The Daily Worker Newspaper, September 8, 1934, Page 8

Page Eight Daily <QWorker | PanTRAL ORGAN COMMUNIST Ue S.A (FECTION OF COMMUKIST (HTEREATIONASD “America’s Only Working Class Daily Newspaper” FOUNDED 1974 PUBLISHED DAILY, EXCEPT SUNDAY, BY THE | COMPRODAILY PUBLISHING CO., INC., 50 E. 13th Street, New York, N. ¥. Telephone: ALgonquin 4-795 4. Cab Washington 14th and F St Midwest Bureau Telephone: Dear! nal 7 By Mail 6 months (except 33.50 and Canada $3.00. monthly, 75 SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1934 Federal vs. State Troops NDER the pretext of “protecting strik- ers,’ Gorman is appealing to Roose- velt to send Federal troops into the tex- tile strike area. Every time heretofore Federal troops were used in strikes, as in the 1919 steel strike, they were brought in definitely to break the strikes, Governor Olson of Minnesota also declared he called the militia into the truckmen’s strike to “help the strikers.” They “helped” them by arresting 200, ing union headquarters, and beating up strikers. Even more directly than the militia, the Federal troops are the armed forces of the employers and their government. specifically trained to preserve the profits of the bosses and to maintain capitalism. The Federal troops, under the mercenary officers of the capitalists, are a specially trained armed force of the employers, an@ would be used ruthlessly to smash the strike and protect the scabs and the employers, not the strikers. When Federal troops are called in they come in to protect private property and the profits of the exploiters, of the mill owners. Textile workers! Reject this move of Gorman to bring in the army against your strike under the pretext of protecting you! Once military bayonets come to the mills, no matter in whose hands they appear, they 1 be used against you! rai Inexcusable ! HE Daily Worker is giving more com- plete coverage to the textile strike than any other newspaper. Moreover it is daily answering the bosses’ attacks on the strikers, warning the strikers against all strikebreaking maneuvers from whatever source, and guiding them on the measures to be taken to strengthen their fighting front. As a part of its efforts to aid the txtile workers toward victory, the Daily Worker, as the mouthpiece for the Céntral Committee of the Communist Party, guidance to the Party umits, sec- A number of Party districts have woefully fallen down on their job, that of bringing the paper to the workers. We single out the Boston district as an exam- ple. With many thousands of workers in the Bos- ton area on strike, the Boston comrades are now circulating the following number of papers in the rrincipal textile areas: Lawrence—50, Lowell—150. Fall River—150. New Bedford—500. Providence—200, Pawtucket—125. Lynn—100. Worcester—100, Springfield—200 To put the case clearly and simply: pelitical scandal! The leading comrades of the Boston district, and the comrades in charge of the work in the cities is ty-bound to render an explanation to this is a Immediately the Boston comrades and com- rades in other textile centers are charged with the task to getting the Daily Worker into the hands of the broad mass of the strikers. We expect orders for papers, plus serious poli- tical explanations. For Solidarity with the Textile Strike OLIDARITY actions with the militant, striking textile workers cannot be post- poned one moment. All workers—Social- ists, Communists, A. F. of L. members, unorganized workers, are duty bound to join together immediately in a determined effort to stop murder and terror, and to establish the right of the textile workers to wage their fight for improved conditions. In three days ten workers have been murdered outright. Hundreds have been severely wounded, clubbed, gassed, shot down. Armed troops, police equipped with gas guns and rifles, and armed company thugs are everywhere being mobilized against the textile The Roosevelt “New Deal” rezime and the sup- porters of Roosevelt in the various textile -states are using the mailed fist against the textile work- €rs in an effort to break their e and to drive them back to work under conditions dictated by the textile bosses. This requires united working class action defense of the textile workers, in HE National Executive Committee of the Social- ist Party, while shelving the Communist united front proposals, has left the door open for such DAILY WORKER, NEW YORK, SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1934 local united action. In their letter to the Com- munist Party they state “We are aware that there are questions arising from time to time, mestly in the field of civil liberties, in which it is desirable that there shall be effective local action for the defense of work- ers’ rights. We are therefore drawing up a plan to govern co-operation (between Communists and Socialists) in this field.” Certainly