The Bismarck Tribune Newspaper, February 19, 1927, Page 6

JIMMY MALONEY WINS DECISIVE VICTORY OVER JACK DELANEY IN RICKARD’S ELIMINATION TOURNEY ; Weight Advantage of 3 Pounds and Merciless At-! tack Proves Undoing Light Heavyweight King—| Result Startling Upset inj View of 13 to 5 Odds on, Titleholder New York, Feb. carnation of the fam van loomed tc heavyweight king. A new Boston Edward James Jack ey, king, to defeat in 10 thr last night before 19, buy hammered “strong boy, M ammed rounds | throng Square Garden. And with Malo’ by decision —a F came realization to the tors that a good big man good little man every tim a decisive a mercil backward step, From the opening gong, the giant threw the larges' Mad on} Bo: his bulk onto his pound rival. Two massive arm gruelling smashes through guard the Bridgeport, ( absorbe mightiest shots of De broadsides. ney'’s crashi ry Awarded Six Rounds The result was inevitable. Most ide critics awarded Male rounds by decisive margi , with two eve no knockd ne smash and uppe Maloney ut 1 strong, and too. ste power f >t reed to do me What Tunney Thinks weight crown of Gene Tunney iney pic y to beat nf the » believes Mike Me- ing bout for suid today. : DEMONS BEAT JIMMIE FIVE IN FAST GAME! "1Cagers Avenge Previous De- feat By Stutsman Co. Team By Winning, 17 to 13 in and fight previ- mn when they 17 to 13, last able and they were shake tated grizz more, The re view of the at di shagg d lik y and erash forward for! ult wa. 13 tartling upset in] De De The Ma t weight division had been = .up to last night. In his tests he has scored 15 won 12 di out once, in four from Sharkey loney lost to twice in i again on old and The fight was part of Tex Ri ard’s elimination tournament to de- ne Tunney’s r next September. ably. will be matched key-MeT Garden 3 Flickertails Lose favorite, nds in arch to Creighton Quint \ )., Feb. 19, ity’s Blue Ja their third north central confer 1 cham- pionship here las defeating University of North Dakota, 31 to 27. The Omaha outfit has but "ewol I games yet to pl. one of them to title. Creighton’s speed and deadly long pelled defeat — for With the ex Grand Forks Creighton virtually AP) be assured of the quint was through the heads of the defense. Creighton play. basketball, mi swift thrusts at often caught North pared, while the Flickertai most ‘part, relied on. the game but lacked the old drive to put the ball through, Dates Announced For Cage Tourneys District basketball tourname: idated Graded High School will he held at Halliday, 24 and 25; at Berthold, and 26; ‘and at Carson, and 5. In the Berthold district, from Kramer, Lone Tree, Douglas, Ryder, Parshall, Bergen, Fokholm, Makoti wich will compete. Halliday, Kildeer, Werner, Dunn Center, Hazen, Golden Valley, and Stanton will be entrants in the ful- Tiday tournament. The Carson tournament will dr member teams from the southwe ern part of the state. Fi fincipal of schools ut New Leipzigy E in charge. Over 90 schools are paid-up mem. bers of the league this year, accord ing to M. C. Spacht, superintendent of schools at Foxholm, who is sec- retary of the organization. state tournament is to be held Valley City next month, h Girls’ Teams to Play March “4 and Nor- For World Cage Title}, 2, Feb, 19.—(). played by, boye, wo, er . - joys, two girls’ teams mi ane ai 4 “tor the women’s bas Petal Fo churapiontit of the world. go ‘and the iris, latter world’s ites of naving ren fee four "elmonten, pies last Hd eae and must win but; ¥ ng the third quarter Detin s period end | Jamestown lived up to its reput r : on defense vn shot oppor- » locals reeiprocat their de and Burdick, games for proved a co Andersen andi Fran ts did good work, dy improvement shown by the Demons the past evident in fumbling ed the quint carl peared and The box seore: Bismarck . Olson, g. . Lofthouse, g. 11! Anderson, g. Frank : 4 Greenfield, pi ecco OR Fights Last Night (By New Referee: The Associated Press) York— mmy Vogel, aded Charles Man’ Warrent, C Johnstown, Pa., y Ferguson, ing- a. Glen Bell, Los s, and Al Delgaldo, New York, drew (4), roit—Johnny Datto, Clevelan ted Chick Suggs, New Belford, — Tiger Flowers, defeated Lou Bogash, Conn., (10). Mass.—Marty Donahue, outpointed Johnny Altanta, Boston fe Bridge- Ga., port, ter, pion (10). Oklahoma City, Okla.