The New York Herald Newspaper, September 25, 1842, Page 1

SR ye THE NEW YORK HERALD. Vol, VALI =-No, 265 =~ Whole No, 3G NEW YORK, SUNDAY MORNING, SEPTEMBER 25, 1842.: MISCELLANEOUS _ he Anti-Angular System of Wri GREAT TY REDUCTION. th ( Loos ¥ pe lo MER, PRISTOW ot konton, 204 Brooklyn, that commenced for the cons ore nalk-—to Six Dolla y, weak Pann Po. taught ingwetve les d business-like style of ; exible steff, or cramped the may be, Sees isnens & » 235 Broadway. THE D » eat aud handsome, delicate and fashionable Ranuing Hand A neat aud hand iwanes Easy Luston Hi a, 1 writing lead ORS in New York can take 4 course in Three pert Wee Gets be seen from 8 to 1 Av Mor fom 4 10 f, ‘Evening Classes from 7 to 9 Boo: able aud single entry, ‘Taught on a superior me: fhiealty and practically. FIANAN FT 61 C—?I STENOGRAPHY. ystem of the Art of Wriuny Short-hand, for wlking domnLecipren Sermons, Trials at Law, ke. eewtangnepes sei feetly by Mr. Bristow in one course of Jessons | at 235 Broad way. ‘a specimen, the author is presented to every puyal for je. stlm® S_€FTY DESPATCH POST. PUST OFFICE, New York, 25th July, 1012, OURS of Detir each di Suudays excepted) at the Unperand Lower Post Ofliggs = Levers deposited batore Halfpmat & o'eock, AM PM| Will be sent out for de- livery at 9 A My and t aud ¢ o'clock, PM. before eck, A, M oe nee Letters tobe sent Fece, must have '*K them, otherwise three cents will be wham ths lettet is addieased. No money inust be enelosed in ietters unless revistered at tie principal offices, Lists of the tions (at all of whieh “free stamps’ tt purchased at 3 At atl the Station To u Staiap™ affixed to dof the pass w per 100, and every information, imay be obtained on ap- plication at th upperorlowertwst offices, Stamps, tssued by the late CityDespateh Post will be received. It is indispensable that the number of the residence ahould be stated in ail Leta rs seutt through this Post The Post Master so irregularities occur. cits the earliest information shontd any JOHN LORIMER ones J Post Mast THE TWO GREATEST INVENTIONS OF THE AGE. AAT ATE yal ENNEDY’S COMPOUND VEGETABLE PREPARATION. [FOR The treatment md presery infallible preservative against baldness, 11 the sealp sa sandra, all cutaneor fiections. Th re by the inventor itd re, Aci, in sively devoted to the perfection for the benefit of the growth the mean time, many hostmms tte rian cure ica potnica, Se his article 1s eauty of the led for the same ices in the full duly i is prized or its cleanliness and beauty admired. | Le: those who Mra ¢ these but givy At a single trial ond he has ho ars for the result,” It euly reaiires. to he known to be appre: iatod, and when s0 appreciat proprietor expects to obtain fis rewa from a discerning 1 ‘and asks it not before—he is not afraid of getting out of patience. y five hundred certiteates, te: intended te virtues, in from the most ited ven INVENTION NO. 2: ‘he invention of modern times, t hich we would rose alig call attention: is REN NEDYSS CELEBRATED PREMIUM CHEMICAL, HAIR DYE, the first ever in- i ‘This article, as can d y nd imported from any part of the raj superceding all other nostrums for changii olor of the hair and winakers to ab iful dark brown, oriet black, trom tlaxen, red grey, er ather objectionable color, ima ingle application, without alfeeting the skis. it was exhi Id at Niblo’s Garden of the Ameri- ived the first pre It may be ob- Ward & Co. Mav y owery, corner Walhe 330 Bowery corner Bond street, ‘Tiffany, Gourd & Ellis, 259 Broadway, and at the manufactory, No. 1 Pine street, New ol z aa GEORGE KENNEDY THE CRYSTAL, CORNER OF WALL §& BROAD STREET. Ye Conoiseurs and Epicures who throng the *! Money” strect, When you are dry, stop in and try, the “stock” that there you'll and re meet; We'll do our best, to stand the test, with any house in town, Aud while we do, we look (o you, tor some share of renown, HE; Proprietors of the above establishment w in redeeming the above pledge. and they will tele bat the very best toappear on the bar, caw also be found daily. Sat CHINA, GLASS, AND EARTHENWARE, 8 ASTOR. HOUSE. PVG Gannon edn Segoe te Mis French or English Porcelain Tea Sets, Di tes. French do" Granite io e2s2ses bieeoresediilt 40 Granite, blue or white, ite, or white, do ‘Ven Guys and Saucers, (21 pieces) Frouch Porcelain, i y lo. lo Fis dagen, font Cut Wines, per dozen, from Do Tumblers, do" do Lemouades, handled, Tanuy. Corueny. Of the finest descriptions, in sets or dozens, at the low OF$I2 the set. Just opened , 2 handsoine assortinent of ion N. B= mt for the sale of Simpson’s Lar Cornets, for rehictoi destoe wee eae so 83. sd in® re = y A NEW & IMPORTANT IN- 2A x wet 7 VENTION FOR THE LADIES. MES. LOVE, Corset Maker, No, 63 Tispenacd street, re- IML guectulty forms g w York and its vieini- ties, that she has mveuted a new article for the preservation of the health and strength pregnanev. This Abdominal Supporter is perfect in its application, acti as a support, and ing all strain upon the muscles, and the consequent (» Ligue and exhaustion of the whole system. It will preserve the its youthful symmetry Nothing that, has ever been rs so many advantages as does this Abdominal invigorating the system against every accident at- on. cured a patent. ‘She begs to refer to the follow lemen of. the, Medical Kgeule iment, De fonds 0 Fowl, B Bes MeDasald, Reatesny” Gillman. MD ¥ re » C. Castle, ) Dr Nelsou, Drv Wifraici, Mb, "SO. Foud, MD, 3.4W. Moor ~ Francis, TE stents mabiodem manhattan: its Ser r . elts, and braces, on advantagen: Imp PATENT PRESERVED PORTABLE MEATS ‘AND SOU. 2 po hrooms, "carts, turmine, pe ken, manufactured and sold whole: “WILLIAM MULLANE, te 224; Nasean’ st SPE ESALE, ‘Al PIENC SeGAR STORE, Baskaent ot Wintiam Stueer, Between Wall and.Pine Streets phish ____ NEW YORK E. W. HAND, EXCHANGE BROKEBR, saa. Jm*r_ No.2 CAMP STREET, NEW ORLEANS. DOCTOR BELL Coutinnes to be consulced daily, watil 10 2. Me CONFIDENTIALLY On all Aeticate dite at Itis private dffices: 4: CORTLANDT STREET. D Door from Broxdway, with the utmost confide all eas, delicate nature, requiring prompt ani sal ® Regular Pr tients may rel altention their cases'may desand, with asful issue, based upon the experidace of imany, years profexsioual duties. De Belt, does not advertise a Specific Drop or Pill for the c tees all that Anatomical, M sl im* 5 al, al Separate offie can gaggest in cach case. |. daily \ SOS AR ae Ree tr SUTTON & VANDERBILT i neripuionenitable for tie xtreme ly” reduced prices ring Establishment, 120 versally admitted to be far superior to any yet i liar preservative softening qualities to the forits exquisite brilliant jet black lustre, properties ixglled. Lem STEAM IMPROVED BLACKING in new wow ie "B.