The Daily Worker Newspaper, October 13, 1926, Page 6

rite tiesranmao THE DAILY WORKER Sit THE DAILY WORKER Published by the DAILY WORKER PUBLISHING CO. 1113 W. Washington Blvd., Chicago, Ill, Phone Monroe 4712 SUBSCRIPTION RATES i] By mail (in Chicago only): By mall (outside of Chicago): $8.00 per year $4.50 six months $6.00 per year $3.50 six months $2,50 three months $2.00 three months Address all mail and make out checks to THE DAILY WORKER, 1113 W. Washington Blvd., Chicago, Ill, J. LOUIS +DAHL ) WILLIAM F, D NE (¢ MORITZ J. LOEB..... Editors .Business Manager Entered as second-class mail September 21, 1923, at the post-office at Chi- cago, Il., under the act of March 3, 1879. Advertising rates on application, _ The «y” Gets Away With Marder Again Class By A, LOSOVSKY, » (Secretary of the Red International of Labor Unions.) Ww" folks in Soviet Russia have what is a plainly distorted con- ception of class solidarity—at any rate what the British Trade «Union Congress General Council delegation | said at the last meeting in Berlin of | the Anglo-Russian Committee amount- ed to that. The Soviet Central Coun- |cil of Trade Unions’ delegation’s pro- | posal for organizing joint assistance |for the miners out on strike was pick- | ed to shreds on the pretext that it was | tantamount to interfering in Britain’s domestic matters, extend aid in time to the strike is put So the effort to . ’ : % re down as mere interference. When the boys who weren’t obliged to make their permanent ‘Well, ‘Wuat ‘about réfuaine to: helo? home there came back from Flanders they added to their own cuss-| sn that interfering in the struggle, ing voeabt from the sailors and heaped the entire collection on the Y. M. C. A. | » stories of the graft and corruption of this great christian organ- | ion feeding its treasury on the gory pennies of the lads in the| uvade never got to be literature and by now has been all but | otten except by the unfortunates who had to pay) 25 cents for a “free” package of Camels in France. But the Y. M. C. A. was only one of the thousands of war pro- | fiteers. If its extortions of doughboys’ money had been allowed to | become a nation-wide scandal as the iniquity of its operations cer- | tainly warranted, there would have been other and more powerful extortionists also exposed to the searchlight. It was all quieted down. Then too, the Y. M. C. A. is too valuable an organization to the profiteers to be exposed to the risk of losing its efficacy as a tool of the bosses. And if anyone doubts that the Y. M. C. A. is such a tool —and that with a vengeance—they need only look to Detroit. The simple recitation of the facts tells the story adequately enough. An invitation extended to President Green of the American Federation of Labor in conyention in Detroit to address a meet- ing at one of the “Y” buildings was cancelled at the last minute. There were no bones made about the reason. Green was frankly told that the cancellation was made because if he spoke in the building it would endanger the prospects of a fund the Y. M. C. A. was raising among Detroit employers. The secretary of the Detroit Y. ry a tew choice morsels they picked up on the boats |only the wrong way about? | favorably than otherwise regarded the | M. C. A. seemed unashamed to give the following figure of con- tributions to substantiate his story: Henry Ford, $750,000; Edsel Ford, $750,000. The Fisher Brothers (Fisher Body Co), $500,000. 8 the “Y” secretary in Detroit, Van Dusen, is general manager, $ And some more, all large open shop employers. It isn’t necessary to say another word about this organization that psychologizes workers in return for millions from the bosses. The Fords and the Fishers have learned that it is worth millions to take the tar out of their slaves. The two millions that these two bosses alone gave was a contribution, not so much to the Y. M. C. A., as to the open shop. The hard-boiled bosses of Detroit, thru their creature, the Y. M. «. A., have issued a. challenge to the organized labor movement | that can be met only by an energetic campaign to unionize every | big plant in the city. Lots of Room at the Top <resge, five a ten cent store magnate, of whose business | rpape, Ave and ten . 500,000. Facts what that “policy” is if we are | | -enty-two-vear- of James A. Stillman, well known | pours thru the windows into the room | The twenty-two-yeag-old son of James ie scheduled to /22d myriads of dust particles dance for other pursuits besides his banking activities, marry an eighteen-year-old domestic servant by the 2.7% of Lena | Wilson. This happy denouement to an acquaintance extending over a On the visitors’ bench two people are |_ dying senile voi decade seems to give the lie to the theory that opportunities for financial, social or any of the common concepts of success have faded out of the American picture. It is to be regretted that when the great American public should have such cause for rejoicing that “Peaches” Browning, the sixteen- year-old go-getter who married the 