Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, May 6, 1875, Page 3

THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: THURSDAY, MAY 6, 1875. 3 will hoas 1 do not proposa in this cass Lo | copting as to a xinglo atterpt to carry Inta el impropriety of Lha notlce had been brought up. e | defendsnta state that they have ne knowladze, infor- ( joinad the jolly crowd who are awailing an e TH E INJUNGTION. atemnpt mnlargfl righta which partien them- | ool an ordinauce continulug thedifferant Bosrds | I TU3% 1 Rs% noL Sh SO oY e | e ot mracr ol g Ao s | ause for goiug over to the Connty Tal. It le "‘)’;'i‘,":c‘:lm"“!- d"";‘.;;::,'“‘:fl ey ate iariies | of tha cily a they origlually wara. Of coursa | tion, and s there beén 1o no lction leld n Chicago laat Noveuber, uor 18 o b :‘l'l‘:"r;’[}’m"db:ll;‘"s:gr‘"';:r':m'l’!:gh“:‘;':n't"‘r::;: tompt, Of conrss, I am vory happy to hear | 10 Aldermen ware rostzuined from any now act | Eivan by the dayur it abil e o e T osan it 10 b8 cat st s munies | 1 this lant would be vory unkind, and perhaps | Proceedings in Bankruptey---The THE COURTS. af the peapls to ook s i C . from my brothron, and to bo advised fo this | of legiwlation under this law—from doiUk | (ionalact wanthat of the Council. The fallureof a | ipalelection of ha 33d ull. in any of the wards of the | unwarrantabls, were it not for the fact that a Motion to Strike Out the Sup- 113?;:, :?nl nn:ll ;1.:’ ;mt‘llllnn ‘l_? t;ullhofl"dnh- 2 anything to recoguize the act of 1872 | minis f-t;'l'nh.ifré'mnlxln ?‘:n';‘e?nm 'no::?n::v."u.: iy, aud 1,211“;-‘?».-; thn ‘nughirl?t vntl».nlmn{"y e nrity of u?‘,?-",,,,,?- :hh for nothing better Great Western, v " # enntotid n the part of the city, as ) t validity of on alsction., 1 volers in this rass sa: the Kirst, Second, Beventh, and Eleventh . plemental Bill Over- T e At thin Goutt. s no jurisdiotton | Lho otlgloal biil ought o declare L | G0t Pl Cltzant of whak was fo the act, e WLt aeaeed ONLIEN Parh. | ey fo/tban t0-anand & faw lours beliud ihe 1 A Lo A Lan in alleviation of thelr no-called contumpt of riled, e Caua it It Il Sxirh et | it AN old The uppismentsl it umply sked | ettt il eniilmentary o S 1 o sumiee comied sl 1eturnel by il uies ] » mp The Judgment Record, 1 80, tt can bo vory roadily aiown by anthoriticm, | enjoined- foom in- sy imanaer doinn angining wader | ooy e 0 T o b ey ) "ot petvsmed Ly ihe o8 Eallinal s L eriian hatolakancne ue aution ! miu, y i warae X y thio | Of CAlling & mesting for thin ovening, snd placing nnd_witlionit & Yary GTest AMOWNE Of ArumEnt: | (ha ek oF 167 whlch migh. mot bo dumwander the old | Jun il o represeltan, O e, LISl | Yhaues of Fivettun et Thoss wandb: oy dony ting 5 5 = he law, aod nat | Jud, of Election of thoss wards{ they deny that | It On record as an wijonrned mesting of tiie nes- " 1 t.lmurflalirm;:‘mltfi ln{: 'ihl' clllfi Inkul}ho MW;A "l':'-',[::;;:‘l;-‘v:um b::;lhl:fil?-’il'l’/rt the ‘.hh)i:r“dnl-llu,&ulxl‘nmtld the l|u'|':ll"}h 'r|:.. ufiy: l;ll\'nhk#uw.llul ge rbu:l"‘r or nort’ lny m" uufl. nion lnf lant Monday evening, nonn:*lnmtll this CHICAGO, conrno W dicated yestorday. 'Thie motion ERNMEN OULD I LLFT, npeaker cluse th referring to the Yoth Wisconsin, Fitth, Bizth, Tenth, Twalfth, Thirtesnth, Hevonleonth, | avening's inn ™R & By Consent (e Lawyers for De-|imuy bo onterod and o pnity who entora | AndA powers might be exercired tiler the new act | 245, and 221 Wieeonin, 510, rupartaf the Yenttinn | and Sinetech(l Wa (s tho nirober of Yolos whlch Were | faat u‘:md‘.""f"."&m".fi‘;‘.&??:‘iflé‘:‘!’.’fle‘?x‘n-'f 4 o Ly IAsTANOK COMELUE: tho motion may appear for tho city; nnd whon | Jhich could Lava been exeruised under tha old one. | ihats fatlure to publish notices of alection Wid not fu- | cast ction of last November ex- | proonmidared. This b ident] Clark W. Upton, Assignos of the Great Wast- fendants Aro Allowed to thie aentictmen’ ahe cotan oiy bohalt of . (e ¢it] ‘The adminfatration of city afTsirs would not be in validate It, short of the number of voln i ol precantion was evidently | ory Tnanrance Company, filed his regular monthe gontiamen wiio 1 ol of A0 SIY | fored with in aby shwpe o manuer. T then mads tns 30, STORNY nof Ayl st Tha detendsnts ad- | (8Ken Incane ol any tronble occasioned by the | ) oo Sy Y H Speaks arguo the matter they can stnie all their objec. }mlnl that the city hiad Lad @elegated to It by tha 2314 tha matter wan sll reduced tn the conslderation of e of ¢Inctinn wers anpolnted by tho | contempt of court in declanior tha election. | 1y rep! ¢, showing that the Company had tions to the nnr‘vlplemnnul bill, and slso to the | Iatures minlsterial power tocanvans the vot Whotlier 11:n 21iegaticns of the origiial bill wers sugls | Common Gauncil, bt leave ts complaiuants tn prove | Slhiould the legal quadrilatay o , thorefore, doduca | On hatd April 1, original bill 1 thatis, 8o far as thoy choose to | tiat power could have Leen delogated 1o the Uounity | clent to warraut the injunction, The bill alleged | What authority the Judges bad in rejand o tha apyoint. from to-day's procoedings (n court a coneluson | Hecaipts silce, wtato thom, I tiave intimated already tu coun. | Clerk or auy other indiyidual with s much pro- | feandulent votiny, jlisgal conduct on the part of the | ment of cieris or vinerwise. They sdmit that noex- | that Judga Williams intended Ao prosecuts for g sol that I cantiot occuny moro than a day to the | riety as ta the Common Councll. In aupport | {ydges, and cortaln other frregulsritics, Lut did not | [ress appropriation was nade by'the Cauncil tayay | gontomps, threc-line opinion to the Council 814 They Spend Four Hours In | anc.: ™ sm willing to riva thecounsol for | o, (5% ke read aavarst uectecne i whidh | foek i punieh in offenders, of o havd thn clstion | fof (6 fervices of e clrks of ection for the rean | woud wart. tho Aldermon, and all action af e e Elaborate Arguments. tho complainante thrao additional hours, aud the | fiut o fist i 4 e o o e tonasnts ot tr ag | Petient 10 tha nannaygy nf the aooualapprapristion bii | 184t saccting cauld be rencaled In a fow scconds, ey counsel for te dofeudants four bours and & balf, | “Haclalmed, further, that ‘tho eloction was null snd | whit the Luw forbade jhelr dolng, but It sougbt to re- | Of the city, but svur that the apprupriation could be | thoreby purcing the Council of contempt. ~That ANNOUNCEMENTS, ; ifthoy denir it Yol for tud rewon’that tha requirementu ol ibo | siruin be Gimmon Coupcl friia dolng someluing | lngally mafs after Ui electiun, for the pirposn of pay- | tho abova couree aill bo wilopted lwnot Yet | 11y ol amit of Wiliam T, iutl Wilb Juiige Dickor—T anggest that it s tho regalar | Matute liad nct heens compiled’ with i suv reapect 10 | which Gie faw orilercd them o do,—the canwasing of | 10 e exicases thereof, sud limt the expensas | cartaiutyy the aciion of to-day will decide ft, If «2JULIOF YA, K d Submit A Donyin mode, in & quossiou of this kind, firut ';at}m"_'"'(;:,flnx;m;;-fi;: lrr.:m{: et o Wroasly aule | the voles and tha sonounclog the result, Tho reliot 'r.num zm}' Vo ‘ICE:HY‘ x-:m out of the cou- | the Law Department sey *do ft.” the deed il : F. Btorey i sot for to-day bsfora Judge Itogors. And Submit an Answer ying 70 KiiOW WUAT WE SIALL DISOOSS, Jiane byt Canmatl, i ponething. Nab s farce, | rayelfor was (he puspension ln midalr of anelect | UMY N80 KL e iation prios to nach e, | frtbwith Ls dono, Juidge Dickey i socopted . This 1n » anit wherein Dutler clalms $50,000 All tho Other Sido 1f tho Court rulon aa £ think [t st rle, that | irug Alaiemen bt abioiutod them, £ad uader i | i y dho leaviog 1t perpetially unduermined: S50 | Hone Fha’ defcndante; with tha exceptinn of doseu | AULONLY in the strougholds of the Aldermen, | damages for belug callod & *ahystar,” Assorted tho “supplomonial blll” shall” Yo siriken | generalortucple ot fac” por sl forl pee vy | ek whothel oo Govama: GonEI had i Tt i | K., Foreoay ava o huowicde, loformtion,or b | g0 orything fhat bo o sulie esety, AL sgerted, ; 3 Canvam ths raturns, and, having canvasned them, ta | Nef anto whlethor the said Eorrest srstrucled the | dermanic congratulations wors showered upon UNITRD RTATES COURTS, had Leen | lum at the clone of vesterday's pracecdings, and | 11 United States bogan a euit In dobt agains discussion to tho original bill, and [ snd it was evident that, at the Umo thoy appointed to tho jurisdiction of the mattor prescuted In it, | thess men who so grorsly conducted thmelvos, they | der the luw, they sre ordered to porform, and failing | made with which to pay for thoir services, end that | ho amply roturncd the tribute Ly giving tuepoor | Adswn and Justus Kililan, laying damsges ab 1t {ho motion should Lo overruled, I wish to . :fl:’:fi'&:%'fl%fl:fi" ‘u'.