Grand Rapids Herald-Review Newspaper, February 21, 1912, Page 17

Notice of Expiration of Redemption. “Office of County Auditor, County of | Itasca, State of Minnesota. 1 To Mary Hudson: You are hereby notified that at a tax sale of unredeemed lands held on the, 14th day of November, 1910, the fol- lowing described parcel of land, situ-}{ ated in the county of Itasca, State of Minnesota to-wit: Lot 10, Block 9, Plat of Laprairie was sold for the sum of Eleven and 35-100 Dollars ($11.35); that the amount required to redeem said Parcel, exclusive of the costs to accrue upon this notice, is the sum of Eleven | and 25-100 Dollars ($11.35) and interest as provided by law from said 14th day of November, 1910, to the day such redemption is made; and that the tax certificate issued upon said sale has been presented to me by the holder thereof, and the time for redemption of | said parcel from said sale will expire sixty (60) days after the service of} this notice and proof thereof has been} filed in my office. | Witness my hand and official seal) this 5th day of February, 1912. | (Official Seal) j M. A. SPANG, | Auditor of Itasca County, Minnesota. HE R Feby 14-28 | i | NOTICE OF SEALED BIDS Sealed bids will be received by cies board of county commissioners of Itasca county, Minnesota, up until 10 o'clock | a.m. on Thursday the 29th day of | February, 1912, at the office of the county auditor at the county court house in the village of Grand Rapids, | in said county, for the construction of a | wooden bridge across the Bigfork river | in township 62, range 25, at the point | where county road number 28! crosses said river, said bridge to be con- constructed according to the plans and specifications on file in the office of the county auditor of said county and in the office of C. Zerkel, village clerk of the village of Bigfork in sald county. The board reserves the right to ject any or all bids. M. A. SPANG, Auditor, Itasca County. H.R. & I. Feb. 7, 14, 21. | re- Summons State of Minnesota, County of Itasca —ss. District Court, Fifteenth Judi- eial District. Eugene L. Trask, vs. William M. Harrison, Charles A. Smith, James Gill, George Warren, W. A. Dafter, John Martin, Louis St. Germain, William Chandle:, Miranda Descent, Mary A. Cole, Ruby Mulvey, Louise Parcher, Jennie Bradford, H. W. Bradford, Lora B. Bradford, Bertha Bradford, Lyle Bradford, Myron Bradford, James Gile, also all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, lien or interest in the real estate describea in the complaint herein. Defendants. The State of Minnesota, To the above named Defendants. You are hereby summoned and re- quired to answer the complaint of the plaintiff in the above entitled action, which complaint has been filed in the office of the Clerk of said District Court at the village of Grand Rapids, County of Itasca and State of Minnesota, and to serve a copy of your answer to said complaint on the subscriber at his office in the Village of Princeton in the County of Mille Lacs within twenty (20) days after service of this summons upon you exclusive of the day of such service: and if you fail to answer the said complaint within the time afore- said the plaintiff in this action will apply to the Court for the relief de- manded in said complaint together with plaintiff’s ccsts and disburse- ments herein. t CHARLES KEITH, Plaintiff's Attorney, Princeton, Minn. Plaintiff. Notice of Lis Pendens i State of Minnesota, County of Itasca —SS. District Court, Fifteenth Judi- cial District. { Eugene L. Trask, Plaintiff. vs. William M. Harrison, Charles A. Smith, James Gill, George Warren, ‘W. A. Dafter, John Martin, Louis St. Germain, William Chandler, Miranda Descent, Mary A. Cole, Ruby Mulvey, Louise Parcher, Jennie Bradford, H. W. Bradford, Lora B. Bradford, Bertha Bradford, . Lyle Bradford, Myron Bradford, Hl James Gile, also all other persons : or parties unknown claiming any Kc right, title, estate, lien or interest | in the real estate described in the { complaint herein. Defendants. Notice is hereby given that an ac- tion has been commenced in this Court by the above named