to the wedding or ‘Thursday next, have been countermanded. est acquaintance or intim The Military Court of Inquiry. Farpenren, June 6, 1848, ‘The Court met pursuant to adjournment, at 9 o'clock this morning. Present, all the members General Scorr rose, and said, with respect to the deposition presented by the defence yesterday, whether the question were decided now or at some fa ture time, that he (Gen, Scott) was al tion of receiving some little evidence which did not come exactly under the strict rules of the Court. The Court would remember, he had no information as to the subject matter of the depositions presented by the de- fence; and it would also bear in mind, his (Gen, 8.'s) protest on the subject of depositions. He wished, in the present instance, to confine himself to the remark that he had come documentary evidence to tender to the Court; and the question of allowing it, might go together, if the proposition of the defence was considered now, or at some future time. He would noe in afew days whether the expected documents ar- rived or ne General Pi to him, wheth in expecta- w stated that it did not matter much the question was decided now or +t some future time. ile begged to say, however, that he did not regard the documents submitted to the Court ax affidavits, ar the Judge Advocate was present when bm re xamined the witnorses on the part of Gen. Seott. They are consequently depo- ritions, and not aMdavite etc ae ort—I! used the word depositions n, Piriow—The Judge Advocate said aMdavits. nm. Pin.ow—Mr President: 1 have « paper to put in,asfollows: The prosecution on the 18th day of the roceedings of the court, proposed (for Purpose of mpeachiug the testimony of Major Burns) to prove by Lieut. Clark that said Maj. Burns had been a witness before a court of which the witness (Clark) was the re- corder, beld in Pucble, in July. 1847, to which propos- was right upon every p) of law Thicnthe ented ‘of injustice done tly endeavored to the lic mind that a full and fair investigation was sti- Utterly groundless (4s the defence was persuaded) as this attempt by illegal proof, to affect the cha- racter of the witnees, the defence nevertheless saw that the prosecutor's purpose was fully answered by enter- ing his protest upon the record, and the defence has therefore procured from the office of the War Depart- ment the regular record of the case, which he avks leave to file for reference, and as proof ju this cause — It appears from this record that aid Burns was not a witness in said cause, nor is his name any where men- tioned in saidrecord. While it is difleult to under- stand, upon principles consistent with truth aud jus- tice, the motives of the motion.and protest of the pro- seeutor, made in the city of Mexico where the record could not be had, the defence is, nevertheless, huppy in being able, by the production ot the record itself. to satisfy even the prosecutor of the injustice he has done the witness, Respectfully submitted, G. J. PILLOW, Maj. Gen’), Gen, Pittow handed into court the names of a num- ber of witnesses, r ovxt—What do you intend to prove by these wit- nesses ? Gen. Pittow--That Major Burns’ character cannot be impeached. Gen. Scort—I wish to enter my protest against th paper just patin. it is full of assertions and assump- tious, not warranted by the evidence before the court— asxumptions as ingenious as the assertions are bold If the witnesses are called as to the character of my witness, 1 shall also feel it my duty to bring forward evidence as to the character of that witness. (Burn ) which I had uot in my possession in the city of Mexi co. The young man whose evidence ix referred to (Clark) made a mistake in regard to the paymaaters, lie meant Major Burnett. and not Major Buras But (ue court will remember, that in that case it would not aliow the question to be put to the witness ~and my remarks asserted nothing. The paper only argued & point of law—it contained no injurious assertions—as suming one thing and arcning feom that. L think pro- bably it was paymaster “Burnett, and not paymaater Buras. the witoess meant. I again repeat, that the as- vertions contained in that paper are— Covat.— Parties will recollect that the court has ¢s- lablished rales for ite regulation, and that the discus- sion is entirely in oppovition to these rules. The par- Lies will remember that every paper presented to the court must be couched in language duc to the court and to the character of the parties as officers; and the court will not permit any improper language. either verbally or in writing. In justice to the court. I will state why that witness's testimony was not allowed: ft was in consequence of the party interested not belug present. With respect to the rules of this court, they will hereafter be more rigidly observed than they were in Mexico. ‘The court will take into consideration the paper submitted by Gen. Pillow. Gen. Pit.ow.—I beg to state to the court, | am not aware that I have violated the rules of the court. Gen. Scott has been allowed to proceed with his remarks. J beg to say— Count.—The question is decided, sir. Gen. Scorr.—As soon asthe court is ready, I propose to examine Gen. Quitman. Gen. Pitow, (to Ge: Gen, Pearce is in the town? Gen. Scort.—I am not aware, sir, ifhe is. With your consent, however, Gen. Quitman shall be first’ ex- amined Gen. Quitman sworn.—Q. Was the witness presont at Piadad, Sept. 11 last, at the full conference then and there held by Major General Scott with many of the principal officers of the army? If so, please state the leading views or propositions discussed by the said Scott on that occasion, respecting an attack upon the enemy the following morning? A.—I was present ataconference of the principal officers of the army held at the village of Piedad, on or about the 11th of September. 1 could not give the pre- cise date without reference to papers. There were the engineer officers, and many of the principal officers of the army were present. I'recollect General Scott pre- sented, in a good deal of detail, his views of an attack upon the city. He first, 1 think, went into an examina- tion of the merits of an attack upon the city by the gate of San Antonio, which had at first, it appeared to me, been contemplated by him, or at least had arisen inhis mind. He requested the engineer officers present, and the other officers who had examined the works of the enemy in the vicinity of Piedad, to communicate in detail the resuits of their observations, which were given. He then declared that he was thinking aloud among his officers. He was in the habit of using that expression. He proceeded to compare the propriety and policy of an attack upon the cityin that quarter, with an attack upon the fortress of Chapultepec. He presented in detail the arguments for and against both these approaches upon the city, stating that it was ly important that he should come to an immediate conclusion upon the propriety of advancing in one or the other direction, and declared that before leaving his seat, he