strikers, and the resulting need for quick solidarity action comes within the terms of this decision, if the decision means anything at all. And cer- tainly in such a situation days and weeks cannot be wasted drawing up plans. Immediate united action necessary. The Communist Party proposes that each of its districts, sections and units approach the corre- sponding body of the Socialist Party without delay with proposals for direct joint aid to the textile strikers Solidarity meetings and demonstrations be jointly carried through. y the local Socialists should rally the workers for in every locality is should and Communists mass protests against the localities Jointly. centered they should arouse pathetic strike action with the textile workers. The right of the textile strikers to carry on in where the terror is the workers for sym- their fight must be workers. won with the help of all Phoenix, Arizona NCONFIRMED reports from Phoenix, Arizona, state that one worker is dead, one is dying, and at least 70 are injured following an attack by police upon a demonstration of the jobless. Following the attack, police descended upon the workers’ headquarters and seized 22 workers, | The Phoenix jobless, seeking to establish the barest minimum of relief standards, in sustained struggles for the past ten days, have demonstrated their determination not to starve. They are fight- ing against relief standards which have been slashed by reduced Federal appropriations. In February, F.E.R.A. reports show, average relief to a family was $15.01 a month. In March, this was cut to an average of $13.52 a month—43 cents a day to a family for food, rent, clothing, fuel and medical attention, Exact figures on the latest cuts are not available. The answer to their demands has been poison gas and clubs. Likewise, the answer to the textile workers, who are striking to establish the barest minimum necessary for life, has been bullets, gas and clubs. ‘ne Communist Party calls upon the employed and unemployed workers everywhere to resist these murderous attacks by forging a solid united front against the attacks of the Roosevelt “New Deal” of hunger. Rubbed Out NE of the cruder rats of American journalism, Howard Guilford, former editor of the Minneapolis Weekly Press, has just been bumped off. This Guilford for years has been mak- ing a living selling his “inside dope” on the doings of the various prominent citi- zens of Minneapolis. Now they are trying to pin the killing on the “Reds”! | Why should the “Reds” bother about a skunk | like Guilford, who lived on the pickings that he fleeced from his wealthy prominent friends? | Guilford was only one of the more clumsy black- | mailers in American capitalist journalism who could never hurt the Communist Party, the mass Party of the working class that opposes individual vio- lence in all its forms. | Undoubtedly, Guilford stepped too hard on the toes of his wealthier victims. And in true Amer- | ican gangster style they had him efficiently rubbed | out. Soviet ‘Debts’ IHOOSING the time when the Japanese militarists are pressing hard for war | against the Soviet Union on the Man- | churian border, the Roosevelt State De- | partment brings the American-Soviet debt | discussions to an impasse. The whole basis of Wall Street’s debt claims against the Soviet Union rests on the rotten foundation of loans to the Czarist, Kerensky and counter-revolu- tionary Kolchak-Denikin bandits. The Soviet Union proposes heavy trading with the United States, the purchase of machinery and other goods to speed the Second Five-Year Pian. of money never received by the Russian masses, nor by any government representing them, The American government wants $500,000,000 from the Soviet Government—money handed oyer by the American government to counter-revolutionists working to overthrow the victorious proletarian dic- tatorship. The Soviet Government has offered all sorts of concessions on these unjust debts, is ready to open trade operations on a larse scale on credit—a credit backed up by a government that has never defaulted on its commitments. But Washington and Wall Street prefer to fan the flames of anti-Sovist mancuvers throughout the world by insisting that the Russian masses | pay for every bullet used to kill their brothers. In this way, the Roosevelt government aids the plans of Japanese imperizlism and Hitler for provocations against the Soviet Union, for a united capitalist front against the land of Socialism. Every workers’ organization and every friend of the Soviet Union should voice his protest against | theze tactics. Protests should be sent to Roosevelt and to the State Department against the Policy of forcing payment cf “debts” that were in reality | Wall Sireet’s subvention of counter-revolution, and demanding the opening of credit arrangements for trade with the Soviet Union. Max Bedacht To Speak! Tomorrow on History) joc North, of of the Communist Party ¥!! speak today. jWwill be a 15th Anniversary Concert, | the a spectacular pageant and the Hans Max Bedacht, member of Central Committee of tne Commu- Eisler Trio. voted to the 15th the Communist Party. nverssry of Curtain Workers Win the New Masses, Tonight thore | NEW YORK. — Workers of the tyle Curtain Compeny, 28 West af i “ERPURY ait 3 i n of the union aficr| nist Party since its birth, will trac Mike Gold, proletarian novelist * the leadershin of the| ory of the “Party” at a and columnist, will discuss the rev- in and Drapery Wortzers 2 ae ae Seen, Air jolutionary press, and tomorrow | Union. 