The New York Herald Newspaper, June 2, 1844, Page 1

THE NEW YORK HERALD. Vol, X,, Wa, 194—-Whote No, 3794, NEW YORK, SUNDAY MORNING, JUNE 2, 1844. poms 0 —— THE BECOND EPISTLE “Twe Native American Paxrr.’—~‘t Several of our subscribers have inumated a wish that, inas- understunding the true interests and honor of your reli- | nal, to which the honored man, who w: ion better than its oficial advoeates, you pric nen with | Congress of Independence said th) pig ee triek of the friends of the Publie. School Society, | And eo long as he thus conducted the agitation, Bi- on discovering that without trick, falsehood and shop Hughes received no censure from us. We or much as this party profess a special hostility towards | misrepresentation were no match for truth, was to} might baye differed with him; but we should in-|} honorable indignatio ueed ever appeal 1 vein; nemely, public opinion as it BISHOP HUGHES, foreigners, we should devote some portion of our | allow, as far as possible, no one to be elected, ex-| deed, have merited the full vinls of his wrath, and Non talibus, ausiliie, non defensoribus istis saletanmong the american peuple. |} ask no yori de space to a refutation of their calumnies and eoekie sens such as should first band themselves to deny | that of all men, had we denounced him, or iater- Cuarten EXIV, mest, sad 2 that one ol Eepiucice halt AGAINST resentations. To those who thiok so, we would | redress forthe grievance complained of—no mat-| tered with him, so long as he kept in his own| The Bishop shows what an awful fellow Bennett ie—Lus Mageerein indarsepa. Anew he ink, ‘hat JAMES GORDON BENNETT, pay, thatthe object and the principle of our journal | ter how just or how real that grievance might be. | spnece, and within his legitumate limite, us the reli- docan't shaw who is the asscasin. at this moment, and without presumption 1 might ) | forbid us taking up any question of local politics :— Cuarrea XVIL gious guardian of his peopie. But trom the very] But how, sir, could you have so far forgotten what was | be allowed to appeal to conductors of the publ ADDRESSED TO and that the very nature of the case renders it eu- RS. STONE PerEEn wick We anthony thetmelven a et be . 1 * set: . re OLD M : Letts 4 he jadividaal composing t! ia party bave beeen aed a political right to associate, appoint officers, make CONCLUDED. spepcls designate candidutes, and elect them if Cusrtsa X they sen. ig be true they EA Boel right to employ falsehoods in their speeches forthe purpose antes sunntacen on soll seniehls digecver # | of Tacreasing their ‘number, or of iadamtog the or ‘og ue discover the name of the as- fable etal But Wile victasiots of ticket right must erie : , e met by the exercise of moral duty, on our Before I enter into the detail of Bennett’s abuse, { | —:hat Hg fateneee ‘and aaxbopel eaatiie ado? shall class under two or three general heads, the | ment. We would even caution all who may be allegations which he has made against me. Jf| influenced by ouropinion, against any act unworthy these allegations were true, I should think it not} o¢ the high character, which foreigners, only natural, but aiso reasonable and just that the | generally, by their good and peaceful conduct, American people should regard me aa an ill dis-|fave acquired in the minds of the respectable posed and evil minded person. One is, that L have | portion of the community No greater injury could organized my flock into a combination separate | be inflicted on the interests of foreigners—no great- from, and adverse to, the principles of the country | er disgrace could be affixed on their character~- to which they belong, and to which alone, they| than if they allowed themselves to be provoked can look for protection. Another is—that 1 am, | into any act, inconsistent with the laws and good somehow or other, leagued with O'Connell in pro- | order of society. This remark is particularly ap- moting two questions, one of which, though inter-| plicable to Catholics; for, it is quite evident that esting to every man that loves human rights aud | not foreigners in general, but Catholics, in particu- human freedom, is still, so far as ita results are lar, are the objecis of the hatred of this spurious due to the memory of that day, as to receive the testimo- | press, to do me according to their own sense of right, ny-not of & Protestant ike Maria Monk, but of a Roman | simple justice in the premises. Man, of them Catholic editor,” es you bad the cruelty to call him in| been misled, and, without intending it, have done ma your paper of the auth day of Ootober, 1641. It yeu had | inj . f bave had no resnement, hecsuse I given Bennett's statement without the endorsement | have not considered this as wilful or deliberute on of your own ;espectable name, his character would | their part. But if the time has come, when circumstences huve been an untidote to the poison which he cir-! have compelled me to meat my detractors, ie it too much culates; and the deplorable resulis which since fol-] to expect that they will record the sentence which their lowed would in all probability never have occurred, | feelings of hovor and sense of justice may dictate? Is it But I shall not press this tmatter on your stten- | too much to expect this even of*Native Americans™ if tion, at the present time. In fact, from what I read o1 him | they are worthy of the proud title of whieh they boast, but in yourown paper and other respectable journals, 1 sup- | which, in order to continue a proud title, must be sum pose that their editors would not have been willing tohave | tained by magnonimous feelings and honorable virtues, placed the slightest confidence in him in regard to any | Allow mo again, sir, in corolusion, to quote the matter involving truth and honor. Aad yet what was my | ple of morsl philosophy lad down at the bead of the let- astonishment in bebolding him converted under your pen | (er bamuly—that there ie nothing more powerful than into a Roman Catholic editor,” and his testimony re | Falsehood, except Truth wone, ‘The whole of this letter, ceived by you,asit you regarded it with habitual conf. 1 think, establishes the soundness of this principle, Itis dence. ‘The man himself | have never seen, but my opin. | fullof egotism I know, Butt professes tu beso. It pro ion of him had been already turmed by two circumatances | ferses to treat of Bishop Hiughes—tho assnilud of @ thou. which, for my, were quite enougn. One was that he waa | sandjcolumniators, und of James Gordon Bennett—the fine underetood--in Philadelphia, | think, to have published | und persevering chic! of thowe assailants. The principles private and confidential letters another war that ho repretentad ovine ope side, and on the other, have both seemed to deny and repudiate his country and hie coun- | triamphed; the one ia the just but imperfect provision of trymen, The first is the only service he could render to } the Legislature of New York, in extuading the blesings the land of Bruce and Wallace: aud for the second, there | of educetion to the cbiaren of thie city; thle wea the trie ix another reason, no doubt, wnich hie countrymen can} umphof Truth. ‘The other has triumphed also, under the explain. It svems, however, that though born in Scot. | wuspices of Mr. Bennett, und bis colleagues, vod (alas for land, he makes a good “ Native American.” He says: the honor of our country!) nay be read in guilt letters on ne’s : i moment, when he first departed from the piace iipbipoyns apo Np ge bprtf ear horn geciry of a Christian Bishop, and Rrewad the Gicecoraie pee pote gp ge pi ficyr orca ing to say L06— | Weanon of a mere political gludiater, trom that mo- Thi ment he became amenable to the censure of pub- . Then, it was on the very eve of the elec} lic opinion, and from that moment we denounced meeting in Carrol} Hall on the | him.”