Evening Star Newspaper, October 22, 1936, Page 10

Page views left: 0

You have reached the hourly page view limit. Unlock higher limit to our entire archive!

Subscribers enjoy higher page view limit, downloads, and exclusive features.

Text content (automatically generated)

NG STAR, WASHINGTON, Text of Roosevelt Speech in Worcester Proclaims Principle of Democracy -in Taxation, Claiming Cuts for' Individuals and Small By the Associated Press. WORCESTER, MASS., October 22.|. =The text of President Roosevell’s wpeech here last night follows: I am glad to be in New England— New England, from which have come most of my forebears. In recent weeks I have traveled through a great part of the United States. I have spoken about farming, mining and livestock, about business big and little, about the wage earner, about the na- tional debt, about drought and flood, about work for the needy unemployed and security—security for our people and for their homes. I have found a Nation more greatly prosperous, more definitely on the highway to complete regov- ery than at any time in the past seven years. I have seen- the record of what we have done in the faces of the people I have met, ‘We have banished old man gloom. It has taken only one day in driving through Rhode Island and Massachusetts to prove to me that New England is in step and on march with the rest of the Nation. I have seen things today even more welcome to me than your lovely Autumn foliage. I have seen the smoke from factories—which three and a half years ago were smokeless. I have heard the sound of mills—which three and a half years ago were silent. I have seen men at work who three and a half years ago were jobless. I have seen women and children who—after long years of fear—have begun to live and hope again. ‘Three and a half years ago we declared war on the depression. You and I know today that that war is being won. : But now comes that familiar figure—the well-upholstered hind- sight critic. He tells us that our strategy was wrong—that the cost was too great—that something else won the war, That is an argument as old as the remorse of those who had their chance and muffed it. It is as recent as the claims of those who say that they could have done it vetter. Not Held Too High For Victory. You may remember the first battle of the Marne. Almost everybody thought that Marshal Joffre had won it. But some re- fused to agree. One day a news- paper man appealed to Marshal Joffre: “Will you tell me who did win the Battle of the Marne?” “I can't answer that,” sald the marshal. “But I can tell you that if the Battle of the Marne had been lost the blame would have been on me.” Our war, too, had to be won. No price, we were told then, was t00 high to pay to win it. We did count the cost. But in the bar- rage we laid down against the de- pression we could not stop firing to haggle about the price of every shell. We kept on fighting. The important thing is that the war is being won. ‘Without that victory we cannot have the kind of an America we know and love and want our chil- dren to live in. New England—as one of ‘the’ senior partners in the company of the States—has always stood for two of the fundamentals of Amer- ican liberty—the town meeting, with its essential insistence on local control over local affairs—and the doctrine for which Sam Adams and his friends were willing to fight— the doctrine of Democracy in tax- ation. While I do not happen to be s cousin of the distinguished Adams family, I consider myself, politically, a lineal descendent of old Sam. In 1776 the fight was for Democ- racy in taxation. In 1936 that is still the fight. Mr. Justice Oliver ‘Wendell Holmes once said: “Taxes are the price we pay for -eivilized society.” One sure way to deter- mine the social conscience of a government is to examine the way taxes are collected and how they are spent. And one sure WAy to determine the social conscience of an individual is to get his tax- reaction. Taxes, after all, are the dues we pay for the privileges of members ship in an organized society. As society becomes more civi- fized, government—National, State and local government—is called on to assume more obligations to its citizens. The privileges of mem- bership in a civilized society have vastly increased in modern times. But I am afraid we have many who still do not recognize their ad- vantages and want to avoid paying their dues. Most Developments In Last 2 Generations. It is only in the last two genera- tions that most local communi- ties have paved and lighted their streets, put in town sewers, pro- vided town water supplies, or- ganized fire departments, estab- lished high schools and public libraries, created parks and play- grounds—undertaken, in short, all kinds of necessary new activities which, perforce, had to be paid for out of local taxes. And let me at this point note that in this most amazing of cam- paigns, I found sections of the Nation where Republican leaders were actually whispering the word to the owners of homes and farms that the present Federal adminis- tration proposed to make a cash levy on local real estate to pay off the national debt. They know that the Federal Government does not tax real estate—that it cannot tax real estate. If they do not know that, I suggest they read the Constitu- tion of the United States to find out. New obligations to their citizens have also been assumed by the several States and by the Federal Government to their citizens— obligations unknown a century and & half ago, but made necessary by new inventions and by & constantly growing social conscience. ‘The easiest way to