Chicago Daily Tribune Newspaper, May 13, 1874, Page 2

© THIS CHICAGO DAILY TRIBUNE. WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 1874, to have it undorstood that s dards was not contemplatod. T dgo>movad to,amend by makix tho rosolution'covor tlie entiro form of tho gov- erumpnt and' Confes PROF. SWING. ! [Tiauglhter | forent; thitig sotually from whiag! sslon of ‘Talth, grentod ‘that itho Resumption of His Trial Before the Pres- __bytery. Prof. 'Isatt'on ]}egifis the Argu- ment-for the - Prose- " oution. -, time that ought to bo devotod to other businoss, It would bo bottor to lot tho mattor rest until the ] wan disposed of, = Mr, Iurd moves tho tablo tomporarily, A, K0 CRITIOISM DESIRED. - Dr..Pattorson.offerod the following t rolued, That, in _tho 10 the iltorcats o d that tho résolutioii bo lald on’ ndgmont of this Jud! of our ecclealnntical donrts, thn and copocially the parties, o in the cano now.ponding, ho publication and ciroulal aiame upon tho actlon of tho court, incusniona of {ho merits of the cano oiitside’ of the Judicatory beforo the final fasue I8 roachod. * Thin, aleo, for- tho rongoh thht ' it would pro- voka dobato, was laid on Bome disoitsaion followed shonld be occuvied in making tho *argumouts “but & disposition belng shown to place no ro- nrty, it ‘wos docided nob was hoped the e bonnds of !* a roasunable timo," | and. from publio: He Thinks They Canhot Avoid .Convicting the Ac; . d 88 Lo tho timo which striotions upon 'either to it thom, though Koep within th ARGUMENT FOR THE PROSECUTION, Prof. Patton thon bogan tho P"}'Im“"fi"‘f;‘lgmng ity of I g0 iy o rontized the rosponsibility o sition, and the difiloulty of hls undertakiv, P Grava | of tho ohurohes of the Old or the New Bohool. olirrgos wore preferred agalnat a popular mihis. tor, who was loved by his congregation, the sympathios of tho city, Lo man; Trosbytors he stuod in tho ralation of & creonal friond, 'Thoy sud he (Swing) had been n the Labit of - taking nrgumont for tho And Regards His Plea as an Insult - to" the Preshytery, ' He Analyzes Mr, Bwing’s Ser- .mons at Great Length. ¢ tho | union, and bolioved ‘that the Ohurch held to the Ovarm | inapiration of tha Seriptures and tho doctrino of | . st looked like s deided statoment, sweot counsol . to- the samo? family hnd beon impaneled ry to-lislon to the charges proforred alnist ono of thoir numbor by o strangor. ould not think it strange if tholr firat fmpulss wore tostand by their friends, and, "whatover, their doubts might have boon with respect to' | 1p and assort it by nhnwln% that thoso woro not 'y tho proolous blaod of Josus Ohrist. It Prof. | would not rogard Dis zeal. for tha point of dif-. hurch divided. 'Bwing admitiod that, dootrino, ho slurred it over |foronco which soparated bim. from them, as-an. ilnd’ foeling -toward that; And Olaims He Does‘ Not Show Himself Faithful and Zealous, Lis soundnoae in the faith, to huah thom in thelr dotermination, aud shiold him He undorstood that OTHER QUESTIONS MIGHT DE NAISED on ‘tho threshold of. tho discussion. roBparity of & church by an issue, Why call mon from tho active dution of the pnstorato‘to adjudicate doctrinal issuca?” ** Why initinto proceedings which oud ‘wo know mnot whore, aud be fra consoquoiices wo know mot what " questions he answered, “Wocan afford to risk; womething when tlie cunso of truth 1s in issue.”’ He who came-to & sesvica' like_ this, it would soom, should bring gray hairg'and'a rips’ expoti- ence, }rom hiu heart;lio wishad that one more spoot of thie® Court’ stood in He Is Specially Severe on the Sermon : from reprowch. Concerning John Stuart 5 The Accused Not a Good. New Sch Presbyterian. And His Witnesses Unable to De- tect'Heresy. desorving of tho T 0D 1AD BEEN FIT % urden upon - his young shoulders, and bo was doliigg s will, Whint niado him ate tompt to stem tho tido of publio sontimont nsclousness of right, nud what un- ips_in sucl’s presonco was -the hie pleaded tho injured cause of: his *! ITo who i my advocato at tho {xight hand of tho Majosty on bigh sustain me in tho soryico which I undortake to-di The' Prosbytors who wore ministers and ho hind takan tho samo voivs,—vowa that thoy would bo faithful in maintainiog tha truths of. tho Clospel ; and ho craved their indulgence, and that of tho Elders, whilo Lo prosouted the evi- ‘dohico and tho.argumont_on which tho cnse of the prosooutor rosted., Ho asked them to dis- mies from thoir miuds all personal questions, to bring to tho consideration of the subject a judi- oinl ptate andfrome of mind, and -to so nok that thoir decision would - advance tha glory of God, and bo a vindication of His truth, RS YONM OF THIE OHARGLH, { Thoy would notico thas tho churgos prefarred pgainst Prof. Bwing wore in tho form of a tra- verso of his ordination yows. [ to cast tho I The Poseoutor Will Appeal if Dofentod. *Tho Obicago Prosbytery roassemblod o' ihi locture-room of tho First Prosbyterinn Church, cornor of Indinnn avenué and Twonty-first Btroct, at 10 o'clock yesterdny morning, tore- sumo tho trial of Prof, Swing. The Moderator, tho Rev. Arthur Mitchell, ocoupied -tho Chair. Tho attondance, nobwitbstanding the: raln, was vory large, a great many of tho ladios coming to tho church in carriages. spectators presont than on any of the precoding | days, tho majority cccupying seats in tho body of the hall in the rear of the Prosbyters, and boing on neither the rignt or loft sido of the Thouso, it was impossible to toll with which party The acknowledged ad- crucifiod Lord. There were more male herents of tho cused woro on spectively s daring the othor scsslons, and both watohed the proceedings intently. Every ministor at questions—** Do you ginoorely reoeive and adopt oneor two-of lta doctrines woro oconberiiod.’ | #aving grace, and that” ropontance iso s » saving [ not m ma "Wk waw more, o' (Swing), hnd - votuall, | grace 4nd (st to'a Sow Lose s pomiels 8 gasdon by | Tricspendent ter il trying b, prave. thi . afiirmed in tho fact of thia molomp *declavation, | tueChristht spaterd,, . v Y71 |\Univatsallate wors .,v.mgafim.\ that the Prosbytorian Oburch vory dif- | Repontancel! mhving grace! now heart] pin T s 4% Citn | dohi wore howsoheld worda in evangoliosl fam- “formulated thevlogy. ‘Tha plen iof Prof.iBming | iisw, and thé ghople who llstencd to much-'ex- vim'-gpdrnlnlon hat he did finl oliava thé doo-. Conterslon of I' a4 contalning t! tho Word of God. . ! 4 shinn b o NEW AND OLD, BORHOOL. - omad..to differonces,- and ‘having ropson to'ha'| Fafths and ha \lft it for the Prosbyt Ho ind heard Jt sald moro.thau onde, and. 1t'| convoraans to aomb oxtout with Unitatiai 6huole | oide whdtiar Boos: agrc tog poon ot had boon intimated on tho floor of tho Prosby- |.0gy, and boing lod by.tho statomonts. of- -Prof, h 88 oxprossing hia bollof, and | ioal sonso, stom of ooicine tawght in | 110 anmeLorms, and thorefora might ba pa “knowlodge tha @ . natural and probable conscquono What * wonld - "bo the wnont the mind of an<unbinsed reador’? If 'hd had hover heard of Prof.Bwing, Would Ho think If ho had nevor heard ¥, Coliger,: would 1is not gathor the improasion thiat thoy wero in tho 8amo churoh? Did it monn anythin conld {t produce any other impression -roapoot-to-Robert-Collyor; and his congrogation,”| Gospol was tho Gospel,” thore ho rend tho Biblo aright -THERE WAB DUT ONB (10BPEN, and ho know of no * local Goapol, if{.‘m artiolo? nokagos by atmosphoric prossuro, [Prof.. (Pattdn harn read from o sormon of Dr. Ryder; in w! SraEo o ekt mhal Beor SRR 4 ugeligal,] . L kool ro! ydors : 6 -prensions niavor raisod the quostion a8 to whothor \meu?c wl on]lin}i:m D hond tlio: dosteinon: 1 would. provoke argumont; which-\otld.take up|. trinea of. the Proabytorian Ohurol,” or Jtake thé | thoy wore usod In_an evangolical or unovangol- | ‘tngir evangolioal impors.” Tho quontion wid not not knowing tunt the Unitarians unog wllnfllll'g" ho hhnkl them {n g‘m{z * gyangelical areonad | sonse, but.whothor Lio hold. thom- a&. they--wore- -==- = |-for nok-ralsing- the-inquiry. ~Bir, whor acdité- tnrmulntudwlnn m; .