—Bennett, May 25th, 1844. reptoa Question, when the knowledge of this} Now, sir, in order to prepare tor experiment No. tnck broke upon us, 1 expressed the. sen-/2, I beg you to bear in mind that things were timents which I still stand by, whether rightly | exactly in the situation here described, when Ben- reported or not, ag they are found in the Free~| new wrote the following attack—published before man’s Jouraal, but not es they are adorned with | the meeting at Carroll Hall the waving of shiek in Bennett yes eee No. 2%. nett says that the two reports are ‘* werd tor wor “ op Hi 0 trol “verbatim et li eratim the same.” Bennett knew | ple grt ee hughes, Agua the) higtiso somes', hid he wrote this oa week see he was writing | tal kitchen gardener once on a day,) became a he “9 was br ces lay ¢ public know that | raiser of Catholica and Christians, he the sale rece i My spent at Carroll Hall was not} inerit of originating this emall potatoe question. — je speech of a politician. It was the speech of a| Te started the project a few years ago, in humble man who has some reverence for the dignity of hu-| jmiration of Danie! O'Connell and the ‘rint—one mes paws Tt was the seed of an Amencan | of {13 purposes being to organize the Irish Catholics who knows and prizes the rights secured by the | of New York as a distinct party,that could be given American Constitution, which he would not wish | 9 the Whigs or Loco Focos ‘at the wave of his to see violated in any denomination of Christians } eyozier”—Beunett, 29th Oct. 1841. more than in his own, Read that speech aait 18!“ jjo you see any Jerking here again? Do you see in the Freeman’s Journal. Is there any appeal 10 any new mark on Bennett's forehead branded by foreigners—to lrish—to Cutholice—to poliucians— | his own hand? concerned, a foreign question, namely—Kepeal!| nativeism. We would urge, then emphatically on | OF {0 any clays of beings, except so far asa prin-|" 4; Il: c the ruined walls of St. August ‘The other a question era delicacy and dif-| Catholics, to bear themselves in all respects, in a | Ciple of clear indisputable right and justice, could) « co . ; RARE RNY “Tas Loup Suetu.” ficulty, invol v0 consequences of isles peer manner which will prove them worthy of the pri- | be an appeal to the understanding and the heart of i iere 18 one charge, oN ere abreast The only chapter wecth seadinn ts the sptstlernbut tt don't T remain, sir, respectfully, Naw. T shell per pital a Ma je rtd vileges and righta which they enjoy, Many every honest man ? cious that we must notice itto-day. Thecharge is,] «+ why,’ asked my friend, ‘don't you go among your yout OHN HUGHES RECE Deettotdl’ aqapsitick lathes dintina clap i probsbly join this party who are really friends of Cuarten XVII. that we once attacked Mrs. Daniel O'Connell, the} countryisen oftener}” Do you mesa the Scotch. aald | Bishop of New York, ring organized my flock into a loreignera; but who for the moment, will coalesce | The Bishop continues to be very much bothered abowt “that” | venerable and pious wite of Daniel himseif, and | ‘Ido,’ vaid he. ' Then [i teil you the reason~-they are a ° , it vi . 5 y y nd still hold the their civil relations, { have held, doctrines of David Hale, and the ‘* Native Ameri- cans” on that subject. And first with regard to or- Sanizing my flock into a separate class. with their enemies, to accomplish some local pur- pose, of which foreigners constitute no part. ‘The true issue is for the loaves and fishes of office; and as but a small share of there, if any, falls to the that this was the cause of the brutal treatment which we received from the celebrated O’Connell when we visited the Corn Exchange in Dublin. This is, indeed, a piece of information which has com- a d scaly set, from top to bottom, and when I pass Supreme Court. them in the street I always take the windward side, and ‘ avoid shaking hands as T would avoid the itch.” Hai lie! | tas” have ese Tce a pa cieuivered in thie Court ha'--ho!ho! ho! *No sir,’ continued 1, ‘my friends are | he Court adjourned ove: ie by the with interest. the ‘Natives.’ Dll stick to the Natives--a fig for the Saree cree suse 14, report, and gets hysterical at last, und indeed, he won't telb the name of the assassin. Turn now, sir, I pray you, after having read this blasting refutation of Bennett’a last falsehood, to Crarrzn XI. lot of foreigners, so, notwithstanding the abuse of } the nin~ propositions laid down in my last letter as| pletely astounded us, We never dreamt of such | scotch?” Mar Trnss, 1044. ‘The Bishop uncorke an old bottle of Hughes’ Cordiol—but | their name, they may consider themselves aa) facts, If those facts are true, 1 ask you whether] an uccusation, as may surely be well believed, Crarren XXVI. Granted—Costs abide Event—Sack et ‘won't uncerk the name of the assassin. scarcely interested in the quarrel. The true issue | there is a man among us who can present himself} when we never wrote a syllable, or uttered a word, the dg-orinet. voit in 5 poet Byes 95 4 ot CH Beont at ele fon, i sa @ ; Herrington vi itford 5 is between natives and natives; and there let it re- main. The part which foreigners should take will be to side with, and support those who, besides versonal work, profess to carry out the fair and iberal provisions of the constitution and Jawa of the county. 4 “Those who will baye read these remarks will find in them a mufficient explanation of the reason why we have wasted go | ule ot our epace with the question of Nave Americanism.” y These, as far us 1 can recolleot, are the doctrines for the pretended violation of which, I have beea so falsely and injuriously assailed by Mr. Hule and the “Native Amerieaas.” And yet this article, published editorially in the Freeman’s Journal, as nlready described, is from the pen of Bishop Hughes, who 1s represented as orgamszing hia people into a separate clase!!! Again. look at another news- paper called the Truth Teller, over which | have no control, published January 6:h, 1844, under the tise of * The Press of New York,’ and you will fiad in an article of nearly a column’slength, the following passage which expresses the spirit of the whole. “Now, we are satisfied that If it be necestary to speak of a portion of the community as rorsiaxens, at all, their true gourse here, and so far as this place iy concerned, elsewhere, too, is to enter into no discussion with those persons who distinguished themselves in the manner we bave just referred to. In this country, speech, like opin- ion, is free; and if this party so called should persevere in ious spirit ef its denunciations, it will fiud ita in the arguments which might be rt of the assailed, but in the dearer self. The Bishop reads the polite literatu ¢ Gell tha name of the