—For the genuine article apply to the ouly Warehouse, No. John at, comer of Broadway. WAS. LEE, slo im*r Lee & Thomson. + THE NEW YORK XYLOGRAPHIC PRESS, 46 MAIDEN LANE, UP STAIRS. E EXTENT of the varieties i Jepaet PSs. may safely challenge compe 2 establishment in the world, superintendence th ‘ seth, ing. and Plates of every descrip he reguisive jographie Ear eturers, Grocers or retail, and Deals Notes, Checks, Binh Stock, do De posi neath «Moat Ecasonalble term Bi) SUR tually attended to, and ar ss ered, rwanda to a partof the United States, oF einer 3 CHAS. SATELDS, Proprietor. Pensacola. (Correspondence of the Herald. j Navy Yano, Pensacola Sept. 15, 1842. The Yard—Com. Dallas—Exploring Expedition— Yard Improvenients—Steam Frigate Mississippi— Capt. McIntosh—The Boxer, §¢ Dear Si ¢ Appreciating your desire to inform the readers of the Herald of all that transpires throughout the leagth and breadth of our land, I will devote an hour to the narration of matters and things pertaining to this important naval station. The-Yard is now under the command of Capt. Lavallette, who bas reeently taken the place of Commodore Dallas. The latter has gone North un- der charges preferrgd against him by Lieut, R. Semmes, the nature of which will be developed when his case comes up before'the Court Martial, now in session on board the North Carolina. And here, I cannot withhold the expression of thanks due you for the ample and satisfactory reports you have’ fur- nished us of the trials which have hitherto occupied the Court, But for your enterprise, the public would have been in the dark respecting the affairs of the Exploring Expedition, and the multitudinous diffi- culties in which ifs commander and various officers have been engaged. . ; Our naval establishment at this place has been gra- duatly and extensively increased from its origin, A large sum of money has been expensed, part of it jue ge a and part of it most wastefully, Ten beautiful houses have been erected for the accom- modation ot officers, together with various out-build- ings, ata large cost. A high brick wall surrounds the yard, which is of doubttal utility, but required an immense stm to erect. Nearly a quarter of a 1 lion has been expended. in endéavoring to make a pier, or dock, which is now given up as a bad job, in consequence of certain faux pas being committed in its locations However, if Government has suf- fered-by these lavish expenditures, contractors, We. have been able to fill their pockets. most comforta- bly. ‘Two large and expensive octagonal buildings are now being finished for offices, an armory, cha- pel, &e. ‘They are badly located, and of an appear. ance not the imost tasteful... Many doubt whether they are called for by the present necessities of the service. OW the Yard, the stéam frigate Mississippi and sloop-of-war Ontario, are now anchored. The latter ha ployed as receiving vessel at New Or- whence. he returns when cold weather sets ~ Phe Mississippi is the present magnet of attrac- tion. Until within the last few days, she has been engaged in taking in coal, a large ‘supply of which was brought here in July from Boston. “Numerous citizens of Mobile and New Orleans come here ex- pressly to see this specimen of American skill. She has been highly admired, and has increased the cu- riosity before felt tosee her twin sister, the Missou- ri, which, having been “ turned off” at New York, is expected to equal, if not surpass the Philadelphia ship. The officers of the Mississippi appear to agree in the opinion that her spars are too large, and ren- der her very inefficient when opposed by a head wind. It is to be hoped this defect will be reme- died. The sloop of war Falmouth, Capt. McIntosh, with the brig Dolphin and schooner Boxer, are anchored off the town. Captain M’Intosh is among his old friends, having been upon the station for some time, a few years since. Your fellow-citizen, Lieutenant Comat. Ballus, who is in command of the Boxer, is rendering himself agreeable and popular by his ame- nity of manners and polite attention to all who visi his. snug litle craft. . She has bad an arduous cruise since leaving New York, having visited some of the most unhealthy parts during the most ansea- sonable part of the year, Happily she escaped every thing like disease. If time permitted, | would refer to the progress of our important fortifications, but this may anewer for a further occasion. I might make mention also of a colony founded on the river Perdido, a few miles froin this place, by various officers belonging to the station. ‘The lands being of fine quality, and to be had at government prices, the situation Yealthy, be- sides possessing other advantages, the enterprise will tend to cement anumber of officers to Florida, and render Pensacola among the most popular of our naval stations, It is supertlaous to say that your paper is univer sally read and admired. Indeed, it is almost the only one we can rely upon for correct information. Yours, truly, Live Oak. Cape Cod, [Correspondence of the Herald.) Care Cop, Sept. 9, 1842. Description of the Cape—Fish—Whalers—Te Girls —Politics—Light Houses. Dear Bennert:— You have correspondents all over the world, who enrich yourvaluable paper with the sayings and do, ingsin their respective localities. But little, I fancy- did you expect to receive a letter from the: famous Cape Cod: and as little did your correspondent ex- peet to scribble onthe sand banks of that noted 'pen- insular. But accidently finding myself inthe town of Truro, | imagined that a brief description of the things there, would interest you. The entire Cape is one sand bank, totally arid and unproductive ; scarcely bearing soil enough for the support of a few potatoesand alittle corm, The peo- ple, of course, are amphibious, living altogether by fisheries. Many fish are caught immediately upon the coast, which derives its name from one variety ; while the major part of the men are engaged in for- eign fisheries. “On the banks of Newfoundland, in the Whalers, in the Arctie and Antaretic seas, in pur- suit of seals; and in fact, wherever fish and enter- prise are to be discovered, there you find the legiti- mate Cape Codman:’ Till lately this people have been held in. horror by all mariners, from their supposed wrecking predilection, and one saying among sailors is “ that a distressed seaman is met by the Cape Ged girls with stockings and mittens in-one hand, and a brick bat in the other.” This I hold, however, to be a vile calumny. Ihave spent nearly a tort- night here, and a more hospitable people have never seen. |The girls, bless, their simple sonis, are by far too pretty for Amazons, and all that I have seen, give distressed’ mariners’ more cordial welcomes than brickbats. ‘ In politics the Cape people, aswell as others, are turning about ; they are heartily sick of the petty manouvering and personal spite displayed by the two old corrupt parties, that have so ong cursed and agi- tated the country. They are equally disgusted with the impudent charlatanism of the whig peeude finan- ciers, and the latituainarian doctrines of the ultra locofocos. Their eyes naturally turn upon John Ty- ler and the independent spirits, that. are railyin about him to put down corruption, to rab.out cn] scores, and begin anew with principles that have stood the seorching ordeal of the last half century, unincumbered with the clogs and corruptions aceu- mulated by fourteen years mal-administration, There are cight light houses on the Cape, which I visited, of course, among the other curiosities of the place. ‘There isa marked difference between the one at Truro and the other seven. The last was built under the old exploded system, and when con. trasted with the first, marks strongly the advance of useful science inthe last few years. ‘The light at ‘Truro was erected or Mr. Lewis, as | learn from the iption on one of the hoops, as follows :-—*'This