Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, April 6, 1875, Page 2

THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE: TUESDAY, APRIL (i,. 1875 I8 27 an, ear: No. 111 ‘Throop arn Improvement: ek AT FOTTIER, fackeos rom [ e LN NT-TWO-STONY AT BAB arar Twenty-nint Clark-s AD & CO §i0 RENT-A SPLENDID l‘?\nmu of llmr;i‘llrmlml 1at, = Miabigan-av. hnu lonth Water. IRKGSTORY Al 13 Tioabat. - Apply Yod. T. RYKNBO ‘lvu RENT4S basement, @ house on var, ]'5 RENT— ‘mient houe !l\) Wabash.av, Lnd"mnfl i b lw'n —iTaise b ¥ tarnishod, Aashington.u Neat Madison st 16 BERT well-uen ingravemont nSouth Olinto Ty umago, watet-olototy w ary 0 RENTZ1OUSE: ont parts of the city TK| Totiee RLLIS-AV, Ellis-n: ath o Ty to MON aoME ORFORSAL A 3 raicieav.) €X ‘rooms each,. with sll 0 mo | i ol ind finlslica o th of Thicty-n st Approve .oty alao & similar ana o o neac lako shora, Fo e m, ele, V! ot; all modorn conveninnces. RY' & WATERMAN, N L ,_2STORY Al atiyor moathe " Juquire &t barement doar. ND COTTAOES 137 3 WSO TATOMPBON, OF 3 VRARS, THE I, , 0 14 Parkav., with all medern i good order. Appiy 6 G, K5, LOLMES, WO.BTORY o-mars R Basor Anconuonav.. £ SE_AND TURNITUTE FOR BALE A‘“ m‘;’“a“""l”“&:fimflu glven for o raln. e {not $80 per lI!ll.fl'l!!.. A.Drnll at the louso, E37 , and fs crmplete. ash. Wost 0 FIRST-CLARS BRIGK f10USES FXIL"S‘“W and gaa xtures. 110 ROWN RTONK FHONTS Jradern imp style, an Wabasliay it KRS ., Stoom 13, (7 Y 4 T GO 3 oy basemont o ront ‘coruor hou Toravamm 13" Raudglph i EN F-LARGE O REN F-LARGE ment brick, 4 doo ey ot pecol T-ONE2 taining ten roo 9 Hurlbn i 0 per 1no: Tnquiro af AR LINCOL: g ok, and brick bara, abind ) futhe’ vict Tnanir tn th NRW Washlagtuu- y of s roar. ATROLT-AV. AND PARK, A NEW TVO. 10 rooros, all modern CcuANLES N, HALE, Rrrot, dncoln Park; re 'IT(T HENT- 1457 ‘bascisical coLtage, e N0, 118 U ‘water anil tonrooms, 4 53, Tribuna ofth NORTIL DEARTO omoni marblo froat. 7 ROGTH DEATOIORNA] niv, louse of 1 "Alao, 471 Went Lake-st., Kix choip ta'good touaate.” 5, BYON rent AV, CONTATHIN il por month, U ruums and REN , nostheas OUNG, m 0 R FA g thowlip witn ratleman aus i to & party will [\o’ NGS, 1120, 115 brick house And eottal %o _MEAIS & CO., 100 W i Fuos) ’rfimw—zvsflmfim- F L aweliing, 16 roome, bathi-suome, water ToU 0, Dariboast Goruce Madison and Ladialia ro or o TN iE o0 jargo hauno wish to acrange wi' 110 to tako the hauso and board i (au= unaxcoptloushio rafornnces Lnnrcarant’ would ba ‘mado. Tigo. Snb RENT—IN WELLIN slsth-pt., neat cornor Bow S-atory houees, 6 roomns and collars, m water, ront $350 kand Klxte ;I;o ENT- AT MAYW GGo! ote, '0RORUE B: KIMDALL, Maywood e i Boft B DUFER, Clar iburh 5 5 MIGHIGAN-AY ‘est Bl 10U It 25 |}ll!nn-ll s 1 MAY 1, B ams_and nn. LON-PLACE, ON FORTY. 1 Wopdl i 3 doi house, Pralsl D ail inodern - Deacboramt. NT T RRICK loset, oto., D19 JAM DASEN “Abordcon, OUTIRRN PART A a_lNberal ‘Address AL 8, Tribuno nwood, lo toantel por 4 inwn-a nth- oAt LAKE, 8 La: Yan Buron-at. NT-FARM-HOUSE, Seitly 20 acres Iand 1 Wostern 162 1%., 15 miles from clty, “Apply ro b i1k 4 Dakentdn Bodlding, [0 RENT—AT NYDH T rdopot, ULIICH MENTT WILL RENT o7 Tosifonc ot Laka Yoraut, faraisbod.” D. . TO RENT-ROOMS. MO RENT-BUITKS OF 2 Okt 6 ROOME, AT 17 T o Inqulro of Janitor . bullding, or at 164 Fifth-av,, up-staies, PARK-S GOOD HOUSER & .4 ORCHAR rings, an C., 110 w10 10 11't0 i 7 Dearborncat___ 'OR THE SUMMER Thi aud pleay cheap.. KNT_UPPER ALF OF HOURE GORNER OF rtg-recond aud 1ndiADa.Av., 1ivo rooms; wator ot clothos-psosses. To 8 good temant vary Tci’nk:fl’ NEW AND FLI ‘rvoms, 1 <l A ANDSOMELY FURNITED 0 RENT- oot TosTioa i oo oty a5 Ioweat Tanta, Giaricat,, Tloom’8. 110 R damust, i roma, fina looatloa. Room b A 153 Lasatlaat., GANTLY FURNWSIED up. TOOMA, 1L Bouth TIlE LOWERL PART OF 1@ WEST MEAD & COF, ERT_NICKLY T SHED FRONT ROOMS, ) ERia Ton Baeiiomen At dadics, moar Orank baciis i, ‘Trasiohts taken. Tu WENT—FURNISHRD 100 To, foval, No, 10 8hurmia. ok, ur month, ifoaattable for gentlem: bt 70 South B WY THIE DAY, U atY Oibte, Wvss Tu ENT-31] WEST ADANS: GROUND FLOOR Sentory callay of atlys ftores. - 0 RENT-FOR STORAGE OR MANUFACTURING A wioso 18104 feat, connuoted Witk & two: 38554, with_elovator, and Lasomant 393, with stabloroom for 4 horsox, and drive, on Fifthav., jost south of EROE, Roal L purposes-. Mory warelinuse wayfnta basowment, o o 1o BeCopiabl Wb S o Adums or Jo'sia STORES, OFFICES, &o. in the rear, 3l i iminedi. O R, Bl Kitsto and Noto Wast Madisoneat. O RENT-ATORES2XT0 18 THOMPEONS BLOGK O T Soarites by Wik . THOMPAGN, 1 TP0_RENT-TWO STORES, adjolnlng the Wel Haat. Dopot. W AND 8 EABT KIN- g RENT_STORRS 955, 957, AND 539 HALSTED. rrisun-st., possession of fately, 257 and 250 Sav 1. Alsu, t rout immediatelf, T corner atore, [ tmme: Targo basamont. an e 1 Elavicat, 1 KRELER, | northwast corner Apply todJ. 1 o7 duadhion sbe Lagall A FINE BTONK 4 av,, and Van liaros.at. tato nd Madironuts., oo ar elatling, Vo Huromcats, | 18 8 UITABLI ‘atsauthwest coruor of Halited '« YOUNG, nothsast curner %0, CORNEKR W ghoep. J. £ 01 ATLE rITu RENT—TIE _NIEW AND ELEGANT STOUE, No, 10 Lake-it., b it fron shuiters o gaod t,_BAMU. Townzs'r_'flm_] YOUT chfganar., with i, utween 1t ronr apruinge, Rent fow L QRIIR, 2. O arnor of Ha Sault, and elavator; ront NEAD & GO, 165 Labal Clark and [ Balloats., o % 10 Tahune Bullding. WABEMENT \v.um{A and uw to Y AND aih 0. & JAUKSON-BT, x:mmgr enalits wad Gouigos: cau Eaprass Bulldiug, vory nulshed thoss ban (for busin ence, and wosk parfect 1ag bias & passenqor a: rou, o omaly o s fiems g s Brory aiers conren iy}, bava overy moders canvents Jobt porioct pratsction skainay firar tho bund: i rvigie o "ApDI¥ 104, N Oy aTrvte also oo 0 blook. Ofiloos. 0 RENT-SPAGIOUS OFFI By W, i, THOMPSON, 29 ORS IN THE AMRRI- low to first- 13 heated i honnsh FIGMPION. HEOOK, 3Gt 0 roome for outa: clorat u 1% X 0 n byilding 13 Nendilpht, troplag To RENT-OVFICES IN OITY TONAL THoiidiog, 15 and 166 Washingtonat.; & firstcla sator willaoou be la; rontlow. Balle-st, elo & COK, 105 La. G, X NT-OFFIORS AN 1A I ;lgu(mil TN BUILDING 1LTON, Hoom 0 FEN TR Gy o Teust Cu (llagik and Aldhon. ply at Unloa Trast Company, Miscelianoons. ENT-DOUK-SITUATED NEAR SOUTIC aord. TOu, Applyto G, 1110 RtE BURKN. 0 RENT17 VAN DURENKT, ing, or at 118 Filtha z00d —THE COR ., \OL RN, NEIL ROD! mpany Bulldle "+ alan, rouis on tluore above, vecupled by Adams & 5 outh Oithion-ate _ ) FI.OOTL st cornor A 1, Rorthina o thocityjw Il runt low 1600 b 17 Dan KON ROUTIl DBRA . bridio: 150 fost frout. Apply at’Otfica I3 it TFNT- T SIOST G best toroom famlly Hotels i by bt b "‘&."'«"fi Danr. A 0 MCURAN, WITi1 ™ SIDIKTRACK, ‘Avply st Oitios 13 Cham* NEAIL VENTHNTLY 'rl\o JRENT--DOCK-150 FRET RIVEI FRONT, NEAR T a- ridied racl itz "ADLIP 10 JAMES EARILE, hore-t. ‘Wenly:av00n: — ERACIIONAL QUARENQY: $5.00 Packages oF - FRACTIONAL CURRENOCY IN EXCHANGE FOR ‘rallros Bl of National Cavency, AT TRIBUNE OFFICE. . <1 / BEECHER. Denial and Contradiction His Strong Points, He Disputes No "End of the Plaintiff's Allegations. Showing Tilton and Moultotf to Bo & Trecious Pai of Liars. Somo of Their Monstrous Fals T thoods, a8 Boecher Calls Them, rious Explanation of the Hetter of Contrition, Ho Neither Composed Nor Dic- tated It, but Might Havoe Done So, His Apology to Tilton, and Ilow It Was Reeelveds Vague References to Bowen’s Charges Against Beecher. Mother-in-Law Morse's Share Troubles. While Beecheor Testifies, M Stares at Him, Extra Large Attendan male Speetators, Rumors and Speculations OBSERVATIONS, THE DEFENDANT, 14 MANNER YESTENDAY. in the oulton Fe. « Sneclal Disvatch to The Chicaao Tribune. Brookryy; N. Y., April 5,—Sharply at 11 Olerk Mallison callod the jury, and then dressed as on provlous occsslons, stro Beccler, do to the cliair, IIolins grown sccustomod to it, and to- day a bright, Liealthy glow suffuged his*cheels, and coolaess and deliboration marked b! s spoceb, which bavo pot been apparent hitherto. The sang froid soon dieappenred, and ko becamo pos- sionately flusnt, thougu in rapidity of specch ho was ovon more dignified than nsual, Whon do- seribing the Interviows with Moulton, be smoto ils thigh vigorously, aud spoke in tonoes so fer- yent and-earnost that he held tho audieuco apeli- bound. It wes duriog the vivid tion of Moulton's iuterview with deserip- Henry C. Bowen that Beechor ehowed the most cemotlou, his voice quivering, and his eyes boing filled with