piaintiff against the above named defendants. That the object of said action is to determine | the adverse claim of the defendants and each and all of them, and the rights Notice of Hearing on | west quarter of section twenty-six (26), | February, 1912, at 8 o’clock P. M. 7 = 29 Be aR TT RR ORE aT NE The northeast quarter of the south- east quarter of section thirty-three (33), ‘Township fifty-five (55), Range Twen-| were appointed Judges and J. A. Davis ty-five (25): Lot One (1), or north- east quarter of the northeast quarter of Section One(1), Township fifty-five (55), Range twenty-two (22): the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Sec- tion Nine (9), Township fifty-six (56), Range Twenty-five (25): the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter, the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter, and the west halt of the south- west quarter of Section twenty-two (22): also the northeast quarter of the north- township fifty-eight (68), Range twen- ty-four (24): the south half of the northeast quarter, and the east half of the northwest quarter of section twenty-two, also the southea.t quarter of the northeast quarter of Section thir- ty-five (35), township sixty (60), range | twenty-three (23). CHARLES KEITH, Plaintiff's Attorney, Princeton, Minn. Jan. 24 Feb 28 OFFICIAL PROCEEDI OF THE Village Council Grand Rapids Grand Rapids, Minn. February 12th, 1912. A regular meeting of the village coun- cil of the Village of Grand Rapids, Itasca County, Minnesota, was held at the Council Chambers in the Village Hall in said Village this 12th day of Present: President Bossard, Trus- tee Arscott and Recorder Sherman. | The minutes of the three previous meetings were read and approved. Monthly reports of Justice of the Peace Bailey and Village Treasurer Mc- Mahon were read, approved and ordered filed, Village Attorney Price presented a communication from Rudolph 8. Blome & Co., relative to their contract for the paving of Kindred Avenue. ried, C. L. Pratt and Emil Litchke was appointed Clerk of the annual Vil- lage election to be held Tuesday, March| 12th, 1912. ‘The following bills were audited and allowed: Mesaba Telephone Co., phone rent- Walter S. Booth & Sons, Manuels and Blanks .. 2-2 .. -. +. «+ 7.00 A. L. LaFreniere, Publishing Pro- E C. Kiley, Publishing proceed- Geo. Riddell, blacksmithing and repairing 2.665660 23004 eee Se 2088 John Beckfelt, typewriter paper OE ek ee. Ca Re SMe Sep S Cc. W. Forrest, plowing sidewalks and hauling hese .. .. .. .. «. +. 440 John Costello, 1% cords dry hard- bh a ge era Ta ORE A W. J. & H. D. Powers, one door 1 el RR Capos ng RT ot MPR Mra RS S. R. H. Bailey, Justice fees .. .. 2.00 Upon motion the meeting adjourned. A. C. BOSSARD, Village President. Attest; FRANK SHERMAN, Village Recorder. Notice for Publication. Department of the Interior, U. S. Land Office at Cass Lake, Min- nesota. Jan, 19, 1912. | Notice is hereby given that Claud J. Jones, Son and one of the heirs, of William B. Jones deceased, who on November 3rd, 1905, made Home- | stead Entry No. 842, Serial No. 01867,' for NW% NE% and NE% NW% Section 30, Township 52 N. of Range 24 W, 4th Principal Meridian, has filed notice of intention to make Final Five year proof, to establish claim to the land above described, before I. D. Rassmussen, Clerk of District Court at his office, at Grand |Rapids, Minn., on the 14th day of March, 1912. “ Claimant names as witnesses: Albert N. Phillips, John ‘V. Daly, Rass Rasmussen and Jacob S. Gole, all of Grand Rapids, Minn. LESTER BAhTLETT, Register. Jan. 31—March 13. Citation for Hearing on Final Account | and for Distribution. Estate of Nathias Washburn. The following Resolution was _ intro- d by Trustee Arscott and s:conded | vorder Sherman: | “Whereas,” the Village of Grana | Rapids on or about the 15th day of; Setpember, A. D. 1909, entered into a! written contract with Rudolph S. Blome Company, of Chicago, [linois, for the performing of certain public work | for said Village of Grand Rapids, in- cluding the paving, grading, excavat-/ ing, curbing and guttering of Kindred Avenue, in said