The Daily Worker Newspaper, February 22, 1929, Page 3

DAILY WORKER, NEW YORK, FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 1929 Page Three PARTY PRE-CONVENTION DISCUSSION SECTION Our Opposition and This is the first of two articles on the pre-convention issues before the Party for discussion. within a short time.) * Methods and Spirit of The Communist Party carries on | political discussions for the primary | purpose of self-clarification and self-orientation. This aim must de- | termine the methods and the spirit of the discussion. Lies, rumors, dis. tortions of facts and like methods (which may be unworthy tricks of a debater to score a point against his opponent) will not and cannot contribute to the clarification of any issue or to a healthy self-orienta- tion of the Party. * Viewed from this angle, some dis- cussion articles of our Opposition contributed nothing to a clearer un- derstanding of the Party’s tasks and problems. Some of these contribu- tions were monumental proofs of where unprincipled factionalism must inevitably lead. All sense of proportion is lost; opposition to leadership turns into opposition to the Party itself; under the guise of political attacks against the leader- ship, attacks are made against the Party itself in the language of its enemies; the Party is treated to dis- cussion contributions in the columns of its official organ which one could reasonably expect to find only in the columns of sheets like “The Mili- tant.” Two articles will illustrate the point, Discussion contributions like those of Comrades Pilgrim and Childs are unable to indict the lead- ership of the Party, but, on the con- trary, are indictments against the writers of the articles; the articles indicate the relative distances which divide the writers from the Party on the one hand and from the Cannon- ite enemies of the Party on the other. Such articles play into the hands of Cannon outside of the Party because they tend to under- The second will be published the Party Discussion. ‘The article by Pilgrim is the child of an anarchist mind which tries to hide its contempt for the very prin- ciple of leadership behind lying ru- mors, contemptible gossip and stud- ied character assassination, all off- shoots of the whispering campaign ith which an unprincipled Opposi- tion tries to prove its “bolshevik” qualities. The ariicle by Childs, on the other hand, is a pseudo-political discussion article, conceived in utter contempt for the truth, and presented in the certainly un-Communist spirit of a jilted lover, who destroys the beauty of his girl, rather than see her the sweetheart of another. Childs sneeringly tells us “what a rotten kind of a Party this is, anyhow,” and since facts do not bear out his contentions, he invents proofs. Such tactics are not born of loyalty to- ward and confidence in the Party, but of contempt and enmity. Says Childs: “The Party in Dis- trict 8 has not grown in the last year.” The fact is that, in spite of the moving of the National Office of cur Party from Chicago to New York, which took (conservatively) one hundred comrades out of the district, among them many most luable and capable organizers and agitators, the Convention member- ship figures in 1928 were 100 above those of 1927, which means en ap- proximate increase of membership by 200. Childs asserts: “The number of shop nuclei has decreased, the exist- ing shop nuclei function very poorly.” The facts are that at the time of the 1927 convention there was only one functioning shop nucleus in the the Party’s Tasks in the Light other one was in the process of for- mation against the bitter opposition of Childs and his friends. At the time of the present convention, there jare well-functioning shop nuclei in |the Harvester, the Northwestern | Railroad shops, the Western Electric Jestablishment, and the packing houses, with a number of new shop nuclei in other parts of the district, such as in Kenosha, Milwaukee, etc. clei do not take up neighborhood po- litical issues.” The fact is that the first act of the District Committee, elected in 1927, was an extensive campaign in membership meetings, functionaries’ meetings and through propaganda work in the units, to transform