The Bismarck Tribune Newspaper, November 10, 1925, Page 6

PAGE SIX port THE SCHEDULE MAKES, BREAKS GRID MENTOR The Mlinois - Pennsylvania Game Offers Proof of the Part Schedule Plays BY BILLY football | able wa Another the =menta “side. had utters Pe Mir ul to pected Penn There is ne t that th tina racting MINOT 6 thir Pennell 1h Pr EVANS big im the old RIDDERS WOULD LIKE GAME | WITH FARGO TEAM Minot I mood now Mins who, ho ta Fargo desirous the un ter will be Minot will be } season's: Inure def i? wy HELPFUL HINTS (* g without he: to take at Ie sox. A felt inn If your boots, shods the rub. bd hesive tape u t skin. This will fix it. Herr Stuhldrehe: a in his first bi Nova, His so far has been a 3. fr HUNTERS BY MORRIS ACKERMAN auartenhack at Notre Dan or Notre Dame Star | =: Delivers as Coach) former star doing coach ay 3 arst gefeat by the Villa Nova { strong Dickinson team: { beat Rutgers 20-0. is : Use Gas. It’s the Scientific Fuel, | TAGE TACTICS KILLS POPULARITY CLOTILES LA STOR HALO ignifieant p aoe Sp He Mr. O'G simpl afty on Ki duke h DEMPSEY’S #": THE BISMARCK. TRIBUNE - whether spikes “Bool hapy running + nont that day, ” Rut Wats care had slid into tie] ‘onfid Lover with | ned 1 F OOTBALL PICTORIAL Picking Up Fumble rg an open field oe to be gained by © pickin, up un ball rather than falling on There is the nee to run it ‘se sweep- x motion, one nd in front, the other in back to camp} tightly on regain ing possession. merely it. Picture po 4 by Charles Berry. ¥ Lafayette, All America end, 1924. prere Tomorrow: Using ands on Interference. one} tid TUESDAY, fave a bond for his appearance, and made no objection to the sufficiency For reasons’ stated, it is held the demurrer to the information was properly overruled, For reason: ated, it hei H no error was committed in the rulings of the trial court upon the j sue of a former convictio An_ informition, ¢ ing the ferime of bootlegging, is suffic s against an attack by motion rest of judgment, although it con- no Specific description of the premises where the sale is alleged to have been made, and merely charges t the offense was committed with- in a certain county. sale of aleohol in the streets of a municipal corporation, is ‘upon premises not owned, ¢, main- talned, or controlled by the defend- ant, within the purview of the boot, For reasons stated, it is held that thd -évidence supports the ver- dict of the jury to the effect that the liquid sold alcohol, and was sold jon premises not owned, kept, main- tained or controled by the defend- NOVEMBER 10, 1925 | gars WhoDetermines Firelnsurgnce Answer: tas the game ; Sig | ant. : i eure to) his |_,8, Broot havi been made by the You do. You and Ihe bel bie ‘state that the substance sold was al-, a The bet was to a * like cohol, it was not, in the cireumstan- every property own- © Faiture ‘ees disclosed in the record, necessary? er like you, who creased ete Ga, jto xo further and prove that it was 2 hi hie tiene |soll on Tit for Leverage purposes, | elect the kind of time 0 8 secon Hl i 9. ons stated held that | 148 ‘ . ae fe staal seule Wad | ceviin emgria of the court were) buildings you live whereup hrew a iful ofl not prejudicial. i i He threw a handful ofl vational open golf title? I. | Compiled Laws for the 10. Hor sodsdue’ stated: held, thit] in and the kind of IN 1913. treasurer is the disbursing offic the omission of the word housekeeping you When and where will anual! the ¢ and charged with the the instruction defining a AsaH fe ame between | alife Stan- | bursement of all city and spe crime of bootlegging, was error o. Asa Hartford be sessment funds. A’ foreign out prejudice. Nev. pation may not act as the city tre ‘Appeal from the district court of | Agent i can help on th oy ter, nor as a depositary of Cass County, Hon, M. J. Englert, you to make your m if rf “ ifunds (Chapter ion Law Judge. fe pleasant time at the j bal carce ah, | E20. nor R uthor Opinion of the court by Johnson, J. property safer. ' . | ye itt ely club, to lend its credit