Grand Rapids Herald-Review Newspaper, December 8, 1906, Page 4

FROM A FARME Urges Attendance of Citizens at the Forthcoming Institute. THE WECESSITY OF EDUCATI A:Herald-Review Reader Takes Up a Subject of Interest to Every Farmer and Discusses It In an Intelligent Manner: in your issue of December 1, I note the announcement of the Farmers Institute to be beld in Grand Rapids on the 14th inst. 1 would be pleased to state that in my opinion the Com- mercial club could make no move tbat would result in more good, nor insure yreater material prosperity than the one they have taken in the interest of the farmer. ‘ Itasca county contains unlimited wealth in iron and timber, but after all these industries do aot lay as deep and lasting foundations for the generations to come nor do they gvaraptee such permanent prosperity and happiness as does the tilling of the soil. But in farming, as io all other industries and professions, it requires brains as well as muscle. We a‘ivance in art, science and civil- ization only to the extent we take advantage of the forces of nature. To no other human endeavor is this role more applicable than to farming. Experience is the great lever that moves the universe. Experience more than a century and a quarter ago laid the foundation of the greate est government that ever existed— the United States. People came here from every civilized country in the world and brought with them their experiences of government, and wiked iv over with their neighbors before the Blazing fireside, in the little town meetings, in the stores, in every nook and corner of the col- enies was the alleabsorbing subject ef government discussed. The ideas of an independent goverument did not eminate from the brain of one Man ner ove community, nor one assembly, but was uniformily thought out and the wheels of government set in motion by the experience and con- certed efforts of all the people. And so it is with (farming. One man @oesn’t know it all, but one man knows something that other men don’t know, that will be a benefit for tbe other man to learn, The Farmers Institute will, if the furmers take as much interest in it as the Commer- cial club is’ doing, result in great benefit to this part of the state. We may not at once realize the good of | wil! be the last in which the citizens it but it’s only a matter of time till vhe favorable results will show up. There was a time in South Dakota when a loose, careless method of farming was carried on and as a re- sult the state became almost depopu- Jated. This was from ’83 to “M4. It seemed vo he the height of everyone's ambition to get into crop a large acreage. You-would often hear the farmer boast how many acres of ground they ploughed, dragged and sowed in a certain period of time. At one time it was the habit to dise stubble grounds into corps. That was the fastest way, but proved the least profitable, for the reason that thistles would get ahead of the grain | and choke it out. uring the eleven years of this haphazard way of farm- ing South Dakota was subject to all iNs imeginable. There was the drought, bot winds, hail storms, early and late frosts, chinch bugs, grass- hoppers, weavel, Russian thistles, wild mustard, wild oats, foul seeds of every name and description, and the blues, and lots of calamity howl- ing. It seemed as if the people were wheat mad, for they didn’t try to raise much of anything else. A farmer would have in 600 to 1,000 acres of wheat and not a hill of coro or potato nor any other garden stuff. Everything almost entirely depended upon the wheat crop. If I remember rigbt, in the summer of 1894 the first farmers institute was held in Brown county, South Dakota, and I ‘also remember it took quite an effort to induce the farmers to attend the meetings. The Brookings Agricul- tural college sent Prof. Wheaton of the dairy department and men from other branches of the college were sent to instruct the farmers in the adaptability of the soil to the differ- ent grasses and grain crops, and the different methods of destroying the Russian thistle. They all agreed and with one accord set out augerate a different methcd, and so they did. “Instead of putting in 600 acres of wheat, they would put in 150 acres, 50 acres of oats, 20 of Barley, 30 of corn, five of potatoes. From the time the first institute was held to this day South Dakota has