Evening Star Newspaper, November 25, 1874, Page 8

in the indictment to commit this wrong, then be would be guilty, whether that one is on trial or EVE ‘4 ticulars, either of direct facts or circumstances, | his statement. Come along to the night of the | Wan Deranry cer. ENING STAR. | their evi conteadscteor explainn er varies H 234, the acts on that might, and the drelaration ‘Waswiner | _ Any or either of these defendants, together from the evidence of the government. If, in | to Richards to say notuirg, as Alexander had Proms | With any one else ch: in the indictment | any lar, the evidence of the government pot beer aroused. | eBlf states, ge: . | —— : who the evidence satiefics you were engaged in | had cast a suspicion upon the conduct OF sseo- moat bad Alexander to do with the matter, | perature tp the interior, amd light valns wane = — eee ® conspiracy to ruin Alexander, or to bring @ | tionof either defen or defendants, which, and why was his name mentioned eastern guif and sovth atlantic coast, with WEDNESDAY..November 2551874 | false charge against him of being con in conld, or it to, explain, and the acked if Columbus lived there; and why did owe | northwest winés and rlowly rising . es & barglary, would be guilty. It would be false —— of the Rragocs anexpiined that con- or i Spec . at Le geod Les cy nee rw Bog! ry and middie sistes gene. D ued first page.) to say that he had been instrumental in pro- | duct and association u then so to determine what clos ag | rafly clear and ¢ westerly, wit es | curing a burglary if you find from theevideace | facas trac duteuity alom heve sonal means | Harta bog hye aie Affair. The closing wax the arrest of Ben~ | wi Darometer during the ground that confession is better for society. | that was the intention and purpose of relieved of tt. Further than that, if such sus- | re ton op ——— =— OF 2m April after the | For And goversment bas always exercised the | twoof the persons,or more than two, char, jeion had been created, and after z nights exp tote o! a3. Ke |e temperature power of relieving those who will undertake to fix upa matter by which it would be made e evidence of both the government and the | o: ast 7d from Richards’ testimon: | Portherly wines during the day, and rier to ‘eli the whole matter. This rule bas ite min | toappear that Alexender was concerned in it, | detense, a reasonable doubt exists in your mind | wld by any Ome accused to let the lowed Dy fel'in, barometer. | For au the family government. You see in the family en he really was not. To solve this matter | which way the evidence preponderates, the la— ty rest, Or sky nothing about it, as Alexander was | iske region and the northwest d three or four or seven brothers; sometimes sis- | in this connection, you must look to the testi- | requires you to give to the defendant or frend lings apply, if they shouid be found on the | witness for the government? Was there evidence | pot reached, or whatever you find was salt, | mess, south or west win? ae — ter, and some of them combine to do that which | mony of Richards, and to all the testimony, to guts in whose favor the doubt exists the benefit | guilty view to bina, or apply to, more thanons {| indepemient of his own disclosures before the | then you must connect = ith the parties. If | P:ratare, and falling remene, awl th — 4s wrong in itself and violation of positive law | come to a conclusion from that evident: | cuereor. charged in the indictment, if 708 find the facts { committee, and in this case to have connected | you find a coppedtion, and ascertal | Se emow Reeth and «oer ef Mimeat Por of the household. Punishment mast follow, | whether two or more of them intended by what This rule you wil! apply to the tele, is. If, | to connect any two of those charged. bim with the safe? What evidence is there that | evidence whether it was” | the lower lake rr io. oe a an provided the 2 can be found and trath | they did to attempt to ruin Alexander or to de- | however, the explanations attem| by the de. There are stfli some inquiries arising out of | any one, except some of the porties in this case, | tion in the matter tha: was Sought either in ths | tinne below ff ee ———_ Premise ascertained. The judge and juror—father and ter. fence should not be satisfactory, then you will | the course of the evidence fur you to make,and | even if ‘there is evidence that any of tho Deginuing or as the matter progressed; and | er. areas of anc oh og aS mete » and some One Or the other will con- As the evidence from day to day developed | cok to all the evidence together to see it you | instructions te Cag ag of the law applicable of any participation of bis inthesafe | whether any of these parties, or avy two of | slight chang ra or weet and fess and tell ail. So in schools, colleges and | facts, ‘snd as those facts may prove guilt er fail | find enough init to connect either one or more | to that evidence. It is contended by the de- less it be from his own disclosures? charges im the indictment were conneciad of eee rdice theta? Batare, and the law | to establish it, eo you aro to render a verdiet. | of the partice charged inthe indictment with | fence thet they have direct!y contradicted | D idence, ail taken together, show | with the faise (mstication of Alexander If | tinued’ +m York, Lys pe adopts Ms rales thereto. ‘What meant the preparations made for the re- | the supposed eafe robbery, in view of bringing | come material statements male by Hayes, or | that he could, or he and Zirrath eoald have | you find this to be therase Fou must pronoanes | Aurir | Pea rrea rine and will fell decideaty Notwithstanding this rule, safeguard “| ception of Bentonand Williams, alias Bliss, at | a falee charge againet Alexander, of being con: | that they have shown by other witnesses astate | worked up the eafe matter together with Ben | Lote you tad te bare beenes on € Feed sos } 4 Wednestay night ; a around the citizen aczased OD ‘Le in- | the office on the night of the 2340f April. Was | nected therewith. Are these tel con, | of facts which, if true, then what Hayee has | ton and Williams—aud Benton isnot here ami | — It bas bern said by ccfemce during sas prov Amusements, ac, Te-ntgnt. cry and bran = *T_more who | it part and parcel of some sistent with the connection of the parties to | ssid in that connection cannot be tras. Tas hd confess by requiring more ria‘, ® tia", proof to sastain the witness than in C8*3 where the witnesses lied to the offence. lan or plans viously formed to do a Gale and Ryetetous deed, so complicated and difficult of solution, as would lead to false suspicions, to false accusa- whom they relate,with some other matters than the safe business, which other matter has been shown to your satisfaction to have been in ex- law on that branch of you are to be satisfied, from the evi Statements, or the statements of which witnesses yur investigation is that nee, which ] Williams esesped that night of 224 or morn- ing of 24th Spc. Hayes, Benton and Williams with the monoy to Who furnished Zirrach, Tee# of this trial that sithough the government Eat entered = diemieral of the prosec I against Hayes and Zirruth. it might st! tt Ford's Cpera How —Mrs. ¥. RB. Conway tn | the beautifal pay o - jancarty.” cf Nateonai Tiearr : pay their expenses here or to Canada, or the em to account. ‘ ent rule obtains when it is sought to ws, that the real ‘petrators would esca ieterce at the same time, and