to a foreign cor-} Affirmed, } "You fussy umpires just | Southwestern League, poration Wood & Breaw, Fargo, N. D., at- an ext 00 toss by BBP (4) Where municipal improve ent | tone, for defendant vand appellant. MURPHY » 1 see why Hildebrand * w nts: taken b; foreign cor- u. Horner, St: Attorney, J. “ " "4 r¢ re should be" so. particular about that poration and eredit given the city! F, Hendrickson, Assistant State's At! The Man Who Knows out suit of blue he is wear- upon its books, the attempte jtorney, and V. R. Lovell, Attorney's | Insurance’ charge by such corporation of a pu , Fargo, | ype. eae | ene ported obligation of the city to al | Bismarck, N. D. Phone 577 | 7 ‘ROs BM UI contractor and the charging of the | Babe has been a | Seu shia) same against the s account, doe elson County i — =. elo to ise suse he see Winona hers ve not complete a sale of the warrant Nerth Dakota, plaintiff | a. cee ed to have thi y of doing his: dunior ¢ aches a (5) Where a purported purchaser! a t, vs. W. H. Fury, de- |” “ bout the tim Aggies vs. Thom) of municipal improvement warrants | appellant. } GRID QUIZ : : ; sal Fase at Win.| i8 Shown to h reed with the city | SYLLABUS i . 3 | uthwestern vs, Sterling at Win) cuthorities to disburse the proceed 1. A complaint in the em pre By Billy Evans 5 auheescatt tor upon the allowance | scribed by L. 1913, anne nds vs. Pitts! Teachers at | lg vs. i tr of final estimate for the work, and proceeding under se William Jewell at Kan. Where the purported purchaser has forin Inexithnacs Act, Chap- Ny. William Jewell al Kan rnowledge of the proceedings which S.L, 1923, where the de-| : 7 {¢ ae a show that the work was never com- nt tende by a written | ally for hurdting | clipe ae aa pleted in accordance with the plans; answer, and the proceeding had are | Ping ah opponent? oe Waa oe ar 1 hand spe ions and the contract ,on the theory that the Uniform Act | What recourse has the referee youd be ey Supreme Court obligations, such purchaser holds th and are in accordance with | in his opinion one of the teams is Ruppert i Decisi warrants subject to the defe quirements. j Purpoxels delaying the game? Tanck anon ecisions ‘listing in favor of the municiy 2. A proceeding may be brought | 42: paid tees the colonel > od sing out of the bre }under the Uniform Mlegitimacy Act, an a ‘ligible Biever of the his speceh for the amor From Richland County ee Co eri) Ete ee nee on the com | Side and opponent... Both at Ruth was in for ‘good Dakota Trust Comp: A corpo! a municipalit a the mother of a child born firm grip on the bali. To whe ieadaition to the ‘ tf ct tor the construction within ten months subsequent | i atte iu addition to the ation, plaintiff and oo ees A ment | it belong? City of Hankinson, 1 n consisting 0: to the dissolution of her marriage to | a double itioti cr pipe, nholes, septic tank, sludge | another than the alleged father. AN: i made Roney bed, ete, the contract is not divisible Where in the trial of 2 proceed- Ity for clippin nthe hey ming’ than Ruth. Shortstop Is Boston Sox May Iv can hirty-six vietori feats, made in 1913. When ,did Bobby Jones We gene Greatest Need Trade Mound Ace s and seven de-| within Sect: win on the of the various units of imus, should be withhe Appeal from the Di chland County, Hon. tio: ary ‘ remedy, council authorizes the nee on warrants to such contract- upon part performance of his | ct, exercising powers confer- 10 of the Compiled Laws for 1913, and where such war- rants are transferred to one, against whom the city can not asse vous rict Court of Charles E. cont red by Section pen of the Court by Birdzetl, J.