Evening Star Newspaper, March 16, 1895, Page 15

PORANDAGAING? SUFFRAGE _Csinions Expressed by Cit- izens of the District. ~ Restlls of an Evening Star Canvass to Obtain an Express: ion of Representative Pubic Opinion “Should suffrage be restored to the Dis- trict of Columbia?” That is the question on which several hundred citizens have communicated their views tc The Star. Some have merely given their votes for or against suffrage; others have accompanied their votes with brief comments, explaining why they op- - pese or favor a restoration of suffrage. Some who favor a limited suffrage have briefly indicated what qualifications should, in their opinion, be required, and others have proposed changes in the District's form of government, the change most fre- quently suggested being that of representa- tion in Congress. The Star has endeavored to obtain a fair expression of representative public opinion upon the question of suffrage. To this end it sent out to about 1,750 citizens of the District postal cards, on which the , following was printed: Dear Sir: In view of the current agita- tion The Evening Star desires to get an expression of representative public opinion upon the question:,“Should suffrage be re- stored to the District of Columbia?’ By voting upon the accompanying re- turn postal card and mailing it to The Star office you will greatly oblige. Write in the blank space the word “favor” or “oppose,” according to your view of the matter, and sign your name. EDITOR EVENING STAR. On the return postal there was a space to record one’s vote and also room for brief remarks. In sending out the postal cards the business directory was chiefly used, cards being addressed to representa- tives of every business, calling or profes- sion classified in the directory. In addi- tion to that the opinions of representative - workingmen, of citizens not actively en- gaged in business, and of citizens who take active part in such politics as the District has, were solicited. The result of this postal card canvass, it is believed, may be taken as representing very fairly the atti- tude toward the suffrage question of the citizens of Washington, business men, pro- perty owners, and those who for one rea- son or ancther are interested in the wel- fare of the city. Of the 1,750 citizens ad- dressed, 795 returned replies, a very large “ number not regarding the question of mo- ment enough, or not being sufliciently in- terested in it, to vote upon it. The an- swers that were returned, however, by nearly eight hundred citizens, make an in- teresting showing. Of the 795 votes cast, 531 were against a restoration of suffrage, and 264 in favor of such restoration, there being more than two to one against suffrage. Of the 531 voting against suffrage, 472 made no quali- fication whatever, while 59 voted against a restoration of suffrage such as ‘ormerly existed in the District, but suggested a form of government with suffrage, or a limited suffrage they would favor. One hundred and ninety-one citizens voted un- qualifiedly for 2 restoration of suffrage, the ~ other 73 who voted for suffrage having - coupled their votes with suggestions as to some qualifications to be required. Below is given in detail the results of The Star's canvass. OPPOSED TO SUFFRAGE Gitizens Who Vote Against a Restoration of the Ballot. “ Unqualifiedly Opposed. Ames, John G.:I see no real advantage likely to result from the restoration of suffrage, either to individual or municipal interests. We are well governed now. The change involved in suffrage would probably be for the worse rather than the better. Adams, Byron S.: We may not have the best governed city, but we have the purest, I believe. Allen, Charles: It would be impossible to get qualified suffrage. No more boards of public works. No more ignorant hordes from Maryland and Virginia to vote away money to plunderers, pur- chasing contracts at prices dguble the worth of the work. No more ballot box thefts, as when the late John T. Given was cheated out of his election as mayor. Anaerson, Notley: The present govern- ment is good enough for me. Acker, Walter H.: While the present sys- . tem could be somewhat improved, yet it is so much superior to our experience under suffrage, that I do not hesitate to yote in favor of being governed by three Commissioners. Barry, David S.: As a general rule I am opposed to the disfranchisement of Amer- ican citizens, but the conditions are pe- culiar here, and Washington is evidently better off under the protection of the federal government than if_ suffrage should be restored and the feather dus- ter legislature revisef. Bittinger, B. F.: While not perfect, I be- eve our present form of government to be well adapted to our community, ard to promise the best results. - Brown, Glenn: When we _ compare our municipal government with such govern- ments as New York, Chicago, Phil«iel- phia, etc., we should be contented and thankful. Burdett, S. S.: Let well enough alone. Brady, Wm. N.: I know what we have, but we do not know what we may get by making a change—always let well enough alone is my motto. Bovee, Dr. John N.: I saw too much of the old regime to favor suffrage. Beall, Fillmore.: I oppose a restoration of suffrace because I believe suffrage here would place in control of affairs an unde- sirable element of population, and be- cause the experiment of the present form of government here is a success. Biscoe, H. L.: Our present form of gov- ernment suits me. We have a good local government. We are the wards of Con- gress. We are now a quiet, law-abiding .* people. We have a gocd board of trade, and with the assistance of The Evening Star, always throwing its search lights upon every action of our local and gen- eral government, watching the interests of our people, we need not fear having to send for Dr. Parkkurst. Blunt, H. W.: I am in favor of suffrage as a general principle, but decidedly cppos- ed to it under our existing conditions. Beveridge, M. W.: I consider our present form cf government the best of any city in the United States, especially for econo- my and guarded so that it !s free from fraud. Botcler, J. W.: The present form of gov- -* ernment is undoubtedly the best that could be devised for the District of Co- ° lumpia. Butler, Rev. J. G.: Let well erougk alone. Have excellent’ government under our Commissioners, and desire no change. Boynton, H. V.:'I regard the present form of government in this District as the most honest, efficient and satisfactory of \ any municipality in the land. I helieve suffrage would %e a very serious mis- fortune to the national capital. Bagger, Louis: On general principles I am, of course, in favor of suffrage. But the peculiar ccrditions of the District of Co- lumbia are such that I do not believe suf- frage in our case would advance the pub- lic good. When I was managing editor of the Patriot, we had a trial—the so- called “feather-duster” legislature. Do you remember it? No more of that for me. Byram, Jas. H.: I have lived under all the different kinds of governments of our city, and believe this present form is the best for taxpayers; even if the rates are