prospered. There is no question about it. The instructions to the farmers of South Dakota by experienced farmers and the instructors sent out by the Brook- ings Agricultural school ‘is what put the nuw famous prairie state on its feet. Mr. J. J. Hill was right when he said the farmers do uot realize one half the profit that’s possible to be derived from an acre of ground. Last fall I was among some of the farmers in the vicinity of Crookston and they put me in mind of the South Dakota farmers of early days when scientific work set in. I recall to mind one man, five miles from ‘| Crookston, who had bought an 800 acre farm tbree years before, made a paynient down, the balance on time. He had a barn full of horses but only a few head of.cattle. He had several self binders and lots of other farm tools. 1 sized up matters in my own mind and saw his finish in less than three years, unless he came to his senses and changed bis methods. Back of the barn, which was on the bank of a creek, was a pile of manure that had been accumulating for years. His predecessor had been farming the same way, and when his farm got so foul and run down that he couldn’t make a living, he sold. This farmer got eight bushels per acre of third grade wheat from 500 acres, or 4,000 bushels in all. Suppose he expended one half the labor and money on 100 acres of ground io haul- ing out the manure that was going to waste. It is safe to say that 2,000 loads, which would have given 20 loads to the acre on the 100 acres. would have insured a field of 40 bushels of Nu. 1, Northern wheat or 4,000 bushels. The other 400 acres could have a change by summer fol- lowing part and putting coro and potatoes on part and the next year be in condition to insure a yield of at least thirty bushels per acre, which would be 12,000 bushels on 400 acres instead of 4,000 bushels on 500 acres, asa result of a little forethought. Some farmers in this county are fall- ing into the same rus. They think they have to clear up a whole quarter section in order to make a big showing, but in my opinion it’s net so much the amount of land cleared tbat pays the best but it’s farming what you have al- ready cleied scientitically-and so as to get the best possible results frum every foot cleared. One acre farmed good is far more profitable thin 10 acres poorly farmed. These” are “all matters that ought to be discussed at the institute and I earnestly hope every farmer and homesteader in Itagea county will be present on the l4inst. It’s time and money weil spent. A FARMER. The Koochiching County Boys. The present term cf district court of the north half of Itasca county will take ao official part. The new county of Kuochiching will have been organized and in working order by next June and hereafter the towns and territory along the northern | border will supply Itasca county with {no more jurymen, witnesses or crimi- inal litigation. But they are a fine lot of fellows and while here on offi- lial business in connection with cout matters bave invariable made friends, It is with a sincere feeling of regret that the Herald-Review comes to the | parting of the ways with the good peo- | ple that will hereafter be the moying ‘spirits of the new county. While it is for the material benefit of both sections to separate for county gove ernment, it seems like the parting of old-time friendships and suc4 part- ings are never without regrets. Five north end citizens are iv attendance at the present term of court. They are a jolly and prosperous appearing quintet, just such men as will add strength to the new county organiza- tiou and insure its successful launcl+ ing on the Minnesota political sea, Mitchell Burton is a successful and enterprising dry goods merchant of Interuational Falls whois here as a grand juryman; Ole Wold is one of {the prominent homesteaders in the Ratroot region; Mr. Cingmars an] Levi Wilson were also members of the late grand jury. W. J. Paulman, our former townsman, is serving as a petit juryman. It is twelve years since Mr. Paulman left Grand Rapids to make his home at International Falle. He was.there almost at the start of of the town and has never lost faith in the ultimate growth to greatness of the place. There haye been some spare picking up there at times, but he always foresaw the time when International Falls would be a great manufacturing center with a population of many thousands of that something-in the mode of farm-} people. It begins to look as though ing was wrong; that it wasn’t the that time is closeat hand.” Mr. Paul- climate that caused the trouble, but} man owns some of the most valuable their own heedless way of farming. | real property in the town on which They talked these matters of interest | he has some very substantial improve- over with each uther, compared notes | ments. 