“‘;o?.um | "'31 r0, coull be mmvel!zl. 18wt le':‘"h- ol ‘r"a".—’r).'f'.fefi?&fl'fl'.i'f..’.".- Jor },’:}’,.ffi{‘}‘,',"f,,.“’,'.‘.’flfl ': fellowk flome _encouragement Ly stating that it | 210,000, Hr, Pente Opens for Complainants and ;‘;:},;’e:‘;“‘g;,{:f};';'.',;‘;,‘;‘;P;‘;gmg‘;{;j? 700 | e advinars coutd, when calid 4ron. by 1he Coirt | Tundor (i aren o 5. Goust T Jo senied bie anvwor to | Judgen of eleclion, Tho defendants dsuy st wuy | 74 M8 oriufun that the question bf contompt masrnorTeY snnounes the reault of the alection, an_act which, un. | Judges of eloction that no appropriatl TTEMS, 4 \] by 1 b; dga Willl i i 0 1; > ,, 1 elect) d & olut clurka of wYould never be ramed by Judge ams, Ilis | Joln E, Garduer, a dealor {n artifici Judge Lawrence Closes To-Day, ilis honring of tho appiication fue an fujunction, B e 14 e the Gourly 17, il LT | the Ll pon the fact tat tne sw naid that the Com- | o, e Suiges of lectin funed 10 bt Tt 5 Menoineen inwpired thio Loy with tedautled vigor, | No. 11) Clark wiract, flad & patition 0 Therofore, I desired that tho Court pass upon lu«u:mll‘):‘nll_lmn right to canvasa the vate, having no With regard to the ansertion made by Mr., Pence that | but fusist “that 3t “:1 inimat u‘ll uht:l:?r ‘u.., which 1o doubt will earry them ovor another day | cl '5"‘ a bankrupt. Ihe lisbilitios amount to s} e e -Slegal, = o g Jeria i L 8155, Rogister Hibbard will look into i AEL0 f1la N ST.eWOr: menta of the statule must ba adhersdto; othierwise | o inforce Ingal acts,—ho wonld ask the question, Whers | ¢lection ; they deay that two ballol-buzcs were aluo. Aldermuauic Sentiments, 1“‘,\‘{"",‘;;{5‘:‘,{;."?{';"‘: {ho nsatinte connes] are | there was no olection. e e O e avidencas of 1o tleqals | lntely necesssry at each of the moinzrices, 2 | A COUNTERFEITER'S STORY. the mattor. wlieged In ths bill John I. Tobinann, at present a clerk in the and that both propositions—as to 11 then touched upon {he question of authorit coacorned (Storre, Uoudy, Nloot, and himeelf), ! 1 Sauhority 8% | 1477 Tuw bill was incorporation under thiat law, and a1 to mivurlty repe anpporting the proceeing, sdverting to the 1 Cuatom-tionse, filed s yolintary potition. ilig dorstand that wo roprescnt tho City of | Kights, which proviged ' that tbere 1nuat be NOT PROTERLY ENTITLED, resentatisn—cauld mot bo legally submitted at the pornoral lisbilition aro £005.50, hiy hahiliti THE SUPPLEMENTAL BILL. no 2 % 14 began s a bl in chancery, and Suilly ook the : e o h oo 206,00 hidliabilitios an HLFUAAL TO STRIKK 1T 0T, 0 e soptesent tha I tun | there s ol et il ok | 1ty bl casncee, gnd By ook, e sime iz et Uil moe ltoid | flis Explanation of Ifow Riitten- | member of Georzo Reott Co. €280 an e Thio contest betweon nttornoys arising out of | 5hcitt capacity na composing tho Common | Procoss of & Court of Clisncery, ilo denied that thero o astonished If, b!l‘””“"“ week, 1§ took tho | | D places of roviieare nf Tufern: ey aver that ouly bouse Wus Convictod.. Plombar of e druor r:,"c‘if":;h‘";f"_:;’;‘z % Co., tho lesuanca of tho Injunction restraining the | Council,~a political Board, and part of tha | 78980y adequate remedy by Jam, aud would be glad i one bailnt-box was dellvered tu the Judges of alcation, tha geutlemen on ths other side would polntout s o and foslst that more than oo ay not required 1 con- tistiog of houschold furnituro, 18 all cxempt. i ty. As to tho gentlemen This casc was als forred to tho R Common Counell from counting ths vot cast at | machinory of the ci slatutory provislod under which the eloction cauld ba Jaw, and that oven f fi wax & [fail- < in casc was 0l8o roferred to tho Heguster, ® their objectionn, wo are not aware - R . ] tho olsction. which thoy ignored, nttracted a Iarge ffi:‘;".’fi'fi‘;fi":’."-, beon ln’y cuuz:;upn of Gouzt, aud :fi‘;‘,fi}"&'..,?..":‘.’J’:;Xi&'h?.’fl.‘&'.'-’l’;’.‘;'..:.X'fli;‘f.“;u"r”n‘n. s iiroparable injury, howorer, was this”adoption of | n6P x}:fi‘?fi;'vfixifl% o, L moud Cliatges. Agatnat. Washlicrnd, llp':. g‘rmm“ a8 dEsual’ o Ooayu . Pk crowd to Judge Witliams' court-roons vesterday | f oy yo favors in that regard, Wo stand | Oousel on the otler side bad given {heir opinion; | 38 Iucorporation law of 3472,a ¢hing which wan not | deny that the Common Councll and City Clex In the Torning, whon the argumenty woro conttuued. | jitictls upon our rights a8 counnclors and mom- w callod 100 {0 pive thelr ressons for ity | B¢ Rreseus befurethe Qourt, 'l would ey, howmeness | jected and refused to deliver any poll-lual Aman b tho namo of Georg Albert Manon, | py.a o jor eon s soceonie b porence, Compa: L that, while Lie hiad not tims ta go iutn a detelva of o e, A0, ny.an orler was medo yesterday for the Assignes Among tho more prominent persous presout \ gers of the bar in tho prodoucs of tha Coart, [ ARL10 Cuun“e‘n‘rm';:f'.";&:'.’: ;:_h’}n:l.’ ¢ 5o bill, b ol ,'.', o e e Ut g i bl {flff’: ".5..‘,‘.‘.fif{;’-"a?“.fl‘.‘“u‘éf.f&%‘i.?!:‘"‘.fi'"é%"c‘}:,'ii ! who has been convictod of conntarfoiting, and is | to kil the romaining asssts of the Cnmfi‘-ny. during tho day woro £. C. Larned, F, 11. Mac- | bisis & motion to striko tho supplemental bl | gy oon reanssmbnng, % atod Ly (he rossonn publisbed o ite bebialf some faw | ont B J9*0HY, DLUCS BOURCE B0 R B, s | fn Lndlow Street Jail, ias made a long statemont | cousisting of roal ‘catato on West Ilarrieon e . . Tudd, G. I, Ham, Willard Waod- | irom tho filo, & motion that the Couct ought to IUDAE DICKRY Ferka sgo Ly the presagy soeay lafaante fo tha bill tion to Le huld o April 23 Lust, aud that they in. | o8 reporter of the New York Sun, In which ho | 8trest and some Tots in Hydo. Tark s 4l Gosen Veagl, 8. C. Judd, C. 1L Ham, Tionr, becanse it was distiuctly statod vesterdsy | opened for thedofond: He 8ald, bef di Thie apsaker crilfcised the original aod aupplemental |t (ed (hat the question of wminorlty repzes:ntation i amounting to about $2.800, and judgment ard, Ald, Bioat, O'licion, Woodman, Foloy, | Nt io supplemontal bil containad only the ace | (o omeaior e fetenisntr, Me id, before proceeding | bile wni endeavored toshiow ist whiiathis st hai | giouid Lot e -suialdted, and ot no. cierks | S1W18 b0 bave been In the persios of the Q0¥ | \mountiug to nearly 212,600, at pubile L Campboll, Wazran, and MeDonsld, Sonator Ko+ | tiou of the Council Monday night. When Wo | mark In relatlon (o 1he airictures malls Upon Nimmelf | {05 loiar e on Lo eooss of “upaeiting s fonalt | J0Id bo euaployed by ke " udges, ur poil- roment, sud to Lavo been unjusily couvioted. | "ty iy mattar of Goorge 1. lichardnon & Con, hwo, Magor Colvin, L. 1. lioomer, Inspector ruc?ll'vl':m“l't)f'm the donial was withdrawn, and aa sdjudication ¢ foul Oleson, City-Attortiey Jamioson, the Lon, | Yead f, luy (Tuondav) at € o'clock, and | amd lls associates—miot apeciically, bub tho moaning | heeesi g yia for the purpoes of upseiting lla remul | Lovks Xept, a8~ required by “law’ that ‘ile | Referring to the cass of thio man iibeantalned eytiraly now mat- ery Talpabie, e Logged {0 dny that s bad no | e i eendeciree I\ a8 b b eaer Ina | [orie of rétuens of wwe fudsis of felection ¢ mTTENNOLEE, it clit the Counell aro in cmiravention of expressed statutea | convicted hore this winter of baving - | by default outoreg. hafay e o | Al Tulay thon dowrad to point out wherels | besand el to gratif i e aller, no leiale | Goura Ghsacorylo sesrainn mublis oer 1o tne | (e oieloc IR sy | Gonleted, haro i wluter of baviog con 1o CITCTIT COURT. Thomas flogne, Tom Drennam, ox: 1L was not & supplomentnl il perfurmance of & duty impored upon him by taws It | Gloal an'do hot comyply with the reqnl t manay . ) Bay! Edwin Walker commeticod » sait aga P 3 Chicago who was opposed 0 tha adoption of the act of | Rei o duty tmpored Upon hit by e & | Hlleyal au1 do Lot comply wita the requirementa of thio | of Col, Washbutno, of tho Seciot Sorvice : i inaticed o puit agsinst the den, and St. Ulair Sutherland. i sk “mlCm:rl.dm"la) ngllvc!lol‘n but roiterated bis | a4, and therefora did not apycar o secomplinh 51 | yore were Lo b sor sside by, & Job of afidavite which 1-;. , The defendsnte uilude Lo tha vuts 1 eonteunity | ®y g 1o gn Weet 10 cantirs the, tntyoriiat Chicago & Iowa Railroad Companv to racover 3 ’ o] 01 s . which pasacd tha Councl ri} 25, and wax salwes £9 ’ i tition to he appointed s Notary Public. % ® | mont which aboiild Lo at onca s gusrantes of immumty | 4ucab Ratlroad Company to recover 31,000, Ifonor intimated that, on this marning, the con- quently sai r, l'moe"rnny iave nat yat been deniad, e wan rosonsidered hecamo tha Gonncil wera ad. mi y , lut the parsago of the 8sme wae in violation of | [rom secidontal arreat and of roward, He refuned 1o THELOUNTY cotur. OF tho defendants, it was that, no far o tho | IYDE an opfulon in Yegard to thia question of Jurlt- | 3fr Siirre—They have not yet, bt in good time tha | JUA€ Ehat the Paosd ¢ Riva thin, aaping that it was coutrary to the customs of | _ In the matter of tha ostate of the late Gon. eidesaioor 1o st b:il:zlmb:::;;"'::“:&“_} orfinal Uil waa cancerund, that Gaurs " pavar | LSt s et AR emiop st S s | gt e Ll o fedud et e s ronat o e st auit reomaldy | Wiy dietofon. 1fe promised, howover, that I sliould be | Calsb C., Siblos, grant of administration was is: only to 3 i e : v | "dir, Muley thou road the bill, aud subse- mid: IF tho Court ploaso, I undersland you that, s bo- undarstood tho position | tfons had boow cst dpon him s Lis assoclatos for , and ps wants o, by thi of) ft bad 3 vassad b smply rewnrded by hiw: Becretary Bristow and Consul | mued to Nancs Sibley under a ), uill, NEYER COULD IIAVE, JUMSDIOTION, e N s it Tharpesker deoted (hat there was any neceesty for pragf ; ey b%:l o :‘:’Qfi: e‘l\zn: ;edmm- Sbri0y spansoce 10 b, shouid, Le appealed to 81 | e, on0. Tit puretics wara " Buiventr Wiier , 5 3 it # \racrglnary procedding which ren election wera before thum, in the lisnds of 8 Lo . g d William F. Endicott. Tho pi by of ‘The Conrt—I did no. . or any right (0 iksuo a \rrit of injunction 0 | to glre Lis sincera apiuton of the luw in writing sa tt | o0 Sttt MO RERELCCR M B UG Of law. s et lihe s ticy:thet (hat a1l the taeme | Went ta Chicago, aud thoace journosed to Galeaburg, | 30! o property of tha Judgo Dickey—Upon examination of tbe the »«umvfimemnl Inll, they took 1o auch position. | was the duty of his Honor, when the queation was mib- % o Phorp e G e el At b A s e v, 4 q 5 i 14 tyi i M | wheeo I met Fete and Levi AcCarthy, Ben Doyd, John | deccasad consistod i ouo promissory note of F. B o oarument of the | 1 tho pame muttor i bean ot out in the arigtc | mitiel o hin under Illrp’u.\d'lut(lu ins case o decky e o e et e oeriey | yan® o fle Cotuctl ke of tie facts alled la e | Friatie, Geor.e Frout, Jobn Hall, Mike Rogers, doo | U. Sibley, of Totis, Mich.. for $2.530.67; one of supplemental bill after th iyl nat bilas had beenset ont in tha supplemental bl::en ;‘2‘:‘:“.:-:‘?:; ;:‘fx.anv'rz:‘g”& “‘:‘Sufié‘fi’h‘&xfl‘e- duty, and ask d hist mauner that benenied the | which wers not made until afrerthe action was bad, m;lrl Jack Iuttennouze, and twenty or thisty others | Julia ', McConnell, of ‘lum;,. for 32,510 one Court yestorday (for wo liad no oppurtunity to | uill, » difforent question might havo arisen, Ile 2ol saidhat ity badl aivine (e Conncil 1o clere: | oney If the Comnmon Oouneil bad no right to examine | and that they knew that tha elcction in the worda of | TU? had coms tuere ta buy counterfolt money. I | of Bylvestor Sibloy. of Clicago, for §1,035.12 ; noo 1t duriug 1o aession, Mr, Penco ualug it), we | submitted that the mosion to mwrike tho lattar | &I R 0 N e raugit in + dhote wera no pro. | 1010 questions of frauds the duly before thema wis the | the sald Lill of campiutot was Hllezal for (b ressnns funle them bedexo that 1 aulll Bad In Rockestor (o | ons «f Sibley, Endicott & Co,, of Chicago, for find that, inetead of boing moraly 8 supplomental | from tho tilos waw wull takow, on account of the | eeedinge on that yuestion ; S o relt than 10 was mor | Sope o s of sanvaesing thavotucnn sulsmnounelng. | aieged In the il ot tiat the voftisus of the Julces 'y e T ich Lhad aold to Wash- | 85,0003 smd money in thy Hibornia Havinge b, s porion of & In devated to_allega- | Smecdoanis, foe thoy woro nothiug, miore, i | axsty cermuase o e sueet hat Lo mollver of | Whv et alon o the”La vt Bt venied | Eoniot Gl . ot Chrk e o ‘| e 00 8 Suinaon o e eadere, e Aur | GG, S0 Gobomimiont, 1000 T soaia tionmot taw o, s 1o My it o g apon “lonve o lo a supplameatal bl 45 f:l:‘:c?ll’l,u( oation and diiciased tow, - Lo bad Wl | Coged e O e e | Beter Lo aclara the cloction Lol Aprl <3 fo ane | aien 25 63/ i, s 16,00 ik tonder 420 coun | wan valued at 220,000, Tl heirs are Houry I, tho fiing of tho first, biil, s etail matlers occurri ince ng | lonart o i Sentis! persons, Too frontisyisco of the book wan | under the General — lawe and (hat sny cof | lerfelth ‘makiug ’slogotier neany $1,010,000 of | Mary @, Bylvester, Frank C., and Frederio W portain in any rospect to & Aupplomental bill. | of tho origlual bill, partics attompted to injed grance ol onnion awiong atee e o eIoRth was worthicss, and, conaenently, | twem bave d iia any att i rtard (o the sietian | 4ueer” They took mo luto thelr confauce, and fo- | Hiblay, hiat subject—some thought ona courne was wiss 3 structed ms L go 10 Philadelphia 10 affvct thy ¥ 7 . futo 1t atlerations which ought to have been in | 20 % ha best thing to do was Lo reject the whols voluma, or deelaring its resn f,0thier than they were commaned- LS D 0 ofluct the relcare Tha will of Azel Boon' was prov d latta: n thi Trupe| i A proven, and lattars Cortainly, Judgo Luwronce, whots ho stated itn | i b 0 G Tobiors “wilicn, arome bafare it | s e e vias serns o bay st hie mvi o AR, GOUDY @1 todo by law, aud wae Fequired of tuem by tuir | Of tho confederstes fu prison iiere, 1 was to empu¥er | tagtamentary Issued to Anna G aud Adolph coutents, liad not examinod 1t kimsolf, and could | oo Sveh ~ o thought the Court would strike it " . tce, ' The defendsuisadmit i thelr answir e rrender the §% ond $20 plates Buflice it to m not have known what they worey sud I nalt | fiom the files. 