\gcn?.mmuu:r Oonmmfion of thing is sonn floating uro kopt free from myrhrgs amou by meang of pecullatly oon: o0dh of whioh doti tho Work of ' loaer Tho smallor ones_aro hand, 030 mon bolng ewmployed - for whoso tonuro of life, after thoy onter tho wo raroly oxcoeds fiftoen yonrs, atem of sowngo that Tarle han oarnod the o title of bolig ~theé “clenncat city in the world, * All tho solid mattor 15 utilizod and mado ho was s 'Prosbytorian of Dr. Patterson or n0far as ho - had “omitted to glvo distinct and tory whon-sitting In ‘its _deliborntivo sossions,y| BW Hg ou athor subjsots to tho prosumption that 1| pronouncad uttoranco upon thoso eubjects. that the issuo was ono . whioh involved ' tha dis-! auaslon of the quostions whicly 8 ! Tatlon of tho OI4 apd. Tha Honueed tho sope préach he di 4 _UNITABIAY THEOLOGY, tho Now .Hohool. Ho | thoy woild b6 apt to givo thoso statomonts Hitlo | particular attontion 40 1. pronched in this passago waa,. or's Gospel and his [Patton's pel woro the eamo, aud ho resented It a0 an in- sult. It was notso. nrevonuo to the olty rost on tho origianl cost of tha sowors, i, TIIF FAMINE IN INDIA, Tho socond specifioation wan so nearly like tho lnrgaly excooding firat thnt it wan nov nocossary for him to payany borgod to protost againat any much interprota- || ¥alio until thoy wero thoroughly sorutinizod. | ™ Frg hore road oxtracts from the scrmons on- ton of the course of, thio proasautor. If bo was || Thoy might be orthodox -or hotorodox; no ono | itled * A Religion of Words " and © Tha Valuo advised ,of the difforonca whioh dlvigod. the | know what thoy wore. , . of Yenterdny,” to furthor {llustrato tho dofend- . 'ml;h};: u'fl:;&‘ufihg}:s a"' ¢g- :gmrgnul or | [ But :om‘-’nm.au fato the Tsvs éfi muh, and core | mntls oquivoostiona.’ © "\ h involved such & discusalon. | Yeralon, and ropontance, and love, snd life, and of tho ¢ i3 ‘lxln Tomomborod ‘vory woll -that' Prof, Swing, | Divine ‘Lor, snd urion thee bo: carried by & now HORE' LIOITE YA A MODE OF VINTUE. . oL S S o + e i mblo of dootrincs. 3 s Wea'tho Goopel a mode of virtue? ' Did | 70 fA¢ Bditor of The Chicago Tribune: Oliristianity differ from tho tonching of Soorntcs Quznxo, May 8, 1874, Bm: Tho Bengsl famino. la undoubtedly ine NTED, b . rocreative i 1o orld called a no [At this moment:the room became so dark that 'I&nné;,e’;‘,fi;g,.“}'}{,mg‘},h:%) .4 ;N‘L}::""z—f;a‘;&{ Hoart Lioro—onilod Henvon Hoteatior, ™ | Prot, Patton could ot road, and ho asked if Lo boing an Old-School Pros and Marcus Aurolius- only in tho fact that Josun, taught a bettor virtuo? thing which differontiated tho Christi Not a3 ‘ho- took oroaing fn aron, - The doatha aro moro numor~ that tho | ous than will apposr by tho offfoial roturns j torlau, Tho ploahad | What did ho [Swing] moan? Ho ohallongod ( £ould bavos little moro light. Homa ane'on the tover wod dysontory, oto.; gotting tho oradit of Ho took 1t “that the 1o ralevanay, axoopt to anfing. the epmbiiiies ot any minlstor o Eldor fn tho_court to toll im | of romurked quite lond, thongh in au ;undor; 3 toune, ** He noeds it,"” wl men on the gronnd of paat divislon, Ho waa | WHAt that mosnt. or f obargod with ‘umtaithiulhoss 15 "hls: pasioral | , OUE fsra might welt mincl wih thowo of tho exileg | SFel Hiter among Piof. Swing's fiont Yotk and in his funations 4a » Ohrlstian minis | PXakerI¢ he bo penitont, and wo may any slong with 3 tor; with not sincoroly rovolving and adopting | Bl Wo siand tha Confossion of Faith as containing tho Bys- o tom of dootrino taught In the word of Gode charges which would hinve boen rolevant in any | will give you rest,” broken, and to us, no longer ablato | floation, ; A grent ‘donl, had- boi XIf the defonso quoted anything in reforence to | should want to atrike out .the, sneoifi much’ mortality of which tho primo cause la cortainly tha want of food. ~Dut the most alarm- Ing indlostion of tho presont hour is seenin tho olroumatsnce that tho Indlan Governmont +have .almost unoxpeotedly boon compelled to commenco gelling xico. and grain to doalers for ' tho supply of the poople, in addition to furnigh~ * Ang the mupplics for tho Inborers of tho Roliof diatinot. foaturo .of _tho wak the oxpiatory -dehth of i:’nt' "5 .x?oda of 'yl‘rhlo.'.‘ 2 rof. Bwing was ‘‘a mode of virtuo, difforod trorn the Gospol of Philadolphin, ‘and of Bt. Louls, and of Plitsburgh in that taot that {t was *'a modo of virtue and not s jumble. " b a8 fon- that - Plttaburgh, Christian syatom oroat thore was & I 7 f Jonus Christ, and clonds.]” » “Tho apeskor thon.reforred - torthe third specl- r off,” This Christ han fulfilled a P {hey ‘Said abowt 1t, flee unto ourselves and find :posce; He. says, *Como | nnd Brother Riddle wanted to demur bofors he unto me all ye that Iabor and aro hényy lades, and T | hind » chance to. He (Rddls) was a lnwyer, and ho (Patton) was tho moro surprised that ho. \t Ho lad & good opinion of .iho Now- | tho macrificial charactor of Obrist's denth, thiot | cause Le did not baliove n Aaying saythin Bohool Chutch™ na it oxiated boforo the | would be it : It was the only statoment ho could Ahouuc,imnn,whu w88 dwi._,mh’i??wuigoo Salvation of man, thorofore, must bo man’s trans- | fsfy the Qourt, and the! specification Works, and for tho froa reliof of tho weak and emaolatod. Ofiolal optimism nover likos to nd- mit tist it 16 takon at a disadvantago; but i Heronles " haa a Gog) ol .which amounta to % a umblo of doctrinos 2" Was that 8 kind thing | muxim on goneral prinolplos, bt 1t did not st~ y |to say of n oity which had #0 mych t'resbyter- ustifleation by faith,'stood upon the Nicono | formation f {nful to s oly natuse, Tt 1 - forrod oo facts, th '!h-nnd and would ‘have vindicatod as readily as | wurn of (hat which was 105t ‘Alo:nl‘:ll\;n“l‘(nn mny bo l:'[fnt;fi," ‘;1“3“,“; ':,r:: ln':-’unanl. vgo‘:fi.fi; :,31‘2,1,,.1'1 tho Od Soliool “tho dootrina thit it was througls | proliminary o a commitmont, bit cabnot, 1n mosla, tho precions blood of Olirist, and’ that. nmfi;, Lwocmn{!v\lfl‘wfi i : ; fixc&%ou that malvation wad socurod; and lio hoped the It thero was anyihing Ymmlnunt In ovangol- Loe an nrtioloin 4 lusnlt would uot be offored to that branch of tho | lcal theology, it waa that " pre ianism in it7 - Was o man soting in atriot loyalty to the Church andor whose baanor Lo profosaed. to-live, whon he mado - that rash and falso atato- mont with roforenca to Pittsburgh? Tho im-. usion producod by ib was thab rellgion was inig good—plantiog yourgelf upon the four men in nuthority do not monopolizo all the common sonso of tho world, and wo muy some- timos distrust thelr judgmont, while honeatly admiring thelr falthfuiness and vastexortions, Tho opHmlsm we 'sposk of I now employing’ rut, tho delivory of & lgoture in tho Mary for. Uhnflol; socond, the publication! v 0_Lakesida Afonthly ;. ho firat thing In walva~ (itho™ pronching of s sormon in eulogy Ghurchy and that, It it ‘wore, somo prominent |- thion was the . lof John . Btuart. Mill, ,.Fo-:was. sure brothor of, the former Now Holiool would stand |. ATONEMENT FOR BIN if there. wére any Unitarlans' prosent, “they tho 1saucs upon which the TIE INBULT TO THE PRESDYTERY, and passed it by ua of minor {mportancs,” - iindication of np) te; and roponting ng nothiug about doified Jesus pitintion for our ains through his blood. JOMN BIUADT MILL. . The spoalter thon rend copious extraots from | the Sormon on the| itaolf in ohiofly dwelling unon the doflolencton tn’ sud | tb5 transport servico, whilo making - somowhat light of the noed of roster llas. hivo onough for to-daye. Ry cortainly ; but, if wo ata to look forward to four'or five raouthe'o? doasth 3t the Preubytory woro propared to cogpt the | rn the fnanctal dopsrtment of lifa a debtor can be |inomination. - If- thoy wore: honost mon ¢ dodlaration of "tho Goneral Assomblios of 186 | savou Ly baving Lls debts pald, - Condomned to death |iwould eny, ‘‘You and I differ, dacidedly,”" aud 1870, and wore preparad to act upon it a8 | acrimiual can be saved by a loftor of pardon, having | causa bouwoety'tha - position of -Ohrist - | {the normon on *John Btusrt Mill,” published in [TE TRIBUNE of May 19, 1873, saying ‘diflioult Cto got."the” doctrine ‘o bofore tho end of the oalamit; cai bogi to bo disoernod, who oan doub, with tho Zosta with tha facta | the dootrinal basis, the aimplo quostlon bofore- | upon itths seal of o King ! but, in ~morals, n salvation |\jyre and- Obrist as God -the - difforonce’ wee in- | thom was, ** Hns Prof, Swiug contravoned the | 18 otaimply n dinchnrgo | Confassion of Taith, or violatod his ordination.