‘ Lauder & Lauder, Wahpewn, N,v. les, Fargo, | statute, supra, und se jeation, or by mail, or upon the per- son or persons occupying the land, when other than the one in whose name it is assessed, need not be mide. Such notice having been given, a tax | Lawrence, Murphy & N [N, d., attorneys for respondent. From Richland County | State of ‘North Dakota, ‘cx re Charles M. Kistler, respondent, In all probability the Boston Red{ City of Hankinson, a municipal cor jdeed duly executed thereafter is valid wht-handed ple a cicl ba We put over a pei TG poration, et al, appellants. jand operates to extinguish the liens he hord vit h jenal pitchers, | Winter that’ will mark the passing of| SYLLABUS: jof prior mortgages of record upon gue : r of| 8 ii rs Hurnshy to be the the ching ace of| (1). Under Section 37J1 (of the; the property. : ‘ Detro) rene ; red Patter in th que, is said to he dis-| Compiled Laws for 1913,.0 city has! 2. For reasons stated in the opin- that a vote was even ne satisfied with conditions at Boston] power to self special, improvement | ion. it is held that the proceedings 4 ee and the owners of the club are known | Warrants for eash at no‘Tess than the|Prior to the execution of the t f Hi NOTHING LIKE Rc. | to be ‘pee his poor showing last| par value théreof, to eredit the pro-|deed, including the proceedings for iy : SEN ° should prove good trad-| ceeds to the proper’ spectal \the sale of.the property, and the aM i Re mate; ment fund and use thé same in piy-|Suance of the tax certificates, were and prope Notice of expiration of the time to redeem, required by. chapter’ 63, Laws Sp. Ses. 1919, to be given all “mortgagees or assignees of mortya- gees holding unsatisfied record mort= ages,” need be given only when surh mortgagees or assignées have filed a statement with the: Auditor, asking ing for public improvements. In the instant case, undet the facts stated, it is held that the improvement war- rants were not sold for cash. (2) ‘Where’ the purported. purch- ! aser of municipal improvement war rants is shown to be a foreign, cor- poration which, upon. taking: the ‘war- rants, credited the municipality upon its books with the understanding| 0% demanding that such notice be that the money was to be Withdraien eye ae of 's Walt con's best | in payment of estimates ‘due the con-'_ Appeal from the district court o tng performa on’s vest | tractor, the placing of ‘such credit Renville County, Hon. A. G. Burr, | SH | does not amount to a sale for cash, Judge. Affirmed. Opinion of the court by Johnson, J. Langer & Nuchols, Bismarck, N.'D., BILL of the Compiled | | Laws for 19 the} (3). Under “Section. 3632 of the| TULLY. PARKER OBERLANDER An oyerwheiming Harvard victory or west. One of the outstanding players at Dartmouth ie Halfb: an wild against Harvard and Cornell and is hopeful of repentiy attorneys for appellant. N. D., attor- HAWLEY-cascy DAVIS. - and a decisive win over Br own, hag caused Dartmouth to believe that it can trim anything east © berlander, considered one of the est in-the capt, at ‘that position. is aga inst Chicago, “OUTSTANDING STARS OF DARTMOUTH Il. H. Steele, Mohall, ney for respondent. From Cass County State of North Dakota, plaintiff |and respondent, vs. Lewis’ Cook, de- }fenaamt and appell ant. A & SYLLABUS: A criminal ‘gomplaint, on pre- hearing ‘before the mabis- |trate, need not state the facts ‘cbh- ituting the offense with the same iT san infortha- + “It is too late ‘to challenge the suf- ficiency of a-pretiminary complaint, {which charges the defendant with the epecitie crime of bootlegging, cdm- | 9, | mitted by selling one gallon of alto- i) to a nanfed person within a cet- ! tain county, by a. motion to set aside | the information in the district upon j the ground that the complaint failed ,to allege that the sale was made ‘on premises not, owned or controlled by the defendant, when the defendant acquiesced in the jurisdiction of the Jongisteate, moved for u continuance, ‘DIEHL ‘PHAIL, | He ing under the Uniform MHlegitimacy legitimacy can be disputed only the husband or wife of the d nt of one or both of thei. in such case may be proved like other fact,” both husband and establish such illegitimaey, Appeal from the Distriet Court of that has behind ‘ “land J. A. Dwyer, Hankinson,’ N. D.,| Nelson County, Hon. A. T. Cole ” the ch Once ‘ a defense arising out of the subse-° ti _ Aa , i fadice. a a