should definitely conclude upon one or the other movements immediately. Without remembering heJanguage he used, he evidently signified his deter mination, should he not change his mind before the conclusion of the conference, to attack Chapultepec, and through it advance in that direction. He desired the free opinion of the officers present upon the merits of the two movements, stating that although he would not pledge himself to be governed by them, he desired them for his information. Q. Does witness recollect what were the views of jor General Pillow on the «ame occasion, and in re- pect to the said two approaches—by the San Antonio ‘ate and the castle of Chapuitepec—and if so. what red_to be the bias of the said Pillow’s mind, as to dice between the two approaches ! Gen. Pillow appeared to be that evening more re- d to me than usual in expressing his opinion. | ollect, in discussing the subject, being myself of opinion in favor of an attack upon the Garita San An- tonio; I waited his opinion with some interest. He discussed the subject very briefly, and, to the best of niy recollection, did not express any decided opinion upon either attack, although | inferred from the gene rat tenor of his remarks, that he inclined to prefer the ances upon the works in front of San Antonio. and t Piedad, Of the general officers present, I believe fter the remaris nade by General Scott, that 1 com- municated my opinion more in detail and more defi- nitely than any other. Q. Was the witness present at any subsequent con- ference held at tue quarters of said Seott, in Tacu- haya’ and if so, please to state when. Also, the plans {attack by batteries, to be tollowed by assaults, ou the castle of Chapultepec, or definitely settled and laid down by the s cott, in that conference, and the parts assigned to Major Generals Pillow and Quitman pectively A. | was present = Seott)—I beg to ask, sir, if t the conference alluded to sub- It was held at the quarters cubaya, on the night of the I came into the conference after. eral officera and engineers hastily summoned to tt the batteries, where I was in command, 4 ject of the conference appeared to have b ned before my arrival. When [ arrived the ques d to be ax to the efteet of the bombardment Apon the castle of Chapultepee, After ing received the reports of the engineers and other ificers as to the effect the bombardment of that day had made upon the fortifications of the enemy, which were that they were supposed to be such as might be repaired during the night, General Scott remarked that we should be obliged to carry it by storm ; upon which he made some enquiries of Generals Pillow. Worth and myself. in relation to the supply of sealing Indders pick-axes. and other means necessery for storming the fortrest 2th of September. hud ve, moxt of the sembled. Charles Albert, King of Sardinia. In the great drama now being enacted in En- rope, many public characters stand prominently before the world’s gaze—and_not the least conspi- cnous of these, is Charles Albert, King of Sardi- nia. His march into Lombardy, at acrisis like the present, at the head of thirty thousand troops, is one of the most daring acts on record. He comes to the rescue of a people worn down by foreign chains and despotisin, and on his banner is im- scribed “Independence and nationality to Italy.” I s the armies and the power of a mughty e pire, and throws himself im the deadly breach, battling for the rights of man. In whatever light he may be regarded, the attitude he has assumed is a proud one, and must excite wonder and admi- ration. If he is actuated solely by motives of self- preservation and personal aggrandizement, we must admire hun as a sagacious statesman, avail- ing himself of the new impulse awakened in Italy to preserve the integrity of his dominions, and to add to their grandeur and extent. If his motives are pure and patriotie; if, throwing off the shackles of opinion—which have fettered the minds of a ruder age, and under which his own may be said to have been formed--his views have” become more enlightened and enlarged; if he_ is sincere in his wish to give a more extended freedom to his countrymen, and to improve their moral and social condition; he presents, a spectacle still more worthy of our admiration. ‘The character ot Charles Albert has been assailed by the liberal i in Italy. He has been accused of a want of good faith, when, as a chief of the Carbonari, he stood at the head of a formidable conspiracy, and espoused the cause of constitational freedom That he abandoned these views at that period— that be mounted a throne, suddenly falling to him by inheritan that he feneed it round with arbitrary dee and a Jarge standjng army— cannot be . He might have seen that the cause in which he had been engaged was ahopelese one—that the league of Italian States {d not then be formed—that unity and concen- excess, could not be at- e conceived, as a shrewd not, by its enligitonment, oad representative government, usness and anarchy would follow in its train. He might have felt, that the time and the circumstances for the deyelopement of liberal views had not arrived, and tha¢ jf was imprudent and unwise to sap the very foundations of civil liberty by a premature movement in its cauge. Ie was at this juncture confirmed by the Congress of Vienna, King of his c sent dominions, con- taining a population of four millions and a half. For the maintenance of public order jn a portion of Italy then greatly agitated, it was enjoined on. him, by the allies, to raaintain an enrolled force of trom 60,000 to $0,000 men, ready at any time to be called into the field. With Austria oceupying, with her armies, Italy on the north and east, and to do #0, he neni bes have given to his people a liberal form of government, without exciting the ogy and resentment of Austria, and thus use- lessly staining the fields of his coyntry with blood. ‘We would remark, in passing, that it redounds to his credit asa statesman and a monarch, that for many years he has maintained security and peace in his kingdom at home, and caused ‘it to be re- spected abroad—that its national debt has not been augmented, and that its financial affairs have heen managed with singular prudence and ability. That tor many years, under the circumstances to which we have above alluded, he used the armed force placed at his control, to consolidate his power, and to awe and keep m check his discontented subjects, is not to be wondered at; nor matter of sarorise that he should witahold h fidence from his former associates, and re some distrust, those w principles and aims were opposed to the st of his government. He might have honestly regarded their views as impractieab'e, and pregnant with danger to the tranquillity aad interests of the State. Ilence the chief cause of his unpopularity in a part of his dominions, which we are free to admit, and more particularlyinGenoa, ; Such are the peculiar difficulties of the in which he has been placed since the pic of Europe in 1815. The suggestions we hav