Grand Rapids Herald-Review Newspaper, November 3, 1906, Page 5

TOM SHEVLIN “AGAINST OIMSION LContinued from page one.) they could under the circumstances. They couldo’t accomplish impossibili- ties. That this defect in county affairs might be remendied does not change the fact that it has always existed. Mr. Shevlin evidently thinks that under present conditions it always will exist, and that with so large a territory under one county government his timber never will be discoy- ered. As a second reason for Mr. Shevlin’s deep interest in the “taxpayers” of Itasca county, it isa well-known fact that there exists a mutual battle for supremacy between Mr. Shevlin and the Backus-Brovks company of International Falls. The latter is fayorable to division, be- cause, probably, they consider it to their interests to have a new county created. Shevlin opposes anything that might result to the benefit of a company that he is antagonistic to. This latter statement may put Tom Shevlin before the public in a light that does not reflect creditably upon a full-grown man, but it is the fact, nevertheless, and a fact well known to those who are at all acquainted with the affairs of either the Backus- Brooks or Shevlin company. The ‘Anti-County Division Advo- cate’? was sprung on the publicin the silent night time, that none might see from whence it sprung. No re- spectable pareut will claim it as a child. The hireling who conceived and brought it forth wa8 ashamed or afraid to stand spousor for its advent into the would. The voters of Itasca county should remember that it is Tom Shevlin’s money that is paying for opposition to county division; they should re- member that the man who prepared and is causing to be circulated the alleged arguments against county division is in the employ of Tom Shevlin; they should remember that the Shevlin hireling has never paid one dollar in taxes in Itasca county and does not own a dollar’s worth of property in the county. Remember- ing these things they should stop to consider well the importance of county division, and the unimportance and irresponsibility of the individual who is hired by Shevlin to till the people of this county what is best for their interests. Consider the significance of this, Mr. Voter: If it were true, as alleged by Mr. Sheylin’s hired agent, that the county’s ledger book will sh owthat the maintainance of the county at its present size would be to the : busi- ness benefit of the taxpers of the south half of the county, why is it that the business men of this section have not taken the matter in hand and opposed the proposed division? If it will result to the business de- triment of this section why did the Grand Rapids Commercial club un- animously endorse the proposition? If it will result in increased taxes and deceased revenues, why is it en- dorsed by a vast majority of the heav- iest taxpayers south of the proposed division line? Are all these business men combin- ed in conspiracy against their own in- terests, and seek only to adyance the interests of the Backus-Bruoks com- pany in the establishment of a county seat at [aternatiunal Falls? Or, is it possible that they acted in ignorance anti] Tom Shevlin’s purse lent ap inspiration to the ten-dollar-a-week literary genius to unfold the truth? The literary and statistical repre- sentative of the Shevlin pine land in- terests was unable to find and present a single argumeut against the pro- posed division that he could prove with figures taken from county re- cords. Why did be oot refute the fignres heretofore presented by the Herald-Review? This paper has presistently advocated division for years. In presenting argument to maintain the position taken on this important public question the Her- aid Review has relied wholly upon the facts as they exist. The figures that have’ been presented from time time were taken verbatim from the records in the county auditor's office. To show to what extreme measures the Shevlin advocate was driven for material on which to base argument it is only necessary to call attention to the tigures presented in the ‘“‘Anti- County Divisiun Advocate.” Therein figures are given showing court ex- penses fur the year 15. Without dis- cassing the accuracy or inaccuracy of the figures quoted the Herald-Re- yiew would like to be informed what in thunder court expenses have to do with the proposition? The courts have no fixed amount for yearly ex- penditure. One year the expenses might not exceed $5,000, while an- other year the taxpayers might, be called upon to foot bills aggregating $25,000. As an illustration we might call at to. th u aes of murder. The total cost in that vase alone was nearly $16,000. Take the Gatdner case as another example, What becomes of the $13,000 that the north end is now alleged to contri- bute. It wouldn’tpay the expenses of one northend killing. ‘i Following the Herald-Review pre- sents some figures that every taxpay- er in this section of the county should read carefully. They are taken from the auditor’s records and cao be veri- tied. There is one proposition that should be bore in mind, and that is that the county’s tax year is not the calander year. For instance the taxes that are being paid this year are taxes levied upon the 1905 assessment. Hence in computing expenditures for any year you have of necessity to take the of the proceeding years as a basis of calculation. The money paid out by the county upon the revenue fund for 1903 up to September 30, 1906 is as follows: -$ 33,598.72 44,061.47 1905. 