summarize the reason for this extension of government functions, local, State and National, is to use the words of Abraham Lincoln: “The legiti- mate object of Government is to do for the people what needs to be done, but which they cannot by individual effort do at all, or do so well for themselves. Taxes are the price we all pay collectively to get those things done. To divide fairly among the peo- ple the obligation to pay for these benefits has been a major part of our struggle to maintain democracy in America. Ever since 1776 that struggle has been betWeen two forces. On the one hand there has been the vast majority of our citizens ‘who believed that the benefits of democracy should be extended and who were willing to pay their fair share to extend them. On the other hand, there has been & small but powerful group which has fought the extension of those ELASTIC-KNIT SHORTS AND SHIRTS FOR COLD WEATHER! bnndlin'-u, in early obably don't need beca, oo e0d Hanes o Corporations. benefits, because it did not want to pay a fair share of their cost. That was the line-up in 1776. ‘That is the line-up in this cam- paign. And I am confident that once more—in 1936—democracy in taxation will win. Urges Taxes According Te Ability to Pay. Here is my principle: Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. Before this great war against the depression we fought the ‘World War, and it cost us $25,000,- 000,000 in three years to win it. We borrowed to fight that war. Then, as now, & Democratic ad- ministration provided sufficient taxes to pay off the entire war debt within 10 or 15 years. ‘Those taxes had been levied ac- cording to ability to pay. But the succeeding Republican adminis- tration did not believe in that principle. There They had political debts to those who sat at their elbows. To pay those political debts, they reduced the taxes of their friends in the higher brackets and left the na- tional debt to be paid by later generations. Because they evaded their obligations, because they re- garded the political debt as more important than the national debt. The depression in 1929 started with a $16,000,000,000-handicap on us and our children. Now, let's keep this little drama straight. The actors are the same, But the act is different. Today their role calls for stage tears about the next generation. But in the days after the World War they played a different part. ‘The moral of the play is clear. ‘They got out from under then— they would get out from under now —if their friends could get back into power and they dould get back to the driver's seat. But neither you nor I think that they are going to get back. But, as in the World War, we have again created a tax structure to yield revenues adequate to pay the cost of this war against depres- sion in this generation and not in the next. New or increased taxes are not needed to enable us to balance the Federal budget and to begin very soon & rapid reduction of the Na- debt. Recovery is with was & reason. ' Federal revenues are increasing: emergency expenditures are de- creasing. A balanced budget is on the way. Does that sound like bankruptcy to you? Why this increase in Govern- ment revenues? Because the tax- payer earns more money and spends more *money. Though he pays more money in taxes, he has more money left for himself and for his family. Individual Income Tax Reduced. For the average American we have reduced the individual income tax. Any family head who earns an income of less than $26,000 a year paid a smaller income tax in 1936 than he paid for 1932. That means that less than 1 per cent of the heads of American families pay more than they did; and more than 99 per cent pay less than they did, for more than 99 per cent earn less than $26,000 per year. If you want the answer to this talk about high taxes under this administration— there it is. Taxes ure higher for those who can afford to pay high taxes. They are lower for those who can afford to pay less. That is getting back again to the Amer- ican principle—taxation according to ability to pay. You would think, to hear some people talk, that those good people .| who live at the top of our eco- nomic pyramid are being taxed into rags and tatters. What is the fact? The fact is that they are much farther away from the poor- house than they were in 1932. You and I know that as a mat- ter of personal observation. A number of my friends who be- long in these upper brackets have suggested to me, more in sorrow than in anger, that if I am re- elected they will have to move to some other nation because of high taxes here. I will miss them very much, but if they go they will soon come back. For a year or two of paying taxes in almost any other country in the world will make them yearn once more for the good old taxes in the United States. One more word on recent history. 