The Daily Worker Newspaper, October 4, 1925, Page 4

| | \ } casualty list not altogether one-sided. But what we wish to bring political resolutions |ganize the Central Committee on the | foreseeing the possibilities of majority of the politbureau and. thi made the proposal to the Parity Com#| secretariat was secured for the Ruth- mission to settle the most touchy ques#| enberg group and instead of’ Bittel- tome by some comrades aboug} tions of the individyal composition of] map, Cannon was elected to the the membership meeting of the New| the Central Committee. and the Dis4} poMtbureau and the secretariat for the York organization, September 25,4 trict Committees, They agreed tol Foster grow t us try to analyze the above cited facts, WThis report shows that Comrade form a minority in the Central Com- The first thing one is impressed speech, sometimes mittee altho the result of the elec- ——=#| quoted my words spoken in the tions was not yet clear. By these x means they hoped to avoid a split.| with is that the party has gone thru The proposal wag accepted by the/a very severe crisis and that it had Parity Commission. The number of| sufficient strength to overcome the members in the Central Committee| danger of a split between the former for the Foster group was fixed at 18{ majority and minority. That does while 8 were assigned to the Ruthen-} not mean that the danger of a split berg group. Irrespective of this de-| {s completely eliminated or even con- cision there deyeloped-an actual split] siderably lessened. It only means that in three districts, ‘Phe Parity Com-| the crisis of the party has been moved mission succeeded fh.liguidating this} onto a new track; the former divi- split. sions in the party are giving way to HE decision of the Communist In-| new divisions. It is no secret in the ternational coincided in the most im-| party that there are seridus differ- portant practical proposals and deci-| ences between the Foster and Can- sions with those of the-Parity Com-| non groups. These differences are mission, not less thant 40% for the|not less serious than those that had epresentatives of the minority of the| existed between the former majority . and documents. ‘entral Committee (thé decision of|and minority. The formal division of Baldwin is now backing up the owners in their violation of thig Ae weRMing oF the: the Parity Commidsign” was 38%),|the former majority group into two ss specific agreement, with the lawyer’s argument that—in July 1925—| Parity Commission (beginning of| maximum of the parity means ~ ska ce one i a. of time. bak clearly bake shat ret of ion] haere ae oe Ghetings mente tae 2. ¢ i i i ~| all executive organs, (the decision o! at is the firs: q former majo. we begun to trave! . ca 8ggRe sa -tidh-dorig se aaa tmatboen! ex ned a fe ri of lah A er erin posiest the Parity Gonadal ras not less} Second: The differences between} a road that hose not lead toward the | P@Tty nor the Comintern could inter wage rates could be, under wore circumstances; “altered. The ganizations; similar situation exist-| than one-third for the minority), But] the new groups in the party follow a} Comintern, but in an entirely differ- pret such a further adherence in. any miners contend that the subsidy was granted definitely to provide] oq in: Philadelphia; in Chicago and| the political appraisaliof;both factions|new line, That does not mean that) ent direction. A number of facts trom other way than as a support to the that the rates prevailing in July 1925 would continue, without re-] New York the sitiation was extreme-| by the Comintern, contained in the the former differences are fully over-| party life after the party convention ace aby Rake group.. After: the gard to how these rates were derived. ly sharp. The party had two central| resolution of the B.-C, C. I, created|come. It merely means that new| prove that the contradictions within aa rerekoer tate sain which Clearly, the reactiohary tory government, with its spirit buoyed committees, two independent organ-|'a crisis within the thajority faction.| questions arise as the center of the| the former majority which has never provs 6 Fos: elman. up a bit by the new fascist army mobilizing for violence and ci Published by the DAILY WORKER PUBLISHING CO. 2118 W. Washington Blyd., Chicago, I. Phone Monroe 4712 | Cpa a eS SSS c SSE thd cs ER LN SUBSCRIPTION RATES By mail (in Chloage only): By matt (outside ef Chicago): $8.00 per year $4.50 six months | $6.00 per year $8.50 six months $2.50 three months $2.00 three months Here we find/a tremendous and ‘r-4 Objectively the situation in the econcilable contradiction between} P2"tY is as follows: Lore accepted I he words and the deeds.of the for- the resolution of the party congress er majority. It has long been es *vout his expulsion trom the party fabliohed that judgment of political | With a Ueht heart. He did not make parties and groups must be based| any attempt to protest against this not upon their words, their declara- decision to the C. L which only