Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, June 13, 1878, Page 1

RS R VOLUME XXXIX, WIIITE GOODS,. : REGN =~ - WHITE " 600DS. GREAT REDUCTION! PIQUES, Tor Children’s Wear, at 25 cents, ALSO SATIN BROCADES, Made from Eyupttmi Cotton, for Ladies’ Wear, 25 to 40 cts. Field, Leiter &.Co. WABASH-AV,, Between Madison & Monroe-sts, MINERAL WATERS. AP LLINARIS NATURAL NINERAL WATER HIGHLY EFFERVESOENT. APTROVED by the Academicde Medcelne of France, ‘teneh Govern o Now York o Kreat hiful beverago, Usctul und very azrceablo. of elealntul ang wai 3 itesale i T'ranco autiorlzed by apoctal order of the smurnt. summendeii by fie bighest MEDICAL AUTHORI- L roltef for lel‘ltflkn?ll." i ‘ar superior 10 Vicliy, Feltzer, or any other. ost grateful and refreshing. brulutely purs and wholesumes aupertor to all for 3 free from all tho objections ursed sgainst cn and artincially serated waters.”, in- Fegninted only with ite own ges." 10, woll-sulted for Dyspopeia snd cases grees well with dyapeptics, sod heate. eable, slone or mixed with of Btomael or Bladder, and {n Not only luxury, but s necessity.” To b had of all Wino Merchants, Grocers, Drugel ana Nlinoral \Water l)fl]m lhlnfllnuu{"thu Il“l:& states, and wholssals of FRED'K DE BARY & CO., SOLE AGENTS, NOS, 41 & 43 WARREN.ST,, XEW YORK. Eyery ;.’enlflnu l»gtue Lears tho veglstered Yellow sletorinl Jabel of th APULLINARIS COMPANY (LIMITED), LONDON, Apollinaris Water! FUR BALE DY GROMNES & WLLRICIK 100203 RANDOLVIL CHICAUO. TS EST ENDHOTEL, LONG BRANCET, PRESBURY & IILDRETIL, Proprictors, WILL OPEN JUNE 20, 1878, Transtent Toard reduced to 84,00 84y rates according 1o location ani her Improvements Amonyg ot! VATOIS bas been nuded, led, and 0] ter Batling Establishment inproved. L AN Applications Xow rocelved by D, 3. HILDRETIL at ow Yorks al o ilfoniwar, New X ot the Hotef after May o by G O, PRESDURY, GRAND UNION HOTEL, Saratoga Springs, N. Y., THE LARGEST AND MOST MAGNIFICENT BUM- MER AOTEL IN THE WORLD, WILL OPEN JUNE 15, 1878, ROOMS CAN DE SECURED on aoplication at the METIROPOLITAN JIOTEL, N. Y. HENRY CLAIR., Manager. BLOCK ISLARD, R. I TIIE OCEAN VIEW HOTEL, enlarged, opens July t 1tis situntod on & Niull averiooking this Ucesn, ‘whera there aro no hented or malarlous breczes, and the wind bluwlug frum the Oc ere excessive hieat (inpos. q enn re stile, ’nunnn—h\'ncmmx. ¥ishing, und & cood Band of Music. * Prices circular to accordance with the tines, sond for FICHOLAR A iy LL, Prop. UNITED STATES llOTlflL_,' SARATOGA SPRINGS, NEW YORK, Opon for the Season from June 16 to October 1, TOMPKINS AQH PIGEON COVE HOUSE, Tigeoy Cove. Capa Ann, Mass. Onen Junci. Thists ono uf (ho plessantest houses on the Cuant, i, K. Fugland Mits, K, B, RUBINSON & Co. OIL STOVES, OIL xumpsor STOVES ! 3 805 nflfi!fi%flf?‘a‘.\f !hlmrr Hvrhll and $1.60; 0, $4, Ac, Two-hols tops, $1.60 sod cks, 330 & doz. ¥2.00, * Drollers and Ylat-Heaters, 0c: Bieamers. 75¢; Teaskellles, ©3c. At THE OILASTOYE STOLE, 100 Stato 8to G Directly opposite tho Bostun Store. &3 01T . B e T T ] DMANASSE, OPTICIAN, Tribuno Bulldlog, Floe s LAviDRY L3 W, bladtsun-at | 420 V7. PAICE\ES pestacies subied to all slghts o0 sclontige prin: eiples, Upera wad Ficld Glasscy Teleacopeh Micro- Scotes, Buromelers, 4¢ TIOTUGIRAPHIY, = Photographer Taku Elavator, 76 MADEON.ST., nets, B fISILIRTS pr pleco 1¥0 CUFF & L. 0. L. COLLARS prdos 350 CUFFBordos 100 Thezo aro our Specialty i ary done equal 10 ew.” Kenl by wall o andulpd | 101 Clark-se e Chicage Bailpy Teibune, CIIICAGO, TIIURSDAY, JUNE 13, 187, PRIGE FIVE CENTS, S A TOTAL WRECIK. | 2 Winerssin notaaseen™ o 2 [0 0 TIE ORIGINAL OF TIE NASH AGRERMENT, and related the circumstances. Anderson was In Washington about the 4th of March, tooking 1 | The Character of Anderson | for an appointment, and called on me st various men were there in April Anderson informed you he had letters from Matthews? A,—Llie certainly nformed me, and I think he showed me n letter from Mntthewn of an Infroduction to Judge Har- an, or something of that kind. My recollection ia he sald something sbout having such a letter, and showod it to me. Q.—DId he tell yon what he wan going to do In conrequence of that introduction? A.—Ho told me he had called, or wonld eal), on llarisn, snd my recollection 18 ho did call on Ilarlan, MORE THAN ONCE PRESENTED the letter of introduction. and conversod with Har. 1an. Idon't recolleet what ho sald, but he pald ba had & namber of interviews, and ho told nic at that time, a8 I recollect, that ho gavethat Weher agree- ment to Harlan. That is the thne he foand the ;Yreement, and he aald bio had sent it to Matthews, y recollection ie that ho saw that flarian was promised some position and delivered him the docament, Tle says he sent it to_Matthews, but my recollection 18 he gave it to Harlan. Q. —Thon you knew he was sent with a confl dential letter of introduction from Senator Mattnows to Ifarlan, and he was visiting Jlarlan ‘hack and forth, and that he had given him 8 copy of the Weber aflidavit? A.—Yes. Mv recollection ix that J never knew what was in that agreement LT saw it in print. —Didn't you ask Fm then what the Weber aMdavit was it you did not know sbout (t? A, — Certainly. y tucoliection Is he etated to me that it wae an afidavit to the effect that thelr protest ‘was not legal, Q. —Which document did he tel! yon ho gave Tiarian, on your recollection? Tuo onginal or the copy? A.—Tho original, Q. —DIdn't you say to him, **\What on carth did Harlan want of that™? A, —I don't recollect our had bean dfscansed In the papers and It is to be ln:moch everybody knew what it was, ).—Pardon me. " If you tell ma what fa in the newrpapers you will tell me s great many things that are not true. \While yo are testi(ying nnder onth, therafore, don'tdo it. {Laughter.] Did he refes 10 newspapera as hia sonrca of informniion? A.