'Thoy desived to kuow whateo | grew out of a mirapprche: liat the aencrtion wan ratultovis, wad | 731 thet e did not understand that the question was | oatus (rtion o ratultont, 800 | fhe giving of eNeet 1o frauduleat sicction, The | that, at & regular meeting nf tie Coramon Council el | 10 conalderatlon of the zelease of the prisoucrs. Tistrand, undor an fodividial bond of 84,400, ¥ 4 3, the Council proreeded o gan h 2 . . . . . v The will of Nicholaa Laly was proven, and lot= therofore, that o be allowed now to suter a mo- | tion the Court would take before deciding whoth- | aay that question was ot wa to, the proprleiy uf adontion of 4 May 3, the o B o oute of the slactors; | 1 méanwhtls xrranged to lsliver’ up i ontlre gang | tors testameutary iwsued to Hrvnsiake Lads, tion to N or thoy would filo auy suswer. The Corporation TEVORL THE PROFER FORUM the present sytem of Qity Govornment, arl et they "delared that tlie vots was in favor of | b Clleuzo. "Dittenniowse engaged to coilect the waug | under au individusl bond of £6,800. The two biils were entirely dlatinct ia_{Uelr charac- | adopting tho General law of 157228 1he charter of there by Dee. 1, I promised to turn over the bag of t Connsol was mistaken in saying that ?. auswer | he wonlil not undertake to throw an abstrictlon in the In tho matter of Lvanston and Now Trie STRIKE THE RUSTLEMENTAL NILT YROM THE FILES, | 0y 0on nroparad, 1¢ Liad not. ‘They'wera lo- | ey of any lozd and logitimate pracesding for e The origital bill sek forth that the election shoul | thevity bra majority of 1443 votes, sud that thoy | Seunteffens supposed to be in Rochester on the ranie P " wpon tho ground that 1t 4 not o supplomental | §irye on ft, 1¢ tite aupplomontal bitl hiad con- purroie of uncarthing auy fraud that inay he alleged i e e e oy N34ty e s1€ ambo | Ditch, oujoatious of Morton Gondon ovorruled, A uyed on socoust of a wrong, while thie second bill | ordered tho result to be spread npon tue records of the | {1 Aeinbicago o aud ordor of confirmation ; appaal pra:ed to the bill; and Mr. Tuley, having ozaminod it 1o de- | tuinad only what Judge Lawronoo ssid 1 did, | ins ssseiates desve f over wh wickeduovs f £o.pro. | 7415 (s nature of a bil contediing i eloction, aud | elty, sud declared, the sate, on ‘s quostiog ef ul',fif’fi-.“.f’x'&m“n‘?&'.mfiaJ#?hfi'."-':.fi‘:\.i’.‘.'&'flfi,‘, Cireots Conrt nond ta bs G100, cantionct Toe tafl, will polut ont tho objeationsble matter, if - they probably would not havo lled any answer. | mote ita ends, It the question was prosented » 1o | 0y e e e Jogui* fgnt Uof tie | minority reprocemiation Ly @ majority of | ¥heto the comnterfuiters slopped. Prery night e i | payment of asseusment upon the lands touching 7 Judse Lawrence said the motion was whetlier the parties complainant had come Lefore s ) ' ordercd sa1d remwt > be spresid upon | Yited me to his houee, where his plfed me with Hoitand | which tho appesl 1s taken, to be filed and s tho Court will nilow him. d that Lie (Tal 27" AN EXTNAORDISARY ONE. | foram (whigh Ly Iaw s’ peavided for the invstls 5’5’5?"‘3‘ e “E'x'x‘“u‘fi?” amrs, aimel e i T:-‘-‘:if:'-',';';a‘:’-_f:fi-n‘x: 18 provhted 1n_ sad by Ba Rittentiouso srrivedon | yroved during the term; appeal objected to E; Tho Court—T undertun o (Tulor) 8- | 1oy ind o right o fla tho bill Indepondently of | gais of suck questbome, Tiat s douled and | fuf"'any” act \inder ‘fle charter of 1872 Thers | 3 uf Art, 1 of maidack that the Judges of eleotipn | U & 3l 3all (hat 'he, f coin ' couid not come on § counsal for Comunistionats. pears for the Aldermen, tho order or permision of tho Court; it | 2o thatfhere wes anyibingin tho rucord in i case | was but ono allegation in the original billla support | held upon tho questinn of incorporstion uudec the o e e e fina . anl hay CRIXLXAL COURT, Judgs Dickey—Ilo appears for the olty. was o matter Of Tight befora tho AnAWer | B e f o e ot an wog | Of the fuvalldity of the slectian—that tle notico of | act slull make roturus of sueh wiection 1o the City Muroew o eh i ahpen I8, Jobn Smith. Indiced for burglary; continued g 4 P s to fanuo an injunction pendents lits, Such a8 Was | giecijon liad failed to mention the queation of minor- | Councll, twiose dutles 1t shall be to cuuvass such ro- uFne win vaty angry that the whola gang had i [} till tho 24th 1nst. 3lr. Pence—Is thore au appenrauce entored? | camo in. As & matter of procaut o, | aaked for. oy o The resilt b canyass to be en. | 1Ot arrivel, aa ho badall usrangements made to cap- 2 _‘:‘d o Dickey—No i lowavor, in consequonce of tho pendoncy of tuo WIIAT WAS IT PROTOSED TO ENJOIN ? :‘g,.i?,":.‘:;‘,‘:‘{{}:‘. :fl,,':':uc ".‘,‘n{’:‘;’:, ?: “.‘L‘."'...?u'tz fl‘;';f un':‘nw:.:-w:dr:"xl :nfc;“m;?n;:u' that in so | ture theni, lis was very soxious to do something big. | Eilen Morrisser, tried for the larceny of cloth- v, Donco—_Parties must appesr, otherwise | injunction, iy had anplied for loave to” xmeand | The adoption of tho act of 1§72 was ot 1ike s vote | {5 yequire stich notice by the Mayor orsuy other | cauvaraing the returneaud declariug the ranuits there. | 4 wis sbout to move s fawilly to Wosiiugion, 1u | ing from the rosideuce of ir. Tumlinson on boy cannut be Leard. the original bill mithout prajudica to the injunc- | tu remure u county-seat,—uot like te act of couuty | officfal, The allegations contained in the original bll | of, aud catiaing thio same to be epread upon the rocords | CIVEFE) oL oS LoM) S rent, ro that b i Park avepue ; verdict, guilty, and term of pun- or cannutbe Leard. - ire to close onr | Uuns and now the othur widb come in on cota- | allcers in construciing 4 buildiog ot » given poiut for | ignt be excallewt avidouce 1u » casa of cantestul | tho Counl, woro ouly comyhlag with the mandale | JInsul Moviag expenses fo the iat Be <ould | ishmont fixod at Imprisoumont in tho Peniten- e Dy Ceriu. T prestume von | inioan’s motion to continuo tho origiuai ne | {8 PAITSSSIIAS SOUNY, (LLRL 1S Anidver Ciemtion, but they wers n0} competzat 0 deciars tho | of (he liw in thal fezard, sod i so actiog pens rossury, o ao- | (homont X0l st o toit, e A great deal biad been 41 ahout the Charter of Oh i b e o el e ae e Commsoy | cordingly pus up & job on Ritteuliouse, Hegave wo > ean do so. This, ns 1 understand it, i a prolim- | Junction, and to oxtond it azainst & 0O PATLS, | cago boing simply a piezoof patchwork, T o e et of ths Court uf, Cinwery ta | Oovwcl of tho. Clty of Cicagor. Tho defendanie sds | coubierfcls money snd 8 kes to Littentiouse's Edword Walton, tried for the larceny of & . 1o Walta i simply upon the mattors allaged in the supple- "l bat to Court bad radittion 10 | ® detective, whowucceedsd in putting §50 in queer | coatj verdict guilty: undernge; remanded, inary anpliosiion; Lt Lo not upon & hearioe, sud | yyoutal pil, whicls had pecarsed sinoa tha ling interfers ia such mailess s the pressnt he dechion | it aud sl 8 ,:,‘,m,:(,‘,; iet i mo Juriaalelion 19 | b, oyl wuekuown to tun viiizk, Nest moraing Iut- | MAry Jobnson. tho womsn, Who was iudioted H Cainedny, but it is nw application oads | Of tho origimal bill, and moved to dism'es that e cention, A muods was rovided for conteats of | Uill,and thet the Injunciion ko isstied ie absotutely | fenbouse aud T eutered (he train to go to Mur. | with her husband for committing n assauit on ipon 8 rotuin-day, o d bill. They (compiainantd) aaked for a continn- | ent with bould remain in force aud be | gicctlons of all kinds, b null and vold; that tho Court hiad nn furisdiciicy to | lugion, Washburneand two detectives also were o | Joseph Patterson somie moathy ago, was on by tho complatnants for an injunction pundeuts | o rldeiniinotion by virtue of the atlega. | Sbplicable to euch city, as tough such chaugs had | The question was which oourt was ihe praper ons to | entertain the origiual bill fled in the cause, or o tasu tho cara, At Aurora Washburne ariested Rittenbioute, | 4r1a), The jury returned a vordict of guilty, and Iito, 1t s beon uanal alwaws to sllow, the st | 4ichen tho original bill, aud'for & furtbar ine | BOLSakenplacs, Thesioption of tassct w.s not ths | oy thecute, but graing ihat e Gircul Court vas | the ipjupeiin shd by the hame Leett of et e e praoacr arse roreg