Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, November 5, 1876, Page 7

THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: SU. NOVEMBER resentations that “ad ‘been made. H ; - BT, 7 F 7 Z blmscft aid not"re; : DEED ¢ e | stating the rulings he ‘had made. The Tufer- | Mr. Mosés believed it was bt £ ') self-defense. ir i 1 If the | because I cannot agree with the .Times_defense “Leofal -gourse of the m:f,“&?fu’::fif?fi’ g:){;“%; k‘g rofifl:v:':f:f;flfflc gl:(sn‘}gg_fig:nifeemust%:s McAllister. for the Association jt‘.’as tmtge']:um: zfii’gfln&e‘%mbmfimfifigfl ;n:eg; reg:sgu;: of Judge M:A‘}llstcr, and telling th‘e catrier my 5%?’523‘9‘3{53? toithe Btate Leg"?“.mm Bo t 135 over, on acdout of ‘the -SAILation. on the | Jer e, tie subject of self-defense tvas the | actionat once, - .. : . .. | toabswerme, and does not onmy démand i | wish, I'was otably struck by his'remark, that | Rochester, Minn,, has t Yy ersince the | Mr. Rosenthal did not thifk ‘from ‘what e | mediately contradict his declaration,and Leall | /02 i 'o %t ok on ‘his rounds that | Fellows’ Halls in the szfis&%&&nodd. 2 iqati iseus bject, he - i e Bar Associadtion Discuss |32 e -gave some attention and -made | Selfridge tri d i THhi some ‘fnq e The ™ remt was " that e | oo ulzd?gs Jfl uexanbc ground or ather the cause | had heard that there could be any but a partial | him a dog, and knock the dog down, *the law | 3 5% G0 morning expressed the same desire. | Brother P. 5, 1876—SIXTEEN PAGE cALLISTER. P 5 A R 0 he killing belng ‘¢ reasonable | investizati i i i 3 h b the Fee.sxhihty of In- became gafisfied that there iwas ” 4 e e vestization at the present time.” If there was | presumes Lhad just provocation.” &gl right, . Shillaber (*‘ Mrs, Partington " sty . wide - difference of . opinion 15 to s th’fll e g’fi,’,‘fifflg_fim‘g‘;"ficfl,fi’;‘;‘ ““‘ls“‘hfl“t interest six months hence fn the % say! Then, if the cowardly anonymous- P""’:s"iL’;&ggfi:’;gz}mflgg&w‘;pfigfig 1s the Boston correspondent of the c@é‘«wfi i i it ol G eI i, aod | FRN 2500 i, Wt dudes MeAlltr | mater, i onstnet o bavetgted.” | Ielfrypter e mpudons fn SHSBDU | oo Vamos Svants. | Dotk the gk e pears nearly sty uow Aty : ut it.. And at’that | defese as an abstract guestion, but the'iden of | suppoatd the fiatter Bad . boeh Brought up/bi- | danker of dreat. bodily Mati p st dve been opened ‘in fn- moment he hiad no decided opjnion as to what, |- giving instractions which ntise of | supposed the matter Bad beén brought up'bi- | danger of éreat bodily hari.” To this all AW, diana, s i : ctually ice duriag the cowr giving instructions which urlse Wwhere a man is | cause , they could not afford by— alr-mit htprae Ay f CHANGE THE LAW. . # : oo fo Arint o o | g ook, e Garie e core o o | Esalfd ncn i s wes sl . ey ot to Lok e o T D | e woncA i salter. for 2t 75 the Fatlor 4 The Trivune. © At St..Paul, M., the. Od-Fellows aro Tt Ts sllggegt,e to ppomt 8 'Com- _to himy that the proper time | —reasoning upon the theory, or % D 0y ce of & matter of ,cowardly anonymous-lettér writer for s it e t the end of ! for fnvestiation was now, because the public | thot the Judee ought not o A0cide oo eraing [ kind. Too maiy things had dlréady beén pass- | tempting. to rise, with my. cecond-hand plstol, Cmcaco, Nov. 4—A'provision at the en building a hall which, when completed, will cost mittée of Thirteen to judgment was made up on an uncertainty, and | Whether “the man was assafled a‘flfifl on. |'ed by . the Assocation for ‘it 1o . be | the law presumes I ncted in self-defense, and | Sec. 437, page 411 of ‘the Revised Statutes of | $50,000. WSS -8 ostponcment was. not equired or deminded. | 3 - question " of 'fatt, Tor _{he s s Setlon fos sy S We do' Ml | the veedes mmuse b Jusisabls howidile L o | e, or e St ot Dt e | sl oot f the-Srnd L _.charges were true, as m: cortainly [ A “great © n s (Pl X0 1o » | thi i éurselves rigl s Inst, and to the whole theory of Judge Mc- | o3 " the people be ‘dllowed an appeal, Writ e of Kansas'was Lin the City of Wichi- . 0 D0, s 5 e, certainly Teaf many - good " - people—people | with the :publicand rieht with our own organi- | Allister’s able defense of shmvxfi:, all mén, ‘up-. chieball the pe,:flm,f]_h_ At the 'n_ex{’ :_csé;m:x ot | taOct. 10 and 11. » d actlan was demanded; if Talse, action was plso | who did not desira v ' & of ¢rtd ackso good Soslom was Gelnanled 1 3 sl esire; to do any one fnjusticé—read |*zation.”” ‘The most he had henrd said'was ¢ on cool” of crror, or new_ &rla. A% TR fiL. 1 : : Shomdbe nufi%&?fifi'?rfi;fiflaéfifi%&cfi: el statements and. fudged ‘Mellister by | SfcAllister. was “blindly T e | B these prople imane whais T hebebhes iy | our Legliliture lot that be repealed, and o poet- | . The Oeder in Tacksonvile, TiL, feels tha s osition Is Debated ap | Asocation, when thcy could determine what, | not, soi "qucstion Vas whether, thore wis | miRed 1o ave the YOUDE Eaauis. 1Te beckiste: e | Lok afe SORG in 1Enorinc and finaticismrand; | tive provision enacted {hat tho rizhts of the peo- | efecta of Lhio.sessluns of the Grand Bodies ro- The Proposition Is ebated at | action should be taken. 4 people a\fdngfiefmgg‘y 0& P‘.‘g\““gnbdom,the thoiight he Wwas innocentof the crime charged | thirsting . for. my, blood .In . the case Je i mutters of oppeal dnd new. tridls snall cently held in that clty. 2 : Great Lén'gth for ‘Several seom : . || Boople god the cow f%; “Aex 1}; dncts of ‘thie | against him. Al McAllister yas "charzed with | have made, 'and would hane me in s minute. | be the same as the rights of the acéuscd, and a | The Grand Evcampment of Trdiana will con- 1 GHAYE e Foquens o B S Judze MeAL. | S iten t Judie Mol ter ruled rightly | was a blunder. 1f the Assgeiation was going to | They hold that the vistt- to my nelghe | véry strong incentive will be placed béfore odr | vene in annual sessfon in Indianapolis Nor. 2, Hours. flg Xt the re &d ot camle hirodgh 'Eflbv‘i‘\: 1'!’1; AL dnmmin‘;?ng ly ‘Fns a°question of ‘finelegal | take up blunders committed in the aiministra- | bor's honse under the_circumstances 'is ‘pre- Judgesin criminal casesto do'justice sccording to | and the Grand Lodge on the 22d. y TR B Snl s s aaaunE o dtacri mnzlm ] {mhllinr ‘Association had moth- | tion' of justice, it -was prétty Iate to begin, | sumably unfricudly, and what I call ‘reasoning | Jaw. Now a Judge knowsthat be may make such JFancti 5 S50 ot ] tion Cits e aapposed thors would bo o im- | ing more to do with hs declsions us to thelr ab | More serlous ‘gnés hed beery committed, and | with:thie coward for writini the lettér they call | rulings agaiust tue people us o chodacs, an2 2 | o anction, Lodgs: (No. 650, ok dunetion Glty, opriety when any of the Judges of the Courts | solute sceariey or. fnsceuracy than 'they had | chargés'made against members in, court.aid on | an angry assanlt of “ords ind " gestures threat- | long _as, ho avoids positiye and tangible mal- | ety o Drethren 61~ as . M e h every ruling made every, day. The only | thc street, yet no nodee had been taken'of énluzgl‘:’ayrm,‘uhll'when T knocked him down | feasance in, office, he has nothing to!?m:._elther are coming to theirald. . e n i G 5 The Odd-Fellows' State Mutual Afd “Assoca- icd'and his motiye S 5 S ? motives aseailes they claim that | assanlted him_with Yiolence | from a revigw 0f his attion by the Supreme a JUDGE LAWRENCE ¥t 1s Urged that Tmmediate Tn- ed—in | question, for ‘the Association, if it made an'in- em. i vestigation Would Be Un- e pndze bringing the matter beforo the'Asdo- | vestlgation, was, whether Judge MeAlister "The question was Ihén piit 6 the ‘#@dtion'to | withont provocation, and tliat my ability to so | Court, or. from the Legislature by way of im- | tion offndiqua bad but one ‘degt plom- wise, administration of justice, 'and :asking. that 'the whechcx'msnfix: O e i . POSTPONE INDEPINITELY, casily, fell the dog proved my superior physical | peachment. | g I ber, on which a beneflt of $2,32%.60 Was b ); lings were o wide of the mark | and the Chair-decided it'agreed to. strepgth, and that shooling the creature whenI | ~“There are three things col ected with the Twenty yéirs ago thére were in bhe j o accusations against him be iovesti wlflhnvte'\: o “:ini:g-ixulzfigg;fign%g&n; 1':‘;:“;1 lawyers could infer that he acted cor- A division was called for, and a conntshowed | bad him so completely in my power ‘Was ‘mur- | late Snllivan trialin this clty bard to understand: | 450 of Sullivan’s Séoond Trial Ts Pending | (oveh the tfifu‘l'they omia. protanty dore | R W, . ing asked wiat was fo bo | ol 008 2 6 the motion ves can- | dor. To Mo n vaip, ihat T explein to | Firshynny il the presing JUS, ZoSim ar | e 8 “Pent Tou; *ord gs. ! v & KC . . TN i F: & v . at B . m; & fe | cow: i e possession r = C > A g gl - {fic orainary sourcés. He ' doubted, | the - effect of the eport -of 8. eome | My Bleck offered iho Tollowlg, which was,| and. brother with e all . "boud | the touri-room dod a{;;fmu"wdmss, S thear | DoDerslip ol LS, sud ¥ amniat revanscof \ Ontarlo, only thirteen lodzes with, €05 did the grcshflnz Judge, ‘who is 110 | members; now ,t.herey ace 156 lodees .with .a The Matter Inflefihitél‘y-rm- however, the JY{o'pflcty of ‘institutiie an inves- | mittee, , He did, not kuoow, ‘'but h dopted: |—th: i g i i ¢ tigation of this sort on -their own motion, | did know that the Bar was divided on e | adopted: .. on the ‘same -friendly errand—that I tell thetn | and shout, 4s L saw,them do_at the coming in BRI e e o i 2 2 C ques- |z ; i s spis that my wife got lier face scratched, and th before the; The "Odd-Fellows_of Memphis, Tenp., con- poned. S8 withaut buing - sénucstal - 5o, 05 | Hon ot Tua ORaNiy oF Jadas MoARmen e, | il Thsptin Fiditiy Comtice Ve fa- | CUELALS FONCT e GRS SR | S alagia, g i Fuake mo sieps | trbuted from e yellow {ggéwzge?g% t0 io it | o ore i 60 by the gentleman = whom hey- | ing d t e 0 1 t Lt e, 75, and if the. Committee reported tinanimois- | at its nest meeting a 'bill to be ‘presented ‘to the | in'vain thit'T'explain to them what O'Brien so ¢ had the i % ‘\’\':{ekflb‘:ng; rn::wn fi:‘i‘“fi.‘.’f@“fi;nfi‘fg .did | 1y that they were right, the Assoclation, in his | Lesislature of Lliinois foran ach &0 provent, by | fitly ealled my + kind Christian thought Tt 3‘1}3{@‘;‘;&? dfe:?l?(&rgzmnc hhlls command, | ¥ick sufferers. They. would "have contribited The Legislature 1o Be Petitioned to Al | the jurisdiction of .a 'rygm 0 ;,-,'9 Lo t“““lm opirion, wonld notunanimously, adopt their re- | Proper penaltics, the adyértising in this, State by | I would shoot the coward in the leg and maim | and could and should have cleared the room at $5,000 had it been needed. 1 b condust o jadse dh n'mui-‘v.\%r‘ t;lfi ate the EOYL He, juding from the newspapers, did not | A1Y person, or. persons, in any.\way, of au notlees | him; and that shootifg him in ‘a vital part was | once. It was not o question, of tasteforthe | ‘At the institation’of 'Peru, Lodge, No. 539, ze | trial any more | believe his rulings were correct—that they were | OF 0Mers to procire divorces fiithout publicity or | pyrely a_blunder, Sk s any gentleman was | Judee to decide as to whether the tumult could [ Pern, Ind., twenty-Seve - member Were ro. “1ow & Change of Venue for thie b el i Sk B e ; ¢ ity 2 7 : occupied th ity of revions resids f pariies, O thi o gk s . b 2 1 Hy 0 People stineol e i dno bvSaniio s | el Mo s e of e b | et Wl Sniiaedhs T i | WDt U ViGST BRT IR, | PSSR B 8 oounts | S Rhi e Gy 3 i G 8190 eculiar {nte * "they" p Rat o1 W | ete., contempla prot “the law: - o5y i > "courts of A il S 3 ering - fato, ‘fihér ga;z:;‘g‘?; 'tr‘;glcns AL \\"h could they do?’ He thought e had,.from | finsts with reference to divorces. ~ - angof 1l say ,anything _more, , about . the . matter; it | should be preseryed as a court, and continte to og[e,n{;‘_ % Cm"m!‘:, X verh ] Sk s 5 The nuw balls of- Acton .Lodie. No. 270, and aning to the end of the'tyial, commitied | yudge Lawrenco remarked that it lind béén they Gséumed'a power ‘of ‘that ‘sort. Ifo. was | 2 8650 many blasders; yot he (o e ot e v, o e T | e D Bronc make it all right with the widow, and see that Why was an instruction given that e - T : wér “of that : lister) was | sponacy, 0 romake : Whén Demanded by the Stdte's Attorey, | oposcd'tolt tnless a réquest was .made s Le | the man, Lo determine. . What Judge did not | Srave Uiacone ol tie.qiceis of ho dssodation | ste ai ldren have choush{o ‘¢at. And which was in effect in conflict with Sec. 56 | Windsor Lodge, No. 317, Indiana, wore lately was toaid in the mm(n}szmhmotmsucoqmanc et 16 eptat o thon, 1 Jadze Mo fory 3 iy Code (Rovised Statutes, page | dedicdted by the Rev. B _Fal'Fos.gel;k Snm}:l Lsce A, J ooy had sugeested, and hoped the motion to post- | make mistakes? There was a Supreme Co 12, k. iy urt to s s ) in Oases of Murder Indictmerits, ponewould prevall. Gorrect the orrors of the Jndses botow, and nua | Deased leave to offer a resolution that the Chalr | ‘yjyieyr e s s | OB o, s Ropataled | retary, and the nciv hall. : ENE MR, TG ... |moiwton they “could'do. It,was n pity it o committce of ive to. present o8 fa- | jypicioiciol With whick T aid all my business, en e by it section mumished g a ctime? | No. 103, s fn réadinoss for dedication. iend Sy Xt E‘;I?:‘Ed o2, &\:\:fl t.l\é:s ficc,s‘ofitlgaagnd“ anofi!btcen/ :le:&c :;xi:),: ‘o‘;l?thcl!‘l?‘ hf.n dbqfly =!‘1,n v&‘or- sl 13! o, 8d0pted, requeshing and therefore no special malice was ‘to be pre- | The Judge did not use the word “‘concealed,” | Tne Order in Cinclnnati has a ‘¢ Revival Com- i MeAllister’s Rilisigs ‘Trvite Tim. | O st thesigwestion of Judgo MeAliister, | rect, some ‘of thele bluers for they | i iyt paa i uiHoring thepeoplo’s | Sl S0 U8t the Wl AT NGt be e | Bt D mes LR SRR L SRRl R R e | TG eing wbous s nereased Interes e i G (- » LA g U mage a g 1805, rother, Aale g i $ BEw)C = ‘! e n t 3| ‘migration to ¢ nm Chicago.” that the objection that they hould wait until | rence, knew very.well. , [Laughter.) If a com- giiiney; mfl‘xz A'GHARGE OF VE! more difference. to. those. bigots % mplearned fn | the hnguagg to the fML’-l before them, as 1t Was :vl:)rk_ ‘%’h;.n& ]me m“fiiommfifixu"mfi McAllister ~ or _ some . other. . persons | mittee were appointed, lic. hoped. t Would bo | wnon indietmonts for mauedcr, He thought the | the 18, us Judge MeAllister says, than it did | of courde fatended the shonld, 2o | 47 Revivalsiare the order of tho day. tate’s Attorney had of- i et i upon , the bench requested ‘action | as | one that would not whitewash Judge. McAllis- i P ta Berry,—~they would hang me if ‘they eotld Third—When the i S % 0 THE LAWYERS. ntcutble, . TE s, eonduct “wie. sueh | ter if guilty, or conviet imif ho onght not to bo | Smebad come i ol Jares cller of the Stares | eet rope ‘ex’l’nugih. Do” You mow blame | foiod an nstruction concérning mansiaughter, | AL thelate session 8t the Grand Lodso of THE BAR ASSOCIATION 5 was represented by the press, he was desery- | convicted. It should ‘be 'a fafr committee, | to gecure o fair.trial in meny cases of P hder. | me for wanting to leave here? hich_instruction the Judge supposed to be Eansas the,'Grand Represéntatives, were ip- ing of impeachment, In. that event hewould | which would dojustice to all ‘sldes. , Soinc of & ; i o 50 butls to tha famous trial and nottée | orfonsons, he refused to give it He, howevar, | Structed to vote against the proposed aménd. held aregalar semi-monthly meeting at thelr o, aeE Bay ciom A 1 8., S of | 1t was ensy to. do _soin spme; but in,mostot | BOY ¥ o {us th n % ! - y circumstances, requost-an do- | the gentlemen thought the prisoner’s interdsts - spme; but inmost of | o SRR 0T e chief actors. and Incidents | thought the whole law of ' the case was not fair- | Iment to the Constitution. changing the name ot yooms fn ‘Farwell Hall yesterdsy afteraoon, | yostigation, I{ his sconrse. whs. justifed. by would be feopurdised. | Werc thero o oifer | pacim.thore catered cloriente mhith ter ferec s | connéited'therewth, ~First, T will say Ido 10t | 1y présented to the jury in sud 2 fia BOFiair | the Grand Lodge of ‘the Unied States o Sa- Président McCagg fn the cliafr. " | Judidial pracedents, ho was deserving of vindi. | intercsts? * Had the pieople nd rights? Gite | gt or politles, in. Othets ah climent of fell. | ihimk Habford had thoronzh trial. Prosector | tlons offered by The Pedple and th defense, and premo Lodge L.O. 0. F,» e sttendance was unustally Tirge, sinco it | cation and indorscinent by the Association at | the people a ghow as well as the prisoner! Give | ion, e I g T et | Reed beemed from th first determined to screen | therofore, and properly, gave sdditional instruc- je innual session_of ‘the Groad ‘Lodge of wasunderstood that a resolution was to be fn- the eardicst possible day. In that event, McAl- | the prisoner dl} that belonged. to him, but give that one or more persons could be g6t upon' the Hanford ahd bis terrible crime, 'and much of his | tions of his own motian. ~ (I do not discuss their | Arkansas was held in Little Rock Oct. 11, The {fotnebd with reference to Judge McAllister. lister, as-a matter .of delicacy, and propricty, the people all that belonged to them! Some be- | jyry, who Were incapable of ‘an honest ndmints- carly life was suppréssed or concealed from pub--| merits.) - Since The People had attempted to | following officeas .wero clected:. Jamecs Bond, ul W o callister. would ‘not request, them to indorse his course. | lieved that MeAllister did not glvc the'people’a | $raiion of the layw. 3 lic view, and we are left in doubt as to what | present the question of mansiaughter, but, in | Grand Master; J. H. Holland, Deputy Grand . The Treasurer reported that he had Feceived, [ It scemed to him fit and proper, if the Associa- | fair show, and he ‘was “onc of them, judging | *Mr. Goudy. ‘called the. Judge’s attention tothe | M3y bave been his edrly carcer, but the | the opinion 'o?the ‘Judge, failed properly to pre- | Master; C. B. Maore, Grand Warden; Poter - diios the last meeting, $200, nd patd Gat'S1s5, | tion was Gver to b anything more than a.din. | from the 'newspapers. ‘He might, be entirely | constitationsl provision, siying ‘the defendant | JiaW, présumed” it. to, lave been bad, | sent.t, why did not he, usa just Tulge, predent | Brogman, Grind ‘Secretary; George S, Morri- Jéavitg the balaiice in bank, $1431.04. ner-cating. organization, that it should move in | mistaken. :Djid McAllistér cotflxpfig‘{gepfiw shonld haveattal in ‘the %flcl hore ‘the | 80d with |, ‘this 'vigw the, iwhole bench | g proper instruction concerning the law of mag- | son, Grand Lecturer. 4 Tt being stated tnat there were ninety-digit the matter, and move at, once., It was a duty | the'people of ‘their'fights? It was difficult to | crime was committed, asking ‘if it was'his opin- sgreed, . Justice, O'Brién _ dclivering * the | slaughter? Sullivin. killed a man. Maybe, it | {ys guote from a'lette BT P oy Fheing e jute wors, Wi f% | they owed to themsclves snd to évery Judge on | make “the . Associatlon . or, oy one else | on, il viéw of that, that the people could opin | GFiion of the Cotrt apd.closing with theso m- | *as sanslaighter?. Waa It not i to Talorm | g ou e Sanace . Midgieys e BB oring iheniters In ‘arrears forducs “for'the Breseiit | the’ beneh. Ifa tithe of what was nss'm%% was | Delleve, that ‘e corruptly, withheld from the | 3'change of venue bgainst mf O e the e | pressive words, “Hanford is dead, andT came | the jury of their duty if they should be of the Gng;d Correspinding ool K the Right-Worthy year and quite a nutiber for the provious years, | trucy M(:Aillisterashauld bo removed from aflico | People Tihts beloneing fo thom. _He had |- ciseq, 5 Dear'aaying QuEkttobo damned.” Eightinors | opiuland wes mane aughter] Assumlng thet | of the Grand Lodge of the Daed: ‘é‘i&:‘?&‘;" sme discassion ensued as to why the Board of | immediately, and the Association, by virtuc of nown Judge ‘McAllister 2 good many years, | - o T sl a by s | oand alarge of.the audience indorsc the Judpe was ‘honest and of soun 4 3 some discu 'y it (8 log, by siztue of s . Judie Livitnee sépiled that thit bidtignt'dp | Goion f_fit e Court, by hearty applauseand’s | cannot Sadorstand it. Ynm}. ete., # | uri o the joninut of proceedings o 1uf0: st ® e minds & its organization, was suthorized to take acti and always believed him to:be an honest man. i i R rins. el ot Astgzcte i not naks Wl e What | by o oo e seton | 1 ould Tak great dat of evilonce o AKO | Hongead a dieric v be, Trobaiy o the docy | o087 veles 1o fachthe whele el busbrep L A I R R ] 0 2 5 b 5 }Mr. on_suggested, in answer .to the ob- | a'good many members of the Bar believe hat t conduceted 80 as to strikc a healthy “dreac . § S - o i3 A P Rbe Dresidont said that ft was in the power of | Mo auson Sugkested, I anever {o the. ob | b haa. aciad. corruptly, howerer much Hhay | sy hen mould De. robrimnivad, il distiets | CTery ieirh, of tho témible nime which bas been MISCELLANEOUS. gy e o might alffer from hilw'in his rullags. “He:ald | &2y which thero would Ho'several Cipule | committed. s an.evidence of this Iyill men- ‘THE HONEST JUROR. a just considération for. the sablect, 33 well as the Board to exéuse a meriber for nion-payent | for which the Assoclation was organized, as g ey thonght propes, alienn e Soncinion, s 1he promoion | 2t blere S ommLE LIS S ARES : ;" sie | ofthe due administration of justice. "It.sceme B alcs His intention'was to simply pring. the subject ‘The Treasurer remarked that some of thise | 1o ypy {riat the matter_came Tairly within the | Wore solected to teport for or against him. e on Lorits soni e ol xfifi%fiwvc = Spolinted who | Judges for the speedy pdminisiration of justice. | Hon thio romaric made N e one of the STt | he memibers of the Scilor Classof thieNorth | Wolt 54 proper Slscerament of atjle. Iwishle ith The Contract for the printing of the procead- Shuch foellng . and | Division High School, of which the late Mr. to the Court and audience,:) Hanford was principal, have sent Juror Bérry | ings of the Grand Lodge for the session of Oc- whis had ot pafd did not intend fo boie’to sy | scope of that object, and that 1t was the duty of |. What good was therc in suck a report? Peaple | "My, Evans thought Judge Luwrence had omi . more meetings. the Association carefully and fairly to inpeti. | would believe as they beliéved now,—one ‘part cefi e el Hieh entesel icc had omit” | &1 hope this will ‘he a warning to allmen bere- | ‘the following letter: , | tober, 1878, has becn awarded to Mesars. Knight M. H. W. King moved {5t fie Bosxd report [ Este and commend or condemn as the facts hat Lo had arred, and the other part that ke el pammeriom.? . after.not fo write Anguymous, letters Thisis| 3, perry—_Deaz Sm: In cominon wilh 't & Leonard, and judzing by the prompinéss dis- i Nt s . - Judj aceg] ‘Rmé erit. Areg s a o t ‘mass of the commanity,.the -pupils of the.