—Neither of us referrad to the nowspapers, erand the name written in thors seema to be in tho same ink, sithongh not in the ink I used. Andersonand 1 wroto ovidently from the sams Ink. The offic I1 & Iarge one, and wa bavo & tablo on which there are two or threo inkstands, -Did or did not theae two nersuns, Anderson and'the other person, write their names to that Jueat in youe presance} A.—1 will not he vositivo shout that. They may have gono ana used other A imes. Shortly after March4 Iealled on the Gone ENflrely to Preshlent, and !stated the reasons why Anders Pieces. son should be appoluted, which were because uf » thoactive part taken by him {n the Loufsiand elactlon, and that ho wana Yery Intelligent man. About a woek after our vielt to the President, A ow, what soarce of inforinstion did yoa wive him about tho Bherman letter in that conver- ratlon? A.—My sogrce of information was 3r, {;:‘tller. Chalrman of this Committec, and what 1 Q.—Do you recollect sceing them writing_the nmlunl In your offica st all? A.—No, sir; I do not. €).—Aro yon able to stato whether the names had been put thore before they came to the offico ar not?! A.—~The signature of Andarson was already thiere before they came to tho ofiice, WEBER'S NAMB WAS NOT YAERE, ond [ called Anderson’s attention to the fact, Pt WILDER & DICKS, WITNRISES TO THB DOCUMENT. : Wasmxaroy, D, C., June 12—H. A. Wilder sworn: Resides in New Orleans. Anderson catled on him with & friend, and safd he had o document that he and his friend wished to sign and acknowledee before a Notary, but he dida’t want any questions asked about it, and he asked mo §2 T thought it could be done. Dicks spoxe up and sald certainly it could bodone, That it could ho ackunowledzed withiout a Notary’s knowing the contents, 1lo then asked Dicks and mysalf 1o witness these Lwosiguatura to tho paper, 1 wvan busy ot the time, and SIEARD OF IT through him. ). —Rat what informstion did you gZive him ahootthe Sherman lettor as distinclivot A.—I can recoliect nothing a4 distinctive, Q. —What Informatton did he glve you about the Sherman letter? A.—None whatever. Then the Sherman lotter was spoken of 83 a matter thet you two know all aboutt A.—Cer- tainly; it wan A WELI-RNOWN THING. qr.‘-n was after the Gth of April and befora the 101h of that month, you saw the papers Anderson hadr A.—Yes, sif. Q.—On tho 10th yon had learned yonr candl- dature was up. In old Saxon, your cake was dough, and the papers wera not any lunger inatra. nientsl in holping Jou-, Why dld you wunt them on the 16ith of Apri}? “A.~1 cannot give you any information ss {0 that. Jcan'texplain that telos gram., Q.—Let mo ree If T can belp you. You had jast becn beaten, Were you not as well satisfied then 10 have the papers publisued? A.—Oh. no, sir. 1 had no such Iden s that, not at that time, derson called on the witness and sald he and Nash had quarreled, and .that he was going to exposc Nash. In othor words, he was **going for him.” 1o atated that he had s paper that wonld roin Nash. He thereupon produced the Nash agreo- {"f.{“' Nash later oxplained to tho wltness that ho 1 He Is Proven to Be a Perjurer, HALF-PAST SEVEN Loafer, and Black- FridayMerning,| - == How 1o Fell Out with Nash RAIN OR SHINE' und Fell Into Divers WE WILL OFFER Tniguitics. 2' 7 O Darrall’'s Testimony of Value Only in a Negative DESIRABLE = Nobody Found Who Ever Saw the Much-Talked-Of Sherman { Lotter, Only So-Calied Copies of the 50 OTS, BACH, | oocument vavo s Appeared. SIONED IT 1N A POOLISH MOMENT, and oughit not to have done 80, but cared nothing abontit, The witness niever hail a conversation about thie so-called Shernwan jetter, but it reemed from other convorsations ho bad had, that there wos such 8 document in exie! a, His knowl. edge of it 1s only what ho had beard from Mearrs, .;fy:k- and Auderson, whose stories were contra- clory. ‘Tlie witness sald that Anderson had stated to him that the document was signed by Shorman and Etonguton, but the copy that the witness saw was \ nlgnea by Sherman ouly, and was entirely different from what Auderson represented, Anderson had stated to the witness that his parish was tereible; there wero 8 goo( that e ‘wae safe there, and mentioned | Sonversation. 1 cannot give the words I used, but Q. —~Afterwards you told him he had better plteh | jnany people Inmy oftice, and T rumember aigning, {ldt o Itapahllonn wavsate (here, bn 198¢G 1 [ expressed much surpries that Harlan wantod that | {n A.=There is Bt ‘ono expianation f can give | et 2hbn T took i and. (nitoduced Mim. 1o Ber: 1o that telegram, for I am positively certaln I raw the docunients previous to tne 10th of April. About the time the appointment was toade, and 8 few days before I went home, Packard notiled ma_ho had telographed Anderson to come over, and had sizned my name to the telegram, Anderson having a better scquaintanco with me than with Packard, though ne was weltacquainted with us, That may exniain the 'antter. (), —Lut Packard was beaten Lefore you began, and you wanted to antagonize him,” You were heaten and Packard too by thio 10tn of April. ow do you cxplnin that Packard wanted the papera? 'fhey wero no longer a reason for his appointment? A.~I hava given the best recollection I have. Q.—Now, then, when you ssw the papers they dlun‘t eeenito you tohe of any conseguence? A, — Well I wonld consider the Jetters of Matthews and Sherman, If otivinale conld be produced, as IMPORTANT LOCUMENTS, Q.~When Auderson showed yot the papors where were you? A.—It was In my own room. Q. —Who wsa present? A.—Tho only gentle- document, Q.—1n answer to that surprise, what did Ander- son ssy? Letmehelpyou. Didn'thessy, '*Why, Harlan promised if 1 would give It to hita he would help me to get an office, ** or words {0 that effect? A.~The effcct was that, of course, llarlan ond -“.Q,"h‘l.