foupd e £0 | fised her pulsbment st imprisonment 1o the 8 analiit Wnoman unction agast Lhe ity by virtua of tho allega- | i o of the it i sluiply maldig | was the 'proper ons, ine eae war a siat- tonio the jurladiction a if they had wpechilly act up | ) \riog Tana seritenced to elght yuars in Joljet. | Penitentiary for five years, ba it o conto bofore i aticer wh ib ket | oL Gt it Tl and s apoiia: | ot T ot ik Soe Aok a5 wh tnjune | Lo o8t A0 12, ol Bod, ne it 5 bt | L S byt i, e S i | Gttt e e o | PRS0 T for areny vestie b l:( nst rt whother it Bo‘befora this | t100 WaR bused upon mattors which bad occurred | tion wasasked to declare that it was not so, tlat the Court had tne Hght nt the 10juaetion, | fraudulent acta, and all other matters and things § aaill 20”1, ** Bluford Wilsou fa s friend of mine, | not guilty, J:‘I‘l‘lcgn n‘;fl’s clf::bn'r:fmd thoro fs no formality | sitco the filing of tha original bill. ''hey were | The gentlcinen asid geeat duniige would rosult, Lut | and thiat the complainants oughi to have it warded | charged agalnut them In the orlginal bill, which tey will approve snrtlilug 1 door ask,” The capture THE CALL. andescrived 1o sensationa) mafcative by Obicago o < willing to taka the chances for an injunction upon | 10 one had condascended to pofat ft out—that great | (em, the speaker alluded (o Lie trouble which would | ask 1o be dismilssed. wa Jupor Garr—169, 175, 177 to 184, 186, 187, sbontla iingy Thegalis tohusie the cxiginal bl 88 it stood, T i mrong wera to be doue} bt it wab not to b pre- | ariss fram The continning of We injuncilon, and aa- e {Rrialss which esadlisd Cok: Waaliburns wikdsions | (io'togtn, ; 4 o it BB e (o s oation that Your | bosn ma o & paitr, and pon ihe new matter at- | B J D ot Ul e w4 | o e e L o THE ALDERMEN, ARRENTING TEE M CARTTITN. Jepox JAMESON—16, 13, 19, 25025, 30, 8, 83, Hmmr|nmdf ynatderdl. llllmn! partiod lncmluemd)t. leged in tho supplomental bitl, withcut reforenco | did not understand that there was any such thing a8 | ond a half of doliars, - Tho wheels of the Gity Gororn. WHAT THEY TRINK OF THIXOS, Then lie gocs 00 to tell of his following the | 35 36 41 to 47 inclusiva, not being allowed to be heard in Uaurt either by to the additional stiength that might be giyen to | continuing an Injunction grauted for s cartain number i k. MeCarthiya to St. Louts and arsesting the Junor Moonk—34, 87, 93, the -pr)lutmn by tho sllepations in tho aupple- | of days, lmnhnmlll-rprgpodlll tobs enjoined was not ",.'f.",‘. “'.'f,:'s b':f.‘x‘n’g.‘:: b’ol‘ uf:e“ 'fi'r“egi’;nd -‘:‘:5 Whiea bus lieted tapponyLioh, Y ialioon Joanarate et S oo A g tham e e ot osantred. befare s oopiae] | SUeh st was protatly mikiin (he Scomm o ab. THNES | Toicamans o™ bar “imon ™™ brasgy | Writh oms can alwaya fall baok upon the fujunc- | & S0sPesaic siuggie, Fars ho: filing an auswer, or by couueol, or in person, bi Jroas Rooxea—T4, 76 to §0. o app lcation to this caso in itu resont condi- | inouta JCDOMENTS. Hon,—not matter over which the Court Lad jurisdic- . The Mlayor's bill. tho North Avenua lot | 1tried to bring Washburne to 8 settlement of my | yurrpn raves Cinovir o tion, ‘That ralo applies onty in cases whoto tho | bilt v)'n;“lg'm;- ‘liosa matters (companaon of | |Cuniich Would warrant thi rbuanco of ey [noued, m drcition olidiulus - Deammend, | s un:x O o Ao dos | roward.for arvuating the WeCaribys. Tnad alvendy | _GIHR Wit irn oo, Ok b o parties have bean fndged in contempt. There in Voos) wera of n imporiance. Bud Loest uryod bt Lo election should be sst aside | Jug from the bunidjug of the LaSalls stredt tannel, on | COmPHEAtIOn, R Srent over SLUN on st Disiuces, Ara. Thomak. | fus 2 Cole, SLIFLAL, nothing of thas kind here. The quention of con- Nh'l“h’f—“v?ll" tha °;““=°‘ pormit the DeW | pocause it was absolutely vold, B e thats wille the sompatuant. was dloiriy | Inepector, luve s depth which is fatliomable, | suce toom we dismanied in our fabt, demanded | "fryirep frates Dissnicr Covnr—3upox Dopazre {empt, has not boon brought bofora tiio Court at | matter to be stricken out TILE ONLY GHOUND PRESENTED entitiod to damagos, s would not stay s public city { but the fnjusction and tho great contemps buve | Yiiitarne, as it was a vou ber for the deaperateness Jeukius, Asaiuee of Mayhon & Co., va. Danel . Thuroja nothing loro save on afidavit in | _Judge Lawyence—We cortainly prefor our own | was that the Couucll falisd to submit, at the same | siprovement, ut would leave the compiainut to ob~ | ;,0¢ ot been gamndod. Tho beauty of the wub- | of the contést. The ltems are: Damage Lo erpots | Aillowes sud Thines B bresott, §1:449, Which, Incidentlly, facta’ are spokon of which | methed af couducting our case. We shall tie they submitted the act of 1874 for adoption or re- | tain Ll redreas after the committing of the act threat. | BOVT i 70t &1 Geatroyed. 3305 dimiage 10 Leddiuy desiroyod, $18; | BUPEIIOR COERT—Coxresuoie—L, I, Anufeldt ot may or may not bo' contompt, aud about which NOT G0 TO OUR ESEMIES FOR ADVIOR. Jection, the question &s,ta whetbor the Yoters snould | ened, He called the attention af the Courtlo a cass | joct iu tho infinits longth to which tho lino his S Tt 0 3 damago 10 thrre beiateads b fl-_"('l LN, Belly, §40..0, $11.80; damage to & Ginv—George 1T, Cowles va, W, C. Doak- two cliairs Lroken, $1,803 danige to four lamy g adupt the ucliemno of government called minority rop- | in Glst IlL, in which it was elleged thera was nosu- ' 8- question tho partios would havo a night to bo ‘The Judga then roforred to tho sourne of pro- perripd, m’umn T T __nun‘ mm-‘rr-“ s ng ;" slroady been paid ont by tho Oittzena' Associ: | resentation. He then called th £ i ., . ¢ 808 | man, §343.20.—T. J, Spllnan_ve, James 3iyna hoard. £t in lald down fu sovaral coscs that an | ceduso In the easo of the lling of & vapplement- | {%le siatite, f e | T o e e o Bindosiny, taq | tiom, aud a8 5ot no voioshiun sung out * Dottom1 " | broken, $1.80; daage 10" oay tstle broken, 8181 | 3T, W, Ghase’ va. 1053 B, Dasiels Py bty application for an oxtension of an jujunction in | &) bil contebilug THEs & FRAHAS GBS R | such duty wi o Gty Gouncl { on the | electlan, b tws persons served with it dlarcgardod | Haw many more fathoms aro to be paid ont, to- | S1miEe 0 ¥idtow Shbes il Fanes beokes, 3iitng | If Tisap e, J. I, Dileher, G, J. Dewey, 3. 5, McCabe, one that depends upon tha quortion which is fn- | Waa aquivalent to asking the Court tosayt * I | contrary, the question was submiticd to the voters by | the injnction, and held sud announced the election, | dyyig sction will tell, Mennwlile the Alder- [ and walls, £23; fsaof rest and discomfort, $10. To- Deanis Fifzgerald, Jacoh Weber, and C. A. Spencer, volvad in the question as to whothor tho party ja | ML Liosr this spplioation, sud, aftor it s | opurationof iaw, aud the Mayor aud Council had doud | Tie Gourt fined (e partics for contempt, but the Su- % il r $10. 2 o $1,200,87.—Monrve Heath et al. ve, In contempt of not, and that on such guesiion | bosrd, if 1 am of opivlon that the now | as alleged in Ihdsnswer, evetything that the ‘Droxas Goart ield that the Conrt bad ©o jurisdition, | manle eraft cootinues to sail on turbid | WL AR $.300.