The Daily Worker Newspaper, April 25, 1924, Page 4

"1; Norman Tallentire, 3; Alfred Back- Page Four Campaign ‘Almost Half Over ‘As Leaders Near Quota. With one-half the period for the 10,000 new subscription drive almost over, leaders in the campaign are rapidly approaching the quota set for them. After a bitter struggle for first place Warren, Ohio, suffered from a week of inactivity and surrendered its position to Superior, Wis., which now has undisputed hold on the top with 86 per cent of its quota reached. Miles City, Mont., is making another bid for fame and after a quiet week last week has again come to life bringing its rating up to 80 per cent, For the leaders it is no longer a struggle to see whether the quota can be reached but to see how far it can be surpassed. Kansas City, Mo., which made the suggestion that prize banners be given to the winning city, now seems to think that having made the proposal it is only proper that it should win the prize in its division. The net results of the week’s activity in the “show me” city is a boost in percentage from 44 to 54. * * Toledo Shows Its Class Again. In the cities with quotas of more than 100, the week shows extra- ordinary activity. Toledo, Ohio, has slipped into the lead with a smashing total of 36 new subs for the period and an increase in percentage over last week of from 37.5 to 58. Brooklyn, N. Y., which has held the lead for big cities almost from the beginning slipped a cog and now must show its stuff if it hopes to catch the live bunch from Toledo. The latter has as fine an aggregation of DAILY WORKER sub getters as can be found in the couuntry. Comrade Earl Merritt is proving a worthy team-mate of Comrade Harvitt while Comrades Beck, Davy, Stephenson, Beuhler, Wilinecker and a dozen others make up an organization which can well challenge any set of DAILY WORKER boosters in the country. Detroit has raised itself in the world again with a total of 39 new subs for the week which brings it up to an almost respectable percent- age of 24.5. the week. * Philadelphia and Pittsburgh are keeping up the good work and give evidence of reaching their quota at the very least. slow in getting started, is working up speed. Minneapolis, Chicago was asleep for * The Stickers Will Win! Records made by dozens of cities thus far and the rate at which the subscriptions continue to come. prove conclusively that THE DAILY WORKER has taken a firm hold in the minds and in the activities of the real militants. Those who will win in this campaign are the ones who continue to work for THE DAILY WORKER day in and day out. In such ways are all struggles won and as the strength and prestige of THE DAILY WORKER is gaining thru the loyal and steady support of the active comrades, so the strength and power of the labor movement is on the gain. The stickers will win! The victory in the campaign for THE DAILY WORKER and the victory of the workers will be theirs. * * * ‘ Here’s The Record For The Week. City Superior, Wis. .... Miles City, Mont. Warren, O. Newark, N. J. So. Bend, Ind. Monessen, Pa. . Revere, Mass. .. Ambridge, Pa. . Duluth, Minn. .. Portland, Ore. . Kansas City, Mo. .. Denver, Colo. Toledo, O. .. Brooklyn, N. Y. Reading, Pa. Philadelphia, Pa. .. Galloway, W. V. Springfield, Il. W. Concord, N. H. Rochester, N. Y. Canonsburg, Pa. Oakland, Calif. Erie, Pa. Pittsburgh, Neffs, Ohio .... Worcester, Mass. Milwaukee, Wis. Providence, R. I. Johnson City, Il. New York City Menanga, .... Detroit, Mich. .. Ely, Minn. Christopher, Cleveland, ‘Ohio Paterson, N. J. Grand Rapids, Mich. Bessemer, Pa. .. Hammond, Ind. Elizabeth, N. J. Chicago, Ill. .. Marshfield, Ore. Canton, Ohio Youngstown, Ohio McKeesport, Pa. St. Louis, Mo. . Seattle, Washington Rockford, Ill. ... W. Frankfort, Ill. San