‘l“d'"nm wocure him an oflice, N — DId you express sny surprisc to Anderson thatafter B{lllhcwl and "ll‘ll;”llfld been $nformed Quthhu had msde a fraudulent sgroement with Noal PROMINENT REPUDLICANS INTIMIDATED and unaulo to vote, Anderzon exhibited hin coat and vest where he had been shot. 1 think his poeketbook or papers prevented hiim from buing wounded, but his cost Was much torn, and he told_mo qulte & lengthy story of his having been followod at night and an attemnpt made to assassinate him, and about his escape, ond he sxhibited ovidence of the shooting. 1 saw several parties in tho same parish on tho boatat the samo tima 1 did Andereon, and they AL HIAD TR SAME STORY, that no man dared aay ho was n ltepublican and dared to vote the lebnblican ticket, The witnens said that Anderaon, when at home, wna much disslpated, and, although his reputation might be considered bad In the Nortl, 1t was cop- sidered good to falr in New Orleans, iy Mr. McMahon—After reading the Naah agree. ment, did you revuke you_ recommenddtion for the appointment of Anderson? A, —XNo, sir. I nover wroto the Prestdent revuking tho rccommendation mour, whose offlco is only two or three doors frem ours. Q. --Ts that the signature of Dicks, your partnes? A.>-1t is, unless it (s a very good counterfeit. RS2 ).—Did you observe tho* gentleman fricnd hia spuke of whu was with bim? A.—I aaw the pentlo- wan, Yes, sir, ‘i, —Who was he? A.~I do not know. }.—Were there two signatores on_the front of the paper maden your office? A.—I think they were sizned in my ofiice. Q. —\Who catried the paper to the Notary? A.— Andereon carried it, I think. Q. ~—1id you see them wign thers in the prescnco of the Notary? A.--Tam under the impression 1t wa od [n my ofice, {.—Whether the utlier mumnture wers .pnt on there that day o- aftor that you know nathinzt »—According to that {um tney could not have been not un It six months afterwards, becanss tho Notary's jurat is above it. ‘Withess stated Lo had scen minco a brother of AXD A PALSB PROTLST, that they should promiso. to give Lim an office? Ko have 10 dohBE T ald. o you remomber so? Ar—Certainly, "~ How Ald Anderson meet that sorpriss of yours? A.—You will have to hslv me out. ez can,' Did e ot say b wor om- ployed by Matthows tu watch the Packard people Fopmim Ao, T At heat of it O T Or--And to report 10 Harlan sbout 1ty A,— 1 never heard anything sbout the Packurd Uovern- WILLOUGHBY, HILL & | pMatthews Invites Slippery Jim to L2 Mr. Weber, whose name he witnessed, and that CO., Boston Sguare-Dealing Proceed with 11is Bx- e e e o (228 YALE0 | Gy atan surprise you that Harlan wanted o | BFCBIHLu0C o, s myarlts - Sir: | one whi aigaed the saper, s on 110 te Q=W hy wan Andereon. fegarded by you s0 fm- | Consult this mant A, -y recollection is that I | Srjit'saw portion f the pr (s R ] 4 et H ; supposed ho wanted him for the . | Smith saw a portion he papel saibly nll of —=E. L. Weoer, thon, was not the man who Clothiers, Tailors, Furnishers, posure; . T poriant a petsonto bate In your deatings sith e e i tha e, 0 PPUse Of €O | e, T examinail them and he The only | way in_your oflice and mined the vapert A.—I thing that I recollect us being esld by cither one vf the gentlopien prescnt was some uxpression of sure prine or astonishment ov the patt of Mr, Smith that such documents or pepers existed, ‘out were not surprised at tuolr oxlstence? Hatters, Shoers (and sell Boots g0 cheap we might almost| And Is Very Confident thatSystematio .—Yon were surprised that he wanted to rive ‘him an oftice, bat not surprised that ho wanted to consnit him about an ofiice? A.—That 18 about the don't_know who wined tho paper, but the man deecribed ns @ tail ony And dark-complexioned, with o black moustache aud whiskers, was not tho man who was {n my ofiice. him to being him uver Lere to afd in securing the snpport of Matthows? A.—Anderion represented that he NAD CLAIMS ON MATTIBWS lea. ¥ Q. —When did you first learn from any living be- 13 GECN. DICKS claimto be), FREEBOOTERS | Forgery Hos Been Prac yhichhe wanro youid o bl sy, tad b | it D B o R WEAMELTE | ATOU 00 U, e ot anptiog o s | Tpr Ty cortobiried o tetony of (0 --“Smoke?” Come in and get ticod. eood poatlon BIONS, . Ly erit to Andeton, | S508 e Tebtors T s satlaged ioaraod 1t Trom | 1hEro tnat day? A =Sottiug except the Muithers PN arging him o writa to Matthewa In yonr belialf ro. | Anderson lumself. ey SMITI. a Pipe, R E g the Now Otleans Collectorsllp, evan after | & —\When you arst heard of it what did you hear ML At .T;"\V:‘xu":’:cu“““l“r' b ftwas? A, —The recollection 1'havo of tho | fooll letters? A, RECALLED. The Senate Investigating Com-= | fuc quirrel batween Auderson and Maithews had A b o letler | yop giri and I remember Smith expressed somo ' fa that It was & letter given by Mr, Shorman and Mr. Stougnton to Mr, Anderson aud Mr, Weber in reply to o letter sent them by Anderson and Weber, statingg that they had made returns {rom thelr parishes, Q.—No. Youarenow telling me what i3 in the Weber_letter, 1want elinply to learn what you learned tho contents of the Sherman letter wery shout? A.—That it was about the fact thatif thoso gents would stund drm by the Kepublican arty, and mako thelr returns and do thelr duty, hey would be rewarded, and THRIR SERVICES WOULD LT REMEMDERED by thu Admiuistration coming i puwer. —DId you think it at all hisportant as a letter? A, =1 can't remember my thouglits back six months or a year. 'Q.—Can't you tell mo whether yon thonght it was fmportaut or not?! A.—Idid think so; ves, sir. ‘Wasmsarox, D. C., Juue 12.~Thomas C. iI. Smith, late sppointment-clerk in the Treasury, vas recalied and examined by Gen. Butler, First saw Jumes E. Anderson alout the middle of Junc lust In his ofllce. Anderson came there nlone, cither Lringing a letter to wiiness from Senator Mattuews, or clsc the let- ter had been received frum that geuntleman by mail. He bad not yet ot that letter, and did vot koow what ho lind done with it. It wes In regard (o Anderson’s appolntmont, recommendlng blin In the wanal lorm, Q.