3 ] Pio | neer Meat THOMAS FINNEGAN } Fresh and Salt Meats / We Carry Onty the Best that Can be Had. Our Special Brands of CANNED GOODS are the g best offered to the public. V $ Poultry, Game, Etc. Butter. Eggs, Cheese. } | | | aes eS EIEN % cpa Se = arket Prop. Lefaud Aveuue, Opposite Postoffice. November 17, 1906. 1906, by New York City. 4—The original Minneapolis. Notice to the Public 1-J. R. Moore ceased to be an agent of the AMERICAN REAL ESTATE COMPANY, of New York City, on 2—Moore Brothers & Compan no connection with the A. COMPANY, of New York City. 3—The ‘‘American Real Estate Company of Minneapolis, Minnesota, incorporated,’ organized November 22, ._R. Moore and others, hag no connection with the AMERICAN REAL ESTATE COMPANY, of MERICAN REAL ESTATE COMPANY, - bas been in business in New York since 1888, and its Eighteenth Annual Statement, Janua ssets of $8,364,909.97 and Surplus of $1,185,047. 03. 5—R. M. Thompson has been appointed Agent of this Company, with offices at 544 Security Ban American Real Estate Company 290 Broadway, New York City (J. R. Moore’s firm) have ERICAN REAL ESTATE Ist, 1906, shows Building, Notice G. A. R. There will be a regular meeting of B. F. Huson post on Saturday, De- cemver 29, 1906, at 3 o'clock in the afternoon, at which time the elec- tion of officers will take place. All comrades of the post are earnestly requested to be present. By order: Wm. WeEIrzeL, Com. H, 8. Huson, Adjv. ee Those new silk waists for ladies at Henry Hughes & Co., are beauties. They must be seen to be appreciated. Fancy sifk waists—the latest and most stylish—just received at Henry Hughes & Co. The ladies of, Grand Rapids and vicinity are invited to call. and see them. eee Children and Sleep. One of the greatest mistakes of parents and those who have charge ot children Is that ‘they are Mkely to allow the young ones too little time to sleep. With one excuse or anoth- er the youngsters are up later at night than they should be, and as they must be off to school betimes in the morning and there may be duties to perform they are called before they have finished their morning nap. Chil- dren, as a rule, ought to sleep ten or eleven hours, and to do this they must be put to bed early enough at night so that they may get this amount of uninterrupted rest.—Modern Wom- ep. Few Women Faint. It is a curious fact, of general re- mark, and observed not by physicians only, that fainting is less common han it used to be. It is rare that one sees a woman carried out of a church o~ theater, yet forty years ago it was a matter of such common occurrence as barely to excite remark. This is due in very great measure to the out- door life young women lead in these days of tennis and golf and _ other sports. The heart and the circulation are strengthened by exercise in the open air and it takes a great shock to disorder the blood balance in the body of the modern woman. Scared by the Sentence. When the late Judge Newton of Southboro presided over the court in Westboro, he had before him one day 8 poor and illiterate Frenchman ac- cused of selling liquor. As it was his first offense, he was fined $50. Evidently $50 was a fortune to the Frenchman, and it was also evident that he had a vague conception of the seriousness of his crime, for, turn- ing a startled look on the judge, he exclaimed in wild tones: “For God’s sake, judge, why didn’t yer hung me?” —Boston Herald. A Sick Room Hint. If hot applications are required for g@ person taken suddenly ill, wien the fire is out and there is no better con- venience for heating at hand, a lamp chimney fills the breach admirably. Light the lamp full head and in a twinkle the chimney is hot and ready for use when wrapped in a woolen cloth. <A stove lid answers the same purpese when the fire has been re- tained. Digging for Fish. The natives of certain parts of In dia are in the habit every year, in the summer, of digging the dry