rn, apparatus aud fixtures, was designed and ex- ted by J. W. P. Lewis, being the first of the kind erected in the United States;” and really it isa very @plendid reular, each side is formed enti f plate glass of magni- ficent dimensi: ich two tiers of lamps, laced in 25 inch reflectors, blaze with almost solar light. ‘The interior of the tower is fitted witha light and elegant cast iron spiral staircase, executed alter an original plan of Mr. Lewis, and not only reflects much credit on his skill as an engineer, but also upon his taste as an architect. Here, however, as else- where, we see an excellently developed plait, parti- ally marred by the miserable economy of those who controlled its management. Mr. Lewis was com- pelled to fit his beautiful, apparatus upon an old tow- er, totally fnfit'to bear it; as far as he was permit- ted, he has given even to this old affair of bricks and sand a more tasteful finish and finer outline. The Truro light has been erected alittle more than wo years. I understand, by-the-bye, that Mz. Lewis is the same gentleman lately appointed by President Tyler, to examine, and report upon the condition of the lights in the United § és, and judging by the evidence of ability before me, a happier selection could mot be made: Veritas. Want or Conrroenck.—An. editor in the West insists upon it that confidence is not restored. | His tailor, who ased to trust him for a suit of clothes, now refuses fo trust him even for a pair of pants, * Tne Sunseam or THe Heart.—It was once said of w beautiful woman, that from her childhood she had ever spoken smilingly ; as if the heart poured joy from the lips, and they turned it into beauty, "” General Sessions, TRIAL OF THE REVEREND MR. VERREN. Before Recoriler Tallmadge and Judge Lynch. The trial of the Rev. Antoine Verren, Rector of Du Saint Fsprit—-(French Protestant Church) of this city, charged with commit perjury in ing an affidavit on June 19Uk, 1940, at the conclusion of the trial when Bartelemy and De Bullion, his present accusers, were convicted with Colon, and sent to Blackwell’s Island for libel and attempting te extort money, was commenced in theCourt of General Sessions on Thursday last. Our origi- nal intention was not to have published the evidence until the trial had finally closed, but it occupying more time than was anticipated at its commencement, we now pre- sent a full and accurate report. ‘ The defendant, Mr, Verren, appeared in court accompa- nied by his eminent counsel Ogden Hoffman and Hugh Maxwell, Esqs. The prosecution was represented by Attorney General Barker and Henry M. Western, Esq., who is the counsel ot Barielomy. An attempt having been made by these same complainants to implicate Mr. Distriet Attorney Whiting on the same offence, and indict him for suborna- tion of perjury before the Grand Jury that found the pre- sent bill, he very properly declined to act as public prose- cutor in the cause. The Crier was requested to call the Jury, when Bensamuy P. Beach, answered, and on being questioned by Attorney General Barker, as to his previous knowledge of the cause about to be brought on for trial, and whether he had formed an opinion, replied that he had not heard of the case before that morning, To the last part of the ques- tion he replied in the negative. He wastherefore request- edto take his seat as foreman of the jury. Charles H. Booth, George Brush, Enoch Metler, Charles F. Blake, Frederick Diamond, Robert S. Place, John Wi- ley, Aaron B. Heath and Henry Schenk, were next called insuccession and answering the questions put to them in nearly a similar style, were also accepted. Axdixw Warttoex was called and declined serving, Stating that he had pre;judged the case, “He was therefore set aside, Connei J. Carownir was next called, and stating that ke had formed no opinion, was accepted, thus making up the full numbe ‘The court at this time was well filled with spectators at- tracted by the peculiarity ofthe trial and the known abili- ty of the distinguished coftnacl who were to conduct Among the members of the bar and bench who attended during the trial, we noticed Judge Edwards, District-At- torney Whiting, Gulian C. Verplanck and others. ‘The Jurors having been sworn and order restored, Attorney General Bankxr rose to open the cause for the prosecution. He is an elegant specimen of man, in stature and form, and his mind appears to have been peculiarly prepared and cultivated for the distinguished profession in which he has obtained such eminence, He is ready, tenacious, persevering, compre most eloquently eloquent, but mest sarcasti Sally tic when engaged in the intricacies of a eross-examination. He stated the particulars of the complaint in a few words, and th introduced the name of De Bullion as the priacipal evidence to sustain the prosecution, whose “statements he said would be corrobboratad by the evidence of other witnesses. He then cantioned the jury to abstain from prejudices and propos: sessions, und rely golely upon. the evidence aspresented to them, for an acquittal or conviction, He alluded tothe sacred character of defendant, but placed him before the jury in the same position that any other man would be, about to be tried for the same offence. He contended that certain peculiat expressions and words contained in the letters in the handwriting of defendant, which ho (defend- any) alleges he is not the author of, would go far to prove the reverse of his statement, and thus tend to sustain the charge alleged against him. But thejury must rely upon the evidence alone, as all presumptions were to be con- strued in favor ot defendant. He concluded most elo- quently, by stating that he had undertaken this cause in obedience to the call of the public prosecutor of this coun- ty, who from certain circumstances, had declined to con- duct it. That he stood there merely as his representative, having no feelings to,gratify nor no ambition to obtain; but as God was his judge,’ who knew his heart, no man would be more gratified of the acquittal of defendant, if it was obtained throngh the law of the land, on a just ver- dict of his country ‘The first witness called was Hexny M. Vaxpenvoonr, clerk of the court of Sessions, who was sworn, and deposed as follows :—I am clerk of this court. There is a judgment recorded in it of the People vs. Peter Bertelemy, Louis de Boullion, and John Colos the court record was made up 15th April, 1S4l. TI {rial took place in the term of the court in'June, 1840, commencing 16th of that month, and lasted two’ days. —There are also two affidavits on record which were mede at the conclusion of that trial,one by De Bullion, and another by Mr. Verren. ‘The hand-writing of the affidavit of Verren is in the hand-writing of Mr. Whiting. Tdo not know that in which De Bullion’s is written. hese affidavits were presented to the court on the con- clusion of the trial, when Bartelemy and De Bullien were convicted, and after the evidence had keen closed. Mr. Westetx then rose and read the fellowing, which was admitted at the time to be received as evidence, by Distriet Attorney Whiting :— “General Sessions of the Peaco—Louis De Bullion im- ploaded with others and the people. “New York. as. Louis Be Builion, tho defendant, being sworn, saith that the testimony of John Granger given in this cause, is