| played in the production of the work in udge Lawrence accopted the dméndmerit. | P FUR" G ensure Noed agaln for bis un-.| Brets "Ginca of tho Norh. Bitision Jigh School | atud that of the Entompment branch in 1876, 100 ma‘,‘qm'hfix: mmige fgnd::?fln?mqmwnz¥ ths'&o?e < MB. X. L. OTIS . s ’“mmficdeth“;}hfi&mo%“uon’ Yiis.| Manglter.] : | il to t Mr. Sullivan’s evidence i d D 2 3 . | = o s .| was going to investigate, should make up its & 7ér 8o dch * willingness to accept Mr. Sullivan’s evidence ihave been impressed with the uprightness and no- ) 'membership throughout the State oy look He, However, withdréw this, conclading to defer |- Je5ired to call Judze Lawrence's attontionto s pind ns” to what. ~It onghit not to appoit . Byansind sovde Sheh etk gracetol | the e P il sftuatod, § womia. sakt | Wiy ol soms conducs Ss Jator during ine. late | forward to recetving the Tournal before the st uiry until the next meeting. *. ‘ew Yorl:, which resulted in a number of the committec with unlimited andindefinitepowers, [*nesged during theSullivan . If he Kad'been | MT: Reed, toseeall that occurred fu that un- [ jtrial. -Havinz been pupils of Alr. Hanford dtiring;|’of December, 'heCnmmigfi{: on“Aud‘?xissi?zsvrepgrt;d fa- | Judges being removed from the bench. 'a::z“c which wouldHmit itself to its Juflsdic- on the .hcuufijhcac gl“ould ive been some fun- g},”gg;;“;fi’jnfig“;j‘;;fgfi“‘,‘;’;‘;?j' -‘;:3 '?xu ';‘:n;nggnfif:{fii‘;&flfl?’;flfieflgfigfi;?nt 5 doaa Sy —— . vorably in to William Law and James Judge Lawrence begged leave to suggest-that | 3 Lcrals, aughter.], 'The kissing; and applaud- | 3~ ¥ o ¢ " | 'derer.of our beloved teacher shonld not be, declac- & AND SHAWLS. Rai i s Chatl e i e s fhiente. or jusios: had the | plonations for ‘the guidanés of the Court |rcd™Ziiiters, e Mook aanying AL Flow nder the rules the report Went'| they had no proper means toinvestigate acase ). .. . o MR, MOHAN. T Hore 1 i over. S e P e et 2ail by Mr. Goady. | indorsed all that 8fr. Bwett had gaid ith'refer.:| i hed cantrolledhocourts to the dis. | 220 J4fy “as ©3Mr. Sullivan el g{w{ {Eril, whiehmay serye to remind you of our p- “Mr. Black, from the Committee on Amend- |'that proper information had pmmfily Tot been ||enée to Spllh ‘He "disscnted entirely ‘from |’ grace of the bar and the diégrace of the courts | o' 'ehni it n? ke t: lis evidenice and also to | recintion of an honest man. . ment of the Law, submitted the following: . 1'in the possession of the peoplé—tnat the report: thie rémarks of Mr. King, 'thit, in 'his belicf, no |'and of public justice. -~ m,al;"gt',‘m;mml’bmmer When the jury sent’ 3 };un{.snotnnst E::wn Crass or TiE NorTx: N s - “Tii¢ Committee on Amendumeat of the Law, o |'of the trial in the newspapers were inaccurate, | comnittee of would‘adree g to the Fal-' |~ The resolution was sddpted, ind the ‘Assocts- | (048 of ot Ve MENE Voo e Yot | o e Per Committee. | T which'was referred, on the 1st of April, 1876, the | He presumed that was so o a considerable jings 2rtopl to say | tion ‘adjourned. ! in bad toste for Reed to object to their taking it | A the Tett, elecunt gold yady . resolution introduced by Ar. Withrow, recommend- | tent. ., But he did not kuowhow the Association | ,the report of any cominitt & 1 ks 5, T oy ok tha e with 1t The vew ' ccompanying the letter was an eenndg‘ ing the ensctment in Illinois of alawrelatingto |'was going to sccure o report which would por-i|Worked impartially would be unanimous, us. YRER CBICAGO. |t anlesd they dookthe LI RIN k aity | g et with, Gameos, forming o neat and cle- the execating of contracts in writing, and the abo- tray ucc'firntely what did ocenr at the trial.:| 1€ss some lawyers got oh s ‘some "jurors [ PNy sl . W s cen. given iem, and it.cxactly |‘gant testimonial for the action which has been Ttion of all ids | HOW M'ALLISTER'S RULINGS INVITE IMMIGRA-. “suited Sullivan’s evidence, and an honest ‘juror | go generally applauded by the Chicago public. . distinctions betweéen sealed and un- to gc_t on in the Sullivan cuse, with their THE PETITION MANAGERS. o ¥ ! sbaledwritinge, beg leave to report hat, after con- | £ossibly there wore shorthand reports made o TION. |"was, bound to acquit i just five minutes. In 5 L : i p *made ap. o B e T 2 u -~ > sarryli [ 5 o i snngo iarof ‘aid Tecolation, theyare o |, erence 1 b TULER $RC RO LGRT | "o _zé?n]g—m aid got on. "(Lotghtér aaa | ;T by tnot i, Bit fallin | g to carrsing Hee afms 1 ugree ogoln with | e fow dontlomen who havo durge.of the sch Jaw; and {herefore recommend that said reso- |'reports.would e s matter of dispute between:| 9pplause. R it e 2, 1] 876.—Col. Fiagtor, | 12060 Gitizen shomid go_without ‘a pistol, as i | ‘retary Randolph's private officc, on the Board B e A e o dctondoat. Py | s, Moran—Yes, infortasatdly, ono aid gét;| Avmons, Ll Nov. 1, 186.—Col. A, Zeor, | 8000 S0RE LipHioh o thnoconce in case & min | of Tryde yesterday afternoon, and.there held a ) AV I Intion be not concurred in. The report was silopted. b, ‘had o compulsory process. Whatever they got'| O § y L e Phicago—H AR, FRIEND want to, cotne!| G led to . kil _hi forhbor | et k uggnxldm‘rng"bwoncz TAWYRR. ‘in. the way of formation they \v_cumy Ret: ett—Don’t let Us try the ciso oyer. :to Chicagoto live, dnd I wish you would aid ine, {f;, ';-;-‘l’fw":ns‘fif’f"gfi I:oon?u T ead ‘thedaw T 'fifl‘ig"g;‘e‘gf fif‘t‘}."’e’ 'f.fg‘t‘g,‘“ “’:Mmg?bffi 3r. Ullman offered the following: imerely Dby tbe e of people . toil, ~Mr. Goudy said it, had been suggested. t) in getting o ‘house. ‘I "have -been thinking of .“-. t out and boaght me ‘3 Remington, a Colt, .| ‘greatest public_importance, the secret scssion ‘knotr, ‘and te- | jand a Derriniger, all with the self-defensc at- | 'was, to say the least, in bad taste, nd showed o om Judge McAllister. It séemed to o 2 212 0 5] oo Rraent. & i Tiave tras ment. ... . 7 5 L \spirit of cowardice-on the part of those who had T A T T s |1 baver patience with the clamor raised by | the petition In charze askigg McAllister's restg- \be two guestions, be sugpnscd to examinc and | ‘i, if he made such a request, and the report ;" U wba ipass upon: Ope—Was Jud; o AlcAllister correct '| was favorable o' him, he would tlosq the benefit || ,me towards you stronger thaln ever, atid Thive |41 "Hanford trial ‘seainst Mr. Sullivan and his-| ‘nation, ,Amid smoke and talk but little was ac- 2,000 Ladies’ Beaver Cloaks, be- of it. If.it be true, as stated, that his conduct | 'fully determined ‘that ‘the ‘great, free “City of.