river hanks for fish, which they dig out by hundreds, just as they would pota- toes. The mud lumps are~ broken open, and the fish, perhaps 8-in. or i0-in. long, will always be found alive, ind often frisky, as if just removed ‘rom its supposedly native element -be water. : ‘ YOU CAN EASILY OPERATE THIS TYPEWRITER YOURSELF Don't worry oor correspon— nt. ing by han that takes him time to make out-- t may leave him in doubt— that be can't eusily read. And don’t fillout legal papers orcurd memos—or make out ac- counts or hotel rnenuoin your own hand writ- ing. f looks bad, refiects on your standing, makes people think you cau't afford a stenog- rapher, and is sometimes ambiguous. You can write out your letters—make out ax abstract—fill in an insurance policy—enter your card memos—make ont your accounts. or a hotel meuu—or de any kind of writtin: yoa need, on any kind, size or thickness 0} paper, and space any way you want on The__»_ ‘OLIVER ~ Typewriter The Standard Visible Writer __ You can write any of these things yourself ifvou do not happen to have a sieouners:. For you ean easily learn. with a little prac- tice. tu write just as ong: & and sepertectiy, ag an expert operator on the OLIVER. Be- cause the OLIVER is the simplified type- writer. And Ba can see every word you write. About 80 per cent. more durable | ‘than aby other typewriter, because it has about 80 per cent. less wearing points than most other typewriters. ‘0° per cent. easier to write with than these other complicated, intricate machines that require “humoriug”—technical knowledge— ley practice and special skill to operate; ‘han machines which cannot be adjusted to any special space—with which it is impossible to Write abstracts, insurance policies. or odd- sized documents except you buy expensive special attachments requiring experts to operate, You can adjust the OLIVER to any re: able space—you can write on any reas le size and thickness of paper, right out to the very edge, without the aid of any expensive attachment or special skitl, and your work will be neat appearing, legible and clear. For the OLIVER is the typewrite for the ee eee the insurance agent, the merchant. the hotel proprietor—or any man who does his own writing. Write us now for our booklet on simplified features of the OLIV ER. The OLIVER Typewriter Company 332 Hennepin Ave. the Minneapolis, Min The Tailor IS THE MAN You Should Consult ABOUT Clothes q Ce NN Charles Hammer The Second Street Tailor Is the Man to Make and Mend ‘Them. He guarantees the latest styles and perfect fit. Talk to him about clothes “and you wtil learn some- thing worth while. STATE OF MINNESOT County of 1 & { of Itasca. Office of County Auditor. ToJ. B. Chatterton: You are hereby notified, That the following described piece or parcel of land. situate in the county of Itasca and state of Minnesota, and known and described as follows. to-wit: lot seventeen (17). of block thirteen (13)Grand Rapids First division is now assessed in your nume; that.on the 7th day of May, A. D. 1901. at the sale of lands pursuant to the real estate tux judgment. duly given and made in and by the district court in end for said county of Itasca, the above described piece or parcel of land was duly offered for sale to the bidder who offered to pay the amount for which judgment was entered thereon and for which the same was to be sold, to-wit: the sum of three dollars and forty-one cents($3.41) at the lowest rate per cent. per annum inter- est on said amount, and no one bidding upon such offer an amount equal te that for which said piece or parcel of land was subject to be sold, the same was duly bid in for the state for the sum last aforesaid; that thereafter, to-wit, on the 12th day of November. A. D. 1906, said piece or parcel of jand still remain- ing unredeemed from said sale, the same was underthe direction and authority of the state auditor in pursuance Of the provisions of sections 936, 937 and 988, chapter 11 of the revised laws of 1905. duly sold at public sale to O. B. Seamans for the sum of twenty-seven dollars, aud fifty cents, ($27.50), he being the highest and best bidder therefor, and the said O. B, Seamans having received from the county auditor a certificate of sale for said piece or parcel of land. and the holder of Said certificate paying, pesenind the same to me for the purpose of having notice of