assaain. ; Blodget va Clemons; Luce eds Ido not know at what period Bennett wrote this, but 1} Burkle et al; Countryman ads Rider ; Overseers of Poor had sivequs recollection of itin my own mind, which is] of ‘Town of Hilion va Ely ; Brown et al, ade Paddock 5 confirmed by the quotation here given, and which mey be Walrath ; Simeet al, ads Davis; Willi found in the Life and Writings of James Gordon Ben- Havens et’ sl, ve Vanderburgh ; Moory ve nett,” page 8. al, ods Oswege Bunk ; Lowndes Cmarten XXVII. ada Root} Hotchkiss et ‘al, ude Suydam; Spencer ada The Bishop cat-hawls his own back, but won't tell the name | Grillin et al; Height ads Firm ; Seymour et al ade We- of ‘the assassin. ters; Ho: A ade Mead 5 Solisbury ya DicCoon et al; Phil} But it appoors that be ix not only a“ Native,” but thot | lige wie Vance et al Chandler vs Bunn; Bulger, et aly he has their principles-~ut ‘s0 far as the Bible is con- | 24% W+bb5 Betts ads Scott; the Proprietors of Common of cerned. You would suppose that if net brought up i, one meolnbete vs Horion 1. Wood aie Bruges, Jobaage ale of our public schools himself, he would recommend the | ove prciey OF, al; Sie vcnnean | Weaver San suctee systein 1 thoxe schools by its resulta in his own condnct J Hilly er et ai, iuds Mubony et al; Lowry ve Sutheriand 5 Je says: * | was educated ‘ict Catholic, ) Small ads theHerkimer Mapufacturing Company ; Lowry but it Was an enlightened Catholic too. M. ve Hull; Strader va Pairib; Long Island Meliroad Com ny boyish dsys, tras the Bible-King’0s pany va Marquand ot al ; Ure ads Kelly ot a; Van Rous Protestant Bible. Yet I never found that the reading of | *¢/#er, Eresidunt, Ke, adu Ugdensbuigh Bank, Hine ade that Bible at school ever left any bad effects behind. On | Fors, Wheeler ads Seaman 5 Barker va McCullough 5 the contrary, it left good effects. It filled the young mind | Sendtord rhea Barker ude Cleare with the glorious imuges, the classic Janguage, the noble | New hlgg Denivd—Whitmore ads Hand; Hend ve ideas, and the ever-living principles of true religion trom | Whitmore; Harvey va Decker; Sucket et et al aida Rents; its upper fountaias, ‘There can be uo harm to 2 good, | £¢ Mayor. ke. of New York ade Bailey et al + Hull ade moral, liberal, intelligent Catholic in having the Bib Stephens; Blodget va Wadhoms ; Lowere va Van Ben- yes, even the Protestunt Bible, in school ‘The Bible thuysen; Wheererads McKnight ; Paschal et a), va Mil Bible in every language ‘every translation—in lor 5 House vs Wagner; Averil et al, ads Paddock ; Care church—in every sect. Bishop Hnghes committed a most | Pane! va Town ; Albany Exchange Bank ve Sege; Heart fatal mistake ever to raise that litle, narrow, biggotted | 1, The Mechanics?’ and Farmers’ Bok Goodrich va question about different translations Defore the Christiag | BOARS 5 2 he People vs Rundle ; Sharp ct ul, vs Brandons and intelligent community.”—Bennett, April 19, 1344 Bardin ads Crocker ; Bacon et al, ads Albany City Beok 5 What could Mr, Hiram Ketchum, himself, say more than | Sune ba pease | Dill ada Rogera ; Colt ads Nowlen 5 thie? And if Bennett be an example of the moral effecis | Wore nas B ichards et al Richards vs Griswold ; Sher of auch training, what stronger reason can we have for | Hl! vs Benedict et al, Robertson, Sheriff, vs Pardee ; Bro~ making ite aloption universal in our public schools? | therson et al, va Jones; Bell va Potter; ieee 4 fy ; ' Power ; Lamoreux ad Stevens ; Helmer vs Hilton ; Feeepraeiding ear nerd particular translations, | 4.45 Cook ; Trustees ofvillage of Sandy Hill ade Hunter er even thought of Mrs, O'Connell in the whole course of our life. The entire falsiiy—the utter impossibility of our having written or printed a line against Mra O'Connell is at once apparent, when it is known that Sno be fast twenty years that | have-been connected with the press in this coun- try—nearly one half of which period, as proprietor a-d conductor of the New York Herald, up to the affair in the Corn Exchange, in every re- terence to O'Connell, { expressed admira- tion of the man, and column after column have I written defending him, and even at tempting to apologize for his attacks on the Southern institutions of this country. Attack Mrs O’Connell! A more daring and deliberate false tiood than this never proceeded trom the Father of Lies. I cast itback on Bishop Hughes with ail the burning indignation which can be imagined in one 80 grossly asaailed—one who never even by impli- cation, attacked any female in any mode or shape vhatever. Thus much on that point.’”—Bennet, May 21, 1844. ; Experiment No. 3. “We would advise O'Connell not to make the tour of the United Sjates, for the sake of his nu- reérous children and concubines, who might be left fatherlesa and comfortless. Will our readers be- lieve that this same moral rascal, O’Connell, once made a public boast that he never spared a man in his anger or a woman in his lust. His wife ence i order to shame this scoundrel, collected together six young women whom he had seduced, and em- at the bar of a just and honorable public opinion, in & more unexceptionable character, as a citizen, as a Christian pastor, than I do in repelling the excess of scurrilous abuse and calumny which haa been heaped upon me? But if those proposisions are not true, again I say—‘‘ Now, therefore, James Gordon Bennett, Wim. L. Sione, and ye other de- caivere of the public, stand forth and meet Bishop ughes. Atew words more and I shall close with whet appertains tomy own vindication. in my letter to his Honor the Mayor, I stated as follows in reference to the meeting at Carroll Hall. “But there was a reporter of Venueti’s there, who made such a speech aa he thought proper— which was afterwards, ag I have reason to believe, fined up for the purpose of producing one of Ben- nett’ ‘ tremendous excitements ” and making the “ Herold always the first and moat enterprising pa- per in New York.” Having taken this report, hav- ing studded it with the gems of his own ribaldry, and made some balfa column of editorial commente, in all thatmock cary ot which Bennett is capabl the Herald of the next morning became the b and fountain of all the vituperation, calumny and slander which have been heaped on ‘ Bishop Hughes” throughout the United states, from that day until this.” All this waa from memory, and I apologized by anticipation, if in questions of memory I had made any mistake. In his attempt to reply to this, on the 25th, he states that the whole ‘question turns Let the reader refer to the Freeman’a Journal of November lth, 1848, and he will find an_ article under the head of “Insulting Appeals of Politi- cians,” {rom which the following passages are ex- tracts. “We should have thought that the Catholic citi- zens ot this State, had arrived at such a period of intellectual maturity, as would enable them to see the despicable artifice of those who, on the eve of an election, appeal to them ae ‘Adopted Citizens.” ‘We should huve thought, moreover, that by this time, they had acquired spirit, and self respect enough to spurn such appeals ina manner that should rebuke and disappoint the calculations of their despicable authors. ‘Adopted Citizens’ can have no interest opposed to, or apart from, those which engage the attention of the people at large, and should feel themselves insulted, when they are appealed to, as if constituting a distinct and feparate class. Even in this city such things have so often been attempted with supposed success, by their friends, that their enemies too, have availed themselves of the practice. On the day of the election, sTuesday last, they were called upon through the medium of pace: head- ed with a large black cross (for nothing 18 too sa- cred for these men,) to vote for a particular candi- date, and this was done with the direct intention of accomplishing his defeat. We know not who was the author of this ‘ingenious device.’ We know indeed, that last year, Col. Stone published, with all the notes of horror which such a epectacle urged on pal gould excite in the breast of a pious editor as he | interest of those who foresee that their pros will be | on the accuracy of the report ulone.. This is false. | ployed them about his houso in various menial ca- : is, a simil:r exhibition of a P black cross,’ pur-] blighted by its shceead, if > but they ‘fare fled I gaid the “Herald of the next morning,” including ities. Yet this heartless, unprincipled, coward- Cwarrra XXVIIL igeand Wite i Sitter eds Hit wood Wateddars a porting be a placard trom the Catholics, whilst he | hitherto in exciting any thing ike opposition on the part | both the report and the editorial comments, made 8 wretch, has the unblushing effrontery,” Wc.—| he Bishop takes some physic with a very bad grace—and | ade Drown ; Vandenburgh ads Botsford ; Lawrence eda must have known that the whole forgery was the English, opie sooth eitizuns, have condeacended either to | With the mock gravity which he sometimes put | Bennett's Herald, Vol. iv. No. 130. won't tell the name af the aaaussin. Phe Butchery’ und Drovers’ Bank ; Sheridan vs Smith et "This is perhaps one of thu most interesting experiments of the whole; andthe phenomena of Galvanism can ex- hibit nothing like it. You see that In oppositionto his own will, he has fixed the first brand on his own forehead in reference to Mrs O'Connell. And now J want to see whether the moral influence of truth willnot compel him to Ax another crosswise in reference to the saine subject. “To my great surprise and astonishment, (he says) these remarke were of an offensive character, and such as it never could have entered into my mind to conceive oe I knew nothing of them wifatever, till Tread them in my own paper the next morning. 1 was, indeed, exceedingly cha- grined atthe time, and remonstrated severely with the gentleman who wrote them.” (The gentleman who wrote them !)—Bennett, May 23, ISt4. _ Now see whether the phenomenon of a cross-brand is to be realized according to my theory of truth, “Every editorial apticle which appears jn the Herald, is written in this ofice—by whom it mat- ters not; but ail writter there under the contre! oie of one mind.” —Bennett, Jan. , 1S44. in the following experiment, I shall make Bennett, for the entertainment of the spectators, go through another compound movement of this kind, whic jot but prove very interesting In the first place, in order to understand the question, be invents a mesting of ‘Native American ;” composes speeches for them; and, ax if his intention were to direct any mob that might afterwards arise, to the burning ot our Churches, be publishes in one of these speeches, that there are dungewns under St. Patrick’s Cathedral, which can be intended fur no other purpose than the im- prisonment and torture of tue Protestant ministers of the city, when the Catholics should gain the ascendency.” In reference to this subject,he says a few days afterwards: “The Express of this city—a most miserable concern, work of his colleagues, if not his own.” This has reference to a politicalrecommendation by persons signing themselves * Trustees of Christ Church’ —a Catholic church, at Sandy Hill in this State.— The article in the Freeman’s Journal goes on to review an opposite recommendation by other individuals—and speaks thue: ‘This counter recommendation is signed first ‘ Thomas Keneler, Lieutenant of the Irish Greens,’ which shows that if its signers had titles, they would not hesitate to make use of them, especially if they, were likely to have any weight onthe supposed stupidity of ‘ adopt- ed citizens.’ Then follows a list of ia two nemes, among which the O’Connors and O’Neils and O’Keefes stand out conspicuous. These be it known are members of the congregation of Christ church, Sandy Hill ; and their indignation does not break forth at the insult which is put upon them as ‘adopted citizens’ and ‘Catholics,’ and which they put upon themselves, but is directed against their opponents for having signed themselves* Trus- tees!’ Really the contempt in which they are held by those who address them with such Avie is weil merited. When they present themselves as ‘Trustees’ or as ‘adopted citizens’ or as ‘* Cath- olics,’ to do the low electioneering of political as pirants, on the eve of an election, they deserve ne- ver to be rated higher than they are by those who employ these appeals—that is, as men without com- moa inelligence or self respect.” i Abating the mixture of contemptuous epithets end insult, who would not, suppose that this lan- guage is copied from an editorial of David Hale or from a speech of the “Native Americans.” Yet, the reader will be astonished to learn that these ex- on, in derision of mankind. So that here is falee- hood both in altering and in suppressing truth, In that editorial, headed wiih flaming letters, he an- nounced a new and extraordinary movement— mixture of Couns and religion—he makes the clergy as well as myself speakers, &c. Now,none of the Catholic clergy took any part in the proceed- ings whatever, nor have they in the discussion of the School Question, with one or two solitary exceptions. Neither was there any mixture of politics and religion that I am aware of, except what is found 19 every assemblage of men who have some idea of religion and of politics, with- out the slightest consciousness of any necessary “mixture.” Words of this kind—written malici- ously—read hastily—sent forth at a time of great party excitement—canght up according to the hue and tone of the passions—commented on as they have been, became unquestionably the fountain and basis, of all the vituperation that has been heaped on me throughout the United States from that day until this, After what1have said already, the truth of one word of which, not even Bennett will dare to deny, I ask you ponder on the direc- tion given to the public mind by this article—and I think -you will see that, by necessity, this man prr- vertstruth in the spirit of the orticle—he perverts itin the adjective—he perverts it in the noun—in the preposition—he perverts it in what he says, aud so far asthe moral effect is concerned, he perverts tt in what he suppresses. But I cannot spare time tor the migute exposure of his atrocities on my character. Bennett has pretended that hia ossaults on meof which | “ts North ve Pawling & Co; Muin vs Ramsey et ol; I have two or ¢hree dozen atill im reserve, were made iu | House vs Loomis ; Fellows et al vs Prentite ; Hall et al, consequence of my conduct at Carroll Hall, and then only | ¥# Dean ¢ weg Ns Bovee et al. Lawyer ede Wright forthe public good ‘This ia entirely false’ His grosses ue gment Atiirmed.