to which fney are true. fi Europe, started upon by Zirrath, It is admitted in the argument of my . ater company an prove & charge by the testimony of one on ore en it to entrap ‘ee uweary Bentou and Wiis wight, according to the evidence, be applied’ BENTON, RAYES, AND OTHERS, ag Ate, Seles Hayes was in Canada? You | defence that Hayes told the trum, ta mend Theater Comic Who aided jn the Commi-sion of the offence, and | liams, otherwise called Miles or Bliss, or were Or, if you are aalistied that some other matter You are to tind the facts in connectton with | are totind the facts. Hayes says he was there. | to who were engaged ip the oor it oy, That #, | SP other attrsetions, where the same charge is supported by the evi- | they real and true, burglars and safe robbers? | was being looked a] by the ma- | Benton and any of the parties +, thietrana- | Newcombe says he sawh!m there. He @ 0 says hey admit that he told the tut, otlen be wait Ts. dc. — Bakers’ Renewstent Society, Ma. Genes of thore not parties thereto. This you are to find out from the evidence. chinery of the detective force, and there is @ | actin, You must bot lose “gut of the fact Whitley sent him there to see Haves. ends that none of them Wer engay iat “ici. tor you | ri Hall; Masquerade, Damon Conc)sve, An accomplice comes before the court with a You are to connect the evidence of what oc- | reasonable doubt whether to apply them to the vpon which all agree an“ abont which thare is ship was also near, and in correspondence. Who | to judge the facts, ~ } 1. 8 PK. 004 Fellows’ Mall, Navy Fant: mark which the law recognizes at once asastain, | curred on the night of the 23d of April with the | one or to the other, the law requires a toap- | no controversy, that ¥; :nton isthe man who was | turnihed Hayes and Zirrath with moner? Ba far Re the law i to be declared to yoo, | LO.0.F, Leree ar O44 Fellows’ Mall, Th throwing a suspicion on the evidence to the | evidence of the visit of any of the persons im- | ply them for the benefit of the defendont or | falumed to Alexauder’s house with the bundle, | Whore instraments were thes? Did Hayes gai | your cath i toteke it trom mer act 1 charg- | for the benett of rhe linrary. jery. The judge must hand such a witness to | plicated to the «fice previous to that night defendants. But that reasonable doubt must | snd who was Szrested, keptin jail from the 4h | any money from Nettleship at Newark? Dd | \ou that if be has “ot told the wh “le truth. the jory with the admonition to beware of his | gether with the visit of any of them to Alexa: arise out of all the evidence on the subject or | oi April uuti: testimony; act with caution in considering the Btatement- ma@lc by such an one. der's house, whether from the evidence this w: | to leave the way for identification, together subjects connected with the telegrams. Gentlemen, if the testimony of Hayes and the 22d of August, three days be- fore the grand jury wasto meet ant the coart Zirruth aud bis wife get avy money from any Ol the secret service agents who were up der the he truth when b> that the ccfence Paying acmitted that he cola ¢ exculpated them, you are t> Aumrenie | fo Feasemble, was then, on Saturday, late in | control and direction of Whitley and Neiticship | determine whriher be toils enoagh teath now | Rouse, Mee. F. BR. Fhe government slwaye undertakes that the | with the imprisonment of Benton, the e-cape of | Zirruth ie found by yon to fail-according to the the das, takon from prison, bailed, aud you are | acd furniched by them with mance for ther | Scat heim 6 defendants, or aa many of thoes | ud the same at the Sridence of an secomplice shall be sapported by | Williams altas Bliss, the final bailingof Benton, | rules of law 1 give you, then would there | to tind from the facts whettier any of the parties | purpore These facts you ate t arc f & his exkience relates to; and 1 charge you | anc the rules, which the laws of that government | the circumstances under which he was turne: fcarcely be avy explanation of confederacy aut- | on trial bad any connection therewith, and for | altthe evidence. How dues the character of bet that the government having relieved | National Theater.“ Monsiear require. Aud these ru‘es demand that a ver- | out of jail—whether from the evidence that was | ficient to cony: Sige cgi conspiracy, what- | what purpose tho matter took place—and then | the witnesse= Drought to +mpeach Hayes com- that power is by rales of law boanl in | A} DOMse,” and tho Same tm the evening. ict cannot be badon the evidence of such a | @ part of the original understanding in the | ever misconduct might otherwise arise out of | you must ascertain from the facts what rotation pare, according to yout Qheervation of them on justice und geod faith to protect hum i Reevlar¢ z performance at th Theater witness unless other witvesses directly support | combination, if you find a combination—whe- | the evidence. ‘Ubis bad to the allegations in the indictment of | the stand, with Hayes bimeeit? The most of Ard slong as I sit here | Comtqne—"The Bence Death” aod vanety Lis or :elate euch facts and circumstances a8 | ther Harrington, Williams, Nettiuship, Haves, Witnesses have been introduced who stated 8 conspiracy, holding only the parties therein | them stated that they had been, or were now, flaw | potforman ¢ oe hes =. by the Loraine polling Berton. the alias Williams or Will am on | that the reputatiun of Hayes and Zirruth tor | cor cern: d responsible for the act wntess you also | on the police force, elther of the United States ~ tent with untainted eviden Pp cons duce on the mind a conviction, beyond a rea- sonabie-doubt, that the truth cams from the lips of the suspected witness. When the gov- ernment bas done this it has wiped out and aiiss Bliss, Zirruth knew of all this; whether they were sided by two or more char; in the indictment either by their direct acts or their assent; whether Whitley was connected there- with, fooking back totheevidence of his an- truth and veracity was bad. Some knew them better chan others. All those for the defenss stated that, as far their knowledge of their character sud reputation for truth went, that find this to be one of the acts in this drama look- ing to the general plan of conspiracy and ercape from the ec nsequences thereof, andtken UL ac itcould be visited only onthe parties who the 7, aN or the city of New York. One of them said that imangngaged him to work ap Zirrath’s char- that captain said that he bad o ten- e trath cow! REASONARL# DOUDT. Your attention be em called daring t rt at the Poor esged him. You are to judge between them and ‘aud these inet is wt Termtation was bad. evidence has shown to have been guilty ofthe | give such weight and construction to thelr tes- t. You have been Washed away the mark that was on the wituess | thority to Nettleship. All this you are to de- Tou saw these witnesses upon the stand, and | general conspiracy. tmeny as that testimony deserves. Of all this reasonable doubt exists upon any quee- Baden Gret placed before the jary. | It is for you, | termine from the exidence. and if you find a | they told you their occupation. You must de- | ®°petel< Counection you aro to ascertain why | eviderice you are to determine, aud you are to | oe arising in the case, the defendantsor ott gentlemen, to say whether tis hse beendoue | combination to have existed among all or any ine trom all they eaid and all you saw of | Hayes was arrested, by whom he was armeted, | conclude trom all the evidence whether the of them—in whose favor that doubt ext-ts-areor ssiouore to erect two iu the instances of Zirruth and Hayes. If you | of them, two or more, tben your verdict will be {hem what actuated and prompted themintheir | or by whom the warrant had been procured. government has proceeded agalust the partics | is entitled to the benetit th This doubt | lsmp portson the corner of 2st aud E stress find the fact to be that they have told to you | guilty as to those you so find against. If you | testimony. Whether they contradicted each | You are to determine what the fact are, and | Whosre guilty of thie distarhence of the public | most arise from the evi: Zecow oat "| Dorthwest, the tales which are consistent with facts aud | fail to find the facts to connect either ons with | other or not, or whether ey knew the general | from these facts deduce what the reasonable quiet or sgatnet any two of theta. Of the cu ‘The Go operative Porchasing Association ad- Gircumetances detailed by witnesses about | another, or either one with all,or all togethar, | character of Hayes and Zirrath or not. You | Inference is why he was held and Benton re- You are to look to the evidence to determine | Srcr putting all ti together, that | yertiee in today’s Stam a public moeting for Whom there are no suspicions. then they are | or one or more with one or more in the | sre to determine from all that the witnesses | leased. Hayes says that Harrington swore out | what Newcomb’s visit to Cansda meant. Wait- | sour minds sre still lef in joubt fromthe prov- | Friday night, sn¢ tt may pay housekecpere who entitied to your confidence. In ascertaining | indictment, you will give @ verdictof not guilty | said and all that you saw of them whether they | the werrant for bis arrest. The defence hae ley sent him there to see Hayes. They had Ditities Of human testimony and human taue- | Want their supplies at the cheapest rates, to this you are fo cousider thelr entire conduct, | as to that one or more, or all. All reasonabie | appear before you co su ported and sustained | shown by one or two detective officers that | previously procured from hima paper which actions—whether the defendants are guilty or | drop tp. the ‘accuracy and = of thelr state- | doubts on saz vole are to be given for the d2- | asthat yeu will believe them and believe noth- | Hayes expressed surprise that he shoald pursue SS been called an affidavit, and he was asked | pot or whether citer ot them is guilty incon- | The unp of Mr. ZT. Rherbach and Miss tents, the meaesof thelr knowledge, the con fendant to whom such doubt arises in the mind. ing Hivyes and Zirruth have said which is | him, as he had done iarrington no hari. The | in Canada for another. They sayin the de- nection with any one charged tr indi-tment. Lf | Charlotte Stura were solemnlrad last event ng nection snd reasonableness of their story, and if you come to the conclusion from all the | material. It is for on ae credit to which- | weight of this evidence you are to judge of. fence that you are not to believe Hayst. Yet | the evidence when taken togetier leaves no | at the Church of the Augsburg Os the finces of what they said to the facts aud | facts in this case that everything you may find | ever ‘witness you berieve to have told the truth. which you have heard in | you are to determine from the evidence whether cirenmetancee ot what others testified to. to be proved may stili leave a reasonable pre- In this connection you are to look to the tes- Are all the shings resonable doubt on your micas of gu! = — v. Dr. Brandt, in the prosence of & numerous trien te. t evidence during this trial so many ingenutties | they, the parties here or any of them, procared 1 By gull” 0 th a} Sescmblage of relatives and te deen eee caar de eltolige che Suna. | *umption that either one or all of the parties ix | ume my of the witnesses brought forward to sus- | fo deceive and fo entams the unweary and lead | his aflduvit to endeavor to tees thonuselres, wet ee peoridh toee Emp rb ge My Probabilities, | The eereiter peculiar to that charek were men, tion is s powerful means of eliciting the truth. | or are innocent, give the defendant or defend- | tair, their character for thewruth, Apply the | the innocent to ruin’ or ate they a combination | whether they were willing to ase his«tatemionts Bot pomibilitice. You cannot properly deter. | formed th an i After the Pe Soes Tee of tnree, witnesses did they sustain | gute im whose cage that presumption existe the | sae test to them which I have instructed you | or plots caversee nnd arrangements forthe par- | to be believed by others. Vou are to judge | nin! teat wecitiyy mdants ate, oreither | Aolmmizction of the merringe site tin Pe ARS CEES pia nation? Did | yenemtt thereof. And remember your duty on | Vyapply to the impeaching witueses. Deter- petration of vilialpy and wrong, abhored and | whether he told the facts there, or lias ba told ey confess the tri 1d ey eving disposition to Keep back any thing,to conceal, te hide, to evade, to avoid, to to travel outof the other side—that if such presumption cannot be indulged tn from the facts proved, the de- fendant or defendants must take the conse- “niine from their evidence how long they have known them, and whether they were in a sitaa- tion to know what character they bore. The erounced by all law, and which require the thorough investigation which can nione be given by the deliberate proceedings in @ court—pre- them in his evidence before yo sent him to Canad: Netth a. Who first or either 1 rational co: Did re ui of them is, not guilty—nur chat possi ly all are ty. You m st say whats the 100 guess | procesced residence of the bride's | Parents, Mr. and Mrs. Fredertck Stutz, corner 0” 13th and © «tre 5 to whieh the evidence where namerons felteita- did Whitley; or did Nettleehip act with author- | fringe sour mince | tons were pro he 2 aang od path or broad way of truth? quences. law will Spigot to the evidence of the wit- | sumed by law to be a tribunal of justice. ity from Whitiey? And did all this action have If thi waht ad ie, enter kor | partaking of retr From Mouteridio. afamonsresortforspecnta | “ You must determine from the evidence | nesses, neighbors of an impeached one who | Thcedatn nt thie case discloses wrong and | any connection with the eafe burglary and oe eanaeeanis Souyt erat, ing o { tors who go to South America—and if there is ® | whether the release of Benton was out of the | have kuown bim for some time, and had basi- spot where New York specniators do not go rt beadquarters to the scenes of ku kiux from New York to B y tell consi~ ds like the treath when se never Reard of it—to Toronto, from | usual mode of action, and for what purpose ¥< | was effected. If you find from th that the conduct and charge of the whol representation of the government upon him- self and consent and agree to the release of nese transactions with him, whey they say that they never heard any ill of'him, if the jary be- lieve those witnesses. The witnesses “brought to assail that character. Should you find frow the evidence that the character is about where criminality somewhere, by and with aud among and amongst soma human beings, Have you betore you on trial one or more indicted who lieve or to disbelie’ Heyes and Zirruth. Zi m the confecsions of charge in the indictment? prove to your minds, beyon? % reasonable doubt, that Whitley acted in bad faith in haunt judge trom human transa. evidence and gather the sound from ¢ Does this evider concerned, by & ions how to ail the evidence, ew you to solve that doubt yrute of law req so far as your of not guilty. Peoe: ‘Whe rae bh have been ascertained to exist among arty congratylat present, the 9pm. t ain on next y. J bridal tour north and west. jresntincmon from the evidence you are satietied beyond @ | ing up Hayes, o does it show that he was trying | intended to shield the inmocent from wrong, | rae Carers ow THANKeGiviNO Day.