| from s rom’s dobt or’an_oscaps already in the hands. of the will ba prossing neod for grain, means of moving Btenmora and Dary piblio, that thora ogleated to cultivate tho religions sontimonts; , 84 woll a8 for'tha 8 rdgloot oast~s shad ity bt h Change ti the. spirit, ansiiing. | finito, ' Bolivving that Ohrist wau God,he conld | 5 That siindow would have boon romoved if Lo 08 ara Leing furniabed from inot .consent ' to” havin, im ‘put upon & lower : Yows, 80 far as thoy Imply a barmony with the | 018 Vice tovirtuo. i i ? Confesslon of Faith?" ' I thoro ovor was a tuie' SIN-AXD HoLinEsh. e thac . ?c;i?&'.fi’efi-a':nwfiefimo.ay from 3f had, cultivated thnr‘lllmto tho oxtent of Viotor Britain t¢ - ¢l iotor Cousin know | may oxpect b 0 Indian rivors, o that wo ywhen the Prosbytorisn Church lind an_oppor- | AWl through Prof. 8wing's pronching the sn- |8 ol g A (™ 0 00’ that 11 !tunity of saying that'.ebo hnd drifted from hor | ‘tithosis was sin and holincss, - *You are bud, old wanorliga, int sho Delioyed tho Canession | A1, thorafore, made fo. suffer,, Do good .and- | of Faithi no,longer exprossed hor sontimopts—;| YOI Will ) bo “bappy." ~Noti ono word « abont jthatit was & doad lottor—it wad.when the rounion L 4 !took placo’;'and;for a ministorof ‘tho Prosoyterian | tho, vicarious stonement of Jesus Obiriat. Church, undor. igrave charges,” knowing “lus ra-" taok nway from.him,tha delty of . and I know not whoro.to find Him," \ may oxpect tho transport to improve: and what ly ask of our Amorican frionds the - subjoots and servanta of tho Enipire in keopiog a bright look-out for con- . tingont dangord, and, in consouauce with such * intolligont sympathy, to avail -themsolyes of tha earliost opportunitios of carrging in the Bup) J| about the Bible ? ‘| took: a. prominent part in the conduot-of tho Fortnightly Review, and wes & roprosontattvo of thot typo of philosophy. which-denied the funda- imentsl differenoos whioh exiatsd in rospeot to : John Btuart Mill was wo would principall; Swing kaow "ho | In to Kadly seunp. feringa wero sufficiont for ‘the' world, if ‘thoy .40 kindly nssint oxpiation for s brokon Iaw and pardon through | Should ssys i You havo takon awsymy Lord, | To show tho oquivoonl maturo of thoge | 118 approoiated tho charactor of the Unitarian: sponsibility, o stand up: nad say-in tho faco of | Btatements, Prof. - Patton -Toad from n | —tholr scholarship.—and ho was as willing aa thoso doglarations, that tho Presbytorian Ohurch | Unitarien ' book ontitlod . * Orthodoxy ; ‘no longer bellaved tho Uaufusniony:l Falth, was | Its: Tentha and. Errore,": bli James: Froemon an fosult to sho Proabyterian -Church, and, It | Olatko, aud ho olalmed that Prof, £ : thoy were loyal Presbytors, thoy would resont Is i menta, as far g hé reforred to tho doctrinos in mind and mattor, and right and wrong—verities whioh woro presumed aud takon for granted in i Prof, Bwing .also kuew that John Stuart Mill attaoked Bir William | we Homilton's philosophy, hocauso it was the bul- from the rogions of tho Paaiflo, that Northbrook and : his advigora will The dotails from the theatro of cek to woek, aro oxcoodingly int mey well find thoeir place amon, ‘any man to admit and to recognize the eervices 3heyhml rundoxf‘m{hv.hol nnumi of mtmn!tln ix:‘ numfin . | departmonta of cological vontigation. He of: Bwing's state- | \ok'not unmindtal of the labors -0f ‘Larduor in Toligious discusaion, your important on the epot, . {Smilos on o otk | oo usstion, woro capablo ot bulng aonetruad . an tho old country and -Norton in thig, but bolioy- THE FIRAT SPROIFIOATION, . : 5 Tha sposker then gonsidored the first speoifi- | Ar. Olarke’s work sustained that view. wark of intentioualism, and until futentional- ed; aonsational and matarfal- make no headway, - He also t itoms of news from tho worl nitarion sonso, and_that the quotations from | P4 that Josus Olirlst’ was God,—Presbyterisug zoepootfully yours, clieved that, being Giod, He basamo man; Tnoy | ianoould be destra ist philosopby conl Hexny HewanNa, by derived thoir hope of Heaven from the union of tion unde ok ol ¢ WAS THE PRESDYTERY WILLING iomned dla ot 1 iy e alloged that tho ;| 10 ¢ on rasord as AaTing Huatsaan was falth- | O facts, . From tho fack that Howas msn, they : bolioved st Ho' could_be -in_sym; aud unoquivocal statements of oortain dootrines | ful in malntaining tho trutha of tho Goupol who, | PNET R B0 SOTIE, B0 B, & o e it was proved, during tho . courso of his publio | biom, tako thoir lowar place, eatiufy U ,Lu,dlfi’.““fi"éfiféfifi'a" h"';““o,,”fl";f%“,.."é,m“‘fi ministiations, or 8t losst in tho sormone published | Of the law and provide. whoreby, attomptod to destroy the principles whiol lie the-foundation of Ohristianity and .of all reli ion, snd nover was & greater insult offored. Jouus Ohrist, navorwas a greator insult offered tho Presbytorian Church, nover did & man mies —_— MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS. od could ba 1o2auaro-tood shoos aro again coming into fash-: K t and ]\u;tlly tho ‘ungodly. “They belloved | Punishimont,” " The Personality of tha Spirit,” | ©ver his namo, had novor smd n solitary syllable | JuS I “Fio Trinity,” and Tho Fall nf San T1t.cht.| to sok him off {rom the Unitarians, and to prove %fig‘;‘w‘;“‘,‘l‘:fi, i potrion Yo of out that, when ho did Tofor to those dootrinos, | ti8t be bolioved and set storo by, and was, will- ¥ e usod equivooal language which was capable | 108 to stake bis lifo upon tho cardinal dootrine of & coustruction in Barmony with Usitariay | Of Salvation through tho propltiation of Jesus | People. hoy. could .not rogard a greator opportunity for defending the truth na in Josus, and nover did ho fail to disoharge the duties intrusted to him more ithao when David Swing rose in hio pulpit and proached a 'l sorman, tha effact of which upon the minds land mourns the possession of 6,459,881 ° + —Hore's progrosd. A Troy finn shipped th: tons of papor collars to Now Zoaland 1;‘:& wuol::m died In Winchester, ivould rflq;rfl it aa standing in the placo'of His’ s Chriat?