40 West 18th S:.. Manh-ttan. phasis pis eree: nedsis, there will be a huge banquet to| The union is conducting a 5 The entire week-end will be de- anniversary, 4 3 . honor the Communist Party on ee the “1 Curtain Cqm- | 153 Nios the murderous attacks on the textile | In reply, the Roosevelt regime demands payment | Demands After Strike t. heve won wage inercas ses | Farmers Raise ‘The Red Flag In Philippines’ ction Shows Peasant} | Opposition to Rich Land Owners | By SAMUEL WIENMAN The rapidly mounting struggles of the peasantry, especially the ten- ant farmers and sharecroppers. of tne Philippine Islands under the | leadership of the Communist Parity against the landlords, money lend- | ers, tax-collectors and constabulary are confirmed in the latest Philip- | pines Herald, imperialist daily news- | paper published in Manila, to reach here. A dispatch from the province of Tarlac, dated July 28, reflects the intensity and the high level of the peasant movement throughout the islands. Appearing in the Philip- pines Herald under the heading | “Red Flag Raised By Tazlac Far- |mers” is the following account, which we quote in full: “A detachment of constabulary soldiers, headed by Lieutenant Liberato Littawa, were rushed to the town of Conception where members of the National Federation of Peasants recently raised red flags as a sign of discontent and opposition to the land owners of the town. The timely arrival of the Philippine Constabulary soldiers narrowly averted trouble. Red Flags in Fields ROOSEVELT’S NEW BOARD “The tenants of Concepcion who} |are members of the federation | headed by one Manahan held a} meeting on July 22 in which they | discussed their grievances against the ‘lords’ according to the) ‘constabulary investigation. In the! | same meeting they agreed to-mani- |fest their feelings by raising red flags. The situation took on a communistic aspect when early the next morning red flags were seen waving in the fields. “The investigation further re-| | vealed that unless their demands were heeded the tenants refused to work on the farms.” | New Fake Tax Law In the meantime Quezon, Roxas and Co., political tools of Wall St. imperialism and the native bour- geois-landlord exploiters, are exert- ing themeselves to the utmost in | their efforts to cripple the peasant revolts. In addition to their cus- tomary methods, including the con- |} ciliation boards, the constabulary | jand outlawing the vommunist Party, the latest maneuver of the Quezon gang is the introduction of a fake tax revision Jaw in the legis- | lature which promises “to relie’ e| many small landowners and farm- | ers in the provinces whose lands | are in danger of being confiscated | by the government for their failure | to meet their land tax obligations | This tax revision scheme is a | plain piece of empty demagogy. It) | is obvious that the millions of land- \less peasants, tenant farmers and | share-croppers, can gain nothing from any change in taxation. The | real purpose of the device is to re- duce the taxes on the giant Jand- | holdings; although the poor p2as- | ants, owning an average of three | acres or less, may be granted some tiny concession. Sically the Philippine peasant problem centers around the hunger for land. The ‘whelming major- ity of the neasants can solve their difficulties only by confiscating the j lands upon which they have spent | a life of toil. In this task, however, they have two enemies to combat, for Wall Street actively supports | |the landlords. The Communist | | Pa:ty of the Philippines fights on two fronts: against Yankee im- perialism and the National bour- geois-landlords. Japanese Push Drive in Press. Against USSR (Special to the Daily Worker) MOSCOW, Sept. 7 (By Wireless). ;—The unbridled anti-Sovict cam- | paign in the Japanese-Manchurian | press is becoming daily bolder in its ferocity, going to the extent of exposing the real plans and the in- | Spirers of the provocative war ma- | neuvers. The Harbin press, for instance, began to speak of the intention of jeertain Japanese-Manchuri: | circles to organize” the Chines | Eastern Railway. The newspapers | clearly intimate that it is a ques- tion ay discussing new measures by |the