|'aesociates. Tt comes from a'class of people for ‘complished, thouzh a good deal of time was | jng & bankrupt manufacturer’s W) . The § Court of this State, on | Whom . they . applied, ~ and ..when the:|'the investigation ought not to proceed without, | | jove Tor a'lobg thii e Resoriation. s siEicken. | report came in whatwould it be. Therowould | a nsest To this move for a'loBg tiric, s the name.of A. Goodrich {rom the roll of attorneys for advertising to_procure divorces without pub- e lees o o damo i | Il TS 22 8 e O e then pomag | Qeserved vediipation, and b shouid, des By 00 ~ | 'Was he honest in them' ow were they going | deserved investigation, and he ‘shot esire 6 £ ‘be ‘m om in 5 Th E . T irs HE o 3 . zntas batore bis divorcement, and thore is 1o law. | o decide whether he was. honest or ot liow | iipeachiment, it was s "B fuipona that, e | ‘oiiciko . sull, be. Ty Dame 1o the i whon] hnee Fespecy; bad men, thirsting for’|jepent in delboration, After seversl Poues maks | Stock. We shall offer them st o dis- ip e State fo prevent euch pdvercirements, - . | 'were'they going to decide that he was correet or | would mever make sich o xéquest, And, $horo™-t oo it sine, and It s Worn, b B T s o “how public opinion 18 divided. | ‘pablic eithor when the petition will be prescat-:| cotnt of 30 per cent below the usual oHe'SRheoR Lo co-omeRats with this ALsoelation in 1| MOt except by taking a vate of the membors on.| fore, it scomed to bim thet the, Resiilolih or- fi?&fim&fl;‘?flfiffim 1, Upon 12} Glicago . contains~ 2 _population _of 500" 23 or who will present It As the matterlooks, | ‘prices » it ining: juestions, some of which wo m] [ ganized as'it was Promm A LU it i Joii ») g2 e g e e oubiish sotices | doubts For himgclf he said, as be had said at Etton of lustice, ouEht to procéed cntirdly in- O e o an| et thousomptiacy wasatraldot Judge | = 360 T,5i05’ Beaver Cloaks at $3, mliziz nilygl haidv:hxz.izfixigu:n pm‘r‘:umxflxilwrcn. ‘= all times and all ‘;:;oper houms\olfs, when the (tlclfiltfdv:ncz £ofl:lse(.\.[i Jéisé’er’q)thvfis?éfi infi'egard‘.] i petitions for the Judge to resign. This leaves Y| et | 2,85, and 6. - , That Secretary furni copy of ¢ i is mi ed, Wi .koowl- . ¢ law B 7 . | ies’ % O e T per 077 ©f | aRestion e b 8 o e cdgos TERaR i Ve Sugested {hat. they 50000, ana the v not only FpresumesTbut) SEORET SOCIETIES. | qiaofe Sadios AL Vool Tesvar .Mr. Black moved as’an amendment, thst the’ t rulings that he made | had no means of getting atcurdte information—. “Those o are not against me_are for me.’ ! ‘&8 5057 9. gl i ed, at ggj&x&firy‘(:émmituée be instructed to ‘prepares 5 said that he believed | that there might be’a differcuce of opinlon be- "Having thus proved there are 450,000 Who sus- AMASONIC | '$8.50, 89, §10, and $12. 10'be presented to the Legislature ‘“pro- i ed honestly and consci-:| tween attoricys .as to_whether the short-hand nt and will :| 'tain Sallivan and human_ rights agaivst those’ RE e o e iabise ‘|. -500 Iadies’ All-Wool Beaver ~iding by’proper pexalties for the prokibition of | entiously. ‘belteve that any onewho | Teports were correct. He wis siarprised to licar o, Th it ase of this de- | 50,000 who conidenin O'Brien (n healchy work- GROBAE WASIIATON A5 4 BASON. ‘Closlks, oxtra long, clegantly trim. sdvertisements of that character.” 27| Enew MeAllister 2 he did would attributetohim | that. He had been told that there was ashorte| ‘oot St y e ™ e A {18 méjority we may remark), let us ook into Tashinglon. ‘Garonicle., med, at §12, §12, $16, §18, and $20. Mr. James L. High seid the - Committeé. on: B o i | Baad roport made of all the cvidehes and to. | CSi0n 18, that Tlidve justlearned ‘of thiolarge| i3 Gl of R g T proales | , A correspondent of the Chronicle makes the | “96h Taqigg® Finest Germenia Boa Gneyances had lmg fx;lequent m‘ismdegmzi 31 al oflice., Howeyer wide]; t;c g%fl%flefi fledsfims'gn& 3crcmarlksi&ndq nn‘ghe}isfltaififiz ‘ircedt;n:c‘ g\m:jn;f.ce% by h};oiir Bi’bcx;eflccr:.[t‘ ‘ljngwl “ywe shall find & stil grgmer ieparity in avor of ‘strange statement that George Wumm(;? was | Olomis Far pad SH tfimmad: paints coucerning the advertisements, and bad, 3 S ade jn the 47l of | questions which arose, for the purposes of 2 as interprete ¥ bis Honor 'Judge.| [personal liberty. In the first place wohave the | made s Mason in 1777 at Morristown, N. T, | g y Tédeived letters about them from different parts | ‘the case, he never co ‘made to belicve that | of ‘exceptions if the case.Wweat, to. the Supreme | McAllistér in'the récent vinlisppy allalr of Mr.- oot et Tradtot Chicago, ad In speaking ofits | while the sfmy wes fo camp there fa winter ,F:n ns;flszég%g.szé’-& sod §30, worth nfimgs ‘were intentionally wronr; and he | Court. 'If so, there would be no diftienlty in| gimienn. w0 Most Wise Judge! A very Dan- | members 1 cannot do ‘better than to repeat what Quarters. There is not one word of truth in the . et mn N emeating th oo | dan tiedlar mood that could come | getting at, the recoras, and at cach décision and Aliis S ihom s ¢ Th Tot cen sent £o es requesting them to co-* not séc any particular go 1at could come | getting at coras, and af [écision | % 2 2 & Judge Me, ter said of them: ey arc a lqf 2 3 aperate, 5o that ihvorces cuuld be procured 1 | from an {nvestization. The rulings might, be Bl Ianguage of the Judge. 1t had becn charged | ¢l cometo judgment.” It Judge MeAllister | of eg-dealers and grain-gamblers, uplearned in | Statemient, as the official Masonic records show, i taken up seriatim; part of . the. Assodation | that, althongh the rulmxi?i m‘gl}x“ Dbe. technically | had taken his present manly stand in favor of.| ‘tne 1aw and \m\von{y of respect.” Then there | and it isimproper that snch astatement should 0 pirt of the Unitea States. The Committee 0 r ¥ 1d ‘Several i‘xifiomln! w&sx‘x!m{éons, a}nIui had | ‘would I’%‘{r%' t,hhem and y;lnr: _?rongguce thcfi gorte 2 Ttlhc_ gx':-‘::mexil mwut:h tt ‘f ?Iscltslilonsc “‘;:(ré:_ human tights -years ago, in place of hunting’|apa mtw gp—goo?s ng;id other ;}lcrchr;ts. zinzd o uncontradicted. The records of Fredericks- repared a on the subject. He pre- | wrong. én they 'got that far, they woul m: atmosphere created in .the, co men down Yke wild ‘animals, to-day 'Chicago| some of them only retailers; . few real-estate Lodge, No. 4, of Frederlcksburg, Va., now | Y merer, dhat the bl should_ b pre- | Bave made no ‘proavess. . It was, ‘conceded by | room—was suchias o 'produce"a given Fesult. | i yave contained a population 3 5500400 | ownére, many of them heavily. mortgaged; }’:’f D o, of rsssrvatlon, show that | 10 cases ‘of Broohs and All-Wool Jired by the Judiciary Committee, as tnit as | Mr. High, and by others who had “spoken, that | WWas there any @ifficulty about “a _commit- | R O gelf evident.| 167 lumbeéraien and commission-merchants, no i E"W i Inttiated Nov. 4, 172, Flaid Shawls, from auction, at very tkggm‘;eeremmimawconsmetthpsub]ect this wowld be a step towards the excuipation of:| tee investigating: such facts?. He -had | instead of SOBOW. 1.Ce e it is a sell-evident®| 34000 than the last-mentioned; a few doetors, George Washington was ov. %, 1035 | Jow prices. *Mr. Goudy remarked that the resolution was | Judge McAllister if the Association - finally con-;{ no doubt . .that_ the jurisdiction — of | proposition that the best Government, is that many of them without. a patient; a_few assed the degree of Fellow-Craft March 83,1753, 500 Single Broche Shawls at $8, stmply one of request, and it seemed to him the | cluded thiat there Was no cause to censure him, | the Bar would be, submitted to. . They.