toars, Ono of the most notabls ele- ments of the procecdings was tha pes ralatency with which Moulton locked into Beecher's oyes duriog the rocital of the several i THE ATTENDANCE. ‘Thers was the greateas attandance to- hias Bo far beleagured tho doors of torviows. -day that the City Court,—iu foct, it has reachied tho dlmen- #lons of a moab. 1sdies, the cxtremity of tho fashlon, Thore rows of chairs, and in each row five ch filled with various dogross of lovoliness, Especially numerous wero the most of whom wora drossed fu were five nirs wero Ouno young Isdy was clearly a walf from Mur- ray Hill. Her raiment jewelry rar, and hor tont remarkably -patrician. Others there shawls of camel's halr and sparkling monds, Thoy eat in roligious rapture was costly, ennombife her wero in with dla- throfigh all the proceedings, and moved the sympathy of the counter sox. Mss, Beechor, hor daughter, Mra. Bcovill, a largo stout yoong woman of 83, and threo #ons, all sat in a buach, talk and listening a great deul. Caldwell an Ing littlo d Murray had plenty of buelness providing camp-atools for members of Ilymouth Church, who wors full & hundred etrong without tha narrow confluos of tho Court. A largoe reprosentation of the nows- paper presa \ag auotber feature of tho day. —_——— TESTIMOXNY IN DETAIL, THE'ATTENDANCE, TUE LARGEST CROWD YET. New Yonxk, April 5.—The beautiful this moroing, the fact that Monday iu weathor an idlo day with many, and many more esnuot work, woro thoy willing, becauss of the duilne sonaon, together with tho knowledgo 88 of tho that Mr, Beochor would continue his testimony iu tho groat scandal trisl, combinod to attrace to the Drooklyn City Court-room to-day perbaps tho largest orowd yot gatherod thero &l inco tho causo of Theodore Tilton agaiunt the Itev. Hen- ry Ward Boecher was brought to irlal. In the court-room, every spot whereon s Ay ditor could find a resting-place was occupied, @'ho women, too, were more numerous any provious day than on Aftor tho court-room waa thus full, outelde & great throng remained; many having tickota of admissjon, which wore, for the time, useless, Judge Neilson waa prompt {o Lis attendauce, and besido Lim on the Bonch were David Dudley Fiold and Judge Reyuolds, As soon ss tho Clerk had made the naual proc- lamation opening the Court, Judge Nollson sdmontsliod the audionco agalnat nuy outbroaks of applause, and while #o doing 3r. Beechor re- sumed his place on tho witnesu-stand. ——— THE LETTER OF CONTRITION. Tak STOLIES ADOUT TILTON, Mr, Eyarta~Recurring, now, Mr, Deschor, to tho econe of the interview at your house, in the study, of dato of that memorandum in your land, Inow ask you, when Moulton mado the tor’s innocence In respect of tho matl rogard to your belief ou the subjoct to musu whother Moulton's statemon wy mind in regard to Tilton ? Q.—What was the effect of that uj mind in that rogerd? A.—Why, ostly sud cause It made mio, {0 soms aense, an {njurer inmoceuce, Louid 1 anY seiwe your coupoultion THE LETTER * 'The follawing in the docuent roferred to (1n trust with P, D, Moultou,| statement which you have given regarding Tit- tors that have been imputed to Lis morality,—etorics that have been told,—what offect did theso wtate- ments of Moulton's produce upon your mind in of thoso moralitles 7 A.—Do T undorstand tho question b cloarod pon your I earne over-gladly bolieved that his ststomont about Br, Tilton waa the fruth about bim, sud I felt all tho watre for belloving it, bo- of Tiltou's y 8T, 49 m-lp-wrvhllrb ‘uuhald W your 131y Dran Farenp B W (Bsoughs you heddora Tihoms. fore ‘z:‘:'zurn, Judt T Butabls myself befors hiw a8 1 do b fore sy Gud, e would have besis & better mau o drdutiatances than T havo bocu, I cau vk nothin e will romneiibar il other brossta 16a) would sche, 1 will not plead for inyself, that § were dead, But uthers muat"live to will A“ Lefore any oue Lut Le foMipsted. All Loveu wuh sufter, 1 myself ahall thoughits are ruuuing out toward my friends, sod toward thu poor cbild Jy- lug there and proylug with ber folded hands, trausgresaion of itious, siuncd ugatust, bearing the Sioler, "Het forgivencua T havy, 1 huw Hhe 13 W pey to G0d to put it In the heart of hier husband to forgive me, T liava trusted this to Moulton fu confidencs, | (8lgued) o Jxny WARD HERCUIR. ’“ 3 AN OTIECTION, X r, Fullertan—0ljceted to, e aer 1+ & taomorandtim madle by Mouiton an testified. uidge Netion—1 (hiuk you ran take that. Mr. Frllerton—\Whethet this fn or not, that will ap- eie from facts he has airendy detailed, Tt fa uot hin foprevatl ou the subject, 1t fa tho ury. 3 1 e yon may take it hether in auy senss that paper i Nellson—Yea, ¥ Mr. Heecher—In nasousa whateyer {a it any com- porition of mino, Q.—1s ltacopy or production of any dictation of yourn? A,~In uo proper scuso of the word dictation iha T dictate ib, HR WOULD NUMBLE HINBELY BEFONE TILTON, Q.—T ank your attention now to the first clausc of that memorandutn, which reads thus: ¢ [ ask through you Throdore Tiltin's forgivencen, and 1 huhle my- self beforo him 24 1 do hefore my God.” Did you ez« yiress thiat ecntence fn those words oF thelr euivalent o bloulton that Bight7 .~ uld nof, Tdid say that invisw of tho statements made, 1 felt that 1 had wronged litm, bad wronged bis’ house, and that [ Liad hittobled 'mysclf befors God for it, and T was wili- {ng to humble myself before Theadots Tiltou, TILTON WOULD HAVE REEN A NETTER MAN. Q.—~Thin claure,—~iin wouhl havo leen a beder mar lu my efretnitances than 1 hiave een,"—tid you e3poRs that eluro 1 those worie, oF st equivalent to that mesning or oxpreion? AT did, subslan- taliy, nnd that & good any timen over, —Tu what conversntion, on what tople, did you ke that apcech 7 1u ‘retercnce to thal, X had mysell ab (o firat blusly skded sgainat Tillon with Bowen: whiereas, when I wes fa troublo and difticnl- ty, Tilfon had almont fustantly and with geuerous {iontaueity dropyel everytaing wid gone to my lelp; bit, whea ho was i troubie, 1 had gone againat hir, Qu—Wan (hat your feeling na to appearing to bavo ncteid thus toward him? A1 vemeniber it very dis tinctly, 1 shoutid not forgel It to tho judgment dsy, ,—DId you express in theo words what l? poars as 117 clause in the memorandum: * I ask nothing ex- cept that i will remember il the othier, Learts (bat swoitld achio "7 A—Xo, air, I did not make suy state- ment_ which {s oxpressod Ly that -formula, T did in that convorsation repel the 1dea that T was acting elf- ishiy, and I called up in various forma aud at differ- ent tlimen in converantion tho relationn whicl were sue- tatned to other persous fn my houseliold ud bis houacliold, and to friends n the church who loved mo as If I belonged to thotr houscholds, A TOOR INTERPIETATION. Q.—DId son express in thero worde, or in their equivalent, This clause of thn memoranduns ¢ ¥ Lam ol plesdifig for mygelf. 1 cron wich tBat 1 wero duad but others miuat livo snd suffer"? A.—Ob, {hint {« not my phirascology, It 18 & very palo, pour, feelils futerprotation of tho infenalty with” which X ex: pressod my sorrow and iy griel b the sorrow of other people, diid you oxpress, carrying the idea that welf Lt for others wers you concorned 7 A.—T dou't quito understand your question, . —~\What cansou stato as ‘having becn waid by yor conveying tho idea, not what you would suffer, Lut wwlint others would suffer? A1t should bo_remom- Uered that I was not in o logieal mood, and T did not meanra my word nor finish all my sedtences, and T am afraid 1 mixed up my metaphors, Thers was no iutnslty that I was capable of that Tdid ot feel, Somtimea it was laceration of my own beart at whai it poemed 10 mo I bad done towards Thoodore, Home times §t was tho iutense feclluge I hnd of what my preseuco in the hourchold had dune to-, wards_ Eilzabolh, Sometimen {t was indignation that Eilzabeth had dona what sho*had townrd me. Therowas juat fhst osclilition and vibration whict taken placo {n n highly excited ststo of mind. 1£ T bl exprossed fndignation 1 was sorry for it, and the nust mood went peshapa 10 #ho other oxtrome in excusatory stateruents, ME UAD DACAEL DIE, Q.