Japanese-Manchurian _ cizcles directed against Soviet citizens em- Ployed by the CAR. and against the rights of the U.S.S.R. under the tailroad agreement. Simultaneously, Japancse-Man- churian circles are utilizing the train wrecks on the Souther | Branch of th> C.E.R. a3 a means of | mieDsitying their anti-Soviet cam- | paign, The Harbin press started an un- | | disguised campaign of advocating | | the military occupation cf the C.E.R. by japanese armed forces. The semi-official organ of the Jap- anese milita ry. “Barbinskoye | Vremia,” writes: “The best. ue Of | the situation would b> if Jepanose | | detachments were to he pladed asa} cafeguerd to the entire line of the C.E.R.” Plan to Seize Railway Another Japanese newspaper, |“The Harbin Simbun,” frankly | speaks ef the necessity of occ |ing the CER. by the Ja military forces, insolently dec? “This is necessary for the seli- protection of the Japanese, and for the protection of the nhepps ness of vicicvs circumstances in the atiack en the train of the Southsrn | Branch of the C.E.R. While Jan- anes: ene ene authorities usv- |. verless t> doal swith | bandit: se this tim? cf he: moened, mainiy chicved by a Jonan-e- Petseh ent within two days alter ihe at i tacks The Most Burning Question--- | Unity of Action By BELA KUN Member of the Presidium of the Communist International ELA KUN ended the first installment of his series of articles on the united front yes- terday by citing that the Nazi papers in Ger- many were moved to fear by the united actions between French Communists and Socialists, The second installment of this series follows: * * * pe reaction on the part of Hitler fascism to the united front of the workers, which is developing against German fascism, is in itself enough to show that the Communist Parties which made proposals for unity of action to the Social-Democratic Parties acted cerzectly. The correctness of this step of the Communist Parties lies not only in the fact that they have repeated this step, despite the fact that after Hitler's advent to power, the Second Inter- national forbade the Social-Democratic Parties to organize joint actions with the Communists against Hitler fascism, (The Second International did this | despite the fact that the Communist Interna- tional in its appeal of March 5, 1933, recommended its sections to cease making attacks on Sozial- Democracy during the period of joint actions) Moreover, the importance of these proposals made by the Communist Parties to the leader of Social-Democratic Parties lies not only in the fact that Swiss Social-Democracy has once again proved that it prefers to maintain its class collaboration with the bourgeoisie rather than to establish the united front with the Communist workers; that the Labor Partycould not even answer the pro- posal for unity of action made to it; that the French Socialists made joint action ageinst fascism dependent upon a condition which constitutes a breach of workers’ democracy. C. P, WILL PRESS UNITY At the time of writing these lines, we do not yet know what decision will be taken by the Ad- ministrative Commission of the French Socialict Party on the basis of the reports of its delegates who negotiated with the represeniaiives of the Communist Party. We do not know which pres- sure will have a more powerful effect upon the Administrative Commission—the militant will of the working m who are pressing for unity of action, or the resistance of Frossard, Doroy and Reviere, who have rejected the proposal made by the Communist Party of France. No matter what the leaders of French Social-Democracy may decide, no matter what the leaders of the Swiss Social- Democracy have decided, no matter what the lead- ers of the Labor Party have keut quiet from their members—the Communist Parties will unchakebly continue and extend the struggie for the united front of the working class against fascism, against war, for the rescue of Thaelmann. Let the Social-Democratic leaders answer the proposals of the Communists for the formation of a@ joint front of struggle with such malicious words as were uscd by Swiss Social-Democracy; let them declare with malice and hatred that the struggle against the splitting of the working clas3 is a Com- munis mancuver—fer us Communisis, and also, we hope, for the great mass of workers in Social- Democratic and reformist organizations, the united front, of the working class, of action of the projctoricns, is and remains a ser‘ous raatter, a sacred cause. STRONGEST CHAMPIONS OF CAUST Little as we Communists are in render for one instent the political and organiz2- tionel independence of the Communict Part! litle os we deem it possible for there to be a union of the Communist International with the Sccend International, we ere nevertheless dele mined to fight with all our strength to secure unity of action of the proletariat against its c! enemies. Many Socic!