—Pete welterweight champion, Billy Piltz, Tulsa (10). Latzo, Minneapolis —- Ernie. Fleige polis, outpointed Pe lippines (10). Britt Minneapolis, defeated Kid Kansas City (8). Mi Duluth, outpointed Gus St. Paul (4). rmiento, Gorman, Schlaifer’ Worth, gh ty hting Yap, Haw Basketball St. Olaf 29; MacAlester 9. i enaro Pino, ight champion, knockout over ii (3). {much y[#bout the whole wheat grain. | | Boston, drew] ? anadian welterweight cham-| 7 defeated | [DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT Liquid evidende lis admissible re+ rardless of weather or not, in liquor the federal officer. who ob- ined the evidence was without a warrant, the state supreme court has ld in'the case of Tom Lacy, ap- jed from the Ward county district] g; y. who was held on 1» Tiquor ; appealed to the supreme ‘court, contending that the federal |agent who found him with some al- cohol in front of his hone did not have a search warrant or a warrant for his arrest. The lower court was | sustained. ong other recent supreme court ions was that of Minnie Barb- ht against the Grea: Northern | Railroad company, also appealed. | from Ward county. The woman, con- |tending that a porter employed by \the railroad had used insulting lang- |uage, was given a verdict of €2,000. railroad appealed. Tae lower court was upheld with the exception that the woman must accept $500! damages instead of $2,000, or start a new sui Other decisions were: Tanous Brothers against J. F. Taa- appealed by the plaintiff” from ns county relating to crop mort- In affirming the lower court that the title o€ grow- sted in the mortgagee jat the expiration of the period of redemption from a foreclosure sale. yseno against the Pad- et al, and the Northern company, appealed from Benson county by Paysend, who brought suit to recover money claim- ed due him for hire of horses used by the Padgett company in road rk_in Wells county. The North- ern Trust company was surety on bonds covering the projeet. The was dismissed in the lower court, which was reversed, and the matter sent back for new trial. The ‘| supreme court held that one furnish- jing horses for hire which are used |for highway work under a contract |performs a service within the con- ditions of a bond protecting the per- sons in the contract, ard et al against W. E. appealed from Dunn the plaintiff. The lower Wisconsin's hopes for a victory the annual Poughkeepsie regatta took on a bri ighter hue with the on pointment of Oscar Te crew captain, as ai Teckemeyer one of the three best str the country last year. Cotlogomor Wins New Orleans Race | county |court upheld. The case involved tactions to foreclose three mortgages Cot-| against Kopka. srt Patterson Land company _ against is] |the Merchants bank of Napoleon, ay through a| Petled from Logan county by the eine rhe | land company, ee dae certain Ovlonwecail- | foreelosur on land. The lower ans all-| court affirmed, the supreme court ruling that no civil laws are ee unless they are so de- in New logomor, the post with 24 the longest shot of the race 50 to 81 | Charles L, Rouse against Rudolph! mmerman and Ralf Reite, appealed from Divide county by Rouse. The/ °% | case, concerning a mortgage fore- s reversed and the plain- tiff given judgment. Millers and Traders State bank of in ‘Planting’ Game Birds During 1926 Minneapolis against the National ba | Fire Insurance company of Hartford, "| Conn., appealed from Ward county im! by the insurance company. The low- and | or ffirmed in an appeal denying an applica- atement of the case iter the expiration of the time limit.! Good P Progress Made From Dunn County Heegaard and James D. wn, Trustees, and First Loan and Securities Company, ie corporation, Plaintiffs and Appellants. vs. GL. Defendants. ter E. Nordahl, Defendant and Respondent. SYLLABUS: % 1. Plaintiffs loaned money to the! defendant Kopka. They took as se- 'y a third’ mortgage on his real state with the understanding that the first and second mortgages there- on should pe discharged either from the proceeds of the loan or by Kopka from other sources. Plaintiffs paid it mortgage debt and charged ‘ment against Kopka on ac west-| count of the loan, The loan was in tern portions of the | sufficient to pay the second mortgage his repo ndebtedness and Kopka failed-to pay ish hatch it from other sources. Plaintiffs Ke 1400 carp and buffalo | brought this action to foreclose the re taken from the