thrown out may serve to show that his professions at the present time of liberal principles and a de- sign to emancipate Italy, may be as honest as they have been boldly avowed. Let us look to his con- duct at the preseat crisis.. His course has been marked by great zeal, firmness, and good sense. When the agitation in Sicily and Naples extended its influence to his own dominions, und he was called on to make concessions to the people, he stidin substance: ‘ To rebellions subjects I grant nothin, down your arms, and I may give you the constimtion you demand.” Peace and confi- dence were restored at onee. He had long watched the state of feelingthroughout Italy; he had marked the political changes there ; he saw that a new set of opinions had sprung up, or that the old ones, smouldering long, were about to rekindle into flames; that all Italy aspired to, and would make a desperate struggle for, a broad constitutional free- dom. He saw that Naples, unawed by her king, and the mmor States and duchies of the peninsula, would unite in the general movement. The Pope sid promulgated the most tiberal views,and pledged his own resources and his influence over other Ca- tholic powers, to advance and support them. ‘Tus- cany, with its kind and patriarchal monarch at its head, had taken a decided stand against despotism; and his own population were enthusiastic in the cause of national freedom. The time foraction had arrived. A league of Italian States could now be formed. Italy could now be rid of the intruders on her soil—she could hurl back defiance to the tyrants who have betrayed and enslaved her.— harles Albert was called on to decide. He did not hesitate as to his course; he espoused the views of the Pope, and threw out a menace to Aus- tria. Atthat time it must be borne in mind that the great changes had not taken place m France and on the continent; and the movement was a bold one. How nobly, and at what fearful risks to himself, has he carried out the course then be- gan. Relying on the union, the armies and re sources of the Italian States, combined with his own, he has marched with a small force of thirty thousand men to effect the liberation of the oppressed Milanese, and to secure independence and nationality to Italy. He has set at defiance the giant strength of Austria; backed by the count- less legions and the vast resources of the Rus despot. Nor was this, though daring and decisive, so rash a step as may at the first glance be sup- posed. He felt he could rely on the sympathies of England, the aid of France, and the ‘co-operation of Prussia, if required, as well as on the See of a part of the German States, Italy was herself all-powerful, if united, with her population of twen- ty-five millions. Braving the chances against him, his banner now wayes on the fertile plains of Lombardy. He is on the eve of a great battle, that will exert a decided influence over the destinies of Italy. On its result hangs the question of peace or war to Europe. If lost, France will be at ones im the field; if won, the nationality of Italy will be secured, and Charles Albert, at the head of the great confederacy of the Italian States, will be hailed asthe benefactor of his country, and the fearless defender of her liber- i It may be said that his aim is to drive Aus- from her Italian possessions, whose power he ds so near to his borders, and to enlarge his own territories by a successful war; and that in case of success, and on the assumption of a new power so extended, he will consolidate an arbitra- ry government, as before. That he should desire to expel Austria and her iron despotism from Lom- bardy, and that he should aim at extending h dominions, is not improbable ; but it is not pract cable, neither if it were, would it be politic for him to forge new chains for the people of Italy. He has proclaimed his liberal prineiples to the world; he has armed and fought in their cause; he has risked his fortunes and his throne--he has pledged his royal word, to support free institutions; and he cannot, he dares not, recede—and if he dared, the people ‘of Italy now feel their power, know how to r rights, and would rise ia one mighty mass to dethrone him. He would not be safe for in hour. The time is past when the people wl bow in abject servitude to thrones, or crouch at the feet of despots, Thus, as we have shown, the per- sonal 8 ity of Charles Albert, the permanency of his kingdom, his true policy, his consistency in the of the world, the maiatenince of his honor and of a royal pledge, all apart trom his sincerity, guarantee to Italy the realization ot her hopes of freedom. If his promises should fail, she has but to eall ont her awakened energies, to arm in the might of her people, in defence of her rights; to st no more to princes, and to prostrate thrones e dust, never to rive on her soil again, Bat we have faith in Charles Albert; we believe him to be honest and sincere in his purposes, as he has -hown that he is brave and decided. We be taat be is politie and sagacious, and that he aims to aggrandize Italy, and feels that this can only be done by a bond of, union among the States, and by giving to each a free constitution, with monarchy as its basis. We hope to sve him accomplish the grand objects he has undertaken; and trust that he will, by his consistency and adherence to his pledges, and to the principles he avowsa, gain a proud and enduring f.me. : Since the above was written, we are advised that Milan, having declared for a republic, and taken a stand against a constitutional monarchy, Charles Albert has receded from the position he had assumed, and has intimated his intention to withdraw his troops, after having accomplished his mission of driving the Anstrians from her ter- ritories, This does not change our opinion of his views or character, as we were aware that he was no advocate of republican governments in Italy, snd more particularly in a State immediately bor- lering on his own. We cannot expect a man to follow so suicidal a policy. A republic on his very borders would be fatal’to the existence of his throne; aad he did not march against the armies of the two great powers of Europe, to hurl destruc- tion on himself. He acts as any sensible, prudent, but determined man, would do, He offers a free representative government, with all due consti- tutional checks and_privi Bat he knows that the States of Italy, Sardinia with her aristo- ic elements above all, cannot be consolidated and guarded securely under republican institutions. But even were it his conviction that they could be so governed, it cannot be exvected of him that he would give up his own kingdom, and incur fearful risks in a cause which, if successful, would pro- duce his downfall, and the ruin of his fortunes. We are aware that we are taking unpopular grounds on this question, and that strong preju- dices are entertained against Charles Albert—but time will decide all. J.J. B ‘The steamboats Wave, the St, Louis, Oak and the Lake of the Woods. have Feoentiy been employed in navigating the Oxage river as high as Osceola. They took up and brought out fall freights, and demonstrn- tod very satisfactorily that. with @ small expenditure of money, that river can be made navigable for seve- ral months of the yenr. The Wave went upon three fect water. and touched the bottom only once, A rise followed. and the other boats experienced no diffleulty whatever in puking their way.