—3ary E, Ilabertaon :suburhe pretended to think that my services % dtter Incorporated into thim supplemental bill | requircd that they shoull do jn ihat regard, If9t | and rayersed the deolslon. In bls declulon in the L " fed for : cn{:;;]l‘l]:l:u:fg‘x?h';‘l‘::n:n‘i‘nhnl(lgxn'f,—ofhu Cifuiey of | theroin, the action of the Court in roforenca to | thedueation of misority tepretoutution, be wauld oy | lo | dectda | between, | shedlente lo 1% (4% | tothem. Awa consequendo, all their converss- | offured nie §9), ssying ua 1 was bard up 1had better | Same va & M Woal, 430,60, 11, G, Powers, Ausignre, gt ] 2 st they had dona so, » Tho statute did o} preacrive | tos decres ‘ourt, he shoa r of the RS . ;31 3 3 fli Coutt, i promoting. iha- exocation of the | ho prantiug of the Infinctiou will bobated pon | suy wmuaser 15 ~bich i abould be doue. aois 05 | forates %01 Gourt, e ould declds n fasor,ofthe | vion is limited o this one all-absorbimy topic. | take ft T'woald not Lesr of akiog any such sum, but | F'41" and i, W, Hurllut, 430,83 D, Warren e adiuitarius jastie, by nressin | matters In the original and supplomental bill, | 163 againet ft bad ucen printod by order of tho Gouns | igit to obey the law, but it becamo hia duly to do wo, | They treas the subject phulosophicallr, ‘and, | del (R fo Hivaneeme 8115 Pk I SRE S arcis Jiich ve, Ira that rule boyond whers &m law liag pYneml it. | independently of wlat mav havo been praporly | cil, aud distrlbyied at the polls, That he thought dis- | He might sutfer 1o perfarming thia duty, but bis vin- | under tho influence of tha pervading ides that | iy ge. 1 threatancdto goto Chicago aud ez o ot o, va, B, H, Me- Thoso govtlemen ossociated with o were em- | ibiraduced,” if Your Houor shal] ba of opinion | poscd of ur blflhluu\uq overyiliug elio in it related | dication would come (o the end, In conclusion, My, | they mill be punished for contempt, quite an ex- | 1o 1ha job by which Le kad procured the conviction David ' Douglass et al, v Hame, ployed by the Mayor and Comptroilor ; the law | tiatanything has been Improporly lnlrnsuc‘d' to contesting the eloction, Tt way vaid that the oles. | Goudy submitted {uat there wea no Jurisdiction 4 the | gited opipion of Judge Willisma has arwou | of Rittcnbiouss, Iwent out &4 if 1 meant Lusiness, Providow that thoy mav emplay comusel for tho | Inottiar words, the Gonte would deoldo tio mor, | (5%, Hicr, 5, =2uiesiod I & sauet of chuiceyy e Court eitier by the ocigiualor the supplomentil bl | aong tuom, and v alresdy preadug. Just tbo | althosgh 1" latended ‘to g0 ouly to Bolct: city; tho city has an interest In this qnestiou,— of sho application nuder the supplomeutal L ‘ernando Joues, . . Deakman, 10, —leorge bcolt, use, etc,, ve, R, M, Johnson, -Aaron Iilies et ‘nl. vs, 0. D, Bansum, §$577,— mon Rotuscuild et als va, Bame, $133, Bame, §31.25. . McCormizk va, O, e 2~ | gpposite of thi would ba the moro Ikelr, fudg- | tor Wikon's ~ofice. Defora ' I _ resched EEER I A e arondant, —and upat that gronnd | bill upan metcly s preliminary motion nuch 88 NO AUEQUATZ REMEDY FROVIDED BY LAY, Pittussta to s writ of infin tan, iliat, by the mheds: | itig from thio contrary spielt which thoy hive ail 1100 overtook nie, and usod il blaudishmenta EShlile Liassoanel al, ve. 3 party ty P [ o took it thiat whero the Laxislature liad under- of tho b, tiey ware nop uy remedy o e fs £y thoy bavo thoy (dofendants) make now to arike the bill | {1, roviia » trode. thes theresy fndicated thir | atif & case conld bo made out whare the Court had | along exbibited fn tno figot for incorporation, | 1o Rerials MOt gl D0k 1%, Jhicice With Secretary 57,—C, 11, McCormick vs. Willltn Longhiurst, 'UNQUESTIONADLY A RIONT TO BE HEARD frotn the files, and thua the Court would not hiear 3 wilt that 1 ahould ngt b dons i s couri of chaucary, | the power ta is e the writ, It should mot be esercieed | Audwhat in Detatow I showed hine my wounds and recounted my b Lrick Q:’uuw. e Au‘hrllll""r 3 e folly upou every branch of the cane. ‘The city it all, An oxamination of the law of 1874 wonld domonstrate | i tuis vase, Lecause * the cousequences wero 100 fear- THE MOST NEMARKABLE PART OF IT ioas. Js 1ald me togo to Bolicitor. Wilsan, who Peter Low vs, Charles i, 1L 14 . fo boyond all doubt that it was the in‘ention of Geus | ful to conleiplata " with refereuce to public ngl i o1 i Just 2t} ton va, Johin McCormick, 338,—0, H, Lee va. Bamuel Lt a doeo futerost as jo what sesteatut el bu 1 He cateatad that, whue Teave was glven o iy foos vieare Hiotions horeaftof shoupd | b 1t would be Fepouiu poar i aJudge which | 1% that iuve not that kind of an exaliod opibion | waull miaks g B er i ts Waskbarng: o WLsoR | . svors, $100—1% U, Beed: sdminiaipaicr, v O, D aid ypon-har ofiears.. Asidu from. thet, L og-)[ f6.wsdpomenth o the Lurpons of K0S | naver gotuto & oourt of chaucery, The gentlemon ordiug Lo our fupm of goverument, coutiolled by | \it SR, TSR AR HORC B0 RIS (B otor d Ak & liberal sotitoment with | S:uum, $240.~T, & Juckeon ve, Thu darine Compre doratand that thore have beon uo procoodings | ditcing matter arising subsaquant to the Aling of | couid not escape the doctriue by cuntendiug that the | the valce of the people, wouid never be tolerals Nor s {t of that klud that ° ravelor uy of Ulcago. SLISIT—Auauda 5, Cauk v, S, fnstitutod— % Use origiual bill, the Court vould also grant leays | etatutory proceeding was 1o ba coustrusd strletly, snd, E. W, Buatchford & Co, sutertains towards tho pursuing wolf, The | 3 ervices and Lis scars. | gf o:4 Lucy £. Drigge, ——— 3 ance e, 2 ! o : Judge Lawrenco—If yon will allow me to in. | Lo incorporate matiora wmp}; might, {ndopend- | unless it was ample, that it would give the court of WER chauge is unscconntatle, *";‘_‘l',‘;_j;“},", AR T would Sy andnting ouly |y {815, Tade & Forman vi, 0. b, Allen, SLE04.002 torrupt you ono moment, perliaps wo can settls | ently of the supplomantal bill, proporly be mat- | chancery jurladiction, Lo ineisied tlat the worl THE ANSWER. Ali'yestorday nottang but {njunotion and con- | $i0¥ell yevuation of fioal payment, Keop limas | £yt Bockmit v Doty M, e K tcelaior it If Your Houor plenso, wo aro entiraly will- | ter of amondwont, “cqnvasn,” In ita broad ycuse, eaut s 10 fnveatigate,” = tempt wero talked around the Iiall, except whe | work, Yours truly, Bruronn Wissow | § S s S nLs b on ey, 4736 8. D, ing, if tho Court itsolf thinks it is prapor ko do 31, TURRE, T HEPLY, , t was applled Lo & werw ministorial olticer, [ The following fs & summary of the answor | some one more eutagod than the rest openod & | Waskburue studied awhils ever the Roliclior's pote, | ruduen v, don J, and O, Lo Hpalding, #1021 80, to allow thoss gentlomon to be Leard. I | urged that no mojion had hoon made fn Gourk ta | e at T e & e T ie body ta leg. | Mubmitted by defondsuts, covoring about sixty fir of explouive but iaiialens oxgletivos against | then e rer ur b paver and banded to me. 115 Sl 3 Tl v 0 T Babrook mean, wo are willing ta ) introduce any such mattor in the supplemonts} differeace T foolscap pages: the Citizolly, Mapdl L Eitorims ud roclved t . ashe | 0040, B, 3 i ] WITILLRAW OUR OIJEOTION UL Tha Toave grhinleu o7 the Conrs bad boon | - Judds Dickey repiied that it dLd. Mo dld mot say | *They dewy that the Common Council id ot provids | ited, owing ta tho euparior aitraztions in, the Iaigeel I T, sud socoiial i BIoRER, o bumes, I8 ST o 10 thelr belng beard, Wo oro willing tint this | sbueed,—tho introduotion of matter which co- | Where thio statute conferred & duty which was claarly | for s submfssion fo s vate of this people of the queation | CuBrt-rovm above, from and towards which [ (0l yo4 wigy tea AL E. )y =T, 3L, " bo i 1 sali T suppoeed it wax s recelpt | {57856 "ive 3. b, Stortimee et al v3 miusterial {n Its nature upou a deliberativa body that 8 Jotwof tiw people of the question | 1) ere was & coutintious curront of tha great con~ | forgul) advesce, lo Araured mo i was & receipt n | Lrdley, ued. i, et al,, v, this Quty becamo. Liereby anything but tlusteriat, O ek fha nuestion of IBcortbration | temptuous aud othor city ofiicials, Tho fore- for o sl Catn whalacever. T Gotaanded to huye 1t | burh Juhiu Mcjutyee, W, £, ool cago ahinll bo falrly and fully srgue ugh, 3. G. Pow. 3 o C. T, Wheeler sud Jihn' Morris ; Vesdlct, $353.7, and Vo ean | ourpod before the fl‘lng of the ongiosl bill b reliovo Your Honor of any embarrassmont on | ing placed tha supplemental bill upon an entire. If the sfatute aald ¢ compute ! or count,” he should | 15 le, 3u. iving of (hirty days’ was spent by a large majority of them | destroyed, and ofsred to returu the money, e ze- —4, W, Wiy our own, by witbdrawing our objeotions but, in | tho oity, by which La supposod the peoule wero Teliberative Lody, was capabis of a diMerent ooustriice | Sl 1 b takon o (he Queatial af ESnority reyro: | Saslautt o m;“‘,.,,":,‘“f;n“}_?