el! ‘ of White Sox| vent faire of the contractor fa, omnes for ama aago, hint under are tndsata testnes i had 0 omy yp ag N. D., attorneys for respondent. Act, and from an Order deaying his Chicago, Nov. 10,-Owner Charles | Sty owes to the warrant, elders ie peas, finotion: Moz sa anew. trial’ dofendaie iskey of the Chiengo White Sox|Oo wey Garrants, From Renville County "nee Is. , al i ust have a star J da ; Pir meee : ay Affirmed. ‘AL SIMMONS I i jshongstop it Ht is to be in the runs] (4 Calowing ine OS tamber| Pt vorperations plaintiff and ap: | Opinion ofthe court by . SINCE oa | nest year. It is understood! @'n'" W357, the failure of the city | pellant, vs. Mohall State Bank, et ee ee THE BEST SINCE Caiecieatherehent hat no ex: | cuthoritics to make a proper asses<- ‘al, defendants, American Investment 5 7 when! pense be spared in la: the right Coe CacHBSE MUSH EARLEHURBE AHL oo man Swink TRIS SPEAKER together, but it is; man, ment upon property in a spec eondente omy eerendant and re of Nelson County, of Lakota, for re- we of seldom f her when sood foot- Collins — wan finished | Sessment district, to meet obli; pondent. Poon x Li i ae ball plazers ge! together. ‘r-one able to step right into the| Under its special warrants, will ABUS: ‘ as ied We—“Hfe’s th and delivers, White Sox|dect the city to a general liabi q : ! : although its credit he not pledged to | tiftcate presents it to the count: 1 “ais rf : Gitte ones f 1 that” Ernest ig abe es arene cree From Cass County le h z t of the ¥ ore club is such af meet the costs and expenses incident | HUB ES PupaR, eum: ley State -of North Dakota, plaintiff be player to the special improvement. nd a notice of the expit- “and respondent, vs. James Danial was br hi is A f Be for the ma-]_ Appeal from the District Court of jatioa uf. fhe period of peuemanlie defendant and appellant. . ‘ 4 t jors for and on Richland County, Hon. Chas. containing the recitals of facts re-' SyPLABUS: {Dunn's refusal to part with him has} Wolfe, Judge. quired by the Btnute, Chi | 1.-‘One who takes ‘an order in this ai , ‘ic ee prevented the Oriole shortstop from oni ie cian ee in oi i 4 Majed to abs. tnep ponte “to be filled by a concern dh. Prem coming. up_ sooner. pinion of the Court by Birdzell, J. et y Bie s in another state, f e an Mien ono! Tke Davis, who played short for{""Lauder & Lauder, Wahpeton, N.'D.,! State “in whose induc snch dans. and purchase Saris cone h He win Uke Chicago during the season just elos-[and J. A. Dwyer, Hankinson, N. DB eins tarde on contains no trace of’ alcohol when : < sears ed, did as well as expected. attorneys for appellant. the owner of the land, within ‘the | Geli is not a ciller oF {but ie jc, within the terms of Section: 1B, or 2G of chapter 268, 8. L. 1 Appeal from district court of Cass County, Hon. M. J. Englert, Judge. Opinion of the court by Johnson, J. Reversed and dismissed. H, F. Horner, State’s Attorney and A. R. Bergesen, Assistant State’ |torney, Fargo, N. D., attorneys respondent & Weaver, Fi Thomas Sullivan torneys for pereliants for v. D., and Paul, Minn., at- Ton Tonight’s Radio ae —_—— ° The ledding features on tonight’ radio program are grand opera and ‘little symphony orehestra concerts. " Eastern Time WW (3: ') 6—Dinner concert. WGY (379.5) 6:80-—Dinner concert. WHAS (399.8) 2:30—Concert pro- F (492) 8:30— ane Gold By t is” and “KE: Hour.” bfohdeast by WEEE cu). WEI (as it WCAE (461.3), (WGR_ (319), WWJ 3" (484), WJAR’ (305.9), WCCO’ (116.4), WSAL (325 KDKA (369) 9—Little Orchestra WIZ (455) 10— Holland (469), “The Grand Tour— WRC LW. ul va ricties. 19:30-——Orche: Central Ti Ww (370.2) &--Hour of music. WMAQ (117.5) 8:30--Musieal pro- gran. WIR (517) 9 ight.” KTHS (374.8) 9 mphony jazz of- ena (432. 3). 