57-year-old real estate magnate should quit her husband’s bed and board, even tho she continues to use her purchase-on-credit privilege in the department stores at his expense. This mars the idyllic picture of American democracy painted by the young Stillman and his plebian fiance. To those of you who are weak and of little fatth, we say:. Don’t give up! Brains count. There is always room for the worthy at the top. Big corporations have several jobs commanding big money stowed away for the big-capacity executive. And there are scores of American millionaires ready to fall for youth and beanty, even tho they fall hard at times. comes along? velopes, may read of Lena Wilson’s luck with envy: But instead of asking for more pay and laying down on the job, they should be} blind -to the clock, work the joints of their fingers and only leave the shop when the boss calls in the police to eject them. In this way | the boss would become richer and who knows but he may have a 3ut does it matter, provided the money | Millions of American working girls, existing on slack pay en-| | wea’ Tt the help we are extending is strengthen- ing the forces and militancy of the miners, then a’ refusal to give that help is surely strengthening the ene- mies of the working class. Taking that for granted, then both giving help and refusing help means inter- fering in Britain's domestic affairs, with the difference that in ohe case the interference is in the interests of our class, and im the other in the in- terests of the foe of ov class. See however, twisted notions on what class, sol- idarity is and are poking our noses | into other people’s business, accord- ing to the competent views of both the Right and so-called Left Leaders fon the General Council, there is noth- ing else for it but to follow the exam- Dle of those whose actions don't draw any objections of that sort from the Council. To judge by the fact that up to now the General Council and its leading lights have kept silence and rather tactics of the Amsterdam and Miners’ Internationals during the strike, the leaders of the Trade Union Congress are seemingly in agreement with the policy of their International. That means we must ascertain ex- to understand. “class. solidarity a la Amsterdam.” Solidarity a la ANTEON: what {s the particular brand of class solidarity the Gen- eral Council regards so favorably? Class solidarity to the Amsterdamers is to have a resolution of sympathy a- dopted when a strike is declared, then resolution sat on, and a beginning made with helping the strikers only after they are at the last gasp, for unless they haye been starved into it they will mever realize all the charms of Amsterdam class solidarity, ‘When once the strikers have come to the limit of their resources, have lost everything they have, and their wives and children are starving, an appearance must be made on the | Scene, another resolution passed, more |Support promised and the question again deferred for another month. we have rather | HOULD the strikers prove stubborn | and it is not known for what reas- [ons they still keep on striking, yet an- jother resolution must be taken, one- |fourth of a farthing for every striker being meantime sent, whilst holding on to all the money in.the funds of the |International and its sections for | “breeding” purposes, though not ad- | verse to providing those in need with ja loan if required. | But to give that loan a real business | like look, to make it. look like a solid |deal, instead of smelling like Mus- | covite intermeddling in other's affairs, (a certain percentage has to be paid on the money offered.., Of course, a | whacking good pergentage must be \tried for, seeing that. loans are not granted just for the fun of the thing, at least not at the rate of interest that it could have been got at from a bour- geoils bank. HAT is exactly how the Amsterdam International and the Miners’ In- ternational have been acting during the whole of the British miners’ strike. When the TUC General Council—the same that refused to accept the “Red” gold—applied to the Amsterdam In- ternational for financial assistance the latter agreed to arrange a-loan at 4% percent, although it hadn't lifted a finger throughout the strike to help | the miners. But whilst the Amsterdam Inter- national was arranging the rate of in- terest, separate sections of the In- ternational were of ‘the view that it was exactly the proper moment to make just. a little bit out of their British colleagues (wht one and the same Interfiational!). The General Federation of German Trade Unions demanded 10% from the Brit- ishers! LL, fairly lengthy negotiations took place between London and Berlin, as they say in diplomatic cir- cles, Mr. Purcell, President of the IFTU, participating, as to precisely what rate of interest might be asked as the price of class solidarity, When the RILU stated in one of its appeals that the German reformists were asking 10%, Leipart, President of the General Federation of German Trade Unions, lost his head and