proves tions, their promises, their resolu- that the Comintern fs thoroly foreign tions and their ‘programs, but upon | ‘© Bim. Now he is openly working their deeds, upon their practical ac-| *B@ist it. Tho Lore alone is not a tivities. ‘The resolution of Cannon | D8 Dower, yet we must not forget was accepted (for the C. I.) but as eee ec are Gookeaeen ot Cee candidates for the politbureau there | S0cial democratic Loreist and halt- was selected Comrades Foster and earrory, Clnierere aries Oro Oey iH Bittelman who took a position against | ""™erous. in our party. the C. I, against the decision of the STER and Bittelmant are actnally Comintern. In words theréfore, they following @ line against the Comin- were for the C. I, in action against | tern altho they declare that they are it, in words for Cannon, in deeds for | for the Comintern. (Such declarations Foster and Bittelman. are very cheap.) They are gathering \ the right wing of the party around The last membership meeting of the New York party organization ee saceiyas g>: Gie: COnNED: where Comrades Zack, Krumbein and Aronberg made open declarations Hi: Meigs Tonger: in. the Foster: against the C. I. declaration, and de- y the Cannem group, which is clared ‘themselves ‘opehly against: co- supported by the healthier part of the operation with the Ruthenberg’ group, | ‘Tmex malerity, which actually 1s for By P. GREEN. SHORT report has been give! Address all mail and make out checks to : P : THE DAILY WORKER, 1118 W. Washington Bivd., Chicago, IIlinole Foster, in his HABA ae. me inl a athlon de tl le a Abs J. LOUIS BNGDAHL WMitors WILLIAM F, DUNND fm MORITZ J. LOEB......mesemserernene Business Manager IES aah a AES aR OAs A Sea A NOAA EST ERA OEY Bntered as second-class mail September 21, 1923, at the post-office at Chi- cago, lil, under the act of March 3, 1879, Parity Commission. I took occasion already during the party convention to emphasize that no stenographic minutes of the Parity Commission jexist and that therefore quotations from memory are not a good source Advertising rates on application ror tne information of the party, They aE are always more or less inexact and can always be questioned. It is there- Hfore preferable not to use such Who Gets the Subsidy? 1] sources, but instead use facts and The mine owners of Great Britain have been trying to reduc the base wage rates of the miners, in spite of the assurance made by, epitao eal a The report of the New York mem- them and Prime Minister Baldwin when the government granted ajj bership meeting makes it urgent for subsidy to “the industry,” that the base wage rates would remain—4jme to give the party a short report pending the report tof the new coal commission and a final agreef|°! the work of the Parity Commission ment—the same as they were in July 1925. Be 8 eae ae COS a ) : has made a further step a) izations with their own finances and! The faction split in-two parts; first|inmer party controversy. Now it is} been a homogeneous group are sharp- | SToup gainst connections and their own internal] the group of Comrade Foster which in {no longer the question of the labor| ening. From the one side the social/the Comintern, a firmer formal unity war against labor’s resistance to a decrease in its starvation living} discipline. the beginning declared itself for non-| party that is being discussed but senoess ‘a Aisivrg seer begin vel tea Catan bain Pi = Foster. i i i it-|the question of Bolshevization andj ‘to raise the: eads and openly op- group is a) ively @ sup standard, wants to renege on its July promise and contract with the ‘actual split was liquidated by |iparticipation in the Central Comm! te ea et the wort and frat| Dose reorganisation. On the other | port ot rik aoe : and later proposed not to take the Parity Commission. The Parity Commission did not de- tect any fundamental differences in political questions be miners, and is deliberately provoking a serious crisis. Without venturing into prophecy we may observe that British labor’s mood to take up the challenge for battle may result in a of all the question of the relation | hand, part of the former majority is} There is a lot of talk in the party of the party to the Communist In-| fully aware of the impossibility of fol-| at the present time that the last de ternational. (Both questions are very | !owing the road selected by Comrades | cision of the Comintern was the result closely connected. The group which | Foster and Bittelman, the road which | of incorrect information and. of. for- goes against the Comintern cannot] 10¢8 not-lead toward the Comingern. | eign influences. Tho talk:goes around at the same time be tor the Bol-| Tis part of the former majority is| that the Comintern will annul this shevization of the party.) beginning to desert its leaders and| decision, This is ridiculous humbug. EREFORE, if a split doés come,|*® 4PProach the Ruthenberg group. | But facts are stubborn things. No it will take place on a new line; (OMRADES FOSTER, Bittelman,|Tumor can eliminate or hide them.. only