—! imore and to Washington; from | ter of what bas been denominated the “eafo | to rustain Haye and Zirruth are open to Im- | reasonabie douct was or were participants in togetat the fasts tw deteranen Sf Nottleship of | 8nd to ier be from the © | Widdows will \e following programme to Bleeker; from the street car to | burglary” had been surrendered out of the | peachment if they are not of character | anyof the mattere ag charged in the indictment &uy Of the eccret service employes were in- comm ah erg ie prs | somee using cles, | sorrow, ims: Ay etter the street ferry. And Jersey City and | pands of the general attorney fot the Wulted | themeelves. They gave you their ocenpations And if so eutistied, then does that evidence sat- | yolved? At this time it is certain that Whitle ensears beara ee te rath. Cot ead | ves: Ohan Capitol Hill to F and 9:h; from | States into the control and direction of a spe- | and places of business, and yon are to jadge isfy you beyond a reasonable doubt who of the | was willing to use Hayes as @ witnors to exoule apg tnamapning Sa cale een) Nat ROIRW GHOST Stee Sharene we Dic saloon; from 6thestreet depo! | cisily appointed attorney of the government, | from all that I have told you whether to balieve partles charged are gi | pate, a8 the government 12 now willing to ang | (hat bumpan tribunals cannot penetrate my | and Mrs. Fre »t, You'll Remeber Me, ard’s and Owen BH. ; from 9:h to T. | and that during the existence of thie special | them or not. pon two persons Who have confessed sin to exculpate. I must charge you that lus i - exist unle mee mysteries cau be | poe, oam’t I Dwelt in Marble 4 to E, and tw Jusic Syasre, and | gppointment and the suspension of gen- ‘These are the rules to govern you in estimat- 10 controversy tha: two otber persons, Benton | law, from all the evidence, wil! view Haves us | S0lved by testimony consistent vith human ren, Tannhauser; I Love the the District Attorney's offica, 2 | efal, powers, Harrington—who bad ‘scr- | ing whether Hayes and Zirrutti are snstulved | and Willams atlas Buse, were Concerned & most important medinm of arriving a: the | Som. end chat reason based on tho ordinary af- | yore? *0 Fair, from Martha, smination of the safe;the visitte Alexander's j rendered bis direction—did, without the | im thelr character for truth by the eame quan- opening of {Ue safe. facts and truth in thiscese, leaving it to you to | ‘Ts Of ren, or inaccor 6 with transactions | walk on 14 Fotks at Home; We'll 2 authority of the substitute, take the | tityof evidence as that which has been use? You are at liberty by the rules ef | - | Lis 2 be Gay sno Happy; Home, Sweet Home. ath says that ke aba: sound. He bas evidently played a re CoRMINe UP. ase a MR S, Harry 5 hes bisser- Benton on bail—aithough that buil might have | it was before any evidence wasintroduced on | doned the combination belore it was so antypart in these trareactions. He was m. Gentlemen of the Jury, I have come tothe | Quatasne a Agen ‘amstances Of the case | becn sufficient to have procurcd his regalar re- | that branch of the subject directly, then you cally determined what shou'é be do: the object of a special visit by aravsrenger sent | Conclusion Of my cuties is F850 | dents cloaks. nery Gepactment is © fizcumstances arise out of the evi- | jease—you will connect this with the antecedent | return to other branches of the cubject’ of government says, therefore, that he is not an | to Canada by Whitiey; be obtained an endien band over to your oor Sanpete avery « t If there i po reaswaable doubt iu your | gets of the affair to ascertain that it all means. | belief in their statements. You may tiud from | accomplice to the full extent that will rend-r | trom ettleship at & time when tow persons | Wich, by the laws of the touth of what they say, then you | Look to the testimony of Judges Wylie and | the evidence that some persons or a good many, | itis tec ony subject to the Coubts and suspi- | would have beenatmntted; he saw Harrington | @muly charged with. “Ye ° : K to their evidence tw ascertain What | Olin, of the astistant clerk Meigs, and Deputy | would not believe them worthy of credit, asd | clone of that of a full aud acknowle¢ged accom- | at his office and in the jail, facte, and render your verdict according to | Civ ¥ ITEMS. ie they prove. Marshal Phillips, Determine from ail the facts | you may find that some otber persons or a good | plice. You are to detormine from the evidence | 'Wnetaa Whitiey want witha thiefand bur- | those tacts. You are presumed by the rules of | TUE MAIN IfevE. | you find whether these occurrences, connected | many, would consider them worthy ot belief, | how far he wasimpliceted. Certain it is—un- | giar before the committee, or of what force | IAW to be acquainted with human nature, and | Awy @ an Overcoat should not rou must not forvet that the isue is whether | with others you may find, point to innocencs or | yet you would not legally be authorized to base | joe ue be Mie grand farce—that the pre- | Would astatement he from him in the form of | tHe Windin zs Of thet nature. You | fail to "s, No. 41° ith etreat, and man B conspiracy fo charge Alexanier | guilt—and let your verdict be according to your | your verdict of acquittal or guilty betore that | parations were deliberately made to rece Sfficavit? Does the evidence st hat he was | 8f€ to judge of the f 4 ad TO eX | ascerte iuspect the qvalities of we £eP fatering the office | Gath—that you try the care according to the evi- | consideration. You must go a step further. | Some person or persons who was or were to go | willing to ure Lim as long as he wouldexeul- | bY the pre You are | the articles be of * safe, and t wether the mete moniy | HERES. If ‘you find, however, that these acts | You must look at the relation of what they state | into the cffice abd open the sate on aeons night | pate and denennec when he can 5. | not to fing: bt— yon | ow : . z Im whether the acts would | were all done in ignorant imocence, or if you | to be facts with other facts th e satiated | undefined, that specific preparations were mate | bus? Does the evidence show that # y. » | a eee in the family bay bay need of did amount io law to bar-| haveareaconable doubt on your minds whether | have been proved. You mnst determine whether | on the night of the Zul ot April to receive them | scnght him in Canada, to use his statement, t ot the hope | Jose wife @ ‘og. wvineless e you find that the object was ty | they were done to carry out @ combination for | they have taken afew given points trom which | by watch ng, and certain it is that the office | put it torth accredited by h t to infinence your deilerations iu com hee ewing Machines ft will Sree the participation upon Alexander, if | the release of Benton according toa pian, or | to stert and which they knew would be