a little high. Barker, Richard: Let those who want suf- frage go to the states. Brooke, Richard N.: Whatever the faults of the present system, the interests of Washington were better committed to Congress than to such politicians as, under an extension of suffrage, would Inevitably gain control. Bliss, George H:: We now live in peace and quiet, are not worried by elections every year, we have an uncorrupt and gcod city government and should be sat- isfied and let well enough alone. Benzler, Herman: I believe in letting good enough alone. Bryan, J. B.: I think our form is the best that can be had if the President selects the best men. Bryan, Samuel M.: Nothing but evil ap- peared to result from suffrage in this District. Commissioners are not at all times what they should be, but they have never been, to my knowledge, so thor- oughly objectionable as the representa- tives of the proletariat at the time when suffrage prevailed in this District, Barker, R. W.: No negro rule for me. Chickering, J. W.: Theoretically I favor universal suffrage with certain qualifica- tions. But practically I consider Wash- ington better governed than New York, Philadelphia or Chicago. Clarke, Dr. Danl. B.: I believe one good competent Commissioner better than three. Clephane, Walter At present we have the cleanest municipal administration in the country. Suffrage wouid be apt to expose u3 to all the evils of “bossism” and Tammany Hall. Chandlee, W. E.: I think the present sys- tem has given us the best government we have ever had in point of economy and smooth sailing. I believe a return to the suffrage plan under present conditions of citizenship would be an expensive experi- ment for the taxpayer. Church, C. B.: My fifty-four years of «x- perience as a taxpayer fully satisfies me that the present form of government is the best we ever had in this District. Cutter, E. C.: Our last experience in this respect {Is sufficient to convince me that the existing connection with the general government in the affairs of the District and in participating in paying part of the taxes are much better than could be = expected by the restoration of suffrage. Coues, Elliott: We have a better govern- ment than we should be likely to secure by restoration of suffrage. Callan, B.: I think the present form of government is the best for the people cf the District. Church, Melville: Suffrage means a great deal of wrangling and commotion to clect perhaps three or more representatives in Congress, who will take no more per- sonal interest and secure no more fa- vorable legislation than the members of the District committees at present. Suf- frage may cause Washington to cease to be the ward of the nation, which would be deplorable. Clark, T. Edw.: I have seen enough of suf- frage in the District of Columbia to satis- fy me that its restoration would be little short of a calamity. The present govern- ment is far from perfect, but is infinite- ly preferable to an elective system. Crane, J. M.: With suffrage we would largely lose the support and sympathy of Congress, which we now receive. We are the best governed city in the country, and free from political pulls. Crosby, W. H.: I am very well satisfied with the present form of government,but do favor District men to fill District offices. 5 Cochran, Geo. W.: From the conceded cor- ruption in municipal affairs of all the large cities of this country, and its at- tending demoralization of the people, I am firmly of the opinion our present form of government is the best for all inter- ests. The Commissioners being appoint- ed by the President, and responsible to him for their official conduct, should have the appointing of all subordinates. And as all their financial transactions are re- viewed and passed on by the Treasury Department, there appears to me very little chance of corruption. My opinion is the present form of government is the best for a territory that belongs to the United States, and must for all time re- main subject to government authority. Collins, R. J.: I consider the equities as now existing on part of general govern- ment toward the local government as be- ing mcre important than suffrage, with the full responsibilities attached thereto. Clay, Cecil: The seat of government should be, as far as possible, free from the dis- turbing influences of local politics. The excellent working of the present system, calling for no “investigations,” sufficient- ly answers any call for change. Cissel, BE. According to the present law of voting I am in favor of the pres- ent administration of affairs, Carrington, Jas. McD.: I think the Dis- trict was intended to be, and is, the ward of the nation. I think, for its best in- terests, this idea should be encouraged. I think suffrage tends to estrange this feel- ing, and makes it somewhat of an inde- pendent state, which would diminish na- tional interest, and would ultimately en- danger Washington as the permanent capital of the national government. I think this idea in all its bearings might be developed with great force. Croissant, J. D.: Every property interest in ovr city would seriously suffer by a change. The national capital would be- come localized in its administration. Let us let well enough alone. Copp, Henry N.: No human government is perfect. Our District government is as near satisfactory as any can be under our American system. Crissey, S. L.: I vividly recall the time when he ee ee and think our present form of government in ev. better. pied Cox, M. S.: A restoration of suff: wouid be suicidal folly. Sib ee Cabell, Wm. D.: I decidedly oppose a re- storation of suffrage. Nothing but evil would come of it in the family, in busi- ness, in society, in politics. Let well enough alone. Pray more for continu- ance of the blessings now enjoyed. Cralle, Richard K.: I cannot imagine a greater misfortune than the restoration of suffrage to the District of Columbia. Let well enough alone. Clark, Wm. D.: I think the present form much better than would follow a restora- tion of suffrag Carver, Frank The present form of government for this District suits too well to want a change at present. Deane, L.: Our District is the best gov- erned municipal community that I know of. We have better order, better enforce- ment of good rules and regulations; bet- ter police, better department service, less of rings and saloon politicians. Hav- ing once tried suffrage and borne the very heavy burden of a District legisla- ture, why do we want to repeat the mis- erable experiment? Denham, Thomas §8.: I don’t want what THE EVENING STAR, SATURDAY, MARCH ,16, 189:-TWENTY-FOUR PAGES. . 