lake dur-| first mortgage, afiaiming as assignees la on d given to the| or subrogees. Held, for reasons stat- |ed in the opinion, that the plaintiffs | paid and discharged the first mort- vage debt and were not assignees id- | thereof. ey dis: | 2, The doctrine of subrogation is Peter-| purely equitable. It was conceived | of a desire to attain substantial ju: ar to be highly nd no doub! ers will have a) curity It is to] ¢ » sports alone un- lared,” Pe. hoped, will leav tions Johnny i ey but was such the Falls to Be Given | discharged a ‘debt at the instance creditor who was thus paid, But the knbw more abgat food ahs where he who claims benefit pag More of it.| Zesult in an injustice to another. up all the facts ubout | titled to the right of subrogation to Appeal from the digtrict court of not studying as history | a chance Opinion of the court by Nuessle, if he writes a pei ‘winning | M Mandan, Attorneys for Plaintiffs and | L, Malloy, of. Halliday, Attorvieys for 50,000 school | Minnie Barbknecht, ~ and irls— | Great Northern, “Railway Com- ‘put up at Niagara. Falls? 1, Where a complaint sets forth . It proceeds upon the theor: Trip <= Niagara | that he who invokes it has rightfully and for the benefit of the debtor and F may be substituted in the place of the in Essay Contest doctrine is always subject to ae Sha apices TREE ee provision that it will not be appl h a volunteer, a stranger, or an inte Ee Know more | meddier, or where its application will \ Fer vet | Held, for reasons stated in the opin- a Be EE igaged | i0R that the plaintiffs are not en- , : the first mortgage debt as against Ki shistory of wheat. He| tne defendant, the second mortgagee. Dunn County, Hon. Thos. H. Pugh, luc of wheat because of |YUdge. thrist for knowled AFFIRMED. ara Fall Judge. redded Wheat Com. | Sullivan, Hanley & Sullivan, of ee of ex-| Appellants. ie iasener with |, TF; Murtha, of Dickinson, and H | Defendant and Respondent, From Wart | County From these | Plaintitt and Respondent, cted | went to Niagara | pany, a corporation, pense of the compan ae ai Defendant ‘and Appellant. ial hotel, and were given a us in the beautiful dining-|two or more causes of action, even though intermingled, the took a Gorge railway,|to substantiate one of the ca ps ipa lay eed | action, if there be sufficient proof to Ete substantiate the other cause; provid- s ag iceiey ef their Youn 24 there are sufficient allegations to x inger long in tl ei! establish such . other cause ren. | though the allegations slang, to the | first and which distinguish it front | the second, be eielonen from the com- | plaint. 2. A passenger traveling by rail- road on a ticket contract is entitled to protection against the misconduct and insults of an employee of the railroad company while on duty Where the porter on g ei in, le on duty as such porter, applies opprobrious epithets and insultiry; language to such passenger the car- ier is responsible damages for of Dispels Fevers, Eliminates Colds, | Cures Constipation | Pills, a treatment that | ause and restores the 3 aids in preventing ping the bowels ac- tive, the blood cool and lowering ar- terial tension, inona Teachers 20; Mankato Tedchers 18, Augsburg 40; Hamline 25. St. Thomas 33; St. Mary's 17. Rochester Junior cotlege 35; St. Cloud Teachers 30. Minot State ald 46; Park Region eal e 31. Hbine d he entions 25; Virginia rae High 25; St, Cloud high 17. [Bree such misconduct, 4. Where testimony is offered su porting a cause of action set forth in the complaint and the plaintiff ties her case on the theory that the sults addressed to her are an “as- sault,” and the court in its cha the jury misconstrues the legal in| fect of the insults s0 as to torm it an “assault” this court agi not rér Excellent for liver, stomach, bowel troubles, gall stones, ndicitis, biliousness, dropsy, indigestion, dys- pepsia, constipation. Their mild but wonderful laxative action cleanses the Bion by natu: means, overcoming ments of the Tehiles system. Red Cross Pills are put up hag shaped, screw top bottles, sold druggists for 25e. or sent by Ror |-verse the. verdict appears] Minneapolis, Minn.—Adv, [tear ghat the jury could net have® considered anything but the language used and no requests were made for specific instructions diferentiating between insultin, sault as defined the statute. 