the politically dead units which under the leadership of Swabeck and his friend Childs had developed into mere ticket selling agencies, into real, politically functioning units of The darkest chapter in the story of the Opposition in the Party in District 8 is the miners’ campaign. If any proof were needed that cer- tain elements of the Opposition are working against the Party itself, their activities in the mining cam- paign would furnish that proof. The major activity of Swabeck, Rubicki, Winsberg and Chiids consisted in a systematic recruiting campaign among the miners against the lead- ership of the Party. Open recruit- ing work was carried on among the miners with the slogan, “Join the Party to clean out that rotten bunch cf leaders.” The financial difficulties of the Party in the campaign were used as a basis of propagenda against the Party. In the face of the greatest financial difficulties of the district, miners were propagandized against the Party and its leadership on the ground that, not John L. Lewis, but the Party and its rascally leaders are starving them. This propa- ganda, which is still carried on by Childs declares: “The street nu- | By MAX BEDACHT the Party. This campaign resulted in the arrangement of neighborhood meetings by the nuclei and in the taking up of the campaigns of the Party by the nuclei within the terri- tory assigned to them. This campaign is by no means ended. The transformation of the nuclei into political units is far from being completed. Much has yet to be dene and is still being done by the district; but the decisive point is that the campaign to politic the activities of the units was initi- jated and carried through by the Dis- |trict Committee, under the leader- |ship of the Central Committee, to overcome the political paralysis cre- jated in the nuclei under the leader- {ship of Swabeck-Childs-Maurer-Ru- ‘bieki. The Party, District 8 and the Miners’ Campaign. |basie approach of the renegade Can- jnon to the miners. ‘This policy of Childs and his friends has led to the inevitable result of the desertion of miners to Cannon. Cannon that |the leaders of our Party are a bunch jof rascals. That is what Rvbicki. |Childs and others have been telling \them all along. Is it any wonder that some miners go to Cannon? As against this black record of Childs and his friends, the misstate- |ments in Childs’ articles concerning |the miners’ campaign are of little significance. People who could carry on such anti-Party campaigns jemong ihe miners certainly will con- jsider it of very little importance if it should be proven that their state- ments are unadulterated lies. The \district mobilized (and mobilized | successfully) for the Pittsburgh con- |vention, under the slogans, “Organ- | |ize a New Miners’ Union,” “Elect |Delegates to the Pittsburgh Conven- tion.” Participation in the clections in the U. M. W. A. was expressly | Another example of Childs’ “Com- | munist” discussion method is con- tained in his presentation of the | Kenosha strike. Says Childs: “A leaflet was printed and sent out for distribution which told the workers that the strike was lost.” | The facts are as follows: The Party’s struggle against the reac- |tionary leadership of the full-fash- lioned hosiery workers’ strike in | Kenosha was carried on partly un- der the demand for mass picketing. The reactionary leadership ap- proached the manufacturer with a class collaboration proposal, prom- ising increased production if they would enter a contract with the union. Meantime the factory was raanned by strikebreakers, to almo its full capacity. Instead of organ- izing mass picketing, the reaction- ary leadership of Budenz proposed to solve the problem of the scabs by trying to prove to the boss that he would make more money by employ- ing union members. Under these conditions the policy of the Party had to be to im- press the strikers with the necessity of solving the problem of the scabs thru mass picketing, taking the scabs out of the factory. The Par- ty therefore proposed to the stri ers to save the strike by replacing the Budenz policy of collaboration with the bosses, with a policy of struggle against the bosses, with mass picketing and militant par