sent in his “denial” to the press. It reads: “By agreement between Amsterdam and London 41% has been fixed on.” Now the social democratic press is kicking up a big row about the RILU’s statement having been a pire fabri- cation, and so on and so forth. B= there is just a couple of points . We would like to note in regard to Leipart’s justification. Let us call the President of the IFTU, and a member of the General Council, Purcell, to witness; it was ,hke who conducted these negotiations, As President of the International where class solidari- ty 1s quoted at 414%, Purcell stated in an interview given in Berlin on August 28th: “The GFGTU agreed to grant a Joan at 4% only after the British trade unfons unconditionally turned down the previous and far worse conditions brought forward by the Federation.” HERE'S the very person who ne- gotiated with the German reform- ists telling us the Germans imposed “far worse conditions” while the Presi- dent of the GFGTU informs us the rate of interest was fixed on by the Amsterdam International and that it doesn’t amount to more than £4 10s. on every £100. ‘Who are we to believe? In this case we believe the President of the Amsterdam International who, on be- half of the British unions, did not agree to the “far worse conditions.” Then the denial brought forward by the Vice-President of the IFTU is in turn denied by the President of the same International. UT just let us suppose for a minute that Leipart is right, that the Am- sterdam International (where they’ve sterdam elong to the }got experts on financial operations all “His Name Is Not In the List” By MICHAEL SZUBOTZKY. BARRIER, divides the room into two unequal parts. There is a kind of a booking office like in a bank. ; Behind the trellis there ts the lieuten: | ant— the chief police officer and two | others, his assistants. It is already noon time. The sun joyfully. A powerful, stoutly built gendarm is sleeping on a chair near the door. sitting—an old man and his wife. They whisper continuously and their whispering sounds like the humming | of a big, frightened fly. Now a door is opened in the corri- | dor, the gendarm gets up in a hurry, salutes. The police officer enters the room and sits down behind the trel- lis. He is still a young man. His su. periors keép their eyes on him, they | are obedient to him. Therefore, he t» always in a good mood, therefore he speaks so abruptly, therefore his movements are always so determin ed. ~ When he passes his hand over his moustache, he has the air of a field marshal before battle. And the police officer just now passes his hand over his moustache and says ab: ruptly: “Anything on?” The old grey haired Jew approach- es the trellis, supporting himself on his stick. His long beard trembles with every step. The woman follows him hesitatingly—she, too, is old and k. The old man looks at the inspector few sons that might fall in love with one of his father’s female em- | with his red eyes and murmurs some- Why not join a union? The Crisis in the Cotton Area ployes. Coolidge is not going to take any action to relieve the cotton | growers of the south, large numbers of whom have been bankrupted | by the toboggan slide which eotton, prices took the other day. As is | thing which is incomprehensible. “Louder!” says the police officer. Suddenly the rough, old voice of the man breaks through: “My son, my son!” Then again follows an hensible murmur. “I went to the chief incompre and he inevitable it is the small grower who has a few bales to market and |S4¥8 his name is not in the lists who depends upon the proceeds for his year’s livelihood, that is hit} the hardest. tents himself with the appointment of a committee and the announce- | Wheat does that mean, lists, when they have thémselves arrested him and taken him away from home las Southern congressmen have asked for a special session of con- night? No , pvise ways of ting the emergency, but Coolidge con- lists gress to devise ways’ of meeting th oreo s trict town and ask fn the prison there he is not in the T should go to the dis- Wherefrom does Roshkel take ment that the federal reserve board has money to loan to the cot- tye money to travel to the district ton growers. The contempt » yovernmel the farmers ig an outstand- - The contempt of the government for is icin Roskkel ie Saban iietota’. ing feature of the Coolidge administration but not exclusively its own, The Wall Street inte ‘ : Again lasts ests which control American govern- | police |town? "His wife sells her last dress The prison director says, I should go to the there I would. hear ment are not moved to pity by the distress of agricultural com- about everything.” munities. They see in these emergencies only a further opportunity for extending their control of natural resources by loans and | mortgages on land. | That is-why in eve that there is money the; agricultural crisis the farmers are told can borrow. | What the working farmer needs. is not more loans at exorbitant | interest rates but a moratorinm on loans already made and which | total, according to reliable estimates, more than $9,500,000—a | “Knough,” says the police officer, “Shut up.” He opens a big book and says with importance; “First name?” “Froim, he is called Froitt.” « “Father's name?” “Velvel,” “Family name?’ “Roshkel.” burden under which the American farmers are staggering and which I, ae sna bigesd ara i pagea— fi “en agric’ ‘ Hit ts a big an y a: makes any real solution of the agricultural exisiggimpossible unless | O14 Roshkel Gatchen ta shiie clot the farmers are relieved from the continuous,¢ action of the Wall ,., ) am usurers, ] % Pa tg if he, too, lotiked for the name ot | bis son in this terrible book, But ola Roshkel can only see the back of thy book. His wife is behind him, he eyes are turned down, her lips whis- per- without interruption: “My God, my God. . , .” “Roshkel. ... Roshkel .. .” | glides over the lines. jes the book and says: | fist and grins. thru the sun _beai , |courtyard sounds a od voice. Now ing: | “Is he dead?” The officer moves his chair and gets up. ps “Enough,” he says. “Froim Rosh- kel is not in the lists’ We do not know where he is, but we know that he is a scoundrel and’a friend of the Bolsheviks. Go, old Jew, if you do not want some accident to happen.” |. The old man turns away, but now his wife appears behind his back. She |80es to the trellis, her hands grips it ‘and she screams -with a piercing |voice of terror: “Give me my son back, gendarm! it have seen your lips read his name in this book! Froim! Froim! Froim! Gendarm, where is my son?” Her hands pierce through the trel- lis as if she wanted to take the book and to read the horrible truth about her son, that truth which her mother heart verified with every stroke. The officer turns his back to the woman. He still has.the air of a field marshal before battle. “Take them away, junds abruptly. The gendarm rusheg at the woman. Outside, on the stairs dn the court- yard they sit down—father and moth- er: on $i “Do not howl, you Jews,” says the gendarm after a moment . . . He grins, “Don't howl,” he “If you dish me up @ good meal, I will tell. you what happened to. your son.” The old man ti to get up, but he does not succeed, His wife jumps up and looks into the,face of the gen- darm, “Does he live? “All that I will you in detail,” replied the gendarm indefinitely. “Where do you liye? In the inn? Well, it is settled then, as soon as iny service ends, I will be there . . .”* The woman cries and murmurs, The father has suceeded in getting up, he bows to the gendarm and Says: “Please, do us the honor, Mr. Vice- Inspector,” “Well, but dish up decently, old rascal, and see to it that there is enough*to drink,” says the gendarm going away, ( she dead?” Mm, HE dripping candle, flarin ens dark shade The shadows move from the background of the the inn and ap) {8 surrounded by with chicken bones, me 4 The polished finger nal of the officer Then he clos- “Jew, your son is not in the lists.” A silence of tension spreads in the \room. The gendarm coughs into his The dust is dancing and from the asks, whisper- and entangles his beams in the battle- shadows, The prison walls, alone, Frightened soldiers whisper: haps, The drunken gendarm knocks on the table with his hairy fist so that the empty bottles and glasses jump in the air with a clinking sound. He howls: “We will drive the Bolshevik pesti- lence from the country! Do you un- derstand, you > a ore He curses, getting more and more excited and continues his tale: “You see these hands? “With these hands of mine I treated your mangy offspring! The police officer did it with his revolver handle, but I prefer the fist. I could be officer myself! The Jew screamed: Father, mother, father—but he was a Bolshevik.” ‘The old Jew covered his head with his hands and moved his body too and fro without a sound. His wife ceased His wife ceased to cry, her eyes dry and frightened fully large. The gen- darm is drinking the last remnants, he is angry that there is not more to drink. H speaks now in a low voice and with visible enjoyment: “In the morning he asked again for something to drink, but he did not get it. The officer gave him a docu- ment and asked him to sign, but the dirty Jew refused to, and the officer was like mad... .” “Where was my son buried?” asks He suddenly regrets that he has talked so/much—his small eyes take on an expression of animal-like fear. He gets up, takes his revolver and goes. At the door he stops and says whispering: “If you dare to tell anybody a single word, then... .” A powerful, hairy fist completes the sentence, Iv. i baie night begins—cool and silent. A tired moon rises above the town ments of the old fortress, now a prison. The guards on the walls com- municate with each other by short calls, There is dead silence, Human Supported on his stick, old Roshkel and his wife appear. They are not “The ‘Defensive’ always buries its victims near the prison,” says the guard. The old couple creep around the prison walls... . Here, perhaps he under their very feet lies the red- haired Froim—their beloved son, The lps of old Roshkel move with- out a sound—a Jewish prayer per- Finally the moon succeeds in free- ing itself from the battlements of the fortress, He rises quickly into th endless blue of the sky. right!) fixed on 414%, and that as a disciplined section of the Internation- al when it comes to getting some- thing for nothing there's no mistake about their discipline!