untrue, and was therefore a surprise on this defendant. That since the adjournment of the court yesterday, he has made enquiry into the general character of said witness, and has discovered, and verily believes the same is bad, ponent further saith, that he is advised by his counsel, and verily believes, that it is necessary to his defence to impeach sid witness, and that this morning is the earliest opportunity he has had of do- ing the same. .. “LOUIS. DE BULLION. © Sworn in open Court, * June 19, 1840. ‘And then the following wh nd then the following which was prepared ino) courtby District attorney Whiting at the time of the of, fering of the above and also acceptdas evidence. “General Sessions of the Peace—Louis De Boullion, im, pleaded with others ad. the People. “New York ss. Antonie Venuen, the complainant’ i the above cause, being duly sworn, says that he isnot the author of the letters produced belore the Court on the trial of the cause by the defendant, and'marked A, B, C, }) j Mat De Bullion showed tepouent the originals of the letters, and requested deponent to correct the language,and without hearing or reading them, they wers left on depo- nent’s tablein bis study ; that about this, period several anonymous letters, written to injure deponent, came to his knowledge, the authorof which letters deponent was ignorant of. ‘That when deponent .read them, ho: dixco- vered the style to be very like those he had seen and heard of. That at the pressing solicitation of his wife, he con- sented to make copies of thesaid letters so left with him by said De Bullion, for the purpose of discovering the au- thor of the other letters so written anonymously as afore- said. ‘That after they were so copied, deponent left them on his table, from whence they, were taken and carried away, together with the originals thereof, in the hand- writing of De Bullion. That deponent now Verily lieves the same were taken by said De Bullion, or by some other persons from whom either he or Barttelemy must have received them.” That the pretence that the author of, or had any lot or part in. their productioi utterly false and untrue in every particular. *SWorn in open Court, 19th June, 1540. ‘ A. VERREN, “HL Musas, Clerk,” This isthe affidavit on which the charge of perjury is brought. Atexaxpen J. CoTHrat, called and sworn—I reside in Chambers street ; have known Mr. Verren’ some eight or ten years; T'was'a vestryman of his church; am acquaint- ed with his hand writing. Witness was hefe handed tiie foie letters which were written in French on one sheet of paper in the band-wri- ting of Mr. Verren, and which forms the main point of manuscript evidence to systain the prosecution. tress continuéd.—The hand writing in this paper is Mr. Verren’s. Mr. Maxweut. said that they admitted that fact as ox- plained in the affidavit ; but aéked witness particularly as to the erasures and interlineations. Wirxess continued.—The inteflineations in letter D. appear to be inthe hand-writing of Mr. Verren; | have sven him write often; the last time was at the vestry meeting previous tothe last trial about two years ago. Here the letters in question were given to witness to compare with the translation in the pamphlet, and he stated that so far as he could ascertaim, it appeared to be a fair translation. Mr. eaten here read extracts from the pamphlet containing the translation of the four letters on the sh of paper, which were marked in thé order they we written—A. B.C. D. Letter A. was supposed to have been addressed to Mr. De Behr, editor of French paper, B. to Mri De Lai Forest, the French Consul ;C, to. Madame Brunel, anil D. to Mr. Canda. ‘The extracts read by Mr. Western, contained obsceneand indecent expressions. ‘The reading of extracts was here closed, and the Atto - ney General directed the crier to call Louis de Bullion. Considerable amazement was here presented on th part of these spectators of the court, whogwere aware that this man was still on Blackwell’s Island serving out the fence of the law for a libel and an attempt to extort money from Mr. Verren, whom he was now called to im- plicate on the crime of perjury. Anofficer was despatched into the city prison, where De Bullion was confined during his stay as a witness on this trial, and he soon appeared and téok the stand nd was sworn. Mr. Maxwet, one of the counsel for acetsed, objected to the admission of his testimony on the ground that he had been convicted of an infamous crime and thereforo should not be allowed to testify in acase wheren question of veracity alone was the subject of controversy. Attorney General Baaxen denied that he came within the statute depriving him of his civil and legal rights,and remarked thet if a man bad been sent. to the Penitentiary throngh perjury it would be hard indeed, if when his time expired he conld not seek redress through the law. ‘The Court decided that his case did not come within the statute, ashe hat not committed a crime of magnitude suiticient to. send him to the State prison. Me was there- fore admitted to he heard. Lovis pe BuLiton,—Witness stated that He conld not speak nor Wwiders English well arid therefore desired rpreter. “He was then. asked when he came 'to thif country und where he came from. Answer—I came in 1883 and from Burgundy: Itwasthen concluded that he ¢ould proceed’ without an interpreter. Wrrness continued—I have been a teacher ofthe French in this country ; | know the Rev. Mr. Verren ; L became ‘acquainted with him in 1935 fn the stimmer time ; I was introduced to him by two of his Counttymen, and for the purpose of receiving his patronige, he being a clergyman Tahaving influence ; in 1836 | was intims ly acquaimted with him ; 1 was taken sick in September 1896, and he-used to visit me daily ; { Wasa married man at that tite Thad hired aroom at that time for my wife and myselt iy Greenwich street ; | was sick two months ; he was kind to me and gus jab the so- licitation of Mr. Verren Thi street for the ry of keeping rders; he was my security for the rent of the house ; | lived there one year ; at this time I used to see him every evening ; 1 then at. tended his church ; after [ had hired the house in 1837, he made me a vestryman and the secretary of the vestry. The Arrouwey Gentnat asked if the office was elective by the members ofthe church. Oeven Horrman replied in the affirmative. Wires, continue: 1839 I was elected—I was re- elected three times—I then lett for two reasons. ‘A paper was here shown witness, being a letter from Mr. Verren, inviting witness to attend a meeting of the Vestry of the church, which he said he had received. The four letters which were copied by Mr. Verren, ‘were also handed witness, who state that he first saw the copy in 1833, at Mr. Verren’s house, in the evening, in summer time; Mr. Verren took ‘it from dying’ table, and came to me and said :—" There is what } have done or mate.” He then read this paper to, me, and asked ‘mo to take it away ated make ir copies of it, and send them to such directions as he would giveme. TI sent letter Ato Mr. De Behr, B to Mr. De Laforest, the French Consul, © to Madame Brunel, D to Mr. Canda; after this paper was read over and giv me,’ Mr. Verren made use of very injurious expre Hay. Twas not his private secre tary. Leopied the letters in Frenth, I sent these copies, from day today, and sent them at intervals. They wore sent through t t office. T donot think they were all sent off within the same week. ‘They we as I had oceasion to go to the Post office, Mr. Verren askod me several times iff had sent them to the Post office, 1 think this was in the month of July or June, as it was very warm, i told him that I had destroyed this paper 4s he had previously desired me to do. ‘hen he gave me this original tovopy, he told me to destroy it, and | told him 1 had. 1 used this paper to make the copies about a week Arrorney Gexenac.