—Did you express this elawso: % 1will dia beforo anybody but myself shall bo fnculpated,” {n thoso wordn, or any cquivalent expression? A—Well, no anch phrase s that. 1 bava looked througls thle, and T do ot think Ises 8 phrary fn it that Is miue, und yet L thfuk T eco sotirces from which o good miany of ihém arodrawn, 1did say thst in a certain,—I can- not rocollect b certainly und - definitély,—tut that I did oxpress toysoif very strongly that T had ratber die thau to bisve Lroight stick trouble, or to have Increased such trouble; fhiat 80 far as T myselfaloue was ccncernod I counted 1ifo very small if 1 cutild mako reparation ; but It was not_anythiug prac- tieal snd definite, 18 wasa strong oxprowsion of thn .murging feeling of regret or romorao at tho mischief ‘thut seemed to havo been commmitted by me. POOR CIIED WITI! HER FOLDED HANDS, Q,—1 ask your attention to the next sentcucs that apjears ou the memorandum : “ All my thonghts aro rurning toward my friends, toward ihe poor child Iying thiore and praying with Lier folded hands” A— Yen, « 'Q.—Dil yort express what,is there? A.—Very likely, or the substance, Ouly this i a very poor expresaton, very mesgre. Q.—\What dlid you say, s in what connection? A, =1 don't know exactly what, 1 know I felt lke father that was standiug over the dead body of his clifld, T remember her, It wanlike death when Ieaw her, Blio bad been a dear child snd friend to me. 1 scomed to havo destroyed Ler reason OF moral rense, end porlivya ber life) for she was hovering oo the edgs of 1ifo and death, and I spoke, as onn would speak, feom the futensity of my distren, g SLLF18N CONSIDERATIONS. O —During this conversation, wera there any suycations made by Boulton {n regard to your feeling for others, and mot belng ex~ Clusively concorned about your own condition, A~lle reasoned on the might beforo the isiat, on the ground whers I refused, In_ seif-defeuve, to fivo up ine retraction. He {hought that scifish tion would be mean, and, bo very likely, alko, &t Eome point of tha conversation, nisy linve dealt with me fir the same way on Bunday afibrnoon, but I don’t now recall distinclly ony passago of that Lind, Ithink itis very likely, BILE I8 QUILTLESS, Q.—DId you use thess words, or thelr equivalent, contatned in the pext clausoof tlie momorandim : “Bheis guiltless, einned ogainat, bearing tho trans- rcaslons of anotier 7 A,—Vory itkely ; vory likely; ut 1 had lived in thelr houso a life of inthnato friendship for many years, snd if I had nifenated hor nfoctions ~in such degree aud manner as that It brought discord and wuich distress na oven had paralyzed her moral seuso, or rather ber reason 3 4f 1 had been ‘the occaslon of that mischief, I sald to mysolf, * Low could any man standand ree this trouble 7" . Mr, Deach—That s & matter of reasoning, One mo- inent, Mr, Beechier, Boecher—Well, I won't reason, Q.—Thejulame'of that you took yonracl?? A.—T took the blame to myseif, snd I continited to take it to my- gelf uatil the year 1574, “'MER FOROIVENESS I IIAVE." Q.—This furthier ;clause—3Ir, Beecher, are thess your words or the sxpresslon of what yot stated in sub- #tance : ¥ Her forgiveucss 1 have, humbly pray to God that 1le may put it into the Leart of ber bus. band fo forgivo mo" A.~No, sir; that must go with all ho rest, It , not of imy parentage, ThE question came up of Tiltan's fesl. ing—thie severity of feollng® The drift of the jnter- view waa such astaternent on_my part, or Auch au ex-~ hibition of my mood and purposes, a¢ should lay the foundation for » kind 'intorferonco between us and o teconciliation, and Tilton’s feelings, tha strength of thom, was gratificd when 1 had shiown what my real feeling wav, 1t led Lo conversations in reupoct to tho feeling il ronnd, 'Q.—Betwoen you and Moulton on that oceaslon T A.~Yew, elr, ou that occaslon, and it was in connec- tion with Elizaboth Tilton thet Isaid in many to- atauces sad urcncd forms that I felt that I had dona her on incalculsble wrong, but tiat I had uo doubt whatever of her formveness, But it was Tilton' whose kindness and reconciliation I very mtich doubted, 1ite next friend, Moulton, was talk. g 40 sie, ik ho wia asuring mie, too, that (o din. culty with Tilton was that he hsd it firmly Bxed in his miud that I was his m enemy, and had been, and he himeell waa satisfied that Lf he could see how Ial feol, a8 be beltevod € felt, that & would work a very diffel te of fecling in Tilton, Qi~—That ir, if Tilton could seo as ho (Moultan) saw 17 A—Yos,sir, (3, Evarta called for exhibit, Q.1 call your’ sttention, Ar, Beoclier, to & phrase in your leiter of June i, 1A7J, which is ex- bibit No, 26—the phrate, '*Ths sgreemient was imads aftcr my letter through you was writlen.” L call your sitoution to that phrase in that cxpression, Wore you referring o this memoranda on thia occasion of the Sundsy on which the miemorandum had besn made? A~—Iauppose I bad referenca to this samo memorandum which I bad just bad in my hands, Q.—Liud you secn It on Bundsy in sny form ¥ Ay 1 tver saw it till T waw [t thon, Q.—1 will rectir nowfor s moment, Mr, Beecher, to our Interviow with Tilton on the 3th of December, Vetare. (he closo of the Gase, Did you, in that inter: viow, use suy expression, or mage suy reference of any kind on the subjoct of Dinte's Inferno? AwI rocollect uow; it did not agree— Mr, Bosch—1 objuct 0 wilness proceeding to argu. ment, e Mr, Evaris—Wall, dld you say it ou that occaslon? A.~1 should say T did not, NO MEXTION OF THE CHIME OF ADULTERY. Q.—Durlng the whole intervicw between Tiiton snd yoliruelf, lr, Liceclie, thal you have given your nar. Fative of, and Lo bis, digl Tilton in any fori acouse you of ths crimeof adultory With Lis wife? A—Most certainly be di not, B 'Dld o by way of recital or otherwise sy to you, orintimate {oyou, that bis wite hiasd ever accused you to hifm of adullery’? A,—Ifodid not, Q.—Was there at any time during that conversation rulsed between you, on bla urtor e your parl, the question whelbier you bad commltted sdultery'with bis wife? ~A—Tifdre was ua such quostion,—no such aliusion,—no sach toplo, by futimation 'or by ez ‘pressed langusge, or in any misuner whatsoover, Q.—Was thero oy statoment by him of eliter | verbal o written accusations or of {mputations against | you by hiv wifs sxcept the memoranduin read to you of improper wolicitations 7 A,—Nothing but that. Q.—Was there durlug that conversation. any refer- ence Lo, rucital, or suggoation, or arguments by which you hiad gyercome hier virtue' and trampled over Ler Caatity?” A~No, sir; uo, slrj no —— THE APOLOGY, . MOULTON'S NEW-YEAR'W VISIT, Q.—T como now, Mr, Doochur, {0 the 24 of January, low was that—bow wes that ob- sorved—that day? A.—According to the oustom of years past in my congregation, as in othors, 3y loute was open to recelve calls on that day from 10 o'clock until 7. 4 Q.—~Now have you any recollection of any in- terview with Moulton on tiat day? A.—-Ouly the most vhadowy impression that he had called upon 10 as a caller, Q.—Dut as to tha conferonce or to the intere view with bim, what recollection have you on 4hot subject 7 A,—Thero was no conference or Iinterview, Thero couldn’t Lave boon any con- forence of any msgoltude. There was nons, ug, Q.~DId you go nup stsirs from your parlors into your study with Moulton? No, sir; I did not. p Q.—Was thoraon that uay any conversation botwoen you in which you asked Monlton if ho thought it woull ba safo to have tha sale of Plymont pevs to go on? A.—No, sir nothing of - the _ kind. It 'wonl Lavo asn slmpl Iava tiolliing to do_with ly sbanrd, I :he.nle of Plymouth pews, Tast belongato the Truse cat, Q.=~WWas thers any discussion between you and him on'that day in tegard Lo any lotter that” Tilton was writlug or was towrite to Vowen? ~A,—~No, airj no Q.~Now, ihs following day, was there any fnterview retween you and Moulton the 34 of July, or {licto abotita 1" A—Vea, ir ; thero was, or thereabouts, Q.~When did tiat oceur? ~ Ai—At Mr. Mouiton's houve. 1 was in bed, 1 thluk, from sickness, though he waa somatimes in bed from late bourw, 1 uover ssw Lim 100t to recolvs a call from tne. Whilo I was there, Tilton cama fu, 1 had not had any lutercouras wlth Bt sinco Dec, 50, 'Fliere was 1o salutation bo- tween ur, Moulton began by raferring to the conver. sution pasniug between him and we, and. was procecd. fug to tell Tilton something I wald to him, when [ struck in, 1 had boen talllug Mou.ton of “Tilton and hin liard Dosition and circumistances, It was not a prolouged eouvoraation, ATOIQ01ZES TO TILTON, Q.—Now, afier Tilton came, how did Moulton open the conversation—after Tilton camo 7 A.—It was, o genersl. tht 1 had Leon saying very kird things of “Tilton, * Tilon was _ diriat _and - Rloomy (i Dbis mspeot, T turned toward Tilton and, with far more words than [ am uaing,—I epitomize aud Mato thosubatance,—1 turned to Tilton and wpoke lo Lilm of the profunnd regrot I hind that 1had sn any yray beena party or summidisry fo tho_ injurics in- Aicted upon bim by Bowen, zud 1 also said that the disturbance in s houscliold, which bad been oo- casioned by mo, was without fntention and withont my recogmition’ at the time, but that I did regard it 10w 3 Leing very ssrious, and that 1 had imost pro- found sorrow:for the disturbance I had occasloned § thia rupturo betwesn him umd bis family, and gho miserics he must have suffezed, and thot "1 anked s ardou for the oria and for the vthor; that £ felt that I ml been in tho wrong, and tuat 1 ought to ask for- givenens forit, Q.~Did you say anything asfo what you could do and would wivh to do in respect to —4— A.—1 said any- thing that Iaid in 1y power conalstent with truth and Bonor 1 would he more than glad to do to repair the mischiof, sud Moulton, with great cmphasis, satd to Wim: *‘Theodore, that'1s sn spology which any gens tlerakn can offer to fauothier ; that 1s, with self-resject can otfer to another, and that is an apology which any gutlewman ought to respect, TILION AND DEECUED AIOOK JIANDS. Q.—How did he {ndicats that? A.—We—we shook Lauds, Q.—Was that tho last of tho fulorviow? A.~Thers wa4 a little more, and Tilton witbdrow, I thisk—ono of us withidrew, Q.—At this interview, Mr, Beecher, was any refor. enco mada by ofther of you (o chargus or accisations made Ly Mrs, Tilton? N, Buach—What's that question 7 Evarts—Any referencn mado by either of them to the charges or accueatiotia mude Uy Mk, Tillon 7 Witneas—I dou't thivk thero wero, I dou't recall any. Ithink we wers talking of {lis mutter in jtu whole, snd didn't go fnto parilenlars, Q.—Now, after ‘Llltou left, Mr, Jeccher, 2was thers anyibiug botweanyou and boulton? A.~Thoro was, Itiink, I don't rocall snztling that In eapecial totliat interview. Our Interviowa at {hoso timen, tnat a wint ‘wan safd in the earlier oncs, was ze-sald [ very many forms in the tmmediately Succesnive and later ones, Q.—Do you remomber in tho observatious that 3r, Moulton nade to Tilton after you came in, in which spoke of what you lisd doneand it ought to bo sat- tory,~do_you remember auy auch plirases ss this being wied by Mouiton: * 1lo hae, {n iy opinlan, done evorything ihat a man could do up to the point of inaking s pubilc statoment of tho facta ”7 ~A.—No, sl thiero was no such thing sald, .—1Was there sny tmo during that interview, or Lefora that time, any deslrs for or propricty in a PUBLIC BTATEMENT OF PACTH RAISED 2 Follortoti—~That {8 ubjucted to, uir. Juigo Nellaon—Ho can state whist was sshil, Q.—Was thiero at any time bolween yout three, up fo thactiimo, s sugguition rom ansbody thst & publia atutement of facts oughit to be mude? ~A—No, sir, . Q.—Now, sir, did Tilton at this inferview, ofter Mouiton had sddressed bhim—wos ansthiug of this Rudsaid: * How can you expect me to speak to s man whio has ruinied my wife, broken my liote, aud who thien gula ny permission fu_a sad and sorious bour to visit {hni woman, aud uses that permission for purpones of dictating’ to her to make her writo down alie”™? A.—Was anything ko that sald by Til tontome? Q~-Yes, A—Nota worilof it Q:—Now, dd Aloultan, folluwing that, use expres- elots of thin kind: % But, Theodore, you must remera- Der thut Beecher Lias sent to you s feiter through ma humbling bimsctf before you as ho does bofore God "7 A=No, sir; no, sir, . " ADBOLUTELY FALBE." ir, at this interviow did anything of this ween you snd Tiiton afler an obeerss. of thia kind, which Titon {mparta to you: *1 Kknow it Ls but words. Words sre littleor notiing, and D0 nct of mine can undo the wrong I have doue,” Did you say nnything of this kind: #Tdid not put in suy ples for myself Lut ouly for her, and If you Garried out the demand communfeated to 1us fn your lettur of Oiristmas Day, that I would ratirs from my Juipit, or hide myself from my frienda by tnkinga foreigh voyigs”? A.~The iniputation of *any sich {bing se thak 0 16 is & wholesals ction; it i sbio- jutely folse, . Q.~Did jou say anything to this effect, that“Y il #ro T ) retira from publio ife "7 A.~No, alr; ¥ did not, 1 did not esy— 3tr. Beach—One moment, sir. Beécher—Ob, well; I did not asy it, DID NOT CONTEMILATE BUICIDE, Q.—Now did you ssy any such thing as “T haye 1ui¢ request to makos that f 1t bo ccessary for yoi lo make o public Tecital of this cans, that sou will give me notice of your ftention of it, 8o that I may elther g0 out of the world by aulcide, of hide from tiie sight of my fricuds by & voyago (o somie forelgn land "1 A~—No, slr, I mado no such foolith stutement sa it totulag upon which sich & tatomettcould bo founded, 1 Won nok anything maidon the sublect of pub- o Beach—T object to that aa beiag leading, Judge Nellson—~Ask what wia sald, ‘Q.—Wna there suytiing eaid by aniybody on the sib- Joct of publicity? Did.uothing come from Tiiton 7 A—Noturgatsllon that subjoct ab that fnterviow b T cecoliet, - QD DID Ng‘r FEAR 18 ‘Fflr‘l.hh P ‘, .~Did you say this, or anything of ihis import, or f36ts ¥ Aud furthermure, 1 ask you 10 do ma thix'fa. + tiat whoever elxa {n the wide world i to be in- foruicd of Lo facta of this case, st least my wife ahull gover know anything on the subject, for she is not only your cnemy, but may very resdily beoome mine ¥ A.—Do 1 understand you to ask if tife question was it after my statemont that I was golng to commit uufcide snd going on forelgn yoysgo ? Q.—Tiiat comea next, 7 there was mo such statement made, Q.—Vas anyihiing of the kind said about not inform. ing your wifs, for slia might become your snemy?t A—No, ulr; I hever hud & dread of that In my life, Q.—Did you eay this: 1 pang of baviug there coustder it an additional cocasion of gratjjudu No, sir} uothing of the sort, “I WA ALTOOETHER AT FAULT," Q.~Now, sir, during this foterview of thls 34 of faniary, i Mobiton's chamber, wat snything of ihis kind wsid by you to Tilton, and, if so, what: *f dont beg at all for myeelf, but for her [meaning Ellzs- bethi], Bho was not 10 blame, I was altogethier at fanlt, My sacred oficonnd my years sbould lave comUined to have made ma her guardian, dnd not her tempter "7 A.—Thero was something of tha aort sald, ,—And whit was tho connection 7. A.—J had—my fosling wat not for myself alonoj thatmy fecling and sy sympathios wero for Blizabeth 5 lat my ago and expericace should hayo enabled inoto have scen and foressen any mischief sucts aa had taken plac A suchsahad been reporied [0 you? fii.—fncn a8 hia en roported to me; sucl clicyed, ao- cording to the conduct of Mrs, Tiltou, had taken place, ANOTUER EMPUATIO DENIAL. Q.—Did you asy to Tilton this; that the relation. ship which ad existed between yourelf avd Eilza- both Tisd not siwaya been marked by soxual fatims. cy? A—No,sir; tio, air, It Is odloualy falso, 'Q.—That {he earliér years of It wore frea (fom any such taint and eriine, aod that only during {he lat Year or a littla moro {han & year, and that year short- Cened by & country vacation, Lad' that sexual intinisoy existed,—~did yoi say anyiblugof that kind? A.~It 1a intolorabloto be asked that question, but, befare Aluighty God, oo such queation’ evor, by suybody, at any tline, undér any circumatances, waa put L0 1, o any convursstion that might lead fo'lt, .—Or any such statemest made by you? A.—Nor aay wuch statement mada by e, Q.—Did you alao kay, or did you say that you did not know Liow youoould offer sny communicationor oxouse for yourself, sny you wanted Tilton 1o believe, for Elizabelh's aske and also for his own, that you Lsd never sought herfor valgar end, but that your soxusl cummnerce lad boen through love, and not {hrough Iust? A,—~1 never used sny such language as that, Mr, Evaria, Wan there any snch topic? A—No such topla, Avthat Julerview? A—Rowich tojlo at thai interview, nor ab auy other was it possible, I am obliged o hiear thoso questions put i court. Buch questiona could never Liave been put in any of tho in- terviews belwoen any of the partice concerned, Q,—Did you then, or llthn‘ time, xay auythlngof tufa kind 1 that you'had sought companfonaiip in her mind; that you' bud taken wanwscri er that ahio could be your critic, aud that biame belonged to you and not to ber? ~A,—That thero may Lave boen conversation m;-.unnng my reading to ber is very 1ikcly, though ot at that iterviow, At tuis I of s pleasure I derived from my intercourse ber, nover spoke of ber belug niy critic. DOES NOT DEMEMULEB, Q.