15 I have now voted away by the lower classes of the city. Denver, Arthur F. C.: On general prin- ciples I favor suffrage where represen- tation can be had, and the right con- fined to property or educational qualifica- tion. The rabble and tramps should be left cut. Our present form of govern- ment is the best for the District. Deale, Henry B.: The present form of gov- ernment for the District is satisfactory and efficient. Devlin, E.: We have a clean and honest local government, which will bear _com- parizon with any city in the United States, for instance, take New York, Phil- adelphia, Chicago or any other city, ard you will find Washington by far the most sconomicelixs quiet and best governed of all. Dubant, P. M.: The present is, I think, a model government, and I should regret very much the slightest change in it. Dowell, J. C.: Our present system would seem to be far more preferable than a return to suffrage and former conditions thereunder. Douglass, J. W.: While I was a Comfnis- sioner a bill to have only one Commis- sioner was sent to us for a report. I pro- posed the following reply: ‘The Commis- sioners are delighted with the plan, but cannot agree upon the man.” The board did not care to drop into verse, so we simply said that the present plan seemed to work well. Doubleday, H. H.: While I am no poli- ticlan, my business has brought me into contact with moderately intelligent men— not politicians—in various cities of the United States, and from what I learn, I believe we have the best form of govern- ment yet devised for any of our large towns. Depue, Abraham: I have lived under both forms of city government, and much pre- fer the present form. DuBois, James T.: To give up a first-class certainty for a third-class probability would be the acme of stupidity. In the present form of government we have a Heat class certainty. Let us hold fast to Darneille, Philip A.: I am of the opinion that we are too near ‘“‘My Maryland” and Virginia. This element will not do. Ewin, Jas. L.: Your question applics of course to present conditions. Transients and others having no property interests are still too numerous here, it seems to me. Elliott, John H.: Better to bear the good we have than fly to ills we know well of. Easton, Wilham B.: The recollection of violence and disorder around the polls is too fresh to need repeating. Emmons, Geo. E.: Any local government with the expectation of the continuation of division of appropriations, half by the United States would be a farce. The local government would necessarily have to be of the same political character as that of administration of the United States. Earnshaw, B. B.: No more “feather-dus- ter rule” for me. Edmonds, Jas. B.: I think it would be ex- tremely unwise to achieve local suffrage. Emmons, 8. F.: The recent exposures of corruption in municipal affairs of our large cities throughout the country teach us that our present city government, which, in spite of its imperfections, is fairly honest, is preferable to our inter- ests with the suffrage extended to the large proportion of our population that is too ignorant to vote intelligently, and would probably be controlled by dema- gogues and ward politicians. Fahey, D. C.: We have had it once and it proved a failure, and I do not care about seeing it again. Fay, E. A.: Our experience of suffrage in this District in the past proves that, with so large a population of ignorant and irresponsible voters, it does not result in gcod government. Franzoni, C. W.: I should be sorry to see the quiet of our beautiful city disturbed by the boisterous demonstrations con- nected with so-called suffrage. Fitch, James E.: I should be very sorry to see a restoration of suffrage in the District: of Columbia. Fields, Thomas M.: Our burdens have been light, and we have been prosper- ous and contented under the present sys- tem, and the future promises the same. Faherty, W. J.: It has always proven a failure in the District, and of no benefit to the people thereof. Friedrich, L. L.: Unless taxpayers or edu- cation be the criterion. Our present form of government is good enough for me. Fishbaugh, C. H.: The present form cf government Is the best the city has ever had, and good enough for me. Fletcher, Wm. H.: Washington city is now the best governed city in the world. Frey, Abram: I oppose a restoration of suffrage to the District of Columbia for the reason that the worst element of those having suffrage would so far out- number the better class that I fear it would be impossible to elect a good line of officers. Fullerton, James: The Constitution of the United States prescribes that Congress shall have exclusive jurisdiction over this District, which has been set apart for the benefit of the people of all the states. The existing form of government, recognizing the paramount rights of the people repre- sented by Congress, is at the same time so well adapted to the protection and pro- motion of the interests of the residents of the District that it should not be lightly changed or subjected to the vicissitudes attendant upon universal suffrage here. Gawler, Joseph: The present form of gov- ernment is good enough for me. Germuiller, F.: The present form of gov- ernment, in my opinion, is far superior to the restoration of suffrage. Graves, Edward: Am satisfied with present form of government. Goldsborough, E. K.: The intrigue and demoralization in the republican and democratic parties, north, south, east and west, warn us to let well enough alone. To stay in the frying pan and not get Into the fire. Glover, Chas. C.: The present form of gov- ernment is admirable. It would be diffi- cult to improve it. By restoring suffrage you destroy values, increase taxatiou and end at once that most satisfactory ar- rangement, the payment of one-half of the expenses of the District by the gen- eral government. Geier, Joseph: No! No, sir! No such fool- ishness for me. I have had enough. Greenlees, Arch’d: Suffrage would be of doubtful value to us, and if secured would in all probability, lead to such changes in our present financial relation with Congress as to prove most disadvan- tageous to us. Gannett, Henry: Because one-third the population are negroes, and a large pro- portion of the white population are non- residents. I do not believe that under the circumstances our municipal business would be well conducted. Gaddis, Adam H.: I think we have a first- class government, suffrage would only make it a worse one. New York city, for instance. Graham, Andrew B.: The present form of government is not entirely satisfactory, yet it is a decided improvement over the former style. Gray, J. H.: I fear a popular election would make ts trouble. Gray, Y¥.: I oppose a restoration of suffrage. My reason for so doing is that our local government is certainly above partisanship, and by competent high- minded men selected for capacity only. Such would not be the case if suffrage were participated in. Gill, Edward C.: Washington would not be the city it is today had we suffrage. Gurley, Charles L.: Have lived under all the forms of local government the Dis- trict has had during the last forty years and believe the present the most satis- factory. Want no more election-day fights and “plug-pgly” riots. Hungerford, William A.: I think we have a model municipal government, and with “home rule” and “civil service” it would be perfection itself! Hickling, D. Percy: I think that the pres- ent form of gcvernment is the best that can be obtained under the existing cir- cumstances. Hoffman, J. A.: When I compare Wash. ington with other large cities, I am per- fectly satisfied with this government. Hoover, S. Smith, jr.: I