5. Under the provisions of su! ivision 6, Section 7660 C. L, 1913 a: amended by Chapter 334 of the 8S, L. of 1923, this Court may order a re- duction of the amount of damages al- lowed by the verdict of the jury, when it appears the damages are excessive, the other issues have not Ben in- fluenced by passion or prejudice, and when a new trial is demanded _be- cause of such excessive damages. Evi- dence examined and it is determined the damages allowed are excessive and clearly appear to have been giv- en under the influence of passion or prejudice. The court therefore will grant a new trial unless the plaintiff consents to a reduction of the ver- dict from $2000 to $500 and agrees to remit the excess of damages, Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Hon, John C. Lowe, Judge. AFFIRMED upon condition. Murphy & Toner, Grand Forks, N. D., Attorneys for Appeliant. John E. Burke, Minot, N. D., Attor- ney for Respondent. — From Benson County George Payseno, les and Appellant. | The Padgett ‘Company, a cor- poration, et al, Defendants. The Northern Trust Company, a corporation, Defendant and Respondent. SYLLABUS 1. Section 6832 of the Supplement to the 1913 Compiled Laws and Sec- tion 6833 of the Compiled Laws for 1913, which require public officers and boards authorized to enter into contracts for public improvements to take from the ‘contractor a bond con-} ditioned to be void if the ¢ naay all and all sub-contractors shall pay all bills ‘and claims on account of labor or materials furnished in and about the performance of the contract, at the peril of being held personally liable, and Section 607a6 of the Sup- plement to the 1913 Compiled Laws, specifically requiring bonds from con- tractors for highway work, are de- signed to afford pratection to those furnishing labor, service or material entering into a public improvement. 2. A statutory bond will be con- strued in the light of the purpose for which it is required as expressed in| the statute. 3. One furnishing for hire horses) which are used in the prosecution of | highway work under a contraet. per- forms a service within the condition of a bond protecting persons perform- ing any labor or services or furnish- ing material in the performance of the contract. Appeal from the DistiJct Court of Benson County, Hon C. W. Buttz, Judge. REVERSED AND REMANDED, jOvinion of the court by Birdzel, Geo, Thom, Jr., MeClusky, N. Dak., Attorney for Appellant. Pie Tenneson, Cupler & Stam- baugh, Fargo, N. Dak, and Wardrope & Butterwick, Minnewaukan, N. Dak., Attorney for Respondent. From Adams County language and as-| y gages executed before the passage of the law. |. Appeal from the District Court of Legan County, North Dakota, Hon. George M. MeKenns, Judge. AFFIRMED. Opinion of the court by Burke, J. A. T. Faber, Bismarck, North 'D | kota, Attorney for Plaintiff and Ap- pellant. I. F, Wagner, Napoleon, North Da- | kota, Attorney for Defendant and Re- spondent. From Ward County Millers & Traders State Bank, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, a corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent. vs. . National Fire Insurance Com- pany, of Hartford, Connecticut, a corporation, Defendant and Appellant. SYLLABUS: An application for settlement of a statement of the case after the time limited terefore by the statute has expired is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the trial court, and its ruling will not be disturbed unless the record presented on appeal shows that the trial court abused its discretion, It is held-that in the in- stant case there was no Abuse of dis- cretion. wet o from the district court of County, Hon. H. Moellring, Judge. Defendant appeals from an order denXing an’ aplication to settle a statement of the case after the ex- piration of the time limited therefore. AFFIRM! oe of the court by Christian- in, Je disse & Tillotson, of Bismarck, N. Dak., and William Furst, of Minne- apolis, Minn, (of counsel), Attorneys for Appellant. L. J. Palda, Jr., C. D. gh Cc, E. Brace, and Robert all_of Minot, N. Dak., for Re- rausabauye spondent, From Ward County State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Respondent. vs. Tom Lacy, SYLLABUS: 1. In a prosecution for the crime Defendant and Appellant. t! of engaging in the liquor traffic, the evidence is examined and held suffi- cient to support the judgment