Evening Star Newspaper, January 26, 1935, Page 4

£l - BRUND 15 WEARY AT END OF DAY Early Calm Disturbed When Confronted by Spelling of “Boad.” By the Associated Pry : FLEMINGTON, N. J., January 26— A misspelled four-letter word—"boad” for “boat’--was thrown at Brunc Richard Hauptmann by his Jersey prosecution yesterday to trip the car- penter’s alibi for the kidnap-murder of Baby Lindbergh. The world read that word nearly three years ago, when a ransom hoaxer sent Col. Charles A. Lindbergh on an empty search for the mythical “Boad Nellie,” where, he wrote, the baby would be found safe and well. Yesterday, in a stinging attack on Hauptmann's witness-stand story, At- torney General David T. Wilentz whipped out a little red nctebock and showed the prisoner the word “boad” in handwriting he would not deny was his own. Hauptmann was perspiring and per- | turbed when he stepped from the stand, although he had spent almost an entire day in calm denial that he ever saw the Lindbergh baby, “alive or dead,” or that he had anything to do with the ransom hoax. Told Truth in Court. Earlier Wilentz had Hauptmann ad- mit he told the truth only “to a cer- tain extent” when he was arrested in New York, although the prisoner in- sisted there was “no question” that he told the truth yesterday. . He also dragged out the prisoner’s German prison record after Haupt- mann, in ending his direct testimony, told Chief of Defense Counsel Edward J. Reilly that the police beat and; tricked him when they arrested him. Blame for the ransom goldbacks with which he was caught were placed by Hauptmann on the dead shoulders of Isador Fisch. The attorney general came back with Fisch’s name on cross-examina- tion Never Saw Lindbergh Baby. “He was a very good friend,” the carpenteg said. “Did he help you kidnap this Lind- bergh child and murder it?” Wilentz shot out. “I never saw—" “You never saw?” “__Mr. Lindbergh's child.” Over continued defense objections, Wilentz made Hauptmann say that he concealed a pistol, as well as five rolls of ransom bills, in holes he bored in his garage. (Intervening testimony appeared in all editions of yesterday's Star). After Fisch sailed for Europe, Hauptmann said, he began drawing his living expense from his stock account. In March, 1933, he said, he trans- ferred his bank account to his wife's maiden name. Anna Schoeffler, after he was involved in an automobile accident and feared the man he hit with his car would sue him. There was an out of court settlement. Twelve days earlier, he testified, he had deposited $1,250 in gold certifi- cates and gold coin in a bank in accordance with President. Roose- velt's order of an embargo on gold He had intended keeping the gold certificates and coin because he was afraid of inflation, but when Roose- velt's order came through he obeyed it. Reilly questioned him further, then turned to Miss Hildegrade Alexander’s identification of Hauptmann as the man she had seen watching Dr. Con- don in the Fordham road station of the New York Central Railroad in March, 1932. Hauptmann denied he had ever been in that station. Beaten by Police. Then Reilly asked Hauptmann about his treatment by police in New York when he was arrested. Q. Now, when you were taken to the New York police station were you beaten by the police? Wilentz objected, but he withdrew the objection after some argument. Q. During the period between the time you were brought in and the time you were asked to write and give certain exhibitions of your hand- writing and samples, were you beaten in that station house? A. Not in this time. Q. Well, now, when were beaten? Wilentz argued unsuccessfully against the admission of this testi- mony. Q. Were you beaten—yes or no? A. Yes, sir. Q. When did it start? A. The sec- ond night when I got arrested. Q. Where were you? A. New York police station, Q. After that you were taken to the Bronx? A. After that I was taken to the Bronx. Wilentz argued again, and Reilly had to reframe the questions. He led Hauptmann through the various Phases of his arrest, and his deten- tion at the Greenwich Village police station. Q. Now, in the station the first night what did they do to you, if any- thing? A. The first night they re- quired” the request writing. Q. Yes. Now, in writing did you spell the words of your own free will or did they tell you how to spell the words? A. Some of them words they spell it to me. Q. How do you spell “not”? N-o-t. J. Did they ask you to spell it n-o-t-e? A. I remember very well they put a “e” on it. Q How do you spell “signature?” A. S-i-g-n-u-t-u-r-e. Q. How did they tell you to spell it, 8-i-n-g? A. They did. Q. —n-a-t-u-r-e? A. They