think the tax- payers are perfectly Satisfied with the present form of government. us Hickling, Danl. P.: ‘“'Tis better as it is. Hubbard, Gardiner G.: We have now an excellent city government; the great ob- jection is the want of money for city pur- poses. If the citizens voted away money we should be required to pay the whole amount instead of dividing it with the United States. Hopfenmaier, Lewis: Let well enough alone. Hood, T. B.: I fear the repetition of the scenes of the “Territorial” govern- ment of some years since, while satisfied that the existing government is economi- cal and free from the corruption existing in other cities and which is associated with the “right of suffrage.” Hartig, Loui: ‘Let well enough alone.” Hall, Philio The present form of gov- ernment i3 by .0 means perfect, yet, with the experience of former years in my mind, I am willing to bear the ills we have rather than to fly to those we know not of. I hope agitation of this question will receive a quietus, and that the na- tional capital will become what she is destined to be, the most attractive city of the world. Henderson, Richard W.: I have known Washington under ‘both ysuffrage and its present form of gove! it, and as a, taxpayer and loyal ci! n\am perfectly satisfied as it is at present governed. Horner, F. R.: I oppose—emphatically a restoration of suffrage. 5 Hopkins, Archibald: inte ney movere.” We are confessedly ter off than any other municipality in .the country. A change promises no efit and holds large possibilities of harm. Hungerford, Thos. W.: l-oppose a restora- tion of suffrage to the District of Colum- bia for the good of th mmuaity. Hood, James F.: Coni ing number of people within the limited area they occupy, I regard the District of Columbia as the most faithfully, efficiently and economically governed feommuyity in the United States. Hinckley, Robert: The nation as a whole will take better care of us than we coulda control such a small suffrage. Heilbrun, Louis: This being the capital city, where strangers and travelers con- gregate, where retired merchants, me- chanics and politicians domicile, our pres- ent quiet and orderly government is preferable to a noisy, turbelant one,which suffrage will create. Hill, Jas. G.: I oppose a restoration of suf- frage to the District of Columbia. We tried it once. Heaton, C. M., jr.: Takoma Park, D. C.: I am against a restoration of suffrage to the District of Columbia first, last and all the time. It would be but an empty" thing to be taken away from us at any time. Suffrage in the District of Colum- bla would be but a name. Harban, J. H,: I object to a-restoration of suffrage to the District of Columbia most emphatically. Hazen, D. H.: I am satisfied with the ‘ United States partnership. I have lived through two or three elections in this Dis- trict ‘and am satisfied. Hay, E. Bs Experience in the matter in our District not a good criterion in its favor. Heaton, Frank M.: Our present form of government is a good one, works without friction, is free from corruption and can- not be improved upon by a return to the suffrage as exercised at the elections held a score of years ago and more in this city. “Let well enough alone” should be the motto of every good citizen. Jewell, Claudius B.: When I look back and remember our “feather. duster legisla- ture” I cannot see wherein we should be benefited by suffrage. Many things can be said against it. Congress would feel absolved from a great deal of responsi- bility as regar District. affairs and would not feel the interest in us that they do now—no, not half. Janney, B. T.: I can conceive of no greater misfortune to the District of Columbia than the restoration of suffrage. Johnson, J. B.: Washington is better gov- erned than New York, Chicago or Phila- delphia. Jarvis, T.: I am opposed to a restoration of suffrage to the District of Columbia. ‘Well do I remember the lawless mob that paraded our streets at the last election in our city. A person could not look out- side of his door but he would be insulted and knocked down if he uttered a word. No! No! No! Let _us have peace. Johnson, Jerome F.: Ordinarily Congress will do what is best for the District. It is, moréover, a great saving of expense as it is, and untold annoyance, as those who had experience in the former times well remember. Johnston, William W., M.D.: I should re- gard the restoration of suffrage as a fatal mistake. > Judd, John G.: The present form of govern- ment is good enough for me. It needs watching. We do not need imported ne- groes to fill offices. Let the war cry be “Only District men for: District offices.” ‘That is better than suffrage and feather duster legislatures. » i Johnson, Jos. Taber: I feel with our fore- fathers that we should not have taxa- tion without representation,i- but our former experience with: suffrage here is the only reason for my; opposition. Johnson, J. Harrison: At present I am at a loss to see whereby: this District can or would be benefited by suffrage, except by certain limitation. 4 Knight, Octavius: Thesexisting form of government appears to! me more desirable than one based on manhood soffrage in a community embracing so considerable a percentage of men not Well qualified for self-sovernment. te Kettler, Chas. H.: I would not like to see suffrage any more. 3B t% + King, C. E.: Better e those ills we have than fly to those we know not of. King, G. N. P.: Let welF enough ‘alone. Leipold, R. H.: With a vivid olléction of the last municipal eleetion in this city, I prefer to adhere to the present system until a better one can be devised. Leech, J. F.: May and the Senate ever protect us from such a dire fate. Larcombe, B. F.: I am very: well satisfied with the present form of government for the District. Lampton, W. J.: Remarks are unneces- sary, unless it might be a few profane ones applied to any person or persons advocating such a restoration. Larner, R. M.: Those of us who have had experience during “feather duster’ leg- islature period want no more of it in ours. Let well enough alone. Leighton, B. F.: I am not in favor of a restoration of suffrage because, first, suffrage would disturb the present equit- able apportionment of expenses between the United States and the District; sec- ond, a large portion of our best citizens still retain their voting residence in the states; third, the sole power to legislate for the District is vested in Congress and cannot be delegated; fourth, suffrage, as applied to government of large cities, is a dismal failure. Lamb, Francis R.: Restoration of suffrage would give the colored population the control of the District. Lowdermilk, W. H.: We have the best and cleanest city government in America, and practical good government far outweighs all exaggerated sentimental suffering on the part of citizens, who imagine they have lost something because they can’t vote. Lisner, A.: I think the present form of wovernmient is well adapted to the Dis- trict. Little, Geo. O.: Could we be as the other territories, suffrage would be most de- sirable, but as long as the government contributes one-half it will have the real legislature in