—Now, on tis occasion, did you ssy $o ‘Tilten tLi¥, or auythiog likeits “Tell me, befors you go away, can you possibly over relnatato Eilzabetbln your Teapect aadlove?” A.—l remembos uosuch thing, 14 very likely may have happaned, but I Jedombar no such thing, 3 TAE ma: D’l NELL, 1 i —Do you remember burylog your face in your Lo Touk Hoar the b, ualig '8 fgure of tile Xind, Ju vespect fo which Tilion saids %1 wou's un- Aertako ta quote exact words, but Lo dmport of it was Jik tna: He used the Agure of & muu, and said ha ‘i on the brink, 8 one sittiug un the edge of hell,” Did you uke s ‘szpression of thet kind? A.~L did not § 1 migbt well have dous it, .nsw:u'ugnnfliux. i . —Now, sir, during thess conversations waa this -uegm spakon of in words of tuelr aquivalents, any Words Liko (heso, that you_ spoko w tho efect thad you wero in ureat grlef through owen's sctiou fu bis case, the ferinination of hix poko with to V'owen, aud to statcmeuts which you yourself hud inade, und you sald that Mrs. Beectioz bad beon moro inlblovouslu bee utterances thau yourolt; did youssy auything of tha kind? A—1 thick that that (s & very | garbled statement of tho easly partaf (ba Interview, sud wy regrete for interfereuce with blaaod g ATalrs with Dowon ¢ bat fo far as it rogurda oy wife T did not say that I regarded bor interforance as more miachiovous than mine, Q.—Did you meution to him at that intervisw Lt you had voluntarily written a letter *le day betors, In ‘which you spoke fn reforcnce to thd injurious state- ;uw;-g A,—1 may hive aaid a0, I don't remember t, I hs @ writhon thio Je:ter and ent it— Q—Written the lettor? A,~Vea, pir, T don't re- ‘membar mentioning that interview, Idid that sarly on New Year's morning,—thnt,is tho eccular NewYear, 100 20 0f January. Q.—tlow saon alter this, Mr, Bescher, 4l you have aconversstion? A.—That was on the 3d, 1 taku 1t, sir, I suapect thers wan not auy - other _time until the 1ith or 1ith in which did not res Moulton av!r{ day, Sometimes thers wonid bo & conversation, brjef{ Rometlines they were long conversatione, but thia was the laat interview, Mr, Evarts, T lllln\t, until somo tims in February, In which tho aubjoct of my relation to Thion's dinaaters (n busl- nesn ancd diessters {u hils houachold was cinctivaed sgali, From this time forward our intervlews con- cerued themeelvel In restoration, Q—Tn regard to Tilton'aatfaira? A,—~Torebulld—io restara "Iiton (o his position and prosperity and to res butid tho househiold were alinost catchwords, et THE BOWEN CHARGES. MM, DEECHED BXTLANA. Q.—Now,dld you havo about this time, betweon tha 3d and the middlo, or whatever dato you lix now, did you havo n definite conversation with Moulton about the Tth, or tlrereabauts in Jan- uary, in rogard to Bowen ? A.—1 &id, T had sov- eral proliminary or scquontial Intorviews, but thero wag ona that stands ont very distinctly in my 10membrance—ono before the Intorview of Moulton with Bowen, aud one immediately fol- lowing—I think tho very next dar. Q.—What was the canse of that inter- view betwoen Moulton and yoursolf, when this tople of Bowen was tho prominent ono? A.~My Impression s that it was s conversation in which Tilton, and Moulton, and myself were presont in the parlors of Moulton's Loniso, 1 know I had some convoreations with Moulton separately, and 1 think alluded to this In my general conversation in tho presenco of Tilton, and I think they were tho rensons of this, and they turnod tho con- versation on the subject of Dowou's treachery toward Tilion and toward ide. Mr. Beach —Did I understand you to sy that 24 this timo Tilton was presout 2 "A.—I do'think that, sir ; it was somewhote toward Jau 10, Mr. Bvarts—Qn or about the 1ith? A.~—Yes. ‘The onl{ aay Ihave of tixing laudmarks is by my lecturing ongagements. know by sitiation about the tupics of wmy lectures, and by tho dates of my lecturcs, where 1 wos when ‘out of town, so0 I throw theso converaations Inta the poriod they must buve come, 1 rocotlect tho datca, Lut I can’t rex call, except In some way liko that, which isllablo to ehift o day mors or loes, Lut Doc, 80, 81, and Jau, 1, these aro NOT MOVADLE PEASTS IN TUE CALENDAR. [Laughtor.] < Mr. Evarts—I supposs of the inferviews that oce corred betweon thices perinda this {a oue, Lut all inter- viows wero not with Tilton, Yoy don't rememiber whother Tilton was preseut or not, but this {a the ong which Moulton has “spoken of, "Now, elr, how did Moulton introduce this interview or topis about Bowea? A~—~Wall, Monlton's nrind wan nos resting any more npon me, He bad secured a_possibla peaco ‘botween Tilton and mo, and wa wore all joining forcen in some ronee, taking counsel as to Low Tilton’s mls- liap might be repaired, and 1 was carnestly desirous 1o do anything I could, Alr, Fullerton—That is not cnnnr::llun. Objected o, 7 e, Evarts—low did tho matler coms up? Tlow 41 Moulton Mntroduce tho matter? AL can’t ssy how he introducod ft, I can't say what were tho top-* lca that were disguused precisely fu tho order, hut the ntbject of convorsstion I can give,—of the discsslon ral tho substance of the matter discussed if you .Q.—SVell, wa {he subJect of your provious relations with Bowen introduced? A.~—It was very thoroughly Lrought {uto viow, Ho wanted me to glve an account of my difficultics snd my relations wilh Dowen, o wantod to explors the ground, snd ses exactly where Lowen stoad, and whero 1 stood, sud I gave him, Aherefore, a succioct view of ‘WIHAT I THOUGIT OF BOWEN, and then T went back and gave my view of the prin- cipal points of the difticuity which had sprung up between Lowen and myself, and I gave him an sccount of nn_iutoryiow for the purposs of reconviling ail difficulties that had taken place Letween Lowen snd myself of January and February, 1670, Q.—At Froaland's house, apoken of befors 7 A.—At Frocland’s houso ; aud I answered all quesiions pat 10 e na to what Bowou's naturo war, his socessibility, what ho wonld be likely to feel, aud wlst not likely {o facl, 1 s endsavor 1o make Bim do Justica ta o, Q.—Ycs. Now, at thot Interview was anything sald to you of any letter which Mr, Tilton bad' weitten, or -wae written to Bowen? A,—I understood Br, Tiiton was preparln.{’ A documentary exhibit which it was hoped would bring Dowen 10 the dischargo of bLis ob- Tigations, but no letter wan oyer, sliown me untf} the oar 1873, 'Thin was talked about in my presonce, but 1 not 'sc it until T observed 1t in the Golden Aqe, It is the 6 manuscript ‘was attached to the tri- partite agresment, It w: ot read, nor any part of it vead, In my presanice, though the contents wrers dis- cussed, ' Q,—Now, whatiwss salil to you? Was anythingjentd ta you by Moulloh as to Bowen'a motlves or resson for making ~ any such charges sgalnst you? A.— 1 don't recollect, in that, preciso form, anythil of the lind with Bowen, 'Moulton miked me dis tinetly whother the storles ihat Bowen kad told Til- ton, and which THiton had repeated iu somo fustances, —whether thers waa any truth in them, and whether T was afrald of Bowen on account of thess stories, 1 told bim na, 1 . DRFIED NIX TO DO 118 WORAT hefore the worlds that these stovies 1 was not afrald of in tho sligltest degron, Q,~Now, air, in what terms aid 3louiton express bimself after ur converastion with Lim on those fopics, in regard to Bowen's coaduct toward you and fownsil Tllton? _A.—Well, #ir, ho sstiansted language in the {ntensity of Lls condemnstion, Bowen's course Lo thought to bo dishoncst, eruel, treacherons, and overy way mean, and ihcso words wero not spoken often, but fulniated,—that 13, they had an adjective before them, Q~Well, did ha say anything 2 o bia view of Bowen's puirposea n using Tiiton ugalust you, and you agninet Tilton? A—Yas, sir; then, and ofted afier, 'Qu—Woll, whiat did ho say? A.—ilo 4aid ke meant to omploy Tilton ta dostroy him, to destroy mo, and mo to destro; other up, an Q.—Did you, Tillon, Wo warefo Lave eaten cach Joft tho track clear to bim, st this intorviow, give Monlton a full | account of youe Interview with Howes at Frocland's 7 Q.—And of ila resnlta? A—I did, aud ho waa hor- ror struck with the narrotivo that1 gave, He ques- tianed ma whother it was posulble, b Q.