did. Q. “Singnature?” A. They did. Q. So when they were dictating the spelling, that was not your own free will in spelling, was it? A. It was not. Wrote at Dictation. Q. As far as the spelling of these ‘words that I have indicated, and other words that are misspelled in these request writings of yours, was that your voluntary spelling or your vol- untary act, or was it the act and spelling dictated to you by policemen and officials who wanted you to write it that way? A. It was because of the dictation. Q. And in that writing they kept on for how many hours? A. I can’t re- member exactly the time of the request writing, but I know real well it was late, it was really late in the night- time, probably after 12 o'clock. I refused to write. Q. What did they do to you? A. They forced me. They sald “You won't get any sleep, you got to write.” Q Did they do anything to you physically. A. Not exactly, but they didn’t give me any chance to sleep. Q. Did you get anything to eat? A. I can’t remember if I was asked for anything to eat at all or not. Q. Over what period did the so- ealled request writings, how long & period was it in all before they finished with you as far as the writings were concerned? A. From the hour of my arrest to, I'd say, around 2 o'clock in the morning the next day. Q. And how many times did he |2 A. you | request you to write? A. I can't re- call how many times. Q. Many times? A. Many times. I fell asleep on a chair when they poked me in the ribs and sald, “You write.” Q. What poked you in the ribs. A. I can't recall. Q. What with? A. With the hand. Q. While you were in that room or in the station house, were you hit with anything else besides the hand? A. No. Q. Were you hit during the writing during the different periods that you wrote? A. I got a couple of knocks in the—in the ribs, when I refused to write. Q. After the writing, before you went to the Bronx, did you get any knocks of any kind? A. Well, that is —I got the treatment, it wasn’t home at all. Q. Well, tell us about it and when | Vas it. A. It was in the evening, the | next day. Q. Where? A. The 20th. Q. What station house? A. New York police station—at the Greenwich street— | ' Q Before you went to the Bronx? A. Yes. Q. Now, what was the treatment? Wilentz again objected, but Reilly | argued he would relate the treatment | Hauptmann received with the state- | ment he made to District Attorney Samuel J. Foley of the Bronx, in | which he said he had been well treat- | ed. Frederick A. Pope, associate de- fense counsel, said the defense will ask the jury to consider the police treat- ’ ment. Told Truth “To Certain Extent” Wilentz opened his cross-examina- tion by asking Hauptmann if he had told the truth. Hauptmann sald he had. Q. You stand on the story that you gave in the Bronx, in the court house? A. To a certain extent. Wilentz asked him whether he told the truth to District Attorney Foley ) Tegarding his treatment by police, | Hauptmann said he meant he was treated fairly in the Bronx. Q. About this case, not about the treatment, about the Lindbergh case, | the murder, did you tell him the | truth about that? A. To a certain | extent. Q. And to a certain extent you didn’t tell him the truth, is that it?2 A I was— | Q. Did you tell him the truth only to a certain extent and lie to an- other extent? Pope objected and Wilentz with- drew his question. The attorney general then began questioning | Hauptmann about his German police record and his illegal entry into the United States, stressing the word “sneaked” as he talked and repeating it half a dozen times. Hauptmann admitted he had plan- ned to return to Germany soon and { was trying to make arrangements to do so without fear of arrest. Wilentz came forward to the wit- ness stand and stood close to Haupt- mann. In his hand he held a little | red note book. Q. Now I want to show you a little | book and ask you if it is yours. Is that your handwriting? Take yvour time about it. Look at it. A. Yes, | that’s my handwriting. i Q. That is your handwriting? A. Yes. Q. Take a look at this word par- ticularly. Tell me if that is your | handwriting, that one word there (No answer.) Q. Or did some policeman write it? A. I—1 can't remember every word I put in here. Unable to Remember. Q. Just the one word, that's all. There are only a few words on the whole page. That one word; tell me if that is in your handwriting? A It looks like my handwriting, but I can't remember I ever put it in. Q. You can't remember what? A. No, no. Q. Don’t mix it up now. Just stay with that word there for a minute; two dollars and fifty cents. You see that