proved, | was e: d and an explosion took place, or a | was favorable to the s ing to ac save you bus is of dollars ta money and time arge would Lave been false. shether they are not consistent with aninno- | ard thereon to build @ fiction, a romance, | sound like that of an explosion. Ie is iu evr | Reasever tad © }0u are to determine frow all the evi- nee hat meaning to attach te the language use to Hichards, to say nothing of the matter ov how it was terminated, or where the arrest bad been made, as Alexander was not found, as cent exercise of supposed authority—after the authority to represent the government had beon surrexdired to another—vou ara required by | law to give the full benefit of the reasonable | doubt to the defendant in whose favor the doabt throngh what romance and fiction would in- vole them in a rninous and long imprisonment from which nothing but mercy—whicb ts otten | rhown in its vititations when Coming trom hu- | dence by the defence thst the lock of that safe ie a combination lock. Hayes says that there wassome difficulty alont the combination loc how to open it the peat way; that he examin fidayite made by the solicitation or i and if ro, w thir core? le acting for the find from the evide) year. Easy monthiy euat your -osidenea. ebbey Vata avenge. ee | Evecanr Neckwear. geuntry out of | Superior so!, merino and cotton Fat man power—could relieve them. You must | it. This part of bia statement you are to cre fi s reade in the form of an aff tarit 1 issofficten: to | pee ' you the evidence, to be im conne: exists. determine from the evidence what motive could | or discredit as you find it consistent or ine e mace at the solicitation of ths dA and wiien | ‘ding fer vik & gton. And here it isnecessary tocall your attention | bave actuated Hayesand Zirruth ant Benton | sisient with the facts chown. It is proved that or cither of them, as a partof the The jot aang it you Bnd, trom the conduct in regard to the | to the law that you are not to hold any otuer | to have gone Into an empty safe if there was | the lock is and was a combination. Where ani | orspiracy, andif you further find that ) the prese, the loes! eo: ¢, that Harrington w party liable for the acts of either of the others, | nothing behind; provided you find from the | when dia Hayes know or find out that it was a ff to Canadito keep out of the whether indivitusis thereof, #h 1] Fine Bis thing in relation thereto, 3) | unless you have found from tae evidence the | evidence that they had reason to believe that | combination? Was the truth as he stated the | on will visit consequences upon the to treat with levity or inaitferen-e | petow t connection with all the evi 1 | Combination to have been tormed between those | nothing valuable was in the safe; and it is time, or when did he learn that character of the partes directly instrnmentai in doing 3 invel witl be trifting with all | The Perfec your minds to lusion thathe was | charged or between two of them, or those who | tor you to say What that something behind was; | ioc k? He says that le wae iu the office, and | them on y, unle dthese a. es helt sacred by iawtortheproiec- | Prices at 33 Bull you wil have to goa | jvined inafier the contederacy was formed—if | if the evidence satistics you that se nething was | tlls how be noticed it; and Benton, too. The | of the general pl. ag drancement of any country | c ) X_Felations these sct* | sou find @ confederacy to have existed or t» | behind; and then you must @nd fromtheeri- | Secree veanien te show that he could not | will sisit it upon # ging ti tor de lare catled youratten- | ae hg wrch Walt: | have received the accession of anyone or more | dence whether either of two of those indieted | huveteen thar andes the circamstaness which | cy, ifyou find such conspiracy. which took in Eng- | stip, A.B. Williams, Gunz, Hayes, | to such confederacy—and these you are to visit | were connected with what was behind, and | he states It is for you to arcive atthe tact | “7, fu nna from the evidence that Hayes mode ry after what we cil This excelienr r Benton—one, or all,or more than responsibility upon; such ouly as you Gnd to | whether that wasthe conspiracy. Remember | from al the evireve: ¥ as a com tatCmente at any time that were intended to ding immediately , | Ont own merchants, maker & Hortrog, im You will have to find that he and s-m~ | have formed the conspiracy or who joinciin | thatif there was no conspiracy then there wae | pi: ation lock the dei whenand | ben: fit any of the parties, and that he has after- t there was atrial hai barre | tO brands, eatiod G those charged, or any number of those | atier the formation. a burglary; anc if there was @ conspiracy, as ed to bring the false charg- If you find from the evidenca that Harring- where Hay: learned nade different statements, you will te lat & Oo Dey Verzeney and Goniet & x 6 time thet the ages from which | o. Extra Dry Verzenay, To charged, there was no burglary. “here might | mom the evidence— termine which to give credit to. You can credit gan. A‘rialat | enable os to vive to the pribtic in suture the ler bef ou can find bim | ton directed the movements of Kichardson the | have be’n both « conspiracy and a burglary if | knew it at all. that which you behteve to be consistent and truth- nh the work ‘k; | Me quantity of these wines we boag)t all that howe ver ¢ you may find his act | night of the def April you are to determine | the evidence shows that Harrington knew ‘We have instruct fal, or candiscredit both. Because a w tyess he execution which M . Goulet & Go. bad on hand. «mounting You must fod bis acts to have | what this meant. In determining this you are | n thing of it, orif the evidence fails to estab- | rush have confessed, and that ¢ tells a faisehood once h= 13 pot bound to adhere , inflicted ms if | 140 canes, ard can guarentee the «ame fine oe herance of the charge iu the indict- | ¢o look io the evidence as to what was dons—if tiat preparations were made by those | showstbat Benton nud Will al | therete. He may also tel apart at bs quality during the whole season. We have rex ment of conspiracy. So of each one of the | you find that anything was done by bim—to Hg control over the office to let the opening | were the perpetrato:s of the & art at another. Itistrne that he shoulit «tats wt The world duced the price 5 per cent. parties. plece books or documents in the safe ander the | of the safe be effected. Bolts or bars must have | you are t lbave no difficulty as to Hayes T to themselves, an he others caused them to do what icea of misleadin alse, you are to that oceasion, to be connected by yon with what or entrapping Alexander; ok to bis whele conduct on been broken or latches raised, or windows bre- | ken or raised, or a bolt or bar broken, or a latch or wirdow raised or broken, else there would onnect th of Benton with the Hayes. and ascertain vider A 1 that evidence farnizhes The al! that he knows or can think of. uot fold it at ene tis rat paper, But it he hae he may at another. rom Hayes tim plica- eit nader th f the history is f that trial, and ali courts ¢ rules of the Inws i Sroomaree & Herrzoa, | | 1531-55 F +treet, near Imperial Hotel. —s Ps solution to the objicta and motives of those | ted xancer, assed through the hande - ine aes Cee TaaT Never Faics.