1 inherited from the previous ad- ministration a tax structure which not only imposed an unfair tax burden on the low-income groups of this country—but which im- posed an unfair burden upon the average American by a long list of taxes on purchases and con- sumption—hidden taxes. In 1933, when we came into office, 58 cents out of every dollar of Federal revenue came from hid- den taxes. Leaving out of ac- count the liquor tax—for liquor was illegal in 1933—we have re- D. .C, duced these indirect taxes to 38 cents out of every dollar, How else have we improved and Americanized the tax structure? First, we gave a credit to earned income—that is income from per- sonal work or service—thus sub- stantially reducing taxes paid by the working citizen. Wasn't that the American thing to do? Small Corporation Tax Rate Slashed, Second, we decressed the tax rates on small corporations. Wasn't that the American thing to do? . Third, we ' increased the taxes paid by individuals in the higher brackets—those of incomes over $50,000 a year. Wasn't that the American thing to do? Fourth, we increased still fur- ther the taxes paid by inidividuals in the highest brackets—those with incomes over $1,000,000 a year. Wasn't that the American thing to do? Fifth, we increased the tax on very large estates. Wasn't that the American thing to do? Finally, this year we had to find new revenues to meet the immediate bonus payments and to take the place of the processing taxes, This new tax—called the undistributed profits tax—is merely an extension of the individual in- come tax law and a plugging-up of the loopholes in it. Loopholes which could be used only by men of very large incomes, I want to say a word to you average investors and stockholders who are being flooded*by propa- ganda about this tax—propaganda, incidentally, paid for by your money. It is being disseminated by those who have used corpo- rations in the past to build up their own economic power, who seek, by holding back your divi- dends, to keep down their taxes. It is & fact that 98'; per cent of all American corporations will pay a ‘smaller normal corporation tax under the new law. It is a fact that the law permits corporations to expand and build up adequate reserves. But for the first time it gives the stockholder a practical chance to determine for himself whether or not to keep his earnings in the corporation for expansion pur- poses, He is now the one to choose between using his dividends for something else and reinvesting them in stock of the corporation. What we are concerned with pri- marily is principle—and the prin- ciple of the law is sound. If in its application, imperfec- tions are discovered, they must be corrected for the good of American business. I am certain that the average of our citizenship is not taken in by _THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22, 1936. the amazing amount of other tax misinformation—which has been turned loose in this " political campaign, Majority of Taxes Not National. People tell you there are 58 taxes on & loaf of bread, or 63 taxes on & lady’s coat. But stop, look and listen, You will find what the propagandists do not tell you—that only two or three of all of them are Federal taxes imposed by the National Government. All the rest are imposed by local, town, county, city, district and State govern- ments. Two-thirds of all the taxes paid in America are State and local taxes—not Federal taxes. This Administration has had something to do with these local taxes. It has made them easier to bear. At the request of local and State governments, for whom the local burden had become too heavy, we assumed the cost of paying in greater part for work for the needy. unemployed. And, by a National fiscal policy aimed at reducing in- terest rates we have greatly light- ened the burden of carrying local government debts—helping those of you who own homes and farms or who pay rent, I want to say a word also to the ‘wage-earners who are finding prop- aganda about the security tax in their pay envelopes. I want to re- mind them that the security law was designed for them—for the greater safety of their homes and families. The fund necessary to provide that security is not col- lected solely from workers. The employer, 100, pays an equal share, And both shares—yours and the employers—are being held for the sole benefit of the workers. 1 have spoken in Chicago and elsewhere of the simple fact that the overwhelming majority of business men are like the rest of us. Most of us, whether we earn wages, run farms or run businesses, are in one sense business men. All they seek and all we seek is fair play based on the greater good of the greater number—fair plays on the part of the Government in levying taxes on us and fair play on the part of Government in protecting us against abuses. Once more this year we must choose between democracy in tax- ation and special privilege in tax- ation. Are you willing to turn the control of the Nation's taxes back to special privilege? I know the American answer to that question. Your pay envelope may be loaded with suggestions of fear and your dividend letter may be filled with propaganda, but the American peo- ple will neither be bluffed nor bludgeoned. The seeds of fear cannot bear fruit in the polling booth, Inside the polling booth every American man and woman stands as the equal of every other Ameri- can man and woman. There they have no superiors. There they bave no masters—save their own minds and consciences. There they are sovereign American citizens. ‘There on November 3 they will not fear to exercise that sovereignty. High, Wide ML&( Handsome! If you want to do yourself a fashionable favor, chozse Enna Jet‘:c'z broad straps for that next pair of shoes. They give the high, built-up look that’s the big news of the season. The straj are smartly wide—and the whole efiect is handsome!, $IZES 1 7O 12 9.6 WIDTHS AAAAA TO EES Cfl U‘l Green, broun, black suede; black, broun kid, gabardine; patent. In sizes 1 to 10; widths AAAA t C. §6 Wanda Black or broun kid with lne- | ings and perforations. Comes in sises 4 10 10; AAA to D and EEE. §5 America’s Smartest Walking Shoes Go Places Comfortably ENNA JETTICK BOOT SHOP 1337 F Street N.W. Pastry Triumphs Every Time WASHINGTON 6AS LIGHT cOM Gas &Y Lt . « e Yors ‘l:‘“ flavor o less e flexible, ¢ PANY o 4l T Street N. W. NWOOD d/%f '

Other pages from this issue: