The Daily Worker Newspaper, September 10, 1934, Page 6

| Page Six DAILY WORKER, NEW YORK, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1934 ‘Daily, QWorker | GRBTERL CBee COMMUNIST PARTY ESA (SECTION OF COMMUNIST UNTSREATIOMAL) “America’s Oniy Working Class Daily Newspaper” FOUNDED 1924 PUBLISHED DAILY, EXCEPT SUNDAY, BY THE COMPRODAILY PUBLISHING CO., INC., 50 E. 18th Street, New York, N, ¥. Telephone: ALgonquin 4-795 4 Gable Address: “Daiwork,” New York, N. ¥ Washington Bureau: Room 954 onal Press Building, 1éth and PF St., ¥ r ne’ National 7910. Midwest Burea 705, Cheago, Ml Telephone: Dearbe By Mail: (except 1 year, $6.00 8 months, $3 5 cents Manhattar 1 year, $9.00 3 months, $5.00; 3 $3.00. By Carrier: Week ints; monthly, 75 cents. ooo SOOO MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1934 Boston and Greensboro WO developments have taken place in our drive to place the» Daily Worker in the hands of the textile strikers. The Communist Party district in the Carolinas has placed the following orders for additional papers: Burlington, N. C. 100 Concord, N. C. +100 Danville, Va coveses e100 Durham, N.C, ....++++ 25 Clover, S. C. . eeneie 25 Charlotte, N. C. 50 This increase of 400 papers daily in the South, east shows that our y striving to solve | orker circulation while still insufficient, at Southern comrades are the burning problem of seri Daily UT Boston, instead of improving, has moved back- wards, Worcester has written cutting the daily extra strike bundle from 100 to 50 per day. The other Massachusetts cities remain as listed Saturday. This makes it necessary to ask quite openly of the leading comrades of the Boston district, the District Organizer, the District Committee mem- bers, and the Section Organizers: What are you going to do about Daily Worker circulation during the textile strike? he Central Committee has wired the District propesing that he personally assume the for doubling all orders in the textile Wednesday: towns before The Daily Worker will report tomorrow on Com- Trade Sparks’ reply. | | | | | On Young Textile Workers S ALL textile workers who read the Daily Worker know, the Communist Party unconditionally supports the textile workers’ own demands as they drafted them at the U. T. W. convention. There is, however, one serious prob- lem which the strikers should seriously | consider: that of the young workers in the textile industry. | At least 35 or 40 percent of those working in the textile mills are young peotple, boys and girls, | less than 21 years of age. This is particularly true | in the South. As all textile workers know child | Jabor also has not been abolished despite all the Sweet-sounding speeches of administration spokes- men. These young people, thousands of them mere children, suffer most from the speed-up, and in addition they receive lower wages than the older workers under the svecial “apprentice and learner” Clauses of the textile code. We would urge the textile workers as a whole to consider the position of these young people. It | seems to us that in the strike settlement a de- | termined effort should be made to win concessions for the youth Discrimination under “apprentice and clauses” should be ended. They should equal pay for equal work. Child labor likewise should be exposed and ended. All children under 16 now being forced into the milis due to the poverty of their parents should be | maintained by the government. The Communist Party urges the textile workers in every locality to discuss these proposals, and in- | sist that they be incorporated in any agreement reached with the textile br learner receive The Morro Castle Disaster O SOONER had the news of the Morro Castle holocaust been flashed to the press when a vicious campaign to incite the hor- ror-struck people against organized labor began. This is most clearly expressed in | the ugly rumors of “sabotage,” of “in- cendiary origin” of the fire, of a “time bomb” placed on board the ill-fated ship by Cuban longshoremen, etc. | The flimsy nature of these lies—denied even by | Coast Bosses Plan Fascist Network ‘unjustified” strike: The creation of Inc.,” significantly The same source said the new or- ganization would speak out against @ number of authorities—is best ated by a number of Morro Cas ewhere today’s Daily Worker. What s out in the tragedy: seamen, printed 1, Insufficient men on watch; overworked crews. 2. Defective fire equipment. 3. Failure of the officers to organize effective rescue work, These were the major reasons for the disaster. The W worst exploi d Line, cursed by seamen as one of the of marine labor, has a record of n. The callous policy of the line, seeking dividend: her than safety, firing men, runn a large ship with so few on watch, is the chief reason for the disaster. peed-up of 1 sea- Another LaGuardia and O’Ryan Outrage AYOR La Guardia’s list actions mounts. Another point can be scored on the roll of attacks on the working-class with the raid of a dozen detectives Thursday night on the headquarters of the Fur Workers Industrial Union, the searching of the premises, the breaking of desk locks, the confis- cation of papers and the arrests of eleven workers— all this without even the formality of a search war- rant! Thus La Guardia and his police chief O'Ryan show their “friendliness to labor.” of anti-labor The latest attack was undoubtedly inspired, as the Fur Workers Industrial Union charges, by a number of manufacturers and the leaders of the defunct A. F. of L. union in the trade. It comes in suspicious sequence to the victory won by the F. W. I. U. against the manufacturers and the signing ot an agreement entailing important concessions for the workers. La Guardia cannot dodge the responsibility. The workers of New York must place it at his door in emphatic terms and demand a cessation of these attacks on labor. All workers’ organizations must make the most vigorous protests against the latest La Guardia-O’Ryan outrage! For Negro Equality OUTHERN textile workers have every reason now to revise completely the attitude toward the Negro masses, care- fully instigated by the Southern capital- ists and landlords. The ruling class has for years stirred up hatred against Negroes. They, said the capitalists, are “inferior.” The white workers were lined up against the Negroes in the name of “race purity” and other such bogeys. Now the class war between the textile bosses and the workers has reached a high point in the South. The Southern bosses and their hirelings in state offices are shooting down white workers. Nine workers have been murdered already in cold blood. Hundreds have been wounded, many seriously. The bosses, who in the past have sought to divide the working class by playing white against Negro work- ers, are now threatening to bring Negro workers into the mills to replace whites, The Negro workers, however, cannot be trans- formed into scabs so easily, even though many Negro leaders may advise such a course with the tricky promises that the strike offers the Negroes an opportunity to secure jobs in an industry pre- viously closed to them. Negro workers, on the contrary, are actively sup- porting the textile strike. Two incidents are typical. Negro tobacco workers in the Greensboro area have voted to contribute $1 per week each out of their meager earnings to aid the textile strikers. Negro sharecroppers around Huntington, Alabama, have likewise decided to give direct material aid to the strike, * . . 'HESE are straws in the wind which show the growing class soiidavity between the Negro and white toilers in the South. They show the possi- bilities for a fighting alliance between the Negro and white workers against the white ruling class which lynches Negroes and now murders white strikers. The lynching of Negroes in the past, their ex- ploitation and persecution, has been inseparably connected with the greed of the white landlords and capitalists for profits, and with their desire to keep the toiling masses, Negro, white, divided in order to insure continued boss-class rule, The white workers, now that they see the mur- derous policies of the white bosses in the present strike, and the loyal support of the Negro workers, should join with the Negrces in a fight against per- secution, jim-crowism and lynching. They should fight for full equality for the Negro workers, in the first place'yin the textile mills. One of the demands of the present strike should be the right of the Negro workers to all jobs, and at the same wages as other workers. Such a fight by the textile strikers would do much to advance the unity of Negro and white workers in a common struggle for improved conditions, tify them.” This source did admit. |some of the ‘America First! announced at | Ti een by the facts —— | striking however, that the backers include | “ay by the British Trade Union| 100,900 industrialists ‘ : 0 got, True’s confidential reports, |™ajor portion of the session was | e fact that the money represents (Continued from Page 1) anti-union connections, is vice-pres- ident of “America First! Inc.” Its secretary-treasurer is Walter L. Reynolds, who was secretary until recently to Hamilton Fish, million- aire Red-baiting Representative in Congress. President of “America First! Inc.,” is James True, veteran reactionary news correspondent who has recently been engaged in send- ing confidential reports from Wash- ington to industrialists. Expect Aid From Woll “America First! Inc.” undoubtedly will use the press, radio and public speakers in a campaign to whip up patrioteering sentiment against all union labor struggles, as well as @gainst “radicalism” and “subver- dag activities. One of those close it informed this reporter today that they are getting co-operation from “free labor—that is, labor not connected with unions.” This source said they “would not ap proach” union labor, although they expected co-operation from certain individuals in unions. “Such as Matthew Woll?” I a £y was the reply. Woll is the profes- sional Red-baiting racketeer asso- ciated with Ralph Easley and Fish in the National Civic Association, the height of the general strike, foreshadows a drive by the most reactionary of American capi- talists to ride herd on Congress this winter for anti-radical legislation. Press Propaganda Planned The Pacific Coast industrialists, advancing upon Washington as backers for “America First! inc.,” have two purposes: to exploit the circumstance that this is .he national journalistic center, it is possible to spread propaganda | through publicity releases to news- | Papers reaching millions of work- ers; and to develop as much ag pos- sible a real mass base for “Vigilante” | activities. The Hearst-like “Amer- | |ica First! Inc.,” whose very name conveys its jingoistic employers’ in- | terest, also expects the co-operation |of such “patriotic” outfits as the | Navy League, it was learner The Navy League, established by P. Morgan and other financiers and industrialists, is only a paper ganization, but it wields iremendous influence through propaganda and lobbying. Coast Bosses Back Group There was no indication of the financial backing of the new group in its public announcement. Sources close to them refused even confi- dential information as i this. ¢3"- jing that “nine out of ten of our backers refuse to allow us to idea- textile | Pacific Coast capitalists who have | extended their operations to Wash- ington following the general strike is obvious from Armstrong’s connec- ions. He was for many years Washing- ton correspondent for the Los An- geles Times, the reactionary new: |paper whose anti-iabor camozizn: |egainst the McNamara’s, against 'Tom Mooney and others culminated in an already notor egainst the general st: | Angeles Steamship Company, rep- resented here by Armstrong, has for its ‘vice-presi: Herry Chandler, owner and: publisher of the same Los Angeles Times, organizer of a | syndicate that bought 862,009 acres |of Lower California land on which jagricultural workers slave and starve, trustee with Herbert Hoover of Leland Stanford University. The Los Angeles Steamship Company 's a subsidiary of the Matson Naviga- |tion Company, operators of a fleet of vessels carrying freight and a . Matson also owns the Oceanic Line which plies betwen ihe Pacific Coast, Japan and China. Our Readers Must Spread the Daiiy Worker Among tiie Members of All Mass and Fraternal Organ- izations As a Political Task of First | Importance! f ‘Soviets Vote To Reorganize ‘Trade Unions |Division into Small Groups Resolved Upon at Moscow (Special to the Daily MOSCOW, Sept. 9 (By Wireless) —The meeting of the All-Union Central Trade Union Council ended \here yesterday after adopting a | resolution to divide trade union | into smaller units and reorganize them. The question of reorganization of the Soviet trade unions arose in connection with the successful ful- fillment of the First Five-Year Plan and the great tasks of the Second | Five-Year Pian. Aleng with the growth of Social: econemy, the trade unions incre and are still increasing. | Among fort; yen trade unions in jthe U.S.S.R., nineteen have 300,000 members, while three have over] 1,000,000 members Worker) The metal workers’ trade union unites 104 factory committees in the | | most varied regions of the South }and Central European part of the| | Soviet Union, in the Urals and in | Siberia, | The coal min union unites | 8,507 mine committees. The union of w rs in the general machine | industry, which ha | 1,032,000 members, unites 1,425 fac- | | construction | tory committees, etc. | The trade unions require a more differentiated and concrete ap- | proach to every branch of economy for serving the needs and require- |ments of the various professions land groups of workers and em- | ployes. But the enormous size of |the trade unions makes their work | | complicated, and hinders every-day | | contacts of the trade union leaders with the masses of members Therefore the question of the re- | construction of the trade unions | | was mainly in the direction of the | further reduction in size. Instead | of the existing forty-seven unions, | jit was decided to form 154, Some trade unions were divided merely | according to sub-branches of in- | dustry. | Thus for example, instead of a} |union of Transport Machine Con- struction, there will be a union of | Transport Machine Construction | | and a Union of Shipbuilding Works. | Another part was reduced accord- |ing to territorial principle. Out of |the Union of Workers in Heavy | Metallurgy wil be formed three | unions—Metallu of the South, | East and Cente; | The central committee of sixty- | five trade unions will not be in | Moscow, but directly at the place} | of concentration, on a productional | basis. This will unite the workers. | Regional and town committees will | be liquidated in forty-three unions | | and their central committees will be | connected directly with the factory | | committees. | The Educational Workers’ Union| | will be split into eight unions—five | unions of workers in the elementary | | and secondary schools of the various | | Republics of the Soviet Union, a| [tise of Workers in the Universi- ties and Scientific Institutions, a Union of Kindergarten Workers, etc. | | These will not be midget unions. | Life is moving rapidly in the |US.S.R. The growth of culture in |the country is giving rise to new | professions. One hundred and | twenty-six thousand persons are oc- cupied in Kindergarten work alone. | |The number of teachers in the) country now reaches 800,000. | In addition to reducing the size of the trade unions it was also decided | to form professional sections inside of each union, for example, a sec- | tion of enginemen in the railway- men’s union, Characteristic is the fact that in | spite of the increased number of | trade union members, the paid em- | ployes of the trade unions has been |reduced. The center work in the | trade unions has been transferred, | | attracting voluntary activists from | | among the workers’ unions who ful- | fill their social functions in trade unions in their spare time, British Unions Vote Sympathy 'To Strike Here | WEYMOUTH, England, Sept. 9— | A resolution of sympathy with the textile workers of the United States was adopted Wednes- Congress, now meeting here. The | devoted to a discussion of the} American strike, The Congress heard of the sirike| ‘from M. J, Calloran, fraternal dele- | gate of the American Federation of Labor to the Congress. The sympathetic gesture of the| Congress, it 1s observed here, is not so much 2 refiection of the attitude of officials of the British trade} union movement—they are notice- | ably lukewarm to strikes—but is | rimarily an expression of the worm, support the American strike is re-| ceiving from weakers and mill hands of Lancashire and other textile sections in England. Work- | ers there are following with the ut- most interest the day-to-day devel- ‘opments in the great strike sweep- ing across the United States, Union Butchers Force | Boss To Rehire Leader) PHILADELPHIA, Sept. 7.—Mili- | iont action by Local 101 of the | United Meat Cutters, butchers’ sec- | tion of the Food Workers Indus- | trial Union, won a partial victory when Judge McDevitt denied an in- | junction prohibiting picketing of | Irving’s Meat Market, and forced Meyer Leace, who hed been fires THE TRAP The Most Burning Question --- Unity of Action By BELA KUN Member of the Presidium of the Communist International NCE again the Communists say to the workers of Social-Democratic and reformist organizations and to their functionaries: Do you net feel that the advance of fascism in a number of countries, the direct preparations which are being made for a new imperialist slaughter of the peoples, the fur- ther degradation of the position of the working class, must unite us. You follow your leaders, who, as we are convinced, pursue an incorrect policy, the policy of class collaboration, a policy which does not correspond to the interests of the proletariat but to those of the bourgeoisie, We believe that our criticism of your Party is correct. But the attacks on the policy of your leaders were not, for us, an end in themselves; they were always and they still are a means in the struggle for establishing the unity of the working class against capitalism. In order to break the bonds of class collabora- tion with the bourgeoisie—bonds which hold fast such an important part of the working class as the adherents of Social-Democracy represent—in order that we may be able jointly to wage a common struggle against the common enemy, in order to achieve this minimum which is necessary for suc- cessful struggle against fascism, we were, are, and remain ready to make this concession to your lead- ers. We steadfastly hope that the common struggle of Communist and Social-Democratic workers—even though it means temporarily abendoning an im- portant condition of workers’ democracy, polemics against incorrect policy—that this struggle will con- vince the Social-Democratic workers that the sole correct tactic of the working class is not the re- formist policy, not class collaboration with the class enemy, but the irreconcilable revolutionary class struggle against capitalism and its rule. C. P. WILL FOLLOW STERN PATH It follows from this conviction that the Com- munist Parties will not let themselves be detérred, either by the courteous or by the malicious refusals of any Social-Democratic Party, from pursuing the path of consistent struggle for the unity of action of the proletariat. No matter what answers are given by the Social- Democratic leaders to our proposals for unity of action, we will call upon the proletarians, no matter to what party they may belong, to engage in com- mon action against capitalism, fascism and im- perialist war, for the defense of the living interests, for the defense of the rights of the workers. We are ready to make proposals to the leaders of the Social-Democratic Parties as well; we are ready to negotiate. But we know that it is our absolute duty to make these proposals not only to the Social- Democratic Party leaders, that it is our duty not to conduct our negotiations behind the scenes. If some Communists have not learned this, they must now above all realize that every proposal made to a Social-Democratic Party executive or to the leaders of a reformist trade union, must be backed up by hundreds of applications to all organizations of the Secial-Democratic Parties and reformist trade uniens. BROAD MASS WORK NECESSARY By means of broad mass work we must ensure that the adherents of the Social-Democratic Parties, the members of reformist trade unions, know of every proposal made by a Communist Party for joint action against the class enemy, If the Com- munists in France, in Switzerland or in England, have neglected to make proposals of action every day in the Social-Democratic Party organizations thrcugh delegations and in the lecal organizations of the reformist trade unions through the Commu- nist groups, if they have neglected to hold joint meetings of Communist and Social-Democratic workers, this was unquestionably a mistake. Such a militant campaign for unity of action as is repre- sented by the proposals for the rescue of Thael- mann, for the struggle against German fascism, must be spread abroad in tens and hundreds of thousands of leaflets, must be accompanied by the | ; resolutions of hundreds of Communist and Social- | ¢rets to the potential | Democratic organizations, staffs of factories, etc. Only such a broad common struggle of Commu- nist and Social-Democratic trade union members, of members of reformist and of revolutionary or- ganizations, while drawing in the broadest sections of the unorganized proletarians, can bring about unity of action, What has been let slip hitherto in this campaign against fascism and for the rescue of Thaelmann, must be made good in the immediate future. COMMUNISTS DO NOT STOP HALF WAY We shall not tire of the struggle for unity of ac- tion! We shall achieve it despite all, in spite of everything! Again and yet again we say to the Social-Democratic workers: You do not know us Communists if you think that we are going to stop half way. The struggle for the united front of the working class is a point in the program of the Communist International, and we, whose actions never belie our words, take our program seriously. Despite diplomacy, despite rude refusals or silence in answer to our proposals, we shall turn to you again, ready to struggle together with you against capitalism, against imperialist war, against fascism, for our common class interests and against the | emergency of the day, You Social-Democratic workers should not stop half way either. Join the ranks in the united action of the working class for victory over the class enemy. . . . it. ANY ARGUMENT IS GOOD ENOUGH S the events in the struggle for unity of action have shown, it is becoming increasingly less possible simply to pass over in silence the offers made by the Communist Parties to the Social- Democratic Parties and their organizations. The working class’s urge to unity on the one hand, and on the other hand the pressure brought to’ bear by the bourgeois allies, are compelling the Social- Democratic Party leaders to give open answers to the offers made. And just because of this urge to unity on the part of the working class, they are compelled to produce argument for the rejection of these offers. It must be said that these arguments do not look as if their investors had wasted much pains upon them. It denotes, to some extent, an underestima- tion of the mental requirements and political level of the Social-Democratic workers when the Social- Democratic leaders deem that they can convince their followers with arguments such as these. True, it must be granted that it is an extremely difficuit task to find even the semblance of an argument for rejecting the idea of unity of action. Nevertheless, it would seem that the Social-Democratic Party leaders, who reject the offers of the Communist Parties, take very little trouble to produce their arguments in such a way that the members of their parties may at any rate receive the impfession that their leaders are seriously considering the possibili- ties of setting up a broad united front against fas- cism and the offensive of capital. None the less, we feel ourselyes obliged to an- swer these arguments, Let us take the most typical of the reasons put forward as grounds for rejecting the Communist Parties’ proposals to organize the joint struggle against the common ciass enemy; and let us answer these arguments seriously, devoting to the task that seriousness with which not only Communists but also Social-Democratic workers are fighting for unity of action. (To Be Continued) | we shall discover the owner of the market to rehire [x organizational activities, Mexican Printers Call Strike in Protest of U.S. Mill Slaughier | MEXICO CITY, Mexico, Sept. 9.| —Enraged,at the slaughter of nine textile strikers in the, United States, the Commercial Graphi Arts Union here voted to strike ‘n sympathy with their American orothers and against the terror of She American textile mill owners. A resolution of protest passed Saturday says that the Mexican printing workers will strike against “the useless murders committed by armed forces in that country on cour comrades with the pretext of maintaining a capitalism which is universally repudiated.” | COUNCIL MOVES QUARTERS | NEW YORK.—The Lower Wil- iamsburgh Locel of the Unempley- |ment Council has moved to new |headauarters at 413 South Fourth St., Brooklyn, N. ¥. The council local will be open from 10:30 a. m. to 11 p. m, daily, Cotton Pickers’ Strike in Arizona Is Solid in Union Wage Demand CCOLIDGE, Ariz, Sept. 9. — Stending firm in their demand for jeno dollar a hundred pounds, 300 ‘cotton pickers in the Coolidge aroa, ‘under the leadership of the Can- Inery and = Agricultural Workers Union, a T. U. U. L. affiliate, are out on strike. The pickers have drafted a slid- ing scale of wages based on the iprice of cotton, On the World Front By HARRY GANNES. |Arms and the Senators | Wall St. Mystery Men Child Bearing Animals SENATE committee is stirring the witches caule tron of munitions manuface turers’ scandals. But the senators take great care only to skim the surface, and not to rake too deeply where the juiciest and largest hunks of ine formation lie. It is quite probable, | too, that before they go much fure ther the ladle will be snatched out of their hands as it was in the finance investigation, | * * . HAT is the aim of -these| ine vestigations which show intere |national graft of the armament | manufacturers? World capitalism | is plunging ahead as never before |toward war. Armaments costs ara swallowing up the dwindling gove |ernment income. In Japan, for exe |ample, the acknowledged military |budget takes 60 per cent of the total budget; and the actual direct military expenditures certainly con- sume around 70 per cent, A sime ilar situation exists in the United States, England, France, Italy, Ger- yes can see munitions | being piled s high; can see tre- | mendous warship and _ military plane construction. Instinctively, | the masses dread and hate these |gigantic war preparations. Some- | body must be blamed for it without | endangering the whole war program of imperialism. The patriotic sheep must be divided from the profit- rabbing goats. | The task was already begun by several enterprising journalists in | this country and by various peace | organtizations in England. The fun- | damental thesis of the Senate in- | vestigation was already stated in | the popular books, “Merchants of | Death,” and “Blood, Iron and Prof- its,” and in England in the “Black International” * so. | HE big bad wolf of world arm- | aments are not imperialist gov- |ernments, not the decaying rotten capitalist system which drives to \a criminal war as the only way out |of the crisis, but the individual | armaments manufacturers. In fact, | these armaments manufacturers fail jin their patriotism. For their own Profits they sell arms and war se- imperialist enemies. Their profiteering ham- pers adequate war preparations. Here two birds can be killed with one investigating stone. The blame for some of the obvious war prep- arations can be put on the muni- tions manufacturers, and the cost for still further arming can be low- ered by exposing the graft of the “mystery” Zaharoffs, who are no | mysteries at all. The anti-munitions books, and, it later in the Senate investigations if they are allowed to go on, declare that the munitions manufacturers actually ereate wars in order to consume more of their products. The pur- pose here, of course, is to cover up the real war maker—imperialism and the whole course of the capi- talist’ class in their struggle for world markets, for new colonies and plunder. That the armament manufac- | turers strive for war, nobody will the But they are merely h-pressure salesmen It is not because Morgan, Schwab & Co. desire profits chiefly that | Secretary of the Navy Swanson and Roosevelt call for a navy second to none. It is because Roosevelt, ex- pressing the interests of American imperialism, desires to have a navy capable of grabbing markets and colonies second to none that huge barrels of profits are piled up for the warship builders, a . 'HERE is ten times more mystery about the war profits and in trigues of Morgan, du Pont, Melion, than there ever was about Sir Basil Zaharoff. Zaharoff’s lie is as open as Mae West,’ as compared to that of Wall Street bankers who con- trol munitions manufacturers in the United States. In the Senate investigation, as startling and sensational as the in- formation adduced is, it must be pointed out that the senators with malice aforethought picked out the relative small fry to begin with. This gives du Pont and Morgan time to cook up their stories, if they are ever called at all. We may be sure that whenever the shoe pinches too close to the Roose- yelt regime (and since the Roose- velt regime has the greatest war construction program since the last world slaughter this cannot be avoided), the investigations will either stop or go into secret ses- sion, ike atest 3 IT IS quite fitting that the gang of perverts, dope fiends, homo- sexuals and sadists who rule Gere many should pronounce their proe gram on the women question. Hit- ler on Saturday devoted an entire speech to the future of women in | Germany. He put the question very simply. German fascism has only one outleok for women, he said— they must become child-bearing animals. “The idea of women’s rights in politics,” he said, “is a product of decedent Jewish intel- lectualism,.” That’s giving too much credit to Jewish intellectualism. The Nazis have their own KKK program for women, It is the an- cient feudal dictum which was ex- pressed in Germany as_ kuche, kirche, kinder (kitchen, church and ing children to be butchered on the child-bearing aim a little further, He specifically wants the women to a 2 themecives entirely to ber- children to be butched on the ttileficld for fascism, “While man makes his supreme sacrifice on the field of battle,” he said, “woman fights her supreme battle for her nation when she gives life to ® J child.” ‘