- ‘Ho was willing to boliovo that the | Créaturo. Ta dony tho delty of ‘Christ .was o B e, O o A | iy " "aont s o sa | S U oot skt ot e oty o oballonging it,—that thoy did not contain any oardinal doctrines to pass no such voto as would | & ma “: finn ‘wfi 't?" lm;flmmr 2 distinct and unoquivocal statomonty with ro- | Acquit Prof. Bwing.of those grave chargos, It | FEOUny \bas Lie propitistion of Hie cross cin ! . thero was nrything true in the Drenbytorls apoct to tho dootriugs mamed. % Tho porson | {i was Hiat tus deley of Ol who - listonod be no other than to produce tho improssio it wan ‘not suoh & bad thing to bo Juln Bty Millattorall, (Applauso from tho right.] ABUSING THE STANDARDS. . Tho fourth -spocification wais “then taken up., H It nlloged that Lrof, Swing had spoken in doro- |'f on Baturday waok, ty-one ohildron, . —A Yuria_shopkeoper di “Tho man with the fork! -swallowed was lio was tho mothor of nys this sign: sya- | 11is offdring Himsolf up to satisfy divide jus- ho farkl 'Iho ouo that ho ividod fho | tioo: . Part company: with: the deity of Christ, i A ,nTml:udwlfi?:l b all n a dram-shop, loavii Py "l s money ‘bis wife to starve to monnt. Thoy bolievod. that Ohrist. : was | World Ioto o homispheros just as distinotlyas | 80 they wonld pronch suother Gospol altogoth- bt er. Tho Unitarians know- that; an 3 ! tho equator diyided tho earth. And woro the r Py gm"“i,od“}"’ jtaman ithal s rguut%tmgoxng tosny that & man was faithful | Honost in tholr posltion, ns ho was & Honeat f ity ! ° | wio wor ; Big fordination, answorod i tho aflrmative tho | S0 of miniuiira. goulatl et o exborl Ao WisELY 0 B8 GLATIED critoleo tho condtt of £rof, vidg. Ho yoa thing if, in the vourso of their pronching, thoy | by men’ who oarried on their bruuors an im- e um‘xs 3 Yo i did not somohow, have & suntenae to the effact | poachment of the royalty of Josus Christ, and to X TRATIO! tho Gonfossion of Faith of this Ohurch, taining the systom of dootrine tanght in the “Do you promise to b zaalous aud faithlol in maintaining the truths of the-Gospol, and tho purity and. peace of the Church 2" and, “Do you engage to be faithful and diligent in the exerciso of all private and oflleiad dulies, as bacomos you as & Christian and istor Of the Gospel 2" i _LACK OF ZEAL AND FIDELITY. X Prof, Bwing was charged, in the firat placoe, to the offect that ho had not boen soalons nnd faith: 1n} in mainuining the truths of the Gospol, and bad not boen faithful aud diligent in - the exer- blic dutios of lis-offico as such 'his first charge was. sot forth. in. twonty-four spocifications, and tho object of & specification should bo olearly understood, - Bup- ose, in gonoral terms, tho clarge was that, ho ad not béen ** faithful in maintaining the trutha of tho Gospel,” .and that nothing else was sai well havesaid: ‘*Tn what have I boon unfaithful? Where have I violated How is it possible for ‘mo to' dofend myeolf sgainst an issuo g0 There was littlo occasion for lovity, and the still- Tosa was broken but throo times by thié spplause of the proscentor's frionds, the argument being dryoer than awork on motaphysivs. . After sponding a few moments in silent prayer, the business of the day commenced. * LENGTUENING THE HOURS.. Mr. Thompeon snid it was very avident, if the trial was to be ended this week, longor sessions than four bours must bo held, moved that the Prosbytory eit from.- D:80 0 12:30 p. m., and from 8 to . m..- ‘The motion was agroed to. . TIE CONTINUANCE QUESTION. Mr. Watking, from the Committ to give roasona for declining the roqucst of the prosecutor for a continuance, roported back tho recommittod report with a few slight changes, and it was ndopted. ' The report hns beon hore- toforo published. TLSTIMONY OF MR. WAITE. Mr. Johnson then read tho fo] Tho Commitice ippointed to i renson for the Presbyters’s action in rolation fo the teatimony of 1, ¥, Waite, Esq., submit the following ; 1, an cccloatastical “conrt of ‘ten, ad in the prescut case, poruins to matters of religious opinion, and even o the jmpressions made by public services, It is, therefore, not possiblo to corifino tho testimony on eithor side striotly witnin tho techpical rulés of ovidence thal are enforced, in tho urisdiction of the oivil courts, But esyocially is this o 0 -accused, who in permitted to roduco any testimony that Lasa direct or indirect caring upon his exculpation, The judicatories of fur o8 wo . aro o alwayn In such caso almed .at substantinl "equit technicalltics, an {his Presbytery, in adjudicating the presont question, 1ins permitted the protecutor to make charges snd to introduce testimony that woulil not for s moment bo admitted fn a civil iribunsl, 5 The charges aud many of the mpecifications takes vory wido range, and the rebuiting. testimony could 1ot bo fulrly restricted, excopt by tha imit aiready in- dicated nnd already uccorded to the prosecutor, o rule of our Ghwrels hus been produced to require. Holy. Boripturos 2" He, therofore, the accused might vo) my ordination vows? ucstion so broad as this," _Thorofore, in order that he (Bwing) might be advised of what it was intended to prove, the ftoma_In respect to which . liis unfaithfulness was found wore aot forth. thaae were true, it would soem to folloyw that it wad the duty of the dofense to reply to the spooifications, aud to answer tho obargo either by proving thiat tho faots alloged had nover ex- isted, or, existing, did not constituto an offense. 1t would not do for the defouso to undertake tho disproval of the chargo in goneral terms, by prov- iog that Prof. Bwing had beeii faithfuland zoalous in respoots other thau those sot” forth in the al- lagation. ‘They might prove that Lo was exom- plary in bis private lifo. That had not besn uestion, ” Thoy might prove that he large congregation. e a statoment of The judicial action uo on tho part of th That bad never ! ‘Ihiey might show that on Wod- ‘neésdhy night hia services woro of an evangelical olinracter. Who had said tho contrary? The specifications wara true or they wers not,_ If true, they did or did not. sustain tho chargo Undor ench of shom_arose two questions : 88, ation proved ? If it was, did 1t constituto suoffonse? Those wero the issues bofore the Court, aund, if distinctly in the mind of the he would_raise the question asto what which it was to bo docided whether tlie allogations .did coastitute offensos. Clearly, what was an offense in one Church might Bot bo an" offenso iu anothier. ‘It was not an offonse in the Mathodist Church to revile the doctrine of prodestination; - h fonse in the Baptist Church to spesk alight~ of" infant * baptiam, . &ny portion of testimony, Under e wccordod many rigts Lhat sro not grauted to ths prosecutor. In 1 Greenleat Ev,, Scc, 89, p. 74, we find the fallowing: ! Evidence of other Jangnagé spoken or written by the_ defendant ot other.tim #, ia adwmissible, under the gen- in proof of W.ie spirit and intention of the 'asca of this sort, therefore, instead of boing excoptions to ' the rule, f4ll strictly within i :{nu, ll Dr:s;l:llmlf, Oha) ;i’d" Sdt:; ‘){,05:" It Inxi!,l . 8, 80, from 41 8 O lence,” vol. 3, page 627, Soc, 7 1, that whomever in'a wrill hese may bo mmado clearer by parol evidence, it is sl Boo also 1 Greenteaf, Chap.’ 1, Soo, e road I Groenleaf, pago 63, Seo, &1, us - 19 nob mecessiry that the dence ghould bear directly upah tho isiue, It i, admisaible if it tends to movo the lsauo, or constiiute o link in the chain of truth, altiol not justify a verdict in accordance nocessary that 1ta rolevaucy should appear at tho time when it {8 offered,"” This principle.is clear); cablo for the defensn a3 for the prosecution, . 3, Now thirdly, the soversl motiona of the prosecu- pplication of the foregolug was tho standard b3 nor wasitan of only not ' bolieved by those _denominatious, But positivoly denied by them. Ittwasan offenge to rovile the doctrino of predestination und to enk slightingly, of infant baptism, bocause oo doctrines entered iuto tho very life of ‘Presbyterinnitm. Ienco aroso fhe quotion of, *WHAT WAB THE STANDARD OF PRREDYTEBIANISM ? Happily this was & quostion i referonce to which thero was no doubt, If tho Presbyterian Chwirob were called upon to vate on, orto an- wwor tho quostion, ' what ata your, landards P -abe would roply, * The Westminator Confession of Taith, the Larger and Bhortor Cateobjsm, thio Yuspired Word of God.” ¥ . S ito ucé thnhl’relzikyteriun l(_len{Iclx ‘\;,l! X 5tos ontifled with adherence to the Wes : maibigtar Confomson of Faith, aud, even though | He 1 lof: & mortal only, the Loart Tobbad of tho | why-did ho not ssy “I bolleve Jesus Olirist hag | What he had said on tiioflaor of the hougs, and .