—Did Mr. Verren ever speak to you about destroying that paper after the night fe gave itto you? Wiryvss,—He did ; and as he had read them to me very fast at the time, I promised to make copies, upon consi- devation | thought that if f copied such letters [had better keep the original, as I did not understand the horror at first. I was afraid, and for fear that | should be exposed, I kept it. T never saw this paper until it was presented to me by Verren. I had pothing to rely upon for a living except my French lessons. My office as Clerk of the Ves- , Was it mere honorary one, without salary. My kind relations existed with Mr. Verren until 1839 Arronsey Gexrnat—s sent, what werethe feelings French Consul Mr. De La For Answer—When the Prince de Joinville came here a dinner was given him, and Mr. De La Forest, the French Consul, was President ; many persons attended ; Mr. Ver- ren subscribed ; some days afterwards he ascert: that he was located at the table lower than the Prince ; he was very any with Mr. La Forest because he was not placed alongside or opposite the ce; he said he thought thnt Mr. La Forest lal not place him ina position agreeable to his standing ; he broke out in very strong and bloody in- vectives against Mr. De La Forest and the persons who had charge of thedinner ; he waseo angry that be sakl he would not goto the dinner ; I don’t know how long this was before this paper was handed to me tocopy ;_ while Miss De La Hay wasa resident of my house Rie: Verren used to speak illof her, but the reason Ido not know ; she came to my house in May, 1837, and remained all the year; I know nothing more about this paper. Arrouney GencnaL—Why was Mr. Verren hostile to Mr. De Behr, the editor of thie French paper? Wirsxss—Mr. De Behr had inserted an article com- imenting Mr. Hautrieve, the son in-law of Mr..De La ‘orest ; I know no other cause. Qoxertox wy Sunon—Did Mr. Verren go to that dinner? Wrvxres—I do not know. ‘The direct examination by prosecution here closed, and Mr. Maxwell commenced the Cross-examination—I became acquainted with Bertel- emy and Colon in 1889—I never intended to publish any book against Mr. Verrén—I never published it—the ano- nymous letters were sent by me in 1833, and Mr. Bertel- emy began to publish his book about a yea afterwards— I gave these letters to Mr. Bertelemy on the eve of the publication of the book—no body else had the letters ex- cept Mr. Bertelemy—I kept them secret—I copied and sent these anonymous letters against my own wishes—I do not recollect the name of many of the members oftlae vest- ry except Mr. Gareshe, and one or two others. Ma. Maxwetr—Did is make an application to Mr. Ver- ven not to publish the book in which these letters were in- serted ? Witxgee--No—he made me an offer not to publish them —in June, 1839, this application was made to me, some one ortwo weeks after gp bearres y had cei with him had ceased—when I left him in 1839, it was for two motives which {will explain— Mr. Maxweit—How do you explain why you say that Mr. Verren offered to give you money to suppress these letters, when you had told him a year before that you had destroyed them * Wrrness, here attempted to explain, but could not. Maxweit—Mr. Interpreter, put the question agam to witness, relative to the offer made by Verren to give him money. ‘Witness finally believed Mr.Verren offered him money to purchase his friendship ; 1 was educated a Catholic riest ; I never turned Protestant ; Talways kept my faith; merely took the situation of Secretary of the Vestry o} the Protestant church at Mr. Verren’s request ; I read the prayers and booksef the church while in attendance at the service. Arronxey Gexenit objected to the enquiry as to the Teligious faith of witness, when Mr. Maxwet replied that he had every respect for the Catholic church and for all good Catholics, but he could hardly conceive a more anormous admission made by a witness than the one just presented to the court and jury ; he had confessed that he had acted as a hypocrite and worse than any apastate in thus accepting office under a Protestant church while believing in all the tenets of the Catholic faith, and couli it be said by the prosecution that such evidence should not be admitted ; evidence that was calculated to detract from his credibility, of so mach im- portance, should be drawn out at once and presented to court and j He did not wish to be uncharitable to- wards the witness, but be thought that any man who could have the audacity, the impudence, the hypocrisy to attach himself to achurch, in the faith of which he did not believe, for mere purposes of gain or interest, could not do any thing much more base or more wicked. Reconver—If the question is asked forthe: pu impeaching the character of witness it is admis Ocben Horrman said the question was not asked to as- certain the religious faith of witness whether he was a Catholic or a Protestant, bnt he had here confessed that he had been educated a Catholic Priest, not aflayaman; and that he had joined « church of different faith, an worshipped in such faith. Such evidence, and all apper tuining to such 'apoint should certainty be drawn forth for the knowledge ofthejury. We here show a man who willeven sacrifice his religious faith to advance his own interests, and will it he said that we cannot show by this very witness whether what he here utters is drawn from @ pure fountain or from 8 polluted source, en from the lips of a hypocrite who has trampled under his feet the faith ofhis fathors. The Arvonxey Gexenat said that be could not at- tribute any other than a proper motive to opposing coun- in asking these questions, ‘but his view ofthe te timony to be elicited wax that no question should be asked that was not in some way pertinent to the issue of the trial. He said that in this country we were accustomed to bow with respect to the religion of others, and therefore how does this court know what cauise or what motive had in- duced this witness to Worship af he, had? He was alone resporisible to his God for such an ‘act, whose power Was ubove this court. “He regretted th it counsel should resort to such a sotirce to excite pri es In the minds of the jury, but he could not believe that euch testimony was of acharacter to be brought into the canse,as the faithof a witness and his peculiar manner of worship were pot in- compatible, ahd could not be tried here. The Count decided that the inquiry was admissible, and Mr. Maxwell then continued, when witness answered that he was a Catholic by conviction, Maxwatt—Do.you believe that an oath on. a protestant bible'is binding Witenes —Y think so, if it has not been altered ; if do not believe it is binding, copled,and sent rs W r. Verren towards the ? e of it has