cipation of the strikers in the strike. The Party pointed out in its leaf- lets that the policy of Budenz has led to the filling up of the factory with scabs. Our “full-fashioned Left winger of the type of Childs and Rubicki maintained and still maintain that pointing out to the strikers the fact that as a result of Budenz’ policy learning) that one cannot fight against the wrong policies of the reactionaries without proving to the workers the disastrous result of these wrong policies. Since the aim of the Party was to win the strik- ers for militant methods of strug- gle, it was necessary to prove to the workers that the methods of Budenz led to defeat. It is bad enough that it should be necessary to discuss with Childs and others the correctness of this poli but it becomes a tragedy if Child begins to peddle his childish “poli- cies” as the incarnation of Bolshe- vism and as proof of the Right wing line of the CEC. The Milwaukee Crimes. I suppose I have to be thankful to Childs that he lacked the cour- age to put into print what, at his instigation, is being peddled not only in the American Party but even in the International, concerning Be- dacht’s support of the candidacy of Victor L. Berger. This outrageous lie was voiced in my presence in New York by another famous “Left winger” in the ranks of Childs’ Op- position, by Comrade Gomez. After I told him that it was a lie, he prom- y ised not to repeat it, but he never- theless repeated it time he spoke. the very next Many mistakes were made in the execution of the correct policies of the district committee concerning the election campaign in Milwaukee. The healthy discussion of these mis- takes, however, is seriously hamp-! ered by the Cannonite policies of Childs and his friends of insisting on repeating the most unfounded lies against the Party concerning Party alliances with capitalist politicians, the candidacy of a company union organizer, and like inventions. This Childian propaganda is pure and simple mud-slinging—not __ only against the leadership of the Party, but against the Party itsélf. . | cessor. Majority of the Party has no rights except those graciously granted by the Opposition, Thus, when Com- rade Johnstone left the district, he appointed his successor. When this successor left the district, she ap- pointed her succe: When the or- ganizer of Section 5 left the district, she appointed her successor, When Comrade Winsburg decided to leave the office entrusted to her, she ap- pointed Steve Rubicki as her suc- All these Opposition family appointments were made without the knowledge or consent of the mem- bership or of the district leadership. The Opposition simply acted as a Party within the Party. And when the district committee pointed to its right and responsibili- ties in these matters, then the ille- gitimate machinations of the Oppo- sition were turned into “illegitimate” removals by the district. The volume | of noise against the district was usu- | ally trusted by the Opposition to make up for the utter lack of a case. Take for instance the “removal” of Gersh. Gersh never was section organizer and therefore could never have been removed, Childs complains that assignments of functionaries to shop nuclei and other Party units were made in an arbitrary manner. Yes, the district must admit serious errors concern- ing arbitrariness in the selection of District and Section representatives to the shop nuclei and other bodies. The Opposition vigorously demanded | the assignment of Giganti to the Harvester nucleus. In spite of the conviction of the district committee that this was wrong, it arbitrarily consented to the assignment to ap- pease the Opposition. Giganti had to be expelled from the Party as a Cannonite. The de- Opposition vigorously of the Pre-Convention Discussion . |teach Childs (if he were capable of] consistently maintained that the the better judgment of the DEC it agreed to the arbitrary assignment of John Edwards to work in the Pull- man district, John Edwards had to be expelled as a Cannonite. The Opposition vigorously opposed the reorganization of the absolutely im- potent Section Committee of Section 4 except if this reorganization was carried on on the basis of factional