9—Mnsical_ program, WHO (526) 11—Little Symphonié Orehestra. i WDAF | ( Frolit. « WPAA (476), 12-cTheater artists and entertainers. Pacific Time KPO (428.3) 8—Studio program. KGO (361.2) 0—Studio program. KNX (337) 10—-Movie night. KFI (487) 10---Ballnd Mou are competent as witnesses to} gaging in the liquor traf: | 1, i Symphony The city commission met lar weekly session last ev lowed the following bil journed 1 J. B. Smith, supplies | tention hospital [Golden West Laundry, plies i Modern killing dogs supplies for \ Anna B Thompson, It fire... Aug, Helle, servi Fred “Olson, service Burleigh Co. Red Cro: Bismarck Tribune, lications and printing Rembrandt Studio, supplies Albin Hedstrom, boarding guarding prisoner French’ & Welch Haw. Wachter Lay eas ing 7 M. Goetz 28 Hummel, labor's... 21 H. Christopher, labor or. J. Fettick, labor 21 3, Burton, labor sky Wm. J. Noggle, relaying con- crete pavement in alleys...1,366. BOWMAN UNDERTAKING PARLORS Licensed Embalmer in Charge. Day Phone 100 Night Phones 100 or 484R. | WEBB BROTHERS Undertakers ‘Embalmers Funeral Directors Licensed Embalyaer In Char $4 e. Day Phone 246 Night Phones 246-887 , home runs. nel eal do by a city in opponent i ; f the lecture Bhd nent | Construction, so as to rant a final; Act, Chapter 155, L. 1923, the! for 2 loss of gene ‘ e, forgotten. as award to the contractor based upon! mother of the child has it with ‘her of the foul, while hurdling cx! " * “a at oh S| GRE. ged | the completion of one or more uni in the court room, without objection! onl ry! , nerena : F se ae Rachie De ‘ ‘ while the entire contract is incom-. to its so being there onthe part of | af the defending com aan the hu me Me hae Haky stenline gualiiee, “She oF cee ae improvement, plete and unperformed, ‘the defendant, thete is no prejudicial | mits fouls so near its ov F Hr . Hreate ut has been being tothe work the city council srerél | (7) Under Section 8710 of the error by reason of the fact that the; these fouls only pu ; good a fellow ithe work the efty counell, in exersixe | Compiled Luws for 3, partial | state for the purpose of establishing | halving, the ! Up-Stage Tactics Handicap Ruths! be worth 10 of the Conipiied ‘Laws for 1913,| 2 ing the progress of the| the fact of the child's birth, inquires; the referee b eres Pea Denise care million BT10 of the Compiled Taws for oly Work are limited to 85 per cent of jof a witness as to whether’the child; Merely to deiay the P selva eS upentu doubt hat mo Or noe ee ate ttial payment tothe, amount of the estimates shown !is the child born to the mothe | first warn the offend ind i nseiv pestages No doubt the snd enemies in need would be a snug Nece and makes partial payment to) 1) nave been earned, 4 may be ii Jis within his pow roubles what with foiune dtr paid. * the contractor in the form of | (8) Where one seek by, paid | exobece ion by inquirk game if it is repe mest ] hope Ruth is sincere in his de-|T8Mts, and where the wari i de iti ete te 3. When two ) torn 1 q © hi faites. mus to compel city authorities to | collate acts tending to inerim- ‘ae Hei. termination to reform, The mere) transferred, the transferee levy a special nent to meet inate, disgrace or degrade him, and, QUSIY cateh a forwa ins wide ne MEE (cutting out of fair weather friends.| Jeet to defenses subsequent ithe purported obligations of warrants where such an inquiry is as to pre- | ing an eligible ; races MAN who pay homage to Ruth because he{ due to the failure of the contractor | yj h.y him, and where the major vious conviction on account of ai Side and the acne re one’s sera Te ait he, ned to, complete the work in accordance ietics of the warrtnts held aye jerlininal offense, {eis moe confirmed | Ball shall belong to the side that pt fsia Shes all its. Bageball needs colorful, ts re ee ola ene ‘one je | shown to be subject to defenses aris- to conviction for felons. Poe aie 1 ike Ruth. ne big fellow has mad Pra hii = ling out of breaches of contract by 5 nder Section 4422, C, L. 1918, m0 ‘or the club ers, made | ifprovement obli the contractor | f yb. U ‘tio , CLs 1913, | money for Ele. club. owners. nae to mreceive ment ia Avacrontar nna | the contracto the writ of mando-jproviding that “The presumption of | BILLS Allowed by City Commission oS y } \ | ; . . '