5 56,515.50 1906 to Sept. 30. 50,756.87 ~ Total $184,832.56 This money was paid in for the tax- ation years of 1902, 1903, 1904 and 1905, To determine the exact propotion of this money that the territory in the proposed county of Koochiching would contribute the following figures from the auditor’s office are given: Valuation ‘‘Koochiching Amt county Co. valuation” levied 1902 $6,623,578 $1,197,646 $5,988.23 1903 7,272,557 1,668,591 8,057.24 1904 9,244,927 2,801,935 10,647.53 1905 11,019,192 2,984,485 13,549.52 $34,160,254 $8,662,657 $38,243.52 From the figures one finds that the new county of Koochiching had an aggregate assessment of $8,661,657 of the total assessment of the county for four years, $34,160,254. The new county had therefore contributed 25.3 per cent of thesentire valuation. We find that the county expended $184,832.06, in three years and up to September 30, 1906, of which amount, bad every dollar of taxes levied against the territory in the proposed new county been paid into the county treasury, a payment of $38,243.52 would have been paid into the county revenue fund or 20.6 per cent of the expenditures for the past four years. It will thus be seen that the terri- tory in the new county bas not con- tributed its proportunate share of the expenses, dropping behind about 4.7 per cent. This per cent will be augmented ere the fiscal year has ended, and it is a safe estimate to say that it will be delinquent over 5 per cent. Every argument that can be, and is, presented in favor of prepetuating Itasca county at its present -enorm- ous size, could have been, and was, presented, argued and urged years ago to continue the relations of Itasca and Aitkin counties when Itasca was a partof Aitkin. Going still further, if the argoments now advanced against division are good and sufiici- ent to continue as we are, then it was a serious mistake to dissolve the re lations that once existed between Aitkin, Itasca, Cass and Beltrami counties when they were attached to Crow Wing. The Taxation Amendment. There iseverv prospect that the wide-open tax amendment, to be voted on Noy. 6, in Minnesota,. will die of inanition unless active measures are taken at once to inform tbe people and to arouse their ibterest in the proposition. It must not be forgotten that.eevery failure to vote on the question is a vote against ‘the amendment, which must haye a clear majority of all votes cast at tbe electiun before it becomes a part of the organic law of tne state. There is no doubt about the adoption of the ameudment if the mass of the voters understand its purpose, which, in simplest terms, is to remove the obstacles that are now found in the constitution. If it passes, the legis- lature will: have a chance to enact just tax laws and to reform the present absurd system of personal property taxation. The fact is that it bas taken nearly six years of agitation to get this amendment before the people, in the face of steady and determined opposition from corpurate interests that fear tax reform. If the amendment fails to carry this time, apy effective measures of reform will be impossible next winter, and the improvement of our tax laws will be indefinitely post- poned. The burden will continue to fall on the owners of real estate aud on those who are unable or unwilling to conceal their personal property from the assessor. The tax weight will still fall heaviest vn the poor or those of moderate means. If the people want a change, let them vote for the amendment; and, it should be borne 1n mind, the man who fails: to vote, thereby casts a yote against it, as, tocarry, it taust receive a ima- Jority of 3 : ‘Miuneapolis Journal. Brey ane of all the votes cast at the elec-| kindly ee on Tu FAREWELL OF 1 pass away; my race is run; my duty has been performed; I call to- day to say gvodbye forever, dear reader. I shall never again bring you glad or sad tidings of the events Qf the week. My stories will be left for others to tell. have been a small factor in the affairs of Grand Rapids, Itasca county and northern Minnesota 1 have labored assiduously for the welfare of my patrons, my neighbors and all with whom I have associated. I have | thistown and county and I have heralded their greatness wherever I chanced to travel. Ihave noted the good fortunes of our citizensand have enjoyed their enjoyments; I have wept when they wept; have sym- pathized with them in their sorrow; have offered’ in soothing terms condolence and cheer and encour- agement when they were sorely grieved. I have been optimistic at all times and the splendid life of business and social activity that I pow leave is proof positive that my opimism was amply justified. 