In spite of the District Com better judgment it agreed with the result that tre paralysis in the Section Committee coritinued and became a scandal in the Party. Another side of the story of demo cratic centralism and discipline is the fact that Opposition members of the District Committee like Rubicki, Fisher, and others, never, even for a moment, respected the discipline of theDistrict Committee, but at all times and everywhere represented the Opposition against the decisions of the committee of which they were members; and this at a time when there was inner peace throughout the Party. The article of Childs is a glaring example of the attitude of the Op- position in District 8. Not a shred of sense of responsibility, only lying and distortion of facts characterize Childs’ article. But this is no sur- prise to those who know the condi- tions prevailing in District 8 con- cerning the Opposition activities. The Opposition in District 8 is a party unto itself with the sole reason for existence of fighting and belit- |tling every decision and every act |of the Party. The article of Childs is merely another manifestation of the policy that the Opposition has followed in this District since the | last convention. This policy is one of rule or ruin, one of either taking the Party or destroying it. It is my conviction that even if they took it they would destroy it. That is why I fight against the destructive anti- Party tendencies of Childs and his proposed as a c i fter the | th ills re filled vith scabs manded the assignment of John Ed- A ; d mine the Party from within, city of Chicago (Harvester). An-|Childs and his friends, is now the 'Ditteburgh eavensioh ot aie | ia defeatiain, ie Pioneer ould! Our Opposition in District 8 has| wards to responsible work, Against | friends, and against the Opposition. EMERGENC FUND Mi h Chief Justice William H. Taft as-; FINN DOCK STRIKERS yumm | lcisted in bringing out the points in] HELSINGFORS, Finland (By : Y 1,000 WAIT HOURS Vtshandle German Farm —— (QURT FAVORS ise ers'iiriting ache esy oases og, d from Page 0 Bie; Joe Vi Re AS . ° ° questions of the attorney. |several thousand in number, who ‘ontinued from Page One ee 000) Vater oe 4 WE b Wh 1 B Ie l d | ‘The supreme court at today’s ses- | have been on strike against wage ford, N. H. eoaveseess 20,00 Collected by L. * Williams, T0 SHOVEL SNOW a over U e eng ale | SINCLAIR PLEA sion ruled that the department of the |cuts for five months, plan to con- Hungberm Finnish Labor So- Cleveland, Ohio--John Wil- | —_—_—_———_- | interior did not have the right to |tinue the strike until they win. Re- ciety, E. Weymouth, Mass. 10.00] liams, $1; J. Gruczolowski, | (Red Aid Press Service) {the inspector Dierks was fined 50) |stop the investigation of the Elk! markable solidarity has been main- Progressive Bakers Group, 50c; A. Gruezolowski, 50c; EHS | BERLIN, (By Mail).—A farm| marks and the merchant Dehlmann) Hills leases, another scandalous oil |tained by tho workers. aoett 237, Chicago, Ill.... 10.00 cere oes P. Cohen, $1; Fe Grey-Haired Workers \laborer named Schroeder stabbed ai ves alee fined 50 ae the cate WASHINGTON, Feb. 20.—The!deal during Harding’s sane i ae ; ie 5 Sec. 1, 6F, City .....0...++. 10.00 INEZIC, OVC ...+--seeeeee . x , | cattle owner named Kruse in a fight| Which were imposed were ridiculous! supreme court of the United States |tion. But the department has al-| | But every class struggle in s poli- Original Association of Rus- Collected by Mary Taitelman, Get 50 Cents an Hour | sna the latter died. At the trial of|and mean in reality an acquittal. |lent a sympathetic ear to the argu-|ready done this. baal aneale eet mere Cconmes aan oe ae ee Lede ae seeds La (Combined Frew: Page Ove) | Sehroeder the court concluded that | wn penis ote Mastin a Het Byte ‘rooklyn—J. Marinich, $1; insky, es lary Taitel- . od | Schroeder had received intolerable | yy». |ney for Harry F. Sinclair, sentenced | M. Swarowski, 50c; M. Me- man, 50c; S. Rubovsky, 50¢; his worn out shoes complained bit-| provocation from Kruse and sien. IE sa Tough World, |to three months in prison by a lower 7 1852 THE SAME ADDRESS OVER 75 YEARS See a hh ee ek a kab erated arcane, Msoun cnt eee ee fo me reer's) Kelloge Whines; His ont fot aero oe eee arama ne ei ly ee . 