part of the former majority wil] / Krumbein, Aronberg and Zack de-| 18 it not a fact that Comrades Foster split off from the party. clared that they are for the Comin-| 4nd Bittelman are now taking 8 posi- ‘Third: What importance can be at-| tern, while in fact they are following | tion against the C. 1? Is it not a tached to the fact that the former|® Political policy against the Comin-| fact that they are supported in the majority faction accepted unanimous-| tern. Such a system of double ac-| Party by the right elements? These ly the resolution of Cannon but pro- counting, where one account belies | facts cannot be hidden by any reso- posed as members of the politbureau | ‘e other, cannot be continued tor | lution and even the C. L. does not and the secretariat Comrades Foster | #2¥ length of time. Already the una-| have the power to do that. =, | nimous acceptance of the political re- party has still many difficulties solutions in the Parity Commission sew ing that he did not see what caused it] was somewhat suspicious. This una- ahead of it until it stands on the to be made. He related tacts which | nimity smelled very much like double | **™ Stound of Bolshevism. But it led him to feel that the decision was] accounting. The deeds differing from will overcome these difficulties if it unexpected and unwarranted. He] words. The acceptance of the Cannon | /¢@rs to judge the groups and feo called upon all comrades to accept] resolution and the election of Foster | ons not by their words but by their the decision and carry it out. Com-fand Bittelman into the politbureau deeds. This is all rade Foster then spoke on Bolsheviza-| has clearly brot to life this double tion and reorganization. He showed} accounting. It became clear then that reorganization had been the prin-| that a parity policy in the C. EB. C. cipal item before the last enlarged|was impossible. One cannot give Executive Committee of the Commun-| equal rights to that group which is ist International meeting, and that ll by! Sreageece ge _ vans Lyre tive Committee was pledged to lend|now the task before us was—work to} which carries on a policy agi ist the all its energy and toe - to this|carry these decisions out. He also} Comintern, It is necessary to pre- period of its life and that the old work,-"Weeshoul@ hulp #0 develop .a| stressed, the federation as the breed-| Serve the leading role in “the party divisions are changing.. This is proot special organ for thé left aing move-| ing ground of factionalism and sectar-| for that groug’ which stands for the the empwth of the party end a / ment in the unions. ‘The Central|ianism, of isolation from the masses, Comintern not only in words, but also tee for its further develonment Executive Committee has organized a|of decentralization. A reorganized in deeds and which was characteris- the direction of Bolshevization, special trade unién department, would | party would not only be able to root ed by the Comintern as being “nearer!} Montreal, Sept. 30, 1925. capitalism is not going to allow such a thing unless forced after meeting with a speech on the im-|resume and intensity work among the| {ts influence in the masses but would open civil war with victory perched on the standards of the working] mediate problems confronting the| farming masses, and was working on | also feel the pulse of the masses at all class. This is why the question “Should the workers arm?” is the| party in the work of reorganization.|/a campaign against imperialism con-|moments. It would be a center for : debate before British labor. He reviewed the convention and Com-|certized on an active Organizational | organizing the unorganized, and would munist International decision, discuss- | basis. 4 . plant the party immediately in the ; i ’ Repair Men Caught as Collapse Occurs * Sr Se Pree eee ed the menace of Loreism and then very heart of the class struggle. If Liverpool and the Red F lag | went into‘ddetail on the meaning and| "eoreanization was-a. New York were reorganized now, the process of reorganization. Comrades | Political problem, not rierely an or- RICHMOND, Va. Oct. 2—More than one - hundred workers were 7a aS . 7, needle trades unions would be ours While the elated bourgeoisie is venting great shouts of joy at|asking questions from the floor and dis-|ganizational one. If the road to the| almost at once. the defeat of the Communists in the Liverpool labor party congress, | cussion followed, and. then the resolu- revolution was paved with picnic tick-| Lack of English, tho it was a bat the congress closes with three significant things. First, it opposes oe put, with the result given | ots we would have a walkover, consid- rier, Foster pointed ont, would “he the alleged “security pact”; second, it endorses the Dawes m % ering the present activity. of many : . third, it ends singing the “The Red Flag.” oar In his speech, Comrade Lovestone|party branches. Lovestone put the }OVercome by the language clubs beupid ging song, ie ag. declared that with the Communist blunt! thi