1 go out Of a world today <mat is pulsat- ing with a spirit of raNuurous delight. As my eyes grow dim ant~my senses numb from the shadows of the pallad hand of approaching death, 1 see prosperity and plenty everywhere; I see bappy, healthy and ambitious men, women snd children about me all satisfied with the present and ! peering into a still more glorious fu- | tare. It is indeed with sorrow that I say the parting word—the last fare- well. Just as' we are about to reach the summit of material and social greatness—the goal that we have all struggled hand in band to reach— I am forced by cruel fate to leave the glory and the goal for others to at- tain and enjoy, I find consolation, however, in knowing that the duties I have been performing for mcre than sixteen years, will be left with others equally competent—the Herald-Re- view and Independent. They will abiy and amply fill the tteld and be the more prosperous with one less competitor. I bid them hail and farewell. { would say a parting word vefore departing on the local political situa- tion. As I have lived, so dol die—a Republican. In local affairs, how- ever, 1 have always stood for the best, man, irrespective of politics. First, I am for northern Minnesota sud therefore Iam for Cole. My last advise to the people heréabouts is to vote for A. L. Cole, the Republican nominee for governor. I have per- sonally known him for many years. He is a good man and a brainy one. He knows northern Minaesota as_he knows his househuld and loves this section as he loves his family. He will make one of the best governors the state has eyer had and under his wise leadership this rich north coun- try will grow and prosper as it never has before. As a last appeal to the veople of my beloved county 1 ask you all to vote for the ré-election of our good sheriff, Wm. Hoolihan. He bas made an ideal officer; he is prompt to act; fearless and impartial in the dis- charge of his duties; brave as a lion, yet as kindly’ hearted as the gentle lamb; he is an officer of excellent judgment and in his hands theaffairs of the county are absolutely safe. Do not take any chances by experiment: ing. Sheriff Hooilnan bas made good. Let goud enough alone. And there’s A. L. Thwing, Repub- lican candidate for county attorney. I wish to speak a word in his behalf. I haye known him for about five years aud have watched his progress in the pratice of his profession. He is a good lawyer; he is conscientious in the discharge of his duties. He should be elected, and if he is not the people of this county will regret their action in the matter as one of the greatest errors ever committed by any body of voters. I knuw whereof jl speak. If the people of this county waut a lawyer to act as county at+ torney they must elect a lawyer, and if they elect A. L. Thwing they will have a lawyer and a good one. Judge of Probate Huson is another excellent county servant whom the voters should endorse without re- serve. Look at the records of his office; note the close and careful at- tention he gives to ever matter that passes through his official hands; ree member that he is to be found in his Office at all hours on every business day of the year; remember that he is an old and respected citizen, and above all remember the importance of the office and then vote to reta.n Judge Huson. The other local candidates appear to be the unacimous choice of all our people, Auditor Spang, Treas- urer Kremer, Register of Deeds Mc- Gowan, Superintendent of Schools Mrs. Booth and Surveyor Brown are all deservedly popular with the people whom they have served. God bless them all. : # With these few farewell words and monitions as to yuur action In the years that I} watched with pride the growth of} | REASONS FOR THE MAGNET COUNTY DIVISION It will build better roads. It will improve local government. It will create more organized towns. It will facilitate and decrease the cost of official business. _It will create smaller commissioner districts with consequent better public service, It will decrease taxation in the old county and will not increase it in the new county, It will reheve the taxpayers from the burden of paying enormous mileage to officers, jurors and witnesses for the Rainy River region. it will relieve the old county from | burdensome expense; it will enable the new county to attend to county affairs without expensive and tedious travel and loss of time. Vote tor it! 1 It has the favor of every thoughtful man who has given it consideration, If you live south of the dividing line vote to promote your ; Own business interests and tu grant the 6,000 people of the new county the reasonable pnivilege they ask. If you live north of the new hne vote to save yourself time and money and enhance the value of your property. The present county of Itasca is such an empire in size that it is inconven- lent and burdensome to continue it as one county organization. It contains 1-14 the area of the state and 1s as large as twelve Minnesota counties of the average size. Itis 111 miles long and 62 miles wide. The proposed division will create two counues of nearly equal area. It will leave the old county with a present assessed valuation of nearly $10,000,000 and the new county will Start nearly $4,000,000. The average as- sessed valuation of 80 counties of the state—all except Hennepin, Ramsey and St. Louis—is less than $6,000,000. 