3 G y 3 oe 2 a imprisonment only. gendarme | v | ea ney weer 8.00 oar, ae pe pet R. a Efi | Ga ees ete ae | named Oberheide arrested Schroeder FakePeaceUnmasked | ue Topol Dome and Salt Creek oil | ETROPO LITAN SAVINGS BAN ene ay nit W. C. P. o amanowitz, 20c; x, Liman, ? y i and brought him back to Jaderber; rauds. | pa Cetin RCE PT eau Dies ne hea otis ths ee neers 5 a} aoe Pee ea ee fae the | where the fight had taken place. dl WASHINGTON, Feb. 21—Secre- | pean rue jake that | 4 ASSETS EXCEEDING $29,000,000 ey ‘or ection of the For- ction 1, 9F, N. x. ©. a : 3 nds were! On the way Oberheide mi died tary Kellogg took occasion on his/|the senate had transferred the cases | epenitx made. om ex before the gf eign-Born Workers, $4; W. Section 1, BF, N.Y. C. .....+ 3.60|thrust deep into the ragged pockets yi. Prisoner and when He ushandled formal receipt today of an honorary |to the courts by its resolution de- edema su ahereueyer na Goodis, $1; S. Skulski, $15 Collec ade pba Seok Cet te ri ee roped to Jaderberg he abandoned him to the| degree of doctor of laws from|nouncing the eases Sinclair got Last Quarterly Dividend paid jg 4 P. Kraus, $1; A. Lukashe- ye Nodes Be tembee 92; get the price of a few “eoffee-ands” |ivnch justice of the well-to-do| Georgetown University, petulantly irom Secretary of the Interior Fall, | Ga all Giasunta: frum! 45.06 4 V/, Y wich, 50c; C. Markowski, A. Nelson, $1; H. Spring, Soli “Been toutiof- as job bag?” friends of the stabbed man. A gen- ? complain of the attack on his and therefore could not question | to $7,500.00, at the rate of 270 D0. wee steseeceseee 8.00 ae ARR ee = eraled tee enene acked, B -°P® | darme inspector named Dierks also| Multilateral treaties, the “Kellogg | Sinclair, and that there was no evi | Oise Mandates dass wel a ba gg hen omre ans ose Shop Nucleus, N.¥.C.,. 3.00] “No, not much,” he said bitterly, |OPemly beat up the prisoner in the | Pacts” as merely a gesture. ene 1 ENOW Wee duet nous ee | Owe Sell A. B.A. Travelers Certified Checks York City—Asenbud, $1; eu noes rt, NES ae. er” [ROuty pen month’ Yon ‘eaten | presence of a crowd of applauding| He declared that he knew there senate Proposed to ask of Sinclair. | } 8. Kaukoff, $5; B. Shiri- si olngand 3, 0 A oa moilethina”” . & lynchers. Encouraged by the exam-| are some “who claim that the reer ae also claimed that Sinclair was Te Bier le 2 saecetess 7.00 ee pak See Begets The sutennment looked enviously ple of the gendarmes, a merchant has no value and that it is a | a ae He ree and | field, Mass.—t, ‘Bloom, $23 25e; G, Cohen, 25c; J. Brad- Bt ite: ten in front of the fine, “sr (named Debimann distinguished Mim | fore treaty actually isan attack| ose Krasnow, $1; Gilbin, $151. ley, 25c; A. Shaker, 60¢; |euess a few will be hired.” ome of /Keioiecg. prisoner. Schroeder” was bY American imperialism on Eng- = Goldstick, $1; Rose Pinko- $. Shakner, 75¢; G.E.Z., 2c; the late arrivals said, “but there’s | MIPICS® Prisoner, | Schroeder Was! ish, for it effectually substitutes | itz, 50c; N. Leavy, 50c; A, Levenstein, 25¢ ........ 3.00/no harm in waiting now we’re here.” terribly beaten and kicked. He lost| 15% 1 ie Hats ee fay ihe ane M. Lenneck, 50c.-.-'..-., 6.50 |Collected by ‘Max Levine, ha (he) finished’ tha ling \ extended [se ms Seon: teeth Bnd aictters Soil ety well controlled by Great| Cate oy a nici join A Ghhe No ML wena, from 11th to 12th Sts. While some from internal enty, pains, head- eet y well controlled by Grea | —A, Loo, $3; J. Bergman, 50c; C. Bromtsky, 50c; J. looked greedily at the warm-looking | 2°hes and copious bleeding from the Sela ¢ $8 seecececacceeseeeceeee 6.00] Brolnitsky, 50c; D. Scho- coats in ai alee a Gh: nae Bee trial of the brave Iynchers|¢,0%,alt the, clamses that stand face ; i 4 ner, a well-clad cop strolle ravi ynchers to face with the bourgeoisie toda cee ohn, 42; Elser, 20 Berlont, 80 ssrnssestcsees_ 8:00{tHe Hines to preserve “order.” “Come tOOk place in Oldenburg and the ft, mieten mage i sont foe a Mandih 25cs I Spitse, Collected by Anna Turgelsky, on, now, get over,” he growled as| gendarme Oberheide was acquitted, munist Manifesto). | Foc; Rati, 50c; X, 60c3 Bronx, N. Y.: T. Turgelsky, he prodded the men away from the iz Frank, 25c; N. Szabo, $1; $1; S. Turalbrose, $1; Friend store. They moved meekly away to | Awen, 25c; H., 25c; Ke- from Wilno . + 8.00|the slush of the sidewalks. It reczi, 50c ....0ci...