the jiration of redemption from said sale given served, you are therefore hereby further notified that the amount uired to redeem eyes or parcel of land from said sale at the date of this notice, execlusiv the cost to acerue upon and for the service of this notice. is the sum of twenty-seven dollars and ty cents, ($27.50), with interest thereon accorditg to law, and that the time for re- demption of said piece or parcel of land from said sale will expire sixty, (60) days after the service of tbis novice and the proof of said service has been filed in my office. Witness my hand and offiical seal. thie 13th day of November. A D. 1906. [Official Seal} * Itasca Caunty, Minn. Heratd-Review Nov. 24, Dec. 1-8. Notice of Expiration of Redemption. STATE OF MINNESOTA, County of Itasca. ; Office of County Auditor. To Unknown: Contest Notice. At gor see. of the Interior, United States Duluth, Minnesota. November 16, 1906, A sufficient contest affidavit having been filed in this office bv E R. Lewis. contestant. against homestead entr;, No. made August &. 1904, at the Duluth. Minnesota, land office. for sw'4 se¥4, sec. 6, lot 1, ne4 nw’ and nw} -ne'4, sec. 7, all in township 61n, range 2? w, of the 4th p. m.. by John Fannon, contestee, in which it is alleged that said John Fannow has not resided upon said land for more than six months last past, and for more than one year last past; that he never established residence upon said land, and has not culti- vated or improved said land, and that sam is ae unimproved, wild, vacant and un occupied; that no one resided thoreon, and that no person has ever resided thereon and that there are no improvements whatever upon said land; and that said alleged absence from said land was not due to entryman’s empioyment in the army, navy or marine corps of the United States. in any capacity, during any war; said parties are hereby notified ere respond and offer evidence touching sa’ gation at 10 o'clock January 4, 1907 before I. a Clerk of District Court, at his office apids, Minnesota, and that final hearing will be held at 10 o’clock a. m. on January 11, 1907, before the Register and Receiver at the United States Land Office in Duluth, wet ger $ he sai contestant, ia proper affidavit, filed Novernber "16, 1906, set forth facte which show that after due diligence personal service of notice can not be made. itis hereby ordered that such notice be given by due and proper publication. . ©, HERMAN ENGEL, ister. Herald-Review Nov. 17, Dec. 22. ‘Summons. STATE OF MINNESOTA, | .. County OF Irasca. re Io District Court. Charles H. Howland, Plaintiff, vs Elizabeth Cox Howland, Defendant. The State of Minnesota to the defendant above named: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the complaint of the plaintiff in the action above entitled, which complaint has been filed and is now on file in the office of the clerk of the district court in and for the “| county of [tasca, state of Minnesota, in his office at the court hous: in the villaegof Grand Rapids, Minnesota, und to serve a copy of your answer to said complaint upon the sub- seriber at his office in the city of Crookston. Polk county, Minnesota, within thirty days after the service of this summons upon You are hereby notified, That the following described piece or parcel of land, situate in the county_of Itasca and State of Minne: and known and described as follows. to-wi all of block twenty-one (21), Grand Rupia: Second division. is now assessed in your name; that on the 2nd day of June A. D. 1900, ut the sale of lands pursuant to the real estate tax Judgment, duly given and mude in and by the district court in and for said county Of Itasca, the above described piece or parcel of land was duly offered for sule to the bidder who offered to pay the amount for which judgment was entered thereon and for which ‘the same was to be sold, (o-wit: the sum of ninety-six dollars, and seventy-two cents ($96.72) at the lowest rate per cent. per annum interest on said amount, and no one bidding agen such offer an amount equal to that for which (elapse or parcel of land was subject to be sold, the same was duly bid in for the state for the sum last afore- said; that thereafter, to-wit, on the 12th da: of November, A. D. 1906,said_ piece or parcel of land stiil remaining unredeersed from said sale, the same was, under the direction und