| trines of the Church; and with somé knowledgo | {he glory of God was onco scen, aud whory' | n true body and-a roasonnblo soul " Why did | afterhis Jmh“o act of fellowship with the Unit after haying” glven thom . s moral ugh alone it might 'glhlt. Nor l.l‘ll tor ware denled in 6 firat motion was deniod beesuse the testimon; of {ho defense was not conflned to Bpecification b, anil, 11 1 bad beon, evidence of other language spoken at ofhior times was admisaible on that {ssue, tho burdon proof resting on the prosccution, 1¢ 5o bappenod unfortunatoly at bne period that she dlvided, each compauy toolithe game Con- fossion of Falth, and when, in' the process of time, it soemed wiso that the separated compee nios should come togotlior again, they (cawe’ to~ othor on the'baals of thio Coufeysion of Faith. o would not tako up tha.time by reciting the hustory of the Prosbytorian .Church during the _|. yagrs of division, but’wished ‘to'call attontion to tha fnet that novor, on” ono side or the other, | hiad it boen supposed that the Church was drift- %' 1 ing from bor anchotege, or losing her hold npon tho Westminstor Confession df I'aith, In proof he road from ‘tho progeediny al Augombly of 1808 tho i PROPOSED TERMS OF UNION * ‘upon which the rounion was, to Lo effectod, and 5, Which {8 the basisupon which bu s . erangelical charnotiy of tho reapondents Bosides, tho charges snd uj nd expressly carry the court back to the year A, D, 1887, eapeciaily Spocificationn 2 and §, Charge second, 2,"The second motion was denfed, because yritten sermons are not necessarily the only primary evl~ donce, " Buch documents, are 'not in ‘the. nature of wrilten cantraots duly executed, Thoy are‘iere speaker's memorauda, from whioh ro or less in tho d oations are general, ifersd tho bont evildence, beciusa Prof $ib sxtraordinury cironmatances of tho socloty When oy had o howsoof worship f thatr own, proichd to. ery ‘miscallancons congregations, a Jurgo porion o whom might, in lia jud, bo apocially benofited Johocal als B inied o thete tats of minge hp inay therefore have ro-. irictly. doctrinel teschings coblo 0. s Wednesduy a4 purtlal unboliovors, aud most of h‘h hl‘nfll‘o L benefit of s own :I::,:?na' l:cl:lrt!. _Heeldos, tha entire impressious of 3 ne respeols b‘uuv-:r-1 :lvkloncn ‘aato thie ovangulical character even of en ser- Hions, thius tha sormons themelves would ba It road ina critjel spirit, and under tho Moroovar, #t.would fhis body a1l the sermons alag the followiny it wae offeoted.:. . | L, E .. 'Thé feunlon shall b effectod on the ddotrinal and ‘ecclesastical bakis of our commonnatandards, e Sor} fiires of tho 0Id and New Tostamenta rhall be soxuowl- pired wora of God,yand tho only ih andpractice, The Gonfeaston of Faith aliall continue loba sincerely rocoived und sdopted a4 contuining tho systeny of doctriuo tsught in th loly Boripturos, nud the goveramont and diecipiin of the terlan'Churcl: in the United Statos shall bo apa provod as contuining the principley and tho rules of xogular hodrers, are in edged to bo the fna ufullible rule of fn arge of radical defact oF erzor. impracticable to_zad to of Frof, Bwing delivered duriug & perlod of two yeara nnd a balf, Ioorder to dotermine the point at freue, tho dsfondant may produce such & caso, the burden of yroof of course Lolng upon th 3. Tho third motiou was denl: Tourth motion wis deniod for the x statod under tho eecond motion. 8, Tbo 1l motion was denied for all tho ressons d, cifully submitted od (orm;lu rossons | .This plan of rounion was submlitted tothe Progbytories nud 1% mot with theirapproval, and tho cousummation ‘of tho satlon In the subsa. quent year waa ot forth in a deols was adopted unanimously, TUE OINCAGO PRESBYTENY, o Pronbytory to call in question o Tronbytorlan Oburols of the Unitod Blatos? - Was it proparod to tako aotion whichi would be doflant of the doolaration of the Uouoral Assembly, wheraby the Confossion of to bo_tho basis of the dootrinal standards ? ''Tho Prosbytory listened 1o the asoused, sud gave soma indfcationof ap- ‘proval, not in its corporate_capacity, but by tho aration, which 1. W, PAvrenton, he wisdom of ¢ Fianows A, WipoLE, "The report wan adopted.. REVISION OF THE DISOIPLINE, reuonted the following : Tresbylery of Uhlcago heroby overture tlie General AusemUly ta ‘{nitiate measures at for the rovision of the Preabytety does not deem it suy olhier Feasona than the noces- of the book for such revision, b, er hoped speoial oare would be taken Faith was' doolarod meceaary to refor ta Avident on thia face ploa of Prof, Bwing, when he admitted that ho tha exporienca of ) ‘wan not in accord with tho Oonfession of I'aith, that he hied sotually departed from it o farag | gatiop , of tho “standards of the Presbyterinn ' Church and the doctrinen taught theroin. A man : entered tho church of his own:freo will. Hoe was not asked to como in, or to’ ata; n,the ground thas he sincere] ogtrine of tha Church, And just boen convicted of manstanghtor. nel Levy, propriotor of .the v Lina presionted tho Duiko of o dessort Borvico twoen 8,000 and n! in, but cama in.| Edinburgh, a8 a wedding elioved” the | of molid gold. Its value t:was common | 4,000 gubiess. 3 10 2 ¢ o 1o should not be reprosented in -tho that Obrist God, or that Ohrl . | bo clidmed without _distingtion? Did thoy con. | 80d hoped They ould x';'u‘fgnnnd_a":m::nuo in .:n;' 'of Brof, | eider o mon faithfal to his ordmation vo\vg, Whe | morning ns having compared o Unitariau with sn 8wing's sermons 1n which he. apoko of .the man | Btood all tho timoe in the position of guli;mc M{cfi‘m‘, orof Jesus Ohristas God. They A PERPETUAL EQUINOX, eliov 13 2N B ' wnd Ta, ;ll’! "c'fi'fix'fi‘fi?fm. h"wharnby he | Bldo or the othor, They knew that fact, aud it lionesty, a fundamontal prinoiplo of common in- togrity, when ho was-uo louger in with his Oburch, to leava it like a m: Swing awed bis, position, in great .part,to the fact that ho was an honored man in the Presby- terian Church. Ho preachod to a congrogation which-worshiped ins church that had received | 'ds exprosslons of afloction from the Presh; itor who made Gen. Butler's jn- flammation of the bowels read ‘*inflation of the bowels” -ahould rely more upon the individual words and "loss upon the contoxt.— Worcesier —Tha compos Athoist, bocause ho was not golng Lo do it.. But.| ; 2 dupposo an Athoistic Bocloty were to organize, slways crossing tho. lin, and. nover. belng fa n | 3nd wors to proposo tho erastion of a Hall; tha A i they latendod to dedicate it to a docoased position whero, 1t could be said he wau on one of ‘the speaker's,—a \noblo Christian,—aud should come to him and say, **\Wo are golug ~—Joff Davis attonded a rocent oaf and dumb children in o e nation of TLond b Granvillo intradnoed him a8 & aiHooa ek poraunded ~and - fnyited ' thom to'[ Wadunmocdssury for bim to prove it It would | §0% i hie® 1all “ana” wo . aro gols- i Cbraco. Josus Ohrist. &a Ho was. fracly-| b0 80 insult to tho intolligance of tlio houso to offored them in the Gospeli' Thoy could not fin k) that dootsiuo in sny of Frof. a;mg'u sermons_|: theological posilivn. Tardly a dail oF "TEF | course they would mot aay that io s Y distinguishod rm hmunlrgot the —Bir Georgo Tlliott, who has beon mades Qhurch tiroughout the land. Ho was in of &' congregation who supposed that he | mothod of thoir education,” was in sympathy with the doctrinos of the Pros- . © Buat,” boing in that position, B O it i o | dodicw.e It to your friond snd our friend.” Wa Siukes. ¥hio wishod tolnfg aro short of funds. and you'are popular—of byterian. Churc] “Thioy would find " rogoneration,” but that conld [ but “sfirmed in. . hla Bohulr, U0 | [Laughtor] and wo wan you to doliver.s loc- ho.found in_any Unitaian book. - They belioved \Gas away the —old dootrines in the dootrinoof Baronet at the instance of Mr. Dieral, is the largoat colliory-owner in the world, and is oxtens in_telographio ento was ono of the capitalists who aidod ing and Inying tho first Atlantio oable, “honored as he is, trusted by his brothron, was 1t right for him to_use the