—the Germans gave the money in conformity with the instructions of their International, Let us suppose, further, that Lelpart is as itocent in this business as the Virgin’ Mary herself; yet the fact re- mains that, under the high patronage of the Amsterdam International, the All China Federation of Labour Unions is going to get interest from the British Workers together with whom \it is in the one International; as is usually done fn all proper bank- ing operations, pees ae Bo if the matter is to be regarded from such a financial standpoint what does the International exist for? Maybe to do away with haphazard methods in financial] and banking op- erations and to establish yniformity in the matter of rates of interest? Such it seems are the functions of an International. Apparently that is the ideal International, in the opinion of the General Council, that is deserving of proper respect because it does not interfere in Britain's’ internal affairs, and if it does then only ‘to extract the same rate of interest from the pockets of the British workers that is regard- ed as correct in “good society.” ELATIONS Ifke that between the International and its sections, and the sections of the same interna- tional, are more, like the relations that exist between brokers and members of the Stock Hxchange; though in this case they go one better by quoting class solidarity, of all things! Right to the last half percent. T goes without saying we could never rise to such heights of sol- idarity. That is why the General Council. representatives are so upset at the behavior of the Soviet CCTU and are protesting against our tactics. The Council prefers solidarity a la Amsterdam to solidarity as Moscow sees it. Well, that is its lookout; butswe do not doubt that the broad working masses of Britain will put the true value on the words of the Am- sterdam and Berlin money-changers and will understand from this practi- cal example the difference between Moscow and Amsterdam. 4 Letters from Our F Readers © ‘A Bit of News. . On Saturday, Sept. 25, in the Chi- cago Tribune was an item on the first page, as follows: Noted Vientiese Biologist, Unsung at “Home, Kills Self. ~ VIENNA, — The body of Dr. Paul Kammerer, noted Vie: © biologist, | Who in recent ‘years had toured Amer- ica twice, was'found today on Schnee- berg mount near Vienna, where he had committed suicide. with a re- volver. The cause is believed to have been depression (due to the fact that, unhonored in his beloved home city, Vienna, he was forced to gain a liveli- | hood elsewhere, I heard. Dr. Kammerer lecture at Sinai Temple about two years ago, and considered him a most remark- able expert scientist. It was a red- letter day in my life. He promulgated a theory of heredity which directly opposed the August Weismann school of thought, and hence was very un- welcome to orthodox science, The late Luther Burbank agreed with him thoroughly, having discovered the truth of this viewpoint in his work as a wizard of plant life. ‘Also Caspar Redfield, of Chicago, has worked out the/ proposition from another angle. the mother. The gendarm answers with untruth in his voice: “I do not know.” Scientists sneered and were intolerant of his views for years, and thus liter- ally hounded him to death. es Nevertheless many. Tecognized_ him as one of the greatest, if not the great: est, biologist of present day Europe. His contention and the theory he Proved was that “acquired character- istics are inherited.” This the old school of Biologists’ decidedly deny. Christian bigots hurried the death ot Burbank, the medical trust persecuted Dr, Albert Abrams, ‘of electronic diag- nosis fame, and helped ‘greatly to have a third victim of scientists them- selves. sb Capitalism 1g a friénd of science so long as it does not interfere with priv-. ate profits. ee a Martha A. ‘Biegler, si Chicago. Tomsky. . Dear Worker Comrades: Your letter with bundles came to hand. I was much pleased to read of efforts being made by the army of workers in the movement, Tomsky’s declaration on the British government's refusal of a permit to the Russian delegates to seats in the T. U. C, sure ts a masterpiece, and throws the white light on the insin- cerity and ;hypocrisy of Britain's leaders in the labor ‘movement and the savagery of Britain's ruling ‘cl Perhaps it will be the nieans of ce: menting the file in closer lidarity of the rank and r bonds and in uncovering all the traitors, and weeding them out of the movement for good and winning the next struggle by a more careful planning, which will make the defeat not all in vain. ate An this state we have the spectacle