—“The You are to judge and decite from the you may find to have been provedto be hisdec | bave been no burglary. who had @ connection with the two acte; and | of Somerville. You are to determine from the | Stinesphare of ot i for consump. her they put up the matter of them- | jaration to Richards to say nothing aboat the All these matters, arising from the evidence, | further, whether these acta had a connection evidence whetber this was proc ‘and neaq i re petienn, save Dr. Erastus Wilson. No Er the office and safe. and go to | qatter, as Alexander was not aruuzed, accord | von must consider In ordet to determine what with the charges mace in the tndte'ment. You | by the defendants, or either of them, or by tie ee ‘5 dioney of Horchound and house. or were they assisted by | ing as you may find the evidence in that Par- | that evidence satisfies you was the motive | are alse to look into the manner of the escape of agent of any or s! zor. aenes ba t it by others, who were they? Does | ticatar, brging the conduct of Zirruth, Hayes, Benton | Williams, slias Bliss, and find from theevidence | “rhe afidavit, ag it is called, of Hayes was Avice Balen tle dente tee eget winds, | There is one view of the law a2 applicable to | ard tho escaped Williams. Then-you are to | Wee ee any relation toageneral plan, | optained through Somory ortly acter the ti mod. with ak t they and Ben- | the evidence which your attention must be | take all the testimony together and determine | and whether any two of the parties charged bad | knew who f peri 4 | ee wit! Z aud puriiving Juice of called to. You miust determine the facts which | whether the charge 18 proved as laid in the in- | any participation therein. ather from ali at thief was then t | the boreto id With the purest honey, ubt, that aay | the evidence proves. Does the evidence prove | dictment, or as to sny two of those charged. Js there evidence, independent of that of er 5) on trial were engagsa—aad if at ALSXANVER AND BIB CONNECTION AND cox PLICaTion. | to your minds—beyoud a reasonable doubt— | thet Harrington’s acts and conduct on the night | of the entermg his office, everytulng connected therewith as shown by the evid« nce—do all the At this point the mind reverts to the safe with the combination lock which the evidence of a | witness fur both the government and the de- fence stated Harrington did not know how to Hayes and Zirruth. to satisty your minds bs- | youd & reasonable doubt of the matters stated in regard to the entering of tue safe, the ar- ee Gefend- from the evidence, if New- | | | Somery lic | | tion wie: ! ghteousness v hat pardon. | Will do more «n ; than ne day to cure & cough or cold ibe sir of pue woods could do in twelve. ch. mor Pike 6 Toth Ache Drope—Curein one minute. Tangements made bevorehand, the conduct on ub went there to get anything tarther f ther here, by avth the oat? Core ¥ s Gentiemea there is oue view of this cass | circumstances show that there was an intention open. At this poiut—that is, taking all the evi- the night of the arrest, then you are to look to Create for whats arpose by wanted him. Was j a ork acing “ine De xk to whieh we | Durttions mr ongtes, soi oc ew take notice of | and design to falsely connect Alexander with | dence together—the mind is also forced to the | the evidence of Hayes to see what faith you wi! | jt essentis! that these defen ay of ; . | par le Doczeur White, Chinen + “| What do yoo | the transactions by which Alexander could be | details of that thoroughly-examined witness, | give to it, considering whether his statements them, should first commit Hayes to their excul- wrapti« | 15th street, oppootte the Tre ry department. evidence as to tLe power of | thought or suspectedor accused of being a party | Ki de, as to the events of that memorable | furnich you a rational and consistent concluc pation, true or false, snd then when they had bear ay es | . Brave mass ark fo Geccive ail the men with | thereto—then you will be bound tosay that here | night of the 231 of April, extending into the | sion, and {rom thee. considerations determine | fecured this thread, that they could preventtse | fold Of ami re | To Be oveko of Keptare wear the Binatic yme i coutact? The evidence, | was a wrong—and if the evidence has satictied | morning of the 2tth, The mind also rests on | what credit te give those statements. force of a full @scicsure of facts by him’ ie i. eth F rar Truss, ennsy ania avyenae northwest. 5,6 iy Heed ecg hey de: | Four minde beyond @ reasonable doubt that | the narrative of that other witness—aiso high | "In connection with the other evidence, and By ail the rules of lew, the goverument’had | i inJar-tions are é ag > ‘having led Demainginto | there wae a couspiracy somewtiere, and you | on the roll of police officers—Clarvoe. You | more fmmediately in relation to the arrest of | ana has the right and power to use this man and | Contain che BY THE Eiastic Tuvss, 235 Pennsylvania Sguizes the capacity of the | shall besatisfied that come one elso charged in | must take the two together. You must deter- | Hayes, if to your minds it throws any light on | Zirruth, too, tn order to arrive at the facts, Ph | COMES avenue. 25 a bund, aud makes au- the indictment was concerned in the same, you | mine If their statements conflict in any eesen- . | ther snd Demaine have proved tha: deceived them; they were ton ae well as Alex- | will Budbim guilty, aud tind who he ts guilty with. ARTEUR B. WILLIAwS. When you come to consider ths connestion of Arthur B. Williams with the alleged conspiracy you are to judge of it in the light of homan as party are shown tw the jury during the tran tial—material particular. if there is no con Hiet, then you you have no difficulty with their testimony. If there is a contlict, is it real, or | is it merely apparen If merely apparent, | cap you reconcile them, and did one see one thing and the ether another thing? ; that Harrington was along; that Benton was ar the main Issue of conspiracy, or no conspiracy, lock te the evidence ot Hayes as to the fifty dol- jars given him at Nettleship’s house in the evening; a# also the evidence of the other wit- nesses us to what occurred. Hayes cays be saw crape on the door ar he ap that Nottleship gave him fitty dollars—one ot evivence for the defence shows that rome of the | deferdantg, at iesst, were an Statements, and the governmest was in duty bound to get ut the facts, if these men knew | those facts, and was and is bound to protect them for ihe goéd of society, if they teli the truca, lars, and s+ a whole; aud can you, from t fous to mse his | Genth men of th , let me instruct yo a | Tre Simemn Sxwine Mac } ae were 8219.87 <loe OPIST2 12-0,0tt proached. The other witnesses siated that they | ugh that truth involves theirown disgrace: Boom that Watcher, us and of legitimate friendstips. In | They both agree that the men entered the | Nurs ut the hows aa ste nace tae | See teste tol Grom chee eee 5 | Mamita ce t,o Chana acy, and where conspiracy is charged, | office and came out by the front door; that one | family, holding watch over the lifeless somarcs Rave told and disclosed to you the plot in regart | NON © lings of hostility oF and "1 BLES extended is fur be evidence consists of the proof of many | escaped and has not been found since; that Ben- of the’ little one: ‘They all uereo ith Hayes | tothe safe, tthe cesoutialand inater ar | private 5 | reven; evideu Did it, acts by different parties, and where acts of any | ton was followed to Alexander's: hous: Goorgetown, ‘now? -6r the witnerses furnishing twenty: five dollars, an- * tye at the partics engaged? | Shar you and Fare the w me in the wor ¢ Se.