- 6.20 | Collected by D. Stric! » Ne wouldn’t do to arouse the cop’s ire— & | Daily Worker Chapel, City. 6.00| Y. C.: J. Shachter, B’klyn., he might force them off the line. Sam Karras, Faleon, Idaho. 5.00) 50e; B. Alicof, B’klyn., 2be; Fifty cents was fifty cents. aSs enin | Collected by Goldie Lacher, B. Lynn, B’klyn., 25c; H. Brooklyn—S. Grros, $1; A. Kaplan, B’klyn, 25¢; W. BRITISH ELECTRIC MERGER. Waeber, 50c; A. Stein, 50c; Weinberg, 25c; H. Donarf, LONDON, (By Mail).—Two of of the Sarah, $1; J. Ancher, 25c; 25c; B. Podolsky, 26¢ ...... 2.00|the largest manufacturers of indus- B. Weinstein, 25¢; S. Gor- Collected by L. Donk, Unit 3, ai Sect foie eae ec o don, $1; A. Wolk, 50c; S4, N. Y. C.: A. Resnick, rs, Inc., and Lawrence and Scott, 6TH N ATION AL CONVENTION Weirbed, 25c. ........... 5.25] $1; N. Feinstein, 25¢; 0. Ltd., have merged. Many workers VVvVVVTVVY J. B. Weilzenbach, Wolf Quiros, 50c; P. Duanos, 25c; will be laid off. Point, Montana -. 5.00} E, Budanvicnte, 25c; J. 5 OS of the Collected by F. E. Mauritz, Reges, 25c; G. Boresoff, irl plied pe R pp ilinett D agi pend Bridge, Oregon—F. W. «eo + 2.75| (Communist Manifesto). WORKERS (Communist) PARTY Mauritz, $2; Mrs. F. E. Section 1, 7F, N. ¥. C. . 2.50 Mauritz, $1.50; F. E. Mau- L, Marshall, Cleveland, 0..... 1.00 ; 5 OF AMERICA ritz, $1.50 ..........-++- 5.00 | Collected by Comrade Wagner, Section 1, Dreazen, City .... 1.00 : | 1, A. C. Club, Bayonne,N.J. 5.00] Bronx, N. Y.: I. Yarock, 25c; ‘eccjenb ae 1, Section 2, a e | ected by Einar Peterson, i e a joston, Mass. ............ 1, 5 ane: Gacch $i: Ca phiorabeatad ope lg Alfred R. Dearden, New Phila- rida ve arc ] HAYWOOD S Bob Roch, $1; T. Bjark, $1; pate am seg 125 | oC ehiss Ohio 1.00 "9 Einar Peterson, $1 ...... 4.00 vel, seeegeoe -25!'W, Cherry, Bronx ~ 1.00 99 Sent in by Virginia Arnott, Section 3, Executive Commit- L, Muaritza, City . 1.00 NEW ST AR Cc ASINO Palo Alto, Calif—Palo Al- tee, New York City ...... 1.36/M- Arigline, City . ty (EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS TO REPUR- to Redwood Nucleus, $2.50; Section 1, S. Weisberg, City.. 1.00] 5° Ws sg “Olympia Wed tton East 107th St., near Park Ave. LISH BY SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT G. Soto, 50c; B. Higrierra, Section 1, Thomas, City ..... 1.00] Agron P, Mordcheles, Boston 1.00 WITH THE INTERN, PUBLISHERS) Br, 229, W.G.D.B.G., Danbury, vvvvvvVvVvvVvvVN ‘ 9 Conn. oe eees SECOND MEMORIAL OF THE AN ‘DAILY’ SURVIVE? ||oxvsi='* | © | |M. Shapiro, City . DEATH OF C. E. RUTHENBERG 'HAT absorbing story of W. Berger, City . (July 9, 1882—March 2, 1927) ; ie ae halle by one . M ay iY H. Kemel, City .. who has a distinct place in the ‘unds Vital if Our Press ts to Live pe a oo cs Ee rr rae rf is i His life was devoted to a relent- Respond immediately to the appeal of the Daily SUBSCRIBE NOW TO First Showing of New Russian Film START READING THESE less fight against capitalism Worker for aid in its present crisis. The Communist and The “RUSSIA IN 1928” MEMOIRS TODAY! — 4nd for the emancipation of : j Communist International ~ IN THE 4 The Daily Worker, 26-28 Union Square, New York. > Nationally Known Communist Leaders ye ‘Sex: Woikes ; = wrvvwvrwrvvwrrVv vey ya ‘After reading the appeal for aid in the Daily Worker I am send- Each $2.00 per year Will Speak Baily ve Dee aes in ow ene ; NI R it: ing yeu the enclosed amount, $....... ied Seth adits ts Comb. Offer: Both for $3.00 26 UNION SQUARE, New York City SHOPMATE!—IF YOU LIVE OUT- Name . LPG TRE Ep ADT IY ARCADE SME SE RRC RUT ECOG << —ADMISSION 50¢ ee AC ae vecenee SIDE NEW YORK — SUBSCRIBE! Address LEA HAN CVECITNY MENTS OTT Oe ees nor i —, $6.00 rer year Buy Your Tickets at District Office; Workers Y | ‘or six months . . i its “y ” Center, or at National Office, 43 E. 125th St. Fea of Cophtah ada will be published in the “Daily” without Workers Library Publishers ’ ’ . 35 East 125th St., New York City BSE NCEP SE rae