—Taylor et al, ve Adams Aberif's assanite were made belore the oacurrence ut Carrol! {luli | Lee, et al. vs. Salter, et al; Stevens vs. Wilson et el; Han- took place. Until then, even by | cock et ai ve Dunbansl et al; Bukewell et al vs Ellsworth done nothing to authorize hia assau ot | etal; Bowne et al vs Metion et ai; The People ve Cady; public good. Yet, my admitted innocence did not protect } Sane va byes Kilbourne vo Favil; Reynolds me, But why should I speak of mysel(? Is there acler | Derry; Badgley et al ve Ono gymanof any denomination whom be has spared | My | ier & al Ki Fengeh, eh amiable a sai predecessor, even at the age of “70 years aM er ads Black; Wood vs Warner; Kinnie ve Avery et and upwards,” could uot be allowed to escap al; Ketcham vs Barlow; Stoddard vs Sloote; on et al ‘Bishop Dabois. is not a patriarch; he ot effect | ¥8 Lyon; Heaton vs Raton; Sima ve Hibbird; Graves ve reforma by his example, or by his pasioral advice und gu | Hackley, Rutter ve Osgoed; Dodge va Rush; Casler et ak vernment. No,no He is doing Cutholicity a service as | ¥* Kusbeck; Chambers va Halsted; Hinsdale va White; the devil did Joba sorvice—by his want ol all example-- | 2bet man Jr vw Carpenter; Tucker va Ives; Brown va by his entire misgoveroment—by his capricious smi ri | The Butchers end Drovers Bank; The Richmond Turn- dieulous tyranny. * * * * ‘The conduct of Bishop | Pike Co. vs Peter Aupel. Dubois has long given great offence to the Catholics Motion to set uside—Report of Referees denied—Corell Capricious, tyrannical, heartless, old womauish and aly. | ¥* Jones; Austin receiver va Palmer; Thompson et surd, be has reduced, end ia rejucing the standard of | Gibron et al; Many vs Averill, Same va Judeon; Same vs Catholicity to a standard thet would make Maria Monk } $ame, Rout et al va ads Bank of Utica; Loomis et al va pity it, and Dr. Brownlee say prayers for its salety”— Baker, jr, Chenango Mutual Insurance Co ads Hogan; Bennett, Sept. 9th, 1836, Same ads Space; Foster Newland; Onterio end 8. ‘Wazs it for the public good that such a foul attack was Lawrence Steamboat Coy etc of Mt. Joh mado on 6n amiabla and aged clergyman, Whosaage and | Fitzhugh et al vs Same; Staflord vs Bacon; Rich ade character should have shielded him? No, no. ‘There is | Wilcox, Bayeux vs Platt, Woods vs Wilcox. nothing of public good inthe question, And even as reef Re du—Conts ubide even! garda the Native American party, whatever its principle: J $1" et 2 were, I cannot believe that they breathed the spirit of ex. | chanics’ Mut termination which would eppenr from Bennett's reports of | © dC their proceedings. Wor instance describing the sensativn | #d* Mason produced by an appeal in one of their meetings, he has, | Judgment for Plaintiff on demurre (Loud applause; Cries of never; we'll die first, we'll ki | sel terms — Merrill, lrerident, &e the old Pope and +¥enY os BstONGING TO M14 Finet.)— | Farmers’ and Mechanics’ By Bennett's Herald, Nov. 25, 1843. il, ade Briggs + € artis Kingsbury ; Forbes ads Bigo- ‘as making the epirit which } low end al; Wondruffads Root; Vaiighn et al, ads Swifty r. itic probable be Utica and Schenectady Railroad Compa- aldry” just as the “#hillalahs” | 8y etal, ads The Commonwealth of Kentucky ; notice their Leia or in any manner to resent their insults. This is as it should be.” Cnarren XV. The considers the Rev. David Hale a most decided — but won't tell the name of the assassin. This article, too, is from the pen of Bishop Hughes, so famous according to the echoes of slander, for organizing his people into a separate class for (dear yurposes. These are the articles to which I alluded inmy last communication,when I remarked that “from a very early period, 1 pre- vented the only papers which affected to represent Catholic interests, from opposing either the princi- ples or the progrees of the new party. When the private interest or enterprize of ini ividuals urged them to establish new papers intended expressly to oppose the progress of *‘native Americanism,” and to uphold the consiitutional rights of foreigners of all religions, I peremptorily refused to give either patronage or approbation—foreseeing, as I imagined, to what point such antagonism must lead.” I know that the irresponsible editor of the Journal of Commerce rates me, as if 1 had ‘prevented’ or ‘caused to be published” these papers by an absolute authority, or by, physical force: It was not 60; but merely by the influence of moral means, such as a friend uses towards a friend, actuated by a desire for the peace, securu'y, and honor of society. And his reasoning is, that it is most dangerous to the community thatit should include one member, capable of anticipating and preventing the horrors which have occurred in another city! But [have already stated that I look upon the editor of the Journal of Commerce as mo- T have underlined the wor wtt ascribes to the me of the “gems of his Crapren XIX. The Bishop's mind wanders and he talks about gatvanism— traets are from an article written by—and exprese | tally irresponsible for what he says. hevhad hase eased dol wero at Carroll Hall. But on the other hand, is it not most | The Mechanics’ Bank in the city of New York vs. Russell; re . ™mome' ly says that nobody can touch | actually had the audacity yesterday to declare with spas be * hi Carpenter et al, ve. Van Arsdile ; H: nd ss the sentiments of—Bishop Hughes !—that man who Cuarten XVI James Gordon Bennett, but he don't tell the name of the as- | modic Vriggling v that all thie dsyedeck well « hoax, od dangerous to find him on the day preceeding thia, as it his p * pa Asse ig Pare vee im object were to urge on the thoughtless and the wicked to | 80057 ‘he Mechani bloodshed, circalating the following atrocious slander. Boardman ; Eradner, President, vs. Kelley ; Forbes et @! “We hear it whispered that the Irish Repeal Abolition | ada Duncan Exec, ists, who have been organized by BishopHughes and John | Judgment for Defendant on demurrer—leave to amend Mekeon, intend to make an attack upon the Young Amer | 0” usual terms—Griewold ads Mcintire et al; Bogerdus icans, and to drive them out of the Sixth."—Benneit, No | £xr ads Elder; Bennoit ode. Meech et al; Wilbur et al, vember 24th, 1843 ads, Chapman; Walsworth ads. Baldwin; Beardsley et al, ‘And all this, whilst he himself had borne testimony tc | ¥9 Wilteer. fs the peaceable conduct of the Irish, a8 the following pas Judgment for Plaintiff'—Castle et al. va. Mattheus sage will show t al; Smith vs, Argell et el: Raynor va. Wilton, Wil- "phe German populetion alone have raised a voici | merding v# Hart et is represented by Benneti—the editor of the Com- mercial Advertiger—the Journal of Commerce— the oratorsof the Native American party, and ma- ny of thegrave and reverend divines of our pulpits as organizing his flock into a distinct and separate class as “foreigners and Catholics! !” Cnarrer XII. The Bishop, although « Welshman, approves of Repale—but ‘won't tell the name of the assassin, sassin The examination of this question has impressed on my mind more deeply than ever the soundness of the quotation at the head of this letter. And 1 do believe that so far as regards the things of this world, falsehood would be “almighty” if it were not for truth alone. There are, eta, most cu- rious forces concealed and mingied with, the ele- ments of raaterial ‘nature. I do not speak of Mes- that all those speeches which are now, through our in- strumentality. circulating all over the country, as a hoax We can only say that the speakers thus ridiculed, and ro unceremogiously voted out of existence, could give the miserable creatures of the Express proofs of their identity—of their flesh and blood existence.