been attered 1 Maxw#it—Do you believe that the oath you have taken on thet bible before you has a binding force ? Wirnviks—I can't say. Maxwett—Have you ever told any body thatthe oath taken in our courts on a Protestant bible was not binding oo you? rewmsg—T Maxwets—P De Bullion ? Wirrnss—Yes, I have. The court here took a recess of one hour, until half past 4 o'clock. Wy, ave taid 20. ve you ever gone by another name than TRIAL REeUMED, Croseexamination of De Burrtox by prosecution, con- tinwed—When I was sick, Mr. Verren supplied me with food, clothing and medicine: be also lent me $100 to pay my first quarter's rent; | know of no other cause for Mr. Vorren’s hostility to Mr. De LaForest, except. that pre- viously stited ; I was in the empioy!of Mr. De La Forest of 34 gl was discharged from his employ ; that Mr. De La Forest owed me $600 or Ir. Verren became my security for rent; $440 of my money, that 1 had lent him; 1 never’had any feat th Miss De le Haye neither after or before the lettiirs were sent ; I boasted to Mr. Jers that I'threw a pitcher at her head, but T did not; she le! house in May, 1888; my wife and her quarrelled, but 1 id not know the cause ; 1 know a Mr. Berte; he isa able man. ne WHE aih'e Lat yh vee beh De Li e was nnold hag Jand g' , that she had ma your acholae, and you were peel ed to ruin her gha- raet Wrrxess—Yes, I did say so,because Mr. Verren tol me to abnse het ; he also told mé to call her i Ginsey 1 be lieved it because Mr. Verreni told me and Tknew he knew her; when T was dismissed, Mr. Corrie was put in my Inet; 1 was told hy Mr. Colon that if I would give ¥.Burtelemty the papers that nit Folutivéto Mr. Vor. ren, hé wou! me $500 ; the proposition having twice bis 4 itsarprised me very money before 5 mitch; Mr. Colon said that Tcould get $1000 from Mr. Verten by threatening to expose him; Mr. Bartelemy was there and said that man must be exposed.” tised 48 go every day to Chdubert’s; Haught school there ; Chaubert w qsexamined ag a witness.at my trial in my favor. ” Mew Hite you ever applied to any friend of Mr. Verren to give you $1000 to suppress these letters 7 Wirxess—-No ; Dr. Formel told me that ax Mr. Verren had seduced my wife, I had a perfect right to dp or say . ¢ anything against him; he told me that if he had $1000 hi would take me to his house and give it to me to take ie out of this Re: Maxwrit—Did you ever explain how you got these letters ? Witness—I got them from the hand of Mr. Verren Maswrci—Do you believe or have you r waid that ‘ou belioved that it was right to swear false aguiust a Pro- tant if necessary for your own interest. Wirsess—Mr. Verren told-me to set my house on fire and when I said it was against my conscivace, he said you need not fear the Bible. Maxweit—Did you ever wear tho casseck or any mi nor order of the Catholic priesthood ? Mr. Bowayee was heré called as interpreter. Wrexess—Yes, | held the office of sub-deacon which any secular man might alyo haye held. Maxwere.—Did you ever say to any person that you would ruin Miss De‘La Hay ? Wityess.—That is quite new to my ear; 1 never said 80 ; Iwas offered a $1000, if I would stop the publication of iny manuscript and go to France. Direct examination resumed by Arrornny Genknat.— ‘Do you regard the obligation taken by you to-day as bin¢ ing upon you, morally und religiously ? Yes, I think } do. .—Whiat was it that Verren offered you a $1,000 ‘to settle? Witxnss.—'he reason was that Mr. Verren wanted to Set meout of the way to suppress the letters, Banken.—When did Mr. ¥ ‘erren first learn that the Tet- tors he had given you to copy, ‘wore not destroyed ? Wirxxss.-lt was after | had read the manuseript to several persons, that ! supposed Mr. Verrem suspe el that it wey not destroyed ; | read the manuscript to Mr. Colon, Mr. Sauer, and Mr, Chaubert. Bauxen.—When and where was it that these letters were given up to Barthelemy tor publication | ithina week afer ‘my acqual: tance with art] ¥, gave him copies of the letters original myself—this was in December, 1839. Banxen.—Haw long was it befure the offer of the $1000 Verren, was it that you suspected that something was in your domesti¢ affairs, in which your wile and ‘erren were concerned t Wrrness.-cit was about 10 days. Batkyn.—Why did ron tell Mr. Verren that you threw a piteber of water at Miss dé Ja Hay? Witwess.—b knew that Mr. Verren was apposed to her, and T merely told him the lie to pleas» him; Ido not know where my! wite is ; m the last week of May, 1839, I Was told that Mr. Verren hail seduced my wile. Mx. Sguastian Heatin, called and swora.—1 was, born n France. and have been here 16 years. — [came from Grenoble. I reside at 400 diway, and have no bu- siness ; L have known Mr. Ve 883 ; his brother was apartnerof mine: my acquaintance was yery in- timate With Mr. Verren in 18% What did Mr. Verren tell you were his or pons of warfare that he used against those with whom he was displeased t ‘This question was objected to by counsel for defence, and the Attorney Gen stated that his object in making”| the inquiry wai to corroborate the testimony of the wit. ness who had just lett the stand ; he sid they intended to prove i? witness that the course pursued by, Verren, as acknowledged to this witness, was to write anonymous letters, and that he had proposed to this very witness to act.as his amanuensis for that purpose. Oavex Horrman replied by saying that he objected most decidedly to the course of the Attorney General, in thas stating all the main points of evidence he intended to prove while addressing the Court, as to its admissibility. Mr. Banxxe said he had no such motive—his onject was merely to present the matter as it came to his own mind, and the weight of his judgment was still in favor of the ad- missibility of the testimony. M jaxweLw said that the evidence in his opinion was missible, anu even it were, it would have but little ght with the jury, as the witness had hod a quarrel with Mr. Verren, who had objected to his brother acti: ie as apartner, with him, because, certain counterfeit monwy had been sent out of the country to defraud thoseon whom is intended to be passed. he Reconver—H the object is to show the sctenter or it related | between the prosecution,and the counsel of nt—such as evidence of a man’s passing a counterfeit uote previous to the one for which he was about to be ti- ed, it would be all well enough, but he was not awarethat mere declarations should be taken as evidence, as it would be opening a wide dodrin'such a cause, and bea dangerous admission of testimony. It wastherefore overruled. Banxen -Do you know the feeling of Mr.Verren to wards the French consul ? Wrtnvss—No 8 Bansxn—Plepse take these letters (handing him the four on one sheet, in the hand-writing of Mr, Verren) and point out, if youcan, any certain or peculiar expressions, Counsel for defence objected, but the Court decided that the testimony was admissible. Witness continued—The words “ assinine ass,” in these letters, Mr. Verren has often used, and he hastold me that he had manufastured them himself; he has used this word & million of times, T think, in my presence—perhaps not more than-$00,000 times. AvexannenConne called and sworn] know the French consul; he ay L-a F-o-r-est. Lknow Mr. De ‘La Huutrive, the father in-law of thé French con- sul; be