% | Eotton, and these acts have to Le construed hy | rested; wnd other evidence establishes that he | other wituers. farmishieg twenty 2¢a dolisce. | imi: arate at the partes sngage | who are so minately sw hose respective | the jury, the iaw save thut you may look to the | was bailed the Saturday before the court wa: Josned Ly them to Nettleship, Meeachald: ine aon tienen | duties are so hedxed, hemmed, lea - | Justopened.on stegant « relations of the parties to sulve the true mean- | to meet on Tuesday following, after having Hayes says this money was to enable him to | Miles. They are all p: | joined. You tessceriain the facts and end CHILDERS 's FURS, in | ing Of those acta. The law, however, never | been in jail from the 2th of April to the 224 of gO mway from Washingion. What Nettlesnip | jarge family of which y } You the jaw | MINK SABLE ORTS, i celved, | means to hold one person responsible for the | August. You are to determine how, from th told the witnesses it was for is in evide: in this caso Party iceling and party faction e: okAL SETS, : ‘dan Lecthooct | acts of another, however intimste they may be, | evidence, he was bailed; who participated in you are to consider what he mud’ tenes done wrong. el | Place ip & court roo: arty triu am btath LYNZ SBTS, ix own testing Unless the facts show « participstionin the deed | it, and for what wae he bslled—determtuing | Zonnection with all the evidewse, cy’ th to expiain how he got inte the office, and how | Patty Cefects, administration favors, an 7 bs what Hayes wad | iteelf. ‘Tbe law recognizes the existence of | from all the evidence ae to the circamstances cun determine from the evidence what tha he was employed; and itis for you tw determine | #8 OF Power, can have no reating vw. ¥. Se¥mounr, “ friendship, the faith aud coutidence of one per- | attending. doltars was given him for. Nettlewnip told the | from the evidence why he ia not here, and what | S¥d!ng ‘ootheld tna court cal ersng thi sen in snother, end that friend-nip and associa The defence has introduced a witness who 1 iop must never be constraed to inv states that he went to ée in the Louse, or said in his hearing, und motivi there is in is not being here, and at } jostic To the great prin 18% Bridge etreet, Georgetown, | és “ . SahyY GAINS i” DE the acts of another unless the ev Ove | apd learn {rov: bim all about the sate usin, | PrUUMvIS In the Meaitng of others in ¢ stance is he awa, carpiucs, fectious, tooves tw at oss = t act < ce slows | and learn from ou ‘o business. | Room: ‘You little kes aan een ppires ‘ Td a a that this friendship led the arcased to tavade | ‘This was s eecret serrice employe. He had an sone atig Know what 1 borrowed that | “It appears from the evidence that Somerville « Bri arrested ax toon a8 he got to Washington.” mrad! enton. Ne } reward from cheep. a | sbip may be, however close the association, t jo wbat passed between them in To- | “The indictment charges Huycoand’Nettieahip | 12, Procure the release of Bente a wise gion | €xpectes! rising ones can give you a satin ' mornt n &, & man Of capacity | law will not excuse the gatltof sim who follows a why Haves came back voluntarily to | as two of the accomplices. You are to judgeor | he was. You have heard the argnmentof coan- | BU €Ssy Corscience. Ketter rest upon tue sat- » ‘ ¢. an expert L feetimony, cay | Lis friend to an unlawful act. dence ard was then arrested. New- | the declarations of cach. Hayes has confeosd 1 and of the party most deeply implicated | #f*ctory power that can bring order out of con aie @: using betwses te gooulue | 11 youtind from the evidence that there was ‘ates that he had no warrant for his ar- i poor Leni h 2 books of sb sand the spark cording to the rights of some one eles tion with his friend. How: ting in combina. 1 deep the friend | 4p imate association bet and Arthur B. Williams, en Harrington that Williams interview with Hayes at Toronto. You mast | determine between his evidence and that of | Where Benton is you have to ascertain | from the evidence, and why he is not hers, rest. Loney for; tt was to put @ thief inthe hands of the investigating committee, ax Hayes would be before you that he was gulity. Nettieship told the witnessee that he knew Hayes to be a thier. was the egent who proc ments of Hayes, abcut the Benton rejease; and you, geatlemen, are entrnsted with the reaponsibiltty of deter- the original sta Bt who came hers d the a, thon. world bx: ever see adiministrat psien aud Binal peace and quiet out of commo- and | The evidence shows that Netthecby oa . ~ “ } Teharze you and instruet you thst, accord- Airruth, overa- | was tn company with Harring'on on the night | how he kerps out of the way, you mast also | ant chief of the organised force for hone Reece te tie ae ee ete ee Tae | ing to th evidence in this cass, you tring tua e ud aid Led to be | of Aprils, still you, must Sod from other evi- find. You must alse datermive from = jong Of thieves, robbersand burgiais. Ho proclaimed | way so ibut be could net be made a wituess of | ¥@ Sie ef gulity or pat guilty 08 your minds lev 4 that wh: e: tence or from all taken together that be knew | wBat connection all this has with the con- in that if a “* | may be, onch one, satistied troy at evidence. ve of John O | what be was doing. nd thet be wes aidinntn epirac Bed eer house of mourning that he hat | by tke government. the conspiracy to injure Alexander by bringing There can be no doubt from the evidencethat furnished a thief with the moanx to get to the Mr. arrington and counsel argue that there Let the stones of attempted ridicule be bar- etrost * Beanti- Cloths and Csssimeres Ludien’ Dress G—@s tu the peweat #7 Gots tox Children. B. POLMAB, Presidout, B. W, BASRETT,Gssnier ee rectors investigating committee in c. te ¥. dened ¥ th malice. bate, theevil pawions which | B. Polkinborn, Dowling cer 2 falec charge as laid in the incictment, or you | Benton was the man who was arrested as the | sale mete ud that he would be eee Seccuiee item the cvsiene ensue thia'ae to | Would d ¢ pillars of an elevated haman | Henry Dicaeos, Bit Gomer’ #2. Set, of . | Bust be sauefied that he lent himself diindiy, | man who went tnto the office am had the bun- | soon as he got to Washington. Hayes was | him. If you find that he did what he did do | Ctety, (rag down fo the levelef & more mo ‘Shima. D Herter, Thos. L ea b | Botearing if his paricipation did lead tothe | die with kim to take to Alexander's house. It arrested ss sogn as he was examined b: the com- | merely as the exercise of what he thought was | contest ict those rags, but they cannot move v r to ovver int nn? heraain to nee hase | Tennis. mnatewes thas omit mij pit be—for in | Mr. suite kaa chars — es of ee, ttee, and you are to determine from what | his power—whether be ought tolave done #0 or baer rock A gy which hed been = (08 SEW esTaBlisamEnT, a“ 48 Willing to pay rea- | that even 2 respon upon | as conn wi je safe matter, which you ing strergth for ages, which loses nothing os s Peocae Bg RUAE was Out oF | thie sou lave aremonable doubt you are bound | Sreto ted from the evidence, thenas a matter | Nettigebip auld if this was part of tho general | no ™and i bad no connection with the design | ink ere @ a 4 com: 6 consideration © ow far, according tothe ev te resolve that doubt in favor of Wiliams. sented