Village from the north ; side of Second Street to the. south side of Fourth Street, and other details} therein specified, and forming said | contract is now in full force and effect. | And, Whereas, the said Rudolph S. | Blome Company duly executed its bond | to the Village of “rand Rapids with the National Surety Company, a corporation, , as surety, for the faithful performance | and fulfilment of said contract. And, Whereas, the said Rudolph S. Blome & Company has never attempted | to enter into and upon said contract or in any manner attemptea to per- form and fulfil the terms and conditions thereof, in accordance with the true | tenor of the said contract. And, Whereas, the said Rudolph S. Blome & Company has consented to; the cancellation of the said conrtcat for | the performance of the said work above specified, which said cancellation shall take place at the instance of said Vil- | lage of Grand Rapids, without in any way rendering said Village liable to} answer to the said Rudolph S. Blome & Company in damages in any sum or amount whatever for the cancellation of the said contract. ' Therefore, Be It Resolved, That the contract heretofore entered into and dated on or about the 15th day of Sep- tember, A. D. 1909, by and between the Village of Grand Rapids, a Muni- cipal corporation, of the one part, and Rudolph S. Blome & Company, a co- ‘justment and allowance of seid final | why said petition should not be granted. | the seal of said court, this 3rd day of | board of ‘State of Minnesota, County of Itasca, In Probate Court: In the matter of the estate of Nathias Washburn, Decedent. The State of Minnesota t« Electa M. Washburn, Wilbert Washburn, Seymour Washburn, Elmer Washburn, Henry C. Washburn, Rosa A. French, Delia Bai- ley, Belle Bowen and all persons in- terested in the final account and dis- tribution of the estate ot said decedent: The representative of the above named decedent, having filed in this court his final account of the administration of the estate of said decedent, together with his petition praying for the ad- account and for distribution of the resi- due of said estate to the persons there- unto entitled; Therefore, You and Each of You, are hereby cited and re- quired to show cause, if any you have, before this court at the Probate Court Rooms in the Court House, in the Vil- lage of Grand Rapids, in the County cf, Itasca, State of Minnesota, on the Ist day of March, 1912, at 10 o’clock A. M; * Witness, the Judge of said Court, and February, 1912. CLARENCE B. WEBSTER,| (Court Seal) Probate Judge H. R. Feby 7-14-21 NOTICE OF SEALED BIDS Sealed bids will be received by the county commissioners of Itasca county, Minnesota, up until 10 o'clock a. m. on Thursday the 29th day of February, 1912. at the office of the county auditor, at the county court house in the village of Grand Rapids, in said county for the construction of a wooden bridge.across the Bowstring river and at the point where the Spring lake read crosses said river in section 7, township 148, range 26, said bridge to partnership, of the other part, be, and the same is hereby cancelled, and all parties thereto forever freed and re- lieved from any and all liability one to the other under the terms of said contract, and the bond heretofore enter- ed into by the said Rudolph S.. Blome & Company with the National Surety Company, as surety, for them, be, and the same is hereby vacated, cancelled and surrendered. Upon roll call, the following voted aye: Trustee Arscott, Recorder Sher- , Petition for Survey. WHEREAS, a petition has been presented to the Board of County Com- i missioners of Itasca County, Minnesota, asking that said Board shall cause to be surveyed, located and staked out all section and property lines pertaining | to Section 4, Township 150, Range 28, Itasca County, Minnesota. Now, therefore, notice is hereby given that a hearing on said petition vs. Frank R. Stoughton and ail other be constructed according to plans and specifications on file in the office of the county auditor of said county and inthe office of J. M. Draper, town clerk of the town of Sand Lake