| iwhich allows the greatest freedom toits people, || bankers and money-shavers; o few preachers, | and ralsed to the s ublisie degree of Master Ma-'| ‘58, nnd ST0. i could cxamine the cousel on both sides, and nu-,} 4ng ‘intimately connécted fith this ‘prin-’| Bome “of. them 0o, better than they ought son, Aug. 4, 1753. He remained 3 member of 5’00 Double Broche Shawls fine sxieriient was ot germane. ngdq ht u:‘l:e o]rwfi{fnwis impoachment if it houlflbct!ogn oo the fouecl on both fice and bne me o then e it vobéd on'scparately. He hoped it would not'be .| that«liere was cause. Were they going to m- ) merous pen who court, Spl fould be itated s _ twin | to e: and last a very few mewspaper men wi Frederlcksburg Lodge, No. 4, in £ood standing, | . Judge because he differed from ther in | trial, and got at the facts outside of the reyort- ciple. shou stated . | no character fortruth and veracity—in all 50,000. urg , No. 4, In g ing, | quality, at $13, $14, 516, $20, and P e e moulT e né g s atated by Julgs Lay- | postulste that cvery ‘man hust,’| TRed formotten toadd to e oy [ untll Feb. 3, 118, when Alexandria | §25, worth from 816 10 $35. “Mr. Blak withdrew the amendment. 15 view of the law? It would be neither an ex- t ! man _ musk 3, X M, Moses said the resolution as rexd did not | culpation nor a step toward impeachment to say.| rence dnd Mr. King (e was sorry to hear any | in‘the nature of the case, be the juilge of what: %‘:rrr, the Bigot, and Revengeful . Reed, the | Lodge, No. 22, waschartered, when be significd 1,000 . All-Wool Scotch Flaid incinde the other members of the Bar who ad- | that'they disagreed as to somic of hils rulings in expressiops of opinion on the merits of the case) | is his freejom. . The trouble has heen herctofore ;| Wreteh, making a'grand total of 50,002. his desire to joinit, being situated near to his | Shawls at $5, $6, and $8. vefixsed the same a5 Goodrich. |, the ease. If the invefstiz:tioh wgs to 5nde:\n_ ?“y' that they were :;_}t;hccofil:xgg ,I‘,b,;t to |]Lntow 'k:illjlm klihq_i‘rineixhomfoé m&;l;& mgmhg{hgt !a(?&%he l?crn:hsh}? n;zte h:fvcc’hfi ‘;et‘tfv:rfillmnv'. residence, and he was E1ecw:11 a member of %flg 300 AIl-Wool Beaver Shawls at . Ullman % " hing, if 8 majority of the members did not a E i ) . .. | society shall'end ani e freedom -of another | 45 ;.but. the 8 of etter will nof he gh YR . Hi: oy e E o n aded sand.others, v, {2 walorliy t r rulings or all, for all he (Goudy) | member of socicty shall begin. .In.other words, Qllow o full_analysis of them, but in general L%?{fi‘ :;::o:gz io?;’s ‘g;mh::hlfi thcsz 5?. $7, and $8.50, worth $7, $8,and And the resolutio imosly adopted. | prove of his rulings, they would 'have to take in'some.of his ¢ m::;: :’n_fL‘;,‘:smfin T snonxcr step nndgf]’ucslion his motive. They | knew. Mr. King saia he_got his. information |} there have been constant misunderstandings -| tefms I will say they represent the chivalry, | Jodges, ‘s well as the oflicial records, places | Figoo o P - Mr. High presented the following, 86 fioved | would have to ey Fhotter thete’ was cvidenig | from the newspapers. Judge Lawrence did not | and, consequently, conflicts and, hitigations to | and dash, and spirit of frcedom of the Western | this'question entirely beyond dispute, and it is 300 Bingle Shawls at $2, $2.50, sts adoption ! or fasts within_ their )im?‘vlcdézc whih Would | soy whero b gol hl:mfl‘;—mog‘:flgpgg bie gzt tils question between miémbers Of so- | hemisphere. We !must. also u{ibd to this numbor | very singular that any Mason gt the proscut day and $3. TEuEAe, Seri e e o ia 4| justify the Association in imputing toJudeeMe- | mind as to . certal S| - | ciety. . ) o B ... .| seventeen men “Jearned. in the law’ an e | should. undertake to make statementsto the 1o oahe, Serioin cxiigsatinns et Topdaldc T e Ao e adminlaiiaton b by - formation obtaied from the newspapers, but | ° But happily this tss a1l pisséd sway so far s | cleven Jurbes who knew what the lnv was vien | contrary. its sisaymeons corceepondont will ; theconduct of me{lun. W. K. nux{ Er, one of | dutics. . He did not bq(llicvcsudx evidénce would | he made fuvestigation far cuoigh to “find “out g‘,‘hmo i3 concerned, for there 1ot a, boot-'| the Court told them. Then comes Mellister, | find that George Washington was not only o k , ple vs. Alexander Sullivan uponan indictment for thiat should be produced tosay thatJudge | vinced that cufate information was desirable. | maintdin them without fear "of ¥aws, which | the Stoic, with his great family paper, neutralin | ticipated in virious Masonic celebrati f St. 4 Egeder; Gerefore, indietment for | Honce that should, b pratueed oy ruled | Ho thonght if Mr. King eaw the ofiiat yeport, | heretofore have been worse than tho Bpuaish | poliics, ‘but devatol o rolidion and reformm,. | Jotioe Doy 480 meny. othér public cecasions. 9 e m“’{,' Sommittee of mitie ;meinbéra 6.1 onuly and perverted the administration of | perhaps e would see /it Wasiistaken, The ob- | Inquisition. Judge McAllister hus scttled these | making a grand total.of 450,033 in favor of unf” | The chartér of Alexandria Lodge, No. 22, now fonApocistion he :!‘P?!fl.‘fld. \\'!1%?: duty it sh‘n" justice. He thousht the only, resnlt of the fn- | ject of the Inquiry.was not to reach . given re- | principles fully and clearly, ind, I trust, for all | versal freedom_and the heaven-born right, of | hanging in the lodge room in the City of Alex- izate;tne ¢atire procec n it bt £0 ot seeurate information, and tolay | time. Gen. Dix snid in 1881, Whoover writes | self-defcnse, Shall 50,000 racn, including.the-| andFia, as well as the records of the Grand 114 & 116 State-st. taken in th & ! & i 3 AtR. DLACE Ko capable of verification before the Association, | but Dix was then considered a fiéry, hot-headed | lcarned in'the law.”” and, all told, but onc-tenth | jnot, wos named 8s Aaster of said = f Fi Ao . G, Moo oo e adoption, <ald the case, vas stlll on the eriiifal docket | leaving it, when it ncted, fo take such actionas | youngster, and was covered With cpnuletics, | of the population, dictate to 450,000, or nine- | Jodge, tand this was the nct of Ed- D‘N' B. mi?hhauup%ZgOCR of Fine Mr..Gopdy aid hat it ocourred to him, if | fortrial. It was probable that it would be'| the circimstances might demand. He took ‘it | and not with the ermine, and little attention | tenths of the p_caglc_of Chi what they shall | ;usd Randolph, then Governor of Vir- ( D38H0N r that actlog Y en . e o toe ‘shonld | tried by Judge MeAllister. -They could not an-'| for rrauted that the Assoclation would mever | ywas paid toit, But it.was'left ta.Judge Me-:| thitik? God.and MeAllister forbid.._ When that | pinia and Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of = g g A <t af the case | undertake to say Whether o Judge had declded | Allister.to give emphasis to this noble declara- | day comes let Mercyhide ber face. -But Ieannot Boeand Accépted Masons of that Common- ZUR GS. hié Judges 6f the Circuit Court of Codk Cotinty, in' | ever be found, nor. he belicve that ama- | thet-he wos mistaken in.the conclusion at which ack or newsboy, in your lrcu"c{ly tolsy but | the Mereifal, and Sullivan, the Suffering. Saint, | Mason twenty-four ycars before he was ever in ings perf Dg stiratit 1 4 v to ke live'the | 8 tothe'kald trinl, and report fo this Assotiationat!