—St. Louis Republican, May 31. Law Intelligence. Supreme Court, June 7.—Bef re Justices Shankland, Ellis apd Gray —flston and Wife vs. Jones and others. ~The Will of the tate Jno Mason.—This is an appeal from the decision of one of the circuit judges. It seems that Mr, Mason died some six or seven ego, leaving a very large fortune, having first made is will and appointed executors. The latter lodged the will in the surrogate’s office. and caused the necessary steps to be taken to obtain probate. Some of the heirs being dissatisfled, entered opposition, aud, after con- able litigation, the gprrogate decreed probate, ‘The decree was appealed trom to the clrouit judge, Gut the latter affirmed the surrogate's decree, Mr. and Mra. Alston now appeal from the decision of the cir- cult judge, The case is likely to occupy the remainder of the week. Serenton Count, June 6.~Before Judge Vanderpoel. ——Brishane vs, Adams.—This is an action brought by the plaintiff, to inquire into the right of the defendant to vedain the possession of two transferring presses, pur- chased ot @ saje, ynder 9 Jandlord’sexecution, Adams purchased the property a4 the agent of Brishaue, and refused to render it to the plaintiff agreeably to con- tract Surenron Covnt—Before Judge Sandford—Ernest Zachrisson vs, John N Ahman—This was an action of trover, brought to recover the value of two parcels of eotton, one parcel containing 85 bales and the other 130, ‘The cotton was put on board the bark New York, ‘The amount claimed is be- coutrolling, by her giant power, every State and | See ue aut eee inane dollars, with interes, stati Sanaa Ses is He also iethe olevk named Sauger, who was to continue in the counting-room to carry on the busingss wader the directions of Mr. Weissman, [n Murch, 1847, Welrs- manu intending to send cotton to Gottenbarg, and hearing that Grinnelix Minturn had a vessel to charter, he sent Sauge: n to know the terms. A nego- dingly entered on, aod, finally, the bark New York was chartered to take the cotton to ‘The charter party was -igned by Weiss- man, in the name of plaintiff, and wituessed by Sau- ger. Weissman next purchased the cotton, and di- rected Sauger to see it shipped and have the bills of lading and other papers made out. He aiso drew bills of exchange. on the consignees at Gottenburg. against the cargo. [t next appeared, thet after Sauger had the bills of lading usade out, he pledged thei to de- fendant for $6000, which he converted to his own v and afterwards confessed the fact to Weissman. Weiss- man then called upon defendant to deliver up the bills of lading. which the later refu: The dete that Sauger acted for the plainti® as agent or t and not as aclerk; and that one of thy powers dental to the former office, is that of selling or pledy ing, und therefore, that the plaintiff is bound by his agent's acts. Adjourned to to-morrow (‘his morning) Cineurr Coun, June 7 —Before Judge Galen Otis e: at. cs. Elando Greenjield and Nathaniel Leavitt, impleaded with Willan Titus-'thix was an action for goods sold and delivered. There way no = | proof of partner-hip, as against the two first defend- anty, aud as to them the plaintiff was uonsuited. A verdict was rendered against the other defendant for $208 21. Usiteo Srares Distrret Count, iv Apairaty. June 7 —Before Judge Betts,—John TD’ iWulf et. al. vs 194 Shawls and other articles, wtnthony Bareluy, Esq , aad wther Claimantsy.—This is a libel for salvage. The libellant was consignee of the American bark Reliance. ot which Thomas © also one of the Hibsllants. It appeared U box just, the Relianee sailed from Liver port ; that on the I6ch of that month well in with the British bark Lady Ken ne mouth of the Bay of Biseay. off the count of Portugal. ‘Phe Ledy Kenna- Way was shortly before abandoued by her erew. aud was, at the tins she was boarded, direlect—there war no living thing found on board except a monkey — Capt. Crowell took out the shawls in question, to- gether with some other articles, cousisting of spars and rigging, and proceeded on his voyage. naway was afterwards fallen in with by a Danish mer- chantman, aud brought into come: port on the south- i tofireland Afi t. Crowell bad arrived custom house and instituted the present suit to recover salvage. The claimants insist, that to entitle the libellents to sal- vage they should have brought the Lady Kennaway into a British port; that not having done so, their claim fails. They also insist that the master of the Reliance actod improperly in going on board and tak- ing out any part of the cargo, and afterwards abandon- ing hor. For these reasons they contend that the libel should be dismissed, Judgment reserved. Usir Before » Stares Co ins, Denny, Francis Me Guire. Wm. Jones, lip Pease and Duncan Thompson.—The prisoners were brought before the Commissioner. on a charge of endea- voring to make a revolt on board the ship Arche! der the 2d seetion of the act “ougress of 1835. The testimony on the part of the United States, and the ad- missions «f prisoner's counsel, preseuted the following facts:—The prisoners shioped at New Orleans. and with the exception of two of the men, signed shipping arti- for a voyage from New Orleans to Havre, and thence to one or more ports in Europe, should the mas- ter require, and thence back to a port of discharge in the United States. At Havre the Archelaus took on board 250 passengers and six or eight cases of glass ware, belonging to some of the passengers, for the port of New York; and also the cargo of the “ John Cad- mus,’ (a vessel bound from Liverpool. that had put into Havre in distress ) to cenvey on freight to Charles- ton. The Archelaus arrived at this port on the 2d of June, landed her passengers and their baggage, and the six or eight cases of yiass ware. ‘The captain was then about sailing from this port to Charleston, to de- liver the cargo of tl Cadmus, when the crew claimed that the voyage was ended on the arrival at this port, and refused to proceed to Charleston. An afli- davit was then made by Capt.Boutelle that the crew had made a revolt, a warrant was issued by the Commis- sioner, and the prisoners brought up for commitment. It was held by the Court that the shipping articels designating a port of discharge in the United States ag the terminus of the voyage, and the vessel landing her passengers and entering 4 part of her cargo at this port, made it the port of discharge referred to in the shipping articles, and discharged the seamen from any obligation of proceeding farther with the vessel. The priseners were accordingly discharged, J 7—Bofore Judge Daly—Charles Bratley vs. Eugene telas —This was an