Bernardine, Calif. Daisytown, Pa. Minneapolis, Min Los Angeles, Calif. .. Waukegan, IIL McKees Rocks, Pa. New Haven, Conn. .. Buffalo, N. Y. Zeigier, Ml. .... Int'l Falls, Minn. Waterbury, Conn. Cincinnati, O. 25 St. Paul, Minn. San Francisco, Moline, Ill. .... se Quota Subs turned Subs Pet of in up to turned Quota last week in to date reached 33 43 86 17 0 80 68 1q 68 16 64 i 60 = 60 60 58 56 54 58 58 47 46 41 40 40 = 40 20 40 oo co 2 he ty o Nose RIS Oe te oo $ 2 & co ererts Soreses ne rr a tocsen Sate te S fh 08 oe eb me tt ot * HERE’S THIS WEEK’S HONOR cae Is your name there? Has it been there? Will it there again? NEW YORK CITY: Frank Chalaup- ka, 2; Sylvan A. Pollack, 3; G. E. Kel- ly, 2; J. Weinstein, 1. NEW YORK DAILY WORKER, Office, 12; V. Fo- dor, 1. CLEVELAND, OHIO: G. Noreika, 2; 8. Bergman, 4; J. R. Jackson, 1; F, Rupnik, 3; Jos. Julian, 1; EB. A. Duchan, 1. TOLEDO, OHIO: F. Davey, 1; A. W. Harvitt, 2; Chas. Stephenson, 1; Shreiner, 1; H. C. Peterson, 1; N. Beck, 7; Harl Merrit, 2. PITTSBURGH, PA.: Bill Scarville, 14; H. A. Evans, 1; G. H. Bolling, SUPERIOR, WIS.: Central Commit- tee, 10. DETROIT, MICH.: W. Reynolds, 4; EB. Owens, 2; A. Gerlach, 1; P. Boneff, 1. MINNEAPOLIS, ik, 1; O. Coover, 2; Chas. Dirba, 3. 1 man, 1. PHILADELPHIA, PA: Frank Winkler, 1; W. Popov, 1; J. Sternpley- ich, 1; F. Winkler, 1; Abe Shapin, 2. CHICAGO, ILL.: Erick Wickstrom, 1; Hans Johnson, 1; 8. Zolpe, 1; J. Heinrickson, 1; Bessie Spiegel, 14 Clara Saffern, 1. KANSAS CITY, MO.: N. Sorenson, 6. ANGORA, MINN.: Andrew Roine, 1 1 1 HIGHLAND PARK, MICH: Hanesin, 1. BARBERTON, O.: I. M. Thomas, 1. NEW CASTLE, PA.: A. N. Belden; MILES CITY, MONT.: J. H. Wilson, HAVERHILL, MASS.: A. Davis, 3. “BERKELBY, CALIF.: V. V. Dart, 3. DAISYTOWN, PENNA.: Vincent Kemenovich, 2; Mike Maruschak, 1. ASTORIA, ORE.: Anna Jarvi, 3 ROCHESTER, MINN.: A. Militant, BROOKLYN, N. Y.: D. Laine, 1; A. Rasp, 2. DULUTH, MINN.: Elmer Haglund, MARENGO, WIS.: Chas. Johnson, DE FER, WIS.: A. Iiminen, 1. DRUMHEL/J.ER, ALTA., CAN.: Pat- rick Conroy, t MINN.: Walter} RENTON WASH: B. Ofner, 1. WHEATLAND PENNA.: N. P, Shaffer, 1. RICHMOND, VA.: M. G. Zaharin, AMBRIDGP, PA.: Geo. Maich, 1. ROCHESTER, N. Y.: H. Davis, X BUFFALO, N. Y.: Jacob Hohl, 1, ISHPBMING, MICH: Chas, Koivu, DORCHESTER, ARE ts ees 0. HE DAILY WORKER Friday, April 25, 1924 Marx and Proletarian Dictatorship - ‘HERE is a “Unitea Front of the “yellow Socialists’—the American Socialist Labor Party, the Socialist Party, and the German Social Demo- crats—to prove that the Communists of Russia and of the world are wickedly non-Marxian in their advo- cacy of the Dictatorship of the Pro- letariat. The Socialist Labor Party in their edition of Marx’s Gotha Pro- gramme attempt to prove that Marx didn’t mean what he said when he ship of the proletariat” as the only possible transition between capital- ism and Communism. Grandmother Kautsky has for some years now been proving the dictatorship to be unhis- torical, from the point of view of Marxism. Our Socialist Party pub- lishes in their new weekly, the “New Leader,” February 16, 1924, another diatribe against Lenin for being so violent and Tataric and militaristic as to preach dictatorship—and Kautsky in his anility says it for them. In the “New Leader” of January 19, 1924, Hillquit undertakes to demon- strate the incorrectness of the dic- tatorship—altho unwillingly admit- ting that to destroy a capitalist dic- tatorship such as Italy’s or Hungary’s revolution and dictatorship may be necessary. A Lie Scotched. It is about time that we once for all: scotched this snake, or rather, killed it. Marx and Engels did be- lieve in and preach the dictatorship of the proletariat, consistently and actively for forty years. Hillquit says that Marx merely “coined the phrase”; Kautsky calls it a “single