spells his name De La H-a-u-t-riv-o ; Lknew De Bullion when he was with the French consul, and when he was there, Hautrive was vice consul. ‘De Bullion had an opportunity to see the manner in which hisname was spelled every lay while there. Cross-exainined by defence—I think De Bullion left the French eonsul in 1884-07 1835; he left bectuse De Hau. trive was to perform his dyties, as well as.hisawn. ’ Dr. J.C. Hocens called Madame De La Haye was a family in’ 1896 and 1887 ; Mr. Verren de- i ersation that took between Mre De Bullion and Miss De La Haye, in which Miss De La Haye made uve of libidinous expressions, and he then in- forined me that Mra. De Bullion-was_a woman of veroci- ty ; [think this was in 1638 or 1839; I do not recollect any particular expressions he made use of; he reflected on her chastity. Pepserenemninsd— lee, eps 0h se family at this time; Thad understood some eighteen months after she had been in my family that she had entertained unfriendly feelings towards my family, and it was for this reason that J. went to see Dr. Verren ; I do not recollect the conversation I had with him ; Mr. Bartelemy also cameto me and said that Mrs. De Bullion. bad sald that Miss De La Haye had made use of injurious expressions about By family. ‘The’ Court at ¥o’cleck P. M. adjourned to Friday morn- ing:at 11 o’oloek. Fuipay Moning, Manamé De Lr Have called and sworn for prosecution, and answered throngh interpreter. Q.—Where do you reside ? A— At Amboy. Q.—How long have you been in this country, and from what country are you? A.—I have been here eight years; before | was in Lor- raine part; and in Paris part. @—Where did you come when you came ‘to this country? ‘Aho Now York: Qi—Where did you go when you atrived here ? Lame out as the governess of Miss Livingston, When did you become acquainted with Mr, Ver About six yearasinee. I wasintroduead to him by 1 and my object was to obtain his assis- tance in my Dusiness. Q~-How.intimate were you with Mr. Verren,and how Jong did you continue so? vines os A About a year afer my aéquainldnce with Mr. Ver- ren S.went to Jersey to instruct wyoung Creole lady, und after returning, J met Mr. Verren in the street, who ro- cognised me. At that time | was living with Dr. Rogers, as a friend, and instrue!od his daughters. At thts time Mr. Verren showed me a great deal of interest. Mr. Verren counselled me to go into the house of ‘Mr. De Bullion I did not thin know De Bultion. “Ttold him that [aid not like to go,alone into a house where | was not-ac- quainted, as 1 might find myself in had company, but he tolt'mé (iat ‘every thing was tight. Mr. Verrén then made.@ statement to me relative to the character of Mrs. Rogers, which was quite infamous, and which I have not repeated to any one. Mr. Horrman objeeted to such evidence. Q.—About what time did you go into De Bnilion’s fa mily? ‘2—In the month of May, 1837, Q.—How long did you continue in De Bullion’s family? A.--One year. : Q.—Did Mr. Verren, in inducing you to go to De Bul- lion’s house, state that it was to beofany. interest to him 7 A.—No, he did not Q.—Did he tell y: on (going there, jthat he was se- curity for De Bullion’s rent. A.—Yes. : Q.—Did he offer that a# an inducement jfor you to go there? A.—He engaged me to go there as a mutual interest to both De Bullfon ant me, bu Ly Q.—How intimate was Verren in the family of De Bul- lion, at this time t . I was absent several hours each day, and once Lin vited him and Dé Butlion fo take supper with me. Q.—How often was he there ? know that I was away from the house a great deal. Mow frequently was Mr. Verren at the heuse of De Bullion while you were there ? vigeyrtee A.--I recollect of three or four ostensible visits during the middle offthe day, while I wasthere ; he alto came to see me at the same time. of .-—What was the relation between Madame /de Bullion A.—-Madame de Buillon and Mr. Verren were tacitly hostile. Buillon did you observe this tacit hostility ? —About three months ; and [ believe that Mr. Verren of the wite of de Boullion. &—Do you mean the cause of a chunge of feeling to- A.-It was about three months after [went there did not suit me to sit next Madame de Boullion in Q—What feeling did Mr. Verren exhibit on the sub- ject, and how did he express it? Q.—How long did this feeling exist, and did itincrense? A.—He went there laboring under fear, believing that Q—After the supper there, was the conduct of ‘M: Verren friendly os ctherwise! 7 ; tthe supper, Q—Were there st ‘ fadame Bullion and witness; Mr. Verren' was very polite to witness. then about other families, should be repeated ; Mr, Attorney. General coincided, and told the witnasserfo and Verren, so far as bl saw while there 7 Q.—How long after you became a resident of the family her deceived me or was deceived himself in the conduct wards Madame de Buill it Mr Verren’s church, and I told him so. A.—He gave me no answer. they wished him to speak on family affai A.—Cannot say, unless I can tell what took pl ers 7 A-—No one but 4 Here Mr. Maxwens ested whether the scandal state nothing about what took place at the supper unlpss Price Two Cents , the, betwoen witness and “Mr hat transpired relative to the ill feeling between nd yourself? Verre Verren A.-Cannot say, unless I speak of others. Was there any thing that occured that evening, ba caused any ill feeling between them and yourself t A. Yes Here fifteen minutes were occupied in @ consultation ce, the Jury retired, and the reporter's had a general conversa- tion. . &--How hostile, and to, what extemt did Mr. Verren become hostile towards you, for any thing that occurred at that supper ? A-—Itwas only a tacit coolness ; at that su] Mr. Verren proposed to pay the ot a person whe occu- pied rooms in the same houso with me, To whatestentdid Mr. Verren exhibit enmity for what occured that day. cannot ithout giving it in my way. ~Did Mr. Verren’s feelings seem much or little alie A Q A.—Cannot say how far ; told Mr. Verren: she wanted all her mouey as she wanted to take ahousein May. When did this ill feeling appear ? A.—When the witness established & school under tho patzonees of Madame Chegarie and did not refer to Mr. erren. * Q.—How long before the anonymous letters 7 A.—Did dot sce them till after she saw them in court, at the furmertrial. Q.—How long before you heard of letters prejudicial to your character ! A.—in the month of July, more than six months after. ward i a did you firet see any letters of that charac ter A.—Saw but one and Mrs. Brom mous letter, in which she said sh of Mr. De Bullion, showed? me an anony wthe hand writing A.—-T objected.to read the letter ; the first line in this copy'is the same. Q:—Atter you saw that letter when did you ‘call’ upon Mr. Verren? A.--I did not call upon him ; I met him in Broadway ; 1 told him some time atterwards that the family of Mr. De Bullion was giving me a great deal of trouble, but did not speak of the anonymous letter. ne What did Mr. Verren say to the general com- plaint ? A.—He said I know you have an unfavorable opinion of mo-1 said that Lhad every respect for his ecclesiastical Swe. but thought nothing of him that I could not frank y avow. Q —Where did you next see him + A.