23 counties have a total valuation of less than $4,000,v00 each. Only the temporary location of a county seat for the new county is in- volved. After division a special elec- tion can be held to designate the county seat. by Seah TS USC TT Ee ’ Mrs, Bither will take pupils in voice Plany, organ or harmony. Conserva- tory graduate, two years post-gradu- ate work in Chicago under instructors of nationai reputation, Five years experience as supervisor in public schools and teacher of piano and grean. Highest references. ‘Terms, orty minutes, fifty cents.. Residence, Hoffman Ave., north. Summons. STATE OF ao Tk County of Itasca. District Court. Fifteenth Judicial District Robert M, Stitt and Nellie Armstrong, Co- partners, doing business us Stitt & Howe, Plaintiffs, —_ vs. Inkerman Helmer. Defendant. The State of Minnesota to the Above Named Defendant: You are hereby summone¢ and required to answer the compleint of the plaintitts in the ubove entitled action. which complaint has been filed in the office of the clerk of said district court, at the village of Grand Rapids in the county of Itasca and state of Minne- sota, and to serve a copy of your answer to said’ complaint on the subscribers at their office, in the city of Duluth in the county of St. Louis. and state of Minnesota, within twenty days after service of this summons upon you, eXclusive of the day of such service; and if you fail to answer the said complaint within the time aforesaid. the plaintiffs in this action will apply to the epnet for the relief demanded in said com- plaint. & H. B. FRYBERGER and H.C, FULTON, Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Offices 414-417 Lonsdale Bldg.. Duluth, Minn. Herald-Review Nov. 3. Dec. 8. Summons. STATE OF MINNESOTA. i County of Itasca. District Court Fifteenth Judicial District. Robert M. Stitt and Nellie eigen. Co” artners doing business as Stitt & Hower laintiffs, vs. Allen Fitzgerald, Defendart. The State of Minnesota to the Above Named Defendant: You are hereby eummoned and required to answer the complaint of the plaintiffs in the above entitled action, which complaint has been filed in the office of the clerk of ssid district court, at the village of Grand Rapids. in the county cf Itasca and state of Minne- sota, and to serve a copy of your answer to said complaint on the subscribers at their office. in the city of Duluth in the county of St. Louis and state of Minnesota, within twenty days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of such service: and if you fail to answer the said complaint within the time aforesaid, the plaintiffs in this action will apply to the court for the relief demanded in said com- plaint. H. B. FRYBERGER and H.C. FULTON. Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Offices 414-417 Pre itree 0. Herald-Review Nov. 3, Dec. Notice of Hearing. ‘Notice is hereby given that whereas on August 31, 1906, a certuin license was grant the-board of county commissioners in and for the county of Itasca and state of Minne- sota to one Frank Larson to sell intoxicating liquors for a perioa of one (1) year from Jul; 1,'1906, in the front room of a frame hotel building situated on lot 1 of block 13, original town of Bigfork, in said county, and whereas, said Frank Larson has sold and dis; of the business being carried on under said license. to one James H. Finley, and whereas suid James H, Finley has since made appli- cation to said board of county commissioners that said license be transferred to bim, said Finley, and that in said license, when so transferred. the place where said liquors may be sold be correctly described, to-wit, as the fo. sale of said aving been incorrect described ¢ original application of sai Larson and the license to him granted; now, ny remonstrances or objections to with an assessed valuation of | | | ‘ IT IS SAID that there never was a good article put on the market that was not imitated. We all know that imitations are never so good as the genuine and in stoves it was never more emphatically demonstrated than in the case of the genuine ROUND OAK heating stove. There are four or five hundred imita- tions of this fam- ous stove and not one of them ever “worked’’ like the ROUND OAK and not one ever made areputation. Does it not stand to rea- son that the stove that has stood the ~ test for 35 years, with still the larg- est.sale and great- est reputation has some great merits that place it above and