action for assault and battery. Tho plaintiff is a hack dri and last summer drove one of Mr. Booth's carriag on the night of the 25th June, 1847, he drove a lady and gentleman to the Park theatre; the defendant and his family were there the same night; after the play was over, as the plaintiff alleges, the defendant caused his coachman to drive across the street. and then seized tho plaintafl’s horses by the heads, pushed them back violently, and attempted to drive bis carriage ahead of the plaintiff's, towards the sidewatk; the plata tiff resist nda scuflie ensued ; during the murs the lady and gentleman for whom the plaintilf was in ‘i ‘ot into the carriage, and the plaintiff drove the defendant had pat his family into his he got into a hack. and pursued the plaintiff and While in the pursuit got on the coachman’s box. took his whip from him, and when he came up to the plaintiff laid it on to him. For this assault and battery the action is brought, For the defence, it was said the defendant's ca'riage was first at the theatre. bat that his coachinan had not crossed over; that there was a space of three or four yards between the heads of plaintiff's horses and the carriage in front of him, and Uhat defendant's brother taok the horses by the heads and pushed them back gently, so as to make room for defendant's carriage; that while doing xo the plaintiif struck him twiee with his whip, and in ot! 8 veted very ntly, and that he also struck the defendant after he had come up with him in Broadway. Phe judge charged the jury that if ch nt committed the first assault, the plain- ted to their verdict. ‘The amount of da- mage was also a question for their consideration, and in assessing it, they should of the ease into their consid ‘o-norrow (this morning.) Common Pie Jane 7: nd Hatt The Genenat Srssto Aldermen Frankli District. Attorney. Litticbridge, alias La stood ind for keeping a certain governed and disorderly house n said house, for their own Iucte and gain, certain persons, as well men as women, of evil name nud fame, and of disho- nest conversation, did perst to fre, gether; aud the said men other days and tin awfully aud wilfully did cause and procui nd exhibit (hemselyes for the iuere and gain of (hem the said Birdseye and Lillibridge. in various scandalous, lewd, lascivious, ob: scene and indecent groupings. attitudes, postures, and positions. to the manifest corraption of the public mo. tu (hese were the express words containedin the first count of the indictment. to which there were four counts, Both the pri *s appeared to belong to the more intelligent class of citizens. and counsel was as- igned to the former by the Court, namely Mr, Rus- |, with whom were associated Messrs, Daviel Major and MeMahon for the defence, who respectively moved for a postponement of the trial, on the ground of the absence of naterial witnesses for the defence. This was resisted by the District Attorney on part of the prosecution; when Joxas B. Puittis, Esq., opened the case, detailing the facts, which will be found in evidence. Police officer Caneexten. of the Fifth ward station, was the first witness examined by Mr, McKeon on the part of the prosecution.—I received a communication {rian anonymous letter, stuting that an exhibition of the model artists would take place at No. 1 nal street; went up and looked at the place in the eve- ning; feund, on entering, a double room, with folding doors, in which was a staging; this wason the 2lst 07 March; 1 was asked by Birdseye if I had heard any- thing of the exhibition that was to take place, and | said [ had; J went there about half-past eight o'clock on the evening of the 23d of March; T was passing in. and was asked for a ticket; I said T had none; [was ed in by & man named Hamilton. | There about 200 persons present, at the time; the ing was about two feet high; five of the artiste xhibited, and were naked, with’ the exception of a small piece of gauze that covered about a foot round the hips and parts ‘n front and rear on this part of the person, ‘The last was entirely naked ; [ was dosired to yo there by Alderman Adams and make an arrest; 1 arrested Hamilton, and Hannah Smith, one of the fe- male artists; [found them both concealed up in the rafters. (Loud laughter.) I was invited to go and see the exhibition by Birdaeyo, Cross-examined by Mr. MeManox.—Lillibridge said he had control of the house, which he had hired until May. and let to Birdseye. Witness had boarded with Lillibridge for a short time at Canal street, Tuomas H. Monto, {poiteeman,) testified that he was prosont on the evetiing of the 23d March; saw several men going into the house; several men were going to the exhibition that ovening ; asked to see Mr Carpenter, who was Snide, and | was refused admit- tance first; I was then admitted; went into the room ; there was a staging raised, xo ne five or six fe wide ; some of the audience remarked that “they did not got enough for their money,” upon which one of the females threw off her garment, and appeared then entirely naked ; she wore a gauze dress, through which her person could be seen ; her namo was “red headed Nell ;°—[roars of laughter]—saw another girl with a gauze yell covering her pe’son ; it was so transparent that | could see her naked person through the gauze ; she was facing the spectators ; the Jast I saw was a girl quite gt the end of the stage; when I came out | saw Alderman Adam: ; when I returned J saws man lifting one of the females over the fonetin an adjoin- ing yard ;—flaughter}—the fomatos were arrested, five of them, all yrostitutes—Fanay Smith Charlotte Whit- lock, Eleanor Doyle, Mary Jackson, and Laura Liver- more ; these were all dressed when they were arrested. Atonuman W. Apaots testified that he had been called upon by oMcer Carpenter, who informed him of the exhibition—went towards the house in Canal street—did not enter the house or see the exhibition— arrested Lillibridge ; let him go, howover, that night. presented himeelf as being # man of family—did Birdseye that Dig: Lavaa Livermore, one of the females who had exhib- ited a8 one of the artists, qn the ovcasion referred to, was here placed on the standon the part of the prose- cution, as State's evidence, Laura was of fine. portly stature, and connoisseurs in this line of art wouid have pyonouneed her an excellent subject for the Venus De- jedius, or the “aauro eyed Goddess Minerva,” She ts lex D. Birdseye, pmmon and itl- h, Chere on said and : ‘ wa . Twa of hake. Tat rae the gist’ pis Ra Mrovelved $8 it each, and one Geatinat $3. Birdseye was directiog the exhibition—saw the girls going on the stage. — ‘They were naked. Birdseye said she was to be en- gaged until the Ist of May. Cross-evamined by Mr. Mason—Never saw Birdseye before that evening; would know him now; counsel knows very well that she (witness) exhibited herself on thut occasion, (laughter); some of the watchmen help- ed her over the fence. (loud laughter); there were two of the figures nake: ‘as in the same room with them; the curtain was up; there