--1d you find any latter concerning Anacrson on the files of the olice? A, air, nat wyself. After leaving the oftico T applle it weak for auch letter, nnd was informed that no such letter was on tue dles of the oftice. [ wis shown 3 lettor from. vccutred? A,—Well, T knetr that Matthowa wae well-disposed toward Anderson, even after tha conversation belween them in which Auderson threstened the publication of docaments, and that hlu had rocelved letters from Anderson after tuat tine, Corner Clark and Madison-sts. Branch, 532 Milwaukoo-av,, cor, Ruckor-st, OPEN EVERY NIGHT TILL 9. MERCMANT TAILOMING. BATZERT'S $25,‘ $30, and $35 SUITS Lead Al ()lhcrsjl_style and Quality. “THE ONLY” Fingt-Class Tailorig Hous MAKING ARTISTIO WORK AT LOW PRICES! mittee Will Commence Work To-Day. , 16. Vhy didn't you tarn to Ancerson and say. *+You lisve been dacelviui mo all this tioe; you told me you had an sgrecment from Sherman und Staughtoy, and now it turns out yon have got notulng but & eop{ of 8 letter from Sherman, What dld you mean Iulllnz e these lles for thia_yenr or more?™ DId yon make any such ret wark to Anderson? A.—~No, sir, Idid not. Witness furthor rald Anderson told him he had representod to Sherman and Stoughton that ho sud \Weber Bad rendered scrvices at the risk of thefr lives, snd that they swers advlsed to stand flrm, by Sherman. *‘My recollec- tion 1 Stonghton did not take vart in the personal iuterview, bnt that they were not lull{ satiufied with his verbal assurances. ond the nest day Anderson und Viober wroto thess iwo cutlemen a letterand recelved from thom o letter n rerard to it * THE INVESTIGATIONS. A I'AIT OF TUESM NOW IN TltoanEss. Suectal Disvatch (0 Tha Tribune. WasniNortoy, D. C., June 12.—Tho lengthy cross-examination of Darrall to-day atnounted to about tuls, so far ns Benntor Mattnews was concerned,—that Darrall and his friends, learn- ing of Anderson's letters and papers, attempted touse bothto sccure Matthows' assistavce in the matter of the New Orleans Collectorship. Darrall's testimony, in connection with Ander- A CORRECTION. Darrall eald ho_wished to make & correction of his testiniony of the ‘lrflflolll day os printed. In answor to a question it uppeared he aald, **up to this dste no appuintments have besn had oxcup! on rocommondation of ‘the Returning Board." ‘Witness sald he meent up to the dste when ho lert ‘Wasbingtou, some time in March last. Of course he knew nothing that had transpired since ho left. n snswer fo & question b{x M. Blackoarn, the witness sald that yostoroay Lo walted in tho com- ‘mitteo roown until after 1 o'clock, when, dosiring to ses the Presldent boforo leaving the city, he went to the Scnate and informed Mr. Kellozg that ¢ t | Q. ~Now, it heing an important letter written b; 3fr. Conn, tecommending hini. son's, wlll probably lead ¢o tho calliug of Justico | 1o was Zoing to ths White tasee, and J the Fory 1 Gatiafaty of 188 Treasiry (o8 Deriutor A & | gevaie Chemir g (s Tatr, Ssnsionod sy | 1, dyorWas there mota than ohe letter passed bo- Harlan to explain his custody of somoot Ander- | find him thore, Upon ruschiug the Whits House, | loafer, did 1t strlko you os o strango clrcumaiancs | the suoject of Anderson's Intorview, saying that tween you aud Stanley Matthuws In rezand to tha that you would forget? A.—1 Lave never furgots : aopulutment of Andersun? A.—Yes, wir, and [ ten 2. think [ sent him a telegram alac at thu request of Audorson, Q.—liave you a copy of that telegram? A.—No, r. 4. —Tlave you cither the telegram or lettar scat by Matthews! A.—Ihave ¥ . A LCTTER OF MR. MATTREWS. 1t In ga follows: MaTryEws, RANsAY & Marrozws' Law Or- rick, Nontiwesr Copxen Pounri axn Vinm BYARKTS, CINCINNATI, Juno 22, 1H77.--3iy Dxan UExEnaL: I have your: favor of the 20th. First, no one {4 under any oblleations to Auderson. waw lhim on Ihe care going to ULaltimoro. e toid me Lo wes sutfetied. 1f he doea uot chooss 1o take what you chaoss 10 offer, drop b, 1 promiscd notuinz excopt to do waat § could to hiave him reasonubly provided for. Recond, ua to Mellrath, 1 cannot speak defl- witely beeauso I do not know the ealarics pasd, Of courvo, If hu enterd the wervice for the fret time e ought not to expect the highest grude. Do fue the Ecreennt-at-Arma overtook him, and h turned forthwith. lio had busiuess with the Pros dent, and hearinz he was going sway desired to »a0 him befora ha Jett. BHATL® CHOBS-EXAMINATION. Question by Butler~\Whatdid yon sdvise Ander- son to do in regard to those jmpors? A.—Shortly sfter the Comtnitteo was appointed I received a letter from Andorson stating by .intendod testify sng somethiniz on that account, s 11 § wrote a lottae teil I‘l.nl him to do wo; -that ho had not been treated night. u‘(‘).l-\'on advised him to plich in? A.—~Cer. inly, Q. x Didn't you expreas some opinfon as 10 theso njiors In his possession? A,—Perbaps I dide 1 ve no distinct recollection. son's papers, Darrall testified that Anderson always declared to him that the protest wos tiue in regard to intimidation in Fellclana. Nash aleo gave him an explanation of his slgnaturo to the agreement bearinz his namo, that he signed 13 1u 5 foolish wnomant when Auderson waa threat- enfug that {f ne aid not he would revoke his protest. - The three witnesses called to establlsh the fact that Weber signed the Anderson-Weber agreement, namely—itio two witnesses to the paperand the Notary who aflixed tho jurat— sworo thiat the paper which Anderson declured to bo a forgery was tho original and genulna paper, but nuno of them knew that the person who appeared befora them and sigued the namo of Weber was actually Weber. Bo that the Anderson had ed upon him ana 4POKEN VERY ROUGHLY TO M and had raado threats of Lhe pudlication of these documents or something of that kind, and that he tola Anderson that = he felt very mmuch tmrt and Clegusted ot that action, that ho huad® oeen doinf ol that no conld in sccordanca with Anderson's swishes, and that e ed 101d Anderson that he did not want ta see bl nny further, and that he mizht do as be pleased with the papers and. d?