apportunitios he had of the standards and ridi- culivg the faith which he had aincerely promised to belleve and the truths which he had upon which they pinnod their faith, aud which |.turo and holpus out.” Now, if ho wers.to oy sogardad oo sital, Not s momibor of tha plond the fact that, this'athoistio hall waa erooted | 1 shng, for doridin ETERNAL FUNISIIMENT ; - . in memory -of -a*decensed friond; for whom ho thit there waa toho n Al Jadgmant, and thi, Dronby Lery Tt Lo boen troublad by bis | B0d. the Hignoat rogord, and whose Oliistisn nua Judicial aot, God would plinisi ¢ho wiokod | g¢ gxpromaiont. As long oo an 1807, & friend of | ClRracter was boyond roproscty would that bo Brownsville, Tox.,. employed & If ho was guity of ri Moxican to transport 810,000 in siiver from Bal- To) in_an overlusting punisbmont. Ho could not | proe Bwing wrote of him, His dubious state- | A3 eXcuso for londin i name and intlucnca. Holp it if that doctrine aronsed unplensant feol=. | s~ epuso ns groab. troublo, and wo do not and” doriding, tillo o Brownevi to n soclety, of .atheists? If. it was wrong atill in Moxico, en r Whilo tho messonger was onte for Brownaville, he waa inge. It was in the Confonsion of Faith, and he 5 for Prof. Bwing to give his name aud influonne olvod. It bo irus, Hhar, Howavor, S not o buk Lo il nforce the Prosbytory to bring | o Gnitarinnism, St was not tho loas wrong bo: the qnastion ho was considering, but W in the Confession of Faith, was the Presbytory to pass it over as m light offensa? Were they | but b fou; going to put the chargos out of court as friv- y dosporadoes and severoly wounded, ht his way back to Drol{nnvfillc an other 1t | iio had ‘stood {n the community aa a representa- |, C8u8e the socioty in whose bolinlf ho' lectured dolivorod tho milvor to his employor, waa there. They could not find that doctrine in ‘wag about. to ereot @ -chapol in-memory’of a Fror. Bwing's sormons, - Thoy heliovod n. | sk Frosbstorlanism, ead whose oplolon was | 50utuyluom ho admirel, and whoss Ohdiersn | e * TRINTTY - y Shat there was one Gad—that there were . thrae | o appear g an spologlst for Prof, Swing's porsons 10 the God-head, the 'same in substance, o v A oqualin powor and in . glory,” That “daotring E:fluél;:qflé{ll of preachiug, 8o far a8 Lie avolds a clear A charactor had nover boen 1 dispute, SR TAEAL 8o that the question revorted to olous? ‘Were they going to pass & resolution the prosecutor to' withdraw the They- would not. -It they did, he on the night~ following, whore the -silver was stored, and stole all thoslivor ho could —A correspondont writes an laco in Colorado Canon, called Eoho When a gun is dircharged, total silonco " ho ontored the house killed the ownor, I i e Tollows of n colo« -IMPEAUR PROF. SWING BEFORE THE EYNO! hother It was Hght, for & Broabyterian miaist vocal ststoment of - to contral doctrigea of | Whothor!t waaright for » Bresbytertan minlster, | 00 o aach the Tresbyters fax i could not 'bo found in’ Prof. "Bwing's sormons. | Evangolical Clristianity, il preaching sooma to me | With the'vows of a~Prosbyterinn ~ minister upon Xt was alludod to—ridiouled, spokon of oqulvo-. | sorioaly defactise. : cally, but he defiod them to find the doctrine in > LET TIM SPEAK OUT fdality. [Hisaos on the loft.] 7 Tho undsunted proseoutor then wenton to od.| prova the fourth -allogation, roading oxtracts follows tho -report startling auddennoss, at & groat distanco—f : for & moment; then, with 1m, Laving promised to bo- faithful and zealous tha &cho s hoard, seomin in maintainiog the truths of the Gospol, to givo five miles to the sou thosormons. Thoy belioved in' tho “fall of ‘| rn tha face of that testimony, of tha lettof writ- | bis -publicinf tiongs, to hava his iame assooiat; mon "—tbat all sinnod in Adam, and foll with | ton by Mr. Trowbridge, and the ovidenco of Mr, | from dsy to day in bim in his transgression. Find that doctrine in —whence 1t comos ba from a dozen .sermons, which ho considored ag ey . roverberations, as'if loa; conclusive;and- also’ from Tthe Digest, to- show- thiat bis viows were sustaindd by tho docisions of | Louder and quicker grow: ho publio press, with an en- n separato and distinct Young, who testitled that Prof. Swing -admitted | torprise- which had for its gole ob}uct_nm ereo- ping from glen to glen, 8, the sound, until ap- Prof. Bwing's sormon | * They could not do it,’ | to bim'that he was claimed by the itarinus, | tion of o chapel in which the only Gospel preach- and bo dofied them to do it. yflu would not n8Kk ,:\',d lg‘fln"{:xmzr faat that Mr. “(n; .d:fl&;;l:“; ed would bo one deriding the deity of the-Lord the Moderator {f it waa not n strange thing for a | the floor of tho Prosbytery that he was claimod | Josus Christ, aud calling in quostion His co-ater- Proabyterian miniater to preach to & Preaby: | by them, and -that Mr. Thompson went to him | nity with the Fathor. Was it rlfiuti -That wag terisn cougrogation, and _publish & sor-'| and advised him to bo more oxpliclt, and roman- | the quostion, and he would ta! the Genoral Assembl, parently dircotly opposito, 0 P LI T T s s U T tho Presbytorian form of government that doo- trmal truth was of great importance, and that formulnted trath was nocessary to tho existonco of & rollgibus donomination. - Prof, Bwing had when a fult volumo 0n_orice moro the echo 'ym tho snapping of o oap, far to tho 6 the responsi: ° —Auother horrible scene i n tha British Royal mon oyor his - own namo—nllawtog , it | gtrated with hin in respect to the doubtful -doo<'| bllity of anticipating the vote of+the bad; to go “out as ropresonting’~ his ' own |'trine, Ho (Patton) asked ifit was right for him | They must answer it catogorically, for upon tho mind,—without a solltary naked roferonce to tho (fl\vlngg to be silent and romain in & doubtful po- | roply thoir vote would dopend. Prof. Bwing dogtrines which woro cardiual to the Ohristian | gition 1 The Duchoss of Edinl royvad the Priucoss of “In yeturning thom she pi contravoned that laid . hLiwself blo | knowladge' _of TProsbytery would bo derolick if thoy passod it by rinciple, and, having dono 5o, Walon "é';'.‘.'é‘m’"“’hg"" ng-irons, ronentod tho hot gnda tg Was it not his. duty.to avow-himself— | Would answer if, but not ss the Presbyter: Her- Royal Higlinoss, who thouglitlensly took mllglnnb snd constitutod 'the foundation upon | to stats his views on thoso questions? Ho-| would, and he would : vindicate himaolf witl which with an acquittal, . Ho (Swin Lold of them, and thon waltzed around with ono ad 60 traduced, 8o i th suled, und. Ty | Laud bevween: hor knoen for acvoral minytes ba hristianity rosted. Ho did not wink to, |’ (Patton) had listened to Lis plon, anxious that | & boldnes which thoy. would not follow. They ba understood as saying that there was'no rofor- snmuthln§ should.be said which would relleve .