of an ex- secr of labor making an issue of prohibition of liquors, and the ized man, narrative, “God made man to his own image and likeness,” but it is usually the reverse: “Man made God accord- ing to his This ideali and architect and produces the world, forming the various species of plants and animals like a modeler, govern- ing the world like a wise an : powerful monarch, and, at the judgment,” rewarding the good and punishing the wicked like a rigorous Judge. Tho childish conceptions of this extramundane God, who is set over against the world as an inde- Pendent being, the personal creator, |maintainer, and ruler of all thin; ‘re quite Incompatible with the ad. vanced science of the nineteenth cen- tury, especially with its two greatest, triumphs, the law of substance and the law of Monistic evolution, bring about his death; and now we | ~ Brst Haecke on“Last Words on Evolution” (Continued from previous issue) When we look at the matter impar- tally in the light of pure reason, the belief ‘in immortality is wholly incon- sistent with the facts of evolution and of physiology. The ontogenetic dog- ma of the older church, that the soul is introduced into the soulless body at: a particular moment of its em- bryonic “development, is just as ab- surd as the phylogenetic dogma of the most “modern Jesuits, that the divine spirit was breathed into the frame-of an anthropoid ape at a cer- tain period (in the Tertiary period), and so converted it into an immorta soul. We may examine and test thi belief as we will, we can find in i nothing but a piece of mystic supei stition. It is maintained solely by the gréat power of tradition and the Support of conservative governments, the leaders of which have no per- sonal belief in these “revelations,” but cling to the practical conviction fthat throne and altar must support each other. They unfortunately over- look the circumstance that the throne is apt to become merely thé footstool to the altar, and that the church ex- Ploits the state for its own, not the state’s, good, We learn further, from the history of this dogma, that the belief in im- mortality did not find its way into science until a’ comparatively late date. It is not found in the great Monistic. natural philosophers who, six centuries before the time of Christ, evinced a profound insight into the real-nature of the world, It ts not found in Democritus and Empe- docles, in Seneca and Lucretius Carus. It is not found in the older oriental religions, Buddhism, the ancient re ligion of the Chinese, or Confician- ism; in fact, there is no Fetes of individual persistence after death in the Pentateuch or the earlier books of the Old Testament (which were written before the Babylonian exile), It was. Plato and his pupil, Aristotle, that found a place for it in their dual- istic metaphysics; and its agreement with the Christian and Mohammedan teaching secured for it a very wide spread acceptance, Another psychological dogma, the belief in man’s free-will, is equally Inconsistent with the truth of evolu: tion. Modern physiology shows clearly that the will is never really free in man or in the animal, but letermined by the organization of the brain; this in turn ‘is its individual character by the laws of heredity and, the influence of the environment. 1 is only because: the apparent freedom of the will has such a great practical Significance.in the province of re- ligion, morality, sociology, and law, that it still forms the subject of the: most contradictory claims. Theoreti- cally, determinism, or the doctrine of the fecessary character of our voli- tions, was established long ago. With the belief in the absolute free- dom of the will and the Dersona] im- mortality of the soul is associated, in the minds of many highly educated people, a third article of faith, the belief in a personal God. It is well known that this belief, often wrongly * represented as an indispensable foun- dation of religion, assumes the most widely varied shapes. As° @ rule, however, it is an open or covert an- thropomorphism. God is conceived as the “supreme being,” but turns out, on closer examination, to be an ideal. According to the Mosaic own image and likeness.” zed man becomes creator “last (To Be Continued.) _ working man, as only the wealthy classes can afford to buy it, and as for the latter, he keeps very silent about where his millionaire friends Bet it to spend. He must his wealthy friends by any demands of the working class, too embarrassing should he slip into a seat beside them. Hence the work- ers’ needs are not considered by the great ex-secretary, and we have a conspiracy of silence, instead of tho important TheAront pages of all the capitalistic papers) are smeared by accounts of prizefights, beauty shows (which only he can attend); not offend It would be issues being "discussed, baseball, football « and contests. The rich = man’s with purpose of keeph 1 thinking of 4 series, while the grand the working class goog na for more literature when Xd permanently, r Dy Nauty Glo, Pa,