of con- viction, 2, Where one through a search and eon made without legal justifica- ion obtains evidence tending to prive that the defendant committee an of- fenge, such evidence is admissible. Appeal from the district court of Ward County, Hon. John C. Lowe, Judge. AFFIRMED. Opinion of the court by Cole, Dis- trict Judge. Burr, J., being disqualified, did not participate; Hon. A. T. Cole, Judge of the First Judicial District, sitting in his stead. L. J. Palda, Jr., C. E. Brace, and Robert W. Palda, Minot, N. Dak., At- torneys for Appellant. Geo. F. Shafer, Attorney General, K E. Leighton, General, Bismarck, N. Dak., and H. E. Johnson, State’s Attorney, Minot, N. Dak., Attorneys for | for Respondent. From Nelson. County Peoples State Bank of Aneta, a corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant. M.S. Lee and Fiore B. Lee, Defendants and Respondents. A. Tanous, J. Tanous and D, Tanous, co-partners under the firm name and style of Tanous Brothers, Plaintiffs and Appellants. vs. J. F. Tracy, Defendant and Respondent. SYLLABUS: 1, Under section 8106 C. L. 1913, all the right, title and interests. of, the mortgagor to land sold on fore- closure of a mortgage vests in the mortgagee inimediately on the execu- tion of the statutory deed, at the ex- piration of the period of redemption. 2. Growing crops are a part of the}, reaity, and as between mortgagor an ortgagee the title to growing crops vest in the mortgagee at the expira- tion of the period of redemption from foreclosure sale. Appeal fim the District Court of | yy, Adams County, North Dakota, Hon. F. a Tamas. ke, Jade, reeves of the court hy Burke, J. Paul W. Boehm, Hettinger, North Dakota, and Morrison & pkaue, ee bridge, South Dakota, Atforni Plaintiffs mae Appellants. FM. atbingre, North De- ota, and J. ‘kK. Mu Mott, North |, Dakota, Attorneys for lendant and Respondent. From Divide. County Charles L, Rosse. Plaintiff and Appellant. vs. Rudolph Zimmerman, et al, Defendants. Rolf Reite, pofendant and Respondent. sence of ere to the contrary equity assum he intention of the holder rr a great- er estate and a less estate which meet in his person to merge the same when an intermediate estate inter- of a. third! mortgage pays the installments due on the first mortgage together with accruing costs in order to’ prevent] breac! foreclosure of this first mortgage he. ig entitled to be subrogated to the rights under the first mortgage, to the extent of his parts as Agana, an intervening second though he has frreinees mortgage and received Sheriff's deed thereon,in the absence of proof show- ing his intention to merge the es! 3. In such case jt is not necessary for the one‘claiming the et sab. rogation to pay all instal! its due in the future before td is Fee age to his rights. Eac! iment is a separate debt and it ie sufficient if he has paid all the amount due on the debt for which he claims the right tt f subrogation. bag gal’ from the District Court of Divide County, Hon. John C. Lowe,| jj Jus Sense AND JUDGMENT O8- DE! Opinion of the court by Burr, J. GoW. Twitord, of Minot, N. D., At- jorney for Appellant. Geo. P. Honnes, Crosby, N. D., At- torney for Respondent. ren Company Patiarson nd Cs Company, a by orsign CorPemisintitt and Appellant. Merchants Bank of Napoleon, not! in both cases. ane thie third m tates. bg other -insyranee SYLLABUS: 1. An-appeal from a judgment must be taken within six months from the da - of the notice of the entry thereo! 2. Where a jury is called to sit in an advisory capacity in an equitable baction, the cause is not triable anew in this court on appeal from the judgment, under Section 7846, Sup-| the plement to the 1913 Compiled Laws. ‘Appeal from: the District Court of Nelson County, Hon, A. T. Cole, Judge. DISMISSED. Opinion of the court by Burke, | Judge. E. G. Larson, Bismarck, N, Dak., and Lauder & ere Wahpeton, N. Dak., Attorneys for Appellant. Frich, Roberts & Burke, Lakota, N, Dak. kan me Cyn elt, ged phy orm Fargo, - | torneys for Respondents. From Sheridan County Wm, Pfaffengut; Paneth and Respondent. Export Insurance Company of New York, a corporation, et al, Defendants. | Export Insurance Company of New York, a corporation, Appellant. (And: companion: case.) SYLLABUS: 1, Plaintiff henna the above en: titled actions; one, to pads ae a Hive ‘tice, to, determine the sights. of letermine, the: 