word” - a shibboleth (wortchen) in his “Dict. of the Prolet.” (Germ. ed., page 20); the Socialist Labor Party tells us that Marx’s reference in the Gotha Programme is “his only direct reference to and authority for the phrase ... pulled in to illumine @ point . .. offhand and incidental.” I will not believe that this is igno- rance; it is deliberate misinformation and falsification. I shall prove this broad charge by direct quotations from Marx and Engels, indicating the sources. Even Kautsky himself shall testify to his lies. In the “Class Struggles in France, 1848 to 1850,” Marx says of the Paris proletariat, “—only the defeat first convinced it of the truth that the slightest improvement in its condition within the bourgeois republic re- mains a utopia... . In place of its demands .. . arose the keen revolu- tionary battle-cry: Overthrow of the bourgeoisie! Dictatorship of the work- ing. class!” (Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Jan., 1850.) Again in 1852 in a letter to Weyde- mayer (published in Neue Zeit, Vol. 25, part 2, p. 164) Marx considers him- self the real author of the theory of the dictatorship, and shows it to be one of his chief contributions to his- torical thinking. “As far as I am con- cerned, I can’t claim to have discoy- ered the existence of classes in modern society or their strife against one another. ... I have added as a new contribution the following propo- sitions: (1) that the existence of classes is bound up with certain phases of material production; (2) that the class struggle leads neces- sarily to the Dictatorship of the Pro- letariat; (3) that this dictatorship is but the transition to the abolition of |* all classes and to the creation of a society of free and equal.” Does this sound like the Socialist Labor Party charge that “the uninitiated might easily conceive the notion that his (Marx’s) criticism constitutes a de- CLARIDGE, PA.: Sturn Lawrence, 1, FITCHBURG, MASS.: Wilho Bow- man, 1. GARDNER, MASS: Tolvo Montyla, 1. PERTH AMBOY, N. J.: B. Skapen- etz, 1. 91819 CHRISTOPHER, ILL.: Victor Cer- nich, 1. RANKIN, PENNA.: John Bodog, CANTON, OHIO: A. B, Hoffman, CLOQUET, MINN.: Tyyne Kiutti, SPARROWS, MD.: H. Sutinen, 1. STONINGTON, ILL.: Julia Friga- let, 1. RUDYARD, MICH.: Henry Dalbeck, 1. . EBEN JUNCTION, MINN.: Wm. I. Niemi, 1 ATLANTA, GA.: S. V. Anagnosti, 1. ‘FREEDOM, PA.: D. W. Myers, 1. CANONSBURG, PA.; John Lutvala, 1 NEWBERRY, MICH.: E. Maki, 2. FARIBAULT, MINN.: Ferd. Frech- ette, 1. ST. LOUIS, MO.: T. R. Sullivan, 1; H. L. Goldberg, 1. READING, PENNA.: Harold R. John, 2. DENVER, COLO.: SANTA ROSA, Heaney, 2. RANKIN, PENNA.: Paul Cinat, 2, SO. BEND, IND.: John Tezla, 1; Geo. Meyer, 1. ERIE, PENNA.: Ed. Laurila, 1; H. Perkon, 1, JOHNSTON CITY, ILL: Mark Rad- alovich, 1; John R. Wood, 1; Joe Blazena, 1. MAYNARD,. MASS.: Matti Kujala, 1; J. H. Saisa, 1. NEWARK, N. J.: Waino Nummi, 2. OAKLAND, CALIF.: A. M. Rainti, Wm. Dietrich, 2. CALIF.: M. F, predicted the “revolutionary dictator- | | Commune! fense of the dictatorship as against its opponents?” Engels-Kautsky Correspondence. Kautsky says of the Communists, “Its adherents insist, to be sure that their cult of violence is ancient wis- dom, and the outcome of the re- searches of the most profound of our thinkers, Karl Marx, they say, preached force.” This dotard himself said at a more honest moment, in 1910 or so, “Marx and Engels ham- mered out the idea of the dictatorship of the proletariat, which Engels stubbornly defended in 1891, shortly before his death—the idea that the political autocracy of the proletariat is the sole form ‘in which it can real- ize its control of the state.” (Trotzky, “Defense of Terrorism,” London, 1921, p. 21). Kautsky had to admit this because Engels wrote him a let- ter on June 29, 