were holes inthe curtain, and they could see out through the holes, (laughter); the women threw off the gauze to expose their persona, on direction from the men inside; they did this because the audience cried out to have the women do so, THR DEFENCE. Mx. MeMatan, on part of the defence, here rose. and contended that this was no offence at common law. Covwr—You can demur to the indictment if you please, ‘This is a question for the jury. Mn. Me Manon—To constitute the offence charged, the exhibition must be public, and this exhibition was uot a publ’c one District \rronney—Wel was a nuisance Mn Mc Manon hereupon opened for the defence, after which Cuanirs A. Zannow (tbe reputed husband to dame Adolph) was the first wituess sworn for the de- fence. He testified, he had seen the whole exhibition, and was invited there bya student of his, Every one with whom he conversed.said it was the most modest ex- hibition of the kind they had seen ‘There was a sort of wire net work between the spectators and the artists. The artists worea slight covering as deseribed The last exhibition was naked—the people murmured and hibition was too modest before this time — xhibition 1 was invited to go into the room rye—heard Birdseye tell” the women “not to take off the drapery”+could recog: nize several whom had seen — there. Cross exansned by Mr. Mekrox—Lam not the hus- baud of \iadame Adolph, { live with her. but not in the same apartment. lama surgeon, and carried on the business for thirty years. | lived at No, 50 Bowery; came there from Hester street, where | lived before. for one year. I have lived here for two years. I arrived here from Boston, after which I first put up at Loril- lard’s hotel. I then put up the Shakespeare hotel, 1 then kept house; | saw you at Madame Adolpe's; you went to consult her. (Roars of laughter) This was the time of the election, when she told me you went to consult her. (Renewed rosrs of laughter.) Mr McKxon—What took me there? Did she tell you? (Laughter.) Wirtness—She said you went to consult her as to how your election would go, (Immoderate roars of laugh- Ler.) Mr. McKron—I had no occasion to consult any one about that, for I knew very well how it would go, my- show it to the jury. It by Bil self, Witxess—May be #0, but she told mo. (Laughter.) Mr. McK Gentlemen, this is all falso—a tissue of falsehood, I never saw the woman in my life. (Con- tinued laughter.) Tell me, sir, were you ever arrested in Boston or elsewhere ? Witxess—I wont tell you. Q.--Or charged with any crime? wont tell you. ---Were you ever in the State prison at Boston ? A.—I was not. Iwanted to see the bosoms of th girls. Ihave no doubt there were wire screens used, T deseribe. The Rev. Isaac Oxcuano, of the Baptist Church, testified that Birdseye lived for a year in his house; never heard him say an immodest word ; can’t swear anything as to his general character ; he was living at witness's house when this thing occurred; he came in generally very late, from 12 to 2 o'clock ; ho is aman of family and has a wife, No cross examination. Cwantes J. Busuxeut, attorney and counsellor at law, testided as tothe good morel character of Lilly- bridge ; his knowledge of the same was acquired pro- fessionally ; he had heard that a letter had been tor. warded from Georgia to Mr. MeKeon, from a democrat there, interposing on behalf of prisoner Littlebridge. Mr. McKeon remarked that he never noticed, and would not notice, any letters of the kind, where it was presumed that polities could be allowed’ to clash or interfere with his official duties. Dr, Atrnep Uriax testified as to the good character of Birdseye. He could not swear as to general cha- racter. A witness was produced, and corroborated tho testi- mony of last witness as to the good character of Birds- ye. He could not swear as to general character. and d been present at the exhibition on the night in ion. The court took a recess, when on reassembling, the case was summed up by Messrs. Major and Russeil for the defence, ney for the prosecution, The jury was hore- upon charged, and retired to their jury box, where, after three minutes’ deliberation, they ren: dered’ verdict of guilty. On being asked the usual question by the Court, as to what they could say why sentence should not be pronounced, both ad- dressed the Court, stating it was their first offence, and would not be repeated. ‘The Court sentenced the pri- ‘sgners to pay a fine of $100 each, aud to be also eon- fned for 30 days in the city prison. Forfeited Recognizances—W. Saffard, J. Beck and Frederick Haufaer. Pleaded Guilty.—George S. Fairman, on a charge of false pretences. Remanded forsentence. The Court adjourned to 11 o'clock this forenoon. Junr. 6.—Before the Recorder and Aldermen Down- ingand Dodge. John McKeon, Eq District Attorney. At the sitting of the court, the following Grand Jury sworn:—James Harper. foreman; Dudley P. Ar- d, Henry Brevoort. Aaron Arnold, John A. Bunt- ing. Walter 8S. Cunningham, D. Charles Davis, Samuel Mayeock, John MeManus, John G. N on, Abraham Quackenbush, Joho Siearns, Charles H. Buxton, Ow- 4. James Connor, Isaac Williams, Levi Under- zh—18 in all Recoxper hereupon addressed them :— oath which you have taken, requires you to es brought before you, and the District Attor- The The Uligently enquire into all chai and to do so impartially—you are, also, to keop secret the counsels of the State. The object of this is suf- iciently obvious. and tended to the public good. This vas the palladium of the republic. Grand Jury hould not, also, he continued. rece letters It was the gu to call the attention of the jury to ail matters connected with arson, larceny, and usury. There was no doubt that many cases of arson the work of incendiaries, and cften led the way for perjury, with a view to enable to defrand the in- surance offices. The learned Re ‘dor next called at- ion to the Inte act r the punishinent of seduction adultery that passed the legisinture, und exhorted m to aid in carr, 1g out the objects of those salu- tary laws. The ob tof all punishment was reforma dion, and it wa ain to talk of reformation while immorality was ‘Ain their very midst. should introdu utary rms into prisona, also. th ed'so determined on the punieh- ment of the body that they disregarded the impre ment of th jud He next exhorted them to im into the rt ia the city. amd whether allinfractions of the laws re- lating to public health had been properly punished. sIssault- and Batiery.