beyond its imi- tators? Sure, and we wish you to know that the ROUND OAK is the best all-round heat- stove for any kind of fuel made. Have you seen it rigged up for hard coal? } We have it and _in- vite Un inspection. The name “ROUND OAK”? is on leg and door. W.J. & H. “This, Fritz, rp is the Statue of Liberty. presented to America by France.” D. Powers Grand Rapids, Minn. Order to Show Cause of Filing Petition to Sell Land. STATE OF MINNESOTA, | ., COUNTY OF ITASCA. \_ {°° In Probate Court. Before H. S. Huson, Esq., Judge of Probate. Special Term, November Ist, 1906. i In the matter of the estate of August Cham- ier, deceased. On reading and filing the petition of Edwin Kersten, administrator of said estate, setting forth the amount of personal estate that has come into his hanas, the disposition thereof, and how much remains undisposed of; and the description of all of the real estate, situ- ate in Itasca county, Minnesota and Henne- din county, Minnesota. of which said deceased died seized. und the condition and value of the respective portions or lots thereof; the per- sons interested in said estate with their resi- dences, and praying that license be to him granted to sell all of said _real estate situate in Itasca county, Minnesow, and Hennepin county, Minnesota, and setting forth grounds for such saie of real estate. And it appearing by said petition that all of suid persons interested in said estate re- side.in Germany and not in the United States all and that of Said real estate is unimproved, vacant and unoccupied and wholly unpro- ductive, Thet it is a source of expense to all the persons interested therein and that no income can be derived therefrom except by the sale thereof and that because of the expense of ,looking after the same and the taxes ‘accruing thercoa, ani othr expenses, and other reasons set forth in said petition, it is neccessary and to the best interests of all said persons interest- ed in said estace that said lands and premises be sold and the proceeds thereof distributed tojhe persons interested therein 2 tofaw: said real eStute being de: fullows, to-wit: : An undivided two-thirds (76) interest in all of the following described lots. pieces and parcels of land, situated in the County of Itasca, Stave Of Minnesota, described us fol- lows, to-wit: Lots 19 to 24, both inclusive. in block 3; lots 7 to 12, both inclusive, in block 6; Jot 14 in block 10; lots 8 to 8, both inclusive, in block 12: lots 19 to 24, both inclusivi n block 13; lots 1 to 6, both inclusive, block to 10, both inclusive, in block 20; lots 18 to 18, both inclusive. in block 29; lots 7 to 11, both | inclusive, in Llock 31; lots 24 to 30. both inclu- sive in block 37; lots 1 to 12, both inclusive, in block 39; lots 19 to 21, both inclusive, and lots % to 30, both inclusive, in block 40, lot 18 in block 42, all in Syndicate Division in the Vil- lage of Grand Kapips, ltasca county, Minne- sota, acecording to the plat thercof of record and On file in the office of the Register of Deeds for Itasca county, Minn. Also an un— divided one-half {2) of lot 18 in block 4 of Sidle Park in the city of Minneapolis, State of Minnesota. Itis further ordered, That all persons in- terested in said estate appear before- this court on Thursday, the 20th day of Novem- ber, A. D. 1906, at ten (10) o'clock a. m. at the Soupg House in the Village o; Grand Rapids. in si county. then and there to show cause, ifany there be, why license should not be granted to said Edwin Kersten, administra- tor of said estate, to sell all of the said real estate at private sale. ‘And it is further ordered. That this order shall be published Once in each week for three successive weeks prior to said day of hearing in the Grand Rapids Herald-Keview, a weekly newspaper printed and published at Grand Rapids, in said ban ig 5 Dated at Grand Rapids, Minnesota, the first day of November, A. D. 1906. By the court, . S$. HUSON, § Probaté Court | Judge of Probate. ( seal ‘ (Herald-Review Nov. 3, 10, 17. 24.) Notice of Application for License to Sell Intoxicating Liquors. Notice is nereby ives that Wm. A. Hadler has petitioned the board of county commis- sioners of Itasca county, Minnesota, for license to sell intoxicating liquors for a period of one year from the first day cf October, 1906. In the front room on the ground floor of that certuin sbuilding situate pyen lot 10, block 7, piat of Snowball, town of ) ashwauk, Minn. This application and any remonstrance or objections to the granting of the same will be heard and determined by said board of county comuissioners. at their next session. on Tuesday the 20th day of November, 1 at ore Soe house. in pi village of Gran Rapids, Itasca county, Minne 5 % M.A. SPANG, Couuty Auditor Itasca County, Minn. Dated November 3rd. 1906. Herald-Review Nov. 3, 10. Notice of Application for License to Sell Intoxicating Liquors. Notice is hereby given that Lander Larson and John O. Larson, copartners as Larson & Co., have petitioned the board of county