“"l‘,'e“:_‘: Aouct | A ason says ho then want off 1n the employ of | &t T gl i b i doing that, wo mugt aak Your lonor to impoae | mesut, sud be claimed that the Court should | Hon from what 8 would have whon spplisd to & | sentation was neceassry, They deny that sucti ballots | 878 t by tho Ireasuiy to ind & certain countorfsit plate, | Doyle e sl va. John G, Eif:t, 191 12—E. IL Cope suoh torms a8 you bave the right to do | pavs upon the motiou, ju order that they might | mivlsterial obicer, Ifothrew this out withuut, how= | g were cast for or sgainst minorily representation | tion was dietasteful to them, but by no means ek L e s v, John Davis, 87570 o gold,—Aosew ITate in any ciso. Wo undorstand that Your | know whether thoyshoitld auswer of nok, 1f the | 87er,auy oviwconfdence in-the soundusws of the | wers wholly or at all vold, because of the alleged | dovoid of interest. Dutfcw of them could sos | a0d was succossful, 3 3 any woll-detiued points {n his argument, but | T procesded 10 Washington atter I had oblained :‘:?flf‘; Lt fll‘ffi\fl;{“fwmu $1.0,—Wendeun Meyar “ o Uo | then thoy looked throngh the leatoru spocts- possession uf the cousterfels plate, Onwrrval ihers L | “Cmovir Covit—upos Roarns~Trederick Em. tlon, ar beliu “lhl’hell'm:fi(.:fi olca of prejudice, und sk & cousoquonos, Mr. | HEFel 10T I Tenson, who Y e to calt upon | ™ et al, va, Augustua Has: 3 9,5%—T, Leve Honor dasires to hiave tiie argument closad to- | gentloman would strike pys all the allegations of | Poitou. non-aubtuisslon of the question of minorily rep- ulght (Wedueudav), and it wouid ba apfaie cor- | The. supplomontal Wi axéopt the matter mhich 70,058 weat o tgshow that he, Goneral Election | seventation. | Dafendunta say that they Bave do taly to the coungel for tho complainauts if | occurred wibsoquent to ths filing of the original | coucision, he pofuted’ out ihe evile which would | Sho™ ejuc, v lorks wers® appalnted, or Pouco’ 1, conwiderat g of Lo cuse ina ebal, va, Abrabai Opp.u-taln} vendist 32,203 sed evory one of thie formidabls atray of ‘geutlemen | bill, they were ready to go oa, not deniritg to | reault frou the interforence of Judges with clections | worg suy pall I 'the Hocond, | Tauca's careful, donuilerato openiie o Wastiburoe, Ito!d hint that I bad po intentlon of [ 152688l ve. P 1550 Vh kppoar (o this Guty A thie TIIdnat AL | Hia s Rnmar, OF WOl e sraror bg tesons | By o labetions ; e 81acHoR oF yversone weutd bopit | Bevamny Velebve Shutn Elersnins Eigirecnts, of | fell dull aud foavy on tho Alsormanjo min. | recouiztoy Wastibnrne agaln, T naid that 1 bad | sodon for uew trld, dormon eliould bo liorrd to tho exclusion of the | sary, [Inl the supplemental Wil boon tho orlg- | 11 the hands of U -g;fllng.-ud not of tha Law ;" and it | Twentieth \un ) but los lpmn!(lurou’(urum(vlllh- Dating the short noou-hour, tho Hotel do Mabr | hrought the connterfeit 1 hiad protnised to obtalu, Seomm— 0! and holil cloung argumont for tho complainantd, 1f | jual bill, avery dlfforent question would have | had beeu d e, auch facts are trus, th Your 1lonor will only fis somo Lote at which o | arison 8 to the Jurisdiction” qf the Court ; but ar removed frou poli scross the way furmabod s fruly Gormas | hut Iiutcnded 0 gako it dlirect to 3ir, Wileon, whoin ELSEWHERE, g St [nfinciivs wid Bovar & wrlk s e \La %n::llmvum:f:fw‘;dszunln. Al.lnuluulun }{millfl | rep lollshn n:xln amml. and Dy 1 u';:lu‘c‘k n'-’.‘f;“"vfm"fi?“n‘é‘.’.mfi'n’.".‘.'.‘i'.’."'n,-.’i:‘,‘&“?n.:fl.‘fl’&'; THE MILWAUKER, SEXTINEL MfDLE, argumonts for the defendants whall eloso, we'do | tho quostion now muss rost wholty upon the | fuighk pr night not ieus b b the oMmelal rellirna of Ui slection, showtug s majorlly | all wero ready for the aftornoun wossion of the | 108 Wiisoa's fnner ofice just s X passed through the Spestat bisrateh o Tha Chicsaw 1rion not caro whother ono or l of them epeaks, Tattor contatued 1n- the origial bil, and upon | Ehbncaior, a b imsied forts 1o s chotoue of | (osicrporation of e e waris Gourt, Tho nows thuh.lu‘\.lgu ll‘!'lu\my \Iunld e e il pran, . JaxxsviLLE, Wis., May 5.—The muchi-talked- th --1& fiisther Mkt Al depearanco be an- | that - matior ‘thay naid lhed Court ~had | th “nmlfln.ln‘l- Houer ought nolfo lteus the ln- | would preveut the Yotes or baliots in such watde enst ;g;flu‘" o ;f'?\'.‘;“fiufffi;: ;x'c:m‘[’"‘s];':;’m?"{j; At last the door opcnel, and s, Wilton came 42 | of ault of A. E, Barpos va. the Ilon, Matt H, erad, I wounld liko aleo Lo say, iu rogard to this iction, sud i not sos | junction, The'iutervention of the Court by injunc~ | from belng legally counted; donl ihformation dinge 4 e N et et Boneeei o ¢ epiomontet AL s L oid Y e ton | Ho upeo i et otton | Ho wouid sy Aatruvato. snid iy sataskle: | 4k beof iyt Chalibgers wese Bot, admited do. 18 | Srawing Awsy uescly all of the lnterosted Afder- | foo Tt u cusue Cprpeutor for €2,500 comes up in tho Cironit at, even eu 10 salute him he sald: ¥ ¢ : Y ? Friday, Winany & Lennott af day ¢l renonted o the twents fuatead of reduciug them, 1v had wade uphis | yrosaut fn the voom with fhe judges of slsction | men. sutl, Leinuot bave auything to say to you, If you | Court bLsre on ¥ W | ]!u{pl‘l‘l‘e‘ é‘rfi:.'m&’!f; go!:ro ;m‘n ;nfioz“l:‘u %’m‘\::’f m%hfl"“““ this new zastiar {n the 8upple- | ning 1o adviss the layor and Gouscil to et waa progroseiog, snd u-i; :ucb Fight wes ; THR ACTION OF TIZ COURT hia¥e auytbiuy Lo yay 10 e it must be through Wash- Kelrlng for Barpeo. 1'urpoo fluml that, l\;‘l‘n s ved aluco tho fllng of ke original % NOT TUE PROPER WAT. IIERQISE O DOTRTIIL: FOMERS: demandod of tho. Judgcd on LeUalr of thie hersoi | in giving o elly's counel & bearing was dreated | Durus, who la lio head af tnat depurimenc This | ho was rovenue detective, be Iuteuted £,50) in deowed it important aud sbeolutely fmpera- | opposed o fhe adoptiow of the ik of bill, with & viow of seking an ipjuuciion | The Conrt—I do not undcratand tiat this is 5d b y 4 3 4 | favorably, nd Washburue, and dung out, saying that T would t gEsinay tho iy ju it orporate caraclty, Wien ey o auch tis abjoction wifch is mmade s | o fOF the sake of tha publlc Lutercat o so advise | bl snd luslata that, even 10 the BAe N e | COUTt-rools yedtendsy coutaiied room enough ',I‘u‘v, atuing o o wihaibr of e, 1 meverth, buy it back a¢ sur time. Thiu gtock Le haa Leld Bl I e prope o Corpouter refusing to tako It, atier that I thought 1 was Bpe thie i, § undepstsua the law ta ba that, it s bill can~ | g, tat the ofl 1 . Th D o to | for them all. ‘Tho headjuarters of tha entire ted Ue kind ofiives of u former high oficial | 6YOF 8iuce, P e T renaretiie L ‘Wi | vl subplomontss mster, and at he et time con | (AMEEHR 1t B2 8o W NSTE & itite' 1 | Mosihor oaly Dhe bt wa Mecd by 1he Judgesef el | Bumber, Mayor Colvin fucludud, was, thorefore, L Sevics B Sl e, va cand | Durpas b booo removed from (Lo allow at ble S T b o Tt rondy It 1t biad passad fromm | t4ins malter which ls propecly maltet of amendmenty | of §1,600,000, Let 1t be alegrayiied thaty afior dolil | tion in each of he wunda ia. dupute, puil | Judge Williima' Court, sud il ofiicial busiuoss | upon Bolicitor Wition duly, Theso effvita wero up. | solicitation. Burpeo thereupon susd to recaver Ty taind o the paciaont whou £ Jade (ho atatos | ,cut by Ferebed by demurrorcuot y s mouos, 18 | eraily aa Injunction of e Kud bad Veen grauted, | i immateelyl whoiner thee was oie ue more Vel | was for Cte Gina | wbamlonsd, fhe | swilaf wad L il igkhon, not biving tumed | ihe siavunt g, meut tliut thoro was o allogntion In It relutitg | 1o eaiv. T may iay In thlh conmection fiat (Fscatante | b iearuit OL L cly ollcers MaUL b | b s tntotmostons, or Lo an o wieiher i | OBYY face missed mad ihar of b | UV Jibsanuontlr arcosted’ i New York, Spesial Diapatch o The Chicago Triduns, uam:;l‘afce: u‘r;o'd“!