in said county. The board reserves the right to reject any or all bids. « M. A. SPANG, County Auditor. Itasca County. H.R. & IL. Feb. 7, 14, 21. Summons, State of Minnesota, County of Itas- ca—In the District Court, 15th Judi cial District. L. M. Mann Land Company, Plaintiff, persons unknown ; State of Minnescta, County of Itas- ; a the defendants herein from hav or claiming any right title, o: in or lien upon suid rea: this 9th day of June, A. Lb WM. N. M. CRAWFORD, R. G. PATTON, Attorneys for Complainant, 614 Metropolitan Life Building. Minneapolis, Minn | Notice of Lis Pendens. | State of Minnesota, County of Itas. | ca—in the District Court, 15th Judicial District. L. M. Mann Land Company Plaintiff, vs. Frank R. Stoughton and ali other persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. | Notice is hereby given that an ac- tion has been commencei and is now pending in the above named Court by the above named Plaintiff against the above named defendants. the object of which is to obtain a judgment that the plaintiiff is the owner in fee simple of the North half of hte Northeast quarter and the Northeast quarter of the North. west quarter in Section 20, Township 61, Range 23, in Itasca County, Min- nesota, and that the defendants and each of them heve no right, title, estate or interest therein or lien thereon. Dated this 18th day of January A D. 1912. WM. N. M. CRAWFORD, R. G. PATTON, Attorneys for Complainant. 614 Metropolitan Life Bidg. Minneapolis, Minnesota H. R. Jan. 24 Feby 28 State of Minnesota, County of Itas- ca. In District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District. J. N. Gayner, C. W. Wagner, Plain- tiffs. vs. i William Morrison, William Mullikin, Charles A. Moore, William T. Sin- clair, William T. Bailey, Morris Thomes, Donald McDonald, Sheldon, Janet N. Holman, Wm. B. Holman, Matthew A. Spang, Hugh McEwen, also all cther persons un- known claiming any right, title, es- tate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. The State of Minnesota to the above Named Defendants: | You and each of you, are hereby! summoned and required to answer | the complaint of the plaintiffs here- in, which complaint has been filed in the office of the Clerk of said Dis- trict Court, in the County of Itasca, State of Minnesota, and to serve a; of your answer to the said com- plaint upon the subscriber, at his office in the Village of Litchfield, Minnesota, within Twenty (20) days after the service of this summons up-} on you, exclusive of the day of ser-/| vice; and if you fail to answer said complaint within the time aforesaid,’ the plaintiffs in this action will apply, to the Court for the relief demanded in said complaint, together with the costs and disbursements of this ac- tion. J. N. GAYNER, Attorney for Plaintiffs, | Litchfield, Minnesota. Dated January 24, 1912. ca, { In District Court, Fifteenth Judicial | District. N. Gayner, C. W. Wagner, Plain- | tiffs, J. vs. William Morrison, William Mullikin, | Charles A. Moore, William T. Sin- | clair, William T. Bailey, Morris | Thomas, Donald McDonald, F. P.| Sheldon, Janet N. Holman, Wm B. Holman, Matthew A. Spang, Hugh McEwen, also all other persons un- known claiming any right, title, es- tate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein, Defendants. Lis Pendens. Notice is hereby given, that an action has been commenced in this Court by the above named plaintiffs | against the above named defendants, the object of which is to obtain a judgment that said plaintiffs are the owners in fee of the following de- scribed real property and that the!) defendants and each of them, have| no estate or interest therein, or lien thereon. The premises described in the com plaint and involved in said action are, situated in the County of Itasca, State of Minnesota, and described as follows, to-wit: The North West Quarter (N.W.%), of North West Quarter (N.W.