word? A. Yes. Q. Alongside of it? A. Yes. Q. Are they your figures? A. They must be my figures. Q. They must be your figures. Now let'’s get to this word that you use. A. Yes. Q. Yes, That is your word then, isn’t i1t? A. I can't remember if I ever put it in. Q. Well now, this isn't a joke. You know either it is your handwrit- ing or it isn’t. Is it your handwriting? A. It looks like my handwriting. Q. It looks like your handwriting? A. Yes. Q. Now, tell me, how do you spell “boat”? A. B-o-a-t. Q. Yes. Why did you spell it b-0-a-d? A. You wouldn’t mind to tell me how old this book is? | Q. I don't know how old it is. You know I don't know. A. Let me see it. Q. Why did you spell “boat” b-o-a-d? A. This book is probably eight years old. Q. All right. Why did you spell b-0o-a-d? A. Well, after you make improvements in your writing. Q. All right. So that at one time you used to spell “boat” b-o-a-d? A. Probably eight or ten years ago, and I am not quite sure if I put it in. Q. All right. At one time you used to spell “boat” b-o-a-d, didn’t you. Isn't that right? A. No, I don’t 80. Q. Eight years ago, 6 years ago, 10 4 - THE EVENING STAR, WASHINGTON, D. C., SATURDAY, JANUARY 2, 193 Copyright, A. P. Wirephoto. by arrow) and troopers are shown the crowd. State troopers guarding Richard Bruno Hauptmann, on trial for the < murder of the Lindbergh baby, had difficulty yesterday getting him through the jam in the Hunterdon County court room. The prisoner (indicated as they pushed their way through Hauptmann Faces Crucifixion At Hands of Wilentz Monday Court Room Is Held Breathless by First Short Conflict of Wills—Discrep- ancies in Bruno’s Statements. BY ANNE GORDON SUYDAM. Special Dispatch to The Star. FLEMINGTON, N. J, January 26.| —David T. Wilentz versus Bruno| | Richard Hauptmann, these two have | become the gladiators in this Flem- | ington arena, and though they fight| | with words only, so violent is the ten- | | son between them that you feel that { their bodies as well as their minds | | are pitted one against the other. For | Wilentz is not depending upon words | alone to send Hauptmann to the elec- | tric chair, nor is Hauptmann depend- | ing upon words alone to save his life. | | In the 35 terrific minutes when | | Wilentz put Hauptmann through a' | living hell upon the stand yesterday, I believe firmly that the demeanor, | the voices, the psychic quality of thes two men, influenced jury and spec-| 4 tator alike more than the words they Hauptmann's statements, there was |his own notebook with the word “boad” misspelled as it had been in the ransom note, and which he ad- mitted was in his handwriting, but | beyond the unwavering logic of Wi- lentz's questions and accusations, and beyond the carpenter’s sometimes | evasive answers, it was the stark ele- | mental combat of will against will which held the court room breathless | and appalled. Sword Drawn From Scabbard. It may be that Attorney General | Wilentz at some time during this trial has slipped upon points technical or | psychological, or has failed to seize an advantage. If so, I do not think most of us have been aware of it. But when heé stepped forward at 4 | o'clock yesterday afternoon to face | Hauptmann in cross-examination, he | was_the sword drawn from its scab- bard, he was the lightning flashing doom from a clouded sky, he was the avenging angel of all murdered babies. Hauptmann'’s eyes dart to his wife's for reassurance, and are drawn frre- sistibly back to those pf his accuser. Wilentz moves closer yet, he brings Hauptmann his own notebook, and together they examine it, heads seem- ingly bowed in brotherly perusal. Wilentz, master of suavity, lays his hand upon the arm of Hauptmann's chair, and Hauptmann, in a half- crouching position, rivets his 10 fingers together. The attorney gen- eral with raised voice relentlessly forces Hauptmann to admit that the writing is his. Hauptmann has looked at Col. and Mrs. Lindbergh and has not faltered, he has looked again and again at that sorrowful little sleeping suit with emotionless fixity, and he has faced the eyes of a dozen identifying wit- esses without flinching, but I think hat his blood runs hot with rage and turns cold with despair when he looks | uttered. There were discrepancies in | On the man who has threatened, who has promised to hang that ladder around his neck. Walks Like Automaton. His voice is so hollow and so flat, his face is so deadly white that you often feel that he is not a living man. Exiled from the natural realms of the living, unaccepted into the realms of the dead, walking like an automaton in and out of this court, talking in that strange bottled