—Did ‘you mentfon to Moulton st that timo the conolusion {n your publis statement at tha church of foment betwoen Bowen aud yourself? A~ . 1gsve him agraphicaccount of the inter- view and Jta sequences, and reconciliation, ratifisd In Plymouth Chiurch st the close of & Fridiy night prayer- meeting, between Lowen and myrelf, Q.—Now, in wholever statornont Monlton made Lo 74 concotiing any coatents or proposed_contouta of 0 letter or documen that Tilton was proparing for Dowen, were there any names of delalls given you concerning woy of the charges sgalust you? A,—I don't know that it was montioned in regard to thelr be- {ng included {n that document, Whilo wo were talk. fpg about that wo wore talking of Bowen and hi chkges, and it was & goncral couverastion, not histar- fcally and logically arranged at all, and In that conver- satlon, a parcel of which ws s proparing of docu- ments, his chargos wero mentionod and discussed, They wero uot mentioncd L0 me a8 they afterward: poared in the letler, . —1Well, did Moulton eay that Bowen sajd that you nad confeared adultery to bim? A~ think ho did, Ves, ho said 80, but I was besjtatiog as to whether it wan at that Interviewor uot, Lo suld o at sowe one of the interviews, Q,—Well, what did you reply to that 2 A.~T think Ilaugbod, snd denled it, When I confess udultery to Tlowols, I & aure to be impuure dn my mind, (Laugh- tor.] 61D you aey to hitn on st sublect whther o no fiowen lad ovor mado any suchkhrgs or lmputats- tlon to you'persoually 7 A.—T salu bo him that, from tlio origin of the dificulilea betwoon Howen snd me in January of Fe of 1870, and_sgain on Deo,’ 2y {here had been adjudications and arbitrations—that 4e, ihore liad boen inany conversations, but Bawen had nover auy diticulty with ine, EXCEPT BUBINE#H DIFFIOULTIES, and that he never, underany _circumsiances, made & Statoment which fmplicated my moral chrracter, Qe Now, air, In this conversation what was mald by Moulton in regard to the treatont or management of ilton's pecuniary claim sgeinst Bawan, about ita be- ing carriud Juto courd or not? A.~lle 'spoke of it, T racoiloct distinctly, s & thing that was inevitablo: that Lo was bound ta age justice done ta Theodore Tilton, Tlespoke of it with an intonsity sud enthuxiasm_that Tadmived. Lo enlisted my admiration for his delity 1o bis friond, and, 88 T am notan expert in businoss, 1 folt unbounded confideuca in his rosources ta carr out o businessarrangement, and latened to him wufl sdmirition, Q,—Now, did Moulton during this fnterview or any ather say to you that he (Moulton) ¢id mot wish to thio clatm of Tiiton against Howen into court, be- ng of it into court was going to rip up ous With Tiltou's fumlly ¥ A—No, slr ; Ro, Bic; nover, Q.—Nothing of the kind 1 A.—Nothing of the kind, You will aeo that when you como (a auéthier Iuterview, Evarta—0b, well, st bs euough, This kuterview I enough of ltself, WILL LEARN TO DEIAS Mr, Bescher (to Deuch)—1 shall loden gradually to ‘behave, air, ughter,] Q.—Did Soulou tall you that hewould rather pay ‘Tilton what Bowen owsd bim thun to rip up your rels. Aions with ‘Hiiton’s family, or anything offuct? Ao, uir, ‘=6 you remerpber thet during ihat conversation when you were usalng poiuts of diticultios tha ‘were exiating betweou you sud Howen, whetler suy Tromorandui of those. Doliis wis spoken of and Brougs outin auy wey't "oty i ) was apcke Sr U6 Maution that 1 Hsd at Kome Turiber (& ket 2w o6 Tay owrn docutaenta)—iat T Lisd 8 fow sncie e Botta that were 15 discusaton at 1o INTEDVIEW LETWEEN OWEN AND MISELY— the last toterview, oAt Frsaisadwt A.—At Froslands N T Aroiie waiited e 40 briug thom to bim, T ik o et day, ouwediately ‘aftr oF very Shonafion 1 busiod Abem up sad Lrought thea 1y °| b, .~Did you dellver that psperto Moulton st that Interviow, or soon sitor 7 A.—It wad alont this time 1 began ta put e docuinsuts into Lis hands, These wero the frst polta, Q.~That psper was i Bowsn'y mdwflllufi A= Yes, air, [Witnces ldeutiliod papes] Tulsis oranum : Pirat, report and publish sel turs-room Latka ! aecond, neweditor of lection aud Freeland’s Iuforest 3 thied, expi cliurchy fourth, writs o a Jottors Afth, retract a overy guaclar what ias Leon aadd oty fnsury, Q—Thin camd from Yowen? A.~Yos,nir; Iun- orstond it i, & Q.—~And dlil there form the fopien of conversation it iad witls Moulton? A,—Yen, iz, they ditl; I took up d told Lim what esch was on e4ch point, er going tbrough this matter of sour Bowon's affalrs with Moulton ou this oceaston, (o ou seiuembor, thia fubject comitig upsof youe eclin n rugued to aay injury you litd dons Tilion 7" A~lu that orider of thino do,yott mean 2 Q.—1 mean sfter {his convarsation about Dowen il youl, was there between you and Moulton—stat whatfier {hnt toplc suggeated any exprosalon by you of feclingn it regard to having taken aldos againet Tilton withs Bowen 7~ A,—1 dou't recallect ang, ir, Qu—Was nnything sald hys¥oitlton ax 10t or Jropriety of you nud Tiiton's combiniig, sir; that was (hs one that flowed through evo: vorsation. It wan tho leadiig ddea, *YOU AND TILTON MUST S8TAND TOGRTNFR,” Q.—A8 toward whom? A,—For the ke of thie fantlly, for the nako of Festoration, aud for.tha aake of Juntico from Bowon to Lim, Well, ss I remomber it, 1 Bupposa T canuot tell what T thougbt, Q.—No i only whnt pasted betwazn.yor, Now, did Moulton at this stage of the conversation staio to you what b proposed do, snd whst _coirse ho _ proposed in mmltécs with Bowen? A—Ys npoka with the utmost confdence of compelling Dowen (o disgorge, I hink it was at thia tnterviow, I think 1 was at this ono, that ho kaid Lio wauld bring bim 1o his macrow bonér, Ho spoko ot s Intervlow of Lis purpose belng to bring Bowen into snch n situation that s would do bim Justico of Liimeell without Arbitration or legal procecdings, That cin tho polut tat the woro aliaug at,aa L viniir= aud i, Q—~U0 you romember, Mr, Doecher, at one Intor- viow austhing of tuln kini safil by Soulton in regard to this Jetter to Bowen, (hat TILTON WANTED TO IUBLISIT THE LP R, and that lio i takeg out of ¢ ol that concurued yot and your relations with Lis family, and that bo wanted to leave, and wan willing to leavo'you aud Toweh in coutfict. Do you remember that ho exprensed_himsolf fithatWway 7~ A~Noples thero was o lelter wiown {a e, Ticre vas 1o discusslon that could Lavo taken laca, & PG Do you remember hia saylug that he Al not xp- 1E0V0 of Bitclt & coitras,~ho (Moulton) did not approve of such s publieation?’ A,—Y don't remember, Q.~=Now, in that name raonth of Jantiary al s somo. whiat later perfod, dil_you_bave an inferviow with Moulton at bun houss concerning sn inlerviow he had tiad with Bawen? A1 did, tho noxt duy, Q.~Tile moxt day” after the taterviow was Lisd, whenover that wua? A.—Yes, sir. Tlow did this intorview Lotween yoursclf and Moniton como about, and wharo was it hold? A.—I sujpose it camna abont by my own wiali to hear what Lad happenod between him aod Dowen, 1 know Lo vias golng to sco Limm, aud 1 hud given U docunents thint Bie naked, anl 1 fiturally destrod to Leir nbout the Intervicw, It waa at s houso, .—Now, What did_Moulton tell you at that intor- view a6 to what kud paseed etween i and Dowon ADOUT TILTON'S PAME. Whero find ho seen Bowen 7 A.—At hix Louss, ‘ol at whore bousa 7_ A,—-Moultow's, Y cous vited to comie two daya before, and appulnted the day alter to-morrow, a8 I understood ft, aud vn that nigut Mo told me that'howas present, aid*that a fong and full conversation had passed between them, which converaation Lis deacribed minutcly and dramatically, Q.~Wril, just glvo us this couvcraation as fully se you recall it, A.