—I wrote him a note and requested him to call on -Did he come? he came I told him that [had sent jor him as a protector for myself; that the intimate ac: aintanee between Madame De Bullion and himself might have prevented the anonymous letters ; he said he did not know anything about them ; and that De Bullion would not have dared to ever trust him (Mr. Verren) with the knowledge of such letters; L observed that not mueh talent was necessary to wr uch vulgar letters, such as Lunderstood they Were ; he then said O, no, they were not written by a coarse man, as he had ‘seen one of tI bao ; he concluded by saying that he would do nothing about ead What kinid of@ man did he say had written these jetters 7 A.—He appeared astonished to think that I believed that a vulgar man wrote those letters; | think this was in August, four years ago ; and in speaking of the French Consul he made use of the same language that was in the letter sent to the Fr Consul. ; Q.—Was this the last conversation that you hed with him ? Q—FYes, Q.—What else did he say of the French Consul ? A.—He spoke of his intemperance, and used other lan guage that is in the letter. Q.—Had you an interview with Mr. Verren two months before the trial for libel ? A.—I had an interview with Mr. Verren a little before the book was puplished, Q—Did Mr. V. make any kind professions or feelings towards you ? A.—Thave had two interviews with Mr. Verven ; at this time the conduct of Mr. Verren changed toward me ; his church was burned at this time—I went to his house to enquire relative to his family. as there was no ac- knowledgea reement between us; [ met him in Broadway ; Mr Verren spoke first ; he spoke with great respect ; this was two months before the publication of the book ; there sppeared to be a change im his conduct ; I told him that I had lived during the winter in the family of James Campbell in Brooklyn; in consequence of a mes- sxge that T understood had been left for me I went to see Mr. Verren afterwards ; this was afew days after 1 saw him in Broadway ; I went to see him and he told me that afamily in Brolway wished for an instructress ; he said the name was Zimmermen a friendof the Dutoh Consul; be declined giving me a note‘but 1 went to see the famil hod noother interview with him ; | wrote to him and his wife replied to the note, (A paper here shown witness in the hand-writing of Mad. Verren j proved by witness.) Counsel for defence here asked to see it, which was re- tused at first, but the Attorney General finally acceded to the request. Cross-examined by defence—I was called as a witness on the former trial 1 was prevented giving all my answers, having been ‘stopped every minute by the interpreter—i not knowing anything about the anonymous letter—the only one that I knew any thing about was the one sent to Madame Brunel—Bartelemy afterwards showed me the letters—F have since seen these letters in an ecclesinstical court—this was about three weeks before the publication ofthe book—it was then that I wrote the letter to Mr. Verren, and I told Mr. Bartelemy that I had written it—T wrote to him because I'trembled for his position as to the ublication—I saw De Bullion at the Grand Jury—have Raa no corivefkation with him since—have had conversa- tion with Bartelemy since at his house, for the purpose of being informed of the situation T was in—there was some difeulty growing out of the politeness of De Bullion while I was with him, but more particularly with his wife—De Bullion never threatened violence to me—I never com- plained of DeBuilion’s interference with my school, nor of my interference with his, as we hadno school—he ne~ ver Lin pon to my knowledge—whenever I endeavor- ed to make peace petween De Bullion and his wife he ill meated mé—I have complained to Mr. Verren of their con- duct, and said that it was not a fit house for me to be in—at one time I had an intention to leave the house, but feari it would not be pleasont to Mr. Verren, T remained—I di the house after I left it, but had a profouna con- tempt for the wife of De Bullion—but not for him. Court took a recess. ‘Tue Count resumen tts Skstron —At the opening of the court, Mr. Maxwets. stated that they did not wish to proceod with the cross-examination of Madame De Le Haye, who was on the stand asa witness, at thi he Artonnxy Genena then stated that he wished to inquire more particularly as to thé reasons why she did not state on her former examination, all she has told on this? A.—I was very much troubled and excited at the tim Q—Why did you not detail the different conversations you had with Mr. Verren? And did you not attempt to go on and state, and was you not checked by your inter- A—In paying certain things, my interpreter said, “Do not say that, 1 Wont't repeat it.” How (lo you mean to be understood by the jury wontying to Mr. Bortelemy a’ to what course you shoul pursue "A —=My object was to ‘know whether the frinl was to come on oF not, av l had some intentions to go to France. Maname Bayete was called by propocutlon, k= prove that she had received a copy of the four letters which she said she showed to Madame De La Haye, who tore it up. She could not tell positively whether it was the same as the copy before her or not, it was so long ago. Gurtay Meee was called to tesfify as to the mannerin which the interpretations were made on the previous trial, but the question was overruled ‘The Artonser Gasenat. called De Bullion again, when Mr. Maxwell stated that his assistant counsel was absent, as also his client, who he understood had been sent for to rotect his wife, who had been instilted by some one who iad went to the house to do so in matters relative to this trial , he hoped the Attorney General would therefore wait a few moments—es he was concluding they came ifte court. De Betton examined by prosécution.—Q.—Have ever seen these papers (handing him the written by Mr. Verren™ wife.) a re in the hand-writing of Mr. Verren’s wife ; I saw this letter in his study three or four weeks after Mr, Verren had given mé thé antionymous létters ; thié was in. summer time ; I mét him on the and he saidto me 1 am aring some letters against De yey and you call to-morrow. ' He took the letters and on the table, and éritrustéd His wife to make ‘them ; when she had LAs ae od the ¥opies, he ke e Is he then gave me © cap lea e then ch: me to make copies of them, he ‘then told me to put the firet one headed“ Fellow citizens,” on the door of Miss De La Haye during the night, so that'the public might soe it; the second was to be sent to Mre. Davis through the post office’; I did not end it ; in the wintertime, he to! me to pat up another on her door; T tetarned to Mr. Verren, and’he told me that in advised iy to send ain im lo sen é . “the advised me to carry ‘hell ; ter myself to her door, and leave it after rin bares 1 did not wish to go for fear of Being seen ; he to! ide -sélf, And buy a pair of mustachios and put to my lips, « long’ pair, so that they would not know me ; he told me'to goto ph #iid nos he afraid of be ir'maker ant get them male; T told tol rae fo Ro ta al mee ek go ho id ‘ot, and At my pfoposal the ony ers paper that De Bullion dfleged ee RAMEE net et ‘on "Mins De La Blaye's door ik with being Peat ee and @ woman of ye a nldo read the léttor whieh was to have been Mre. Davis, which was written in French. i ‘may that wri- ther he 7 "A. —N6—not Byfthe hand-writing, bat by the héart of the letter.