| might acquit him of ha,nhn'su‘i aud soy that ho onco to them in langunge which unpracticod oars | the trouble of his mind ; but'when tho reading | Wn8 not wrong, but thoy woul might onll these doctrines, because he intended | was goncluded o : ‘quoting from soms of the sermons . ° o TUE BTRONGEST PASSAGES ° that could be found,—and passnges which the | oution, it waa then—believing thal -the “Prosby--| good as ours,” 1oto sho could Bpenlr. Eye-witnesses of the oo- “tho tiatingnishing doctrines of tho Prosbytorian | Sutrence oxpress thelr buliof that the daya of the * Church, that tho effact of such lnnguago upon | Husslan Empire are numberod, the minds of those who heard. him bg to bresd skepticiem in rospect to them, and load ‘the learors ' to, treat' thom 'with o 8o in the teogh_| irony and inginustion, 5o alluded to,tho vit; of conscionce, and not_tako the'position Prof, | 7 "RE pEur a8 pEWTDERED A8 BEFORE. Bwing afirmad 1n Lis ploa—that -tho Unitarisus 1t he had ever had reason to carry on the prose- | *have = version of the Gospol which is not so Em ey . ... Sapphires in Oolorndo. The Donyer (Col.) NVetws of tho 3d inst. Eldors of Frof, Bwing's church’ in thoir tosti- d ight inal ig hat Having planted theraselves upon the positios mony sot forth a8 toashing those doctrlnas in {ffi;‘}‘;‘:{wfifii{.’flf B o et Yo | ttint tho Cioopel waa identifled Wik tho Tayally o unequivocal terms, to show tho difforenco’ bo- | (Swing) had, upon the foor, insulted tho Proaby. | Jesus Christ, they could not .tsko. Prof, Hwing's_ tweon thoir and his construction of & statoment.. | torian Ghurch {y ,.y[ng that ho hnd doparted | vosition. Tho two wora very difforout. - There Tho howl of wild bessts died sway from {hoe amphi- | from the faith of tha Thin could not . bo TIE ACQUSED DEFTANT, ing had come into court, and sald s “A miner who has beon engaged for some months past worklug In the bars along the Platte for flye or aix miles abovo Donver, had the good 1 confess T | fortune to find sovoral sapphires, which Lo saved without 'knowing anything about . thoir valuo, Oneday lagt Woelk, & strangor who was prospoot- ¢ | contompt.! ‘hurch, and undortook to | #a8 not & minister or eldar.in the house who, odistinot Ianguago. T adum language ought not to have fallen from my lips.’ Now that T have been remindud of it, I am sorry thoatra whon thia ruls wan spoken by tho Bavior, * load o Prosbytorian Ghuroh to o confossion of | if ho knew somo dear friond did ‘not*beliove in Unpractised cara might say that moant salya~ | faith which he had formed. v * the doity of Jesus,aud in tho Trinity;wouldnot foel tion. TRO. BWING'S TLEA. that bis oul waa imporiled, Prof. Bwing said ing dowh all idols, an ing along the river, was shown tho atoncs, when that I usad it, and promise not to do 5o fn- the | ko bought the largest ono far $2. ° Ha broughs " timo -to--come,” ho imagined the Prosbytory chirlat, in pnfolding the charaoter of God, in toar- | | Tho apenker thon took Prof. Swing's ploa and | **I do not regard the delty of Chiriat cssoutial fo ‘wauld Layo folt differont upon tho matter, I filling the Universo with ono | dlaseated it, .~ He (8wing) said thora wera cer- | 8alvation,” - but vlanted himfolf on the' brond pronounced ‘s "sapplit splrit, infnite and” Blessed, hna domon work that |'tnin dootrines upon whioh ho waswilling to meet | Pintform of Christian charlty,, ln% while bp ad siould bind il upon the forohoad and heart of mun. |- tha gkoptioal world,, . That was, nob the ques- | Mmitecd that the. Prosbyterians ho That was s sentiment any “Unitaridn ‘would'| tion, but * who doos he beliave,” indorse. =11 2 anid by.: his - -friends, ' that” len | 8dmission. . _ .. \lo-hands of T nberi, y @ cut. . Tho rough stone weighod - nineteon and a half oarats, aud: yosterday ho dolivoredto tho ‘owuor o bosutifully out gem ab ‘had a better ver- t wag | 8ion of tlid Gospel thanthe Unitarians, 1 tl{nt‘ qnly ¢:alil £ niot . but wont on and mada still- more 'insulting ones Lot us appronch now a mors warmly disputed propo- | was. ‘meant ae .a oatogorioal = ailirmatlon |~ | 1% APFINED TIAT THEY NAD A GORPEL, aitfon, u.«:pmo divineness of Cliriat ’1- nopmvlhhr"m ‘e': q: his bfim. l.lu (Patton) flid nolt deny. thnuto['; Ho toolt issue with kim, with all due respec sontlal 1n tho Olrlstansystem, The Trinity, as for- . Terly slated, cannot M“""mmwi Nan hag ot the: | A8 H0oRUE for that, but it was not a cntégorion power {0 tasle the thrceuess of one, nor the oneuess of ot to tho doctrines of the Churol thorefrom, weighing full twelve carats, and val- leve that tha Prosbytetian | ued at 8400, Thoamninor was also: in 3 torday, dnd bocame vory ‘muchi nstonished upon leariiivg the value of tho - pobblo ba had parted _to'the Unitariaiis, vpon, that point ; aud such an afirmation of his .baliof, and" not auoh a. state- | admission of ftsclf disqualiflod a mau from bo- TNFANT DAMNATION, thros, aud gce that it {8 * good.”_ Ban cannot do 1tls | Tént as the Presbytary was entitled to have, |ug & mintstor i""g"d‘l A0 sogulas™ standivg in wUI™ hero and “Lnow of tho doctring whethar it be | Howeyer, grang that it was, what:was it?. What | the Prosbytorian Church.. . for God,” It s not concelvablo thut suy one will pro- | wore the ductrines? *Tho_divinity of ‘Christ.” How could Prof. Bying go with for & 82 groouback, with MMr. . Haberi. and .proposes : to - .en; somo of tho_.profita ,.of suto, Prof; Bwing had not tried to He lofs two mora If any improssion © hid Unitarian | produce_tho improssion, svan “produced upon “the public mind by his toud to havo oxporiouced three porsons as bolug ous | What did he moan by that ?... The Universaliste | friend and say, * My,doar friond; yonr soul jsiin and | person, the samo in wibslatice, aud at tho Bamo time | 1)gligved in the. * divimty of GLuiats® wo did Uni- | peril; youlmust boliove -in-tho'doity of ‘Christ.” o yolishing,: Tho 'gontlomsn " whio Hought tho ploa,. it ' was that the "Presbyterian Oliurch, Pt mBniiansde | Stono ; oiteneuce; Chrlstlunlly boars euldily | turians, Thore was:a world of difforcrice be- | Ho could ot dait. I thoy held tho.views, thoy | eithor fo" “hér*' formulated qual, ., . the idea of three ofilccs, permils.the ‘eus God to appasr in Father, or {n 8o such;things, thongh: a- comparat: oF 1 Bpiries bug | bween éOurist.ia divine™ and * Ohriut is God.":| Were supposod to hold, the Prosbyters could not this fogion.’ In tho by hior representative_ mon, ‘Gid_tench' that dootrine. \Vitli- soms . knowlodga of tho- doc- aat wook ho has lumsolt when the divine fa azcludod Trom 0 rint, - pnd | I ho (Swing) belioved in the divinity of Ohriat, | #equit him of tho charge of unfaithtuluess, sfter luce whe bl hody wan once aaen Ting from (s fomb, 5ad | o not.ay * Orlat ia- God aud muts i L g | Flans, an where the words were spoken, * Uowountomasll | ¢inot natures aud persous 7" That was what | Support, . i . - 3o st labor nd aro hiavy laden,” ia omptiod of & | {1557 wonted fo know. - - vt TIE TAKERIDE ARTIGLE, * World of Light und hxflm.,, - L 4 Ho (ving & s ‘Ho had quoted that .o ono.of the witnosues, | g.rintires ;" who ‘said ho did nob?! But what | s)iuded to. After compnting Chiono-wh and ukedrll ho considercd that an unequivoeal e s ) i Y Somnariug. Chioay statoment of. tho divinity of Ohrist, nnd be ro- | &2 meant by.thst? -Thors was a vast latitude ur liod * cortainly,” I was eusy 10 undoratand | P o0 inapitation of tho BOrpturon™ must |- in toaly: thece b s ponis of ol place ot N found withintwo ‘miles of Donver an emorald which ho believes still’ more valuablo then tho ry fine wator agato, whiol autiful gom ‘of strawberry color, Ho- bad sont tho omorald cast. Throo dinmonds have boen.exhibitod 1n Den ok; -~ that the ownor said was found " - aud east of tho range, Wo cannot : vouck for tha'truth of this roport, but there is no question oy to tha fact that tho othors wore: . of thie mien who roprescntod “her, and. requaintanco iwith .. Proabyterian history, he wojild characterizo snch n Gtatement a8 not trug - [applyuse on the. 1 ' minigter who made i sapphiro, and & vo will produce & be; Lt],.and the Pr desoryed cenaure, NO'APPLAUSE WANTED. o outerod hia protest against ap- plase from oithor aide. : Prof. Patton remarked thaf nothing was less ‘boliovod in tho “inapiration of the | Theartlelo'litha Lakesids Aonihly w Lios in a roligious point of view, ho said when. one undartook to ‘spoak” of t. " His | * Tt uppeard that, not oriy In Arablan dfesm, bui that ow the brothiron came thero to testify in behslf | . 