its hands, and will be more interested in and liberal toward the Dis- trict by having it. “2 Lyon, Simon: I am_ satisfied with the Furity of our municipal system, and as the workings of our local affairs is sat- isfactory, I do not desire a change. Restoration of suffrage might bring about corruption and political bossism, which does not now exist. Lovejoy, J. W. H.: I think the present form the best we have ever had, because I remember vividly the reports of the dis- graceful conduct in the pandemoniums called primary meetings under the late suffrage regime, and witnessed the row- dyism at the polls. The character and evident importation of a large number of the voters. The abstention of many re- spectable people from voting. Under all circumstances we are urder the exclusive control of Congress. Now, whatever au- thority is delegated, the responsibility is more concentrated, fixed and evident. ‘Three men are better than forty or fifty. The government cheaper. Congress more likely to recognize and acknowledge substantially its own'obifgations. Men appointed by the President. afid Senate more likely to be chosen by their reputa- tion for honesty, ability, intelligence and respectability, instead of as demagogues and intriguers. ms ae, Larner, John B.: I belféve Washington is as well governed as any.icity in the Union. Linkins Geo. W.: A restoration /of suffrage would mean a return tet poweriof an ele- ment such as controlted the District in the days of the oldifeather duster” legislature, which can ently be remembered with shame by goodircitizens, and the most of whose enactments, wheh brought to the attention of the rourts,.fsave been declared illegal and annulled. } Loeb, Meyer: The present formidf govern- ment is entirely satisfactory, and I don’t think it could be imptoved upén by any other, especially of the kind wejhave had before. J a Morcoe, E. R.: The elective ‘fran¢hise door has been closed for some years in the District. Up to the present time our municipal affairs have been in clean hands. Let's leave well enough alone. Mattingly, Wm. F.: Our experience with suffrage and that of other cities shows that it is not a good or wise plan for municipal government. It is a mere mat- ter of sentiment. I am in favor of closer relations with the United States, and would prefer that the District govern- ment should be made a branch of one of the executive departments of the United States government. x Macfarland, Henry B. F.: Washington has the best municipal government in the United States, although it can be im- proved notably by substituting one Com- missioner for the three. McCalmont, John S.: In the abstract suf- frage is the logical result of our princi- ples, but the application of it to the Dis- trict is more than doubtful. If present law Is defective, point out defects and have them remedied. I would favor a responsible head—a governor—who would supervise and execute the orders of the Commissioners. Mann, B. Pickman: I believe the vicious elements of society tend to congregate in cities, and that the moral tone of cities is always below that of the state at large. I would, therefore, favor control of all large cities by state commissions. This would not exclude voting by citi- zens for general state officers in states. But the District of Columbia, being a government reservation, its residents should have no more voice in its affairs than any other United States citizens. Mayer, Theodore J.: The District of Co- lumbia is by far better governed at pres- ent than it ever was when suffrage ex- isted. Mayse, Wm., jr.: Washington is now the best governed city in the United States. Moore, Frederic L.: It will be time enough to think of suffrage when we have re- covered from the effects of our last ex- periment in this direction. ‘ Mitchell, J. H.: The present form of gov- ernment for local affairs is the best we ever had, and has proved to be such for the best interest of the people. Moore, Thos. P.: If suffrage were restored taxes would be much higher. Citizens who live on line dividing would exercise the franchise to our detriment. The pop- ulation is too changeable and their inter- ests different. Let well enough alone. Meyers, J. C.: 1 oppose a restoration of suf- frage to the District of Columbia because the District is composed of a floating population, having no Iccal interest, and, together with a certain element lacking discriminating pcwers, would necessarily affect the vote of those having the best interests of the District at heart. Miles, Henry R.: Having been a witness to the abuses of suffrage in this city years ago, I have no desire to make it possible to suffer from it again. Marble, E. M.: I think the present form of government in the District of Columbia the best that could be devised under the circumstances; far better than was or could be secured by general suffrage. Meads, Charles C.: I am not yet quite pre- pared for supremacy in the Dis- trict of Colifbia. Murtagh, Wm. J. I am in favor of suf- frage as a principle; but there are im- portant reasons why it should not pre- vail in this District. Miller, Francis: Under existing circum- stances I think universal suffrage would be destruction. McGill, Thos.: I oppose a restoration of suffrage to the District of Columbia, be- Meving that a change to a “suffrage’ government would be detrimental to the best interests of the District. McChesney, A. R.: If Il remember we had suffrage here once, and my impressions are that it was a failure. McArdle, Thomas E.: I have lived in Wash. ington forty years, and have seen vari- ous kinds of municipal government in vogue. The present method is the best. McKee, David R.: Experience has demon- strated that the exercise of suffrage in this District was unproductive of good to the people, and that in some respects it was positively harmful. We have be- come the most prosperous community in the United States, and have seen Wash- ington transformed into the most beauti- ful city of the world under the existing system of government. It has not yet been shown how either rich or poor would or could be benefited by a return to the suffrage system. Therefore, why not “let well enough alone?” McGill, J. Nota: I oppose a restoration of suffrage. Suffrage, however, is prefer- able to non-resident Commissioners. Com- missioners should be identified with the city. Mueller,Geo. J.: If you get rid of the 90,000 negroes residing in this city I am in favor of suffrage. As long as they are here I am opposed to it. Moses. W. H.: Suffrage here would create a strong argument in favor of abolishing the 50 per cent clause in the act, where Congress has said the government shall pay one-hal of our city’s expenses, or words to that effect. Macnichol, C.: Suffrage ought to be de- sirable in the District of Columbia, but past experience and present conditions make it a doubtful experiment. Milburn, Jno. A.: I opposed suffrage in the District of Columbia and continue to do so. Morgan, James D.: Our government is the cleanest and most practicable in the country. My sole objection is, we pay more into the United States treasury than we get in return by appropriations. Manning, J. F.: Our present form of gov- ernment is the best, as it is free of chances of fraud. With our board of trade our representation is all that can be desired and serves the entire interest of the District best. Magruder, John H.: Let well enough alone. McGuire, F. B.: I oppose a restoration of suffrage, believing we have the best pos- sible form of government for the District. McElroy, A. P.: I believe suffrage would be detrimental to business interests, prop- erty interests and to the welfare of our good city in general. I hope it will be many years before our form of govern- ment is changed. McDowell, S. C.: We have a clean, fairly economical city goverrment. Why ex- change, with every chance in favor of getting such as New York, Philadelphia and, indeed, almost every city in the Union now has? McCaffrey, T.: I lived here under the hood- lum government we were relieved of. We suffered enough under that misrule, and I know there is no honest citizen who has the welfare of the city at heart who wants a return of that law. Noble, H. B.: Municipal authority is bet- ter rested in a few responsible persons. The unscrupulous and vicious generally control the ballot. I speak from experi- ence as an old resident. O’Ferrall, Patrick: The United States should have a place to transact national business. Congress should make the law for this District. The national capital is the Saint Peter’s of the American citizen and the representatives should not be incumbered by or hindered by local poli- ticlans or statesmen. Those who want to vote can move into Maryland or Vir- ginia. Uncle Sam should have this Dis- trict absolutely under his control. Offutt, H. W.: Let well enough alone. Obold, Charles M.: I am opposed to a resto- ration of suffrage for the reason we had it once since I have been a resident of the city, and we fare better as it is now. Oyster, Jas. F.:Very well satisfied with the present form of government. Orme, James W.: It gives me much pleasure to have the opportunity to vote opposing suffrage in the District of Columbia. Perry, R. Ross: In matters of municipal concern I consider universal suffrage a most ursafe guide. Pairo, R. E.: There are some arguments in favor of suffrage here, but personally, perhaps from selfish reasons, I oppose it. If the Commissioners would pay more attention to the rights of the masses in the matter of encouraging cheap homes and living there would be less agitation of this suffrage question. If I were a very poor man or a laboring man I should certainly favor suffrage; as it is I do not. Pyles, Geo. F.:_I do not favor a restoration of suffrage. The peace and quietness we have now would be so disturbed by suf- frage, the benefits gained would be more than offset by the political disturbances brought about by office-seeking politicians. Parker, Myron M.: I believe the present form of government the best we have ever had, and well suited to our partnership relations with the general government. Pitzer, A. W.: We tried suffrage—it proved a failure. We have good government now —perhaps the best in the United States. The District is represented in Congress in the committees on the District of Co- lumbia. The District has the largest share of offices in the departments; one- half of our expenses are paid by United States. Let well enough alone. No feather dusters. Peixotto, Daniel L. M.: From conversations with some of the older residents of the District I am led to believe that a res- toration to suffrage would be very un- wise. I have not looked thoroughly into the subject, but believe that our present form of government is all right, provided we have better representation. Pilling, J. W.: I should consider the restor- ation of suffrage the greatest affliction that could happen to the District, and it passes my comprehension how any citizen of sane’mind can think otherwise. No labor or sacrifice on my part would be too great to assist in the prevention of such a calamity. The reasons are too obvious to admit of stating, even if the limited space permitted. Pilling, Fred W.: I think we have the best governed city in the country; devoid of rings and party strife. I would very much regret returning to the old regime. Parris, Albion K.: I oppose a restoration ~ of suffrage, and should think that any citizen who experienced that expensive pleasure here in past years would oppose. Phillips, R. A.: The people of Washington had better let “well enough” alone. A better governed city cannot. be found on the earth! We feel sure that every dollar of the revenues of the city is honestly and judiciously expended. Being the seat of government of this great nation it is wisely provided that it shall be under the control and government of the national legislature. Pearson, Chas. B.: The present form of government could be better, but suffrage would be much worse. + Prince, George: I should regret exceedingly to see the scenes of a few years ago when we had suffrage repeated. Pullman, E. J.: We now have a better gov- ernment than any city I can name, and at a minimum expense. Suffrage would bring corrupt rings, extra expense, etc.; and ignorance, led by tricky schemers, would outvote our intelligent citizens. ‘We have had a “feather duster legisla- ture.”” Peelle, Stanton J.: The oojections are ob- vious. The lamp of the past should guide us_ in the future. The objections when suffrage was in force still hold good. Hold to the protection of Congress. Pursell, C. C.: The experience of suffrage here in past years is sufficient warning of the dangers from it now, when it is almost certain that there will be no im- provement in the conditions surrounding it. All the agitation of the subject has not increased the demand from the best portion of the community. Prentiss, C. A.: The evils and troubles accompanying the elections years ago are too fresh in the memory. Parker, John C.: My opinion is that the present form of government for the Dis- trict of Columbia is the best that can be had under the circumstances that sur- round us. Quaiffe, Alfred R.: Too many ignorant col- oa People in Washington ambitious to rule. Randle, A. E.: Washington is the best gov- erned city in the world. The late John Jay Knex once said: “New York would be the finest city in the world if governed by Americans,” and I will add: Washing- ton with suffrage with the negro holding the balance of power would be the worst governed capital on earth. Ramsburg, C. S.: Although I favor abstract- ly a republican form of government, there are so many collateral considera- tions that enter into the question in the District of Columbia that if I were called upon now to give the decisive vote it would be in the negative. Roose, Wm. S.: After living in the Dis- trict thirty-four years, under all forms of government, I am pesitive the present form is the best. Rauterberg, L. E.: I oppose a restoration = suffrage. We had quite enough of the farce. Raub, Samuel C.: The feather duster legis- lature broke the camel's back. The pres- ent form of government I believe to be the best in this country, and, all things considered, the most economical. Robinson, C, Barnwell: I oppose a