—Margaret’ -¢Namara came forward to prosecute Martin Graham for assault and battery. ‘The prisoner was not present in court, bo ing sick in bed. when the prosecutrix took the stand. a ber testimony. she stated that the difficulty out of whieh the axeault originated. was caused in conse- uence of complainant taking astick of wood. In her cross-examination, she swore she did not take hold of the prisoner's sister-in-law by the hair of the head, «x charged against her, The jury rendered a verdict of quilty. with strong recommendations to merey. Forfeited Recognixance —James C. Bogardus, John canlar, James Wilson and Robert Rice, were called in the ordinary form, having forfeited their recoguii- sunce. Henry Ackerman, a German lad, about fifteen years of age, was put on trial charged with stealing a pair of boots, from John Fish, who keeps an emigation board- ing-house at No. 4 Rosevelt street, in this city. The deposition of Fish was the only testimony introduced for the prosecution, Counsel for prisoner «tated that the prisoner was of respectable character, and arrived hore from Bavaria, on the 19th January last.” That he pnt up to board with Fish, who induced him to draw a bill of exchange on bis father. who was residing in rmany. ‘The'dill was for $80, whieh was not paid. Witnesses were examined. who testified that prisoner was # sadder by trade: and had been employed in that capacity where property was exposed, and he did not take any—and was otherwise of good character, The Recorder charged in favor of the prisoner, The jury rendered a verdict of not guilty. The prisoner was hereupon discharged, The Court adjourned to 11 o'clock this foremoon. Court © —Tis Day—Cireuit Court—402, 29, 32, 33, 35, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46. 414.47. Superior Court—69 to 76, 82, 84 to 90, 03, 95, 97, 99, 102, 27, 3, 5, 7, 83. 106, 108, 109, 110. 112 to 117. Com- mon Pleas—66, 117, 133, 60, 328, 60, 70, 72, 78, 80, 84, 88, 110, 114, 124, 134, on or THE SurReme Court or Penns ty THe Cancrsty Stave Riot Case. —An argument took place during Inst week, on a writ of error, before the Supreme Court, now sitting at Harrisburg. in the care of the eleven colored men who were committed at Car- lisle last year on acharge of riot, growing out of ar attempt to remove some alleged fugitive slaves out o} that place by their master, the particulars of whioh ven at the time of thelr oceurronce. Each of endants wore sontenced to undergo imprison. ment in the Eastern penitentiary for the term of three yeats. The counsel for the defendants contended that the court erred in sentencing them to imprisonment in the Eastern penitentiary, the offence being but a mis- demeanor, for which the law authorizes incarceration in the prison of the county where the offence is com- mitted, The Deputy Attorney General for Cumber- land county appeared in behalf of the Commonwealth, and Charles Gibbons, Esq., for the prisoners, Tho court decided to set aside the judgment of the court below, and yesterday thp koeppr af the penitentiary re. received a discharge for the prisoners, all of whom were enlarged.—Philade phia Ledger, June 7 © pri on any matters to be brought before them. duty of the presiding nire of the public health, and of ship-fever Cleared. Stark, Stark, London, J Griswold; Ore. Hameo, ER Stuneon & Coy GW Renda, ocd tee Ben r f dal, _ avon, Neemith te Walsh) Lady of the THN Hermida, Middleton & Co; Oreaola, arson ~phtan ‘Travers, Fredericksburg, I B Gaiger, Nor- Moiliator, jew lesmith & Walsh, 80} Maraniiam, &e. ayes Tattle, Provi. aL Ao mice of May, with sugar, to roles tsa ane eae aa NYu bat 4 niet Fe pee tea ae April 29th, wit unlett, MeNear, Cork, ithe and Sid'in with bot: Laurel tor NYuree ngers, to muster, and McConnell, for St Johns, NB, No date, Iat63 33 lon 230 ie bate Sun Janene scene : je if James MeDonall, Dunn, Dublin, 44 days, in? to Williams & Guion, 13th ult, lat 40, lon 44, spoke ir pois from Sunderland for NY ork. Brig Vandelir, Philbrook, Machias, 10 days, with lumber, to Ming alecbanie, K ‘ Big , Kelly, Machias, 10 days, with lumber, to master. Beig Eraucis, Sarin, Georgetown, 7 days, with timber and moss, to Thompson & Adams. Br sehr May Flowrr, King, Windsor, (NS.) Sehr Watelman, Jaincson, Thomasion, 8 days, with lime. Scur Freeman, {urton, Thomaston, 7 days, with lime. r Join, Sleeper, Thomaston, 6 days, with lime, Schr Vermilion, Sealey, Richmond, 2 days, with coal, neida, Collins, Virginia, 3 Sa with wood. ‘ato, Haw md, Ba timers, 5 days, with mdse, Seur Rochester, Fordiam, B: nore, # days, with coal. Sarali & Amelia, ‘I Philadelphia, 2 days, with eval, doling, Seeles. Philadelphia, 3 days, with o Tiomas Page, Prince, Puiladel, 3 days, with coal, Charter Oak, Suivh, Philade! phia, 2 days, with coal, Lady Clinton, Brown, Piiiadelphia, coal, Sebr Kiouite, Rotinsen, Wilmingiou, (NC,) 5 days. William Henry, days, with oil cloth. On Ban fe at t, 40m les fell in with the wreck of ulnaber To au the Wollvar of Wisinaea breriesuddehe ok Sehr Jane, Nelson, Cou’ ter, (Mo,) 10 days, with lumber. Schr Sailor Boy, Harton, Ssarie (Qle,) ae ss Bat one ing London, 2 a ree Schr J Cooley & Co, El Boston, 4 with mdse. Sehr Rio Gi Max, with fi 8 days, with mdse, of Segui e full of vale baa tt i Matilda, Wooster, Eastport 4 days, with lat Selit Maria, Miget, Washington, NC. Sdays, with eaval atores Schr LP Sinith, Foung, Washington, NC, O days, with meeal tores. Sloop Emily, Kirby, NBedf nl, with oil, Sloop Swallow, Wells, Greenport, 2 days, with oil, ‘Telegraph reports no vessels in sight from the Highlands, at sun set, Ships York, Apalachi romryt Ships York, Apalachicola; Lord Ashburton, (B + harks udustry, dor Joliordus, Babar liven base Giugeer ee ier van ; brigs Union, ( nelle; Josephine, M ran \: Oveer la, Tinston; Watehinan, Beruwuda; Br steamshy Iitvernin, Li srpool: va Haltthe, Passed dhe Narrows 10 v'cloek, Mf, ‘Saudy Hooke oN ocloel June 7—Wind, at Sunrise, NW; meridian, N; sunset, do. Pun artiereid, Marine Correspondence, HILADELPHIA, June 7th, Pr. MA! 1d —| Waiter, Matsa, Charleston, David Akt (new) token fae, ton; Star, Titeomb, Boston; Rufus Soule, Col dos pobre Metal Driseo, » York: Dindem, B ack, Boston; Gro, ian, Herrick, Nor Soa Flower, Dakex Baltimore; Gweneinms, kerry, NBedterd, Pardee Winall Naver: sureh Wiata Borkast pee 7 Daal Ker, Russell, ae 4 i R Jackin, Adaims, Wilmington, N rere leared—Larks Louiss, Barclay, Havana: Delaware. Fisher, irard, Chase, do; brigs ida, Wi Boston; Genl Taylor, Chase, do; Gi Jaryl, Shackford, Demerara; Emma, Baker, ‘beet ae Prince; A ostons rriet Sway ue, hion; Montoose, i} 5 Star. Titeomby Boston; “Tantslin, Matthews dee ane por es (ir) Fitzgerald, Windsor, NS; Columbia, Crowell, Richaonds Sar roth, rah Elizabeth, Somers, Pitivor; Di Parker, Ri 3 Williametta, Rogers, NLondon; Ji ler Bourne, FRGver; Mee Ann, Allen, Boston; Grecian, Herrick, do; Malabar, Drisevc. a D adem, Black, do; Thomas Page, Ga-kill, Poughkeepsie; Eme- line, Peterson, Hoffman, Alexau: i; Peter « lintou, Ji keepaig; Orion, Wass, Boston; Lydia, 8 Leis, Jordan, New Yooh targes Oneida tains, do: Philadel hi W Rambh Slattery, do: Northampton, Holmes, P Day yes, Brow! lyn; Neto, Tice, NYork; Erie, Norman, do; Convoy, Steeltana, d a - > hitomi ete ETTER Bas of steamship United States, fo ane iar, aud of the Gundaigulver, fe Havana, kettacteaed n'a, 1m the Exchange, and nt. the’ Telogra Extuange Blecs, om taterday momisg en Nee? ome 24 Srxansmip NoRTHERNER, arrived at Charleston, Tuesday morning. Scur Marnx, ofand from Bath for Boston, befe repo unk afver getting Into Scituate harbor, isan ld vessel and i ‘4d ta