1. | visibk d thut touol beart, 'A Quaker in< of tho fdolity of thoir mlnlunrb—my smy " that; |' 0 foliuad by whal bo b Sall bolt - the Sorih | Hacios prasios oves Pliisdeitie. s DatsiatlsHess | -bim ;- yot he was il £o kuow that thors. wors they hud hoard him proach tho -—whon thoy took thoae seutenaes as exprossing iy pensirated by o dovo! douired than suoli indications of sympathy by | 81l found within Jeas than gix miles of the Den« vor Poat-Ofico. h .. Who Lind an affection for | . .tlio} graiid” old dootriios aud steudurds which, | A Man Accidentanly Kills Ris Little thouigh at the riskof being discourteous; thoy clty of Obrist, | oytiments, woro insompatiblo Wwith o bollef I | Sules Lolds Tiltaburgh n great wibjoction Bt Loula L Lty +gion i1 the Prerbyto: the plonary {nspiration of the Soriptures,: which | of'iin: tender -Fegard for slavory dlsplayed by tho olT o dootrine. ‘Phoy might axprond. b aud thoy:| fhe "Proghytery roquirod’ as nocesinry: to gn0d |-baw.givers and At oAWAR, intll sbch ity fsy e ‘might nob; that whe tho question oudor disoui~1| ganding i tha Churol, for tho bady b o o e Bostriat o Ve g e e not taught the dactrine of the deity of Qhrs! Sk B8y nud, to subatantlata Lis viws, road from o ser. | DR, bocausp the princivio s, the mma In moi by Dr; Rydor: (Univorsaliut) on the Doty | affyiy ot oid b monn by ! Triniey 7" | of past publlo “ecperlonco. Mo En BE- Otk “*| Ho desirad to know if.. o belieyad fn. thres por~ | hers aro full of Oa Yirtus moro than thool It there waa anything which Prosbytorian ro- | aaual in power and glory, but'was in the dark. gnrdedulmpnnnm, it was that by minu's diso- }?n nafd ho belleved in the mediation of Olrlst. From the Lebanon ()o.) Chronicle, bl and hoaxt-ronding -oxpressed thomsolves in' that way. ! [Taughter g,n LL“ lef{..] .él‘ho lgpi\ltl‘ttun \YIB u&!t‘npfin llsu) ropbytorian Church .in tho, plos thoat hhe be-.| laat Saturday afterncon at ¢l vllcvpdxln salvation on tho'groiud ‘of naked +sent. ~ This wag Autinomianism, and the Churoh - would. rosent such s statement. olaggod with holding such views ag | FANDERED T0 INFIDELITY, aodibs wishad to kuow if the Prosbyto: allojy that to go on record without putting their n. | gign of disapproval on it ; and, in view of the uc- torgnces from his othor sermons, ‘and of his' - nd com- ?wxhtu‘(g :ludn.r’n "wfl'm .‘en‘c;:mnhnaeflt pmmr. hl.‘n‘ , . } o " mi It upon - plouar pire {gelf, Ohicago g an attempt at Evangelism, o e speakor then quoted othor passagea from | Sibled lself upon - vlouaty i '('q'fif,"i'é“ dobuly o ihe"Groeds Lelween Joruiaiem auil Ganora \ ; wootn forgotten. -1t hu b What ia callod a of . tho Ninth Ohurolh .and soquit Prof, pmnum“gmfial—dnv‘m, by It multituden; $hat'noed i 0y, nndt driven by thie faflire of ldactic theology oisowhore, It nllJfli'l tho advantage-.| . copal oliurchoa v i Bithous blomin it vefuiue lhes and-the commen BAN'S DISODEDIENCE. ) 5] i ho Bishop's blessing in ulur llue; and the comymon ans In ‘(o God-haid, thip, uamo fu anbtanoo, [ the Hishoos blewtag by soatis fups and the common firmed in the loly Apostolical Ohurch, . The Romu: athachin' ohihiren sowi ouF frea. achoois hiore nceident happened e rosidonce of Mr, , who lives sixtoon miles north of tlua; place and tlroo milos wost of Dooaturville, by whioh M. ag- | John Dovwal Tho cirommnstances of a3 wo losrn “thom, aro aa - owell wes slanding upon a Jargo log, in tho act of ohopping it lu two, whon Ly lictlo boy strayed Wwithin reach of the ax os whioh atruck the unfortunato would | follows: Mr. D it was descondin, ediouce, - gin aud death ontered the world. | Sodid the Uwiversalisti but what -did Deof, {ho Bishop himself csnnot soa thab Iho{u\uerh Bivle Tonco thoy would hardly think that o Prosby- | Buwing mosn whon e suids 1 boliovo in- hiyist | Lo isiiop hlasdf canuot cou that tho plea, whothor thoy wora willin to eay that ho wus!a faithful iministor, and ‘fal 2 ohild a glancin reprosontative’ 5 % o 1ittle souls, ow upon the hend, inflleting a torinn minjstor would call in_question that doo- | aa Aodintor.” Iis bolisved in the final separ- | All tie way from Rtobort Gallyer. to tobert Pattoraon triuo, or would loave its truth or, faleity to the | tion of the wioked, Bo did the Univorsalist; | tho proachiug is practical, froo from sectarlantam, fu conjeature of his hearors, but did he believe in overlasting pilshment—n gl.‘ gmummlnn through lovo. What wect js houoved y If God mudo man upright, then out of that original judicial act infiicted h{‘ QGod for the' subsarvance m«x :Ml:i'\::\:l:dl|:::k;:l:d—cl]lp nn‘;vh dny, tr;;m for | of His own Flory, ag {] car Do o Buty 1 Inan subscquontly foil futo a safal aiajo, tuen, |, P18, Jonfess Ticoatse all uahes atv: forg on of Faith 7 | & grot army of bukincss mon, und not falal wound, from whioh it died in & short time. Mr. Dowell’s slglt fu vory p informed that of the Gospol as_tho “sot forth iu the Chuisl tbo Pronbylorian Ch The Presbytery thon adj o'glook this mornivg, whou'Prof. Patton will rosumo lis argumont. It Is doubiful if ho underatood _it, and. had 1d the symbols of jotirned until Lialt-past indod we are d, aud did not kunow his little ono was noar him uutil toa lata ta mvort tho fatal blow, —_— Didwe Know It Was 0 fs almost bl o memershipol Tarwell or HMoody, f i otten an the toor at dootrino was taught i | {55 of Ourlation, Tho eity bolug tho balting-siees of wifll thin spiritus sopuration, the oyldoncs wonid'| . The prosccutor then rend Jamos Fresman m.htuq-mfnunn Bndonns, the local gospel was com. euch contury bocoms leas iy tity, Olarke's opinlon of * Etornal Punishmont," | pelled ower, Al Yo shold, fter & thne. Wit posird | saying that tio Unilarians would fndorso. overy | bio of dootriaod. : D which the heart of & eluner would bo bound to ouly { uttorance of Prof. Bwing on the subjoct, and’ O GRUAT COMPLIMENT, thor Who through boforo sometime to-morrow, ns thoro AzH tes 0 Locamo & modo of Virtue, rather than & jume ool eatiana ot 88, icte ) R¥0_ Lwenty-nino 8 spolion to four of ti . —_—— A tologram to the Boston Jlerald anys that o grd ovourrence took plnce in. Qarniub, Maine, on tho evldence of s aalnt, Dupravity would be sceking | that the cew-dopsrture Universalist could put | ‘Mo dld noz‘ think Dr. Pattorson oonsidered it convition from proof {ha was & Whetlor our won oL n ot s Buuday, A voung mian named Burgont, on some iug homo Batwidny nixht, hung up bis overcout, in"one pockot of iwhioh wna & ~loaded rayolves Lin elstq: Maria, & by The Great Sawors of Pariv. The sewers of Paris doserve to Lo ranked amopg tho wondors of the warld. 'Lhoy are o conatruption upon his m?hlnus whioh would | any groat compliment to be put info tho catogory right little girl of 8 Jortuney ust-buch wonoXleave 10.| be'favorabio to bis views. with’ Robort Collyer, and o bo rogarde il GARDANY oAt it e gp;gg. 810 | rof, Bwing eaid bo held tho doctiines * in | ho and thoy knew that Dr, Pattarson's theology W g 1¢God ta tho e of tha world, (hen the soul that thelr evaugolioal import." What wau under- | was the autipodos of Dr. Ooliyor's, traversod throu ortion of thelr oxtont | yoars, ornd the cont on the rop, from unplonsanb 0 -Hoar, and, s4 shq was hang.ng it up, the rovolver atood b; evangolical.” DId not the Unita- | pression would that statemont produce upon the | odor us the strests aboye thom. ;‘.‘E’b’%‘:&'&“'&?"ffi.‘é}:‘}?",5.5‘.'5;’.3(.‘]:’.’,.‘;‘1‘:;@, uoem 0 | riana olkira £0 bo syangalioal, and consider 1t ime | wind of, & miulstor? - 16 wad & principle of oon- tion of the B e Bagriases o hoaa o w r loas of hiappiuess Tuthor than of sxiutonoo, o s s o Itiano caough thet faith in a Divine being' & + P Passago through tho romsining portion la effocted by moaus of | aud bonte, Along these magnifioont sowors are car= | hor, cocked and fi e wiroa of the telograph, as well as the pueumatio tubes for tho transmission of ocket. Bho pioked it up to show ng it wu;rtl:;m:dfipu(?m fln": o a toriang, and Mothodists to srrogate’the ox- | to intend the nntural aud probable conse- hnufi :nfl“&:?uu t; ¢ lustdntly, girl's side just bolow the usivo right of bolng evangelical 7 “Was it | quouces of .hls aow, What would be wioked ; othors menune for the Eplscopalians, Baptiutn, Pres- | struction that a mnan was conclusively presumed cfv the floor aud explrod nlmos