%),| of Section Twenty Nine (29), of Township Sixty Two (62) N, of Range Twenty Three (23), W; of the | this 5th day of February 1912. | D. 1901, for said County of Itasca, F. P.j piece or parcel was subject to be sold |redemption from said tax sale of said |property given and served. will be granted at a meeting of said board to be held at the county court house, in the village of Grand Rapids, on the 29th day of February, 1912, at 10 o’clock a. m. The owners of the lands to be affected by such survey as | they appear on the latest tax duplicates are as follows: Name Subdivision of Section Albert P. Woods, lot 1 .. -. +. -- oe ee oe oe Delby D. Fredrick, lot 2 .. +. «+ ++ ++ Delby D. Frederick, SW% of NEX% Geo. S. Eddy, SE% of NE% «. «. ++ + D. R. Guptill, E% of Lot 3. ewe ee ee oes Charles C. Parmeter, W% of Lot 3 .. John J. Dripps, Lot 4 .. Lee R. Guptill, SW% of NWK.. .. +. - D. R., Guptill, BX of SEX of NW%.. -. -. -. .- Charles C. Parmeter, W% of SE% ofNWK .. .. . Harriet A. Christianson, W. 10 rds. Lot 7 .. Charles C. Parmeter, E. 10 rods of W 20 rds., Lot 7 .. 30 rds. Lot 7 .. .. .. ; laint Notice of Expiration of Redemption. jing, in the City of Minneapolis, in _the County of Hennepin, State of right, title, estate, interest, or lien | 4th, P. M., in the County of Itasca, in the real estate described in the | State of Minnesota, complaint herein, Defendants. Notice is further given, That no The State of Minnesota to the Above | Personal claims is made against said Named Defendants: Snes or either of them in said You are hereby summoned n. quired to answer the peta oe Dated January 25, 1912. the plaintiff in the above entitled J. N. GAYNER, action, which complaint is on file Attorney for Plaintiffs, in the office of the Clerk of the Litchfield, Minnesota. above named Court, and to serve|@. R. H-R Jan 31 March 6 a copy of your answer to the said Itasca, State of Minnesota. To John Craig: | You are hereby notified that at a tax |exclusive of the day of such service; 7 day such redemption is made; and ane| the tax certificate issued upon said sale has been presented to me by the holder -thereof, and the time for re- demption of said parcel from said sale will expire sixty (60) days after the service of this noticé and proof thereof has been filed in my office. Witness my hand and official seal M. A. SPANG, i Auditor of Itasca i County, Minnesota. | (Official Seal) | H R Feby 7-21 Forfeited Tax Sale. ' Office of County Auditor, County of Itasca, State of Minnesota. Notice of Expiration of Redemption. To James Prescott: You are hereby notified that the fol-| lowing pieces or parcels of land, situ- ated in the County of Itasca, State of Minnesota, and known and described as | follows, to-wit: NE of SW%, SE! of SW%, NW% of SE%, Section 22, Township 58, Range 22, are now as- sessed in your name. That on the 12th day of May, A. D. 1902, at a sale of land pursuant to the real estate tax judgment duly given and made in and by the District Court in and for said County of Itasca, on the 21st day cf March A. D. 1902, in} proceedings to enforce the payment of taxes delinquent upon real estate for the year A. D. 1900, for said County of Itasca, the NEX of SW%, SEX of SW%, Section 22, Township 58, Range 22, were duly offered for sale, and no ome bidding upon said offer an amount equal to that for which said pieces or parcels were subject to be sold, to-wit: the sum of One and 96-100 Dollars for NE of SW, and Five and 19-100 Dollars for SE% of SW%, all in Sec- tion 22, Township 58, Range 22, the same were duly bid in for the’ State of Minnesota for said sums. That on the 11th day of May, A. D. 1903, at a sale of land pursuant to the real estate tax judgment duly given and made in and by the District Court in and for said County of Itasca, on the 21st day of March A. D. 1903 in proceedings to enforce the payment of taxes delin- quent upon real estate for the year A, the; NW% of SEX, Section 22, Township 58, Range 22, was duly offered for sale, and no one bidding upon said offer an amount equal to that for which said to-wit: the sum of Five and 34-100 Dol- | lars, the same was duly bid in for the! State of Minnesota for said sum. That thereafter, and on the 9th day} of November, A. D. 1908, the said pieces or parcels of land, not then having been redeemed from said sale, and having