restora- tion of suffrage, and am opposed to any but residents of the District being ap- pointed to hold office under the District government. Rock, Jas. W.: I think we had enough of home rule some years ago (under the “Bowen” regime). Riggs, E. Francis: Freedom from corrup- tion and the absence of the disgraceful evils of “ward politics’—universal in other American municipalities—are bless- ings which this community enjoys solely from the present system of government, in my judgment. Robinson, Bushrod: I consider the present form of governinent the best the District ever Lad. Stockstill, D. W.,-and Snyder, Cyrus: This is the best governed city in the United States. When the people had suffrage it was the worst. Let well enough alone. Studer, N.: I oppose suffrage in the Dis- trict of Columbia on account of political rings and trickery and non-political free- sore of thought or political education of e- masses. Stanford, C. E.: I would not vote; had enough of the old system. Spear, Ellis: We appear to be doing rea- sonably well in the District without suf- frage. We might do worse with it. I be- lieve we should. The experiment in other cities is not encouraging. I am content to let the general government run the affairs of the District. Shafer, C. B.: As citizens we would gain trouble by restoring suffrage, and lose one of the chief attractions of our city— its mental restfulness. Stellwagen, Edward J.: The present gov- ernment is intelligent, non-partisan and monese: What more could be asked or de- = : Schmidt, Fred A.: In my opinion our gov- ernment is as cleanly managed as possi- ble, and thus best serves the interests of the inhabitants. Stevens, O. A.: The present form of “ trict government” is considered a1 vance step” to that of “suffrage,” for- merly exercised by the citizens of the city; and I would go forward on this line to the extent of its being governed and known as that of the “Department of the District of Columbia,” consolidat- ed in one building, giving it cabinet rep- resentation, with its chiefs of bureaus detailed from the several departments of the general government. Shellabarger, Sam’!: I would be in favor of suffrage here were it possible under our present Constitution to bestow real gov- ernment on the people here; but since that is not possible, and it must be left in Congress, I care not for the shadow and sham, which is all the Constitution ——- to be bestowed on the people ere. Sheldon, Geo. T.: I am of the opinion that the ignorant and vicious, whose votes could be purchased for a glass of whis- ky, would rule the District. Sands, F. P. B.: With an enlightened press honestly guarding the welfare of the pub- lic, our three Commissioners can be made to know what the interests of the people demand of them, and they will Possibly attend to them. Certainly a change to suffrage would be disastrous to our best interests. Speare, W. R.: The affairs of the District are in good hands and managed satis- factorily to the majority of the citizens, so let well enough alone. Stead, Robert: I am entirely satisfied with the present form of government, and do not think it can be greatly improved upon—certain'y not by restoring suffrage to the citizens of the District of Colum- ia. Small, John H.: The present system is good enough, provided we have good, broad- minded men at the helm. Stewart, Henry C., jr.: I bitterly oppose a restoration of suffrage. “A burnt child dreads the fire.” Somerville, Thos.: I believe we have the best and cheapest, also the most thor- ough and efficient local government in the country, with all the necessary safe- guards for good government. No more feather duster legislators for me. Selden, John: I am utterly opposed to a restoration of suffrage because the ad- ministration of our local affairs should continue to be conducted with intelli- gence and economy. Stahl, Thos. B.: I think our city is better governed than any other city where they have suffrage and corruption and excite- ment at the polls. -Stake, James E.: I think our city is better provided for under its present form of government than to have suffrage. Shea, Nicholas H.: If suffrage were re- stored, I am of opinion that Congress would not take the same interest in our affairs that they have done since they gave us the present form of government. Yet, as the capital of the nation, we should have our needs attended to better than they have been. Seitz, Jno. F.: I think that our form of government as now ruled by Commis- sioners is the best form for the entire peo- ple, particularly for property owners. Spicer, O. O.: I believe there is less fric- tion and less expense attached to admin- istering the affairs of the District as now, than if we had annual elections for the District offices. Saum, J. F.: The District of Columbia in its position to the United States is that of a “neutral zone.” Laws are enacted by representatives from all the states, and this function is not likely to be sur- rendered in the least iota, nor should it be, so long as the District is the seat of government. Suffrage has been tried here and “found wanting.” Smith, Rich’d: Experience teaches us that government. by the general government is the best’ government for the seat of government. Strasburger, Z.: We have had a demonstra- tion of both forms of government, und the present is unquestionably the better for the people in general. Under the present system we have a high standard ef government officials. Toner, J. M.: If evils attend the present methods of city government, greater ones would attend a government of suffrage. We are at present free from class, race and party spirit and vilification and ran- cor. I hope we will continue to be gov- erned as at present. Truell, Edwin M.: A comparison of re- sults of the two systems as heretofore in operation is sufficient to prove the ad- vantages of the present form of govern- ment. It is not probable that conditions have changed enough as yet to make a return to the old form of government desirable. Towner, T. B.: Under existing circum- stances I am satisfied that our present form of government is better than any we could obtain by the restoration of suf- frage. Towles, G. B.: The present form of govern- ment is the best that has ever been es- tablished here. Of all the evils of such suffrage as we have had in times past here, “the good Lord deliver us.” Thompson, J. Ford: I think the restora- tion of suffrage to the District would be disastrous to the future of Washington. Taylor, J. D.: It would be better for the city and better for the country to let the status be and remain as it is. Tappan, M. A.: I do not advocate a restor- ation of suffrage. 