| Yestigation would be simply to kecp alive D o o whichs would b seliable and 3 un- | Tiodgo'of Virginia, shows that George Wash- fairly represent - the various clements of the | ticipate the nilings of the condu ; 1 y. nd to b i ' i T A LNTT N 3 p ) ter had made mis- | & debatable guestion of law rightly or wrongly. | tion, and to make o practical application of this-| close without a word of. encouragement to the Y 1 has by de to a I of - N - ,‘_“{‘,’ 3 and'if a report was made it should be one | in another trial, %sf McAllister If they did, léhc:y would sit there morning, nuollla tmn’ le. But for ,léhis. 5 wmfl% not bécome s | Chicago. Zimes. With, its characteristic candor ;::lh(gnl i‘fimfi&'if&cy‘f’m"i—i%é“a‘h; to ;u:f:wurunn L J !! CKSO? cannection with the trial of the case of the Peo- | Jority of the members would vote upon any evi- was why e, became con- | undérstands, fuily,. his _rights, .and ..can | and Bully Billy O'Bricn, the Bruiser,and Storey, | Morristown, N. J., {in the year 1777), but par- itanext mecting what, action, if any, should bo | fll-feeling that hugl arisen out of th trial an anonymous letter, shoot ' him on the spot;” ) Board of Trade, and others no better, all structions, as was claimed 2 0} v 2 £ 4T 3 s fostractions of Chicdgo; but, for this, Judge | and consistency, it has been with the upper dog | written by Washineton to one G. W. Snvder nud & would ‘command _entire confidence and.| takes of law in'hi { L y g ome, 1 w and the trial the mis- | and night. ~There. was . mo .ease, he | residént _Chi ‘;fim"&ifl%finmflflflw Wit the, sumbier e lgnigm:igfié‘?etx:: et i "dnd bo | presumed, in which a Judge &id not decdes | McAllister fnight ~ bave ,died fn obscurity; | in the Sght.ffom the first, and with ite usmal | copied into ““Sparks Life of Washingion.”: The Mr. High accepted the suggektion e oi v seomod to him, thérefore, an in- | point o points on which o great. many laeyers | but for this, personil Tihsrty, wielit have, re- | proseience it bold ‘the-pudlic how the Jury stood | Statement mado in this letter being entirely de- Y e ot b O e nyesti- | Yestigation would . be, fll-timed, and, +*closcly | \vould not difes (o B, ‘What thoy had (0 | maited ' By-word in .Chitago, and the.city | bofore it stoodat all, .o Void of truth, that He had not been in o Masonic gutibu woiild be, postponet cq"mtfi il pe’| approximating fmpertitence.” The ‘resilty Ihvestigate and find out was, whether the Judge' | jiself ke continued a suburb .of St. Louis..| ~Asto Berryit pickedhim béforehe was ripe, | Todge ‘“more than once of.twice In thirt Eutlold be postponed mutl hoitidl was | spprsmating [RRCCLASt Sy, oy Sotites, | was seimallyJustited or it Had thoro ben | Dut Judse MeAlister bns not only, set Lorth | hnd teasiog onen e breast it exposed his bIAc | Loassr and paraoriing £6-be. wwittcn fn 17, A Ykt % fnterteréne “," ) C8 _lnn,tPfl. n,w_jogd would Ticcessarfly prejudice the case of the de- | inal-administration of his office or not? Was | the cnormgtg‘ of writiog anonymous lctters and.-| heart, to its million of Christisn readers. Iti| o {tas a forgery. Washington conld not . I uaf tortoréncel The ailestions dnvolved | Fendant, if the conclusions of the Association | he guilty of abnee of his powers from tho way | aflxed the death peolty thcreto, but. he s | even told the public bungry for news and grate- | fella ey as the hateet story sliows, und this i that it I'(')\l? Appe: o im = im ntc)i 2: were made public before the trial. Afterit e decided questions of law! They might be:sp | deterniined very properly who may inflict ‘that | ful for crumbs, how Reed and 'Berry were en- | you]d have been one, as the recards of Alexan- v et it would sppear mproper, for the s | were mede, DOl SOyl Fotment of | palpably wrone a5 fo show ho_biss of the | poulty, Bt offar rcatermporiance b (0 | B e Tivery business together, The only | drfa Lodgs show. & he presided over-that : kot W qs‘efi = "mdss ulmih h’:, mfis r;mhncnmmmcm udse—that he intended to'produce a_givenre- | world is it that Judge McAllister has given us a hing it Jacked ‘was a trial balance showing the | Lodge as its Master it is Dot _poasible that. he = Dioptc e thiy qught th be luvest] e ) S b saw notlilng In the objection of Mr. | sult.in the case conurary to_ public justice., If | Jaw on self-defense. This law may be neiw. to | profits of their business. : . made sny such statement. His octive interest | mye fargest exclusive FUR HOUSE in the Weat, Bar o B I el Whe | Biack. The record wis all made up and had | the Jaéstion wisdebatable,--capable of an opin- | some, and at first moy seem o little awkwatd, | ~ But in oric thing that paper his not shown Ifs | ju_Masonry is shown, by the records of this eat, “Tuter er would o £ be his | fon on either side, and wh ek plal ut, it Wi ¢ tifying to the.Judze ) usual enterprisc; it has not abusc s, Han- e, a s public acts, like the laving of offer ou and after Monday, Nov. was not. guided by prefudies or by the | Bla p i Jther side, and with conflict 6f authori- | b il be gratifyl the .. Jud ul enterprise: t bas not abused, Mrs. Han- | odge, and s publi acts, Jaglng of | sud will offer ou and atter Monday, Tov. 6, EAS JUST Tg) torest in thic inatter would out. | gone to the coubitry. Whatever iz ; e uld find the Judgo guilty of || to ki lc -of self- X joh'I eouelide Brother Mood, > R 4 > i e ‘mext tridl | ties,—thoy would never dnd the Jucso of | o now that. it is the samé principle of self- | ford much, by which'T conelude Brother Muody | the corner-stone of the United States Capital, i ]tf‘n ;fim t{l“fl, Ind the Afi”{?{‘ ten cou}}fl '%“’3'5‘%2350“53&’; ?Eut:h:clt‘i?r’; lgfflzm ‘Associa- | corrupt action or dishonesty in the W-DX’I%} »gfl'q if defense ns that long held by me, but, with the | has got ‘liis grip ‘on the chief of sinners him-.| Sept. 18, 1793, and in many public Mnmnlcpccle- 1 1 \| oo ke Ip ihe cfihnrcflm g dt%a&’,, @lifl! 1 gm‘:-m Ot had already oceurred. ~ There was | for all heknew, it might be that there was & ignorant prejudico in the country. where Ilive | gell.; . .. - - : | brations, He was buried with - Masonic honors, m‘a;e"ih“c \*tbe resplution ba Inid on o table | somo force, however, in the objection that the FALFADLE VIOLATION OF LAW, . against killing, it ‘has availed mé nothing, and | passing word now to the Judze. Donot | and the funeral ceremonies were the most im- 10r thie prek R e | B mittee withlold its report, o the Associa- | and such 4s _would convince any | whenT liave found it nocessary Y had ever- taken place in America at b Seakins ( Ssclene 63 the inction, | tion withhold final action, usitil aftcr the By, and, tne Commitee “Shavmimouly | boslous peons by death 1 have boen om- | Yon ove o the Bench and o he Sae_screr | fat G, bec 16,000 P o s e et 51 aoiors | Yrial, He could sce but one, tenable objection | that ‘the Jdge Bad violated the law intentiou- | pelled to ‘usc Insanity and sométime scen mewmbiers of it—and to 430.033advisers to | ey CuAPTER 1N CHICAGD. ., | forthereastn that it scemed o him if any ac | trtl, K cauld ¢ Dit 958, SMaclion ot the | aly. - On tho contrary, the Commitce might | But [ do not bestato oy 1o decareycins i1 s A Where ToRIesd On domot hrough | Tassddy evcotos Jast Arthiur K. Atkius, 3.'E, Lo a5 to be cnflw the sul iafL' ‘should be sent time, and that was that the Juiliciary ;| be able to reach 8 conviusion that there was o | ing'the humane use which Judge McAllister