authority of the state suditor pi yd of the provisions of sections %#, 937 and 9 chapter 11 of the revised laws of 1905, duly it public sale to O. B. Seamans for the m of one hundred thirteen dol- lars und eighty-nine cents, ($113.89), he being the highest and best bidder there- for, and the said O. B. Seamans having received from the county auditor a certifi- cate of sale for said piece or parcel of Jand, and the holder of said certificate having presented the same to me for the purpose of aving notice of the expiration of redemption from said sale given und served, you are therfore hereby further notified that the amount required to redeem said piece or parce! of land from said sale at the date of this notice, exclusive of the costs to accrue upon and for the service of this’ notice, is | the sum hundred thirteen dollars, and@eighty-nine cents, (#113.89) with interest thereon according to law, and that the time for the redemptivun fo said viece or parcel of land from said sale will expire sixty(60) days after the service of this notice and the proof ‘Of'Said Service tas been filed in my office Witness my hand and official seal, this 18th day of November. A. D. 1906, {Official Seal) M. A. SPANG. Auditor, Itasca County, Mion, Herald-Review Nov. 24, Dec. 1-8. —_——— —— Surnmons. STATE OF MINNESOTA, ! County of Itasca, f District Court, Vifteenth Judicial District, Jobn H. Hunter, Plaintiff. vs. Charles Zeigler. William O'Brien, and also ‘all persons unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest or lien the real estate described in the complaint herein, | Defendants. ‘The State of Minnesota to the Above Named fendants: You, and each of you. are hereby sum- moned and required to answer the complaint plaintiff in the above entitled action, complaint has been filed witb the clerk of district court in and for the county of Itasex. state of Minnesota. and to serve a copy of your answer to said complaint upon the subscribers ut their office, 33 Lumber Exchange building, he city of Minne- apolis. county of Hennepin. state of Minne: | sota, within twenty (20) after the Ser: i of this summons upon exclu: of the! day of such service: aud if you fail wo ans | wer said complaint within the time aforesaid. | the plaintiff in this action will apply to the | court for the relief demanded in said com- | plaint. together with his costs and disburse- ments herein. | Dated Nove mber 21, 1906. t A.Y. MERRILL | and R. j. POWELL, | Attorneys for Plaintiff, | 385 Lumber Exchange. | Minneapolis. Minn. | STATE OF MINNESOTA, } County of Itasca. ( District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District. Jobn H. Hunter, Plaintiff vs, Charles Ziegler, William O'Brien, and also ‘all persons unknown claiming any right tile, estate, interest of lien in the real! estave described ia the complaint herein Defendant: Notice is hereby given, That an action has’ been commenced in this court by the above named ntiff, against the above named defendants. the object of whieh js to obtain a judgment that said plaintiff is the owner in fee of the following described re: property. and that said defendants, and each | or them, have no estate or interest therein. or lien thereon. west, f the northwest quarter. the} southeast quarter of the northwest quarter and the northwest yuarter of the southwest quarter of section eight 15). township one hundred and fifty-one (151) north of range twenty-five (25) west of the 5th principal Meridian, situa e in the copnty of Itasca. State of Minnesot: Dated, November 21 ae and R Attorneys for Plaintiff, 335 Lumber Exchang Minneapolis, Minn. Herald-Review Dec. 1, Jan. Notice of Dissolution of Partnership. | Notice is hereby given that the copartner- ship heretofore existing and doing business in the village of Grand Rapids, Minn., under the firm name and style of L. F. Knox & C has this day been dissolved by mvtual con- sent. The members of said firm were L. F Knox, Joseph McHardy and W. G. ‘The business carried by said as sale and retail lumber dealing, which will be continued by sai F. Knox, who will coi- Ject all accounts owing to said firm and pay all debts contracted by said firm. Robert M, Stitt and Nel ‘The property invclved iu this action, is the i you, exclusive of the date of such service, and if you fail to answer the said complaint within the time aforesaid the plaintiff herein will