0! the in and to a draft issued in settlement ofa cl los? der a second Pa. on oe tomobile. meat t erable the pln | roars ‘ings of fact. avo. id inthe opi ‘that cviderice is sustain ini che finlage aa thade by.thd ey Where, im an action ‘fo recover as a poltey of ini ‘the defend. ds as a defense breach of ie ition of Oe: Boliey ane and Pg the acl same_is -voi breach, the sinciff unde! 7452 and 7467-7477, c. i ‘91a. “| Be Peg greg og ee pleading such waiver he Sol way of Section 3. A provision in an’ Ins liey. that it be wold Lat the time of loos tre be Corben aged but ve saab, for tea ender oa are re: sure which the irene Peete the: ‘cou mi be nr dis- , Hon. ) IN: BOTH: curt by ‘Nuessle, Appeals in Kooy tried eoer one oS of ea count J. A. Co! gue ny CASES, : se of the i ‘Assistant Attorney | levy sa 2 | 1926, the balance on hand in the real |® five most im) GOVERNOR: MAY VETO CERTAIN IVA MEASURES Nespatticing Het Hope Executive Will Stand as Bulwark of His Party Interest in progress of the legis- lature, which up to now has been centered almost wholly upon the senate and house, rapidly is spread- ing to include the governor's office. The reason is the possibility that Governor A. G. Sorlie may veto some of the bills enacted by a politically hostile legislature. Announcement that he already has resolved to use the veto power wherever he thinks it advisable without regard to the feclings of his political opponents already has been made by the governor and Non- partisan legislators are doing noth- ing toward encouraging him to re- cede frpm the stand, Numerous Nonpartisan leaders a1 known to have suggested to the e: ecutive that he veto certain measures which have Oe ae bitter bia eg in the assembly.-. They regard hi: as the last bulwark of the Nonparti- sans in halting legislation which they feel will hamper the operation of the various state industries and departments inaugurated b; the league and which still are @ear to its heart. Included, in, the list which the ex- ecutive has been ed to veto are jseveral insurance measures relating to both the state hail and fire, torna- do-and bonding insurance laws. Close political advisers of the gov- ernor are said to be convinced that free use of the veto will strengthen him materially with those members of -his own party who have been none too friendly toward him. They point that by standing at the bulwark is party against alleged Inde- peatent inroads he will place the lompartisan League under obliga- tions to him which it cannot well escape. LEVY FOR LAND BOND INTEREST IS NOT NEEDED (Continued from from page one) that a levy of $750,000.00 be made for such fund. fter consideration of such request, the te board of equalization took no action upon the matter, The board informally dis- cussed the toe ter _ concluded no wi On June 30, estate bond payment fund was suf- ficient. to _pay the interest on out- standing bonds on July 1,°1926; to cover the required amortization fund reserve as of that date, and there was addition thereto. a surplus of $87,- 000.00. This proved that the judg- ment of the equalization. board was correct. “The manager of the Bank of North Dakota, in making a request: in 1926 for a levy of $750,000.00 for the real estate bond payment fund, ‘based his request upon an estimate that there would be collected into the real estate bond payment fund from loan collections only $1,138,834.- 00 out of a total of $1,891,821.00 fall- ing one within the -fiscal year, In it seven months. of the fiscal et beginning Joly 1, 1926, farm hoe collections, according to.the rec- e state treasurer, amounted to $1,149,308.00 or more than $10,000 in excess of the estimated collections for the entire y fle made b- the manager of the Ba North Dako- ta. The bak of, ‘North Dakota acts 8. agent of the state treasurer in the conduct of the real estate farm loan business of the State of North Da- According to the records of Rebrnary 1. 