ing: would supplant the federations. At Why this new mystification for our Main Streeters? Afte pedsonadipen gies. y-oeniiaagh “Aaa: ing a bd T | International decision and the conven: |we proud of the order. of business at | this time, with most of our members the Scarborough Trade Union Congress went to the left and the} tion, the party had really begun in|our meetings, were we,Satisfied to be|so long in the United States it wasa Liverpool labor party congress remained right, the British move-} earnest the work of Bolshevizing the | merely a “walking agency” collecting | disgrace for them not to understand trapped in the. collapse of a tunnel on the Chesapeake and Ohio railroad they: had been-sent in to repair, near Rickmond, Va. Most of the workers were foreign- born, The section that caved in took the roadway in the park above the ‘tunnel with it. Those who were first at the park could hear the stifled ment has no right to puzzle the brains of the American Babbits with|P@tty: Askeli’s removal and Lore’s money all the time and little else?) Mnglish. They had better hurry up added conundrums. expulsion, both of which were politi-! The fault was to a great extent in the ]and learn it if they wish to become a groans of the workers that were caught in the tunnel. majority in that committee, and cond, the group of Comrade Can- on which made the. proposal to or- adopted unanimously. (I em-} basis of the parity principle. The phasize this fact later when I analyze | view of Comrade Cannon was vic- the party life during the last months.|torious and his proposal was ac- I will therefore come back to this.) |cepted unagimously by the faction The election campaign before the|after a long discussion. party convention was the basis for} A new session of the majority fac- an extreme sharpening of the factional | tion designated as candidates for the ‘struggle. The dangers of a split grew | politbureau Comrades Foster and Bit- to a high pitch. Especially so because |telman. (During all this time Com- apparently the struggle was not about|rade Bittelman supported Comrade principles but about the majority in | Foster, aap ta the party. in the meeting of the new Central out is the truth of the debate going on over the subsidy. The owners got all huffy the other day when A. J. Cook mentioned that the owners had little cause to cut wage rates when the subsidy guar- aw dantees their profits. This was a lie, the owners vociferously protest. Let's see. The owners were making profit on the coal mined and marketed. If they do not make profit the coal isn’t mined, with the miners un- employed and profits stopped. This, of course, has been a result in some degree of competing with reparations “Dawes plan coal”—but no one will deny that the unemployed miners bear the heayiest bur- den of suffering and want. There have been no mine owners reduced | The representatives of the minority, | Committee—thanks_to my vote—the) to Hving in shanties and begging for crusts. Under capitalism the first charge upon industry is profit. Unless NEW YORK MEMBERSHIP MEETING the miners accepted the wage cut, the owners said they could make no profit and would shut down. The miners refused to accept a INDORSES CEN TRAL EXECUTIVE ent, and the government, to prevent disastrous dislocation to all in = EC dustry, agreed to pay a subsidy to the mine owners to allow the COMMITTEE AND C. I. D ISIONS continuance of wages without taking the owners’ profits. The claim ‘s The Daily Worker! of the miners that the subsidy guaranteed profits is correct, and the ae vee quslbeag aa pied the attempt to cut wages is a deliberate effort to provoke a new battte| New York City membership meeting with labor in the hopes, as our Chicago Tribune says, that the British| held at Manhattan Lyceum on Sept. bourgeoisie has a better chance “for a clear showdown now,” with|25, the Central Executive Committee the aid of the counter-revolution organizing its fascist army for a reign Prades ape Ba ER pith Pees Sco vv the Tribune wishes us to believe would be but trom voting: 7 er nine ‘mon ated . as ie rst ste) ie si The settlement which answers the need of society is, of course,|Paign to Bolshevize and reorganize the nationalization of the mines, but it is appare! itish | the Party on the shop nucleus basis. 