commissioners of ee Er cong hl Minnesota, for license to seli into: few iquors for a Pes oF one year from the first day of De- Tr, 4 tn the front room on the ground floor of the one story frame building situated upon lot 3, block 7. plat of Bigfork, town of Bigfork, Ttasca county, Minn. This application and any remonstrance or objections to the erapting of the same will be heard and determined by said board of Sonne comma = RE Nenieer 1906, of .o village uf tioned mesoti. Notwe of Applicat'on for License to Seil Intoxicating Liquors. | Notice is herebn given that John M. Jones has petitioned the board of county commis- sioners of Itasca county, Minnesota, for license to sell intoxicating liquors for a pees of one year from the h day of jovember. 1906. : In the front room on the ground ficor of the one story frame building situated upon lot i one block 7. plat of Bigfork, Itasca county, n on. This application and any remonstrance or objections to the granting of the same will be heard and determined by said board of ‘county commissioners, at their next session, on Tuesday, the 20th day of November, 1906. s the court house. in the village of Grand Rapids, Itasca county, Minnesota. County Auditor Itasca County, Mini « auditor sca junty, * Dated Nov. 2nd, 1906, ene Herald-Review Noy. 3, 10. Notice of Application for License to Sell Intoxicating Liquors, Notice is hereby given that William H. Daley has petitioned the board of county commissioners of Itascz county. Minnesota, for license to sell intoxicating liquors for a riod of one year from the 20th day of November, 1906, In the front room on the ground floor of the one story frame building situated upon lot Beles 7, plat of Bigfork, Itasca county, Minn. This application and any remonstrance ot objections to the ‘granting of the same will heard and determined by said board of county commissioners, at their next session, on Tuesday, the 20th day of November. 1906. at the court house, in the village of Grand Rapids, Itasca county, Minnesota. {. County Auditor Itaseu County, Mid Sounty Auditor Itasca County, Mian. Dated Nov. 2nd_ 1906. ‘s % Herald-Review Nev. 3, 10. Notice for Publication. United States Land Office, ee Minn. Notice is hereby given that in with the provisions of the act of congress of June 3, 1878. entitled “An act for the sale of timber Jands in the States of California, O gon, Nevada and Washington Territ extended to all the Public Land States by act of August 4, 1892, HERMAN GRAN, of Grand Rapids, county of Itas § Minnesota, has this day filed in thi: sworn statement No. for the purchase on No. 9 in township No. 55 n, range No. 23 w, and will offer proof how that the jand sought is mo valuable for its timber or stone than for agri- cultural purposes, and to establish his claim to said land before Clerk of District Court at his office in Grand Rapids. Minn., on Thurs- day. the 6th day of December. i906. He names as Witnesses: Frank B. Gran of Grand Rapids. Minn., Charles Point of Rapids, |inn.. < Ti Rapids. Minn., Victor Gran of Duluth, Mir Any and all persons claiming adversely t above-described lands are requested to fil their claims in this office on or before said 6th day of December, 1906. J.C, HERMAN ENGEL, i Register. Herald-Review July 28, Nov 24 ' Contest Notice. Department of the Interior, United States Land Office, Duluth, Minnesota. September 22, 1906. A sufficient contest affidavit. having been filed in this office by E R. Le contestant. against homestead entr;, No, 20656, made August 8. 1904, at Duluth, Minnesota, land office. for sw'4 se’, sec. 6, lot 1, ne4 nw’ and nw}4 ne’4, sec. 7, all in township 61, range 22 w of 4th p. m., by John Fannon, contestee, in which it is alleged that said John Fannow has not resided upon said land for more than six months last past, and for more than one _year last past; that he never established residence upon said land, and has not culti- vated or improved said land, and that same is very unimproved, wild, vacant and un- occupied; that no one resides thoreon, and that there are no improvements whatever upon said land;.and that said alleged absence eneeworgt aaa not due to entryman’s nthe army, navy or marine corps of the United States. in any capacity. during any war; satd parties are hereby notified bape r. respond and offer evidence touching said allegation at 10 o'clock a. m. on November 9, 1906 before I. D. Rassmussen, Clerk of District Court, at his office in Grand aap Minnesota, and that final hearing will be held at 10 o’clock a. m. on _N. 16, 1906, before the SRegister and Receiver at United States Land Office in Duluth, nesota. ‘The said contestant having, ia a proper affidavit, fled September 191908, set forth facte which show that after due diligence personal service of this notice can not be made. it is berey. ordered and directed that poco eres be given by due and proper publi- J. ©. Herman ENGEL, gister. Herald-Review Sept, 29, Oct. 6-27, Nov. 3. _ House and lot for sale. This is a eal b wire at First State | |