-equally strik- ing and convincing as that which the honest countryman ave the philosopher who had very leurnedly argued in is hearing thet there was no such thing a8 motion.”— Bennett, Nov. 23, 1848. Here, you perceive, is the denial of the forgery. Now The Bishop snaps at Bennett—he snape at the Public School Society—he snaps at the Protestants —he sneps at the school- books—he anapy at every body—but won't let us enap at the name of the assassin. From all this it will be seen, not only that Ben- nett and his followers, have no facis whereby to establish their abuse of me, but, that I have abun- dant tacts to establish the truth of sentiments, of languege, and of conduct, directly the opposite o1 Asregards repeal in Ireland, the Bishop approves | those which they have charged upon me. I have merism—but I would just call your attention to the ago uita of this party, and strang Jadgment reversed —-Venire de Novo —-Cost ebite of it without qualification, and especially consider- | already published my sentiments in reference to an | phenomena that are produced by the action of n then for experiment No. 4: app who are Event—Stonts vs, Hodges et al; Holmes vs, Bristol; ing the moral and Christian sanction which apper- | [rish or Catholic organization, and to any political | galvanic battery. When its force is made to act} "And inorder to place tho whole plan of operations | first in thy feld, lie ws dormant ax terraping bi December.’ | Crane ve Petrio ; Albany and Wert Stockbridge R R. we eee teeans, that have hiherto been em. | di-tinction between adopted end native citizens.— | on a dead body, you perceive what a shocking mi- | before the new party and before the public, we got up ti | Bennett, October 24th, 1848 Shetms ps ut Cre ee famous “American Republican Meeting in Americen Ke- publican Hall, between Broadway and the Bowery,” which was a piece of imag sation, and intended to presvat in a practical and intelligible form the best mode of con ducting the new agitation ; the best plan of carrying on the canvass, and the topics which most properly invited the attention of the spenkera and lenders of the movement And this succeedud admirably. ‘The ground we thus pointed out, in @ practical, and, at the same time, # deli cate and unobtrusive manner, was taken by the leaders of the movement, and the ‘ation went on from that hour with spirit ano success, All the proccedlings of the party were reported accordingly by us, ¢nd the public in this way kept regularly informed of the views, the purposes, and the progress of the reform party It is true that the Express and otber papers binstered a good deal, and crird out forgery,” “forgery,” but that did not prevent our mode of presenting the irne, tenable ground of the ni party from producing the domred etfect.”—Hennett, Apri! W, 1644. The shedding of human blood, ond the burning down of Cetholic churches might be auticipated, ns the uxturel, (whether it was the desired,”) effect of such publications or not. And the wailing families and ruined temples of micry of life is produced. There are manifestations, ug it an artificial eoul had again acquired the maste- ry and dominion over the movement of jointa,sinews and muscles. Now it seems to me that J have discovered a latentprinciple somewhat analugous, in the power of truth. And if I can bring out the correctness of my theory, I hope to be ranked among the philosophers of the age—for whem | have w greater respect than for its politicians. 1 shall make my experiments on James Gordon Hen- gett. And in order that they may be fairly tried, it 1s essential that he should stand in the midat of 1 large ring of epectators—bui no one shall touch him. CmarrengXxX. Mutato nomine de te fodut the With repeal] have never had anything to do, ex- cept asa lookeron. On the question of Abvlision- ism, the same. But, as may be seen, when the name of Mr. O'Connell was employed as a charm to conyert his countrymen in the United States into Abolitionists, I did suggest to them, in my letter to tne Courier & Enguirer, that whatever might be their opinions on the subject,anything like dictation or advice from any foreignsource,onthatsubject wa to be met with rebuke and indignation. Ihave never attended or taken part ina political meeting or move- ment, in my life. Ihave never voted in my life ex- cept once. J have never made a political speech in iny life, avd Idare any one on earth to meet we in coutradiction of this statement. The Schoo! ques- ion is @ subject which can be explained in u tew words, The Catholice of New York, for sixteen vears, had been deprived of the benefiis.of the taxes which, in common with thrir fellow citizens, they had to pay for education. They had created & few free schools to supply, es well as might be, the 7 1 Guaras Fe Proceedings Keversed — Heustin et al. va. Smith 5 The Bishop says he aint a bit ofraid of Bennett—but won’ | People ex rei. Van Valkenburgh et al ve Parmele. tell the name of the assassin. Proceedings Atfirmed—People ex rel. Van How Materfals of this kind thicken eround me es Ladvancr | commissioners o! Highways of Stuyvesant ; Peop fa my subject ; but | shall give it up forthe present, out o! | rel, Wendall_ va Sampson. sheer disgust.” A free press is essential toa fies country | Judgment for Plaintiff on demurrer 98 of January Term And whilst we know thet tic ia insepurabl: | yast —Cheproan et el. vs. Fish trom freedoni, we must be prepared to h the evi Tudement Reversed—Stone vs. Cole forthe sake of the good. Ithink this lutter will tenct: | rey, Readher. Weller ot al sven Mr Bennett .t at editors huve dutica aa wells right | “Xiw Trial Granted - Fralich ad The People ; People va. imconducting a free (rues: the instrument whiel John Jones ads The People, they sbuse (py ‘licenty tes, alter all, the rari Quushed ; Elting et al. va Common Council moat powerfal and rigid tribunal at «hich to arraign them ea, for perverting it from its legitiinate wee. if Bennett har Trial public motives for ponring the torrent of bis slanders upon J jet 9272 ine forthe lant #ix years. 1 trust the same motives will jus [| whi ty me for vindicating myrelt, and for pointing vot th | py daygers to which every thing in U 5 exposed frum the unseruptlo of n free press, by aneditor without moral prin Some one will ask ine, Whether in writing as } have done T have not violated 2h that | have not Jadm!: thetif B ebority of (rab, in bie attacks upon ployed tor promoting it But I, sir, have never connected either my p-rson, My opinions, or my name with any association 'n Europe or Americ founded for the purpose of promoting even thatjhu- mane, juat and liberal object. Cuarren XIII The Biehop ie a little fidgetty about abolition—“ te it there you are, my darlin ?