has | any false delicacy consent to let another Judfc G. H. P.of the State of Lliinofs, constituted en after. full and fair. consideration, snd at | present Ums, BAC, OO, 6y oo ot their proy- | Toom to suspect the ‘motives of the Judge. He | been able to make of his new invention in sav- | cry Banford again. You ‘arc familiar with | Lincoln Park Chapter, No. 137, R. A. M., inne- ameaping illed for the parpoee: bl i agreed with Mr. King that, in & commttee of r Sullivan from the bloodhounds, that his | tlic. case, and with the parties, and, what {s of | ordance with the usages of the Order, and in- ‘At Mannfactarers' Prices. o b P 2 i took it b i i Ar."Goudy sugeested that the motion be mod-| ince to investigate thelr °°“d“°"m[131€grcc ot | thirteen, thore would be & difference of opinon | lay is far ahead of cither of fhie above methods, | more importauce o the people, soux mindfs | stalled the following officers: o {504 to postpone; that would not stop de- | 1t that could not be rged with any degree of | LR\ (0 letions of laws but if there was | andwill be approved by every man fmbued with | made up, and there is no chance or the Board | “yrigh Prieat—Lnther A. Becbe. to remove ob-. | yield to., this détand of the rabble: to resign. ;| posis success. The judges were 2 part difference of opinion as to whether M- | the epirit of frecdom, and that within twelve | of Trade to gamble on the resule. Sit atill. T e Simmann. te. . 2 o sk Their disgrace. the Bar's | & r. Rosenthal acceded to the modification. belonged to it. eir s o ‘Allister was honest or not, he took it that the | months it will be in general use in all our large | Now a word on business. . Get me a first-rate sa—;‘f—s EG' .‘3’“{5'"1'; i C. 8. G. Fnliet. and thesp "tifin oo i Mm. GOUDY disgrace; thelr reputation was the Ban's republ | SCEC B8 0t %o b6 made. He did not | citfes. 1 dwell upon this with rauch feeling, 25 | house in Bridzeport, or where I can do the most| C. 5aid ‘he was oppo:cd th postponerhent. The | tions and as o matter of el defense they ouglt | Iy ee L Ot o b e | e e ePosiion on the part of some | good. T slall want to move fn on Taesday. I | 7 whole commusity had been sgitated on the AT it othiots, since this Lue ‘and cry liad béen | non-professional men “ unlearncd ‘i the law? | shall vote here. before I leave, for Tilden and.| - % 4, ook 5. a5 question, and it was discussed dgily in the neivs-: MR SVETE o Gr.| raised, fokhow whether there was & Julge on | to question the sounduess of Judge Medllster's | Hendricks and Reform, sad for Gor, Stegart | A1 ] Tiird Vo3 W Redner, papers. “The,second vriat of Sullivan was heing o take aby part in adfoctlig or | %00 who was guilty of such abuse of his | views.” I would remind such persons that | and hard and soft inoney and. Reforay, and RG34 oF Firsk ot Teo.cdner. allceted {ivthat mapyer, and he did not sce why ing an investigation, because e, WS- RO | powers that ‘he would attempt, to havo | Judee McAllister was unanimously stistained | 1 wlll e with youat 11508, and T will do| 2 of Fireh V'o-gobm Yee. 1hs BOShoAld beany more dolicatc up the shb-: it fheciac, and for ot | B guiliy man " acquited ‘and . diselisieed, | ih this part of his defensg D associatesin | what . 1. .dan “hoost’ Bully. Billy | Srorearth- & St ject, than anybody else. Charpes- had . been L °d It Tiad been said, that [ or ~convict -.an inngeent | I He “did | the trial. Iwill make a singie application '0f | Bruiser O'Bricn’s .“byes” and :Reform. Tyler—Tienry Spatholt. made oo which the Judge had :been abitsed; 8 | the e O vestitation on accouiit of | DOt fedr, aby difference of opinion onall the | the principles 'involved fn Judge SlcAllister's | 'can . do. no, good here bui o vote once. . g T T petition, said 16 be signed by 5,000 0r 5,000 dti- | there ought t0be e~ aked no favorsin that | ital questions which the Associatioh had a | ney, rachine, . 'and .I. trust it will appedr | The black Republicans and niggers and -tem- ‘ODD-FELLOWSHIP. s Zes, hd béeid Rotten up, assing him to resiem, | the defendant, Sulivnn stih A% NECn S | right to fnvestigate and which it oughtto tne"| o Thic tp all that we shall, hear no more clamor | porance shriekers are so thick herc that, a0 hon- . clieap. e thpuyht, justified the | regard; the Assotiation The | vestigate. st its anthors. We will suppose, to make | est reform Democrat has_no influence beyond a ITENS OF INTEREST. Sying some. attention ¢o the | thought proper. . In s, (SEtts) Qpigion Big o Gaid there were Hiree views 10 | (- plaim, ihat my wifs and L siéa 3 ESHDOES | single vote—s were skeleton, o8 It were, of | Thelaét Lodge charfered ip Fennsylvailals.| matier. ery fmportant that correct i | aflical m“““‘@?%'é?fi;mfi;&flgah&cmy ey “on the sabject: onc was that tufiiers, and ihay nolghbornrites anavonymous | what ay able-bodied man should be able ta do | numbered 944, it T a O ormatign ghould bé obtained in, vera o | bad been greatiy mistcprasenteds 108 7 S0EY | 10, eika” focorrectly; suother that e | lottor decaring the fats. * The Ia¥ pressmes | io the gridt fréo civvof Chicago. Batwe sl | "ot e % conductof the trial. He was safisied that cor. | generaily misunderstoql {0 e\ dono, | committed some blundors; arid another that he | bt Jeter to be libolous. %, TUgHt 500 conless. | sco whcn vet there. Again I saymakeready | Honoldln, Sandwich Talaods, bos a new Lodge | - ' S omnatioyat o oy nspossesonor | Sfircns afoplion st SO TG WKL | ol Tl oot el were, pedicted o | 1 5 pctalllo et neNr ML | [y Gl 1 R AT R L o W, Sakes astalled FESTHERY C or 0 > B e it was being di nd nothing whi the source from Which the inform s JOF , ‘of : Y i T . - Grand Sire John W. Stokes the new s %lfir::‘l:cl';u “}ln‘;d“:'u:sfl‘drlmlfiflggi z?:?i&“wg:: e ;Q&E‘Zfifizfiffiffi‘é’n‘x‘q revent, Q’{s beinz | been obtained. _Lnnm“glé“lem} "fi;““i:‘?fii gfi‘?ffir l?:t‘ _cr{i;n‘g{l\\‘;oi Lbf ;f;z%g&c&’nrg .fi:\sl_illllramembeflng @nforygsfi%Am%‘De officers of the Grand Lodge of Delaware, 0 0 h e d F F P p 5 ; i iscussion being | did not know the facts. en a Judge o 3 L. ‘pistol % 'E.Juxl ! 3 7 B R & : = rrwd: B smc a]l aflCy eafiwm’ and make & report upon them. , Justead of pre- | discussed, Of course, the i . tuption, ‘the fousids- | ularly if i d-hand pistol and LG SENT ‘called ‘th i 4 i E 0 werc _not las benéh was assailed for corritption, ‘the foul arly if it is’a sccon _pis L1C SENTTMENT, 1 called th 1 judling dither the prescerition or the defetee, | By, by persons Miola ana sidica. | tions of sbclety were trucls xtmore decply than| ‘been séd by me on similar s occasions. s ey af The Trivime, : Of cvery description at MME. PONCELETS, should the case be Lried bgalp, it might have. s 8 JFresh Sont Yol they_woud be by a c} en st the | This tast provisidn is wisely dntended todis- | - ™ S0 T Qi 4 e ‘iivel | Grand Represenfitive E, B. Shetiman, of ihls . French Lmporter, 869 fWabash-av. , betwden Eight' very opposile effect sud prodice a faie andn- | lous,, M8 £0%0a i ‘s ‘a Totter e | Presint of the Gniteq Siaes, Ho'thousht |, oumeethe weof HE¥, and untried weapins | | Cmicaco, ‘Nov, & WLl o itirde ) Fosth(Biees B, B Ebililar, eenth and Twentieth-uts, Flowers for Pariies ane .+ mmf,‘ag“;‘:mfim';fi”uflfi e P osltions of Judge McAllster, | tho'truth ought 10'be brovght o ity on' AGHDor for | subseipton troth the Tiies o ik Tutdais'| clty, s @ candidate’on'the Bepubiicn ticket for | Weddings a peclaliy. :