1891, urging this tac- tic upon him in place of the “dan- gerous opportunism” of the Erfurt Programme. How pleased Kautsky was with this advice can be seen from his characterization of it as political autocracy. Thé rule of the working class as autocracy, foresooth! Marx further ‘shows how seriously he meant this theory in an article sent to an Italian socialist review in 1873. Let our Galahads of democracy take what comfort they can from his firm belief in the armed overthrow of the bourgeois state, in the revolu- tionary proletarian dictatorship, and in the transitional proletarian state (instead of the syndicalist idea of im- mediately abolishing the state and substituting for it that patented in- dustrial unionism of the Socialist Labor Party) Marx writes, “If the political struggle of the working class assumes a revolutionary form; if the workers, in place of the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, set up their own revolutionary dictatorship, then they commit a terrible crime and offer an insult to principle; because, fore- sooth, the workers, in order to meet the miserable, gross requirements of the moment, in order to crush the re- sistance of the capitalist class, cause the State to assume a revolutionary and transitional form, instead of lay- ing down their arms and abolishing the State.” (Neue Zeit, 1913-14, Year Dictatorship of Proletariat. Now let us take up Marx’s famous “only” reference to the dictatorship in the Gotha Programme letter to Bracke, in 1875.. He says in the pre- vious paragraph that he will speak of the changes the State will undergo in the future, that he will -proceed “sci- entifically,” and he then tells us that “can be nothing else but the revolu- tionary dictatorship of the prole- tariat” (bold-face Marx's). Altho Marx and Engels repeatedly propa- gated the theory of proletarian dicta torship from 1847 to 1891, our friends of the Socialist Party, the Socialist Labor Party, and the Social Demo- crats insist that there exists only a single, incidental mention of it. To give a brief historical survey of the theory, which runs like a red thread thru the writings of both, I shall quote from their works written with- in this period, 1847—“the struggle of class against class ... means a com- plete revolution”; “the Communists «+. openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow ... of the ruling classes. . + The proletariat established its rule by means of the violent over- throw of the capitalist class;” “The first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the prole- tariat to the position of ruling class.” 1848—“there is only one means of shortening, simplifying and concen- trating the torturing death agonies of society—only one means—revolution- ary terrorism.” 1850—see quotations from “Class Struggles in France.” 1852—see quotation from letter to Weydemayer. In 1871, in 1873, in 1875 Marx reaffirmed his belief in the dictatorship. Paul Lafargue in 1888, Kautsky himself in 1899, the Russian Social Democrats, Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, in 1903 all have stated 1,| their adherence to the theory of pro- 1, | letarian dictatorship. And then our Kautskys come along and tell us that Marx once accidentally mentioned a phrase, which the Russian Commun- ists seized upon to justify their un- democratic rule. Paris Commune. I shall end my quotations with one cloak their treason. In 1891 he wrote that the “German philistine has lately been thrown again into whole- sale paroxysms by the expression “dictatorship of the proletariat.” How prophetic a statement would this be were Engels living today to see the convulsions of our philistines of the Yellow International. He went on, “Gentlemen, do you want to know what the dictatorship of the prole- tariat is