voice, he seems like the creature of a distorted imagi- nation. You cannot conceive of him playing leapfrog on the beach with his girl friends, or dandling Mann- fried on his knee, or twanging native melodies on a guitar in a wholesome, old-fashioned “bier-abend.” Bruno Richard Hauptmann may glance confidently at his wife, he may | smile as he comes back to his chalr, and say to her as I heard him say, “That man is only trying to get me excited,” but he knows today, if he has never known before, what a crucifixion awaits him on Monday at the hands of Mr. Wilentz. He is not apt to enjoy his week end. years ago, whenever it was, you used to spell “boat” b-0-a-d, isn’t that right? A. I don't know. Q. You spelled it in there, didn't JOUTYA T—— Q. You tell the truth now. Didn't you spell it in there? A. Now, listen. I can't remember whether I put it in there. Fisher and Pope Object. Fisher objected and Pope objected. Wilentz said it couldn’t be object] able twice, but Fisher retorted it “was twice objectionable.” Justice Trenchard upheld the ob- Jection. Wilentz showed the book to Haupt- mann again, but he insisted he could not remember whether he wrote in the book. Q. The reason you don’t say yes or no is because you know you wrote “Boad” when you got the fifty thou- sand from Condon, isn't that right A. No. sir. Q. Boad Nelly. Look at it. A. No. . Do you see the word “Boad Nelly”? A. I see it, certainly. Q. Look at it again right underneath there, again “Boad,” do you see that? A. T see it. Q. B-o-a-d? A. T see it. Wilentz made Hauptmann examine each letter, pointed out what he sug- gested were similarities between the word in the book and the word as it appeared in the note given to Dr. Condon after the ransom payment, in which it was said the baby would be found on the “Boad Nellie.” He showed him brokers’ checks and demanded to know if the “X’s” weren't the same as those on the ransom notes. The attorney general turned next to Hauptmann's work and brought forth the admission Hauptmann had not worked regularly as a carpenter since April, 1932, but had spent his time speculating in the stock merket. Gave Money to Broker. Q. Every dollar that you said that Fisch gave you or anybody else gave you, so far as delivering it to the broker, you are the one that gave it to him, aren’t you? A. Yes, sir. Q. And the only man that knows about any moneys between you and Fisch, so far as the stocks are con- cerned, is the man that is dead, Fisch; isn’t that right? . A. I don't know; I guess. He said to me he is keeping book. He is the only man, though? . As far as I know. . Just between the two of you? Q. He was your best friend, wasn't he? A. Well, but— Q. You don't say so? A. He was very good friend. Q. Did he help you kidnap this Lindbergh child and murder it? A. I never saw— Q. You never saw? A. Mr. Lindbergh’s child. Q. But Fisch didn't help you, did he? Fisher objected, and Justice Trench- ard cautioned him not to shout his objections. When Wilentz produced a board from Hauptmann's garage—the board in which money had been found stuffed in holes—and asked Haupt- mann if he hadn’t drilled the holes for the money, Hauptmann replied he drilled them for small bits. Wilentz persisted, but Hauptmann Bhe Foesing FHtar I don’t say best friend, REILLY ANNOUNCES Spectators Crowd Hauptmann at Trial | said he could not remember what he told District Aitorney Foley. Wilentz asked about one of the larger holes, but Reilly objected strenuously on the ground the ques- tion was immaterial, and since it was not shown that it had any connection with the kidnaping, would tend to prejudice the jurors subconsciously. Wilentz argued the point and Justice Trenchard upheld him The question was repeated. Q. What did you put in it? put a small pistol in it. Q. Small pistol? A. Yes. Q. So that you had the pistol hid- den in here? A. Yes. Q. And you had the five rolls of bills there? A. Yes. Q. Let me ask you this: You gave your name when you were sworn in as a witness as Bruno Richard Haupt- mann. That is true, isn't it? A. Bruno Richard Hauptmann. Q. Is that the only name you use? A. It is the only name I use. Q. Haven't you used other names? A. I used another name on the boat when I came over first. Q. What was the name you used on the boat? A. I guess it was Perl- meyer. Q. What was the first name—John? A. Well, I really don't know the first name. Q. Are you the cemetery John that was up in Woodlawn Cemetery? A Positively not. Q. Are you the cemetery John that was in the other cemetery. A. No, I never was in the cemetery. Q. Never were? A. No, sir. \CONFERENCE OPENED BY WOMAN’S PARTY | Registration to Continue Through