—Ho detalléd to me sith ‘soma pare Ticularity—with mnoro psrticularity than I con ro- heurse it hers—tho siatement which he had made to Dawen of bis (Bowen's) treatment to Tiltoa and the infary of his conduct in proguring Tlllon to writo the letter of the Gtls, and then the promiso to take it and back It, aud theh stand right out from underaud go over to my #ids, 1fe went into that with relish, Lo ticn also opencd on Bowen with regard to H18 TREATMENT OF ME 1n a paraliel Instance of Infarmy that waa almost with- out example, Ho rehesrsed to him tho differont storfes that e hud reported of me, snd that when [ B had interviews at one time and suother with him, ho bad never durod to mentlon ono of these storica to niy face, but only bebind my back, and that they never came up except in the settlement of some mouey ditl- culty between us, Ha thon told _Dowen that the last grand settiement hod taken place betwesn him and moat Freeland's house, in the preseuce of Tiltun, in tha carly part of {ho seats Q—Of 18i07 A—i810, That st that tims he said * you want aver ho ground thoroughly with Beocher, oand you had gona over every causo of offensa that ou bad againsi him, snd con disgussed, and itlemont amicably. effected, Frocland Liad come and abaken Iy vith botl of yoti, and thint you hed waikod with Deecher through tlo nirects, discussing how ko and you might work to- gether ovor afterwards,—wrork In amity and peaco s snd ufter Bocobior, fn_futfiliment of his prowise, had goue to the houso'of God, and had thors, In the pres- cncoof his people, rehcarsed th reconciliation that bad taken ~placo betwoon him and you, sud yott went down ond shook bands Wb nim at tho foot of the altar, and low, within foriy-clght hours, you could tell a tnan’s friends that you had that wbich' would drive Beochior out of town ini forty-cight onra iF you should apesk of 18 7; that I had taken ihe docurment in toy hatds and bad shook {t in lis fuco, ond hio turned as pale sa 8 ghost, ond Ls said ¢ whatsbiall Tdo7" Teald, "1t {a niot forme lo tell you what you sbould do,” 1o sald, looking up st the portralt hangiag on 180 wal, » [ afall nover bo recog- nizad,, T ubull gever bo sblo o rerouizo that min again, SQi—Portralt of whom? A=y porlrat, by, Patge, the portrait which was then lnnging thera. Then Lo a8l Towen was ready fo do anythiog, Then, nid I ¥ YWhy didn’t you get money oitt of hm?" Mo matd tho o had not, or was not, como for { what Dowen shofild do was £a put Tiicon Ivfevendent.” Tt wsa Wit Lo oughv L do, taceas, : After thorecees tho examinntion of Mr, Beecher was reaurued. Q.—Wns anylhing sald by Moulton as to whether Tiltorr eauld work on tho Christian Union 2 A,.~Nat at that fotorview, - I think, air, it wea not far from th it elonged to bat sszmo period and Lo that state of thin Qoin_ (bt month of Janusry? A.—Tle never sald exactly that, Ifospoke of what 8 grand thing it woula l'}nll ‘Tilton and I should joiu forcos on tho Chriatiun wion, Q.—AFell, what dId you reply to that ?2_A.—Well, my repily was thint that was an abuoluto impossibility, ‘This circumstancos wurrounding that paper, and tho focl: ings of the persons enguged 4n it, would not permit such an aasoctution, Qu=Do you rurnembor anything of & vielt you mada when Moulton was serioualy ill, to meetiug Tilton there, aud haylog some passages between yourself and him? A—Woell, I remembor several, 1t'wus not an infrequer t thing, s Q.—Do you remember being thereat that ttme, when Moiilton 4 regsrded by you seriously ill—danges~ ously $il7 A,—Yes, alr, Q.—During that fiineas, do yon remember meeting Tiiton at that honse whoro Moulton was very sick, an inyihing paesiog Lelween you and him{ Al do ol soam to rocall auything more tan that wo imet ero, Q.—Mr, Tilton hix spoken of it sa an occaston on which you kissed him on ihe forehosd, Do you ro- member snyihing about that? A—Yes,sir.” Ho i right'within aboui 4 inclios, 1o atooped, and 1 kissed himn on the month, (Laughter.] I cawe from sbove, whiers T bad seen Frank. Mr. Moulton wan sufforin from rhiumatism on tho_cheat or heart. 1lo wan nol well, was suffering, and 1 was apprelionsive—I don’t knotw that it was declared to Do my Judgment—1 was spprehenslve that in ona of thoso attacks ke might suddvaly go off, and I . VELT DEEP BYA[PATIIY FOR 113, When Tsame downestairs Tillon was Iu tho parior, 1 et ki, and spoke o him &8 a friond to Lotli of ‘us, Q,—poke of Moulion to THllan? A.—That fa what 1 sald about hiw eritical condition, and there wers some. other words Interchqngod. T don't know what, but in thip whrmth of Lhal\ eympatietlo. moment WS Kiseed each othor, any expression like *Tyeodore, Frauk baa saved my life, snd I would willingly give wy lifa to save Frank ™ A, —No, ir, T don’t remember any preciso languago ke that, Laitght have sd T would bo willing auioet o give wy o 10 save bis, Q.—Do you,remomber any oxpression of this kind : “ Frank {4 vory slck, aud I am'sfraid Lo wil die, sud {hien, Theodare, what would become of your casa and " °A.—No, 1donot recall any stch, Q—r, Tlocctier, 1 understatd you have sald dis- thucily thut the Iettér of Tilton to Bowen was not shiown {0 y0u or ead bo You at naterviaw ot o Uo7 A.— was uot, . Q:=Tiicho wan no faturvtew st tuat tmo at which Tulion was prosont at which any such acourrence taok placa? A~=No,alr, Not withln my momory, Q.—DId nny iaterview oceur with Tilton and Mout. ton at this perlod during January, the sarly part of Junuary, from the 7th oaward, i 'which any relation you bod with tlat letter or T\y connection which T+ ton and your alTairs Lad willi the lellor, was tho sub- Joct of converuation between you 7 A.—1 did not kmaw thore waa any such lotter untll the spring of 1472, 1 know thore wers alips In tho progress, and iho docus menta torming if, whieh ware to bridg a settlemont with Bowen anda atatemont ¢ but did ot know that it took the form of n letter, or that 1t was o Jotter that I had anything to do with's I'did not know of fta con. tonts : T hud o moru knhwledge of It, uud ng mora ta do wiih It, than I bavo of things traiacting iu China, e BESSIE TURNER, MR, DEECUEL'S KNOWLEDGK OF UEE. Q.—Do you remombor, Mr. Bescher, whether atany of tho luterviewa spoken of about this mlddle poriod of January, or ab suy Lime,there- abouts, at any luterviow betweon Moulton and youteelf, did anyihiug of this kind ocour on the subject of Misa Dessle Turcer? DId Moulton tell you that Tilton thought Doasie Turner waa & dangerous peraou to have about ; that she knew of all the facts as between Beocher and Mrs, Tilton 7 0, sir, Bhall I givo the full knowlodga of Bessts ‘Turner ? Q- No, not at tbis moment; a Uitle farther on, No, sir § nothing of the sost. . ‘Q.—~Did suything of that kind occur? A, —Nothing of that kind ; that s, I am epoakivg with reference to her removal, Q~Tho period in January? A.—~During January, Detalo Turner was spoken of, aud her storios woi apoken of, but T understood your queation with refe eice to her pocessary removal on sccount af her knawlodge of wy relstions to lrs, Tilton, Q.~Yca? A.—Thero was no such knowledge in sny way brought {6 me, Y.—Aud id ‘Moulton say snythiog of *this kind to ol 1 tiought she wat belter ol of g way Lhan cro”? and did you yeply: Y thought so too™? A.—T never satd it,"and T uover auswered {n any such y. "Y'—Was ft sepresentod to you by Moulton atan suths tnterviow {uat Mre, Tiifon sald, ss Tiiton tol Tk, that tho best woy was for lior fo'be out Weat to achidol? A—No,kir, L kuow uutling bbout ber golug Qut Weat {u scodl, . : Q—~Did you tell of tlis tims that Tillon could uot aftord to pay her axpenees, ant Al yon sa; Will pay tin vayonncs of do Ay ¢ Viny nerernst koep tuin mtory down,” or anytulng of that kint 7§10 Nothiug of tua eort,’ 'Tliera wan 'na conultailon aj me of sy aart or ddescrl| ion wIth £ ficl.tn ti poeltion of Iceale urncr, Tlin rat kvwiedgo [34] of her whieroaboula 1 was called wpon to p - fustalizucnt, IR0 e iy 1 e MRS. MORSE, BER LETTER To NEECHEN, Q.—In tho latter part of Jauuary of that yeqy, Mr, Decclior, an Intorviow tns boen mpokeq of by both 3ir. Moultou and Mr, Tilton, at whig), 2 lotter of Mra. Morac's waa Lronght utder cop, sideration, A.—Toward the ond of January { recolvod o lottor from Mis, Morso which | Rirg to Alr. Moulton [banded lotter by Mr, Evarla), I remombor this lottor. I took It ty Moulton, I prosumo ho rend it, sud p, kopt it. Wo had a convorsation aboyt it Ho rend 1t in mny presonco and bofore py, 1 naked lim Mow it ought o bo troated, and hy g awerad thnt Lio thought it onght to e troated kip g Jowmid Mra, Moree was cracy, aud hated Tosoil: Tilton; that shio maguificd stories that wero nol gy and tiat she devotedly lovod her davghior, Tt wa o ptimed (hat thiv wioie lotter wanto bo treatod an s py i fuation of Mra, Mu1as, aud tho cliarges with regey to Tilton wers o o douled, w (hoy wero not trugs''y wrota s lutter In answer to Mra, Morgo In Mr, jioy, Laua roioico iows o lottr, T iy (1 st which I drow up and showed bim, whie mq‘ : .(:.,Mm‘m'.,, 1 n' 1 : 1 Pl .~AL this intorview wns anything sald a pasiase in fhat Toitor which futos to Tilton's byttt £aid that you . PUEACUED TO I'ORTY OF YOUR MISTRESSES ¢ Waa thero anything (i that lottor of atra, Mo cliurging that Tilton had stated 187 Ac=Well, elr, flial ehrgo mado In that letter 7 "M, Tioach shook bfs hewd, Hoscler o dic, losch)—Ho thoygt, i1 Uellova floro 43 oo t Degéiner ipon that agblects 0 L 48k Teler, 1t A.