like? Then look at the Paris That was the dictator- ship of the proletariat.” (Radek, “Prolet. Dict. and Terrorism,” p. 23). Both Marx and Engels criticized the Commune for not having made great- er use of the armed authority they held in their hands. To them the Commune was a very mild example of proletarian dictatorship. How they would have been overjoyed at the Soviets! The Paris Commune was not based on the teachings of Marx- ism, while the Russian Revolution was, and the results are before us, to the confusion of the Kautskys, Hillquits, MacDonalds thruout the world, In a work on during the transition period the State|Tose, where Hillquit’s “political de- goieff. Roumania, Jugo-Slavia, Es- Finland, Latvia, Lithuania are or two by Engels, who is now being/@md work for the installation of de- used by the reactionary socialists to} mocracy in Russia. The Proletarian again speaks of the dictatorship as the transitional stage to the abolition of classes and of the state. When Kautsky condemns the bloody terrorism of the Communist dictatorship in Russia, calling it a tyrannous rule of a minority, we can see how Marxian he becomes. When he speaks of the glorious trinity of Mussolini, Horthy and Lenin this Judas links himself with such pure democrats as Noske, Kerensky and MacDonald (this latter now become a militarist, butcher of Hindoos, and a strikebreaker). In answer to Len- in’s charge of sophist and traitor, he calls Lenin a brute and says that such strong terms should not be used in intercourse between educated men, between gentlemen! Democracy?—Dictatorship! But both Kautsky and his satellite, Hillquit, are beginning to make some damaging admissions. They go so far as to say that when a brutal open dictatorship of the Fascisti confronts us, we may not always be able to avoid violence in retaliation and de- fense. They would permit a prole- tarian dictatorship in Hungary, Spain and Italy, and Kautsky will obligingly allow the Soviets to be overthrown by force and violence. But where democracy rules, in every other coun- try in the world, the parliamentary fiction which cloaks the dictatorship of capitalism must not be disturbed. Mussolini proclaims a return to de- mocracy (which should bring him back into the fold), plans to gerry- mander the proletarian election dis- tricts, and to demand one thousand names for each nominee, with Fascist supervision of elections. Of course, Communist signers will not be perse- cuted—none of them will be butch- ered when the Fascisti fear their victory. Stinnes, against the great electoral power of the Social Demo- crats, puts his puppet into the chan- eellorship. The Greek strong man, Plastiras, confiscates all union bank d¢posits, declares trade unions ille- gal, and seizes their property, build- ings. and press. Daugherty here is- sues injunctions and outlaws strikes; the foremost “democracy” in the world uses agents provocateurs, raids political meetings of Communists and I. W. W., sends troops. to break strikes, attempts to fingerprint, pass- port and inclose within a pale of set- tlement all foreign-born, and even naturalized radical workingmen. 32, Vol. 1, p. 40.) Socialists Support Fascism. To consider for a moment some of the other advanced countries of Eu mocracy. seems firmly established.” Germany is now under Seeckt’s mili- tary dictatorship of capitalism, the Communists are persecuted and hunt- ed. The Social Democrats vote for dictatorship—but for whose? Hill- quit, writing in January, chose not to know what had happened in Germany months before. The Social Demo crats’ “Vorwarts” publishes false documents on Communists’ stores of arms, and further incites eapitalist militarism against the proletariat. Poland is a democracy in which strikes are savagely repressed and the Socialist