7, there was. cash on hand in. the pels -estate bond sinking fund of $1,113,346,60. Such amount: included a surplus of $12,371.87 in excess of the required amortization fund reserve. On, the same date the records of the. state. Sxsennrer's office perder age ° rat nm “a rete th real estate bond: interest fun: $448,985.44, and-after. deducting out- 233.36, the balance in the interest fund of ‘308, 702.08 on February 1, 1927. fale) is time to d ee whet wil be the tort rately: tat ki ae iS fare saint Pe a mparison of. real ataia a: | oan gal gelietions for thi ever, sheds some light spon is eben, "From duly 1, 1925. to february 1, 1926, real estate loan. col- lections amounted, Le Nara oh From July 1, real -Toaneol eulicetions aed real estate loa) ebr + The, total am: real estate sponds. ‘on July 1, 1927 will be fae pepe On February 1, 1927 we bed ¢ uted on hand towards the nt of this amount in\the sum oe $108,702. . If the collections on the farm. eve for the pet period nebec February 7: and panty, 1927 will be he aime, a ng te! Niccted for ar, we will Sees ges and July 1, ‘agat with which to pay interest in the ‘amount. of $683, “There is no: oh being who can, ‘at this time, foretell whet the pay- ment by the farmers. will amount to by July. 1. het estimate is. merely a it. So far there hes been no def- cit but a surplus and therefore no occasion . for. making any tax. levy. If the time shall come that a levy is mecessaty, we have the state board of equal ization ready to make such Hlevy. This board is. comprised of the int officera. of the State, namely:' Governor, state trea- surer, state auditor, commissioner of agriculture and labor oe tax. com- missioner... Two of these members are alse mi of the industrial commission. ‘The- official records of the board of equalization show no dis- ‘senting vote any of the tax levies made, -All: were: d. This shows that's even the members of the indus- trial commissio1 ized that no 3 aa fondant and Respondent: YLLA! 3 pes Folowing Lander & Co,: ha rt | is im Sairodve “for interest on inst | mi: repre ta Pa rie. mie cone nated or in th we nee. e office of te ‘state treasurer on| Phi! Any man can make his wife do exnectly as she picases, brands of concentrated foods be reg- istered, with the state chemist and that they be labeled in accordance with the proposed law. The label must contain a guaranteed analysis of the stock food, showing “the min- imum percentage of crude fat and crude protein, and the maximum percentage of crude fiber—and the ingredients from which the concen- trated commercial feeding stuff is compounded.” It also requires all such feed to be examined yearly. The state chemist would sell tags to. be at- tached to each package of fee Feeds with a maximum crude fiber content of 12% per cent or more would be labeled with yellow tags on which the percentage of certain ingredients would be printed in red ink, The cost of the tags would vary with the size of the package to which they would be affixed. The bill bars the use of adulter- ated or damaged feeding stuffs in branded stock foods and the use of certain other ingredients uhless thei use is plainly stat: Among these materials are mill, el vator, boat or other sweepings or dust; buckwheat, cottonseed or pea- nut hulls, rice or oat hulls, peanut shells, ground corn cobs, chaff, dust or inferior cleanings derived from the preparation, cleaning or milling of any seed or grain when separa from the standard product; humus, peat, sphagnum moss, my nut turnings, ground corn stalks, flax plant by-products, sorghum pulp, sawdust, tree bark, cellulose or dirt, coffee hulls or chaff or any other materials of equally low feeding value. . NEWS BRIEFS ( Lone bandit holds up passengers in Ocean Shore express sleeper near San Francisco, robs two men of $7, and es- capes, General railroad strike in Mexico fails to uffect principal lines to capi- tal as many workers disrovard strike order. Four American army goodwill planes arrive at.Santiago, Chile, from Coquimbo, Chile; plane San Francisco, flying to overtake leaders, arrives ut Lima, Peru. President presses gold telegraph key in Washington giving signal. for blasting away final obstruction in Pioncer Moffatt water tunnel through Rocky Mountains in Colorado. Grand Forks—David M. Holmes, 7 one of founders of Grand Forks, for! er mayor here and one-time Democra- tic candidate for governor, died. Washington—Members of” congress planning to sail March 22 for the hilippines include Rep. urt- ness, North Dakota. St; Paul—Sievert A. Salvog of St. Paul, recently dismissed as superin- tendent of state fisher pleaded guilty to. charge of wrongfully be- coming interested, in sale of state property. Sentence deferred until March. 4. Spring Hats Pastel Shades are The New $5- $6 Invest- igate