then become the absolute property of the State of Minnesota, were sold and conveyed at public sale by the County Auditor of said County pursuant to the order and direction of the State Auditor of the State of Min- nesota, and in accordance with the provisions of the statute in such case made and provided, for the sum of sev- en and 34-100 dollars, for the NE% of SW; ten and 18-100 dollars for the SE% of SW; ten and 18-100 dollars for the NW% of SE%, all in section 22, township 58, Range 22. The amounts) for which the above land was sold were duly paid to the County Treasurer of said County. That the certificates of sales for said pieces or parcels of land executed and delivered by said County Auditor upon said sales last abeve mentioned has been presented to me at my office by the holder thereof for the purpose of having notice of expiration of time for That the amounts required to redeem said pieces o: parcels of land from said tax sales at the date of this notice, exclusive of the costs to accrue upon said notice, is the sum of ten and 21-100 dollars for the NE% of SW%; fourteen and 15-100 dollars for the SE% of SW%; fourteen | and 15-100 dollars for the NW% of SE% | |the other under the terms District. ; J. N. Gayner, C. W. Wagner, Plain- tiffs. vs. Thecdore Lucas, Patrick M. Agnew, Donald McDonald, Wiiliam Deary, F. P. Sheldon, Janet N. Holmen, Wm. B. Holman, Matthew A. Spang Hugh McEwen, also ai] other per- sons unknown claiming any right, litle, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the com- plaint herein, Defendants. Lis Pendens. Notice is hereby given, that an action has been commenced in this Court by the above named plaintiffs against the above named defendants, j the object of which is to obtam a | judgment that said plaintiffs are the owners in fee of the following de- |seribed real property and that the defendants and each of them, have ; 0 estate or interest therein, or lien thereon. The premises described in the complaint and involved in saia action are situated in the County of Itasca, State of Mimnesota, and described as follows, to-wit: The Southwest Quarter (S.W.%), of the South East Quarter (S.H.%4) of Section Nineteen (19), in the Township Sixty Two (62), N. of Range Twenty Three (23), W. of the 4th P. M., in the County of Itasca, State of Minnesota, Notice is further given, That no personal claim is made against said defendants, or eithe: of them in said action. Dated January 25th, 1912 J. N. GAYNER. Attorney for Plaintiffs Litchfield, Minnesota. H. R. Jan 31 March 6 Resolution. The following Resolution was intro- duced by Trustee Arscott and seconded by Recorder Sherman. + Whereas, the Village of Grand Rapids on or about the 15th day of September, A. D. 1909, entered into a written con- j tract with Rudolph S. Blome & Com- pany, of Chicago, Illinois, for the per- forming of certain public work for said Village of Grand Rapids, including the paving, grading, excavating, curbing and guttering of Kindred Avenue, in said Village, on the North side of Second Street to the South side of Fourth Street, and other details therein speci- fied and forming said contract, is now in full force and effect. And, Whereas, the said Rudolph —S. Blome & Company duly executed its bond to the Village of Grand Rapids with the National Surety Company, a corporation, as surety, for the faith- ful performance and fulfilment of said contract. And, Whereas, the said Rudolph 8. Blome & Company has never attempted to enter into and upon the said con- tract or in any manner attempted to Perform and fulfil the terms and con- ditions thereof, in accordance with the true tenor of the said contract. And, Whereas, the said Rudoiph 3. Blome & Company has consented to the cancellation of the said contract for the performance of the said work above specified, which said cancellation shall take place at the instance of said Vil- lage of Grand Rapids, without in any way rendering said Village liable te answer to the said Rudolph S. Blome & Company in damages in any sum or amount whatever for the cancellation of the said contract. Therefore, Be it Resolved, That