Daszynsky sells out to a military dictatorship; where thou- sands are jailed for being Comm” ists or military whionists. ~ -.aria is another Kautskian paradise where democracy ravages the land. Social- ist Minister Kasakoff, aided by Wran- gel’s remnants is in a government that has executed 15,000 workers and peasants, murdered treacherously the imprisoned Communist leader, Bla- other countries where the Commun- ists are outlawed, jailed, murdered, by the thousands. And whatever hap- pens to the Communists, the militant unionists share. Democratic Belgium has four to five hundred prisoners. In the face of this panorama of virgin democracy, our Hillquit prophesies and hopes for electoral victories rather than revolution, and Kautsky tells us that democracy. is making great progress on the main- land of Europe. When MacDonald sells out to a capitalist dictatorship, as his threats to India, his naval pro- gram, and his strikebreaking indi- cate, then will go the last pretense at democracy. What will Kautsky, Hill- quit and Company say then? They have given us a hint. They will pray Dictatorship of Russia “may and probably will fight its way to an or- der of social democracy.” Let Marx reduce to absurdity the treasonable pacifism, alternating with vicious militarism, which these pro- fessional students of Marxism exhibit in counselling their ever-diminishing following of honest workers be- lieve in democracy. “While awaiting the glorious social revolution, the workers are to be on their good be- havior, to conduct themselves like the sheep of a well-fed stock, to let the government alone, to fear the police, honor the laws, and uncom- plainingly permit themselves to be used as cannon-fodder.” (1873). “Nation's” Forced Admission. Just as the writer. was finishing this article, the “Nation” in its issue of March 19, 1924, published an edi- torial entitled “The New Masters of Europe.” It at last recognizes capi- talist dictatorships—as yet, in Europe only—and goes far beyond our “yel- low Socialist” theoreticians in see- ing in them not tyrannous Napo- housing | leonic despotiams of an individual, but question written: in sau tm Bagels class rule by capitalists. Tes tolle us TTT TTT TS By A. G. BOSSE that the “decay of parliamentarism is ‘an often-observed phenomenon”; it admits the truth of the statement that government is primarily charged with maintaining order, protecting indus- try and private business. When par- liamentarism goes and’ business rules absolutely (our pacifistic _intellectu- als still refuse to see the former as the everyday guise of business rule), then the result is—Germany today: hours increased, wages lowered, starvation, and terrible misery, with proletarian revolution and proletarian dictatorship as the only escape. The editors of the “Nation” go so far as to see in France a dictatorship of bankers and large. corporations; in Austria, Hungary and Germany, the absolute rule of intérnational bankers, at present, are impending. Our oil mess reveals even to the unwilling the American dictatorship. And yet Kautsky, Hillquit, et. al., talk of de- mocracy? As Lecky with his twisted bourgeois ideology calls prostitution the protection of the family, so these “socialists” prostitute the working class to parliamentary democracy, and then call this method of capi- talist dictatorship a protection. Our liberals at least will admit a fact which stares them in the face, even tho they don’t understand its impli- cations, even tho they look to Mac- Donald’s imperialistic “pacifism” as a salvation. When the tribe of Kautsky admits, if they ever will, the futility of democracy, then will Marxism and Leninism be completely triumphant in words as they are in fact. NEW YORK, April 24.