—yet he won's, no he won't, tect the name vf the aseasein. As regards Abolition, happily for me, I can refer to testimony which no one can suspect of being in voked or concocted for the occasion. In the month of Mareh, 1842, more than two years ago, I had oc casion to write a reply toa strange reterence by Col. Webb, editor of the ©. urier and Enquirer, on the subject ofan address which was circulated by the Abolitionists of this country—an address signed by O'Connell to his couatrymen in the United States. My opinion at that tirae was that the docu- ment was not authentic. [ have had reason since to alter my opinion, and to believe that the signa ve. Jamos ye. Haitt- | granted, costs nh de event unless plaintiff de in that event new trial denied ; Richmond eda, rgiment ordered ; De Bow nd w trial denied and pro “ ions to proceed and render Judgment 5 ec al je, unless Plaint tf deducts $967 66-—-in thet J; MeGuil ads Van Eppe Logs remitted to O. & T. of But no name yet of Of couree my battery is moral; and its ef- fects are to be produced on his will, and power over hia own motions. If the theory be sound, the spectators wi!l witness the following phenome- + rent evils resulting from tia priyation. The question When the f lied, J enother city can best declare v hether the means nad the ir ture of this great man had been solicited and ob- | °¥' ’ na. enever the force is applied, Mr. James y : k without their influ civty at J 4 4 ‘ now arises why Were they deprived of the right o! | G. e ve ¥ end have not been In true keeping with each other, But | tacks were ~ People. tained, under a false representation of the true state | 3W arises w Ay wine Mey Copies at iat question Gordon Bennett shall lose all, power over his | ote yerm you see by epplying the latent force of truch, | indved, 1 know that 1 should ting this of Error, and therefore no Decision ; Curbman own will; and in spite of himself, he will jerk his arms and impress on his forehead a certain combi nation of letters in which all thatis least honorable in the Englieh alphabet will be concentrated. la order that the experiment should be fairly tested, it_is necessary that he should look Truth “full in the face.” In this, be will find some difficulty, though he is accustomed to see ver well on either side of it. However, I shall shift it #8 circumstances may require—to meet the ‘*focus” of his vision. ‘I shall commence with one of the moat cruel things he ever said of me “We have never uttered a syllable against him as a private individual, On the contrery we have um- formly epoken of him as a man ef talent--of moet amiable character-~of piety~ot integrity-—of une Hut Bevnett has placed bimeell in vu! sition towards society, that if 1 were charitable community, | must seem to be uncharitable toward Just imagine, if you can, an incarnation of der *. Foster. Motion in arrest of Judgment denied ; Kipp ads. Du» bois et al. Judgment of Common Pleas reversed and that of Just placing itkelf on the highways of civilized society rang «tiene Mone wei Busha y Bmith po Bert 1; Boyt ind his hands Ay upezainet kis will, aud fix another melan forchead. As asmail sequel to alt ion that after having directed as far ntion and the passions of any mob that might be, against the Catholic © ter having fanned the embers of social division into a fame; after human blo of the qnestion as regards slavery in the United States. Here is an extract from my letter to Col ‘Webb published in the Courier and Enquirer. * * * * “should it (O’Connell’s signature) prove to be authentic, then J have no hesitation in declar- ing my opinion that it ie the duty of every natu- ralized Irishman to resist and repudiate the address with indigaation.” Not jedeonty because of the doctrines it contains, but because of their having emanated from a toreign source, and of their ten dency to operate on questions of domestic and national policy. I am no friend to slavery, but 1 am still less friendly to any attempt of foreign origin to abolish it. ‘ J The duties of naturalized Irishmen or others, 1 consider to be in no wise distinct or different from presents the jasue made in the whole controversy The Public School Society assigned as a reason that the Gatholiea were bigotted, and that their priests kept them apart from the other children, lest they should become eniightened, Americanized, aad, as a consequence, Protestants, a9 soon ae they grew up. The Catholics, on the other hand, de- ared thie; and alleged that the system of the Pub- lie School Society was adopted to meke the cbild- ren Protestants or infidels first, or simultaneously with education, Here is the controversy—on these twostatements. The Catholics alleged that the elementary books of the schoole put into the hands of their children, were calculated, if not intended, to poison their minds in reference to their religion, For months and years this was de- ing with prying fare ge the, Yh ire Fenton ; Clark vs, Auble ; Wilcox vs. Titus. official, commercial, social, aud domestic. life e-Just @ Traut tay foal ey gedit yak freebooter sweeps the ocoan horizon, with his telescope Be aie set aside—Coste abide event ‘beelor ad. looking for prey j-imegine that incarnation, rushing | Judgment on Demurrer for Defendants on first count, on its victim with some futal secret of guilt or misfor | yf) on 34 ond 4th Plens to 2d Count, and for Plaintiff on tune, (he wonnds of which might heal, if allowed the | 11 plea to a4 Count, leave to amend on usual terms.—Wi- natural privilege of shade silence ;) whispering tha’ | non et al. ads, Gilbert fatal secret with sardonic triumph into the ears oi | Nay trial denied, on Plnintiffy deducting $586 from ver- thon “who thought it was unknown, and then-wavine } gigt Lioyd ats, Worcester to and fro the scorpion lash of ite infernal whip, unt |S 4 + Plaintiffs deduetin teers or money, or botis,are made to gush forth bun | dew, Mel denied, oo finns ing $651 47 from dantly,--wnd thon you will have conceived my ol " ted on payment o' wok the powers that may be exercised by a bed man bav-|yathinestae phe pewtie ie bi having seen the earth crimaoned wil which ought to have been r country, and all this, ae Tt id, the natural desived effvet of his in it all, even now moral essays known wnder 1 Fables.” ‘There ia this difference, howeve Fables ¢ d to arson and bloodshed, ‘And the oni similarity omparison st i ly, according to the ancients, Ksop wae a beauty, and 10, [am told, is Mr, Bennett. Curren XXI. an discover equality with tide of Asopa Hine etal those of NativepAmericans. And if itbe proved an} y tiring zeal for hia church and creed.”~Beanett, ing the command of a free press. You say Bennett i hw trial eranted.—Angustua Hill ade. ca attempt has te tunde by this address, or any | ned by the Public School Society. That it was} May 21, 1844 The Bishop loves truth—adores truth—worships (ruth—eon | too contemptible for notice ;=then answer me the ques Haiauift’ st, Watron ; Nag te lag Hear a ape true—they themsrlves have at length had the can- Meer-about truth--but he den't tell the name of the | tion, Why vit that society sustains his paper 7 You suy he R Jiement reversed—venire de novo by N.Y, General Cuarten XXI. Alexander Hoag, impleaded, &. ‘vs. The The Bishop is a man of arnse, and shows that he reads the Herald—but he won't, that he won't, tell the name of the essaasin. ‘ow, eir, look out for experiment No. 1. “Bishop Hughes from having been a good gardi- ner, a raiser of cabbages and carrots, has become 4 Bishop of the Church, and new tends souls inatead ot eallads, but his original tastes still exist. fe is one of the most fawning sycopbanis to power that ever presided in the church-~and all thoee who have money and power, of any church, are hia polar stars. He wants all ranniiness and independence.”