5 s apparent that British Comtfade” Lavedionp’ obanet She € on the other. It will mean intensi- fying our work, bringing into unions the membership and then fighting to win the majority of the working class for Communism, The Central Execu- take further part in the work of the Workers Party in this extremely im- portant period of Bolshevization and reorganization. But it is clear to me that the party has entered a new BECOME PART OF GIGANTIC TRUST To Control the Large Granaries Since the Ward Baking company has hed its prices on‘bread 20%, the r companies have held a con- ference and a ‘ying to find ways of meeting the slash. * The Ward company has been a non- union concern for a number of years and this attempt on its part to slash prices is interpreted by the union officials of the Bakers’ Union as noth- ing but an attempt to force the small union shops into the bankruptcy and the larger union shops into the non- union column. By yp The slash of 20% in bread prices by the Ward: Bakery company, comes a Anthracite Death List for August By EARL R. BROWDER. URING the month of August, 46 miners of anthracite coal were killed In the bituminous mines. This is the latest casualty list issued by the bureau of mines, department of commerce, at Washing- ton, Ten miners were killed in an explosion at Wilkes-Barre on Aug, 3. HE total number of miners killed during 1925 now stands at 1,461. The death rate in anthracite for the eight months shows an in- crease over last year of eight per cent. The month of September will show a sudden o wholesale killing of anthracite miners. This is beca they have left the mines, on strike for an Increase of 10 per cent in the price of miners’ lives. F the Mich anthracite profiteers will just pay a little more money out of their bursting treasuries they can buy all the miners’ lives which they need to destroy in order to continue their flow of profits. Such is anthracite mining and Industry generally under capital- ism. It would cost the workers less in life and limb to take the indus- tries away from| the capitalists entirely, and operate them for the benefit of the entire working class. . cal, not personal acts, were the signal} basically wrong form of organization | factor in the American class struggle, j But the fact is that the fraternity that has grown up between} of the newt tendency, Lore had been |of our party, rh social-democratic leg-| and the pce place to learn Laan ge British and Russian labor is so overwhelming that even James] given the chance to appear in Moscow | acy, which specialized in parliament-|in the shop nucleus. The clubs would Ramsay MacDonald has to bend an ear to the argument that the| before th: Executive Committe? of)ary campaigns and was organized to|have fractions in them, fractions “security pact” is a war alliance against the Soviet Union, Com- eee ait har aa eet pobireatns ger bastt 1 saad gipipe Which: would pe: contected up tn. iy . ‘ x ts % edes™: himself, hut had refu capitalism. Our party must be based |tional organizations that would sup- ingen a a, forced kc agee edie Pjatonic gesture at end upon his expu!s'on showed how jon the working clags, organized where | port the language press. Inertia was pposition to a new war agains the workers’ republics.| much.of a Communist he was by tm-|they are found, in the mines, mills,|a big difficulty in the way of reorgan- He cannot betray the Russian workers, so he makes a virtue of| mediately attacking the Communist | factories and shops. The plans issued |ization, and an ideological campaign protecting them and has the added advantage of being in opposition International, attempting to discredit|by the Central Executive Committee | must be waged that would destroy it. to the Baldwin government which made the “security pact” and can] *"4 nlermine it. ‘The party had now | would soon turn | the pious wish| A great many questions were then gain political capital by opposing its handiwork. cutgcom™n.the time wasn ‘such oppor- | which reorganizatign had been for 60 }asked' about reorganfsation of the : ak Tie 4 ‘f PP ki ¢ Mac ‘ tunism was permissible. The theory |long into an actuality. The branch, | party and discussion followed. Com-| A’ rescue crew has begun the work ie ae Poet ae > se ane acDonald’s own babies.|of mass spontaneity, a “senile dis-|section and city membership meet- | rades k, Aronberg and Krumbein | of rescuing the covered workers. It It may be a sickly infant with a questionable parent on the other] ease” a Stalin had called it, had also |ings, the mobilization of the press, | discussed the Communist International }is not known. as- yet_how many are side from MacDonald, but it is his. And then this Dawes plan only| ee? struck a severe blow. the assembling of all our resources to |decision and the resolution introdue-|in the tunnel. The railroad head in prtae! ge a nirder etwven tiaeae betrays the British workers, who are in his power in some measure.| Lore’s argument that the Commun. {educate the party ‘to, the immediate|ed by the Central Executive Commit- charge of the job estimates there tinental ain Oi ans the Wied ite wan 'dp iti ab the dose it : ist International was basing its decis-; necessity of reorganization — this|tee representative. Zack and Aron-| were several hundred in the tunwel| paying ‘thas ‘toumation. of r ait athe ions on wrong information, a typical | Would soon uproot the territorial and | berg declared their opposition to the| and that many have been able to es- bread Pere sep san pegrer megs As to the “Red Flag,” that is a traditional song in the ranks opportunist claim, which was-used as | federation basis of the party, a basis|Communist International decision| cape. The estimated number within id ad fit ns io welt bps | of British labor, and just.as only a “political idiot,” as Lenin once|an excuse for evasion, defeatism and ) Which Piatniteky called “federat-|and attacked the resolution of the}the tunnel at present is placed above will ponte jmeteapean ene elevators said, pays attention to words, so it may be said that while the labor] s@botage of Communist International 9 chaos” bya Ni 4 = ind 2 Central Executive Committee, Com-|100.