apply to the court for the relief demand- ed in the complaint. A. A. MILLER, Attorney for Plaintiff. Crookston, Minn. Herald-Review Nov. 10, Dec. 15. Summor s. STATE OF a County of Itasca. District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District. Tbe Diamond Iron Mining Company, a Cor- poration, Plaintiff, vs. Mary A. Gordon and Thomas C, Gordon, her husband; W. ©. Goforth and Julia N Goforth, his wife. Defendants. The State of Minnesota, to the Above Named Defendants: You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to answer the complaint of the plaintiff in the above entitled action, which aint has been filed in the office of the Clerk of said District’ Court. at Grand Rapids. in the County of Itasca and state of Minnesota, and to serve a copy of your answer to said complaint on the subscriber at their office at room 600 New York li Biilding, in the city of Minneapolis, in the County of Hennepin and State of Minne- sota, within twenty days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service: and if you fail to" answer the suid complaint within the time aforesaid, the laintiff in this action will apply to the court ‘or the relief demanded in said complaint. Dated the 29th day of October, 1966. HICK: SARLETON & _biyintii’s Attorneys, 0 New York Life Building, Minnesota. Summons. STATE OF MINNESOTA. i County of Itasca. District Court Fifteenth Judicial District. Robert M. Stitt and Nellie Armstrong, € partners doing business as Stitt & Howe, Plaintiffs, vs. Allen Fitzgerald, Defendart. The State of Minnesota to the Above Named Defendant: You are hereby summoned and required to answer the complaint of the plaintiffs in the above entitled action, which complaint bas been filed in the office of the clerk of said district court. at the village of Grand Rapid in the county ef Itasca and state of Minn sota, and to serve a copy of vour auswer to said complaint on the subse rs at their office. in the city of Duluth in the county of St. Louis and state of Minnesota, within twenty days after service of this suzmons day of such upon you, exelusive of the serv! nd if you fail to answer the said complaint within the tim aforesaid, the plaintiffs in this action will apply to t court forthe relief demanded in said com- plaint. H. B. FRYBERGER and H. ULToD Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Offices 414-417 Lonsdale Bldg... Duluth, Minn Herakl-Review Nov. 5. Dec. $. Summons. STATE UF MINNESOTA. } > County of Itasea. J District Court Fifteenth Judicial District Armstrong. Ci us Stitt & Howe. art doing business Plain 5: vs. Ivkerman Helmer. Defendant. | The State of Minnesota to the Above Named Defendant: You are hereby summonec and required to answer the complaint of the ntiffs in the above entitled action. which complaint bas filed in the othce of the clerk of said court, at the village of Grand Rapid sca and state of Minn sota, and to serve a copy of your answer to said complaint on the subscribers at their in the city of Duluth in the county of $ puis and state of Minnesota. thin twenty days after service of this summone upon you, exclu of the day of eh i d if vou fail to answer the said nt_ within the time aforesaid. t laintiffs in this action will apply to the rt for the relief demanded in said com H. B. FRYBERGER and H.C, FULTON. "Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Offices 414-417 Lonsdale Bldg.. : Duluth, Minn. Herald-Review Nov. 3, Vee. 8. Notice of Application for License to Sell Intoxicating Liquors. Noticé is hereby given that Ellefson & Rofi- dal has petitioned the board of county com- missioners of Itasca county. Minnesota, for license to sell intoxicating liquors for a riod of one year from} the 2ist day of November, 1906, In the front room of a certain two story building on lot 12 block 2, First Addition to Gemmell, in the town of Evergreen. This application and any remonstrance 0” objections to the granting of the same will be heard and determined by said board of county commissioners, at their next ses on Friday, the 2ist day of December, 19 at the court house, in the village of Grand Rapids, Itasca county, Minnesota. Gonniy Anaitopltanes Grane pi unty w Itasca County, Mica. Dated November 27. 1900. . Herald-Review Dec. 1, 8, ted , Minn., Dec. 1. 1906. Dated Grand Rapids, M! BP Deen JOS. McHARDY W. MOORE Read the Herald-Review. DEFECTIVE PAGE