—While show- ing off their new duds by walking up and down Fifth avenue, New York, Easter Sunday, the upper class had to witness a peace parade. “We have outlawed war between indviduals— why not between nations?” was the most frequent banner in the automo- bile parade of foreign delegates to the coming Washington conference, Wom- en’s International League for Peace and Freedom. PY . & To Be City Time PEORIA, ILL.. ROCHESTER, N. Y. PEKIN, ILL. JAMESTOWN, N. NIAGARA FALLS, N. NEW YORK CITY.. BLOOMINGTON, ILL. DEKALB, ILL. DéXON, ILL. DAVENPORT, je ROCK ISLAND, ILL. MOLINE, ILL... ROCKFORD, ILL.. AURORA, IL! KENOSHA, WIS. WAUKEGAN, IL RACINE, WIS. % 19 So. Lincoln St. Wallace Organizes Research Council For Pulp Bosses (Special to The Daily Worker) WASHINGTON, D. C., April 22.— A Northeastern Forest Research Council has been announced by Se- eretary of Agriculture Wallace to ad- vise the forest experiment stations of New York and New England so that the newspaper bosses of the large eastern cities will not have to worry about tneir paper pulp supply. uy The council is largely made up of timber-owning industries. It in- cludes also spokesmen of wood-using industries and representatives of for- estry schools, agricultural colleges and the state forest services of the region. The council is not for research, but merely to consider the best means of stripping the forests so that the flood of- advertising may not cease. The house building industry will receive some attention alse; as a lumber shortage threatens it. Lumber work- ers are not part of the program of the council. They can look out for themselves. In fact, the pulp wood interests Wallace is working with re- cently assisted in railroading three representatives of the Lumber Work- EIGHT REELS OF ~* All Proceeds Go Toward the Relief of the Workers of Germany Thru the COMMITTEE FOR INTERNATIONAL WORKERS’ AID Friends of Soviet Russia and Workers’ Germany AMERICAN SECTION ar ers’ section of the Industrial Workers of the World in Maine, to prison for one to two- year terms, False Americanism And Bigotry In U.S., Says Cal. Schoolman (By The Federated Press) SANTA. CRUZ, April oe tin c. Wood, California superintendent of schools, who kept the Better America Federation’s propaganda out of the public schools, paid his respects to the state of the nation at the convention of California school principals here. “As a result of wartime propaganda,” says Wood, “America today is the vic- tim of false Americanism and medie- val bigotry.” He gave as an instance the charges of reactionaries that lib- eral thought in teaching made the schools hotbeds of radicalism. ce A TALE OF TWO REPUBLICS RUSSIA AND GERMANY Shown deer Place Majestic Theat Am. Cloth. Wri Empire Theatre Eagle Temple 3 .National Theatre .Central Opera House .Rialto Theatre Star Theatre .Family Theatre -Northwest’n Turn Hal/ Spencer Theatre .Avoy Theatre .Lyran Hall .New Turner Hall -German Amer, Home .Workers’ Hall “Dania Hall Hall Chicago, IIlinols TOLEDO COMMUNISTS Will Debate TOLEDO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AT LABOR TEMPLE AUDITORIUM SUNDAY, APRIL 27 SUBJECT WILL BE RESOLVED, THAT THE REFORM OF CAPITALISM OFFERS A METHOD OF HUMAN PROGRESS MOR’ BENEFICIAL THAN THE E METHOD PROPOSED BY COMMUNISM. The opposing teams will be three and three students of This Debate will be Educatio Admission Only 25c. and Entertaining. Bring this add along with you. members from the Workers Party the Toledo University. Don’t Miss It, REMOVAL NOTICE Please be sure to address all Letters, Newspapers and other mail to our new address. THE DAILY WORKER 1113 W. Washington St. Chicago, Ill, BUNCO PARTY AND DANCE WOMAN'S Local 278, A.C. W, of A. WEST CHICAGO. ‘MASONIC TEMPLE Ge - Oakley Bivd. Near Madison St. SATURDAY EVE APRIL 26, 1924 Famous Orchestra Admission 50c, At the Door 756 a