- ; flour mills and baking establishments piles ‘6 Aes? ¢ A ee decisions, had also been smashed. is respect one o' most backward jrade Krumbein alleged that the de- ‘ - party congress closed singing the “Red Flag” it raised a white one. His attempt in the Volkszeitung to ene 4 Ne he ned a cision of the Central Executive Com- Kino anatt ee in all the principal cities of America. use the removal from power in the |tional. Our 8 4 ies” with | mittee in the selection of the person- a eS German Communist Party of Fischer |their inevitable factionalism and pin-|nel of the sub-committees in New Pi a a pede Bho ae Italian Mission to and Maslov as capital for his case |Prick politics would give place to a|York district was factional and de-| comes the apple evon in Wathinaton| Come to America for was also typical of an opportunist. | party 80 organized that of it “every |clared that he would abstain from and Orégon and thet potato pes a That removal was along the same line factory would be a Communist fort- | voting. Idaho; as {8 pointed out by ie, in! Debt Conference Now F as the decision on the American ques: Tse" (Henin). Members must take} Comrades Gitlow, Wolfe, Stachel| dustrial Workers of the World trom} jo tion—a blow at right deviations n organizing nucle!, @8/ ana Weinstone spoke in favor of the| thelr headquarters in.Chicago. They |, POM™ Oct. 2-— The Italtan deb cloaked in ultra-left phrases. The |00n as three of work in on€ | Oontral Executive Committee resolu-| urge their organizers and active Bilston (Wil wail-OD, CSIONS. 70) 97. pessimism of the comrades led by Loe tt firagg then notity the|+ion and the Communist International | members to utilize the hatvest.condi.| Coun’, Vl! Snance miniater at these two was the result of an un-| {istrict office and i would see that decigion. They pointed out that the| tions for organizing the transient Sees toe eee awareness of new developments in the | the nucleus lives Grows. remarks of Zack, Krumpein and| migratory workers. that flood those| tre’ iatar teen, eovernment working .class ranks, as well as of 2| Our slogans for guecess, Lovestone|Aronberg were” violations of » the| districts. Wenatchee and Yakima will| (cc ,,/auan fascist, dictatorship. lack of confidence in the party, an ac-|/emphasized, are (1) “Stand by the) spirit of the Communist International | be the organizing centers. - bec, ceptance of the decisions of the Inter-| Communist International” as an ans-|decision and were raising factional- 4 Value of Muscle Shoal, national Communist Party in words, |wer to Loreties and other opportun-|ism at a time when the party should ._. War Dogs Hold Mitchell NEW YORK, Oct. The arm: while“sabotaging them in practice. | ists: (2) “Back to work” a full Mqvi-| get down to work on reorganization] WASHINGTON, Oct. 2.— Colonel district engineer at Muscle Shoal bat Bolshevization, Lovestone defined as | dation of the recent factional strug-| and bolshevization. They particular-| “Billy” Mitchell, who kicked up the| gxed the cost of Wilson tan preys the application of the lessons and ex- | gle, which we are leaving for the next | ly scored the remarks of those com-| Present air row, has been ordered by | 000,000. The productive value was set periences of the Russian Communist | stage of building a mass party; (3)|rades as they were members of the| the War department to remain fn] at 361 000, 000. Party and the Russian revolution on|“Unity in our ranks” (4) the spirit|Central Executive Committee and| Washington to appear next week be- eripgenicat a con¢rete basis to the objective con-|of the “subotnzik” (Saturdaying) of| District Executive Committee, fore the inspector general of the ditions in the United States. It will /sacrifice for the party, more hard} Comrade Lovestone then summed | “MY to answer charges: agi mean lessening the gap between the| work, more loyalty to the party and|up for the Central Executive Commit.| fF ¢riticising the war and navy de- rank -and file of thee party and | Communist International, tee, replying to the arguments, and rtments, it was learned here today; the*centér, on the one hand, and less-; Comrade Foster. juced his re-|the resolution was put to-a vote and ni ening p between the party and/ marks with a reférence to the Com-|carried by an overwhelming mor the » daieee of the proletariat, | munist Internatioual decision declar- | tty, oy ee No Hope for 8-51 Crew. _ WASHINGTON, Oct, 2.—The navy department this afternoon abandon- ed all hopé of rescuing alive any . members of the crew of the subma- If you want to thoroughly \n-| rine 8-51, which sank last week off Jevstand Communism—study it.| Block Island.