have aplit open, “Her cargo of wood has heen disshanged find sold, : Scun Gex Boxy, Hill, from Saco, with pine head Snow, went ashore on the West Bank, eee maraing ae eames T nasa went te, a pamstanee, ‘but the de, having fal- len she was uneble to tow her Jp to it have heard nothing from her. » 0 Ea ae ee Scun AvexAavpee, reported ashore ncar Beaufort, NC, a total wreck The cargo, it is said, will be saved. sikibadelend Brio Rictuonn Packs, frequently fallen in with abandon- i, waa ry in in lat 57 2), 1 fs 50, feet Doshess anteeton’ 7h coe “UHL OF yatey hy. the Brio NARRracvaces, at Boston, from Wilmington, aleak on the Sist, off Cape Fear it fi 3 wth ofa Fete eon Shae was ad Scur CHARLOT, of Boston, a vessel of about fifteen ti posed @ fishing vessel, was seen from Sandy Neck Tice 4 ve, late on the afternoon of 31st ult, to strike on the bar, fo ‘attempt. ing toentor Harnstable harbor. Mr Thos D P Buxter, Keepertof the Light, with his brother, made an attempt to go to'hor nasist Pitts ‘® bout, but were forced to desist on account of its blowing ad ale, and the weather was so bad they did ° tii the morting of 24. inst, They found the wreck Sith ret an chors out, masts alongside and otherwise much broken up. The anchors, cables, and some other ardeles, but oval no trace of two men who had been soon on boards "Et ta gald they got ashore at Dennis, but nothing definite is known of them jotice to Mariners. Marshall, rece and ie bow In dunt ie colied teens stacle to coming vessels that navignte that passaze day Vr vions to the lows of the schr A M, on the Handkerchi veasels had heen ashore on that Shoal in consequence of the Buoy. Yeing in the wrong place, It is dangerous that those wliose bust- ness it is to see to” the placing of buoys on Nentuckot Shoals, to sgtend to it immediatly, fur reasons obvious to all—[ Barnstable ratriot. At at New London, 24, ship Clematie, rat New London, 24, lip Clematis, Bailey, N W Coast, feces Islands and New Zealand, 1600 bbls Tia monet henix, at Nantucket, epoke Deo 1, Ni " 4 wig 150 bbls to befall “i iH hapemechorsiare int) . California, March 13, Bingham, of Mystic, 1 ndwich Islants; Prescott, Mallory, of do, full for Pog wt Bay of Issands, Feb 15, Calumel, Skinser, Ston 1200 wh for 3 ‘vast. ea, Island, Dee 21, (by letter) Levi Starbuck, Nye, Nan sp L@ wh Tue EL B Jenney, FH, before reported 24 from the Bonin Istands, and remained Fi Spoken. seStie Samuel Russel, Palmer, hence for Canton, June 3 lat 39 42, lon 69 iris supposed the Belfast, Jordan, from NYork, (about April 5 for San Francisco, Catiforvia, Aprit 21, lat 34, lon § ty a Weise vessel, and was reported the Melifante for Cephalornia, Ports. Gleaner, Smith, and Pilgrim, Bornham, Wlaneherd. Bangor, Sid 22, 4, St Petersburg: Isabela, Prebie, Ne (anila, ar there Jan 7. Foreign Havana, May 2—Arr bar Drinkwater, Boston harks er a Sears, for Hainburg, do; barks Ympira, Karon, do do: Ro Harton, for Cowen, 60: Amer can, Mosel; W T Wheaton, Martin, and Baltic, Allen, dc Fostor, for do, Mary Lowell, Flood, for Melcher; Bronte, ( Lenox, Howes; ‘i rt opler, Pearson, unc; Boston; Rival, Bell, une; vek, Frisbee, for Portland. Ski'28th, 1, NYork. ft ark Carmelitta, digg: bri tiago, hg fur NY« 1 le dis, with outwand ea at Agnadilla Bay, for Falnouth, for orders, MAuseittes, Say 1i—Ship Maryland. styers, for Boston, Trinivan pe Cuna, May I7-~Brigs Nainbow, Emery aud for Boston, 12 day's; Uniion, Mitebell, fos NYork, tig, Home Po ley, Dunbar, Tappahanno “k, t, Phi'a; Deumark, Woodbu: a Colohis, Arthur Valparaiso; barks Cl mic; Hebron, Hart, Havana; *arah Ann, Skolfi jo! bri Hall, St Thomas and mi “ do: brig Ponce, Coastwike, ‘ship Aleiope, Smith, N iiekerson, Philad; Alice tariton, Tobey, tine bark Lord Elgin, (Br) MeHardy, Lie ing si, rr Br brig Ranger, Paynter, K Port Maria, Ja. Cid, deh ile. At quara bark Raigho CHARLESTON, Sune Pp Sallivan, Waite, NYork; bark thew, M F Arrowsic, Morse, Bath, Me— hy telegrapl ortherner, uid, N Anrowy, June 4—Are brigs, Matepps, ol New York, Sleeper, NYork, for do; Billow, (Br) Beck: with, Bridgeport, for Windsor: schrs’ Metalino, Simonton, NYork for Pertsmouch; Peru, —, Philada for Boston; Margaret, Boned: man, and V =, do for do; Charlotte, Wieks, Fredericks: ith, in port, the above, , Coun, June 2—Are sche Thos P Cooper, Corson, Jack on, Philada for Actitas, June Arr Exemplo, Robins. NYork. a orig, Alphage Brown, Philad; schra are M Johnsoa, Hardy, and Matilda, Woostar, Bw Ontzase: May 20—CH steamship Portland, : Blanchard, “Blanchard, Liver ou ter, Boston; harks St Mary, Milliken, Boston; Cect'n, Soulard, New York: brig J Cohen, Hathora, Hoxton; Br eohr Commeres.” Par 4 ns, Balize, Honduras: sehr Relampago, Lentz, Frontaro, Mex.— Are ship Nestorian, Goodhue, 8 York; Br ship Gt 4m, Liverpoo!; ships Franconia, Beyle, Bi 8 SN York: Mindoo, Brown, Philadelphi 1, Cow, Boston; Larks Sa 1 Webster, Higging, 8 York: ioola; Wrig Vera Smith, New York; Phitidelphia; Da- attra AAT roax, Wilson, P ‘A Be oub, Baltimore; Gsear Jones, C eo; Gow Beaten, now, Dora, tio foneacra: Atice Elita, dee 01 Hick, dinnd MoNell, Rey West; € 0 K ser, Alfson, Pens: Trufant do; Martha, Cozzems, Jommodbre Holl, Jas Dy bil ‘Towboats Daniel Webster towed to sea 22d instant, ships American, Gen Parkhi!l, and «-hr Eagle; Miasirsippi towed to sea a, N a ‘Mortin aud john; sehra Caledonia, towed ti bth Tat hark tame: cham, Lydin, and sehr Sarah Churobman.-- nown, S—Arr brig Cocitia, Deapsr, Mobile, seh ‘ork for Bo sf a —Arr sche Geo Was)ington, Winslow, jary & Muvlen, Miles, Philada; 4th, RB yatic, d Naxrucksr, June Philad. Sd, std sohys Smith. Rorinson, do. New Bepvorn, June 5—Are sche Nile Bourne, Balt, june S—Are sehr Caroline Hell, bi 1, Philad, PortLann, dune 5—Arr bark Knight, Sawyer, Philaday ies A tlantie; and Naney Millis, NYork; eld brig Rodnay, Rogers, Georgetown, 8C, Eprvron, NC, June $—SM cohr A C Havens, Barrott, NYork. ne 3—Arr echrs Elias HW Herrick, Brown, NYork; Willig, NYork. Cll sehr Crescent, Fre ig 7M Williams, Washburn, Maya York, , Inne 7—Arr brig Importer, Marsh, Trividad de Hine & Rosina, Williams, Albany; Jos Lybrand, Fuller, Boston, i York; R <Are wohry Manchester, Tuttle, ‘Thompson, Copign, NY¥o.k, ™ Passongers Sailed. LivenrootSteamship Libernia—Mr and Mee Albrichs, New. York, Miss Sehinraht, Tyinid: Mr A Conrado, lady and servant, do, Mrand Mra Dunoan, N Orloans, Mrs Lowden, Mr Gignour, N York, Mr F Chagonrnis, do, Mr Henry White, Baltimore, John ¥ Rot 1 Mr Yoon ¢ Tons Mr Bullock, Nelfast, Mr MA Wic! Mon- ‘Claremont, do, Mr E 8 Jean Renaud, New Yor! ir James § Riley, Liverpool. Mr \ Dommartin, Paria, Agrado, I na Mr Wm I Lyon, N York, HC DeRtham, do, Edward Wioncke, de, Wm Leyh Oelrichs, N York, Wm Shaner, do, John Clark, hin, Ireland, John O'Shaughlesy, do, Mr Coch: son, Montreal T Karon, Ireland, James 7 Simi Seotiand, John 3 Fada Gutirrett, Havana, GHC Johnson, Halifax, Halifax, Me 0. MrA ri w, Me Passengers Arrived, Maranzas—Dark § L, Crowell—Mr Bishop, Me Lonlding, Me ir Bas and | Miss Sears, Miss Knight, Misa MoCul- Vedder, Miss Owonn,