&umcml. and that ho would drop bim, apd he eald substantislly the same 0 me; that it was 1O use trying to do anye thing with ruch & inan, or something of that kinds that ha was unreasouable, and cxpected lim to do miore than be could do, and that hy dono the best he conld under thu cireumytances, und that by was determined Lo have nothing further to do with Andervon. 3, —Then can't you toll us when yon learned that importunt thing? "A.—1 bove fixed it asLearas I can. Q.—S8omo time prior to tho meeting of Congross 1n October you learned of this Sherman letter? A.—1do not say that posiiively. 1 huveono way 1can fix It beyond auy questioning, That was the dute when Mre, Jonks called oo me, carly in Jan- uary, ond stated she bad sucs u letter, bat 1 am satisllod § learnod of it from . Anderson previous tu that,—previons Lo January, Q. —Now, then, you had learned from Anderson that be had made afalso afiidavit: that there was » fair clection when you belleved thers was an un- fair one, You had learned of corrupt agreemont with Nash. You had lewrned’ he ghad got B letter you thouzit & _ very Strange ono. and you Rad learncd from Mrs, Jenks that sho lad somctblng to do with that Jetter. You wero about being u candidate for Collector, and that being the condition of things, you wrotd Q.—Don't you rewember saying to bl some- thing in that lettor, something like thie, to o aliead and pitch into'and axposy the Pasim-slglng ypocrita, und that his papers would do ft? A, — ain inciined to think 1 said something of that kind. 1 know I apoko quite warmly in rezard to it. SEYMOUR. , =« HIS PRONT NAME DEING WILLIAM. to Anderson to holp you? A.—Yes, sir. y him the best you unde; } t o 179 » 181 183 Weber's stzuaturs i concerned,fis stiil open; | leaner Aoo=Xeh 0SB0 1otk ed¥the Republican secount of lavisig thoso ducusiontat A.—Cer- | Eeymour was sworn and examined by Mr. 3e- | -~ Adjourned. - and the presumption that it s o forgery 1s | Administration in our Btate, nly; certanly, Mahon. e —— 3 J A e i e hickbarn: Qs -eItave you In the conrss | Q-—Andyou expected o get into ofico upon Where do you reslde! A.—In Ne RELIGIOUS CLARIC-S Atroger than gyer, of your iestiony bofors tho Comunitteo told of THE PEANS OF TUE ADMNISTRATION, Q—Whore dai § " . ¥ T—: GEN. 8MITH, LATE ATPOINTMENT CLERK, Wil The efforts yoi mado to secura an nppointment | throuuh some urhu- ]u:nchllll n:‘r'nun:l Orlelm.' OPEN TILL 0 1% M. CORNER MONROP. | was oxamined by Gen. Butler with the evident } for Audersony A.—1imagine so, publication of theso documents? A, Q.—What ls your occupation! A.—f am a | CHICAGO BAPTIST ASSOCIATION, = —Didn't ver have any interview with the | 000 of tho moans. $ g g Spectat Dispatch o The Tribun RITOLS, purpose of showing that tho President was o M‘g;‘_m' .'1'( s{;‘[‘;'}fl Tie WWY’, 7 gbbiry "mm; ., —Tha no of the crutches you wers to | Notary Public aud Commissioner of Deeds, i une. Eray, 1L, Juns 12—At the cecond day's meeting of the Association, devotioual exer~ cises occupied the morning hour. Mr. Luw- renee, of Chicago, gavs an nddress upon * Bible- Ciass Teaching,” and remarks were made upon this subject by Dr. Blackall and athers. An ad- dreds upon **The Benelit of Benevoleuce in tha Sunday-8Bchool ™ was uado by the fev. E. 1% Savage, aid remarks wero made by the Rev, A. Biuckbury, of Austin, Mr, M, R, Burtree, of Chi- cawo, the Rev, Dr. Hewitt, and others, Prayerwas offered, after which o recess was taken. und thy annual sermou was proached by the Rev. C. E. Hewitt, of Chicawo, 5 ‘Ihe clection of officers, which easued after the closu of the Rev, Mr. Hewitt's sermon, ru- culted us tollows: The Rev, A. M. Bacou, of Dundee, Moderator; Mr. 1. W, Padetford, of Elgin, Secrotary 3 Me. John Sutcliff, of Wheaton, Preasurer. Mr, Cadetford read th letter frum the Elgin Church, and Dr. Cheney added a few words of welcome, Tho R 1. C. Lelaud, of Chicago, opened the afternvon exerclses with devotional excrcises. ‘The tirst Baptist Church of Warrenvlile, and the Central Baptist Church of Chivago, were roceived with the Assoclation, Letters were read givine statistics frowm tho seve eral churchies tu the Assoviution, party to tryingg to roward Auderson after ft being proved what his character was. Soith's auswers wore such as to tiatly contradict this theory, and soon Butler, not recelving such an- swors as he wanted, began bis usual attempt to bully the witness. Geu. 8mith, however, was not particularly affected by tho displuy of rowdylsm ou Butler's part. Dut this at length became so Jusufferable that (ien. Cox rose and demanded that Butlershould be compelled to behave bimself. Hedenounced bis bullylog. and his conducting a grave investl- gution alter the method of a police-vourt speech. (3em Uox was dignificd} but very earnest, and exceedlogly seveie. The sudienco aud the Committes were in full sympathy with Cox, and rojolved that this legistative rowdy was thus sharply rebuked, Butler attempted o swagger- {ng and offensive reply, but Cox returned tothe attack in still more sevcro terws, and dcMabton also LOW SHOES. A full line of Summer Shoes for Men, Women, and Children, in all the dosirable styles. A large stock to select from, and prices always thelowaest. BULLOCK BROS., 149, 151, 153 STATE-ST. ENGLISH | s Caianated shoen ‘ICJI-?IPUKSETNS- Ch AL 0, Q.—Were you acquainted with James E. Ane dersont A.—Yes, sir. Q.—Wero you acquainted with J, O. Q. Weberl A.—No, sir. Q.—There s been & paper produced before this Committec which seems to have your nauio und seal attached. Plesse lovk at it sud ses whether you can indentity your signature nod seal. A, (after looklog at tbe paper referred to)—Ycs, sir; that is my elgnature and seal. Q.—Stato snything you know about the cxecu- tion of that paper, 1f you know anything further than by scelng your name there? A,—This doca- ment waas sworn to beforo me at the date It pure porta 10 bo given by Anderson and some other gen- tieman who was with him, Q.