-Dsmocratic workers, mom: bors of reformist trade unions and functionaries oi these orgenizctions did not understand this be- ferc; bub today at least, in face of the trom deus growin of the danger of fascism and war, they are coming to realize ever more and more clearly thet the Communists are Bo an. costacle ler in the way of establishing the unity of the working class, but that they are the strongest champions of this cause. The appeal for common action against fascism and the offensive of capital issued by the Com- munist International on March 5, 1953, had al- ready convinced many of the Social-Democratic workers and functionaries that the Communists are even disposed to make concessions in the in- | terests of eStablishing the united front of Commu- | nist and Sociai-Democratic workers against the bourgeoisie. We wish to declare openly and un- reservedly: The renunciation of polemics against the Social-Democratic Parties, during the period of | common struggles against the offensive of capital, against fascism and imperialist war, is a concession. CONCESSION TO STRENGTHEN FIGHT We are making this concession despite the fact that we are firmly convinced that our polemics against the supporters of class collaboration with the bourgeoisie aré not only well founded but that such polemics constitute an indispensable part of workers’ democracy, This workers’ democracy con- sists not least in the fact that the worker: members of one and the same class but holding different views—convince one another tn the strug- gle of ideas. Workers’ democracy denotes not only the tight, but also the du In return for this conce: nothing of the Social-Democratic Parties, but the enlisting of all workers in the common front of struggle against the common class enemy. We Communists will never, under any circum- stances, repudiate our principles, our tactics. We will never give our consent to the collaboration of the working class with its class enemy, the bour- geoisie. We were, are and always will be for the revolutionary overthrow of bourgeois rule in all its forms—whether faccist or bourgecis-democratic. We are for the unrestriciod power of the Z class, for the dictatorship of the proletariat, for Soviet power, which can only be set up by the use of proletarian force against bourgeois forces. y revo- lution, We have proved by the mple Soviet Union that only the dictatorship of the pro- letariat, only Soviet power can bring about the broadest democracy of all toilers and clear the way for Socialism, But to those workers who do not yet share our views cn all these questions of principle, we have always addresced the call: Struggle with us against the common class enemy, against the most immediate dangers which are threatening the proletariat. On Jan. 1, 1922, when the offensive of capital against the international working class set in, we addressed ourselves to proletarian men and women in all countzies with the following words: “You do not yet dare to struggle in the new way, you do not yet dare to sirugcle for power, for dictatorship, with arms in yeur hands. You do not yet dare to make the great attack on the citadels of werld roection. At least, then, rally together for the struggle for hare life, for the strugsie for peace. Relly for this struggie in a fighting front. Rally together as a proletarian class against the bourzeois class. Tear down the hartiers which have been sot up hety Take your places in the ranks, munist, Seciat-Democrat, Anarch i ist, for the struzgle ezainst the emerzency of ee houn, The Communit International has : | eaiied upon the werkers who ctond for latorship ef the proletaria: unite in indenendeni parti Tt dees net ta oy back one word ef what it has said in for the formstieon of indcpend Parties; it is convinced that every convince ever greater masses how been in all its conduct ond ie: everything wri i OR ond wor a ‘¢ for that which you all feel to goal.” fae Be eee U.S.S.R. Grain Harvest Far in Excess of 1935 w At the ing from Nerth (Speci! to the D=!ly Worker) MOSCOV, —By ee by 18,745,000 201 last year a: tl Sent. 7 (By wireless). 525,999 Acres of |i Sept 5 ed| Unemp'oysd? or 21 per more than at the| Builders! f date in 1933. same time, the sowing cf vinter stein is gradually jrocsd- | leent of the program having 1 opt. ‘Mme Sun Yat-Sen Urged To Come to U.S. NEW YORK. — Seven Chinese to South, 41 ver) Peace ad rkers’ organizations in this elty cate shit ye cenit he following cail> to ae |Medame Sun Yat-sen, Shanghzi, ROGET | Chine: Join the Red “Urze you come to America on, joccasion of Chicago Anti-war Con- of mutual conviction. | m on our part, we ask | = ee eT Hail Memory Of Jose Wong Leader of Chisene in Cuba Was Murdered by Machado in 1930 By Y. T. YOUNG |. Four years ago, Jose Wong, the leader of Chinese workers in Cuba and a member of the Central Come mittee of the Cuban