to combination to defame. A legal of Jaw, the charge thereof bad passed to him, of law, Harrington had | the management = known to sil. You mut determine from he evidence what degree of intimacy was ex- witness Cahoon objected to Hayes secing Net- driv, Benton to the tria!, bé ts entitied to that of placing Benton out of the way, then he is time; which bas stood like chastity it<eit, aver- temptation but deliver as from evil,” which no With eniar, the best talent f imprevet ; d aft Covad ta the ‘countrys ty fase TO ze ree! not to be visited with the consequences of the | “wing W\th its modesty the approach of tne #2 ery facility for a } ‘ an TLEY. ard he alone was authorized to represent the hibited, on that occasion, between Nettleship aor oe Son find that he was imposed upon ty | ducer- greny facility fur doing Saat wos Slew orto, relly By sey ns Bere alee te Sa Reng ated EP the District Attar eee rnd, DOE Paatod Out | snd Majes, and what ull meant. ‘The defense | erover-sonfidence inthe Fepresentationsof any | ., U0 not forget or omit to invoke day by day zabltc that pre—centownt qe tay bave been OOF reper aorat on esc is vs “ " » + at ition: ** 3 not {i ca scla of wu accomplished detective, | even & preumption that he knew of or con | Tact, then, asa mutter af law, Hartloann rer | Proved that Hayes called at the housa, ana | ons es to the reeponaibiil'y of the batman ty | tha: meraors ion: “Lead us not into w: oe therecf. If you fing the fact to be that the District Attorney had not passed tbe contro! of Benten to Mr. Riddle, | suspicion cannot be indulged im from this fac: Uesbip on account of the deaih, but on the | He must be proved gutity by the evidence of finding. nd if you find from the evidencethat urgency of Hayes in time to get to the Warh- bis action had no connection with keeping Ben- combination of thought or lauguage has yet been abie to improve. wies [ bave stated —t th ington tratu, witness called Notticatip, who | ton away—asa link inthe chain of evidence | These great princ'yles have been appeated to ats & persou or porsovs | acts of guilt. You must not start out with the | this connection, you are instructed. as's 7 <3 sa “ . . m act remun ving ihe high crime of because be was | cf jaw, that the. charg f Benton was | Haver’ Aner or ant eranterview with | then ‘the act in iteelf would not have been | in argument by counsel. Let Bayer. After the meeting at the steps of the such that the law authori: taken; | doar, Hayes and Nesticehie—se Rey. ‘Mr, Co; ave bail to be a and further, toat it was legal to take a man liy- went through the parlor to the kuown of and approved what his subordiaates | were deing. Tiis idea would ruin the beet of tuat the laws of your country ed to Protect and guard the tendernessns of the asso- Ctatious of life from the mere criminally wrong, whatever error there might have been in the action. J ug out of the = cousige: ing—s0 tbe law requires men,ard wecould bay no grada ton of authoriy. in New York, { his rerponsipiity cise tt Rowover, font rom. While Hayes and Nettleship were at DO} Counsel for the defence (Mr. Smithers) your notice the conversation whicl ee closer one that makes by the lawsof Jehovah bility. ., brought to lo the aucvof (he parties, youth, | You must go to the invest:gaton of bis case As | tbe facts that alt this formala was haa [aston sentence res: ‘Washi tthe | Hayes had with Ne — Pwo = aoe ap ‘Tee rate, ee . ‘ast Hares, and | that of all the others. If his authority 1s shown oe through with for the pur; of You muct 7 <i, a ed gust pet be ‘extended to snap or rend asunder ‘abe Gud cid exert | to Dave existed, however, then if may be pre | t ng Benton out of the way to avoid any trialot | th: mvection, and in connection with the | which he said . Benton and himee! thore te: der ties. The formeef law must not et of uature, or ac- sumed to bhaye continued in the line of that bim, OF any disclosure by him, then you are to w! tion, whose declaration you | worked up the matter. Hore it is argaed that | be used to prostrate hopes im this life or bring haa maces bumanbeings authozity. connect facte you find in this Nar | tha consistent—Hayes, that the ‘was | Hayes toid the trath. It ts fer you tw deter- | misery to the defendants wife or child. To up an be ous to orereuine and Lay pros- TBR VEFENCE. - with the entering the office and all the other | given } Im to stay away; or Net:leship’s, it | mine when he told the truth. He wasnotunder | guard egainst all this the same laws demand at their bid and cal Bae intellects of De. You are brought to the consideration of the | fects in the care, and determine if the facts in Was to enable bim to come to Wastington. oath then—be was whente told bis tale bare. justice in our dealings, and that we shall pot td r, aad I appa ens — that deferce iv their teatimony. Several witnesses | this connection have any relation to the con. As® matter of fact and law,of which the You must remember that be be! to the ein by intrnGing upon the rights of others - mod —— iy oadnet Pe egg peep ah ra =. ee in'eteuiens’ | Gourt will ay eae you, Sages secret service. shay sce net under oath whea begat ae dade Fear ecy: oc combinetion Rg Outof ail the evi- | ruth are rom Newark anc Newton, N J.. aul | Judge Fisher said that be did not nndererned Shesitans taumieed oo ets nee ee | eeene Dee bore ‘evidenss the ine, pales with which T | those who bear upon Hayes are frou New York | that the entire control of the Ben.on maces whie in the their occupations. | Faye good chnracter, or by ¢ the defencant or defend- | % iad been surrendered to Kiddle, if you find When to the witness stand in a court; eo! will go to confirm doubt ormay doubt. You are to con ere ts that abont Zirruth and Heyes and | fr om that evidence that it hed not bese sur- legally sworn to tell the trath, you are to | even serve to throw adeub: when the whole sinthe light of human the witnerses introduced to Impeach them that | rew look to the evidence to ascer- imine far they tell tho facts as they | evidence will cdmit it. Ba evidence, facts, ao\ons, and your verdict must be | produces, in the estimation uf the law, som) | tam Ww! been be went into the office of | avd circumstances which mu«’ carry cony ction o » Dancactions growing out of the | Fetation fo the astonisiing and singular post- | the c defence almits tuat he | to the mind cannot be perm tted to be over- wer ip this cacse. | tlons of men to society. They have ail tonto} of April. That morning | looked and set at naught, and it these facts and it you Sac fom tue evidence that Alexander | more or less connected with some organ zation | dence, ¥ B had received | Circumstances arteing out of the evidence leays a6 pure ip Lis off “ste—connection with Hayes, that had some claim to Pablic cor | been dor went to the office | nO reatonable doubt then daty i plsia cerps. The public ber eB" you are to judge of. | this, in counterfeit mat. #nd thia character must yield t0 stili’barw cok and that Herrington was teeking te do Aiexan- | Few ave bed such case before tuem. | find to ‘was at the office that | dunce. der a great wrong by bi & false accuss- | with such diversity of facts to consider of, and | fiom the as argued by the de-| Judge Hamphreys concladed the reading f hen sgainst hem, thea Be is guilty before the yet the law le ual to ail. asocandi a ante, the letter reesived foe cherge at 2.48 o'clock, having commenced find consider jenes turned Haves aud :