—Did you kuow tho other person with him? A.—1d!d not GNL; PHOX TOE FNTRODUCTION at tho thoe. Q. —1low waa he lutroduced? A.~lie was intro. daced vy Mr, Anderson us Mr. Weber, . —Uild you know whethor or nut it was Mr, Waber? A.—1didnot. 1xnew tho withcases. Mr. Dicks and Atr. Wilder, They are claim-agents or nttorneys restding in Now Urleans, Q. ~Was the fusido of this paper communleated to you, or did thu parties just present ihis part of t and #ay thoy bsd sworn ‘to itY A.—=That tu all. 1 Jusi saw tho Inside. 1 was not ma did go with him to the Sccretary of Htate, . —-Oftener than once? A.=~I romember once very distinctly, fur the Secretary of Stato wantod 10 know whether wo could get the UECOMAENDATIONS OF TIUE DEMOCRATIO MEX-~ it wuk walk on? A.—Caru\nl{ll ~Whether the right bower ar left bower, we woil't 82y tiow, 'Tho recard shows you worked up to the best of your abllity that right” bower? A.— Certainl! Jow, sir, do not you bellove you falled coples of this matter had got on your con- sclonco; was not that it? A.—Iu niy opinlon, either myself or womo other party suggesied by Anderson would have been appointed but for the fuct that It was known that copius of these doca~ ments were in &muunlnn of other parties, and that they wero viriuaily public property. Q. ~—I1f theso ducuments bsd not Ueen publlshed you would bave_Ubeen williug to hove owed yuur loction to the eforts of & porjurer nnd' a black- mailer, with false documents, as Collector at one of ;’l;u ||1|I|c|pnlanleu! A.—You have stated Bim ta c BERS {mm that State, ond possibly I went a second ime. (. —llow late was tho last Interview yoa had with the Secretary of State in the Interest of An- derson? A, —That | could not say, 1havo no wuy of tixingit. Thatwan in 1877, 1don't think we called un the Secretary of Slate more thsn once. “Tho Tottor of April b was here called Lo witness' sttentlon, stmply for the purpose of refreshing hie racollection, Q. ~Didn't you learn from Matthews that Ander- son was the firat man that had suygasted your name 1o tum us a candidato for the Coliectorship? A, —1 Lavo stated taat already, , ~Itad you prior 10 that time had any conver- satlon with’Andorson sbout advocsting your claims 1o the Collectorship? A.—Cortainly. Q.—When aid you first_have conversations with Anderson on that subject? A.—Tuat would be ono or two days broviousto the Interview with Mat- too ‘ou yuureelf stated It now? A.—Notof my own personal knowledze, Q.~—-You knew tho wau tobe corropt. You bo- 1leved his ntidavit so be false, You know hle ac- quaintances would say 1E WA A DRUNKARD, . ond you knew that nllugkthew documents for this Purpiose was slmply blackmailing? - A.—Cortalnly, . —Then, haven't you siated sl that 1 lave? A.—Suostantially, —'then wc don't subatantially differ, and on were_sorry yuu fatled. A.~Naturally, Laughtor. Q. —You were not surprised tofind Anderson nger from Matthews to Auderaon? A, —Not Q.--Did you call upon Matthews by his sending sormu! .—Dy his sending for me’ througn An- erson, . —Dldn't you writa to Anderson to come aund seo you sbout yoor candidacy? A.—Iwrote hma uumber of lettery, . ~Itepcated? A.—Posaibl TOOK BIDES WITH COX, as did Motrison iu bis ruling. The fecling smong the Democrats seemed to bo that But- Jer's manners and mothods were proving 'too SUNDAY-S8CHOOLS. ) d 80 BTATE-ST, bieavy 8 load for their sid to carry, Tho bear- T epeateis Ao very likaly Iaid, stall, e mretta of 1t, "Tha Eentlumen deomed | Cr FaLts, lows, June 12~ hir- ———— = Ing of Gen, Cox fu the matter is highly com- | ¢ “ltopoatad? A1 Wiye 5ol an exnct recol- & You knew, Hatthiows know Anderson o be | very seticeutavout Cammuniath tho CONIELe, teenv.llu-‘:mi:l n:n of lhuolo‘w'n g;l‘::n ;ul";_ . STARCI. mendea on sl sides. Under hls second arsalgn. | lection whether 1 w Wirat oF he. — Our corro. | Just what youdid xcept as fowhat lie friends aunIPuHhIquflunn 10 thewn whther there way b u hought of him? A, —} think be was generally well kuown to Matthow, .—Now, then, fn regard to that Interviow, KW you saw Matthews ai bls house, did yout ' A.— spondence wai Ar, Hutler (nterrupty sbout 1o become a candidal ihe Government. Slere was A DHUNKEN, MISERABLE FELLOW down In Loulslana, or had been there, —a man whom you hud learned had got s corrapt agree- ment 10 hove the Nuval Oficorship, = You, & mew. bor of Congress, who had not yot been unseated, aud you were ahout to mske an application, Doa't Jou know whether kst rascal camio and mado an offer of services to you, or you went to him? A,— Weil, str, Anderson and m{wll had bad a conver. sation 1 regard to tho Coilectorshilp before Ibee came a candidate. Iu regard to Packard— (. —Leave blin out. A, —About mysslf; Ican't awear whatber tho suggestion came from him of e, or from soma friend of wino, (. —1 mean the augyustion that tho laafer shoald take Kmln it. Thats what | A.—Itee suember writing Auderson about that matter, -, (. —Didn’t you write him 10 come over and belp out? A.—1 wrote bim & nunber of letters. Q. (sharply)—Didu’t you wnite bim, before be said anything 10 you, to come aud help you? A.— 1think 1dld. Q. ~=Dow't you bellevo you did? A.—That's my beal recolleciiou; unless Luaw tho letter I could uottell, ). —Whal Indaced you to go to Philadelphls for this miserable mun to IIGJ'HH n that caudidature? A, vd Andersvs had suggested L to nics of timos, and It was s0 uuderstood, le bold s paper or documents that ihe puwcrstnat wers would bo WILLING AND GLAD 70 LISTEN 70, Q.—When did ho mnake that statemont (o you Brst, leaviug vul 1oe Weber snd the Nash agrees ments? A, —Boww tinie previous 1o this dute,— umb;u;{ & munth. - .