1 was familiar with its. workings when under the old regime. Let well enough alone. We are happy now, even if we have passed through two years of “reform government,” there- fore, do not want to plunge into others we know not of. Veerhoff, W. H.: By asking for suffrage, we will have to expect the withdrawal of the support of the United States gov- ernment; this would force the care of all the property in the District on the shoul- ders of the individual ow-ers. Watson, C. J.: I believe the present form of government the best in the general in- terest of its citizens. Wimer, J. B.: If I could conceive of good, comprehending the entire community, to result to us from the restoration of suf- frage, I would not so emphatically op- Pose. I say no, let well enough alone. Woodworth, W.'S.: ¥ am opposed to any- thing that tends to ring rule. To restore suffrage here would mean to create an Afro-political oligarchy and commit the interests of the District ‘to incompetent demagogues who might happen to be in power as federal officers. Widdicombe, T. W.: I am opposed te suf- frage, as 1 am saticfied we have the best government on the face of the globe. It sree are only a few who are clamoring for office that desire suffrage. Wight, John B.: To give up a form tigers ernment which has proved itself to be 8o economical and satisfactory for one which has been abundantly proved to be extravagant and vicious, would, in my opinion, be most unwise. Whitaker, A. J.: While the present form of Seer en os not perfect, it is far su- perior to that we had twenty years ago. People of refinement and wealth follow the one and ward “heelers,” “bummers” and political strikers the other. If we must have suffrage let it be, limited. Wood, C. am vupposed to a restoration of suffrage most emphatically. Winslow, Caroline B.: The present form of government in the city of Washington is infinitely superior to the former elective system. Williams, H. W.: By an act concerning the District of Columbia, approved February 27, 1801, Congress assumed complete juris- diction over the District as contemplated by the framers of the Constitution. Let it so remain. And the District is better governed than by party spirit, which has been tried. Wagner, Wm.: Let well enough alone. I am satisfied with present way. Wheeler, R. A.: One reason is that I fear our local government might fali into bad hands as it once did. Another reason, it might alienate national sympathy and assistance. West, Wm. H.: The present government is the best we have ever known and is good. enough for me. Woodward, W_ Redin: I believe that a commission should be appointed, which should have charge of all District ap- propriations, as well as loeal legislation, taking these matters out of Congress, where the District does not now get a fair hearing. Woodward, S. W.: We are now criticised as having the best city government in the United States. I believe our best in- terests demand its continuance. Wimsatt, W. A.: The administration of our affairs is now in the hands of three men appointed on account of their ability to conduct and manage the business of the community in an intelligent and business- like manner. With suffrage we should place our interests in the hands of poli- esas generally ignorant and often cor- rup! Weser, Edward: The present form of goy- ernment svits me. Wilson, Robert: The present form of gov- ernment we have now I prefer. Young, W. P.: If you would make this District a home for owis, bats and coons restore “that inestimable boon to free- men,” the franchise. Property values will ve: pe preserved by letting it severely lon: Those who voted against a restoration of suffrage without making any remarks were: Acker, Geo. N. Kennedy, Geoi Amiss, T. B. Knorr, BAe = Alvord, E. 8. Kubel, Ernest. Aukam, F. G. Liebermann, G. Aukam, G. C. Lansteh. G. Anderson, Chas. P.. Lee, Chas. H. Adams, Sam’! 8. Lincoln, N. S. Addison, J. C. Long, Horace J. Alvey, R. H. Letmate, F. W. Addison, T. G. Lutz, F. A. Austin, O. P. Langley, C. A. AtLee, Goodwin Y. Leading, R. Beall, William H. Boynton, Charles A. Bacon, L. S. Baird, Frank T. N. Lowery, A. H. Lambie, James B. Muth, George F. Moore, O'Brien, Barker, George M. Mitcheil, John. Busey, S. C. Magruder, G. L. Burchell, N. W. Moore, Clarence. Brown, A. C. Mabis, G. M. Brown, Justice H. B. May, Henry. Baumegras, E. C. Barnard, Milton C. Bittinger, H. E. Bowen, James G. Bradbury, R. F. Brady, John B. Monroe, Charles R. Mattingly, C. W. Matthews, H. S. Manogue, Geo. W. Mortis, Robert E. Brooke, Edward. Mackall, Loui Birney, A. A. Morse, S. T. G. Bailey, Charles B. Morri: Wm. C. n, Morgan, William B. McKee, Henry H. McGill, James H. McKnev, Wm. H. Nailor, Allison, jr. Nattans, Arhur. Nutt, Z. 1. Newbold, Charles. Newboid, John L. Perry, Seaton. Petersen, F. Parker, Brown, F. Wilson. Bud@ George T. Bailey, Marcellus. Bogus, George. Compton, James. Cooksey, John. Cain, Richard 8. Cuthbert, M. F. Cahill, James A. Coyle, B. J. Castell, Edward. Chittenden, Geo. B. Cadmus, Eugene. Plant, George H. Callahan, Robert. _ Phillips, S. L. Carpenter, J. F. Philiips, W. Hallett. Caulfield, J. P. Rider, E. P. Criswell, Francis M. Roberson, R. E. Cohen, Robert. Ridout, John. Chapin, Philip E, Ritchie, Louis W. Campbell, W. D. Rover, T. A. Curry, Levi. Rice, M. P. Chambers, D. A. Rau, H, A. Rochester,. Wm. B, Redfern, Joseph. Smith, William H. Speir, W. E. Shafer, Charles A. Shefer, Charles F. Clarke, Henry A. Chapman, James J. Dearing, George T. Dellwig, L. A. Darby, Rezin W. Dashiell, Samuel A. Duvall, N. H. Strasburger, Joseph, Dietz, ‘Charles J. | Sornenschmidt, C, Desio, Gerome. Seebold, F. M. Draney, T. M. Selden, W. tL Dunlop, G. T. Snyder, B. P. Swindells, John A. Sherratt, Samuel. Schneider, C. F. Schneider, J. A. Shute, Samuel M, Emmert, Louis H. Edmonston, C. Eliot, Johnson. Ellerson, James R. Foy, James. Falls, A. J. Shedd, 8. 8. Fox, A. 8. Shedd, John L. Strider, L. C. Green, Bernard R. Gill, William R. Schneider, F. A. Garnett, Henry Wise. Semmes, J. Hall. Griswold, H. A. Schneider, C. Green, Saml. H. Sewall, Frank. Gray, E. N. Seymour, H. A. Gregory, H. R. Spransy, George. Holtzman, R. O. Stone, David D. Hufty, Francis. Stearns, 8. 8. Henderson, Stickell, Josepi. Heiberger, F. J. Smith, Walter H. Hermann, J. Ph. Teel, William 8. Harban, W. S. Truesdell, George. Hartig, Loui: Tappan, W. 8. Hoge, W. 8. Tenney, W. H. Heiskell, Jesse L. ‘Thomas, A. A. Haislett, 8. J. Upton, Wm. B. Hoeke, W. H. Vogt, Frederick. Harris, Edwin. Van Wickle, W. P. Harris, E. Allen. White, Geo. H. B, Heitmuller, Charles. Whelpley, J. W. Hibbs, W. B. Williamson, Irving. Hood, R. H. Wood, F. A. Holmes, E. 8. Whitney, T. M. Hendershott, A. F. Waggaman, Jno. F. Heilprin, 1. Walker, W. T. Henderson, Jas. B. Woodward, eo Hills, Thos O. Whyte, W. M. Heitmuller, Louis C. Hill, William C. James, Charles A. Whittemore, W. C. White, Charles E. Wilmarth, J. G. Johnson, E. L. Willett, J. P. Kelly, Jos. T. Walter, J. Krafft, George S. West, John T. King, A, F. A. York, James M. Klenk, George. Opposed, With Qualifications. Auerbach, Carl: I would be in favor of ‘qualified suffrage, as taxation withor representation is not in keeping with out free institutions. Prefer our present form of District government to the legislature we had in "74. Ashford, M.: I am not in favor of a res- toration of universal suffrage, but I in favor of the election by taxpayers a board of assessors to serve, say three years. Allan, Wm. P.: I oppose a restoration of suffrage to the District of Columbia, exe cept in the case of President. I thin every American citizen should have that privilege. I am content with the presen€