Tomorrow—O0bjective Repeal of Marriage Clause. Al The regional conference of the Na- | tional Woman's Party opened this morning with registration in the Dodge Hotel and will continue through tomorrow. The objective of the conference here is to plan an in- | tensive drive to secure repeal of the | marriage clause of the economy act {and assist in the campaign for pas- sage of the equal rights amendment More than 150 women from Mary- land, Virginia, Pennsylvania and the District .are taking part in the con- ference. Mrs. George V. Morey is the local chairman in charge of ar- rangements. G. W. OFFERS SPECIAL COURSE FOR TEACHERS «“psychology of Character” to Be Taught as Aid to Public School Experiment. Co-operating with the Washington public schools, George Washington University will offer a special course, “Psychology of Character,” for teach- ers in the character education experi- ment, it was announced today. Dr. Mitchell Dreese, associate pro- fessor of educational psychology and executive officer of the psychology de- partment, will direct the course. The class will meet on Tuesdays from 7:30 to 9:10 p.m., beginning February 1. The course is not confined to active teachers, Others who desire to take it will earn two hours credit, but em- ployed teachers may add another hour by laboratory work in their own school rooms. - ADVERTISENENTS B v Receivep HERE Hunton’s Pharmacy 9th and U Sts. N.W Is an Authorized Star Branch Office OU are sure of reaching the attention of the vast majority of people in and around Washington through a Star Classified Advertisement. No need to w:;it until it is convenient to come down to the main office with the copy— it may be left at any Branch Offices. It will of the authorized Star be promptly forwarded to appear in the first available issue. There are no fees for branch office service— only regular rates are charged. Star Classified Advertisements Bring Results SURPRISE WITNESS Man to Testify to Seeing|“% Him in Bronx Night of Kidnaping. (Continued From First Page.) was an alien illegally ia this country, and then demanded whether the wit- ness had told and was telling the truth. “You have had the opportunity in this court today and you still have an opportunity this minute to tell the whole truth,” he reminded Haupt- mann. “Have you told the truth?” “I told the truth already,” was the answer. That was the opening. Wilentz de- manded if the story the witness had told was the same he gave in the Bronx after his arrest. “To a certain extent,” Hauptmann sald Weakly. A few minutes later he was answering a similar inquiry with almost the same words—"To a certain extent, yes; to a certain extent, no.” Wilentz dinned that point into the jury’s ears for a few moments, and then swung to Hauptmann's criminal record in Germany. 'He drew from the defendant testimony on his con- victions for crime after the World ‘War, his prison term, his subsequent arrests, his escape from jail. Haupt- mann was reluctant in his answers at times and Wilentz capitalized on that reluctance. Back abruptly went the questioning to the story of Hauptmann's illegal entry into the United States. Wilentz said “sneaked” every time he referred to Hauptmann's efforts to smuggle himself into this country. Then the prosecution chief sprung the first surprise of the cross-examina- tion. He thrust into Hauptmann's hand a cheap red memorandum book open at a certain page. His voice was loud, insistent. “Is that your handwriting?” “Yes, that's my handwriting,” con- ceded Hauptmann, twisting in his chair. “Take a look at this word particu- larly. Tell me if that is your hand- writing, that one word there.” Hauptmann made no answer. He stared dully at the open page as if he could not comprehend what he saw. Wilentz gave him no time. pounded away at the question until the, pallid prisoner finally acknowl- edged, “It looks like my handwriting, but I can’t remember I ever put it in.” Then Wilentz let the tense court knaw the item he was forcing Haupt- manpn to examine. It was the nota- : “$2.25 boad.” ‘The last kidnap note delivered in return for the ransom said the baby was on the “boad Nelly,” and Wilentz no time in bringing this simi- larity of misspelling emphatically be- fore the jury. He asked Hauptmann how he spelled “boat” and the witness replied cor- rectly. Then the at‘torney general shof him, “Why did you spell ‘boat’ b-0-a-d?” Hauptmann murmured the book was several years old and he had improved his language. “All right,” Wilertz snapped, “at one time you used to spell ‘boat’ b-0-a-d, didn’t you? Isn’t that right?” “No, I don't think so0.” Bruno Glares at Wilentz. Hauptmann's white