—11d Anderson sy anything or write any- day-Belivol Asswciation convened at the M. E,° Church in this clty lust evening, which had been beautifully decorated for the cecasion. The Conveutlon was called to onder by the Ho, £ Melendy, snd, after approoriate lucul e erclses of welcome, tho Precldent, K. 11, Gil- miore, of Cedor Raplds, took the cbalr, aud de- Livered his respousive address, The annual ud- dress was deltvered by the Rev. D. J. Burreli, of Dabugue, The convention gl comiss of belug ona of the ever held in thy State. Detween 200 aud 800 delegates ars present, ropresentiug 4,000 schools, “Iho sew son will close Thursday eveniug. WEST POINT. The Annual Visitation, Wesr Poist, N. Y., June 12.—The Prest dential party arvived here at 11 this murulug of the Governweut steamer Heury Slth, leaving the cars at Jersey City, und gofne directly to the boat at 6:30 this raorning, and taklug lunch on board, ‘They wero met at the wharl Lera by Ma}.-en, Schotield and other oflicers aud o troup of covalry and battalion of cngluecrs, Carriages wore also (u waiting, aud the distin- guished party wero escosted to tho plateau. Tuo Corve uf Csdets rucclved then with preseut arins in frout of the barracks, the baud playlur s [all to the Chief.” At the same thne tho Prealdent's saluts was tired. “fhu visitors were cicurted to Mag.-Gen. Beho- fleld's cottage. ‘Tho party fucludes President aaythiog 1o 1t that would be unprufessional for mo 10 #ign, \mylllhly that would appeat ridicalons and soa-professional, and Anderson waid wo, The docuiucut was signod when It wus broogit 10 i, 1said to Wilder, **lv 1t sll rizntr" " He camo and INTRODUCED ANDEESON TO ME, Q.—Let s call your attenuonto one or two pecallarities in this document, Do yon notice the fact that **and D), A. Weber™ apdears to have beun added after tho jurst had been writton? A.— went of Butler tho latter sat silent, and for once hoappeared completely bay, Ha has fully exposed bls hand as 8 bitter enomy of the Preatdent and all frionds of the Adminlstration, At prescut ho scems deaperaty at Lis utter fall- ure to mako a polut egalust sny of them. TUB MATTIEWS COMMITTEE. The Scnate Investigatiug Cotnwitleo appolnt- el ot tho request of Scuator Matthews mct this aftornoon, ‘The Chairman, Senator Edmunds, was detalned at home by {il-bealth, and Benator Alllson, second on tha list, vrestded, No rep- resentatives of the preds wero admitted. 1t was It is_packed in Pound Parccls, | declded to permit tho Assoclated Press to Lave Full Weight guaranteed, 8 reporter present when the testimony is taken. It costs loss monoy than any | genator Matthcws was reuested to attend, und Starch in the World, hs cspressed a desire that the Commlttes It is manufactured in the heart of | 1 uld commence smmediately. According- tho Ereatest cercal reglon of hO |y e Coumitten dircted that sl Y penss be fssued to Auderson and Darral It is Sold universally in america to appear to-murrow at noos. It s probable by OroaerE AN wnsion roaches | tiat Auderson will b tho tirat examined, ud Twonty Million Pounds that othier evideoce will be introduced in re- = buttel of his testimony. It was understood ANDREW ER'&E.:‘TB‘RECHER- that tho sessious sbould be short uutil after Erlenbrecher's n-.‘,’,,, -,.,,;,,’,:, Corn-Starch for Food, | Sdjuurnment, whea they will occupy the entire FAVOR & KNAUSS, day, as Sepator Matthews Is auxious to bave Bole Nortuwestera Ageuta Chicawo, | tho matter settled. Subpanas wers nnenl;:d ou D1 ~owior. | Avdersou and Darrall {o the reom of the House DISSOLUTION NOBIOL: Iuvestigating Commlttee, ERKENBRECHER'S Bon-Ton Starch 1a absolutoly odorless, and Chomi- oally Pure, * It'is snowflako whito, 1t is suscoptiblo of the highest and most laating Polish, It possossos groator strength of body than other trade brands. ~—DId he send for you, or did you go volun- tarllyr A.—1 ed on him at my own suuvestion, ,~-State tho frat thing you recollect, that either of you sald. A,—1[ ‘suppose you muan nn{mmz that will besr on this case, sud effoct & pol ! nt yon want to nake? . —You havo nu oro dea of the point I want -Do you temember your attention belng to that or uoticlng it at tho tue? A,—I a0 almost pualtive thut I callud Anderen's asten- tiua to tuat fact, sud tho fact that Webor's nuine ‘waus not on that ducusuent, or st luast hix nsuo way not juserted, aud 1 had the correction made when [t was irst presentod to me, It was simply, ** swarn to bafors we this 16th dsy uf Navewber, 1876, vy the befure-nientioned James ¥, Audur- sou.” 1eaid, thero ure Lwo gentlemen to thls, aud the other nanie must bo fnserted. ~And tnen wha faserted tr A.~I doo’t knuw who inssrted i1, but somebody did, and 1t ls not in my handwriting. }.~—110 you notico te fact that your own algna- ture ls sigued on the lino tmumediately below An- i\-uu\g’n. and partly beueath 1, 80 s to lap uver? .~—Yes, sit. And the words ** Notary Public™ aro still furthar 1o thu rigal, on noxt Hoet Wwr—Yeu, sir. Aud the sigastury **0), A, Weber™ s pul ween the word **Anderson® and the word Noutary,” and on tho wame line with your own uignaturo? A.—Yus, sir. Q. ~1 will gak you whether you wero in the habit of putting your uwn slzasture fu_thst way gpon the samo iine with that of other partics? A.—Yed, wir, sumctisios, o inake than you bave of the Indian lnnzuage, and 1do not intend you shall. o on with your story, aud lct iy polnts alone, A, —Tho first thiniz that L recollect v that 1 wtated to Mntthews thot it had cumo 10 1y knowledge tint certaln copius of thuse docaments, or papers, oF whatever they ware, wore in existence in the newspaper vfica of tho Now York Sun, und that coples uf thom oF the urigluals tiad been ofered ta soua parties tu New York rup- rervnting Tilden. Qu--Do have any recollection of spything occur- ring befure that lu that futerview? A.—Wu probe ably dlscussad this matter of thu Colicetorihip bo- fora thet. After [ told attnews this about the pa- oers, he inforined he bad the sawne Inforwation from sumu Democratic source, aud Lis statement was 1o the u:l!m that b did not’ cary whether tho docu- ment, 80 PAR AS 1B WAB CONCERNED, was delivered to other partics, or purchased, or bought, or what was done with it. W theu dis. qusscd What Iscalled the Shicrman letter, 1 toid blm what I'had hoard in regard to its exlstence, and, If 1 remuombor distinetly, he remdrked toat he did ot bolteve auy such 1tter had ever Leen welt- wa, aod no original was 1o existence. Duriug the interview It wes woationud taat Anderson or pare ties represunting bin—— Q.