Communist Party, was strangled to death in Havana jail. The murder was pree ecded by 2 secret conference bee tween the Kuomintang ambassador ; to Cuba and the officials of the Dee partmen® of the Interior of the Cuban government, showing how | closelyChiang Kai Shek and Mae |chado, as the agents of Ameg¢ican | imperialism, worked hand in in hunting down the revolutio: | By murdering Jose Wong, j |they murdered Mella and | Cuban working-class leaders, |lackeys hoped to stem the | Tevolutionary movement in | Bu‘, today, four years after death of Comrade Wong, the Ci masses, under the leadership of Communist Party, have not ‘ overthrown the bloody Machado re- |gime, but are fighting steadily for the establishment of workers’ and farmers’ rule. The voices demand- ing the sen‘ence of the assassins of the Wong case have become so loud that the Cuban authority was ‘forced to arrest a few of them ree cently. Opposition to Fascists The Chinese workers’ organiza- tions in Cuba, of which Jose Wong was one of the founders, have been able to give a deadly blow to the | attempt of Chiang Kai Shek to or- | ganize fascist “Blue Shirts” among | the Chinese abroad. Huang Whong |Shing, Chiang’s notorious agent, |was forced to hide himself and ready to get out of Cuba, on ac- count of the mass protest from the Chinese and native workers. This splendid victory gave great impetus to the Anti- Fascist movement, among the Chinese population, not |enly in Cuba, but in the United States well. | It must be emphasized that Jose Wong, by his devotion and self- sacrificing work, became a leader of the Cuban working class as a | whole. He played a leading role in the huge May Day demonstrations and strikes, especially ihe strike of 200,- 060 Cuban workers in March, 1930, Not long after he joined the Party, he was elected a member of the Central Committee. It is also sig- | nificant that he was arrested at a | comrade’s home where he was pre- aring for the celebration of tho | opening of the First Soviet Con- |gress of China. This again demon- strates how Wong unceasingly | fought for the defense of the Chi- | nese revolution, by actively partici- | pating in the class struggles in | Cuba. At the time when the Kuomintang | tang government has not yet been |so fully exposed and the Chinese Sovict movement had not yet becn as consolidated as it is today Wong continuously called upon the masses | to fight against every step of the |Nanking government to sell out China (for instance the American | silver lozn advanced to Chiang Kai ° Shek), and pointed out to the mercc3 thot only the Soviets can sayv> China. Ii is obvious that the lions who dared to defy his betrayal of the national interests of China, All over this continent, the Chi- nese workers are holding memorial i honor of Jose Wong. These mes’ must be powerful | protests agains: Chiang Kai Shex |and Mendieta, the butchers of Chi- | nese and Cuban peopics, as well as | against their master, American im- | perialism. It is imperative for the | workers in the U. S. to support these |ac ivitics as a sign of solidarity to | the oppressed masses in China and | | Cuba. Two American Aviators Get the Order of Lenin for Rescues in the Arctic of the | (Special ta the Daily Worker) Moscow, Sept. 7 (By wircless).— lyde Armistead and William j Le American airplane mechan- lies, were awarded the highest badge of honor given by the Soviet gov- ernment, the Order of Lenin, for their participation and operations in the rescue of the Chelyuskin Arc- tic. crew. : Armistead flew with the Soviet avia‘or, Levanevsky, and Lavery, with the Soviet aviator Slepnev. In a telk with press representatives Armistead and Levary said: “We cannot find words to express the gratitude and joy we felt when we |heard the government of the U. S. S. R. had given us the highest awere— he Order of Lenin.” ‘Waterways Agreement Completed by Soviets (Specicl to the Daily Wotker) MOSCOW, Sopt. 7 (By wireless). | Mier two months of negotiations jin Sakhalin between the Soviet | Amur River Navigation organization j | | and the Manchurien Harbin Steam- ship Co., a technical agreement has been signed regarding frontier rways along the Amur, Arguni nd Usuri rivers. The agrecmen! provides for joint preparation and upkeep of naviga- tion signs on the frontier rivers, and compulsion of ships of bo h sides io observe established navigation rules. Tho agreement signed in Saknalin is no’ of an interstate character and only touches on technical questions. Never heless, its signing has a cer- tain political significance. It shows geed-will on the Soviet side and egcin refu es the statement in the Japaness-Manchurian press that Soviet authoritics are seeking con- flicts en the Manchurian frontier, evading settlement of disputed | questions. larcss to help build broad movement against anancse imperialism in |U. S. on basis of your six point program,”