—Ben- nett, May 12, 1841. Did you observe any motion of the army? Can you trace the leiters? Now it is manifest that this reenlt is in spite of the volition of Bennett's will. It is the homage which falsehood pays to the ma, jesty of truth=aot by the appleation of external forcr—not by the free will ot the worshippere, but other address, to single them out on any question appertaining to the foreign or domestic policy of the United States, in any other capacity than that of the whole population, then it will be their duty to their country, and their congcience, to rebuke such anattempt, come from what foreign source it may, inthe most decided manner and language that common oourtesy will permit.” ‘These, sir, constitute my vindication from the infamous charges that have been preferred against me, whether from the press or from the pulpit. But beside these, ani beside the propositions cover- ing my whole character and conduct, laid down in my former letter to the Mayor, and which no man can impugn, with one conflicting fact, 1 have to add still other testimony, going to prove that 1 am not the man whom even the furious denuncia- tion of Native Americans represented me to be. Before the close of this communication you will have seen the ferocity with which I have been de- nounced, according to Bennett’s reports of their is too ontemptibie for notice, and why ix it that you are him, and that you would rather lose $1000 any incur his enmity-out ef regard, if not for your a stfor your little daughter who climbs on your ,, Court of Errors onnell expressed it in the poetry of hir Commenced its sittings on Saturday. No quormm g ne lan that in your bosom,”—koowing | being present, it was adjourned over to Mondsy. very well, 08 you do, that thotigh you fea ay ri — ed arrow” may be prepared for them, whea you You say that he is too contemy " le curiosity will 1 his paper #, whilst fe dor to to acknowledge, by blackening certain por- tions of their books, and this at their own motion, and not at any instance of mine. As an instance of thoge passages, I will quote, among others, the following :— “John Huss, a zealous reformer from feet who lived in Bohemia, towards the close of the fourteenth and the beginning of the fifteenth cen- turies. He was bold and persevering; but at length, trusting to thedeceitful Catholies, he was by them brought to trial, condemned heretic, and burnt at the stake.” ‘The principle of the Public School Society and their friends was, that the Catholics should pra theirschool taxes like others, (which they did, and then, after Las paid their taxes, send their children to the schools to have their minds imbued with sentiments like this, combining at once, pre- judice, uncharitableness and withal, blundering historical inacuracy. But | trust the experiments already made are sufficient to astablish my theory of the latent power of Truth over Falsshood—as being vastly more wonderful in its action on mind, than galvanism itself in itv application to inani- mate, but, articulated bodies, Crarren XXIII. The Bishop talks prettily about love, pours sweet things inte the soft Tabyrinth of old Mra. Stone's car—but he won't, no, he won't tell the name of the arvassin ‘There is one infallible teat proving that any religion so called, which inspires men with hatred, one towards another, even on account of religious difference, cannot, insomach, be of God ;- for God is love. True religion ingpires ns with sentiments of love towards God,-first, il; and next, love towards our neighbors as w, our Savior has taught us most beanti- ’ 2 example of the good Samaritan, that love for our neighbor means all mankind, You, yourself, sir, hi once illustrated (hie admirable and infallible text — #0 far ae sentiment and rabagin | are concerned: of true re- June J A new trialordered George A Paterma ada A Reynolds —Appeal on taxe ion of costs, Dismbsned without costa, but the fee of one vitnese to he deducted Mecd ve Wood. —Now trial granted, with costs to ablie. male modesty blushes and tren itself being made the object of h show aheslihy tone ‘of moral courage-—Ist those who bh) Babe mistake, take np his paper in the morning wash thei U. B cirenlt Court hands again, before going to brenkfast; let them eve Jows: 1. Peton & Steward ve, Curtis—In this case, re grow pale nt the idea of having incurred Bennett's enmity | worted in yesterday's Merald, Jury rendgred a vordiet and then, if you tel] me that “too contempt we phaistiies, eeticome cole te mateert notice,” | will admit you to and a believer « Adjourned over to 26th June. what you say. Butwntilthen, | cannot agree wi h you jeer AH and Tassert, whilst {do not fear him, that Bennett iv no Superior Court too contemptible to deserve notice. Will cit on Monday Let’ socte ark: H The Catholics, on the other hand, would not | by the, unsuspected, hidden, but almighty, power | jigion, And althongh my opinion, on such a topic, will Caarren XXX. ° ee} proceedings, by this new party. agree to have the feelings and understandings of | that is inherent in truth itsell, be received as little Aworth, will The Bishop slopes off shaking Ma fist at old Mrs, Stone; ena) Willsiton eA Distrie Cuarran XIV. their children misled by such sentiments, as the| Hear him again: prouder day tor the Protestant religion which you Mouing that he'l be the death of “Bennett yet~ but don't sa yileg eR it a ‘The bishop uncorks another bottle, and gives the natives a! benefit offered to them, in return for the taxes| ‘So iong as Bishop Hughes conducted the con- | #4 for your own fame, than that on which you rejected |g word about the arsassin. Hees Acquirten —We learn that R. W dose—Dut he won't give us, indeed he won't, the name of the | which the law required them to pay. ‘They peti- | troversy before the Common Council of the city— fecal y pad npg elon Mma elon hs ag d He may live near a mill on the top of a hit, eee eater Mar. May tn the tet at Wash ageassin. tioned, as good citizens ought to do, under the | 80 long as he sought in his own ephere, and by th | gihy hook recommended at averacious pry apportan “4 But [don't mean fo tell you his name, ngton, in which young Cochrane was k has been No, No, No, No; T don't mean (o tet! you his name. noney from a fellow lodger ot Barmy [have now submitted the entire case before that tribu: f quisted ~ Bell. Paty tied in Hartford County Court ona charge of stealing: ate weupons, reason and argument to con- "6 Hotel, tad aoe appro vince men of the accuracy of his views and the jus tice of his projects, he was not liable to censure, pressure of a grievance. hey discussed—they reasoned with their opponents. And this led to Teoults already referred to. Byt the ungenerous roduction. I will make bold to say that in sicknioss or in ealth, in life or at death, you cannot look back, exoe;t ‘with pleasurable emotions, to that proud dey on whiob, ‘ne following is a transcript of an article bg lished in the Freeman’s Journal, as fer back as February the 8d, of this year ;~