face was set de- terminedly. Wilentz’s face was only a few feet from his own and he glared at the little attorney. Questions ripped out in quick suc- cession, all on the same point, and Hauptmann replied, “I can't say yes or no,” and “I don't remember every putting the word in.” Annoyance in his voice, Wilentz finally shouted: “The reason you don’t say yes or no is because you know you wrote ‘boad’ when you got the $50,000 from (Dr. J. F) Condon; isn't that right?” “No, sir,” the witness insisted. But Wilentz still hammered the | point. He shoved the note book and | the final ransom note into the pris- | oner’s hands and forced him to com- ipnre the two “boad’s.” He made him admit the spelling was the same, letter formations the same, the manner of writing the same. A few minutes later he was having Hauptmann compare the “X's” of his conceded writing with the strange “X's” of the ransom notes. Haupt- mann’s calmness appeared to be van- ishing rapidly under the questions. The attorney general hit a new line of attack. He educed testimony that Hauptmann had not worked regularly as a carpenter since April, 1932, the | month the ransom was paid, and that he had been occupied as a Wall Street operator. He touched on Haupt- mann’s partnership with ! Fisch and lingered sarcastically on the Isador | | fact Pisch was dead and no one else | could account for the $14,600 ransorj | money Hauptmann said Fisch gave He | him. As that questioning was going on, Wilentz toyed idly with a hoard with some holes bored in it. It was the board in which five tightly wadded rolls of ransom money and a small automatic pistol were found, hidden in the Hauptmann garage. He showed it to Hauptmann and Hauptmann identified it, explaini; he had originally drilled the holés for keeping small bits handy. Wilentz demanded if he hadn't told Bronx authorities he drilled the holes to keep the money in, but the witness | doggedly insisted the holes were fop bits. | Then the attorney general inquired silkily, “What did you have that other | hole for?” he idly indicated the pistol | receptacle Defense lawyers objected, but werg overruled, and Hauptmann was forced to tell the jury, “I put a small pistol in it.” | A few minutes later court adjourned | and Hauptmann stepped wearily from the stand. He looked tired and perspi- ration wet his forehead. His previous testimony had been | commonplace compared with that | driving half hour. It had been cons cerned with his stock market trans. actions, his receipt of money from Fisch and other financial details. It was on the financial note his testi- | mony ended, for earlier he had denied categorically all connection with the Lindbergh kidnaping. Reilly spent considerable time try- ing to develop that Hauptmann had been mistreated by police when he was making the “request writings which were said by the State’s hand- writing experts to conform' with his admitted writings and those on the ransom notes. Q. What did they do to you? A. They forced me. They said “You won't get any sleep; you ge* to write.” - Q. Did they do anything to von physically? A. Not exactly, but thé didn’t give me any chance to sleep.s Q. Were you hit during the differeft periods that you wrote? A. I got®m couple of knocks in the—in the rifs when I refused to write. Wilentz's objections to this line ¢f questioning were overruied by Justiee Trenchard. - Hauptmann said that the misspell~ ing of the words “not” and ‘“signg- ture,” spelled in both the ransom notes and the request writings #s “note” and “singnature,” was dictated to him by police officers : WoOoDWARD & LOTHROP 0™ II™F anD G StreeTs For Her A—Handsome Slips in pure-dye silk crepe. tearose, sizes 11 to 17 JuNIorR Misses’ FURNISHINGS, FOURTH FLOOR. B—White Gloves—washable doeskin pullons for daytime, $4. 8- button Glace Kid for more formal affairs GLOVES, A1sie C—Patent Leather Envelope Bag in red, white, brown, black or navy. 11, FmsT FLOOR. Frém a smart group of new Spring bags LEATHER GoODS, AIsLe 8, FIrsT FLOOR, D—Fitted Leather Case with 10 Pyralin toilet articles in re- movable tray.........cccoeeecececacacnns LUGGAGE, FOURTE FLOOR. Prone District 5300 $4.50 o $14.95 For Him E—Military Brush Set—two brushes, comb and file in leather case $2.50 Bovs' FURNISHINGS, FOURTH FLOOR. F—Elgin 15-jewel Wrist Watch in 14-karat solid, white or yellow gold case.. FINE JEWELRY, FIRST FLOOR. G—Jiffy Kodak—press a button and it is open, $9. With leather case $10.85 Other Kodaks, $8 to $40 CAMERAS, FOURTH PLOOR. H—Tennis Racquet, made tions of the French ace, Henri Cochet....... to the specifica- $4.95 Other Racquets, $3.95 to $15 SPORTING GooDS, FOURTH FLOOR,