—\Who incutioncd 1t A.—It was mentloned by wyself, aund Lo bad heard tho suw, that pare . —Look at that paper szsin sud see whethar zhfi wards * u5 Lhnp.\vlmln::nenuontd Juuws £, DISSOLUTION. thibz o you oboat sny docuwments, leaviog out two | % BYSRATLL X s would diaposo of thoeo | Andersunand D. A. Webar® widnt oot have beed | jiayoy aud Mrs. Hayes, tue Becretary of War, Webarand Nush docutacats, Uil you wrota bim 1 taid hom Abd s added at your, sugestion, and that neither of the Prests Tho firm of tearns, Dans & Co, 1s this day dissolved DARRALL e h { documunts, aud I told lum Auderson bisd been over od i Gen, Bheroay, Gew, ns, aud the Presis Ly mutual agrecmeat; and notice is horady ghveu tnat ANDBRION'S TRSTINONY BADLY RIDDLED. aboat, oF asked ki avoat, such Jocumente? A | hore ut ' reaucst of mine, and 1 luquired in | Pirties el utioned 'tn tbo Juratt Ac—=Yem | jioty gon. Speclal excrclscs and drllls are to soqurd to thu papers oud documonty, and that ho had sssurcd mo they wers jn- lls glacmnluu and would remaiu safely there, sithews rewarked thut, in casv of my apuoint- meat, or the appointinent of sowe une suitaviv 10 uv, Anderson should givoup wll documents and para that Lo bad, and fore¢o sny claums that he ou bim (Mattliews) or the Adwinistration. Yi Q.—Whera? . A.—To the best of my rocollection my first lctter to him 1o cume wust have been dated fn Philadelphia. Anderson was here imumg- distely previoas 10 the recess, oz jmmedistely afs vicr. for sowe time, sud I bavu beard hic state that o Jubn W.Btearasis slone authorized 1 cllecs tbe delts | \asninorow, D. C., Juue 12.—The Potter sl e s nine L UQUIGHDN | rpanys, | Jovestigatiuz Commiitee sesumed its sittiog CUHAS. D. DANA, to-day, Mr.Morrison presidiog. E STEAUN Darrall, of Loulsiana, was examined by Mr. Cox. He stated that ho first saw Anderson fn e beld this atteruoou. - Gon, Sberidan srrived at 10 0'clock this mora- fug, sud wos recelved with a Major-General’s salute. The tirst closs examivation closed yes~ terday. Its staudiug will be aunounced to-inor- row wornlng. The Light Artiilery drill this afteruoon was YQ.—WBII‘V:{ was dono was Lefore you aizued By Mr. Butler: Q.—And you azo certain thire wore iwe gentivmen thurv L0 make vathy A.- Chicago, Juna 12, 1678, alr, Uno was the wentleman bere {polutiug Yei o Auderson) aud the other was tno geotlewsun who was {ntzoduced to we. UGUSINESS UAIRDS. IIAD LETTERS VHOM MATTUEWS, oo e crrmenmncenees | (ho 3pring Of 1877, whien bo sald that the pro- { gnd other pavers busidos the Weber and Nash doce . —You bave spoken of tho papers goncrally, .—Do you rowcmover whether Audorson kel L s e o Bad made was correct &8 regards lntim. | Gmients, - | cauiin't 07 tho xact date, & ton hevespokenof tho pavers yonerallys | gud Wike! “Sieued tho gumt 15 your prew. | wlbasatel by the Fresiions decretary of Waro @~ \Withoat Uxlug the oxact date, will younow | Matthows introduced tho Shorman lutter by sayiug | Suce? A.—1 think tho sigastures ou thy face | Cund. SRR SRSt CRVEI G EURY fho swear that that was fiuuu tho bolidsy recess? A. | ho did uut care about the papers. su far ad ho wus of tha document bud olready been sigued by Webvi ety o Ly 6 aud Andersou. 1 then called stteotiun to the fuct l\;nllhuu 0lb'fl ‘naute had not becn sdded 1o the budy of tho jurat, B arwy, AtS5p. m. thero wasa battalion drill, wud tho corps of vadets was reviewed by the President, accom ¢d. by Geos. Beliotluld, —1 could uot. cungerued, uxCept a8 1o the Bucrman letter, Iid thows iatroduce the lllhf ect of 1Lo Shernian 7 A.—1I canuot recollect who et spuko Guaitt idatlon, < it ol ":?‘w.'fi?“x';’i‘?hv. Blortly after my conversstion with Potter, Mgputscturer, od Sadiei st | Anderson told me that he bad scen Matthews —Waat s tho carliest duy that you can, recol, —— e | and tbreatencd bim with the publication of Tosk ibat you knew auytblug from blm thas ho bad otter Uru of tho Bucrman letior, i 3 them or claimed 10 oave them?! A.—Ilie Q.= ook ‘st the elgaaturcs of Anderson 2ud Bheriday, aud the Becretary of War, FINANUIAL, documeats, aud pletured to Matthews the scan- | disicult for me 1 H iranan Yo | OfQ Dok Muelivet of s comlug fn ta aay | Weber sud viste whother ta your judguuut they | Tu subual Lop of the Y i AP SUBSCIIPTIONS REC NDS. | told-Anderson that if ho was fucliued to puraue | (i, "B¢ause be so fuformod e, and Iom of the | Q.—What be fo substauce sala was, that o did NOT SIUNED WITIL TUE BAME INK. Bherman aud dsuguter, Gen, Sheridag, Geu Bchotleld, Geu. Vau Vilet, Geu. Augur, Gen. G Gen, Devens, and Mrs. Oldersbaw, of {cagu, and otlicrs, o Presdeut aud Secretary of War leavo fur Now Yurk Lo-Lorsoire Amrun n_that o infuriwed e sbout what is catled the Shermnaa agreewant olther before ue ju- wediatuly sftor tho bollday recess, 1 can'tre- micber 01!1:"‘. Q.—Now wa havo it that whea tho visitins atatos- Dot caro about anytuing clic, but it was the Swer- msn letter that was unpuria Why didu't you say, *Mr. Matthows, what Is tho Sheruan lettéet Didu't you eay that to bimr A, —There was uotuing af tha kind sakl ‘Tha Shaswan letter ot tat 4ud . e s .':;Bn“ er coat | i3t coUTIO Lo mlgbt go oo snd publish any- bt . f;""“"if’f{'?‘":::’ v s Fore i dinie e i théuxz“:l: ?.“‘:f: "Matthews sald to tho wituess Ly and Lo rs A s ubscquen! o '8 & e Lizanseifbionxs e | )0 ould Bave uotolsg fusther to do with Q.—Wera tuo two Audersun siguatares inado at the samo time with tho sawo luk sud pear ‘Tho tuk is not the wawme. ‘Fho- fuk that I used on this occavion and the ink that Andereou uscd Wis cvidently the sawy fuk, and tho sigusiure of Weus