—=That letter contuiued oimply & chiargs of p, tho stury of Lis domcstlo. dieuiies iy .—Was thera any consarsation at sither of tyy interviowa of Wb 10th of Jonuary, ini which thes toples wora whonglt of,-3lrs, 31aso or her Ty Was anythiug sald about whothet or no Tilton told more oF loes persons (twelve personn) of jo (Doechiori) crimlunl velations with afes. Tilton? 42 Not and thero wan nothing in tho letter and totblyy ln’.l'}'m coermation, ach—[ wove (o have the foro part of » stritck out, i Yn g “Tlio Court—Well, it may bo oxcluded. Q.—A\ that futerviow or in that leiter was anyity: 83l to you of Tilton's having told any number of je aus, 10lve or any uther umber, of Your crilud o Iationship with his wifo? ~A,=TLtto was no euc conversation about criminal " relationa wilh' i, “Lilten, 5 CRIMINAL NELATIONS AGAIX DENIED, Q.—Wus thero at ny tnse §o uny of those coasens. {loua from tho beginulng un to tha period wo Lursncy reached, a3y tha end of Jaunary, 1i1, ony merig made i your heatiug by Moullon ‘or Liltou that gy was criuiinal relation, or cver hed beel, between oy sl D, Tllton? £~No wueation aud 10 tapice on, Q.~Was tho word “erlma " {n_regard to yon it uned by cither of ioso_gentiemen or iy olag in Jour prenciico 4 A,~Nb, 11003 DO Auch lem, Q.—Now did anything of thiu kind occur at tbiaiy toriow, ar (ither thovo lutcrsiows, at tho ond of Ji uary: 43 Mr, T, say toyou, “T fhien sabd that ey 3ra, TMiton Liad made hur tonfeasion to me in Juy 1470, that I had shorily after that informed Ofns Joliuson and Mrs, Nartha Bradshaw § that during iy smmaner 1hud {uformed o other porson, butl tof him possibly . twelvo persous did know of that faxt ‘Wan Ihere auy convorsation of that kind thot Lad g thing to do with any erimiunal relations Lotween 5 und rs. Thlton 7 A—No: nothing. AMr, Evarls—Nov, wero the names of Oltver Jobean and of Mre. Mariha Dradslaw, sa porsons toaws.a anythlug tad been conumunicaled, Ditrodured at they conversationa or either of them in January? Al think not, sir, 1f they were, 1do not remumber i, Yot of their names came 1 later, but I do ot rwall biem a8 beingy mentioned as carly ns this, Q.—At eitlier of those conversitions was Usere iy, thing said about Tilton aving suld or reforied tuh you PREACHED TO YORTY MINTRESSLS or any number of mistressea I your church? A No, sir’} ot us late ns (ho last of Junuary, Toblien did any convorsation oceur abont it AT aliould thiuk Jt was somewhira ahout during thy Girat iwo weekn of Junusry, 1 went toMoilton witas atatement that Tllton Lad made, thut ‘it had broogst 10 mo by czedible nuthority, sud this was sfter things wrers in & train for Larmonlons adjustment, Ho deskid 1t {n behalf of Tilton. Q.—Moulton did7’ A—Tes, sir. Subsequently by oxplained (o e that o Lad “aeen” Tilton, and (i ‘Tilton Jiad roctified tho statement which Lo nisds fo e pistter it waa likely to do fujury. Q.—Was tiere anything eaid at these conversations, or any of them, {n_reguzd o Inforination given by Til ton concornng the relations between yoit and drs, “Tilto, 10 hier mother, Ars, Morae, aud wers yo in- formed at elthicr of thoso converastions by Mrs, Tiltoa —by 3, Titon—that Mrs, Tilton had juformiod Ly mother, Mra, Morso? A.—I do not reealt It, Q.—as anything eaid about Jonopl Richrds, Mo, Thitow's brother, hiaving coms to Lint (Tliton) wi snked bim whetbier or not o had_ soticed B ¥lsits 10 Lia house, and whetlier ho was quite s tht they wero altogettior of _ pastoral cnarice] Wan thera any conversation of that characler? A= Uotween me and whom 1 Q.—And Tilton?_ A.~No,sir; no, sir. Q.—Was there anvtiing rald to'you by Tilkon of i naturo, that Mre, Morso Wwas PrOPOgAting & shaten $n this \ay, amely : ‘That sha was raying smong:t family aud rolatives that Theodora maue sich sl such chiarges ogaiust Eilzabeth, and that her mecyd uf doouncing ‘Mlitn fOr mAKing such cbarg.. s34 very fatal way of propzgating tho carges thein rivt] AT oliall Bavo to bavo that agans, sl 1didsst ot oxactly the Lang of thoquostion, Q.—Tho question fa -whother th1s conyersaticn, 1y sucl conversation, {ook placo? A.—I tbink i imponalble for such a atatemont fo be remembersh Lad §t ever been mado; but I do not think tht the st slance that T seem 10 gathor out from that questba camo futo tho conversatlon Lstween s, Variuw ond divers were the converations in reapect ik animoslty that Mrs, Morso had agatost him, and len may bavo fallen oiif, incldootally, ono thiog sadas otlicr bearing upofi 1t bt 1t Was scatiered upsnd down futo convorsations in such & wey taliihu oscaped my mind o that I cannot give it. Q.—Tilton #aid to you? A.—Ail thoss things, \—Anyihing of (his kind, whether Lo told yoa & Morss was propagating the utory in ks, namely, that sho waa saying amoug her family sof relativon that Theodore made Auch charges sgilil Elizabeth, and tbat ber method of denouaclnt Wim, that 18 ‘Tdton, for making ut charges, was & very fatal way d [romsgaling tho charges thomactvcs, | That 0, 4 ira, Morso's denurciation of im for making thed cliarges aatnat hts wifo was ¢ mode of giving publity 10 tho chiirges thomselvas? A,—I dou't romeabet i dofinitencss, Q.—Dut gbistever may or may not havo beeasnid it regard to any propogation or statemcnt of suystar was it sald to you by either Moulton or Tiltonthat su) wak b story of erimina} relatlous beieree vou and 3rs, Tilton 7 A.—Nover, Mr, Tiiton nor it aulton nover stated to mo that Mra, Morse wal el culating that I hiad had critminal tntercoursa wilh b daughfer.. . Q.—Nor anytling of thatkind? A.—Nor soythiof of that kind, —_— RECONCILIATION, BEEOOER'S LETTERS TO MUy, TILTON. Q.—You remembor, Mr, Boeoher, that then aro throo lottors fn evldenao, all boarlug date of Tth of Pebruary, 18712 7 A.—1 do, sir. Q.—Now, sir, do you romembor an foterviex shortly proceding that date, and with whom! A.—~With Joulton. Q.—Where waa that 7 A.—A¢ hiaohouse, # Q.—Was the subject af whether or no Bower wauld reatoro Tillon to tho-Independent broughi up by Moulton ? Fullerton—That fs londing question, sa¢ very abjoctionnbie, Judge Nollson—Yon might ask whether a0y thing was sald on that subjeet, snd If 8o, whth 1t Is rathor loading, I thini. Lvorts—\Was anything said at this conver® tlon as to whother or uo Bowen would restort Tilton o the Independent? A,~L don’t rocil it connection with that inforview, i Q.~What was the commoncemont of {hat laterveRs aa you do rocollect 17 Ac—I don't knowi I remiomber what the commencemont was ; I resien tha ubstance of ft, " Q~—Well, was Tilton's relations or expeciations B regurd (0 'tho fndependent mado tho subjict of versation st that {uterviow? A,—Ay own Bopre 18 that they were not, " A8 ell, was suything sald sbout say otlier paps . —=Yoa, sif, Q,~What was that? A.~—Well, the Golden ‘"m -:: 1hés under discussion, ~ “Tilton fe going 1o ML & papor for hiiaself," wan tho koy-note, sud 1t ¥ e you sy g0 n, A,—1 dont pretead ~} 0 on, Al give the ordor of thanght, nor the lmguags bil tho body of the futarview or disousslon ws TILTON MUST UAVE AN OUGAN o\ for Limaelf; thiat he aba'u't bo voiceloss nor B and that, with my influence and tha of mAircy sud gl of his friends 8 -fourdl Lo uablucd, = oand lr ows ¥ et d auch ator s stand together “unltedly, and ennnsuy Al& evurytilug might bo socomrlsBe thiat ono groat easo of working waa that Elizgbeth dii not 42 00 at home ; Lt alie was discoutentod and suli that it wre impoesiblo to expect & mfll‘ of (snd Moulton spoke of Tilton ua & ma ¢ work all day, for b asid * L't it grand, ihst {ust uons ovie there sud taken o comt and iy o work right'at the bottons again a8 if L BIC 5, dng to carn hla bread.” 1l d O moariita fos & paasof genlun {0 retard B4 dnuh % it aa finpossd \aiid dd bia wite crying, or sitiog st of the table, sullen and unconversablo, Bid, freitaind Llm, 1o saids Theodors |s esier Iod Ly bia aifectfons thon any man Ahat €360, g Elizabeth can do suyshing wilh i, sud sb68, hacr part, and you must heip to make bert To tho geieral form of couuwls and then be S48 kel e e s el o give ta thin new enterpr! iy &f feoling sud i, 1t would be 8 8% thing 1 BIOULD WRITE A LETTED T0 l‘mf - Qlanlion) far iz {0 ytow fl'xw‘n‘-‘.yw;u;mirn ] o rxpressl ol -‘i‘.fi,‘fii Al n Lotkat 40 Mes, 'Fiiton, with whow, ll: wiord infiucuce, Lo said g auy UV ot uig o .