the contract heretofore entered into and dated on or about the 15th day of Sep- tember, A. D. 1909, by and between the Village of Grand Rapids, a Municipal corporation, of the one part, and Ru- doiph S. Blome & Company, a co- partnership, of the other part, be, and the same is hereby cancelled, and all parties thereto forever freed and re- lieved from any and all liability one to of said con- tract, and the bond heretofore entered into by the said Rudolph S. Blome & Company with the National Surety all in section 22, township 58, 1ange 22, | and interest as provided by law to the} day such redemption is made. | That the time for the redemption of | said pieces or parcels of land from said | tax sales will expire sixty (60) days af- | ter service of this notice and the filing | Company, as surety, for them, be, and the same is hereby vacated, cancelled and surrendered. Upon roll call, the following voted aye: Trustee Arscott, Recorder Sher- man, President Bossard. Absent, Trustees Russell and King. of proof of such service in my office. | Witness, my hand and seal of office | this Ist day of February, A. D., 1912. j M. A. SPANG, Auditor, Itasca coun- | ty, Minnesota. | (Seal.) | By JNO. E, MeMAHON, Deputy. Fe State of Minnesota, County of Itas- ca—ss. In District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District. | J. N. Gayner and C. W. Wagner,) Plaintiffs, vs. Theodore Lucas, Patrick M Agnew,/| Donald McDonald, William Deary, F. P. Sheldon, Janet N. Holman, Wm. B. Holman, Matthew A. Span Hugh McEwen, also all other per- song unknown claiming any right, title, estate interest, or lien in the real estate described in the com- plaint herein, Defendants. The State of Minnesota, To the above named Defendant: You are hereby summoned and re- quired to answer the complaint of the Plaintiff in the above entitled action, of which a copy is hereto annexed and herewith served upon you, and to serve a copy of your an- swer to the’ said complaint on the subscriber, at his office in the Vil- lage in Litchfield, Minnesota, in said County, within 20 days after the! service of this Summons upon you, | and if you fail so to serve your an- swer to the said complaint within Minnesota, wihtin twenty days after sale of unredeemed lands held on the 14th day of November, 191, the fol- lowing described parcel of land, situ- ; in the county. of Itasca, State of Minnesota to-wit: Lot 7, Block 9, the time aforesaid, the Plaintiffs in this action will apply to the Court for the relief demanded in the com- plaint. Dated January 25th, 1912. J, N. GAYNER, : Plaintiff's Attorney Litchfield. Minn. — A. C. BOSSARD, President. Attest: FRANK SHERMAN, Village Recorder. Notice of Execution Sale. State of Minnesota, County of Itas ca—District Court, 15th Judicial District. James Peterson, Plaintiff, vs. Peter Peterson, Defendant. Notice is hereby given, that under and pursuant to an execution, direct- ed and delivered to me, issued out of the district court of Itasca coua- ty, Minnesota, on a judgment duly entered and docketed therein on the Sth day of January, 1912, in fa- vor of the plaintiff above named and against the defendant above named for the sum of $447.45, I have levied on, and on the ninth (9th) day of March, 1912, at ten (10) o’clock im the forenoon, at the front door of the county court house building im the village of Grand Rapids, in said county, I will sell at public vendue to the highest biidder for cash, to satisfy the amount due on said judg- ment, interest, and the costs and ex- penses of sale, the following de scribed lands and all the right, title, and interest of the judgment debtor therein, the same being situated im Itasea county, Minnesota, to-wit: Lot four (4) in section four (4) im township fifty-five (55), ncrth, of range twenty-two (22), west of 4th |P. M., according to hte government survey. Dated January 22, 1912. T. T, RILEY, Sheriff of Itasca County. THWING & ROSSMAN, : Attorneys for Judgment Creditor, Grand Rapids, Minnesota. H.R. Jan. 24-Feb 28 pasture land, either wild or clear, WANTED AT ONCE—40 acres of 3 ia a eetenetll baie ali, Deere even —>