‘a:'!no xf‘, rg:l‘a‘;':\afdl: worfi‘;{ i’fii,' (‘.}b"‘ufi'.‘.' {x;:n‘tflm:'l‘;: :. b u.l:nfll Il?:d uu'fl.'f soulil nok be carrled; aho would be bankrupt ia six | the vnm“;\hv l"’“‘“‘“"“ of w i §:‘,'3. Iy l:::e’;a eo‘l‘dle rL'i'h« Yl)z::rd :‘1'; l’o‘.lléfflr 3 where somo counterfoit monsy was fuund under Avtoy, I, Moy Ifi-‘-Tln coutested-clection Batlors; And T deratand now, (rom alrs Intive, | the Parties ot bavipg obiaioed leave to mske i | PSBUN 1o oo Your advice totaem was tust they flT.‘"wxl" PR Sl B iaute of ablio Works oontinusd. tuoir ole | Ly Ued Which e claiua way pis Uiera by s wau- | esse wL{es s ool o the courts of his couwaty 4 & niudiuisl, & ean coly fopn the sunblor | ahoyid ezerciay mo doutful pawer? 'Taupposs you | ware cast by s paune person tn favor ol tucorporating | cial duties unintorzupiodly until tha hours of [t ng:m::: of'a 3:':‘:““““"‘ KRGl | for e e e Trmin ae dotetidant, was decided BVttt anl coriioly ot sxerco | S410, R e o Nl e e L O el R e S by Judse Boydor, of this citcuit, to-dsr. The fd ad, \umlike tho proviois day, the | msds ms so angry that | dumned Loth tha Bolieltor | vliiwaukies Sentinel siook, Carpouter agresing to the that the only allekation of matier ocourrivg be- fore tho wyit was broukht is an_ aliogstion b re- b | 3 Ll alle = gard ton comparivap of yolos fnaeyoral of tle betier aivised, 10 tegard that Dl excopt | B COUId Mot bu ¢ comiaizer ey Deay wsbersy” Ui wlegts | o way :fl;fifimcml:w‘v.e;t:rd&lv‘cu;.’::::dv:; Fhatts WRARLIRG SAtisn, thiowing Is ' udge ‘Hoyders onior 1 this brim el pax;nm\ at tho Tast Htato an ln;t‘l,‘ulhllup[\lemnmll ‘matter utated in it goes, Judge Dickey—! llm:llmll{ that 210 or “any baliols wers de | o0 1y 8 o'clock Lib wout ab bis deak as You may think the word that of yory Ustlegon- | caves It (s order that the elsciion Congrosmonal * election * sud _tho voto | Judgo Lawreucon counoction with the slieyationt | {mesu to that po power e5cept auch se may be ted o the buxes of tue volugpiaccs of | WORWRE KYC DN o8 HEN ahatly fluds bim. | sequence. - in queation of Jobn G, irvin s rocent eloction, ~which ~we con- o oriiual bill 3 tor | Ugesasary fur ihie preseit proscrvaiion of 1B rights | e Twenllelh Wand which: were not cast by Yotery, | FRR6L B8 ) Bad ¢ ive )t you will Tead on, however, you will soon | County Judge of Sladison Cqunty sforcsaid, be . 8 % urclyed ¢ o ocs 5, 2 i ' ' 0 By i Gt 2 B ot e e | ferstand J?:',‘.‘:{. suy right to regurd [ ou bie mo- e Lamrone e bract it anw wittin botls | Yoey deey Sl b s and. framtuioat voiee, 1f | fuquieitive minds uadatoly wout to i to | ““Sou'will sos that fat s, which 1 usod In | clared slodied to taid ot af Couy Judns a8 supporta tho altogafion of the origiual bilh aud | niesie) Ul esrn ige . : O Bsrn s b pontiviass st | S p e e wsas warvan tava atClls SU0iton: |1 aigsuvas wbis iinpodlngsi was, 1t leaked-cut |, thanecond sliptey, Ta used au & noan. i 0, J. J. of ‘the act of 31374, aud Jeave the yigoof thureof to40m- $he 1ule tn well sctiled that, bafore auswer, facts | Mr, Ty 7 deairod tnia to complete the answers bub | not'mit a clond in thaly way of \neartning fraud, but | plalnents ; etated that they bad uo.knawiedge, Infor yostorday. Vory sbortly afser tho City Clork's |~ And wa mil usy still further thst that that that | pio O upty, and the fHon. John 3. Ualer were d h: o Solvi g kon of laxs in the shind yentenco, is | for plaiutiff, and O, P, Wiso sud John @G. Irwin gcourring bofgrp the flling ' of & bill, as well au | The "0k wos. suy hecoueily (oF Bing an | 4ok wunt 10y Lade (150 s0. Lokt § FeS0Ch B3vFC8 | Biation, O Lelel 88 10 whosler i s Becood Ward tg | Olio onoued "that maruiog, Alavar Golriu | has "boen pokoa o o A A ot vars et ibous ocursi wise, may o gl by supe | “Aaed ke ol e porL b brmiled | 4 Sl iy R e | S eV Do o | s Ked it the oo aad aquized 08 e ol | a0 8 BOSSL o entauce aut one time to | 1 soutsted on- polient e el 1 perecaal v i : eounting lee [mmediately, carrie. . -y ds, b : Judge Dickey—I Hon i the original bill which they desired to treverse, from {hs place of vollugto s | ouus, oF did suy TUK TERMS OF CITY OFFICERS tlutun 1o p aud a frisud afterward ro- | grounds. Domall Cof the oty ayg Sytered a motlon I | but dia not state what & waa. 4 B e Yoo o oL T iEEve yrout | which was pansed by tho cottiol Mowday eyen- | marked, "1 fhat that, thas goublemsn JLTTDICT FOR MORTON. | o ohh atnke the suprlewental billa from tho tiles, and ¥ AT ned, any remsdy it ahould be | therwof to ¥ complunants, They —deny (S | ing. Thig was produced, and tho Mayor y‘o. paryed, was pasod sncorregtly. o nnsrqxh. (m“';I y ;'ymn by Lo ‘dmu(x'l[sn_ sk u.;fl‘.wm. THE ARCUMENTS. rovorted to, aud uch § elsnvery proccsding, The | arel) e @ allagation that - ke returua | S R raval on tho bask of it “Tho ' iret ' gentloman retoried “T againat the Oty ,I;u; "fi:fln (hap ...,fi,’.';,fi‘,’,:‘:l Sllowad o point MR, PENCK Goutt was ot compelent o puse spo tholleged | oF Ahe | clection | wers | hured | UEOR %y | 1n tho mast o provad of bod hands. Wieked | thas that that that goutloman pataod,’ wi tora of tho eslato of Arntzong & g o re- it} (ba v 1on 0 o shatsupplomental Llle o i, G205t 11O | 414n rovumed hiy srgument on she mottops for | fEuBLe LADE B0 batisiion, e e e | G teer 55 hvesiite. thw egeity of | touguoy uay At lie. did ‘this bocauss Lo was | @ ¢l uusy sentauCo: caver foF the logu of thieir stack sad unexpire udge Lawrence ov . (A, 4 That * . by their bullding beiug “blown up durin ly misapprebionds the | oxtending tho oid iujuuction aud the graujiug | rawedy, showing from it that auy voler could contest | sald votes, and werw only to {g:a:;x“n ol kl:xl::::'gl .t‘l:; m::ug;: -‘.’.'m‘.??oifi‘.‘é:’”d’f.‘.’i’fi'i mfi;"flf.’.‘u“.f S ‘-:hl“ m{::fl-td tg::, :\m:fi:& that, :::?':-rf:: oA £l lding e rid Soreadioy of s bill, for it does make very gravo chargos tbat | of the now one. .He sald jthad bean shown thag | the eliction lu tbe Camaly Court wpon ilng » peition | duty in doclaring sud rec " beou docided in favop of tie X ware got contaiad tn (e orlginal il tho Connoll bnd diyregardad & pact Gf the in- | oawsnt! Se A hiy dooes” Misciton Mo soreret | hek fos Law. they dedy Lhgs adrinod s the vpite 14 | into theic' sirondy wagliosded bost, bus thare | | A lady brosect veRtari e SSRRRiCE | TRk fames, ba béow deculed in (avey of Chy Mr. Tuioy~If the Court pleass, I 98 89 | unction only—tbst in reference to canvassio T oviug LLbs's sourt of o paucery Led mo | eaiody. sate b o cours. of pquity, snd fuaiet that | 99908 0 b 10 doube but what ho mesly ol | | L0 (0 ¢ “way 'n correct grammatical seps | Svarvarsip, Muss, Say Gi—The: Pbel ag—s i Al | g vhre Wiy Siatile BIOVILd §aother rorme | Thelr Fomody s somplote, foll sad sdoquate st Luw | b0 putbls onicial wiguature oo tho ahioh o 9 | {00 Dowles libel case wuwwlnjod, wikhy'n wi= ¥ LET THN COURT SPRAX. tho vote. AB to the remainder of thy ondor re- | {oisdietied ! 45 ‘guniher s Unides the Eh1d 4ct | regan 1o e lacororation of | Couvell in devlaring the vole. Hence to | teheot = o e e ettt il Gouri—Let me piate tny reasoas, thea X | atrelulog s, Jb hiad bab been disaberedy 4 | ° e axt relersvd 10 Lhe Fuck Wiah o Quastiad of t4a | wisos buid villagad, 400 10 Tagace 10 sgeilonh Magor s in squtamgd of Court, g “